TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mammoth-Ebb-5670 Archive

View 0 posts and 34 comments by Mammoth-Ebb-5670 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It’s so they don’t have a weak moment and reach out for attention when they’re hitting a low because it’s wrong to lead someone on. If you were respectful, it wasn’t anything you did wrong.
/r/MensRights04/03/26 05:20 AM
1

Right, the over generalization is what makes it inaccurate. Hence my initial response. I like the points you make but there was a point where it was only men who had “rights” until a few decades ago. Even if they were born poor, they could still vote, etc. The Internet feminists today are often fighting the ghosts of battles already won. It comes off like generational trauma. Being disrespectful towards men because it’s “trendy” isn’t feminism in its literal form. That’s why I say they’re not ev…
/r/MensRights16/12/25 03:56 PM
0

I said what I said, you twisting things for the sake of arguing without the skills to understand what I’m saying isn’t taking this conversation anywhere. I’m to the point I’m not even reading what you respond with because it’s going a territory where it clearly displays that you like to be angry and not listen
/r/MensRights15/12/25 05:27 PM
0

I explained the difference. If you’d like to keep twisting what I said so you can cast a larger net of people to hate? Be my guest. In case you needed the reminder: Feminism - the movement to give women autonomy and independence from men. Misandry - the hate towards men in behavior, words, actions. Now by all means keep adding to the list of people who claim to be “feminists” and how they mean harm towards men then you continue to choose to ignore what I said about the difference
/r/MensRights15/12/25 04:51 PM
-3

Yes, because taking opportunities away from people based on their s*x is wrong. That’s not what the question was. The question was “are feminists evil” and the answer is no because actual feminist want independence. A lesbian does not want to have to marry a man in order to have food and shelter. There’s nothing wrong with that. If the men’s right group wants to make progress, it has to target the group hiding behind the feminism brand. If feminists as a whole is protested against as “evil” then…
/r/MensRights15/12/25 09:47 AM
-4

Feminism is to grant autonomy to women for the sake of their own independence if they prefer that life. That’s all it is. Everything you see today is hidden behind the veil of feminism, they hid in that group because their own would have never gained enough traction. Women can vote, have a bank account, buy their own home, have a career, etc. That’s what feminism is. The man hating isn’t feminism. People can want things for themselves without wanting it to be taken away or to harm others. Pretty…
/r/MensRights15/12/25 06:05 AM
-12

Actual feminists? No. Internet feminists? Misguided. Misandrists? For sure
/r/MensRights14/12/25 11:24 PM
7

I doubt anyone wants to die alone. They’d rather be with a solid companion or be by themselves if that’s not available.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 09:22 PM
14

The whole idea of being strong and independent was meant as be self sufficient and not expect someone else to do it for you. Kind of defeats the purpose to demand it.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 05:06 PM
2

There’s definitely a fatigue on both sides. The core of men’s rights and feminism was to support, not tearing down the other party. I think that’s the line between activism and radicalism. There’s a strange expectation put on relationships as a whole of how the “other person” should act. Doesn’t matter if it’s from the internet, media, or generational/cultural beliefs. We don’t have nearly as many expectations for friends, family, or people in the workplace (last one is iffy sometimes). The othe…
/r/MensRights27/11/25 05:10 PM
2

I used to work at Starbucks a long time ago and the cops that were regulars would talk about it frequently because of how many elementary and middle schools were in the area. One of the newer officers I asked how often is it teachers. I don’t remember his exact response other than they get a few calls every school year to investigate but what did stand out was he said the real issue is there’s way more child predators out there than people realize and most of the time it’s the parents. That gave…
/r/MensRights20/11/25 06:07 AM
2

It’s starting to shift away from that. It used to be women weren’t heard so they pushed and for awhile believed everything they said, now you have dishonest people riding those coattails and that crowd is growing and too lazy to cover their tracks showing they’re being dishonest. There’s a lot of disputes in the women’s community on this exact topic because it’s preventing women who actually need help to receive it because of how many are crying wolf. The truth always has a funny way of revealin…
/r/MensRights17/11/25 06:20 PM
1

It depends on what the person values in a relationship. If they’re looking for someone who is self sufficient and able to provide, then there may be hesitation when dating someone who lives at home. Even if the rational is to save money to get a house, we’re past the point in the dating world to simply take people at their word. But not everyone is looking for the same thing. It doesn’t disqualify you from having a good and healthy relationship.
/r/MensRights17/11/25 06:05 PM
4

Neglect is a form of abuse. Especially after there was a conversation and it was expressed as a need. Needs are important. They can’t be met all of the time but effort takes things a long way.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 12:56 AM
4

Women value a sense of security. It’s not that they can’t or don’t want to lead. It’s that if someone has walked ahead on a trail, then it’s likely safe for the next person too. How I understood “wanting to naturally follow” is preferring to know it’s safe. It doesn’t speak to their ability to lead or someone wanting to control them.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 09:34 PM
3

Yes, media is terrible for it. I wonder how many more things I have to unlearn that I still haven’t realize.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 11:16 PM
4

Being jealous is a normal human emotion. Telling what someone can and cannot do based off of feeling jealous is what’s controlling. Of course express concern and if there’s mutual respect you guys can talk it out. If you two talk compromises and aren’t able to come to an agreement then you get to decide what you need for yourself. You can accept what’s happening or move on and look for someone more likeminded. As much as we try, there’s no way to change another person. If someone is going to che…
/r/MensRights11/11/25 10:49 PM
7

I do it for anyone depending on the timing the other person and I get to the door. I don’t do it for any reason other than I want to be polite person regardless of how other people act.
/r/MensRights08/11/25 06:41 PM
1

I think it’s because the primary consumers of self help books are those who initiate going to therapy are women. So it’s a “hey this helped me, it will also help you” mentality. Kind of related: What’s interesting is I’m currently doing a research paper on emotional intelligence in relation to critical thinking. The people in the study who had the highest emotional intelligence had a higher sense of self perception and what they thought/felt in the moment. Those same people reported living in hi…
/r/MensRights04/11/25 04:38 PM
3

That’s not fully grasping what’s being said. Advocacy has never been about putting anyone down, it’s ending allowing someone to put you down. Actual feminism is about women having their own independence and choice to live their lives the way they want for themselves. Whatever this is, is hiding behind the veil of feminism. I’d go as far as to say, it’s actually hurting real feminism. It has to be sorted out from the inside. I personally believe respect is the core issue.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 09:01 PM
2

For it to be a standard medical screening, it would need to service a clinical purpose for the sake of insurance. It would have a better chance of being passed to make it mandatory to have paternal testing within a specific date rage in order to qualify for child support. If for any reason the biological father does not get the testing done or refuses the case could continue. Same if the biological mother did not get the child in to get tested (even if the dna was swabbed in the past) by a court…
/r/MensRights25/10/25 07:56 PM
3

This happened to me. I was all in and they ended things abruptly after refusing to have mature conversations to better the relationship. I didn’t even get to say bye to their kids and I didn’t even bring it up because “I don’t have kids and don’t know what I’m talking about” along with the “they’re not yours to miss” mentality. Never again. That was a different type of heartbreak.
/r/MensRights23/10/25 03:07 PM
1

I don’t understand why the government doesn’t pay the parents for child support for at least the same foster parents get.
/r/MensRights23/10/25 03:04 PM
6

It used to be “crazy cat lady” referring to a never married middle aged+ woman who never married implying she was undesirable and destined to be “alone” so she got cats to avoid that. Then they found out having an indoor cat meant high risk for exposure to Toxoplasma gondii which can absolutely alter one’s mental state including irritability and higher levels of anxiety.
/r/MensRights23/10/25 02:56 PM
17

After I learned about “Dead Internet Theory” it made more sense. People in real life don’t act like the people online very often. Only people who do are showing their hand that they’re chronically online.
/r/MensRights20/10/25 07:10 PM
1

You won’t understand things well enough from someone else’s perspective if you’re still filtering it through your own lens.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 03:05 PM
-2

What are they getting turned off by if they’re asking for that vulnerability? That doesn’t make sense
/r/MensRights16/10/25 03:00 PM
9

If women are able to identify they have specific needs different than men’s, then the obvious would be true the other way. There needs to be more research on men’s needs that isn’t patriarchal or matriarchal. It’s really something to discover. What do men need to feel stable within themselves that isn’t a quick fix and unique to them?
/r/MensRights16/10/25 02:59 PM
3

If they’re not willing or able to reciprocate the emotional space, they’re on the right track to understand what’s healthy, but still have some growing to do of their own.
/r/MensRights13/10/25 11:41 AM
2

Going through life needing any form of external validation to feel good about yourself is a recipe for disaster. It seems like being able to give that to yourself is becoming a lost skill. You’re right about a lot of them being in denial. They don’t realize seeking even a negative reaction from men is still a form of seeking male validation.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 12:18 PM
1

I work in a rehabilitation hospital. When a family member gets to that point, their home is not a safe place to be for them. He needs fully involved care at all times. Doesn’t matter if it’s a beloved spouse or a parent, there’s a lot of guilt surrounding those types of decisions. Seeing how much those patients need, I would never want my family to put themselves through that. They can love me best by making sure I get the care I need and they in turn take good care of themselves. I don’t want t…
/r/MensRights02/09/25 02:34 AM
1

If you want to take it deeper, ask ChatGPT to review all of your conversations and ask if there’s anything it’s noticed that you might not be aware of and to not hold back or try to spare your feelings
/r/MensRights19/07/25 04:44 AM
1

Women aren’t on dating apps nearly as much anymore. You’re likely talking to some bots so it’s not your skills that are the issue. Dating apps are fading out thankfully.
/r/seduction17/06/25 06:36 AM
3

It can definitely look like a backup plan if you’re already questioning the relationship. But for a lot of women going back to school isn’t about leaving. It’s about security, contribution, or just wanting to finish what they started. Life changes. Kids grow up, industries shift, and depending on one income forever isn’t always practical. Building skills or a career isn’t automatically planning for divorce. It’s planning for uncertainties. And honestly if someone is going to leave they don’t nee…
/r/MensRights09/06/25 05:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter