TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MalkavianScum Archive

View 0 posts and 203 comments by MalkavianScum on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-5

You want to sit and complain until someone powerful does something, and that's why we always lose and always will. We'll never take the power to make the changes and that's why we're here jacking each other off, because there really is nothing else we can or are willing to do.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 08:37 PM
7

Feminism (and yes, this IS "true feminism") is a thousand times more powerful than any men's movement. Do you have any fucking ideas? You're the one on the side-lines screaming "somebody DO something!" So maybe be the change you want to see and all that bullshit.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 08:35 PM
2

Maybe stop being so bitch-made and realize what world you're living in. Go and have a spazz attack on a feminist subreddit and see just how much they hate your fucking guts for having whatever passes for a penis between your legs. Then you need to come to the elementary realization that their views are influential and ingrained in many aspects of society. Then maybe, just maybe, you can realize you've been fucking gaslit to white knight and sperg out like you are now. You are a programmed NPC. Y…
/r/MensRights23/05/22 08:28 PM
2

He has the right to choke on his own dick. If a man doesn't have his own interests at heart, much less the interests of other men, then I couldn't give a fuck what happens to him
/r/MensRights23/05/22 08:25 PM
2

You're the only one who's upset. Have you made any posts sperging out on a feminist subreddit? I fucking doubt it. Wouldn't want to upset the more popular ideology.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 08:23 PM
3

In what universe does the word "jobsworth" apply? At least be respectable with your bullshit by standing by your words, nobody likes a backpedalling cuck.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 08:21 PM
11

That's not fucking free speech, that's defamation which is a crime and not a valid excuse for you anti-free speech raving bullshit.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:49 PM
1

That's fine by me. I'm glad men aren't embarrassing themselves by putting their disgusting gunt on display in every magazine.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:25 PM
1

Putting down the fork might. Just kidding, I'm a gross fatso too.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:25 PM
1

"She should date unattractive manlets because equality!!" That's some serious incel shit you just said.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:24 PM
1

It's also just fucking nasty to look at and immediately sours my impression of any company. They're basically advertising "We are a clothing company for morbidly obese people". I'm not buying that shit .
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:23 PM
1

"Body positivity" is bullshit for either gender. People need to GROW UP and realise that they are not perfect the way they are. They're flawed and unattractive and probably not very bright either, because that describes the majority of us. Maybe it's time for us all to grow a pair and improve ourselves rather than demanding that "society" accepts us just because.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:21 PM
1

Exactly, I wish these fucking clothing companies would stop ruining my dinner with all these god damn fat rolls on my TV screen.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:20 PM
1

In other words, the exact fucking opposite of what a model should like. Men are not so fragile that we need models to be as ugly and mediocre as us, are we? I'm certainly fucking not and if you are, it's a you problem. Get rid of fat models entirely and bring back the exceptionally attractive fairy people, I say.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:19 PM
1

Female models get all the good drugs while male models are stuck with steroids. It's not fair I tell ya. Getting a cocaine body is more fun than getting a 'roid body. Although those little manlet models who look twelve and model hats and shit probably powder their noses plenty as well.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:16 PM
1

Who fucking cares? EVERYBODY knows that these models are exceptional and genetically gifted. The only reason these models make you feel insecure is if you were already insecure, which sounds like a you problem. Grown adults should not be having these issues. Models SHOULD be gorgeous exceptional physical specimens.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:14 PM
1

Apply the concept to BOTH sexes. Models shouldn't be gross to look at. Models SHOULD be tall, fit, exceptionally attractive ubermensches. I don't want to only see people who look like me. Fill the world with beauty, including the magazines and commercials. Sorry, fatties, but we aren't beautiful. We're unhealthy and unattractive.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:13 PM
1

As a fat person myself, my respect for fat people is limited as it should be. Respect isn't something you automatically get because you're a human, it's something you gain by having admirable qualities. If the only thing I know about a person is that they are fat (and statistically they are most likely fat because they eat too much shit) then sorry, but I don't respect that person. They may be a great, admirable person but if all I know about them is that they are obese then I am doubtful of tha…
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:08 PM
2

I love the term "thicc", it's basically said by people with a fat fetish who won't admit they like fat girls. It's okay to describe a fat person as fat, dudes. Stop with the "thicc" bullshit.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:01 PM
7

"Women are pretty much eugenicists." It is LITERALLY in their very DNA to be eugenicists, and to only perpetuate the most desirable genes. The female of every species is evolved to select the best genetics in a mate and humans are no different. That's how species avoid deteriorating their genetics and slowly crawling to extinction. The problem is that in the modern world where we aren't fighting for our very survival and have easy access to more food than we could ever need the standards and pri…
/r/MensRights23/05/22 12:59 PM
-1

No we fucking aren't. Don't be so dramatic. Male MODELS are expected to be very fit and attractive, as they should be. As should female models. If you pick modelling as a career you should be expected to put in the work and not be a fatass
/r/MensRights23/05/22 12:53 PM
5

"KiDs NeEd ThEiR mOtHeR."
/r/MensRights23/05/22 12:51 PM
3

Feminists perpetuating "Muh female stereotypes" by gaslighting and minimizing the struggles of men because they're men. Keep taking Ls, feminism. Never change.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 05:30 PM
8

Gender equality doesn't NEED to be in the constitution. When your constitution is written CORRECTLY you don't need to mention every special little group in it.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 05:25 PM
7

OF COURSE they allow black people on! It's a subreddit dedicated to denigrating and mocking white people! I guess black people can't be racist in clown world, though.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 05:24 PM
22

Exactly. "He responded to her relentless psychological and physical abuse by destroying his property and calling her a cunt in texts! HOW TeRrIbLe!" A bunch of neutered nu-humans of the modern spreadsheet world who have forgotten what it's like to feel human emotion.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 05:20 PM
9

There's absolutely nothing hypocritical about it. Control your emotions instead of resorting to violence and don't be a cuckold. It's not complicated.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 07:25 PM
2

Ukraine has the numbers right now but with their capital city threatened everything they have is committed. I am very doubtful that Russia doesn't have many more bodies and equipment in reserve. A military so large from a country so large will of course take a great deal of time to deploy, but unless something huge happens I think the Ukrainians are running out of time. The west hasn't done anything to dissuade Russia from continuing, other than financially destroy the lives of ordinary Russians…
/r/MensRights09/03/22 02:07 AM
1

Narcissistic, self-congratulating, load of horseshit. That's what I think of it. Women's issues are taken seriously every day of the year so Women's Day is just a giant load of shit. The feminists have defeated us in every effort we have made to have our voices heard, and Women's Day feels like nothing more than a yearly victory lap.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 01:19 AM
1

They're not wrong, though, are they? Men are being pushed right into the fucking dirt while women are encouraged and actively have things tipped in their favour in order to succeed, even if they don't have the merit.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 01:16 AM
3

1) It happens to be true. 2) It's clearly a mockery of feminists, which is fantastic. No war has ever been won by taking the moral high ground so stop showing misandrists a level of civility that they would never show you.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 01:13 AM
7

Hate crimes in general are authoritarian thought crimes that criminalize freedom of speech based on the subjective emotions of the government or the complainant. This is just a small stone to add to the pile of laws of an already deeply authoritarian country. They act like fascists and arrest people for calling them fascists. This is all over Britain and the commonwealth.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 01:11 AM
13

Imagine thinking Australia cares about democracy. The commonwealth is moving quickly and deliberately towards Fascism.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 01:08 AM
18

My country, Britain, and all the commonwealth nations are moving VERY quickly to authoritarianism. If the government ever finds my Reddit account and links it to me, my bank accounts will probably be frozen, as has already happened with many people. This is a racist, sexist fascist regime which is not exclusive to any political party and we see this most clearly with Australia and Canada but it is everywhere in the commonwealth.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 01:07 AM
3

Have you been to Vietnam? Real hard to move artillery through there and for bombers to get eyes on the enemy. Not the case with Ukraine. Urban fighting will always favour the side that can throw the most male bodies and equipment into the fighting. Soviet equipment was pure shit but numbers and mass-production are what won ww2. Volunteering against such odds is admirable but forcing people to throw away their lives for war they'll probably lose is both idiotic and immoral. I haven't seen Zelensk…
/r/MensRights09/03/22 12:59 AM
4

The men who fought in WW2 were in a very different social climate. They had something to fight for. They loved their home and they hated their enemy. They also had fucking TRAINING, which the Ukrainians are not receiving. Talking for myself, though, I would not want to be drafted into a war because I have no love for my homeland. I love our history and our past virtues which are all being eroded as we slide into authoritarianism. Would I have fought in ww2? None of us can say "yes" because we we…
/r/MensRights09/03/22 12:50 AM
3

You wouldn't fight either, you pampered fairy, so keep quiet. If you lived in Russia you wouldn't be protesting, and if you lived in Ukraine, you'd be with your family trying to get out. There's nothing wrong with that, but stop asking tougher men than you to do something you would NEVER do. You can go over there and take up arms if you want.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 12:43 AM
-2

Things you don't like aren't war crimes. Conscription is perfectly legal in every way. We might not like it, but stop calling everything in war that you disapprove of a war crime.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 12:40 AM
1

20000 Indian students evacuated with efforts underway to get the other foreign students out.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 12:36 AM
7

People are rooting for Ukraine quite rightly because it's not the aggressor and is fighting for it's very existence, but don't let western propaganda fool you, it's still an Eastern European hellhole. Although, to be fair, I highly doubt any western country will behave any differently in the same situation.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 12:34 AM
9

My deepest respects to anyone volunteering to fight and defend their country. My deepest condolences to anyone forced to fight in what is very likely an unwinnable war. In war, the side with the most male bodies and vehicles to throw into the grinder almost always wins. If the Finns lost land, I can't see how the Ukrainians won't also do so. Of course, the men who win on whatever side will receive no reward or recognition. They're just expendable robots in the eyes of their countries and the wes…
/r/MensRights09/03/22 12:32 AM
1

Bruh. Is "son" the new "kid"? Is that what weird boomers type now to sound tough on the internet? Pretty weird, but okay. Doesn't change the fact that you're ignorant.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 03:30 AM
1

NO SHIT, SHERLOCK. Jesus, you fedora-tipping Hitchens worshippers are more interested in dunking on people than you are in actually understanding what the fuck someone's saying.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 03:20 AM
2

You encourage TODDLERS to serve your political movement. You sound like a great person, raising a bunch of little manhaters. I think it's great that someone who lectures people about consent who have been falsely accused as though they are guilty is influencing the minds of children. Come to think of it, you do resemble a kindergarten teacher with how self righteous and unintelligent you seem.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 03:18 AM
2

Not hard to read. It's literally one sentence with no substance. Sounds like you're a new college student taking "Baby's First Feminism" and inserting it when it's completely irrelevant.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 03:13 AM
0

What would that POSSIBLY achieve? It just seems like a very naive solution.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 02:15 AM
2

Those men CHOSE to marry those women. "Victim blaming" and taking away all agency from them are just as bad and you are doing the latter. Let's just get rid of all the jargon and buzzwords and speak plainly for once. Those men married shit women. Did those women behave differently before marriage? Probably, but the red flags were definitely there. And YES, they should have done something about it. How is this even a point of debate? If you're being treated like dirt you need to leave. There are …
/r/MensRights10/02/22 02:13 AM
1

The FDA approved a medication for AIDs that was highly carcinogenic and caused the same side effects as chemotherapy. They blocked a far more effective medication and so a black market opened up and many people were arrested for selling a better medication than the FDA approved. Years, and countless dead people, later, they finally approved the safer, more effective medication. My point is this: STOP TRUSTING GOVERNMENT AGENCIES LIKE A FUCKIN' LEMMING.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 02:04 AM
1

The levels of estrogen are the issue, you absolute fucking brainlet. We all have iron in our blood, but if we regularly ate food that increased the iron in our blood it would cause issues. Maybe you should have a basic understand of biology before you pretend to be smarter than everyone.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 02:00 AM
1

The only viable thing we can really do (unless you're rich and can afford to live on a diet of overpriced, reliably-sourced organic food) is take Estrogen blockers. That should mitigate at least some of it.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 01:58 AM
1

Those feminists are not extremists. Everyone from the suffragettes to those second wave feminists everyone loves so much has held the same view of men that the modern "extremists" hold. Feminism has always been a radical hate movement and it's the most successful hate movement in history.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 01:48 AM
3

FEMinism cares about women only, so it only makes sense to have a group specifically for men's interests. It's not rocket science. If feminism gives a shit about both genders, change the name instead of simply fudging the definition to gaslight people.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 01:37 AM
1

My view on this is the same as my view on contraception for women: Condoms are sold everywhere and are cheap.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 01:34 AM
8

Feminism is garbage. Get that shit out of here. Feminism is the cause, not the solution. We are men's rights activists and you can FUCK OFF piggybacking your vile ideology on our basic ideals of fairness.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 01:28 AM
2

The reason, I think, that many people are against these things being taught is because they don't trust a bunch of government employees to teach it PROPERLY. And I don't blame them.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 01:26 AM
4

I think all of these kinds of issues stem from particular cultures. Black men are not inherently violent simply because of the violent crime statistics. Most of the men committing violent crimes come out of shitty neighbourhoods with shitty cultures. It's never about race. Of course, taking onboard your own bad experiences and being wary of people until you know them better is never a bad move and is not the same thing as racism. Don't assume someone you don't know is a bad person, but don't ass…
/r/MensRights10/02/22 01:15 AM
2

Welcome to the 21st century. The only men's issues people actually fix are ones that are framed as women's issues. The message they're sending is very clear: Men don't matter/
/r/MensRights10/02/22 12:24 AM
4

Part of that problem is men, though. If men placed the proper amount of value on what's between a woman's legs (ie. almost none) women would lose most of the power they have to control a man's life and make literally ALL of the choices in a marriage.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 12:17 AM
3

Part of me thinks there is some psychotic tendency that makes them nag for no other reason than the sick satisfaction they get from nagging. Hopefully they die alone surrounded by cats but more likely than not some weak-willed sap with get roped in by them and be grateful for the attention.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 12:16 AM
3

If we told women the truth they'd lose their minds. We do not need a woman. Finding the right woman for us can improve our lives but we do not and should not ever depend on them for our happiness. This feeling of dependence that many men have (I think we're all aware of how the approval of women is often used to measure a man's worth - and it's men who do that the most) is the reason they put up with abuse and don't call it abuse. If a man isn't willing to drop a woman at the first sign of abuse…
/r/MensRights10/02/22 12:13 AM
5

A feminist would say it's sexist of them to assume that the woman has to do all the chores. I say it's bloody insulting of them to assume that you can't look after yourself.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 12:08 AM
2

Typical feminist, thinking there are men catcalling her behind every hedgerow. Oh yeah, I'll really believe that, because men just lose their minds over every OK-looking woman. Come back when your life gets destroyed in a divorce or you're falsely accused of rape.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 11:57 PM
1

Why the fuck are you here? If you believe that speech is sexual harassment then you have no reason to be here.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 11:50 PM
1

You're part of the problem. Too many fucking saboteurs in this so-called "men's rights movement". You've drank the cool-aid and have no problem with men being demeaned and emasculated by the corporate monster and the women it panders to. If I have to waste the majority of my life in a building doing something I don't want to do (ie. work) then I'll make whatever jokes I want to fucking make to my friends.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 11:48 PM
2

What the fuck are you babbling about?
/r/MensRights09/02/22 11:39 PM
1

By that same token, nobody knows how many real rapes there are, because there are bound to be at least a small number of people who don't come forward. Statistics when it comes to any social issue are incomplete and I think most people who care enough to look at the statistics know that.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 11:35 PM
0

Calling you out for using your condition as an excuse to be a twat is not ableism. I have ADHD but I don't get mad at my bosses if I miss a deadline and accuse them of being ableist like a dickhead. And you called people halfwits for using a word in a commonly accepted colloquial way. That's clearly you making a claim of intellectual superiority. You're not Rainman, you're just a dick.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 11:30 PM
1

People who want justice and fairness have been losing this battle for decades, because your tactics are shit. They fuck up the world while we wave our fists and say "Hey, that's bad! Stop it!" It doesn't work and it never will. We are impotent because we're more interested in the moral high ground than we are in winning.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 11:23 PM
1

The commonwealth countries seem to be more corrupted than most.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 11:21 PM
1

I'm sure that sounded good in your head but it's fucking dumb. 1) you're not intelligent enough to understand the mind of a god and 2) Most gods in mythology don't give a fuck about anyone but themselves.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 11:20 PM
0

Looking for progress in 2022 is like looking for blood out of a fucking stone.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 12:45 PM
0

Don't take your autism out on the rest of us. Having a mental disability doesn't make you smarter than everyone, either, just FYI. Most people understand colloquial language, so they will use colloquial language, and that's just something you'll need to get used to.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 03:43 AM
1

Incel is Involuntarilly Celibate. They are virgins who have been rejected by women. I know it's ironic for me to say it here, but the incels you see on Reddit aren't representative of them. Reddit's a poor platform for finding the general views of groups of people. Incel is a term that was invented by feminists to marginalize these men so it's no wonder some of them don't like women considering the absolute scorn and public ridicule they've faced. Most men who are rejected by women just sit quie…
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:54 AM
1

JOKE'S ON YOU, BECAUSE I AM. Lol just kidding
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:41 AM
1

Because your view of "mysoginistic" people is clearly warped and inaccurate. People who can't get laid aren't mysoginistic, and you only believe they are because other people have told you "oh, those incels are soooo evil and nasty" and you were foolish enough to believe them. And no, I haven't been burned by women because I'm very selective.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:40 AM
0

Because normal fucking people understand that there are COLLOQUIALISMS. A college education, or acting like you have one, doesn't make you intelligent, especially when you're only coming off as pedantic and dense. Everybody knows that in this context "whore" means "slut".
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:37 AM
1

In Canada? You overestimate their intelligence, bud. Identifying as a woman will put them in a REALLY awkward position, even if it's obvious why he's doing it.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:35 AM
1

Taking an anger management course will only be viewed as an admission of guilt. If they are CERTAIN you're guilty and you can't do any more to prove your innocence, then maaaaaybe(?) you'll get a lighter sentence. You're in Canada, though, so you're probably just fucked.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:33 AM
0

Yeah, dude, like all these dummies clearly aren't very woke, bro. Marxism's great and not at all verifiably false, brah.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:31 AM
1

Marxism is clearly defined, and clearly STUPID. If a post alienates Marxists, then that's great. The fewer Marxists there are in a movement, the better.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:31 AM
1

You're right, it's all men's fault (let's just conveniently ignore that most "slut-shamers" are other women).
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:29 AM
1

Nobody here denies that misogyny exists, we only deny that this slur applies to us. And virgins (which is the definition of incel regardless of feminist talking points) are also not automatically misogynists. It's that simple.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:27 AM
1

Your entire post was just parroting common feminist talking points. Don't be a hypocrite. You, like most people, repeat what the people on your screen tell you.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:25 AM
1

Also, keep it to yourself instead of being gross and oversharing which apparently is normal now and it won't actually be an issue. There, I have solved the problem.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:24 AM
1

Just don't overshare with people is what he's saying. There is literally no reason for anyone to have knowledge of my sexual activity.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:19 AM
1

Of course, just keep it to yourself like literally everybody used to do. I'm not going to broadcast my sexual activity like some weirdo. When did THAT become a normal thing to do?
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:18 AM
1

Personally, I greatly approve of the term "fuckboy" as I practise gender equality in being grossed out by both fuckboys and sluts.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:17 AM
1

He's spouting feminist talking points and his understanding of what an "incel" also comes from feminist talking points. Too much corporate news media consumption, I think. I think there may be too many socially engineered NPCs on this subreddit (and in general) for any meaningful change to come from it.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:16 AM
1

The SJW-ism on this subreddit is frankly concerning. Do we care about men's rights here, or simping? I wish everyone would pick a side. I'm with you, by the way. Promiscuity is nasty.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:14 AM
0

Ah, there's the completely unhelpful pedantry I love to see on these politics-based subreddits. It's not as if there's anything more important to be talking about. Thank god you're here to take commonly used and commonly understood terms and acting like some overpaid academic elite in schooling us on the correct definition... which we all already know.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:12 AM
1

Many women think their vaginas are fucking magic and that men are so simple-minded that they only want the pussy (sadly, they're often right). Why else do you think so many women use sex as a weapon? Can't really blame them, though. In the end, we are just another animal species enslaved by evolution and biology. Nature's a fucking trainwreck and we're no different.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:09 AM
1

The approval of women is seen, even by most men, as a sign of your value as a man. Society's a pile of shit, man.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:05 AM
1

37 years old, alone, in a shitty house, with seventeen cats, DESPERATELY trying to convince themselves that they're happier alone, because men simply aren't interested in promiscuous women for anything other than sex. I can't speak for heterosexual women, but I'm a bi man and I feel the same way about promiscuous men as I do about big ol' hoes.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:04 AM
0

The "system" is called biology and there is no solution to it whatsoever. We're just animals at the end of the day and like all animals, we are absolute fucked up to the core.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:01 AM
1

Why? Because modern society has deemed promiscuity as absolutely normal and healthy and that "girl power" is more important than standards and recognizing a red flag when you see one? Well, I disagree, and it's not exclusive to women. I have known zero promiscuous people with whom I would want any kind of long term relationship. I'm friends with some of them, but certainly not my first choice as love interests.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:58 AM
1

So the lack of attraction from women, which may very well be nothing more than being physically unattractive, MUST mean you're a bad person, because I guess women are automatically fantastic judges of character? Sounds nonsensical but okay.. Maybe some "internalized misandry" (unless you're a woman, in which case it's just regular misandry) but what do I know? I'm overweight meaning I'm unattractive meaning I don't get laid meaning I'm actually a secret misogynist.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:57 AM
2

Incel means "involuntarily celibate" simply meaning they can't get laid. Everything else is just OP's assumptions, presumably based on what feminists and the media have said about them. I guess OP just thinks most virgins are pious monks who, despite not being religious, are virgins at 26 by choice, and that the approval of women is the mark of how much of a good person you are and therefor "Incels" must simply be evil because the news says so. "Incel" is the language of the enemy used to margin…
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:54 AM
2

He was also totally socially inept and quite an unpleasant person. Being involuntarily celibate should neither be cruelly mocked or praised. Newton wasn't a pious monk or "too InTeLlIgEnT" for a relationship, he was just not good with women.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:49 AM
1

There's probably also something wrong with them psychologically. Hot take in the Tinder generation, I know.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:47 AM
2

This is another symptom of men viewing their worth through the lense of attaining the approval of women. It is, to use those men's words, the most beta shit imaginable.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:46 AM
1

Eh... "slut-shaming" (having social standards, in other words. And by "slut", I and nobody else on Earth defines that as "sleeping with more than one man") should be a standard applied to EVERYONE, that's my only issue. Being chaste simply through being socially incompetent shouldn't be praised, however, although it shouldn't be mocked and ridiculed either. Edit: I have also seen no "misogynistic vibes", although for all I know you may view me as a horrendous woman hater simply for not thinking …
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:42 AM
1

This is just the pope being a virtue-signalling fucknozzle first and a "Christian" second, which isn't exactly a new thing.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:39 AM
1

The implication there is that the father is ABOVE the mother, as clearly God is more important than the church and the church's only purpose should be to SERVE God. Ask the secular pope about this, and I doubt he'd say the father is above the mother. Not since the 1960s infiltration of activists in the church will you hear that from any high-ranking clergyman.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:36 AM
1

As someone who, while not Christian, identifies the most with the Orthodox church, I always think when it comes to the Catholic church, "yeah, being God's mother is cool and everything, but can we hear more about God?"
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:34 AM
1

I'm not a Christian but if I was I'd be Orthodox, the rest are theologically inconsistent and seem to be infested with secular people who are beholden to the political fashions of the day.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:33 AM
1

So the pope is like the holy Greta Thunberg? "If I pray reaaaally hard, despite having free will and being responsible for the Earth as a human being, a shepherd of the Earth, then all the bad things will go away, including all the pedo priests I have protected and the homosexuals I've violated the Bible by allowing into the church." I'm not anti-Christian at all, but Catholics who still believe the pope is anything other than a political figure are absolutely deluded.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:30 AM
1

Some people believe it was all just Shrooooms so I'm not that interested in what "scholars" have to say on this kind of subject.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:28 AM
2

If you subscribe to Catholic or Orthodox theology (which I do, although I am not a Christian) then Jesus is the ultimate gigachad because he conceived HIMSELF. He was his own damn son. That's fucking DOPE.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:27 AM
1

I'm not a neckbearded "muh skeptic" Hitchens-worshipping atheist type but if anyone still believes the corrupted Catholic church to be any kind of servant of God then I've got an NFT to sell them.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:23 AM
0

It's not 2008 anymore, shave the neckbeard and find more sophisticated arguments, you absolute fucking cringelord.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:21 AM
0

Yes, since Vatican II, which occurred when Catholicism became filled with new-age left wing activism and all of the secular poison that is evident today.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:19 AM
1

Christ's bride has always meant that the church is married to and IN SERVICE TO Christ.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:18 AM
0

No, it wasn't "because he was in a bad mood." It was because, according to the Bible, humanity had become entirely corrupted and debased and God is omniscient and so could see what the future looked like if things were allowed to continue. But, hey, you don't want to ACTUALLY understand what the Bible says, because that would interfere with the silly little Chris Hitchens roleplay you dummies have going on.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:16 AM
2

It was around the 1960s when left wing social activism became part and parcel of being Catholic clergy when the Catholic church officially became an absolute fucking sham (although the sexual perversion had already infested the church a while before that). 1960s feminism and 1960s hippy culture are intertwined in the post vatican II Catholic church. But of course anything I say further will warrant the magic words "conspiracy theory" despite being documented so I'll save my energy and say no mor…
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:13 AM
1

And here I was thinking that doing unwarranted violence to ANYONE was a sin. I'm very glad the very holy, definitely-not-atheist definitely-not-leftist definitely-not-indoctrinated-Communist totally Catholic pope has clarified.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:10 AM
1

I do feel bad for the few relatively normal people in Hollywood. They just want to be in films but have to be surrounded by repulsive vampire-cockroach-mannequin people with absolutely fucked up brains in order to do so.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:09 AM
1

Is it just me or do Hollywood women seem kind of detached and pseudo-human? There's just something so indescribably WEIRD and uncanny valley about the way these people look, behave, and speak. Creepy shit. I've never understood the celebrity-obsessed because to me they seem unremarkable at best but most commonly repulsive. And when you look at Hollywood you must bear in mind that these people are not indicative of how regular people behave. The transactional nature of sex in Hollywood probably a…
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:06 AM
1

Of course they were, because she's a woman and almost every court in the "civilised" world has been intentionally PACKED with feminists. Most people working at the CSA (Child Support Agency) here in the UK are women and quite frankly the horrible way they treat fathers and the destruction that agency has caused is consistent with that fact. These organizations are not on your side and neither are the governments.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 12:56 AM
1

Look at how the UN (that has had the worst dictatorships of the 20th and 21st centuries on its council) responded to the Falklands conflict, falling in line behind the USSR and Cuba in their condemnation of Britain for protecting a British island populated by British people. Or, alternatively, look at all of its sanctions against Israel compared to its sanctions against all of the theocratic dictatorships in the region (practically all of whom are actually in the UN). The UN has ALWAYS been corr…
/r/MensRights05/01/22 12:52 AM
1

The UN is a corrupt, shady organization and always has been. I trust them as much as I trust any individual government. The people who have the ear of the UN are not good people.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 12:47 AM
1

EXACTLY. Nobody gives one single solitary shit about boys. Saying that up to 40% may be girls might just be a ploy to get countries to actually give a fuck about this issue because if they just say they're all boys NOTHING will ever be done about it. Government works upstream from culture in order to win votes, therefor in 2021 ('22 now, I guess) governments will do nothing to solve a problem exclusively affecting boys or men.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 12:44 AM
1

The poll doesn't say "left" it says "leftist", the definition of which doesn't seem hard to come by.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 12:32 AM
1

Pro-2A, generally think government is worthless at best but more often malicious, believe that access to firearms is a human right only to be taken away when there are violent crimes on a person's criminal record, anti-abortion, think my country is run by two flavours of socialist and that the USA is run by one party. I believe that private enterprise is more effective than government programs and that charities are better at helping the poor than government welfare schemes. Generally I just bel…
/r/MensRights04/01/22 06:35 PM
2

Maybe the actual definitions of those words?
/r/MensRights04/01/22 06:31 PM
2

If you aren't on the birth certificate then you're fine, aren't you? My dad's name isn't on the birth certificate and I don't think he was ever compelled to give money, even though he and my mum were just separated and never divorced. I don't know. It sounds like you're in the clear but you can always get a proper DNA test done if you want. Guarantee you she was a hoe and there's a decent chance it isn't actually your kid.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 06:25 PM
6

Quite a few of them have turned out to be sex criminals, so not much reason not to distrust them.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 04:34 PM
56

Oh boo hoo, some women have to get jobs for once in their lives. There is definite privilege in society, but it's not male
/r/MensRights28/12/21 04:33 PM
5

What's the difference between a male feminist and a sexual predator? ​ ​ ​ ​ Not a joke. Genuinely asking.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 02:55 PM
4

Let this be an object lesson that the main principal of their ideology is that language is power. Incel is literally just a dude that can't get laid, which throughout every generation of this and most other species accounts for the majority of males. These people know they're wrong, but they don't care, because it's ALL about power. Every argument they make is in bad faith because bad faith is the core of their ideology.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 02:53 PM
1

I don't believe anybody who makes these claims if I don't know the person very well. That's what evidence is for. The judicial system needs to be the focus in this issue. The laws need changing. It's as simple as that, really
/r/MensRights28/12/21 02:47 PM
2

Amazing how low the bar is.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 02:44 PM
1

If you're in the USA, carry a firearm. If you're in a state with shit gun laws, move at your earliest convenience to an open carry state. No excuse for not taking advantage of laws that allow you to protect yourself regardless of your gender. We in the UK are not so lucky. Even being caught with a knife gets you prosecuted here. Funny how that doesn't seem to stop the people we need to defend ourselves against.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 02:42 PM
5

Don't talk to women about that shit. Ever. You talk about that stuff with other men and don't share it with any woman in your life.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 02:38 PM
0

Self defence isn't a crime. If someone hits you, you don't know whether they're going to hit you again and you have good reason to feel endangered, so give as good as you get. Or do nothing and just use it for Reddit karma. Whatever floats your boat.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 02:36 PM
2

Sounds to me like she's being quite.... hysterical. Sorrynotsorry
/r/MensRights28/12/21 02:33 PM
1

Pretty sure whiny little victims like you are what make us a laughing stock. If you want to be a slave to some arbitrary collective, most of whom don't agree with you, that's fine, but don't call it freedom. You sound very insecure and I'm no longer going to be an outlet for your whining. Bye
/r/MensRights28/12/21 02:28 PM
1

"Most men in general are weak." Not true. At all. Men are strong and resilient and the people who want to stamp us down are severely underestimating us, and we don't need people like you underestimating us as well. And no, I'm not a tough guy, I'm quite a normal man. Not a big tough guy but not a weak little victim either. Don't project your own weakness onto your entire gender and stop advocating for the degenerate collectivist ideology of the enemy because I'm not buying that shit for anything…
/r/MensRights27/12/21 04:43 PM
1

We can advocate for our basic civil rights without being a bunch of collectivist freaks about it. You sound very "woke" to me, and the woke element will be the ones to ruin the movement. Maybe you just want weak men to flourish rather than men in general?
/r/MensRights27/12/21 02:09 PM
1

I don't give a fuck about society. Society's collapsing anyway. I'm an individual and always will be. Leave the groupthink to the morons of the world.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 01:41 PM
2

My life peaked when I was four when I didn't know the existence of most things, but alas..
/r/MensRights27/12/21 01:24 PM
1

No. I want to be viewed as a person instead of a member of a group. That's what individualism is.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 01:24 PM
1

Pretty mild by Hollywood standards. And 16 is the age of consent here in England and most other countries so I just don't get particularly upset about it. If there's a big age gap it's definitely creepy as hell but I just can't find it in me to get angry about it.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 10:28 PM
3

My policy is believe nobody. That's the policy that gave rise to due process and evidence in the first place, after all.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 10:25 PM
1

Not having periods is definitely something I'm thankful for. Sounds like a bad time.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 10:20 PM
1

That's certainly true. I'm bi (kind of. I have a strong preference for women generally speaking but have had attractions to some men I've known) so I certainly don't see the world as non-straight vs. straight men. My issue is with the political movement. I wouldn't be caught dead at a pride parade because I just find them distasteful and the LGBT movement is about as woke as you can get in my experience and very much falls within the victim-aggressor worldview with straight men as aggressors and…
/r/MensRights25/12/21 10:16 PM
1

Oh it's not unique to any one country. It's more obvious in the USA because that country was founded on those ideals which are now being destroyed, but it has been a problem in Europe for a long time now.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 10:11 PM
1

Oh that's just a game thing. It's a faction from Vampire The Masquerade which is just a weird edgy RPG. I picked the username very haphazardly when making a new Reddit account lol
/r/MensRights25/12/21 10:10 PM
1

In the west? Absolutely none that matter. For men, it's a different story.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 10:08 PM
2

Yeah, because it's gross. Imagine being a normal woman looking at the bra burners on the news back in the day. "The fuck are those girls doing over there?"
/r/MensRights25/12/21 10:07 PM
1

Women who complain about "manspreading" want to exert power over you by making you sit on your own balls. It is more pathetic than sitting down to piss and any woman who makes such demands needs to be put in a capsule and ejected into outer space.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 10:05 PM
0

Mansplaining is and always has been a way to denigrate and discredit men. Anyone who uses that word is a thundercunt. Stop giving credit where credit isn't due.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 10:03 PM
2

I'm going to start using loose pussy energy in my vocabulary now. Thank you, good stranger. Have you heard of the comedian Amy Schumer? CRAZY loose pussy energy.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:58 PM
2

Gaslighting is also a common tactic used by the "woke" people so I don't even consider it a gendered word. I consider it an accurate term describing a tactic commonly employed by the sort of people who say "mansplaining". Their main gaslighting method is through the power they attain with language. "Mansplaining" is part of the gaslighting.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:56 PM
1

Fuck 'em. Cut ties. You don't owe your mother anything if she treats you like trash. And don't "mansplain" anything to them. If they ask you to help with something, say no and make them ask twice. It might sound petty, but I think it's a good way to get them to understand that THEY asked YOU and that you don't particularly care about the thing and didn't just start bossing them around.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:53 PM
0

The only man in recorded history to have gotten a woman to admit she was wrong. I jest, of course. Kind of ;)
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:49 PM
1

The fact that feminism has a thousand different definitions renders it utterly ridiculous and illegitimate, imo.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:45 PM
1

Good. So sick of that patriarchal mansplaining book trying to broaden my vocabulary. So difficult to learn invented buzzwords when it takes years for them to end up in the dictionary. Who needs it, amirite?
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:44 PM
2

I care more about the dog rape part than the "misgendering". Sorry. If the law accidentally gets something right, I'll take it. Also, bestiality and rape are different crimes. The dog fucker laws don't seem to discriminate against men in the same way the rape laws do so I think the law has been applied as written here.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:38 PM
2

Radical feminists who seem to have had quite a lot of influence on the laws that govern our lives. And people might not hate us (although the LGBT political movement certainly doesn't seem very fond of us), but they certainly don't seem to give a shit about us. But why should they, when many of us seem incapable of giving a shit about ourselves? and "victim blaming yourself" doesn't seem to make sense in this context.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:36 PM
0

I'm simply frustrated and would like for this subreddit to remain on-topic for a change. But hey, why let things like making progress in our cause and trying to get our rights back get in the way of more important things, like irrelevant arguments over mainstream issues that already have extremely widespread attention? I'm glad our priorities in order. I'm sure the men's rights movement will go far..
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:33 PM
0

I completely disagree that this person's rights have been violated in anyway. The person claims to be a woman and as a result is being put in a women's prison, possibly endangering the female inmates. That's your equality. Congratulations. No rights have been violated except possibly for the inmate's rights to have their welfare looked after by the prison.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:30 PM
2

Of course. They've always been racist misandrists and now that they have all the power why would they bother denying it? They gaslight when it serves their power games but they're honest when lying doesn't actively help them. Power is the be all and end all of their entire worldview and it has been since it's very beginnings.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:20 PM
2

Science Fiction literature (or more specifically the culture and industry that suckles on it) has been like this for even longer than more mainstream pop culture, as far as I can tell.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:18 PM
1

On Reddit downvotes and Karma are pretty much meaningless. Most people don't down or upvote so downvotes could mean a lot of people disagree, or maybe only two people. Don't worry about. But back to the point, the issue is clearly not about men and women and "representation" (that great nothingburger that we're all expected to worship) it's about meritocracy and the complete and utter lack of it in our culture.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:16 PM
0

The idea of "underrepresented" is just woke programming that we've all been subjected to. There is no actual reason why X or Y (whether it be women or men or any other demographic) group MUST be involved in something. That's like saying "women are underrepresented in chess". Well if a woman was as good as Magnus Carlsen that wouldn't be the case but you can't just WILL that to happen and I've never heard any sound argument why that would be either a moral good or a moral evil. Representation is …
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:13 PM
2

Science fiction has a longer history than most areas of media of venerating and rewarding horrendously overrated female writers. Compare the likes of Harlan Ellison to any of them and it's glaringly obvious that the Hugos have become the Oscars of Science Fiction. It's more about sending a message rather than recognizing actual merit.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:09 PM
3

The science fiction crowd is the most woke bunch of lunatics you could ever meet outside of a law school (sad but true) and it's been like that for a good long while. OP will definitely get called a misogynist and banned for posting this in those corners of the internet.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:06 PM
4

These things don't matter to me. What matters is individualism. All that really matters at the end of the day is how the law views us, and the law should view us all as equal. What misandrists think is of no importance to me because I don't like them and won't associate with them. The problem is the law. How I am culturally seen as a man doesn't matter to me, because I'll be myself regardless. What matters is that the law discriminates against us and that needs to be changed. Individualism and r…
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:03 PM
1

I believe the law says "HIS penis" so if the law also accepts that you can just decide what gender you want to be that week (which the UK law does) then no, it's just ordinary males who are discriminated against. Big surprise there.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 08:58 PM
1

He probably thinks it'll be smooth-sailing in a female prison, but shanks don't discriminate and the second the other inmates feel threatened shit will get real.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 08:57 PM
0

Why can't you stay on topic!? There is a MEN'S RIGHTS (clue's in the title of the subreddit) issue raised in the original post but so many people here really don't seem to give a shit. Fuck the pronouns and fuck your feelings. While you whine about this rubbish there is REAL injustice happening so maybe stop white knighting for special protected classes that don't give a single shit about us.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 08:54 PM
0

I honestly think this subreddit and this whole movement is screwed because people seem to care more about taking up the cause of movements that hate us than staying on topic.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 08:51 PM
0

I don't care about the dog fucker's rights. I care more about MY rights than the rights of a protected class that seems able to get away with damn near ANYTHING. We need to focus on MEN'S rights here, not take up the causes of people who already have the limelight every minute of the day.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 08:48 PM
1

Actually EVERYONE mentions that, even when it's completely irrelevant to the discussion.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 08:44 PM
2

This is my biggest issue out of many with the modern state of chess. To be a Women's Grand Master you require a rating a whole TWO HUNDRED points below the minimum required to be an ACTUAL Grand Master. It's so fucking dumb and all it does is make the female players look silly.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 08:43 PM
4

She's always called herself a feminist but is remarkably distinct even from the harpies of her own generation. She's generally pretty based. Feminism was all the rage back in her day and who knows which of the six million definitions of feminism she subscribes to. It's a terrible movement but is pervasive enough for reasonable people such as Paglia to identify themselves with it for one reason or another.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 08:40 PM
12

People could just realize that men are complex multifaceted human beings but NO, everything needs to be boiled down to fit into the spreadsheet, easy categorization culture we're all stuck living in. Men should be seen as PEOPLE. There is no room for rationality or justice when the "image" of a demographic dictates how they're treated by the law and the culture. Men aren't fragile little victims and we aren't big imposing monsters either. If people can't realize that, that's THEIR problem. Fuck …
/r/MensRights25/12/21 08:32 PM
7

If you're on this subreddit and still don't understand that being white is as bad in the eyes of many as being a man then there's not much hope for you. There's a clear hierarchy within the woke worldview. White men worse than black men, white women better than black men but worse than black women. They can't make their minds up about how they feel about Asians but their sexism and racism ABSOLUTELY go hand in hand and it's impossible to deal with these people if you don't know that. It's 2021, …
/r/MensRights25/12/21 08:27 PM
1

As I said, I'm not Christian. If I was, I guess I'd go with the Orthodox Church, idk. I certainly wouldn't go protestant because none of those churches actually seem to give a shit about the Bible, they only care about the Bible when it can be interpreted to support things they already believed in in the first place.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 07:09 AM
1

Errors according to one man, a man who NEVER wanted there to be a million little churches with their own wacky ideas. Even the Lutheran church, a church named after him, is not one that he really approved of. Protestantism stopped being "fundamentalist" and valid when it inevitably splintered into a million churches of luke warm feelgood Tuesday bakesale Christians. I myself am not a Christian, but can't help but laugh and see a whole lot of woke-adjacent behaviour and subjectivist thought in wh…
/r/MensRights17/11/21 11:17 PM
2

You should also look up the ESG rating and the giant hedgefund behind it because that might answer a lot of questions about why the world is so woke. Basically lots of investment capital behind companies that are both green and "progressive". It's kind of like a Ponzi scheme on a global scale and there's financial incentives for companies to conform.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 12:14 PM
2

You know, just normal government people who give ratings and make sure everyone's doing their jobs and shit. They see identitarian virtue signalling and they're like "OMG how stunning and progressive! Gold star for you!" Although the government here does indeed have diversity quotas so I'm sure they do have some form of diversity inspectors. I actually don't know whether there are officlal diversity quotas for private companies here but for any government agency like the BBC or NHS there sure as…
/r/MensRights17/11/21 12:12 PM
1

And it was the radical identity politics that destroyed it. All the competent people left because of the identitarians fucking up any efforts to plan and organize. The further left you go, the more fucked you are. I don't even know who Bolt is (I'm not Australian for one thing) but I know from your reaction to him that he's a big meanie conservative guilty of wrongthink. Every time a conservative or libertarian leaning person states a contrary opinion those on the left accuse them of being "divi…
/r/MensRights17/11/21 12:09 PM
1

I believe the woke people use the term "kink shaming" and see it as a bad/childish thing to do. Also pretty fucking weird to dig into someone's post history but whatever. Also weird that you think the amount of time I've been on this godforsaken site (longer than three days, sadly) somehow determines my knowledge. Oh well, since I am not woke I don't give a shit about you making fun of me for looking at anime tiddies (making me a horrible misogynist, according to many feminists) to escape realit…
/r/MensRights17/11/21 07:11 AM
1

I have NOTHING in common with fucking feminists. They are unironically evil people. There are many ideologies that I believe are stupid and lead to evil, but feminism is the only popular and prevalent ideology that I believe is in and of itself a demonic cancer on everything it touches.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 06:47 AM
1

This is just how women are in the army. They're usually short, often quite fat, and have absolutely no intimidation factor. They have to go the extra mile and just be complete pieces of shit to compensate for the fact that they're only in the army because of lower standards for women. The "men have fragile egos" lie is only believable if you haven't seen or heard of how fucking pathetic female drill sergeants/instructors can be.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 06:42 AM
2

It's a big virtue signalling bulletin board to say "look how left we lean!" Usually found in government buildings here in England (because British Conservatives aren't conservatives) but also in an increasing number of private businesses (presumably it looks good to any inspectors or gets a good ESG rating.. ugh).
/r/MensRights17/11/21 06:37 AM
1

This "men are going to adapt" logic will allow us to be pushed out of EVERYTHING. How about "men are going to say fuck you we're not getting pushed out any further"? That's just crazy talk, that'll never happen.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 06:23 AM
2

I also wish they could physically defend themselves safe in the knowledge that their right to self defence will be respected by the law. But I'm just talking silly utopian shit. That'll never happen because "YoU'rE bIgGeR tHaN hEr"
/r/MensRights17/11/21 06:19 AM
1

Toxic is a toxic word. There's nothing wrong with being masculine. Nothing wrong with being attractive to women. If you possess this elusive power, use it with care, for the night is dark and full of thots.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 06:13 AM
3

"I care about how men are being vilified until my own moronic biases prevent me from seeing what's right in front of me." My prediction that lefties are going to ruin this movement like they ruined that Occupy Wall Street protest is not ringing any less true
/r/MensRights17/11/21 06:02 AM
1

The term is RINO and they are at least 80% of the "Republican" party. Not that the lolbertarians are any better
/r/MensRights17/11/21 05:40 AM
1

You also don't get to cherry pick from the constitution, and the draft is unconstitutional. "Serve and stfu" has been the slogan of every society that views its men as disposable lemmings so fuck all of that for either gender
/r/MensRights17/11/21 05:35 AM
1

Protestant, feminist... I don't see the difference except that protestants claim to believe in God. Also the words "fundamentalist" and "protestant" don't belong together. Protestantism does to the Bible and theology what feminists do to "equality". They pick and choose what sounds good to them. That's why there are fucking 5 kajillion different flavours of protestant Koolaid in the US alone
/r/MensRights17/11/21 05:33 AM
2

Either the USA should deem the draft unconstitutional (which it is) and scrap it or it should be applied to everyone eligible for military service which includes women these days. Of course, they shouldn't be drafted to frontline combat because that would just endanger the poor bastards they end up in a squad with. Good luck getting wounded and being dragged to safety with a 90 pound woman at your side who's only there because the military has lower fitness standards for her
/r/MensRights17/11/21 05:31 AM
3

This is exactly right. Women are more likely to hit men because they know that any self defence on the man's part can be easily twisted as assault. So not only will she have the satisfaction of hitting the man, she will also have the power to ruin his reputation and put a stain on his criminal record if he's foolish enough to believe that his right to self defence applies against a member of the protected class of citizens to which the abusive hoe belongs. (I'm not a MySoGyNist, I used the word …
/r/MensRights17/11/21 05:26 AM
4

Never stop standing up for your beliefs. People will try to shut you up but we can't let them
/r/MensRights17/11/21 05:14 AM
2

It may be against the rules, but they can still do it because Reddit lets them, because Reddit hates us.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 05:07 AM
4

Freedom of speech is a thing. Now Reddit mods are allowed to suppress whatever speech they want since Reddit isn't a government body, but they're shitty human beings for doing so. In other words, people can say things that others don't like hearing and removing their ability to speak is the move of a coward and a tyrant, which is pretty much what most online moderators are.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 05:05 AM
6

By today's standards? Definitely. The rights of man (no pun intended) used to be a universal idea with people only debating over the methodology of establishing the rights and the full extent of them, but now it's very much a politicized idea in and of itself. Feminism is a tool of the left, which makes men's rights right wing by association. Again, this is according to the fucked up political compass of today.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 05:03 AM
6

What a stupid world we live in when being anti-abortion is horribly offensive. You'd think terminating a human life would at the very least be considered a topic requiring careful discussion and debate but nope, not anymore. Absolute clown world, man.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 04:59 AM
2

The second the original feminists started being straight up domestic terrorists was the second it should have been crushed. Feminism has NEVER been a force for good and it has never been about equality. Feminists intentionally dodged the draft, which at the time was a requirement for being able to vote, and they made no efforts to abolish the draft for men. there's no equality in that. It has always been a women's cause for the exclusive benefit of women and it was inevitable that men would star…
/r/MensRights17/11/21 04:51 AM
4

Exactly. They're not whiny losers who should be ignored (which is how they make people view us, btw) they are fucking demons who are being given more and more power over us.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 04:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter