| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | So apparently its okay for women to watch porn but not for menThe porn I mentioned is famously non-consensual, which is why it has appealed to a certain sub-set of men. Also, to your question about off-screen consent, porn has a longstanding issue with abuse, violence, and problematic understandings of consent | /r/MensRights | 06/05/24 05:25 AM |
| -1 | So apparently its okay for women to watch porn but not for menWhat empirical evidence leads you to conclude that women have a problematic understanding of consent? | /r/MensRights | 06/05/24 12:30 AM |
| -1 | So apparently its okay for women to watch porn but not for menBeyond that being anecdotal, do you think the avg woman consuming this material conceptualizes rough play & domination (and by proxy consent) the same way men, who, if they do consume aggressive porn, tend to consume more non-consensual violent porn? Put simply, an alarming % of men struggle to understand consent and in the chance they engage in sexual assault, it is typically rooted in exercising power & dominance over a subordinated person/group, which is markedly different than what we see fr… | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 10:29 PM |
| -1 | So apparently its okay for women to watch porn but not for menYes, a small percentage of women relative to men appear to consume said category; however, we do not have evidence to suggest they’re consuming the type of non-consensual violent porn frequently consumed by men (which was the original claim). | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 10:17 PM |
| -1 | So apparently its okay for women to watch porn but not for menPopulation statistics is literally about inference. But speaking of inference, what crystal ball are you using to conclude that the author(s) are part of a “pink hair cabal” That kind of sounds like you’re dismissing data on a trumped up boogeyman instead of addressing the facts. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 04:33 PM |
| 1 | So apparently its okay for women to watch porn but not for menI’ll restate here as well — The claim was violent porn (ie, non-consensual). All the data show is that yes, a small % of women consumers like to watch consensual aggressive play. I’m not seeing evidence to suggest tho that women are watching the violent porn targeted toward men that is all about emphasizing power: violent “accidental” penetration, degradation ceremonies, extreme gonzo, etc. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 04:30 PM |
| -1 | So apparently its okay for women to watch porn but not for menThe claim was violent porn (ie, non-consensual). All the data show is that yes, a small % of women consumers like to watch consensual aggressive play. I’m not seeing evidence to suggest tho that women are watching the more violent stuff some guys watch that is all about emphasizing power: violent “accidental” penetration, degradation ceremonies, extreme gonzo, etc. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 04:27 PM |
| -2 | So apparently its okay for women to watch porn but not for men“When it came time for categories viewed more comparatively by women than men, Scissoring was +196% more popular, Transgender was +175% more, and Pussy Licking was +105% higher. Other areas of higher interest for women include Solo Male at +85%, Romantic at +59%, Bisexual Male at +47% and Rough Sex at +39%.” So what does it say that rough sex — of which women seem to emphasize that it be explicitly consensual instead of the hyper-intense gonzo stuff — is at the bottom of the list below reality p… | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 07:58 AM |
| -8 | So apparently its okay for women to watch porn but not for menThis study examined PornHub videos and found that “visible activities that were not aggressive but did not actively consider consent was present in slightly less than 40 per cent of the videos. Meanwhile, non-consensual aggression appeared in about 12 per cent of the videos, and less than 10 per cent of the titles suggested aggression.” We can further infer that men would be the predominant consumer of this material since women don’t typically consume aggressive material and those who do apparen… | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 07:44 AM |
| -3 | So apparently its okay for women to watch porn but not for menProbability sampling is the only way for obtaining generalizability to a larger population. That’s a non-negotiable point. Similarly, to make the point you want to make you need consumption data. If you have the studies to bolster your claim that women are into these intense fantasies then post them. And then empirically link it to actual consumption patterns (ie, show a significant difference in consumption of this media across gender). Until then, it’s conjecture at best, a misread of existing… | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 07:42 AM |
| -8 | So apparently its okay for women to watch porn but not for menSo is this a mainstream feminist claim or that of a handful of hyper-online loud folks? | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 01:17 AM |
| -13 | So apparently its okay for women to watch porn but not for menBut who is claiming that? What it seems like I’m seeing is folks suggesting that a non-trivial portion of male centered porn de-centers the woman as an equal participant and has non-consensual/abusive elements. Whether that’s right or wrong, that, to me, seems to be the claim. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 09:24 PM |
| -19 | So apparently its okay for women to watch porn but not for menThe OPs source is a non-probability sample so no generalizability and it doesn’t empirically show actual consumption patterns. Moreover, the women in the study who expressed preference towards aggression emphasized consensual aggression, which is much different than the SA/non-consent type aggression that permeates a non-trivial amount of male driven porn. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 09:21 PM |
| -23 | So apparently its okay for women to watch porn but not for menUsage data suggests different patterns: https://mashable.com/article/pornhub-women-searches-2019 | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 06:26 PM |
| -21 | So apparently its okay for women to watch porn but not for menDo you think there are differences in the type of porn the avg women consumes on pornhub vs. the avg dude? Similarly, perhaps subsequent differences in the cognitive & interpersonal effects of said porn consumption? | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 06:21 PM |
| 1 | Some "Feminists" assert that various women's health conditions such as Endometriosis and pain are supposedly dismissed by the medical establishment because of "Sexism".Gender bias in health care is a long-established fact: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/gender-bias-in-healthcare#examples Disbelief in symptoms and/or misunderstanding of female anatomy are chief culprits. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/24 10:41 PM |
| -7 | The bias and unfairness of Reddit's moderation.Yes yes yes, "they're all out to get you." Couldn't be the common denominator: you're a salty little boy who throws public tantrums about your sexual failures. | /r/MensRights | 30/04/24 06:52 PM |
| -11 | The bias and unfairness of Reddit's moderation.How many threads have you been 86ed from today for your broke dick manifesto? | /r/MensRights | 30/04/24 06:47 PM |
| -20 | The bias and unfairness of Reddit's moderation.The self-victimization of salty boiz continues. | /r/MensRights | 30/04/24 06:45 PM |
| -14 | The bias and unfairness of Reddit's moderation.Because you're a miserable incel loser. | /r/MensRights | 30/04/24 06:42 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter