TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mallago Archive

View 97 posts and 416 comments by Mallago on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1104

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights25/12/16 02:26 PM
688

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights12/08/17 01:49 AM
385

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights19/04/17 04:21 PM
185

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights25/03/17 01:14 AM
161

QuestionsMallago/r/MensRights29/04/17 06:38 PM
156

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights03/01/17 07:16 AM
148

DiscriminationMallago/r/MensRights24/06/17 02:11 PM
133

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights12/02/17 12:18 AM
82

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights15/04/17 09:45 PM
78

DiscriminationMallago/r/MensRights12/09/17 10:53 PM
75

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights21/04/17 05:44 PM
73

IntactivismMallago/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:38 PM
66

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights17/04/17 04:17 PM
60

Eastern CultureMallago/r/MensRights30/05/18 03:55 PM
59

IntactivismMallago/r/MensRights30/11/17 04:41 PM
49

FeminismMallago/r/MensRights09/04/17 08:16 PM
47

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights12/04/17 02:59 AM
46

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights25/01/17 09:19 AM
42

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights08/02/17 01:25 AM
42

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights06/03/17 02:06 AM
39

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights09/03/17 08:37 AM
37

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights09/11/16 10:03 AM
36

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights22/04/17 10:18 PM
30

FeminismMallago/r/MensRights04/11/16 03:24 PM
30

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights21/01/17 10:25 PM
29

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights26/06/17 12:02 AM
28

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights08/11/16 05:43 AM
27

FeminismMallago/r/MensRights16/06/17 05:37 PM
23

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights13/02/17 08:43 PM
22

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights06/11/16 12:11 AM
21

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:37 AM
20

Eastern CultureMallago/r/MensRights20/02/17 01:16 AM
20

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights10/03/18 03:11 AM
20

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights05/03/18 07:15 PM
19

FeminismMallago/r/MensRights14/04/17 02:16 PM
19

FeminismMallago/r/MensRights12/05/18 10:52 PM
18

Legal RightsMallago/r/MensRights30/12/17 08:09 PM
17

DiscriminationMallago/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:56 AM
16

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights25/05/17 06:58 PM
16

Mallago/r/MensRights17/04/17 03:43 PM
15

DiscriminationMallago/r/MensRights14/07/17 07:08 PM
14

FeminismMallago/r/MensRights13/05/17 10:59 PM
13

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights29/04/17 09:32 PM
13

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights16/03/17 01:53 AM
13

QuestionsMallago/r/MensRights09/04/17 03:24 PM
12

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights21/08/17 09:01 AM
12

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights14/04/17 07:08 PM
12

Mallago/r/MensRights08/01/17 08:44 PM
11

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:42 PM
11

Legal RightsMallago/r/MensRights23/02/18 05:22 AM
11

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights02/02/17 12:45 AM
10

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights07/04/17 10:59 PM
10

FeminismMallago/r/MensRights15/12/16 12:18 AM
10

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights07/02/18 04:50 PM
9

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights25/10/17 11:22 PM
9

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights27/05/17 04:40 PM
9

Activism/SupportMallago/r/MensRights02/02/17 07:25 PM
8

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights03/02/17 06:07 PM
8

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights23/06/17 09:31 PM
8

QuestionsMallago/r/MensRights06/05/17 02:36 PM
7

Activism/SupportMallago/r/MensRights16/02/17 05:11 AM
7

FeminismMallago/r/MensRights14/05/17 12:53 AM
7

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights21/03/17 07:48 PM
7

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights02/03/17 09:57 AM
7

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights01/01/17 12:04 AM
6

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights10/09/17 12:51 AM
6

Activism/SupportMallago/r/MensRights05/04/17 02:48 AM
6

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights11/08/17 08:07 PM
6

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights01/05/17 08:12 PM
6

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights11/11/16 04:35 PM
6

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights11/08/17 01:43 AM
6

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights03/03/17 09:52 AM
5

Activism/SupportMallago/r/MensRights08/03/17 08:31 PM
5

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights10/05/17 08:40 PM
5

FeminismMallago/r/MensRights02/03/17 09:26 AM
5

Activism/SupportMallago/r/MensRights15/04/17 09:25 PM
4

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights23/02/17 07:36 AM
4

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights11/05/17 01:34 PM
4

QuestionsMallago/r/MensRights14/11/16 09:53 PM
4

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights03/02/17 03:38 AM
4

Mallago/r/MensRights18/04/17 06:54 PM
3

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights20/05/18 01:34 AM
3

Activism/SupportMallago/r/MensRights07/03/17 12:46 AM
3

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights02/02/17 05:32 PM
3

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights27/05/17 06:45 AM
3

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights26/06/17 12:58 PM
2

FeminismMallago/r/MensRights08/05/17 01:04 PM
2

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights05/05/17 09:52 PM
1

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights25/04/17 10:33 PM
1

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights12/04/17 11:39 PM
1

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights24/10/16 11:50 AM
1

False AccusationMallago/r/MensRights27/04/17 04:56 AM
1

Mallago/r/MensRights11/04/18 01:12 AM
1

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights02/05/17 01:20 AM
1

GeneralMallago/r/MensRights08/09/17 02:24 AM
0

Activism/SupportMallago/r/MensRights12/11/16 04:41 PM
0

Social IssuesMallago/r/MensRights15/05/17 07:47 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
15

When you are used to privilege, equality feels like oppression. Feminists often mistake female privilege for what equality should be.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 03:58 PM
11

Feminism is hate.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 03:52 PM
10

Firstly, I entirely disagree with the premise of your argument- I feel it IS the responsibility of a movement that claims to stand for social justice to the point of bullying other ideologies away to police themselves- it literally IS their self-described job to fight injustice and bigotry, so why not in their own ranks? Secondly, they do more than just not call her out, they SUPPORT her, invite her to events, encourage and spread her hate on social media, etc. Sorry but I think you're 100% wron…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 02:55 AM
6

Feminists seem to have a very similar psychological profile to psychopaths...hmm...
/r/MensRights28/04/18 01:13 AM
3

An ideology claiming to oppose different treatment of genders is now saying it's discrimination to NOT treat women differently. It should be obvious that political SJWism is not a movement done in good faith; it's manipulative and bigoted, and needs to be stopped.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 01:12 AM
-2

lol o look, another ASPD anti-MRA troll. its adorable how you think you arent obvious...
/r/MensRights14/04/18 06:11 PM
2

She was saying that they have received an obscene amount of money on their go fund me What? No she didn't, you're saying nothing. Can you provide a source for that please, or the quote in context? I know you're another psychopath anti-MRM troll, you're upvoting the posts you guys are doing, it's very obvious. That you lie makes it obvious that you are wrong.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 01:29 AM
1

You haven't said anything wrong, but I can still tell you're an ASPD troll by your language and speech patterns. inferiorbrains
/r/MensRights11/04/18 01:27 AM
1

I never started doing such, so what you saying simply doesn't make sense. I am only replying to your own aggressive comments- how can you construe that to constituting either stalking or harassing?
/r/MensRights11/04/18 01:26 AM
1

Lol, wittle psychopath beginning to break....there's it is, theres the dysfunction coming out...that's two you've missed now....it's starting to get funny!
/r/MensRights11/04/18 01:23 AM
0

Again, without offense....I feel compelled to ask whether you fit one of 3 circumstances A reading/learning disability Failure to complete high school/secondary school English is not your first language Can you truly not see how given the context of any and every quote and phrase in the article, that your statement is a misconstruction of the facts? Or are you simply being willfully disingenuous and misleading?
/r/MensRights11/04/18 01:19 AM
1

That wasn't the nature of your post, and there is never an age where girls are better at boys at any physical activity other than gymnastics. That you find me "angry" is amusing- you're simply not intelligent or well spoken enough to be angry at; you hurt the anti-MRM "movement" by making such transparent and logical flawed posts. But I do wonder- do you not see the fatal mistake in your latest argument? The massive hole that's easy to spot, and exposes you as a poster with disingenuous motives?…
/r/MensRights11/04/18 01:16 AM
1

It sounds like they are stressing that the fact that boys may score slightly lower in average on reading at this age should not be attributed to a lack of motivation or ability. Why do you see this as problematic? There simply isn't a means by which a sensible person could say what you said it good faith. There isn't a reasonable need to answer that question, the answer is inherent and obvious to any mentally competent adult with a typical neurological profile. Your inabilityo understand this st…
/r/MensRights11/04/18 12:57 AM
1

(which I was surprised to hear was the case) Why were you surprised? It's rather well established that boys earn lower grades at all ages in all subjects. Friendly advice- when you have such large gaps in basic knowledge in a topic as you do, it's probably best not to talk so much, but listen quiet and learn. I think this would benefit you greatly, you have much to learn and I think you're hindering yourself by speaking out of ignorance.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 12:51 AM
2

This women absolutely looks sociopathic You would know... Lol you're not fooling anyone with those upvotes, we know it's all coordinated and we know each of the users doing so. Ada initiative, the yellow network, jenn bossio...you know we've infiltrated everything, right? You should get out now... adding ammunition to feed stereotypes and fuel hate against women. Why are you saying that? No part of this post is misleading, and no part contains false information. It's a very sensible and accurate…
/r/MensRights11/04/18 12:42 AM
0

Lol, and you're #2 for the day...you know, when your speech patterns are interchangable, it's readily transparent that your words aren't organic, right? Psychopaths have a certain "ring" to the way they speak that once you learn to recognize it, it's unmistakeable. They are people whose brains are born broken, inherently inferior, so they arent able to realize it, but it's very easy to pick them off (as i've done to you here)
/r/MensRights11/04/18 12:39 AM
-3

Everyone, /u/contexistential is an example of a ASPD (psychopath) who is part of the anti-MRM network, and is here to spread manipulative and disingenuous criticism. Block immediately and no reply. Nothing about your post has any logic bearings- you don't write particularly well, and you seem to have trouble making coherent consistency with your points. Let me ask you, and I mean no disrespect- did you finish high school? I only ask because you don't seem to understand the structure of claims an…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 04:30 PM
5

Fox is much better than CNN now, it's like a reversal. I'm against democrats now because they are what I used to think of republicans as being. Fox isn't good but it's at least based in reality, CNN does nothing but lie constantly.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 02:54 PM
6

Honestly and principals mean nothing to anti-MRA types.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 07:37 PM
1

Thats a damn good point
/r/MensRights06/03/18 07:36 PM
4

It doesn't have to be added chemicals, it's just the effects of synthetic hormones. Steroids have a psychological effect on men- why wouldn't artificial estrogen have an effect of it's own on women?
/r/MensRights05/03/18 07:31 PM
1

j
/r/MensRights28/02/18 10:55 AM
3

Can you cite this study or article please? With the link? Is it from this Forbes article? Because if you look at the full data set, it the overwhelming majority of instances, men are charged more. Its misleading to present the case that women are charged more at any level remotely close to men; its an obvious and basic reality that male pay more for car insurance as a general trend. You might want to better check your own sources, because it mostly works against you.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 10:34 PM
2

But why, if you could do so with a retroactive charge? It doesn't make sense because it's not only unfair, it's inefficient. There are woman who have more accidents than men, so having retroactive charges at an individual level is the most cost effective way, as well as the most fair way. You don't need a general higher rate. Imagine if you started looking at statistics for religious affiliation and accident rate, or nationality and accident rate- would those be fair markers to adjust price for?
/r/MensRights10/02/18 07:46 PM
3

Well no, it's really a function of "disagreeing", if you're premise had a foot to stand on logically I might say that's ok, but to me it's very obvious that you're not posting in good faith and are likely part of whatever brigade came here last night. So weak, btw- they're so scared of open conversation because they know they will lose.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 04:48 PM
5

That doesn't mean it's not inflammatory. To me, it was clearly meant to antagonize, there's better ways to talk about that. To me, you are clearly being disingenuous there, there is simply no sensible way to say that post was inflammatory other than people with deep rooted biases who might have had their fee fees ruffled- but these feelings are not more important than actual issues at large, and I think pro-male posters are very appropriate and necessarily given the climate of hostile misandry t…
/r/MensRights10/02/18 04:39 PM
4

/user/lacklusetrfriend made their account yesterday. They are one of them. They're using typical anti-social maipulative language, block and do not engage.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 04:35 PM
12

14,000 would mean Russian women experience one of the highest murder rates in the world. Considering that the gender gap in life expectancy in Russia is one of the widest in the world, with Russian woman significantly outliving men, I don't think that's likely. Feminists control the narrative on these conversations and make up lies about this all the time. There's no question it's a valid issue, but to invent a number like 14,000 and present it like fact is just not right. There are about 14,000…
/r/MensRights03/02/18 06:50 PM
46

It's always telling to me that the same feminist women who use words like "mansplaining" are the ones who have decided that the only body part that doesn't need autonomy is the male reproductive organ,
/r/MensRights01/02/18 03:33 PM
1

It's always telling to me that the same feminist women who use words like "mansplaining" are the ones who have decided that the only body part that doesn't need autonomy is the male reproductive organ,
/r/MensRights01/02/18 03:33 PM
1

i meant, i actually think this new rule is happening because of trumps new tax law. obama didn't sign any tax law that kicks in in 2019, so it has to be trump, which is surprising and worrying.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 10:27 AM
1

Was this Trumps law? If it is, no good answer. This is an unpleasant surprise and not good for him at all.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 12:16 AM
1

Was this Trump? I hope not but I think it may be....I've supported trump because he was the only option besides SJW control of the country, but if he did this, that's bad
/r/MensRights27/01/18 12:15 AM
1

Was this Trumps law? Not good and very surprising if so
/r/MensRights27/01/18 12:14 AM
230

"Washing up" or similar housework really isn't much- its just like a teenager doing chores. If you're not working and earning income but live in a house someone else pays for, eating food you didn't pay for, driving a car you didn't pay for, etc, then you should do housework, and even then it doesn't compare to working and earning the money that supports your entire life. Living in someone else's house for free and complaining doesn't make you "better", it makes you entitled.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 04:10 PM
1

Intersectionality is a fancy word for hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 06:06 AM
23

It's rather obvious that one follows another, your achievement in one tier of education affects your qualifications for the next. Here's a good article from the UK: http://www.bbc.com/news/education-37107208 Education is a linear progression and everyone in a class gets the same lesson on the same day, so falling behind one year puts you behind for that year. Colleges accept applicants based on high school record, of which GPA is a large part of.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 05:46 PM
2

So, STILL all you can focus on, huh? A typo? You can't or won't comment on the story? What do you think about how this mother still has custody? Do you think that puts the child at risk? Why do you think she was given custody after doing that? Will you have the courage to address those questions?
/r/MensRights27/12/17 07:33 PM
8

So, not the case of child abuse? It's obvious to any reasonable person that the mother received lenient treatment because of her gender. And feminism is a global movement, what's happening in the UK is very similar to what's happening in Australia. The ideology is connected, so it makes sense anyway. But still, very telling, in a story about child abuse, your focus is on an irrelevant typo.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 07:19 PM
3

Lol bullshit, 9 upvotes that fast. It's obvious you guys are coordinating that... Such fragile things, feminist women! So that's what you focus on, the country, but not what actually happened? You just dismiss the story because of a reddit comment? That's really what invalidates the story to you?
/r/MensRights27/12/17 06:32 PM
27

At an individual level yes, but as a whole, feminism is the side that harms more than helps. It's a reasonable generalization to say because it's about the collective of ideologies, organizations etc as a whole, and the net harm or benefit of it.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 08:19 PM
1

No. It is not sensible to ask for a source for the logical statement that 12 years is too long ago to measure salaries today. And yet I did, and you've failed to provide a source showing that the gender wage gap has disappeared in the last 12 years. You failing to provide a source is NOT redirecting blame towards feminists. NO, that wasn't the point of discussion. You provided data on the average salaries of CEOs in 2005. But you don't know how that's changed in 12 years. It's out of date. Old f…
/r/MensRights22/12/17 08:01 PM
1

The "Fortune 500" is a list of the richest people, who may or may not be CEOs. (There's a Fortune Global 500 list of companies.) No. The article posted clearly states CEOs. It is not talking about the richest people, it is talking about CEOs. What you're doing is intentionally being disingenuous and responding to things I'm not actually saying hoping that people who would tend to agree with you read your comment history and upvote because it "sounds like" you're winning the debate, when in fact,…
/r/MensRights22/12/17 07:24 PM
1

You were wrong. I corrected you for it. Hence, I "corrected your error". No. What was I wrong about? I said female CEOs of fortune 500 companies earn more, which they do. You failed to provide any source that corrected that, you just started pointing out how there are only 21 or so female CEOs of fortune 500 companies. Nothing I said was wrong, you didn't correct anything. Wrong. Female CEOs make less. Source. I've said this like three times. A 12 year old source is out of date when talking abou…
/r/MensRights22/12/17 05:50 PM
3

My specialty :)
/r/MensRights21/12/17 10:31 PM
2

I just corrected your error. No, you didn't. You still haven't said anything that changes the reality that at the very highest level, female CEOs are the higher earners. Even if this trend was reversed at companies 501-1000, it still means that there is no prevailing factor that results in female CEOs being paid less than their male counterparts. It that was a widespread societal phenomenon, you'd absolutely see it at the highest levels. So, small as a sample size as it may be, it is enough to s…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 10:31 PM
8

Being aware of men's health issues is important, there should be research into male specific health issues like there is for women. Also, you could consider the economic impact being sick more often and longer and worse would have.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 08:59 PM
9

I disagree. Awareness of male specific health issues makesAdvocacy of research into gender specific health factors and development of treatment for them easier.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 08:59 PM
2

You keep stressing a point that isn't relevant. The number of female CEOs is not what is the point of the post, it is the fact that there exists no factor that created a trend of lower pay for female CEOs. Whether it was 23 or 230, if such factor existed you'd see it. 23 is more than enough for such a factor to manifest itself. It should be noted that many fortune 500 companies were founded by the male CEOs that preside over them. There's no sexism at play in Mark Zuckerburg and Bill Gates being…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 08:58 PM
2

This post wasn't about the number of CEOs that are female, it was about how there is no lower average wage for female CEOs at the highest level. Female CEOs are not paid less, that's all this article is about. You're just derailing with something completely irrelevant. I'm sure there's another source saying that the gender wage gap favors women among 500 cherry-picked individuals without mentioning they're an extreme minority. But it's not cherry-picked if those are the numbers. The data makes i…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 05:34 PM
2

Do you really not think it's obvious that today is a coordinated attack on the subreddit from you guys? Like, you're very transparent and your methods aren't effective. The sample size doesn't change that a female CEOs of the largest companies in the world face a pay disadvantage, because the average salary is higher for female CEOs. Female CEOs being paid less isn't a thing, which this post demonstrates.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 05:19 PM
2

Right, but so? That means nothing. That means they had the age changed while still working to reach the age it should have been anyway. It's not disproportionate, those women just happened to be over age 60 when the changed happened. The change wasn't undeserved, it was just what always should have been. They're only protesting loss of privilege. It's not unfair to lose what was unfair to begin with. They're just used to the favored status so equality feels unfair, but personal feelings have lit…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 01:20 PM
1

Just because they aren't fighting against equal ages in the long run, it's exactly what they're trying to do those affected by the changes now. I know they're argument, it's that women didn't have "time to prepare", but time to prepare for what? The ability to retire early? All it means is that they have to work longer. They say it's "unfair" because it's unexpected, but it's really just losing an advantage that shouldn't have been there anyway. So, yes, they are campaigning for unequal ages for…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 12:46 PM
3

Yes, but that in effect is a protest of the equalization, as that is what they are saying is unfair. And really, so what if they have to work longer? It's like how feminists say "equality feels like oppression to those who have only known privilege." Sure 65 feels "too old" if you're expected 60, but guess what, 65 is what equality is. They complain that those woman "planned out" retirement at 60..so they're losing out on an advantage of inequity. Hardly a valid complaint. They aren't being scre…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 12:44 PM
17

Yes, but that in effect is a protest of the equalization, as that is what they are saying is unfair. And really, so what if they have to work longer? It's like how feminists say "equality feels like oppression to those who have only known privilege." Sure 65 feels "too old" if you're expected 60, but guess what, 65 is what equality is. They complain that those woman "planned out" retirement at 60..so they're losing out on an advantage of inequity. Hardly a valid complaint.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 08:50 PM
10

That's not really true, I don't see that at all. A lot of MRAs are liberal leaning and we're not a conservative movement either. We're neither right nor left. It just so happens that radical feminism and the SJW movement are aligned with the democratic party, so there's a lot of overlap. It's dividing into a two-side debate but it's far more complicated than that. The MRM isn't part of right wing politics, yet we have a common enemy. It's similar to how the US and USSR were allied against the Ge…
/r/MensRights17/12/17 07:22 PM
1

There's clearly organization and malicious intent behind some of accusations happening now
/r/MensRights17/12/17 12:00 AM
1

Also missing from the story is how the accusation was clearly false. Pure speculation, but I bet it's something feminists/sjws do to hookup with guys just to accuse them later.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 03:48 PM
146

24? Please. 18 year old boys were drafted and sent to die in Vietnam.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 04:09 AM
5

What's the general attitude there like towards it? When boys are going through it do they talk about it? Is it ever discussed in society? Is there a gender difference in attitudes?
/r/MensRights09/12/17 08:25 PM
45

Your wife is where I’m from. So touch me again and I will slap you, the same way your wife beats you up,” the woman replied. That's interesting -what exactly is she implying?
/r/MensRights09/12/17 01:56 AM
3

It's not unacceptable that victims of domestic abuse to be left in dangerous situations and without protection because of their gender. No justifications for those laws.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 06:09 PM
1

That's why it doesn't matter that men can't find minimum wage jobs, because they have the overwhelming vast majority of earning wage jobs, and especially at the higher tiers. This makes no sense, youre blatantly ignoring the larger portion of the population and the fact that for a majority of men, the ability to have the economic means to raise a child is less likely. Another major flaw in your logic is that for the men in the higher tier, they'd likely to be married this sharing income anyway, …
/r/MensRights05/12/17 05:11 PM
5

No, that wouldn't be ample justification. There should be another way to protect women from malicious officers than leaving her at home with a victim of her violence. That law leaves potential victims of domestic abuse at risk. If so, it's probably a good indication that you hate women and don't think they should be treated like human beings. Bullshit. Supporting equality is not a sign of hating people for being born a certain way. I argue that thinking male dv victims shouldn't have protection …
/r/MensRights05/12/17 05:05 PM
2

The gendered nature of this case is the difference in response to the action. The woman was not arrested when a man would have been, which is why it is a men's issues. There are gendered-specific laws that amount to discrimination against men, hence specifically being male issues.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 02:54 PM
1

Actually, he isn't "surprisingly close to being right", he's completely right, and you're completely wrong. It is not equal, your premise is not correct. There is a gendered nature to this case, which makes it a mens rights issue. What you're doing is trivializing and derailing an issue that is not about women in order to make it about women. The thing is, not everything is about women. I'm not saying there isn't a place for discussion on women's issues in India, but this is not that place. Your…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 02:50 PM
6

It's not lies, it's true. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/relationships/love-sex/10-legal-rights-that-women-should-know/articleshow/50742542.cms https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Activists-oppose-making-rape-gender-neutral/articleshow/15049606.cms This is a good learning experience for you. Why not widen your perspective, actually read what people are posting, and see things from a lens other than your own? Now let me ask you, and I mean this completely without offense- di…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 02:48 PM
5

No, that is not correct, the opposite is true. Someone has already given you a list of reasons for this. It is the case that women abuse/assault men with little consequences, not the other way around. This is a men's rights issue due to gendered nature of it. If the genders were reversed, it is likely the man would have been arrested.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 02:43 PM
4

What does that reply mean? Like break it down, I don't understand it. You were literally given a list of legal disparities that favor women, why did you only give a sarcastic response? Are you unable to unwilling to properly address the points raised?
/r/MensRights05/12/17 02:42 PM
5

And of course there should be
/r/MensRights04/12/17 04:18 AM
7

Useless. Anyone can still sign even if drunk or lie, or just say they were forced to.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 04:17 AM
6

I've lived in London and I've met men in that situation actually, so it doesn't sound wrong to me. Pretty much exactly what op said. Some were homeless and said that they ended up on the streets after losing their job so I don't see how what you said makes any sense?Not to mention, the age for early disability is higher for men to. But not saying you're wrong, just what I saw when I was there. Do you have a source for any of this? People laid off at 55 earn more, and those with disability paymen…
/r/MensRights01/12/17 12:06 AM
8

Women touch men like this all the time...even minor stuff like servers touching guys shoulders would be considered problematic with the genders reversed. It's like there's a totally different unwritten rule for women touching men, small stuff like unexpected hugs, grabs, are fine but when men do it, it's a different story.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 01:09 AM
2

I think that's true to. It really is like a chapter of a history book. We HAVE to stop it.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 08:28 PM
4

Feminists would probably have a problem with this because it mentions both genders. Think about that.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 08:25 PM
59

Notice how she feels completely safe and entitled repeatingly beating on your door trying to physically assault you. This is the problem with "never hit a girl", society haS built in a completely impunity for one half of the population to assault the other. It's time to start publicly calling feminism out as a hate group.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 07:01 PM
6

It would follow the pattern of the WFP placing restrictions of access to food in such set up that men were excluded from receiving food. the haiti example in OPs post is one example of such pattern. it's part of the current wave of radical SJW feminism. it's sociopathic.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 09:49 AM
3

Feminists support this because they enjoy videos like this. Like they laugh at "losing" single fathers paperworks. It's a hate group.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 07:33 PM
1

Interesting, so what would the difference is answers given have caused?
/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:46 PM
7

Their definition is completely invented and runs solely on circular logic. It's nothing, it's just a convoluted flow of big words that sound "academic", but is just completely up and has no proof. The literally invented a definition that excuses their own sexism. It's just a debate tactic to shut down any opposing narrative.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:45 PM
1

Can you be more specific about that?
/r/MensRights21/11/17 06:45 PM
20

There is strong anti male toxicity within the SJW feminist movement, against men, and especially against white men. It's palpable if you look- social media, popular feminist writers, media, etc. I wouldn't be surprised to hear cases of feminist nurses intentionally gave male patients lesser treatment, even if it means dying. The radical elements of feminism are pure bigotry, and dehumanizing so that a white man dying isn't really seen as bad.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 09:26 PM
1

Yeah but this sub isn't dealing with actual issues that men are facing, it's just butthurt men raging because they're losing some power You are obviously not here in good faith if that is what you are saying. If you read the posts here, they are very clearly about issues men face, and not about men "losing power."
/r/MensRights15/11/17 06:31 PM
2

Lol you're one of the more hysterically silly trolls we get here You choose to ignore what affects a greater percentage of the population. Majority of homeless are male Majority of incarated are male Majority of unemployed are male Majority of early deaths are male 100% of permanently disabled vets who were drafted against their will are male. So no. For most of the population, men do not have it better. You sound like a fat mouse.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 05:45 AM
2

Lol before this post, I thought you were just stupid or a douchebag. Now I feel bad because I think you might be disturbed.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 05:41 AM
3

OP's post illustrated why the difference in mean average is not a result of systemic discrimination. Lol, twice. Or should I not trust these figures because there are so many male billionaires and millionaires distorting the statistics with their billions and millions? It is a mathematically reality, not an opinion, that earners of million dollar salaries will have significant impact on mean salary. You just keep ignoring clearly logical arguments that dismantle your own argument, and continue t…
/r/MensRights01/11/17 12:05 AM
1

Fuck right off, cunt! Lol, as he talks about maturity. Your comment history is an excellent illustration of the simple but sad fact that the deluded and stupid never realize how deluded and stupid they are. I have to say, I think it's a good thing we have trolls like you, it only makes our critics look worse. It's obvious the anti-MRM movement is falling apart and grasping at straws.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 11:58 PM
2

Lol he isn't reaching, and you completely failed to address his main point- women starting work today earn more than men. That couldn't happen if there were systematic forced working against women. The other things he listed weren't even necessary to take apart your argument- which he did in the first have of that comment- they were just "things to think about", which IMO are reasonable. You've already made the gaffe That wasn't a gaffe, it was a very valid and eloquent explanation you are still…
/r/MensRights31/10/17 11:52 PM
9

Someone makes an account for 11 days, then does nothing but post in MR trying to criticize the movement. We're clearly scaring them and they know people are realizing the truth, these trolls are a sign of their desperation. Look at their history, they even made that post about how names of rape cases shouldnt be released to the media to "gain our trust." They're so transparent. You'll notice they even have a similar format in their usernames, notice how many have underscores which is the _ symbo…
/r/MensRights31/10/17 11:50 PM
6

Sorry, but this doesn't really belong here. I get its to show how hypocritical male feminists are but its not really an MRA post.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 05:13 PM
1

An entire reply of avoiding the question- I've asked what you mean by "public narrative", and twice now you have not given an description of your own term. Are you unwilling or unable to do so? You are explicitly describing the problems faced by minorities in America I was referring to men, as by trends related to education, employment, homelessness, treatment in justice systems, etc, and the specifically individual gendered nature of each
/r/MensRights28/10/17 05:11 AM
0

I'm sorry but you aren't making any sense. Your vague, abstract claim is "common knowledge"? I don't remember " white male control of the public narrative " ever being an event or pattern of events anywhere in history. You cannot just make a vague claim- the nature of which is unclear anyway... The "public narrative"? What is that? What narrative?- and then support said claim by basically saying " o its obvious, everyone knows that." There are people who say it's "obvious" that 9/11 was inside j…
/r/MensRights27/10/17 04:13 AM
0

White men totally controlled the public narrative and dictated culture for many years Citation needed. This is an abstract claim and can't be used as a adequate piece of any narrative unless you can not only properly explain what this means, but provide valid evidence/studies to verify it.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 03:28 AM
1

As a follow up question, do you believe that there even can be equal rights amongst races/genders without white males feeling powerless or attacked? And what would that look like? Yes, it would look like a society where laws, detrimental practices & exclusions, and biases would not have gendered or racial factors or natures. Much more like an MRA than a feminist world.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 03:21 AM
1

His comment makes sense because its a realistic thing feminists would say. It isn't from his imagination, its an accurate statement considering patterns and past behavior from feminists. Sometimes, things are not so simple as to be able to provide a direct source for, but are rather the product of logically constructing an image from patterns and evidence. In this way, his comment made sense, your replies have failed to do so thus far. Actually, said treatment of white homeless men is exactly wh…
/r/MensRights26/10/17 02:52 AM
2

What about his conjecture can you definitively say isn't what would be an accurate description of what a significant number of self-identified feminists would say?
/r/MensRights24/10/17 07:58 AM
1

Did you? If not, how do you know? When there is no evidence of something, the burden of proof is to prove it so, does disprove it.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 06:26 PM
1

No, you did not read any articles implying that almost all deaths happened right away. That is ridiculous. Can you link that article?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:15 PM
4

/u/vodkakitty is a psychopath, do not engage, she is not here in good faith.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:14 PM
3

I don't think you'd see any specific articles on specific examples. The death toll was very high and food shortage was a major issue, so its likely that men starved who wouldn't have had they had access to food distribution.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 10:17 AM
4

Yes! You finally get it- didn't they teach you that it school?
/r/MensRights12/10/17 07:05 PM
13

Hmm, first link suggests nothing about it intending to be funny, and you're second link is about a woman who performs FGM, not a man. Perhaps you made a typo?Also, you can't say for sure that it isn't nervous laughter. It's a bit racist to assume that someone from another culture is happy to have a foreign news team "investigating". In any case, I agree that FGM is not something that should be humorous.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 07:04 PM
14

Can you provide a link to an example of FGM being laughed at? An article perhaps, or maybe video?
/r/MensRights12/10/17 06:49 PM
18

No, you are being anti-social and that logic does not make any sense. acting like FGM doesn't exist doesn't help men either No. There is no need to mention FGM when talking about circumcisions, just like there is no need to mention crime rates when discussing global warming. Unless you think they are comparable, in which case it would be sensible to mention MGM in conversations about FGM, not not to have any conversations exclusively on FGM. Do you believe that there not be any conversations exc…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 06:45 PM
27

You're derailing the conversation right now. This post isn't about FGM. If you think they are incomparable, why are you bringing up FGM in a circumcision post? What's the relation?
/r/MensRights12/10/17 06:37 PM
3

Yes, kiddo, if a mod deleted your comment, it still shows up in your post history. Lol nope, you're still lying, which proves that you deleted your post in an attempt to cover up how soundly you were beaten in that argument. It's a ridiculous lie, really.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:55 AM
3

Let me explain this to you since you seem to be new to Reddit: Lol! It's easy to see I've been a redditor for over a year. If a mod deletes your comment, it still shows up in your post history. Nope, lie. Are you just writing that so you can post it elsewhere?
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:52 AM
3

I didn't delete any comments. You can check my post history Lol, no, they are not all there, because the ones you deleted are gone!
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:42 AM
2

Well, if you're just going to keep lying about your own words, you obviously aren't a reliable source for anything!
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:41 AM
3

Well, obviously I can't provide a link to a comment or PM that you deleted. But you said that you (with some reluctance, I might add) cannot deny the deny points to most rape allegations being false
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:38 AM
2

I know what the link was I think you're lying. Why not post it quickly and prove that you actually know what you're talking about? What was my claim that he provided excellent evidence against? Good question, you write so poorly and provide such senseless answers, I'm not even sure you know! So, are you unable or unwilling to answer the question?
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:34 AM
3

You yourself said that you agree the data in the study irrefutably concludes that most rape reports are false. That was yet another comment. If you disagree, tell me what you think the study said. In fact, just to make sure you're reading the same one, link me the study you think we're talking about.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:29 AM
2

Lol, the study you replied to was the link. It's funny how stupid you look when you lie :)
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:26 AM
3

First of all, I didn't delete any comments. They must have been removed by the moderators Oo, so you admit that you did comment that you read his study? What comment would I be talking about that would have been removed? Lol, kinda digging a hole for yourself here
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:25 AM
3

Again? Lol, you literally just deleted your last comment saying you were "reading the link", which was the study...why are you lying?
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:20 AM
3

Please tell me what my claim was. Lol...er, you need me to remind you of your own claim? Sounds to me like you don't know what you are talking about
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:18 AM
3

Lol, you've already been given that evidence. Why are you still denying it? Why are you being dishonest? You've seen adequate evidence to prove most rape allegations are false- are you simply not able to understand data?
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:16 AM
1

But surely you should be able clarify your own point, as promised...
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:14 AM
3

What claim?? Lol, you don't remember your own conversation?
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:13 AM
2

Hmm,too me it looks like that is what he said. Maybe you didn't comprehend his post properly?
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:11 AM
1

He isn't getting overly emotional, and he never claimed the majority of rape accusations are false. However, he has provided excellent evidence against your claim.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:10 AM
2

Sounds like a typical sociopathic SJW. Classic ASPD behavior, especially the "are you nervous?" line.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/17 02:34 AM
19

Honestly I've never understood wanting a girlfriend. I'm 23 and I've never had a relationship, no desire for one now.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/17 12:37 AM
2

Whenever someone is defending circumcision, ask them if they know what the frenulum, ridged band, and meissners corpsucles are. When they say no, ask them "do you really think it's a good idea to defend cutting off parts of the body if you don't even know what those parts are?"
/r/MensRights22/09/17 09:27 PM
32

Enjoy the decline. Hell no. The mens rights and antiSJW movement grows everyday. I don't follow this rule, and I don't care if people make false accusations of misogyny. I'm right, I'm smarter than you, and I don't care. So try it. ' I'm noticing people are starting to get it more and more and more. I don't think radical feminism is going to achieve the "creeping domination" of gradually controlling society like they think they will. The cracks are already forming, and although they appear stron…
/r/TheRedPill15/09/17 07:52 PM
3

It's not stupidity, its intentional and calculated. They're sociopaths, they already know they're wrong. They don't care, they take pleasure in it
/r/MensRights14/09/17 09:19 PM
2

They literally say the opposite of what's true, accusing the FRAs of doing the very thing the women's coalition is. It's how their strategy works- they take what all the fair criticism of themselves would be, then twist it and redirect it in the opposite direction. So, any reasonable response to them just mirrors what they already said. So then, they can mockingly dismiss the response by saying "Oh, all you're doing is saying 'no, you!' to us." The hypocrisy is stunning The irony of that...but a…
/r/MensRights14/09/17 09:18 PM
1

There's another #resist, and its us.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 05:09 PM
4

Not surprisingly, the mainstream media has largely dismissed the red pill phenomenon. Coverage has mainly stressed the connection to men’s rights activists —the Red Pill forum on Reddit and the documentary, “The Red Pill,” are both about men’s rights. This narrow focus, however, misses the larger story. The fact that they in the media try and stress a connection with the MRM as if the MRM is a bad thing shows how off base they are. I do think TRP and MR is connected, and maybe should try reconci…
/r/TheRedPill13/09/17 05:08 PM
10

Your post is exactly what we need the mens rights movement for. An immediate solution for the devalution and demonization of maleness. An outspoken and public counter to the anti-male narrative is a great first step in psychologically mobilizing the general population to making necessary changes.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/17 05:43 AM
7

This recent conversation reminds me of the study a few years ago linking birth control and prostate cancer. Apparently estrogen finds its way into the water supply. https://www.livescience.com/17028-prostate-cancer-risk-birth-control.html I wouldn't be surprised to find this somewhat related in some way.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/17 05:39 AM
3

Which usually seems to be the same excuse feminist use. Observation is step 1 of the scientific method, people forget that.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 07:53 AM
2

Feminism today is such an obviously shallow and intellectually wrong ideology and why of thinking, its just disguised very well under superficial language intentionally constructed.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 07:12 PM
1

She quoted me and proceeded to make fun of me, calling everything I had to say as "fake news" and make me look like an asshole. She could have tried to rebut what I had to say, but she was silent the entire class. But she couldn't refute what you said, which is the difference. So she did the cheap, immature and stupid thing instead, which says a lot.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 06:25 PM
31

And remember, if feminists in the UK had their way, there would be practically no punishment for this girl. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/01/why-we-should-close-womens-prisons-and-treat-their-crimes-more-fairly
/r/MensRights01/09/17 11:46 PM
7

There are very striking similarities between SJW feminism language patterns, and that of manipulative psychopaths. I've been thinking it for a while now, I think there is a network of psychopaths who organize a sort of "core" within feminism. It's why you always see the exactly lines and arguments and anecdotes, whenever you get into a debate they have the same little passive aggressive language tricks. "I didn't say that" "You are obviously not open to communication so I no longer wish to conti…
/r/MensRights31/08/17 07:56 PM
60

I have a theory I'm believing more and more that the entire SJW feminist movement is run by a "core group" thats a network of people with anti-social personality disorder, aka actual psychopaths.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 10:40 PM
5

I mean, the gap in intellect between you and the next smartest commenter.... I couldn't keep my cool like you do, lol, I'd have lost my shit in that thread.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 04:27 AM
1

I wonder where SJWism comes from in a teenager-what makes someone decide to do it? Sometimes I wonder if it's the hormonal affects birth control pills have. Think about it, it's daily ingestion of artificial hormones- if steroids (testostorone) had negative psychological affects of men, why would this be any different?
/r/MensRights17/08/17 08:36 PM
1

On a side note, I thought Gilly was much prettier than I remember from past seasons. I've always found her cute, but this episode more so. Turns out the actor that plays her, Hannah Murrah, is absolutely gorgeous and they have to make her up to look worse. She's my new celebrity crush fur sure <3
/r/MensRights16/08/17 08:20 PM
2

The military can require cost for transgender surgery to be covered by the individual, they don't have to pay for the medical costs. If you do something on your own time and dollar, it's not an expense for the military.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 09:27 PM
1

I don't totally agree- we have a major public image problem, we should do what we can to dispel the misconceptions around us. If we want to increase our relevance and influence in the public sphere, we should join discussions like this.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 07:28 PM
14

The U.N has been totally taken over by feminists. They have a new campaign, "poverty is sexist", which essentially says that issues of poverty such as hunger, lack of education, etc, affect women and girls at a vastly disproportional rate. But this makes absolutely no sense, and is not backed by statistics. It's delusional to think that poverty somehow affects females more than males- if there is no school in the village, where would the boys go to school? If there is no food in village, how wil…
/r/MensRights25/07/17 08:47 PM
3

Stop attending university is letting them win. So men don't get higher education due to fear of feminists? No way.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 07:51 PM
1

This is great, and I think a more common attitude than we realize. The more people speak up, the more people around them to will as well.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 07:49 PM
10

A physically damaging procedure that removes the majority of erogenous tissue- the frenulum, the ridged band, and thousands of meissners corpsucles. It's a violation of body autonomy.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 07:45 PM
3

I've started using the women's restroom whenever the men's is full and it's one of those one person bathroom setups. I see women do it constantly in the men's, so now I do it and don't apologize for it.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 07:43 PM
1

Men are already asked to die in war, suffer the brunt of a dangerous or emergency situation, go without the same levels of aid from the government and organizations like the UN, are forced to be conscripted into the military... My dad has a bad knee and I'll never forget when a man offered a seat to a healthy woman next to him, leaving my dad to stand in pain. Why shouldn't a man with chronic pain- maybe from a wound they received after being drafted into Vietnam- get to seat down? What is the e…
/r/MensRights25/07/17 07:41 PM
2

The way she describes recognition for the son who almost killed himself as "rape culture " is just disgusting.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 08:36 PM
34

MRAs oppose all rape, unlike feminists- such as the ones in India who fought to keep raping males legal- who do not. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Activists-oppose-making-rape-gender-neutral/articleshow/15049606.cms
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:53 PM
15

The part of this that relates to men's rights is that in Singapore, same sex relationships between men are illegal, while same sex relationships between women are legal. Gay men are specifically discriminated against under Singaporean law.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:45 PM
1

Actions of the fearful and weak.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:44 PM
145

No surprise, the prime minister of Canada is feminist. That's what feminism looks like.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:19 PM
4

Specifying race and gender is pure bigotry.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 02:46 PM
6

If this scenario would switch the genders ( girl calling the guy a dad and the guy trying to hit the girl multiple times) then the outcome would be a lot different, and people would think the guy was mentally disturbed.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 02:02 PM
7

American medical textbooks often use the circumcised penis as the standard for education, so many doctors aren't even educated in natural male anatomy, and may not even know what certain anatomical features are.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 04:49 AM

Passive aggressive cunty type shit? I understand all to well. It's very encouraging that you're a high school girl who sees from an MRA perspective, tbh I'm very grateful that people like you exist, you're doing what's right for no personal gain and that's more than 99% of the population.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 03:47 AM
1

O yes, I remember the post! Insane world we live in...I honest think major civil unrest is going to happen in the 2020s, this is literally the early days of that. It's like we're living in pre-history.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 02:28 AM
1

Ah ok..what kind of egging on and teasing do they get? Like what happens?
/r/MensRights17/06/17 02:27 AM
1

Caveman? I haven't heard about that. and what's the anti-female group? we arent anti female- the core tenet of the MRM is not judging people for being born a certain way- just against feminism and its bigotry.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 02:12 AM
3

That is a such bullshit and should get her fired...it's fucking ridiculous, it's about time we really did something about this shit. These people are weak and we could physically take over the country from them in 48 hours if we wanted to...why the fuck do we let them do this?
/r/MensRights17/06/17 02:10 AM
2

So you said we shouldnt divide people, and they shouted that??? What did you say? You should ask them "So? what does that mean? If I had one black parent my opinions would suddenly become valid?" It's pure bigotry, the anti white-male sentiment.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 02:07 AM
3

Ugh...you should show him the red pill.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 02:06 AM
1

Interesting, can you be more specific? Like what do they say? What are interactions like? Do you like male students get fairly graded? How do boys feel about it? Sorry if I'm asking too much, just very interested.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 02:06 AM
2

I've been sexually assaulted by any reasonable standard (and someone literally told me "if you were a girl that would've been fucked up") By someone who I bet identifies as a feminist. When that happens you should ask "why isn't it fucked up that it happened to me?" Happens to me everytime I go out on a weekend night. Being groped, touched, grabbed by women, like they're entitled to.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 10:03 PM
2

Nice to hear, what part of the country is your school?
/r/MensRights16/06/17 06:43 PM
1

Ha, and I'm in Wonderwoman.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 11:45 AM
-1

Ah yes, that's something I've been saying for a while. We need significantly better organization if we're going to progress and have any kind of impact.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 04:00 PM
-3

I agree. I think it's time the MRM made a public move to denounce Trump.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 07:03 AM
94

It doesn't work to post an opinion piece from an ideological website as a support for an opinionated ideological claim. It's circular logic, as well as very hypocritical.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 03:37 PM
3

A petty, ignorant, bigoted movement.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 03:57 PM
6

O I agree, but it's her sudden tangent blaming MRAs and white men for the actions of a fictional character...this movie is a "mens rights anthem"? Since when? She just randomly finds a way to slander MRAs.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 11:12 PM
1

According to her, if you're white and male you automatically agree with him because feminism.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 10:49 PM
3

The sort of minds that want to operate a site like that are probably not very good at running a business. No surprise, but welcome news!
/r/MensRights10/05/17 08:10 PM
2

I think people hating on this have it wrong, this kind of thing should be welcomed and supported.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 12:42 AM
1

Wow, thanks, going through it now.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:07 PM
2

Radical Feminist Child abuse when the RdFem Hub was infiltrated and exposed. Woah, haven't heard of this- when was this? Any links?
/r/MensRights08/05/17 01:24 PM
24

May as well throw in half-life 3 while we're at it.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 07:51 PM
4

obviously referring to pressure from radical feminist organizations, But why would they want... He mentioned a study published by Kalman Liebeskind, according to which 24% of the male soldiers are defined as injured at any given moment in the mixed Bardelas unit, compared with 8% in Golan ah
/r/MensRights07/05/17 12:59 AM
4

The overall quality of the MRM is much better and more reasonable than almost any other sociological movement I've come across. While it's true that no group is perfect, and we're bound to have problematic self-proclaimed MRAs, I'm hazard a guess that a significant percent of sexist comments made by "MRAs" are in fact from anti-MRA trolls trying to make us look bad.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 11:05 PM
1

Agree on principal, but I think branding much more important than it should be- we live in the hashtag era, and that is how ideas spread the fastest.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 03:34 PM
9

Whoopi is really cool, I've met her several times. She's a little "feministy" sometimes, but she's pretty fair and an all around good person. Not SJW at all.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 10:51 PM
43

No, I agree. Men shouldn't be able to tell women what to think about abortion. Cool. I also think women shouldn't be able to tell men what to think about circumcision. How's that?
/r/MensRights04/05/17 10:49 PM
3

You have been elected Supreme Mother at r/feminism.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 03:48 AM
3

She's great! Thank you Cassie!
/r/MensRights01/05/17 09:00 PM
1

So far, everytime I go out on a limb and make a guess about this, I always end up being right. For years I've been saying eventually, random violence against men by people like this will become the norm. IMO, it's started today.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 08:48 PM
1

It seems that way, although there will be a more clear picture as the police work out more details.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 08:36 PM
20

I noticed this article to, the way they lie is conformation for me that the MRM is the right side- how it's not plainly obvious to others is something I just don't understand. It's why I'm a little unsure about The Red Pill documentary having that name, it could lead to confusion.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 02:30 PM
18

Especially poor at a time when girls outperform boys in education, leading to higher university attendance rates and lower unemployment rates.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 10:42 PM

Ah that's alright, sometimes I can't even bring myself to read anti-MRA bullshit because it ruins my mood for the rest of the day
/r/MensRights29/04/17 08:59 PM
22

I see your point, but vox is making it out to be more than just "many redpillers agree with the MRM", they are trying to present it as redpill=the mens rights movement, which obviously isn't true.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 08:13 PM
2

Wow, that's seriously encouraging.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 06:27 PM
61

It's not women who are asked to die in war, so it makes sense that a female leader is much less hesitant to go to war. Male lives are seen as disposable.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 05:17 PM
30

Hey, you can't blame them, they're constantly exposed to negative and dishonest perceptions of us. Times like that are a great opinion for education and invitation to the subreddit- say, "this is what we mean, things like this are very common, we're not bullshitting you or doing this for fun."
/r/MensRights27/04/17 04:18 AM
2

haha yes, a lot
/r/MensRights24/04/17 09:17 PM
1

lol dicaprio is about as far away from SJW as it gets, look up the pussy posse. he also had his face slashed by a crazy ex (Aretha Wilson) and he went through a lot of effort to get her jailed. deniro isnt either.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 05:38 AM
16

Eh, not really, she's quite fair from what I've seen. Do you have any examples? Plus, you know the show is completely scripted and none of the names and cases are real, right?
/r/MensRights23/04/17 10:51 PM
5

She's great! Were I president I'd appoint her to the supreme court as soon as there was an opening.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 10:50 PM
13

Whenever someone says they are anti-MRA, ask them why. The reason they give is either misinformed, or dishonest. Nobody who understands us would oppose us if they really wanted equality, and you know feminists study us better than anybody. And god, reading her twitter, it's scary that this party exists. Part of me would almost want to see what happens if they took power in the UK, so the rest of the world could see just how bad they are.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 09:42 PM
9

This is what will change the tide, people like this stepping up to do even though they know they'll be criticized and attacked for it. Good on him.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 08:58 PM
1

Yep, pretty much what I've been thinking. And not doing a film again is what I expect, lol I'm actually surprised I've made it this far anyway.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 01:05 AM
4

Honestly, I'm at the point where I'm ready for it. It's up to you guys if you'd rather I make a new account or stay off this one, but I don't care. I won't be someone who remembers myself as one who didn't when he could- I say bring it on.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 12:55 AM
1

Yes, definitely. Indie-sized projects like you'd see at Cannes and then never again are where the worst of the worst happens.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 11:19 PM
2

Difference is, I had to google her to see who she is. That won't be the case for me after this summer.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 11:11 PM
1

I figure I'll wait until I have some mainstream recognition, then drop an interview on live T.V, or Jimmy Fallon, or fucking the daily show, see how they swallow it...really let shit hit the fan, take it from there...fuck playing it safe, let's go to war.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 11:08 PM
3

But nobody can deny that Trump has spoken in a way that proves Clinton was right. Right about what, exactly? How does Trump allegedly witching positions on something prove Clinton right?
/r/MensRights22/04/17 01:50 PM
1

So, you won't contact one of the people who actually conducted the experiment for the hard data? Is it because you're a coward?
/r/MensRights22/04/17 01:46 PM
5

You're being intentionally and unreasonably difficult. The people who conducted the study are directly quoted by a globally ranked university website, that's a valid enough source. The top comment is as youtube video report from the Guardian, another liberal source. And here is a link from the New York Times, a very reputable source, also liberal: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/30/theater/he-said-she-said-gender-bending-the-presidential-debates.html?_r=1 Joe Salvatore, an N.Y.U. professor and o…
/r/MensRights22/04/17 03:24 AM
5

Here is an article from NYUs official website. https://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2017/march/trump-clinton-debates-gender-reversal.html Not even you can try to claim that NYU has a conversative bias. So you have a liberal and conservative source. Are they both wrong?
/r/MensRights22/04/17 01:33 AM
6

The study is pretty clear, lean of the website bewhat it may. Plus, logically, it makes perfect sense. I thought that watching the debates- would Hillary be criticized for calling Trump "nasty"? I don't think so.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 01:26 AM
30

Sometimes, nothing better fights feminism than feminism. I definitely believe that most people who support feminism are regular, decent people who just don't understand it or get caught up. The more open the radical leadership becomes with their bigotry, the more obvious it will become to everyone how they actually are.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 08:39 PM
1

He said he hates and wants to kill white men, gender specific.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 12:19 AM
1

He said he hates and wants to kill white men, gender specific.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 12:19 AM
38

Surprising that in a patriarchal society, a field such as 19th century painting entirely dominated by white men is so undervalued.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 05:53 PM
8

It's because they watch it that feminists are so afraid of it.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 03:43 PM
5

Their entire movement and style of debate is constructed on lies and distortion of the truth. They claim to be anti-fascist, but are in fact closer to fascism then any other mainstream political ideology.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 03:42 PM
2

Yes, I'll have to go find it, but her name is Jenn Bossio, if you google her name +circumcision it comes up, and it was posted about here (probably by me.) I actually remember calling her, and her answer to why men who restore and men who get circumcised as adults notice a huge gain/loss in sensitivity is that because men are emotional about their penises, they experience a placebo effect. Her study actually found that uncut men have more sensitivity to fine touch, but she dismissed that because…
/r/MensRights19/04/17 06:42 AM
1

Sorry, what is it exactly? I'll look at it now. These guys are just fucking infuriating, look at the shit I'm going through right now. I should probably just ignore them
/r/MensRights19/04/17 04:33 AM
3

What do you say? It's was literally intentionally done wrong, it's ridiculous. Any examples in your post history?
/r/MensRights18/04/17 04:36 PM
22

Reminds of the circumcision study by Jenn Bossio- a psychology major- in the university "sex lab" that had the bio explaining they take patriarchy and misogyny into account. They didn't even look at the foreskin itself in the study, yet "concluded" that circumcision has no adverse affect.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 03:22 PM
1

Of course! Thanks https://www.reddit.com/r/BadSocialScience/comments/659zfp/how_conservatives_argue_against_feminism_and_how/dgegv80/?st=j1n39dzr&sh=10a8dbbb eDIT- Just changed it, had the wrong link before
/r/MensRights18/04/17 04:55 AM
1

It's really great having you here Karen! I've had a rather amusing exchange tonight to. I must confess, I didn't always play nice :p I'd love to know what you think!
/r/MensRights18/04/17 02:38 AM
1

Your link provides no sources outside of feminist theory, thus making it invalid. Circular logic is not a valid source for any claim.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 11:56 PM
1

Again, the key is deductive thinking and reading comprehension. Obviously, it's extremely unlikely that any major political organization will release a statement or position advocating gendercide. It's far more subtle, and written between the lines with invisible ink. MRAs are those who know how to look and decipher that ink, the contents of which we then report to here.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 11:31 PM
2

I have to admit I'm really puzzled as to what's gotten into your head such that you are legitimately surprised to learn a feminist thinks prostrate cancer is bad. R/againstmensrights I've been an MRA for 7 years, and every year my worldview gets a little bit more hostile as I come across some almost impossible to believe bits of information. I understand the criticisms aimed at the MRM, because all of them come across as very likely to be valid to anyone who isn't aware of what we are aware of. …
/r/MensRights17/04/17 11:27 PM
1

I never didn't provide evidence for any claim, but for which claim in particular are you speaking?
/r/MensRights17/04/17 11:17 PM
1

Hmm. Well, I have to admit, reading I am aware that prostate cancer is bad The bit with Justin Trudeau is unfortunate makes you almost sound like a normal human. Not that I ever trust anything an AMR- r/againstmensrights, which is what i meant from AR- but that's encouraging. Perhaps you're more of an MRA than you know. (I mean, more likely you were out of options when I presented two uninterpretable sources, but hey, I'm in a generous mood.) If by some miracle you're actually just a poor soul i…
/r/MensRights17/04/17 10:56 PM
3

Lol if you check my submission history, my feminist bingo card has "source?" as one of the squares. You know it's obviously not organic, right? Like we know you learn common language and phrases from a common source, and none of your conversations are in good faith.... I mean, you don't think it goes unnoticed, right? Citation for prostate cancer: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/dcpc/data/men.htm https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/all.html According to the CDC, the 4 biggest cancer killers of men…
/r/MensRights17/04/17 10:27 PM
1

Can't support it? How so? I've given plenty of support, far more than any feminists has ever given for the existence of male privilege in the United States. It's a logical fallacy to ask for some kind of citation for a opinion formed on deductive reasoning. In a similar fashion to how an ethical argument has no objective source, deductive reasoning needs no objective source. She refuses to condemn it. She says feminists use the it on a regular basis. She has a history of belligerent tweets. I've…
/r/MensRights17/04/17 10:07 PM
1

Well not really, because the gender divide is actually pretty equal on both sides. Plenty of women here and men on the SJW side. It would more be a battle of ideology.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 09:36 PM
2

I'd honestly love if some kind of truce was reached where all socialists/SJWs/anarchists got one half of the country/world, and we got the other, each completely independent from each other. It would be interesting to see the reactions when white men start fleeing from their side into ours, and as we except them, instead of helping refugees fleeing violence, we're "aiding criminals", and as things get worse and worse, how the men there start slowing realizing what's going on, and their society b…
/r/MensRights17/04/17 09:12 PM
5

Anarchists are delusional. Where do they expect food to come from? Who is going to pay and subsidize farmers? Who is going to stock their grocery stores? Who is going to maintain running water? How exactly do they think it's going to work?
/r/MensRights17/04/17 09:07 PM
1

Typical, exactly what you'd expect. Yes, I've definitely noticed. It won't work, we're going to win.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 08:59 PM
4

I sincerely hope you reconsider suicide, and I'm happy to talk about whatever. I don't like giving lectures or the whole spiel, so I won't. However, I'll say this- you should stay alive for this and see it through. We're going to need people like you for the fight ahead. You were born at a time where you have an opportunity to be a part of something not just good, but necessary.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 08:58 PM
22

It's getting absolutely insane. I'm someone who wants to be left, but I can't deny that this is becoming more and more definitively left vs right, and it's obvious what side I'm going to be on. ALL of the insanity happening on the left is thanks to the feminist from the 70s. It's crazy that this is happening, I think things are going to get really bad, and I honestly think the MRM is going to have to take up the slack and step up to be the counter.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 08:47 PM
2

O, I couldn't agree me. Were it up to me, everybody in the world would read this sub. But we have to make sure it's maintained as ours.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 08:26 PM
3

At this point, man, I just want to be left alone with my assets and remaining time But even that may not be possible. It's getting close to the point where we can't even "just live" anymore. It's not just "o, well we shouldn't expect the same", it's a matter of access to basic necessities- healthcare, employment, education, etc. Things are staying on an even keel for now, but what about 15 years from now? Or 30? They may answer "o thats ridiculous, it's nothing like that, just look at government…
/r/MensRights17/04/17 08:26 PM
7

It'll happen more and more the bigger we get, but I think we're very close to escape velocity.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 06:47 PM
2

Sometimes, trends in sociology and that occur within ideologies aren't so easily shown with a single, clickable source of material. Rather, the idea that any feminists who want to kill men is pieced together by noticing patterns and common language within the feminist community. When feminists promote lies like prostate cancer is a relatively non-deadly cancer when it is in fact the biggest cancer killer of non smoking men-something you yourself undoubtably enjoy doing over at AR- or when politi…
/r/MensRights17/04/17 05:47 PM
3

So, this is the point where you run out of lies and other things to say, right? Why don't you go back to your hate forum and enjoy the delusional that it's all going to last.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 05:39 PM
3

Well, it's a relief to know at least a tiny minority of your assumptions are grounded in reality. That's a start! You should stick around and do some reading, maybe you'll pick up a few more.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 05:22 PM
3

Archive sites are good to keep just so we always have a record in case of deletion, as many here are saying. But I don't mind original links- if something is worth being posted here, we should want as many people to see it as possible.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 05:12 PM
3

That wasn't derailment; Correct. The derailment was you changing the subject to male privilege to distract... ...That's where I'll have to stop you right there. See, ordinarily, I like to assume that when someone displays a certain degree of literary proficiency, that they're capable of comprehending the complex nature typical of discussions on topics such as this, and as such can talk about a variety of related and relevant points and facets of said topic. The expectation is for a fluid, divers…
/r/MensRights17/04/17 05:01 PM
6

I mean this sincerely when I say it, so please , I hope you don't take it as a sign of disrespect- but to me, what you just said is an example of either blatant dishonesty or bottomless stupidity.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 04:44 PM
20

The problem is they already know they are wrong, they are bigots, so they want to be wrong. They carefully construct wrong arguments to sound right.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 04:31 PM
6

I don't mind it at all, our subreddit would become a host to a visual source of the difference in intellect, sensibility, and ethical natures of the two groups. Go through my recent history, the exchange between /u/Ttabts and me- it's unbelievable, the low the quality of language used by a respected name of our opposition.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 04:31 PM
1

Ah, now I see- your last post can be roughly translated to "Because I do not posses to intellectual capability to maintain my integrity in this conversation, I am going to cower and disperse." Which is typical of your ilk!
/r/MensRights17/04/17 04:28 PM
3

Huffington Post SA has removed the blog “Could It Be Time To Deny White Men The Franchise?” published on our site on April 13, 2017. But they did publish it.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 04:19 PM
6

Actually, reading the article, it seems you're right that she claimed not to have tweeted it. Yet she still condones it. she makes it clear that she does not actually want to kill all men. Really? Refusing to condone it is far from clear. The words and actions of feminists make it difficult to believe. If you were to explore the sub a bit better, you might see evidence of what we're talking about. But, you're the kind of person we're talking about, so what good would that do?
/r/MensRights17/04/17 04:13 PM
3

Firstly, the quality of my writing and expression of concepts far eclipse that of your own. Secondly, identify what I said that you believe is derailing, other than my mistaken have claimed that she owed to having tweeted the hashtag- which I still believe she did-and in what way that, to you, constitutes capitulation?
/r/MensRights17/04/17 04:10 PM
6

It is the men's rights movement, not feminism, that is the movement supported by evidence. What evidence do you have that male privilege? There is none, because any look at statistics supports the position that male privilege, as defined by feminists, does not exist.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 03:59 PM
7

Quite frankly, I don't believe her when she says that. I believe she made the post, and given her history, I believe it's logical to do so. Even if she didn't "I never actually tweeted it—but I don't condemn it, either." That's enough. The #KillAllWhiteMen hashtag is something that a lot of people in the feminist community use to express frustration. It's not sensible to say feminism isn't a hate group.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 03:55 PM
12

What's scary about this is that the OP obviously knows that what they are saying is wrong. This sounds very much like the writing of a sociopath, exactly like what you'd expect from the people who intentionally use flawed logic to argument against prostate cancer research and screening.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 03:45 PM
7

It doesn't make sense to ask for a citation in that context, I know it's just a disingenuous conversation tactic anti-MRAs use. There obviously doesn't exist a specific citation for that, it's an opinion and reality is more complicated that then. You're not being sensible and you're being intentionally disingenuous. Stop that.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 03:33 PM
8

Yep, actually, she did. She explained her actions were joking, and she received lots of support from the university student body. There is no debate that she did it, are you seriously suggesting the possibility that she never actually made that tweet? And I have to disagree that it isn't a significant part of feminism. There's a very toxic and radical element to feminism, behind much of the issues we discuss here. You should read through and educate yourself a bit.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 03:29 PM
7

Wow, almost encouraging in a way to see a reputable and more "formal" media source like forbes actually using the term SJW. Just proves that it's a very real problem, and is as bad and crazy as we say it is. Just insane. That they go out of their way to do something that harms men but offers zero benefit to women says everything about them.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 02:18 PM
17

Even if she is trolling, I bet t there are SJWs who think like this. This this woman was joking? http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/oct/7/bahar-mustafa-uk-college-diversity-officer-arreste/
/r/MensRights17/04/17 02:13 PM
1

Haha I have to agree, but it was a hell of a lotta fun. I used to go to southwark between 1-4 am with a couple of cans of spray paint and absolutely light up a 2 mile stretch, circle around to bank and Shoreditch, then go by the next day and watch thousands of people turn their heads. It become something of a mini urban legend around Southbank and the east end, I'd overhear people talk about it on the tube and pubs. It was great.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 02:27 PM
3

Those reactions mean that at some level, they know you're right.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 04:43 AM
3

O sorry, I should have known that. And yea, it's not a enjoyable subject to talk about with family, but I've got many of friends strongly anti-circ now. In general, I find that circumcision is one of the most effective ways of selling the MRM to people.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 04:37 AM
2

Sorry, what is MGM?
/r/MensRights16/04/17 03:49 AM
15

In fact, creating the justification and proving their anti-male narrative is something I think they try and provoke men into doing all the time.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 10:58 PM
1

The student union system in the UK is absolutely insane- remember that story with Bahar Mustafa and "kill white men" at goldsmiths?
/r/MensRights15/04/17 09:35 PM
32

UN women also were the ones to come up with the "gender mainstreaming" policy, which in practices translates into refusing food and aid to men. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/un-sets-up-women-only-food-aid-in-haiti-1884361.html
/r/MensRights15/04/17 09:13 PM
1

I agree, I've never really liked the name Men's rights activist, it makes it easy to associate us with sexism, especially with how the average, un"woke" person thinks. The MRM exists specifically to address male issues, but a more encompassing gender neutral term for a larger counter-SJW movement- or really, people who aren't falling for the insanity- might be better.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 09:10 PM
4

Since being appointed to the position Phillips has said she thinks men should be banned from standing for Labour in all by-elections I really hope the world reaches the day where it can look back at all of this and realize how crazy it was, else I might lose my mind...
/r/MensRights15/04/17 08:04 PM
11

How the "social justice" movement escapes recognition as a hate movement by society is just staggering to me.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 03:43 PM
8

Equality is exactly what the MRM wants. The reality of inequality is not what most people know- sexism and discrimination against men actually exists far more than most people know. When you look at statistics for things such as employment, education, health, homelessness, etc, you say that men actually fare worse than women. Society accepts disparities against men because of the perception of how inequality manifests itself.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 12:41 AM
5

I think it's great that they banned it. No better publicity than to people "you can't watch this because it's dangerous."
/r/MensRights14/04/17 07:13 PM
17

Perfect. These are the kinds of opportunities we need. It'll take courage, but nailing this and coming out as an MRA could be such a great statement. We need to start being open and public about what and why we are.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 06:59 PM
2

Because "traditional feminist theory" is nonsense.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 01:34 PM
21

This is why we exist.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 01:33 PM
5

Especially if we do our best to make it so...
/r/MensRights12/04/17 04:13 PM
1

Nothing, but it's so often the way that they do it, asking for sources after an opinion which isn't something you can site, but is rather a statement based on inductive reasoning and logic. And other times it's just a tactic to derail land stall the conversation. I get why it is someones job to educate someone about their position if they're trying to convince them of it's validity, but if I'm on my phone in an area with spotty internet, you really can't google "pension ages in Austria?" Feminis…
/r/MensRights11/04/17 04:14 PM
4

The men's rights movement, MRM, focuses on legal, social disparities experienced by people who are male because they are male. The documentary is about the men's rights movement. The red pill movement is a toxic movement teaching men to "free" themselves from women. It's related to MGTOW, and isn't really a movement for equality. We are related in that we oppose feminism, but other than that we aren't the same movement. I hear that they're changing and becoming more moderate and political, but I…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 07:34 PM
1

I think it might help people spot the patterns of debate and word constructs feminists like to use, everything is based on things they say.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 04:10 PM
1

Ok, a few people have said this, why do you think so?
/r/MensRights10/04/17 04:08 PM
1

Ken Ham Eh, I think. Ken Ham is sincere, just very deluded. IMO, anyway.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 03:38 PM
10

Just to say something mentioned to me in another thread, we have to be careful not to let this associate us with the actual red pill movement. The only thing I don't like about this movie is the name, Jaye probably didn't realize the differences, but we have to make sure people know we aren't that.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 02:02 PM
2

The only thing I don't like about that movie is the name, because, as you say, we are not the redpill movie.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 01:53 PM
1

I know, it needs to be at least 3 times as big.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 12:45 AM
7

It's scary to think feminists are teachers. You should hold any marks she gives you with suspicion- check your answers to everything, make sure she graded you correctly. Of course most would be English teachers, which means they can grade essays subjectively.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 12:16 AM
1

(ie; if your posthuman, your no longer human, thus lack human rights.) Well I see that as an easy one, the "post-human" label doesn't have to be taken so literally, it's the identity/sentience that has rights. No one is going to say "well, now that you're 150 because of new technology, basic morality and decency no longer applies." Just use the term "civil rights" and you eliminate that problem.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 11:31 PM
5

Their lines that I call "engrained response", specific things that I hear over and over again. The things and responses they say obviously come from somewhere, because there's no way the many different feminists I've talked to over 4-5 years all say exactly the same thing following exactly the same pattern organically. It goes back to my post- which everyone here called me crazy for, btw- that there has to be some sort of "core" or "hivemind" source, or perhaps multiple of such sources.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 10:44 PM
2

I know, tried as I might I couldn't enlarge it without the text getting blurry.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 10:03 PM
1

It's more the way they do it, asking for sources at unreasonable times, or for things that aren't "provable" but obvious. Example, false rape accusations are obviously more common than false homicide accusations, because how can you possible falsely accuse someone of murder? Where's the body?
/r/MensRights09/04/17 10:03 PM
719

The worst part about this is that she knows what she's saying isn't true- but she's saying it anyway. That's what feminism is. Sorry to hear of your experience, it's so much more common than people realize.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 08:37 PM
2

Think of the healthcare options for cis-men in a feminist controlled society.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 08:04 PM
1

This would be a great idea! I'm interested.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 07:12 PM
3

How would the supposed benefits of becoming post-human be shared fairly? I always say that's a very short sided view of the outcome of transhumanism. Why couldn't the same be said of modern medicine today? We already have those kinds of differences between 1st and 3rd world countries- would you not even try just because of the risk? One day a multi-century lifespan is going to be the norm. Whether or not it's in time for us is up to us. As for feminists invading a transhumanist society, that's e…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 04:06 PM
2

At the risk of offending; there isn't an element of L. Ron Hubbard to it, is there? Haha no, none whatsoever.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 03:31 PM
3

I'm the same way, I've always been liberal/democrat leaning until I started to realize what the left was becoming. I'm still naturally left leaning, but very much against the democratic party now that it's been taken over by radical elements.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 03:13 PM
7

This movie is great, eventually it's going to get out more and more. One advantage we have is a "floor" on membership- people will switch from anti-MRA to MRA, but nobody properly aware and educated would ever switch from MRA to anti-MRA. We're so obviously right once you look into things that it'll become undeniable, and soon, people will go from thinking "huh, maybe MRAs have a point to" to "wait...if feminists believe in equality, what are they protesting against?"
/r/MensRights08/04/17 06:40 PM
1

Plus, we know that AMR always lurks around leaving comments to post in their hate thread later.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 11:24 PM
9

Ha, I'm going around town tonight and I'm going to print this up and post it to some bathrooms.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 10:26 PM
1

I actually really want to do this. I'm an actor and I live in L.A, and I've often thought of an idea for a film set 10 years or so into the future where things get really bad and society is barely held together. Very tense, even walking to the grocery store is dangerous. White men end up hanging around each other almost like gangs, schools are more or less segregated, and the government is a fascist style SJW government. I always have an idea for an MRA-meets-a-feminist type movie, but not a rom…
/r/MensRights07/04/17 10:24 PM
3

I was going to say this. I take great solace in knowing that The Men's Right Movement is one of top quality and integrity. We don't twist the truth to our convenience, we don't try and mislead people, and we always make sure our facts our correct. There is a certain standard of quality we should always have.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 10:21 PM
3

Then they say you're trying to "make it about teh menz."
/r/MensRights07/04/17 10:14 PM
11

I've often thought about how at the end of the day, parenthood may be do more to do away with toxic feminism than anything else. If things get as bad as it will if they have free reign, eventually society will have to notice as functioning and day to day life becomes too greatly affected. And fathers, uncles, brothers, sons, partners, etc. People will notice, which is why it's good for us to position ourselves for when it happens.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 10:12 PM
13

She's really great, she's going to get so much criticism, yet she does it anyway.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 10:10 PM
1

What's needed in organization, leadership, and identity. Things like logos or symbols may seem superficial but are actually very helpful, once there is a more centralized structure, we will be far more effective.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 09:08 PM
20

Violence against men is a common female entitlement of the feminist minded.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 09:03 PM
1

Funny how that "mansplainer bingo" card had the "wild exaggeration" square. It's exactly the point- someone who knows about this says it, and o look, he's mansplaining.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 08:59 PM
5

He's saying exactly what we think he is, to. So many people are aware, they just need to be given permission to say it. I've been saying 2017 will be the year marked as the beginning of MRM mainstreaming, as 2014 was for SJW feminism. We're already 1/4 done, so let's get on it.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 08:54 PM
19

It's telling how aware this is. They construct these arguments very well, it's how you know they aren't just accidentally wrong, they anticipate responses. Endless stream of useless facts So, when we just say facts to point out how things actually are? What makes them useless? ok, so I guess [wild exaggeration] is what you want? Because they know that anybody actual aware of what they do knows how extreme and evil they actually are. "You hate anyone who disagrees with you" So it's impossible to …
/r/MensRights06/04/17 08:50 PM
5

It's sort of impossible to avoid doing these things. They construct their initial arguments in such a way that the only way to logically and honestly respond would be to violate one of the "points" on the card.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 08:40 PM
6

Brainwashing and mob effect. People will follow whatever they're told to, and the average person rarely gets overly political unless it begins to intrude on their own lives. People tend to follow whatever norm they're born into to- if you're born in Yemen, you're probably Muslim. If you're born in Ireland, you're probably Catholic.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 08:37 PM
14

Well, they already know what the film is, and that the film is right. The problem with SJW feminists isn't that they're wrong, it's that they're wrong on purpose. They know they don't support equality, they're sexists bigots so they don't want equality. It's pointless trying to convince them about the things they're wrong about, because they do them on purpose- they're bad people. They want inequality, they want to see an abuse of human rights, they want to see domestic violence, they want to se…
/r/MensRights05/04/17 07:42 PM
10

Truth is toxic to a mind of lies.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 07:41 PM
2

Haha while you're instincts are wrong, they sadly aren't unwise.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 03:52 AM
6

99% of the homeless people you see on streets are white and male. Councils decide who get housing and are feminist run, white men are automatically rejected. The new Mayor has written a homeless plan that specifically excludes men- not definitively, of course, the language is as usually convoluted and disguised- but that's the effect.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 03:18 PM
22

Say that you disagree with the entirety of feminist theory behind power structures, and don't consider it a valid theory- which it isn't. Call it womansplaining- which it is! How can women decide how it "actually is" for a man without violating the very "mansplaining" etiquette they constantly spout ? It's nonsense. It's an intellectually hollow hate group, nothing more.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 03:17 PM
3

The hypocrisy and contradictions of feminism is stunning. It's so anti-intellectual- how is it the mainstream power in the academic sphere? It's just staggering to me.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 06:05 AM
113

Anti white-maleness is one of the oddly specific tenets of feminism. It's very clever on their part because it's so difficult to explain to people "o yes, well they have this thing where basically they hate white males and always try to make anything associated with them negative, in London councils have made it so white homeless men can't get shelters..." you sound nuts trying to say it. Anytime you see a comment like that, you know feminism's influence lurks somewhere nearby. The whole article…
/r/MensRights02/04/17 05:50 AM
14

A man has no parental instinct, The one's who die to protect women and children? It's just surreal how it's like this. How can people possibly tell you you're wrong when you explain the situation? Feminism is a hate group and it's indoctrinated so many, it's a very real and scary situation the entire world is in. It's so hard to believe that even we don't think about it too much, but sometimes when I stop and reflect on "how things are", I feel panic. How will this ever stop? How will things sta…
/r/MensRights02/04/17 02:26 AM
21

And feminists say "o look how MRAs politicize deaths" like they said about us after Robin Williams. Yet they politicize deaths all the time, the entire BLM movement is politicizing deaths, which isn't wrong at all- politics is a tool to fix social ills, why not use it?
/r/MensRights01/04/17 07:03 PM
25

Is it something talked about in Canada? Like would at a dinner party of the "general population", if the topic was brought up, would most people realize the disadvantage men have in divorce? Divorce means bankruptcy Wow, I'd like to hear a bit more into that. How so?
/r/MensRights01/04/17 07:01 PM
24

I would go back to every time the professor used the phrase "mother nature" and "mother earth" in class- which must come up sometimes in literature- and dock her 1% of her salary.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 02:31 AM
1

Respect to Politifact for saying the truth, to.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 02:14 AM
3

I love it, it's the kind of thing MRAs need to do more of.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 09:19 PM
1

Ha! No comment.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 03:53 AM
1

I can't think of a reason to believe that the CIA would have done that- what's the benefit? Why that?
/r/MensRights14/03/17 09:28 PM
9

That actions speak louder than words. Then a list of links of feminist politicians and organizations doing the opposite. Like Feminists in India arguing against legal rights for male rape victims http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Activists-oppose-making-rape-gender-neutral/articleshow/15049606.cms Feminists in Norway arguing against gender neutral conscription: http://www.newsinenglish.no/2013/04/22/norway-closer-to-drafting-women/ The feminist student officer, Bahar Mustafa, student welf…
/r/MensRights10/03/17 11:44 PM
11

Actually, in a way it would be great if something like this happened- men would suddebly be forced to recognize feminism for what it is. It would bring things to an instant head, and I think the faster feminism is "fully revealed", so to speak, the faster society rejects it. What I can't understand is how it's gotten so far already without people noticing. Sometime's I'll overheard conversations between groups of men who are democratic/feminist leaning, and it's just mind-blowing- how can you po…
/r/MensRights10/03/17 06:46 PM
1

This is what modern day feminism continues to be- petty, arrogant, bigoted a hate movement. Except they somehow with significant political and societal clout.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 06:20 PM
7

Mansplaining is it itself a sexist term feminists invented to always have a retort ready when someone points out their flawed logic or bigotry- it's a reflection tactic. Just think of the irony of women telling men that mansplaining is a thing, and that they are automatically unable to disagree because they are men.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 08:00 PM
1

The huge irony of feminists protesting against fascism is that they themselves are fascists. Do NOT use business sources So don't use real statistics, only use feminists sources which allow us to make up whatever we want to make up?
/r/MensRights09/03/17 07:47 PM
1

O I agree, I'm not suggesting a strike per say, more like events or marches- and not even protests, because that can be negative.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 04:04 AM
3

The moment when you realize that on the subject of social justice and sociology, the MRM is the academic elite.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 10:24 PM
29

What's funny to me is how "surprised" they all are. None of us are surprised, it's what we've known all along. It's crazy to me just how true that is that the MRM is viewed as crazy or backwards, when in reality where just years ahead of our time, perhaps more so then any other political/sociological ideology.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 07:36 PM
3

Well, how else would you expect me to be knowing how things actually are?
/r/MensRights07/03/17 03:08 AM
3

Knowing what you know as an MRA, you're really going to instantly dismiss the possibility?
/r/MensRights07/03/17 03:08 AM
13

For those who don't get why this might be sexist, think of this with different genders- imagine how a boy would be punished for even poking a girl inappropriately. But cause actual bleeding and injury to a male student, and nothing happens.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 11:08 AM
87

This is why society's "never hit a woman" trope is so dangerous women like this believe there is no consequence to violence against men. They just get away with it everytime they try. But this is exactly what feminists calling for no prison for women want.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 06:40 PM
1

I want to do something with that knowledge, I hate the feeling that I'm wasting an opportunity to make a difference.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 07:28 PM
145

Under the new feminist prison guidelines, I believe she receives 3 months community service.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 04:41 PM
4

It's happening everywhere. We really are in a historical, will-be-a-movie one day about time. I've been predicting that the late 2010s will see great social conflict as radical feminism and the MRM reach "critical mass", so to speak. Hillary vs Trump was sort of the next level of that. 2014 was when it began, 2017 is where it escalates. 2014-2016 was the rise of SJW, I think 2017/18 will be the rise of the MRM. By 2020 things will reach a peak, with the divide washing over into the 2020 election…
/r/MensRights14/02/17 12:23 AM
2

Very easy or very hard?
/r/MensRights12/02/17 07:04 PM
1

Wow, could you share some of the stories? I would stop to have similar conversations so I know what you're talking about, people should know about this stuff.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 05:59 PM
14

This is feminists directly attacking men's wellbeing. The hypocrisy is tremendous, but not unexpected- they don't miss the hypocrisy, they are fully aware of it and do it on purpose. While acknowledging the presence of female and indigenous-exclusive scholarships at Sydney, Grant said “what distinguishes those scholarships is they are in place to procure benefits for people who face structural barriers to receiving an education.” ...but men perform significantly worse than women in education, at…
/r/MensRights12/02/17 05:32 AM
14

Well to start, how about this: http://m.imgur.com/a/Rtijy Second page, in table 3. The line about plans for female and mentally ill rough sleepers "most closely aligns". http://m.imgur.com/OuiHxOE
/r/MensRights12/02/17 12:50 AM
1

Yea, I'm sorry guys but this post is just idiotic, this is clearly a joke. Having this on the front page makes us like ridiculous.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 12:55 AM
14

Every point feminists make about fascism, privilege,and inequality are traits and practices they themselves display.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 06:25 PM
5

Legally, 17 is the age of consent in Texas. No crime here.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 01:19 AM
8

Tbh I'm surprised we've lasted as long as we have without being banned. Reddit's mod teams are definitely pro-SJW, the tolerance they show the subreddit is respectable, something I can't say for other major subreddits (cough cough science) which are completely under feminist control.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 12:58 AM
18

I honestly believe there exists a strong correlation between modern day toxic feminism, and attitudes like these. In fact, it's likely the same feminists who insist on states adopting the Duluth Model who act abusively like this.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 12:56 AM
6

Some sources for both the US and UK http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1308508/Gender-pay-gap-U-S-reversed-young-women.html https://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/aug/29/women-in-20s-earn-more-men-same-age-study-finds http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2014/apr/09/genevieve-wood/what-pay-gap-young-women-out-earn-men-cities-gop-p/ http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/03/nyregion/03women.html?ex=1343793600&en=92838a503b49a9a5&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink http://www.indepe…
/r/MensRights03/02/17 05:53 PM
18

The wage gap is actually reversed in the UK for men and women under 40, which correlates with the ratio of university graduation.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 10:07 AM
1

I agree he's very problematic rather frequently...sometimes watching him is cringey like nothing else.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 09:54 AM
7

The feminist argument that jail sentences for false accusers make it more difficult for actual victims of rape is absurd. It makes zero sense to say that giving her jail time somehow makes it more difficult for rape victims to speak to police.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 08:24 PM
4

This is why feminism is so scary, they really are truly evil. People think I was crazy to say a Hillary Presidency could lead to a dystopian, ww2 type fascism, but this shows that that is exactly what these people are. She is one of their heros- torturing and killing a white man. They literally enjoy the idea, white men aren't human to them.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 02:33 AM
1

WiC does cover single fathers the same way, it's just the name. A feminist might say "well see, who cares about the name if it doesn't actually exclude fathers", therein being the hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 08:02 PM
207

Well in that case, I hope the college changes any sign or program for single mothers or violence against women to "single parents" and "victims of domestic abuse." The hypocrisy of SJWs never ceases to amaze me. Does the person who raised this issue have a problem with the WiC, only named after the single mothers it protects? That's insulting to the single fathers who benefit, to. As is the VAWA, or violence against women act, because that's sexist towards male victims of domestic violence, righ…
/r/MensRights23/01/17 02:22 PM
1

I would have done it if not for work, I still sort of regret not doing it. L.A, where I live, had a big march.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 03:44 PM
98

Remember- feminists are opposed to fathers rights groups on the grounds that "they don't care about the interest on the child even if abuse is taking place." Seriously, how the fuck did such an intellectually weak hate group achieve such societal prominence??
/r/MensRights17/01/17 08:43 AM
1

To what/who are you referring to?
/r/MensRights15/01/17 11:56 PM
68

Modern day "social justice" feminism is a hate group.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 08:06 PM
19

When feminists say things like "male entitlement" and "male ego", the hypocrisy is just astounding...
/r/MensRights15/01/17 06:43 PM
11

Of course, a political party is allowed to do whatever it wants in terms of nominees. But this should serve as an excellent indication of how bigoted and intellectually weak their philosophy is. This is one of many baby steps totals a fascist government and society with true discrimination and dehumanization of certain citizens. It's more about hate than progress, but a part of me actually likes it when things like this happen because hopefully, the general population will begin to see through t…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 08:02 PM
54

Does she care about unequal pension ages where men have to work an extra 5 years? How about male only conscription? How about the U.N's food distribution policy of ignoring men and leaving them to die? Or how UNICEF ignores boys in their education food programs so much, that now boys are the ones less likely to go to school in many African countries. http://www.ungei.org/news/south_sudan_3116.html In many countries, including the U.S where I live, younger women actually earn more than men. That …
/r/MensRights07/01/17 08:03 AM
193

Dear female students should also say: "You are the majority of the student population because the educational system favors you. You are also more likely to get a job immediately after graduation. Also, the whole thing about "drunk sex is rape" doesn't apply to you, so if he's had one too many, go for it!"
/r/MensRights06/01/17 08:22 AM
2

And where is his source?
/r/MensRights03/01/17 01:38 PM
6

Once in place, the courts then will have no choice but to extend the same rights to males That's what would have been so scary about a Clinton Presidency. Her court nominations, her veto power, the entire SJW wave behind her....who knows what might have happened. Courts don't change laws that discriminate against men now, it would be even worse.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 01:37 PM
1

ooo that poor kicker...
/r/MensRights01/01/17 12:39 AM
2

I sorta wanna see OSU and bama, although I'm a canes fan so I'm conflicted because I also sorta wanna see the ACC win. I think OSU with zeke wins this game, but without him I dont think they have any true elite standout type threats on offense. I've always thought JT isn't a big-game winner.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 12:37 AM
17

Some 200,000 men reported work-related stress averaged over the past three years compared to 272,000 women, according to the HSE’s figures. This means women were 1.4 times more likely to suffer from stress, anxiety and depression. 272,000 isn't vastly higher than 200,000 at all, yet only women deserve this special program to work from home? I'd say men in the UK face far more stress. They have a higher pension age, and laws make it far mroe difficult for men to be hired and promoted, which is wh…
/r/MensRights30/12/16 05:39 PM
3

O, don't get me wrong, I'm more than happy to expedite their trip to the trash heap of history. I'll even be a gentleman and carry their bags.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 04:31 PM
14

It highlights the attitude and bigotry of feminists. They will go out of their way to criticize a man, especially if white, even for the most nonsensical of things. It also shows how ridiculous feminism is, because of how petty and trivial issues they consider to be important are compared to the issues we discuss here.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 03:08 PM
3

This, along with that post about feminists protests of Passanger and Chris Pratt yesterday, is the beginning of their self-destruction and of the masses realizing how bad they are. Great! In my 6 or so years in the MRM I always predicted the late 2010s and early 2020s would be an era where the MRM would have to take serious action to save society from being completely consumed, but now it looks like feminists are going to do most of the work for us.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 03:07 PM
7

Very much like the "women are better doctors" study I posted a few days ago. This is exactly what feminism is- a dishonest, petty, bigoted and sometimes downright evil movement, entirely intellectually hollow and without moral and logical justification of any sort.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 03:49 PM
10

Title suggests that the charge would more a more severe charge with the genders reversed, which I believe is true.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 10:34 PM
4

O, I'm not celibate...
/r/MensRights27/12/16 06:59 PM
123

Female privilege. And to think feminists want even more lenient treatment of women within the justice system.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 06:59 PM
1

It did not. It mentioned the differences, but the differences were evidently not factored into the conclusion.
/r/MensRights26/12/16 09:19 PM
1

If you do not read the entire study, then you are not qualified to give an assessment of that study, nor correct someone who did read the study in it's entirety about said study that you yourself did not read. It is obvious that you are simply being disingenuous. Your last paragraph is ridiculous. The Your have suggested yourself that you aren't remarkable bright, and you write rather poorly and seem to have trouble communicating basic ideas, so it wouldn't surprise me that you miss the overall …
/r/MensRights26/12/16 05:52 PM
2

I know the tactic your using, you debate like a very typical feminist, and you're just being disingenuous. Stop that. Your post is nothing. It's obvious I didn't read or understand the article? How? Tell me what you mean, exactly. What have I said that leads you to that conclusion? You're just speculating on how you think the scientists in the study thought, you have done nothing to support any of your claims that I didn't read or comprehend the study. My assessment is absolute correct, and you …
/r/MensRights26/12/16 05:36 PM
6

But would undoubtedly reject a correlation-causation argument for any study showing men to perform better at something. Nothing about this study is valid in any way, shape or form.
/r/MensRights26/12/16 07:29 AM
6

The article itself, really. Although it's entirely possible he's being pressured or even coerced, I bet that happens a lot, I think this new breed of SJW feminism has tentacles everywhere, and nothing is beyond them.
/r/MensRights26/12/16 06:59 AM
2

Yes. The difference in less than one percent. The article ignores factors such as female patients preferring female doctors, which would matter as women live longer than men.
/r/MensRights26/12/16 06:03 AM
1

A very telling point to mull over when considering the reality of privilege, oppression, and how social conditioning and gender norms affect gendered altruism.
/r/MensRights26/12/16 05:00 AM
6

It's a bigoted, dangerous, and sexist opinion founded entire on faulty logic and disingenuous presentation.
/r/MensRights26/12/16 03:26 AM
5

What's perhaps even worse is the original author of the study is a male physician. The self hating male feminist is a very strange phenomenon indeed.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 08:37 PM
69

Just adding a thought- The study in the article showed a 1>% difference, well within the range of expected standard deviation. In other words, there is no difference. Also, could it be that the gender of patients plays a factor? Women are more likely to seek out female doctors, so a female doctor is more likely to have a disproportionately high percentage of same sex patients. As women live longer and fare better than men of the same age with the same illness, it would definitely explain why a f…
/r/MensRights25/12/16 02:48 PM
2

Such fragile creatures.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 01:00 AM
2

It's useless, feminists don't care about right and wrong. They know the things they do are wrong, they do them anyway.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 11:24 PM
1

ah, thanks, fixed it
/r/MensRights27/11/16 08:26 AM
4

and feminist set things like that up intentionally. they go out of their way to
/r/MensRights26/11/16 10:43 PM
38

If feminists had their way, this is how it would work for hospitals, schools, etc
/r/MensRights26/11/16 07:47 PM
1

How do people not notice this??? I honestly think there's a "silent MRA majority", like the silent trump voter theory, and so many people realize this and think like we do but are afraid to say anything. But once we crack something mainstream, or get something to go viral and people hear other people talking about, I think sooo many people will start coming out and saying they feel this way to.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 04:22 PM
1

Unbelievable..why do people still go for this ideology so obviously rooted is bigotry?
/r/MensRights26/11/16 03:27 PM
-6

TBH, I not only disagree, but I think the opposite is true.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 08:41 AM
6

Feminists are pro domestic violence against men, it's that simple.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 03:17 AM
4

Self defense is not radicalization. This trend is entire the fault of feminists.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 03:16 AM
1

Still, we should fall into the trap of enemy of my enemy. I like being to call the MRM an ideology of absolute good, and anything that taints that should be rejected
/r/MensRights15/11/16 03:59 PM
2

Some of the articles on Breitbart are highly questionable at best, if not downright awful. Idk how much Bannon has to do with those, but we need to proceed with caution before endorsing or supporting anyone
/r/MensRights15/11/16 03:14 AM
1

Eh, idk. I just saw this and it looks pretty bad. http://money.cnn.com/2016/11/14/media/breitbart-incendiary-headlines/index.html
/r/MensRights14/11/16 10:43 PM
1

Ah, well that isn't too hot then- I think the MRM needs to come out and clarify our positions, pro-gay rights, pro- choice, anti racist, etc, so as not to be associated with harmful views. I also think this is an opportunity for us to become a prominent social ideology in the US, one that can check Trump's actions and words.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 08:59 PM
5

agreed, but overall i think its a good sign
/r/MensRights13/11/16 11:37 PM
1

As a simple point, what about the MHRA activists who are not American? Same applies. This is a world war, and all theaters are crucial.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 01:34 AM
1

They don't have the physical capability. I went today, they are weak.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 01:27 AM
0

well yes
/r/MensRights12/11/16 07:53 PM
2

We go as a pro-MRA group, who view Trump as the better choice. But we look to engage people regarding MRM topics.
/r/MensRights12/11/16 05:43 PM
2

I see it as being bigger than just Donald Trump the individual. This election was a larger reflection of us vs them, and Trump winning represents a loss for radical feminism and a major halt of what would have devastating advances in their power.
/r/MensRights12/11/16 05:29 PM
3

Neither.
/r/MensRights12/11/16 05:09 PM
1

Hillary was liar who doesn't care whatsoever about gay rights, black lives, or women without her last name. At least I know Trump really would like to see a strong economy and national security.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 09:19 PM
8

This is what they are, this what the entire movement is constructed on. Petty, ignorant, low intelligence, emotional, judgmental- just read about the white feather campaign in ww1, these people are gross to the core.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 04:29 PM
3

Feminists are bigots.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 01:06 AM
0

Don Lemon is a CNN anchor. When you're being interviewed and someone says "So and so is a member of the KKK, and they endorsed you. What are your thoughts?", you really have to immediately come out against that. For me it wouldn't even be something I have to do, it would be instinctual. That Trump didn't have the sense to get that is a little concerning.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 09:45 PM
1

No, sorry, that is not the kind of attitude we should be about. The MRM is about issues and laws, not something stupid like that. Being born a certain race or gender is nothing to be pride of, there's no skill involved in being born.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 09:38 PM
1

Perhaps terrible is a little harsh, but if we're honest, he does warrant some of the criticism he received from feminists and has a long history of saying really stupid things in very poor taste. To not immediate denounce the KKK like he did in March with that whole David Duke nonsense, I mean come on....sure you don't know the guy in person, but when Don Lemon says "he's a avid and proud white supremecist" you really have to immediate disavow and disown that person. I know he doesn't mean to be…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 06:38 PM
3

Agreed, Trump isn't an MRA candidate so to speak, I more mean in the sense that people voted against the SJW movement, even if they couldn't quite place their finger on what it is that made them vote against Hillary. The sense that "something is up" is increasing rapidly.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 04:37 PM
2

Agreed, and we need to be careful about how the MRM endorses and supports him. I really, really hope he learns to be more tactful while speaking.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 04:36 PM
7

I can imagine a spike in discoveries of the MRA movement once people start figuring out how to make money from it. It will get exposure to mainstream media sources once it's profitable, or when someone else aware plugs it in, and it'll hit many people and make them think in a way that they rarely do and don't think they're allowed to
/r/MensRights08/11/16 05:51 AM
6

Yes, like another comment said, while I completely agree that title IX fails to protect male students, and is in fact implemented as a weapon against male students, I'm not sure we can directly link that to this particular case.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 03:16 PM
1

Ridiculous hypocrisy and entitlement from the feminist side, as usual.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 11:05 PM
21

Firstly, the MRM is not the same as redpill, at all. Feminists like to make the two sound like they are one in the same as part of their smear tactics, it's very frustrating. I don't see how it's possible for feminists to miss the hypocrisy and irony of the things they say and do, and really it's not- time and time again, especially on the feminist subreddits here, feminists of this new radical SJW wave have revealed themselves to be disingenuous, dishonest, and malicious., and often go out of t…
/r/MensRights21/10/16 11:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter