TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ManAid Archive

View 0 posts and 41 comments by ManAid on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Is there significant genetic predisposition for 'negative' traits in men? There's significant evidence that there's genetic predisposition for certain behaviours in both men and women, How we value what's negative and what's positive, except for few more primitive drives, is entirely cultural. Is this ok basis for discrimination? Why/ Why not? It's not an ok basis for discrimination, because discrimination is in itself an irrational bias, Ideally you judge individuals strictly by merit, differen…
/r/MensRights26/12/12 12:54 AM
8

Being stereotypical is kinda of a requirement for any political comic these days, and Feminist groups are, as any other group, guilty of it.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 05:29 AM
36

Let's keep this sub for discussion. perhaps we should have the memes and comics on another subreddit.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 05:28 AM
5

if you actually bother to read the offending sex/relationships advice column that's got the blogger all fired up, it's fairly gender-neutral The blogger is quite explicit about what s/he is trying to refute, or at least point out, and it's nothing to do with the article it self, a little to do with the person who wrote it, and much to do with the first two links that were used in the DV section of the article as evident here: "she advocated two of the worst, misandry-filled ‘wimminz’ organisatio…
/r/MensRights16/12/12 05:41 PM
42

My advice to you if you're going to be involved in the MRM is to get rid of any of the assumptions that got feed to you about men from other women, from feminists or from society in general. Second, Take everything anyone says here with a grain of salt, demand sources, follow the links and do your own research.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 04:15 PM
34

I don't think history is best understood as one gender oppressing the other. I think it makes most sense if we accept that genders were pigeonholed into particular roles Ignoring all the literature we produce against feminist action, I think this is one of the biggest fundamental differences and the biggest cause of opposition between us and the feminists, and rightfully so.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 04:13 PM
4

Firstly, I think the breast/testicular cancer talking point is mainly used here as a counter for feminist narrative, especially to statements like "If men could get insert women specific issue here It would somehow be miraculously fixed". Secondly, Don't forget that unlike the feminist factoids about rape, for example the 'only 3% of rapists get sentenced' is, despite their best efforts of reframing and redefining, gender neutral, The same can't be said about the cancer talking point though, It …
/r/MensRights11/12/12 03:53 PM
43

Take notes and move on, We can't afford a vigilante srs style attack on her even if it's justified, nor do we need to. Just use her and her colleagues as evidence of feminists hate and misguidance.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 04:41 PM
5

I have noticed that we produced so much literature in such small period of time being the supposedly small group that we are, that i have seen it being used many times in arguments regarding feminism or gender issues in times debunking feminist myths sometimes by people who don't even that a men's movement exists. That's a big win for our cause imo.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:26 PM
1

but some people seem to object to the very idea of saying "I don't like your burger and here's why". Maybe some do, I doubt they're the same people that tell you to go make your own games though. I personally don't care, if there's a market for it, it's going to get made, even if it's a game about obscure sexual fetishes lol How would you respond to someone who got really mad at your position and told you to go make your own game instead of making a petition? But that's exactly what I'm doing, g…
/r/MensRights03/11/12 07:58 AM
3

Let's put this simply, if the interaction with the producer is personal then you're allowed to voice your feedback as much as you like, if you're part of a consumer-base, then you must know that mcdonald won't change it's recipe just for you, and here is why your analogy fails, any person who's a "gamer" is part of a consumer-base, personal interactions like your salty food in a restaurant analogy doesn't exist in the gaming industry, There must be a valid financial reason for a company to make …
/r/MensRights03/11/12 04:26 AM
11

Bad analogy, First, The food is too salty for you, it's not an objective fact that the food is too salty Second, media isn't produced for the purpose of your personal entertainment, they're produced for mass entertainment, so unlike the salty food that isn't fit for it's purpose, which is your personal pleassure, media has no personal purpose to fit, and some would argue it has no universal purpose to fit, it can be anything the designer want.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 10:51 PM
1

All i see here is a graphical update, character design is pretty much the same, only difference i see in the design is some of her feminine parts (specially her boobs) look more natural. I think she looks good, I've read that she has a bigger role in the story this time so designing her more human looking would actually be a requirement for more emotional connection with the player
/r/MensRights31/10/12 09:23 PM
5

That kind of tone is exactly what disqualifies this "movement" as a fair equal rights movement, and shows what it really is: You guys just really dislike women How is my statement that "SlutWalks" are the the breed of the feminist rape culture narrative make me against women or women's rights ? I didn't even say if i agree with the rape culture narrative of feminists or not, which even if i didn't agree with, It wouldn't make me anti women or anti women't rights no matter whether they're justifi…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:28 PM
5

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1241ge/brazil_howling_mob_of_feminists_attacks_a_man_who/
/r/MensRights26/10/12 01:42 PM
-4

We already have a thread discussing this.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 12:53 PM
4

Hah! and you think he's being judged unfairly for what he did. How you can seriously defend a misogynist because he is being SEMI affected by a double standard based on his own terrible actions is beyond me. I already told you that i don't care about who this person is, I didn't concede that he is actually a misogynist, I said that if he is, then it doesn't change a thing that he is unfairly treated, at least the way i see it. Also, why are you calling this person a misogynist ?, I thought this …
/r/MensRights26/10/12 12:51 PM
10

"violent feminists"; sure, omg, how dare they be anti-victim-blaming. Weren't the crowd in the video violent ? Aren't they most likely feminists ? (given that SlutWalks are the breed of the feminist rape culture narrative) Does being "anti-victim-blaming" permit you to physically assault people who haven't physically or even just personally wrong you ? When I discovered /r/mensrights I thought, hey, ever since my mom screwed over my dad, I can feel sympathetic to this cause. But the last days ha…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 12:14 PM
6

Double standard or not, he should not be defended. Find a decent person as a face for the cause not this misogynist. I'm not interested in who this person is, maybe he is a misogynist, I'm only interested in the standards he gets judged both legally and societally Do I need to go into how bad it is that he insulted there anti rape cause and all the victims at the march? So, this act is atrocious because "he insulted there anti rape cause", ok, does it warrant this kind of violent reaction ?
/r/MensRights26/10/12 12:10 PM
3

Your right, however this subreddit should not be defending him because he is a man, which is exactly what is happening here. I think there is more of an attempt by most people in this thread to point out the double standard, or at least a hunt for a double standard rather than defending this person. And that makes the atrocious act that he did okay? (especially as there were children there) Why is this act atrocious ? Is it because there were children around ? Then, why are there children involv…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 11:50 AM
2

Ask her, what happens if a woman who consented on the act of being impregnated whether by physical interaction with a man or by any other medical procedure changed her mind and decided to abort ?, should that be legal ? Also ask her, if she understands that the term 'cum without consent' doesn't necessitate that the women is the victim ?, a man believe it or not can cum without his consent.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 11:28 PM
3

Title: Legalizing Misandry: From Public Shame to Systemic Discrimination Against Men Link: http://www.amazon.com/Legalizing-Misandry-Systemic-Discrimination-Against/dp/0773528628/ref=pd_sim_b_4 Title: Spreading Misandry: The Teaching of Contempt for Men in Popular Culture Link: http://www.amazon.com/Spreading-Misandry-Teaching-Contempt-Popular/dp/0773530991 Title: The Manipulated Man Link: http://www.amazon.com/The-Manipulated-Man-Esther-Vilar/dp/0953096424
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:21 PM
7

Just remember, after all the misandry you see from tumblr feminists, SRS, RadfemHub and the A+ers on the internet, you must always know that not all feminists are like that (or NAFALT for short), there are still those subdivision C subsection 12 feminists that understand that men .. have problems too .... it's because of the patriarchy though. If feminism actually means equality for everyone, Im a feminist, but every post I read seems to be about hating men. Even if it does, you're better of ide…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:09 PM
2

The same thing applies to most of the memes here and reaction pictures at 4chan. if the person who has dragons dildos photoshopped around his face in /b/ wasn't the one who uploaded his picture in the first place and/or didn't agree to have his picture uploaded by anyone, then this person's privacy has been violated, and it happens all the time on both sites. I wonder what the "butthurtbasmentdweller.jpg" meme guy feels being humiliated on a daily basis on the internet (specially on reddit).
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:58 PM
11

It doesn't fit in their ideology that individual men can be hated by other individuals or institutions. the most charitable feminist will tell you in light of her/his held ideology of male privilege and women's oppression at the hands of "men" that the hatred of men is justified.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:43 PM
4

Don't let the feminists mould our movement into an ideology. people who do not subscribe to gender egalitarianism must be allowed to voice their opinions and concerns on this subreddit as much as they like, because if we start censoring, banning and shaming people of different perspective on gender issues in favour of a "politically correct" appeal then we set ourselves for easy consumption by our bigger sisters, by those who decide what's PC and what's not.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:10 AM
2

The removal of the clitoral hood is still considered to be a form of FGM even though some women opt to do it as it's said to increase sexual pleasure. The term you're using here (FGM) is already putting together many kinds of female circumcision as equals even though their severity differ radically. If you see (as many do) the removal of the clitoral hood as a form of genital mutilation then you must see male circumcision as a form of genital mutilation too. While the removal of the clitoral hoo…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 09:34 PM
2

at the very least credit men for building, nurturing and protecting human civilization if you're going to blame them for all that is wrong in the world.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:04 PM
3

It's still going, here. They archived it too so no worries.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 09:25 AM
0

A mansplainer presumes that the actual truth matters less than the calm confidence or rhetorical flourish with which he explains his version of the facts Such a great quote, It is true, any person who relies in his/her 's rhetorical flourish to explain his/her version of the fact is indeed devious. While being generous (and really tired) i will ignore your subtle attempts of establishing identity for the term by appealing to the authority of the "broader culture", that and your pathetic anecdota…
/r/MensRights14/09/12 09:06 PM
10

No, this man beat his girlfriend, he doesn't go around town with a baseball bat and beats the shit out of each and every women he meets, if he does then your sticker is correct.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 04:47 PM
22

She discovered an online community of women just like her, confiding deep-seated feelings of depression over giving birth to boys. She probably discovered SRS
/r/MensRights14/09/12 03:40 PM
16

It's not that the questions were loaded, it seems that the quote you choose for your title is one that's loaded, the author of the article never pointed out how researchers came to that conclusion, What counts as dreams of becoming powerful, popular or wealthy ?, are the 12% of boys who wanted to be policemen and 5% firemen being motivated by power or are they interested in helping people ? @op When I was a child, I wanted to be an astronaut. I wanted to be the wealthiest man in my country, funn…
/r/MensRights14/09/12 01:05 PM
3

Once aroused both men and woman will have to make equal effort to distance themselves from the cause of their arousal, And with that little nugget of universally known truth out of the way, it is important to note how this feminist writer approach the issue, and why this article like this post is about rape culture more than it's about about societal misandry I could very well analyze the whole article thoroughly and point out in detail why and how it is fallacious, but i'm in the middle of fixi…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:18 PM
5

Anecdotal evidence, appeal to emotion and characterization of the of the author's identity as a victim, these are the most oftenly used rhetorical devices in the fempire. These forms of rhetoric are to be disregarded at sight specially when debating delicate and controversial topics like sexism, institutional discrimination and general group behaviour, and that's because they're the easiest the use and abuse by people with in-group bias and interest.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 08:41 PM
0

First, I don't think Reasonability is a good merit to judge if what someone is saying is victim-blaming or not, I'd rather have the act of blaming be the merit to judge whether what someone is saying is victim-blaming or not Secondly, I already pointed out in my post what I think victim blaming is, It is the implication that the victim is responsible for what happened to him/her, and it is also most of the time implied post-hoc. Examples for clarification: "You should have prevented your rape by…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 10:23 AM
6

"Don't dress like a whore", even if it's presented in bad taste with the use of the word "whore" is not victim blaming, It is only bad advice based on the statistically unfounded assertion that what a woman wears can increase or decrease her chances of getting raped, Victim-blaming however is the implication that the victim Is responsible for what happened to him/her, second, victim blaming is almost always implied post-hoc (example: they wouldn't have gotten raped if they didn't do X, or did Y)…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 09:39 AM
3

I do not regard a woman dressed in sexy clothes partying in general society to be akin a drunk man flaunting his wealth in front of a group of dangerous people in known dangerous area x at 3 am. and you would be correct, just like man flashing his wealth in general society is not akin to a woman flaunting her body in a area known for it's high number of rapes just as i said in my post in the other thread, most demographic precautions are not based on race, sex or religion rather their based on r…
/r/MensRights04/09/12 06:39 PM
3

I have a question for you, would you regard a woman who flaunts her body in an area where more than the statistically average number of rapes occur to be as irresponsible as the man who flashes his wealth in an area where more than the statistically average number of robberies occur ? I also commented in the other thread specifically on the topic of regarding people as potential offenders, I'd be happy if you shared your thoughts on it. Link!
/r/MensRights04/09/12 04:48 PM
1

when someone claims that women should prevent rape by not wearing certain things or not going certain places or not acting a certain way The use of word 'should' is wrong on so many levels and it means either the person who made the graphic poorly articulated it or is deliberately misrepresenting the people he/she is critiquing, The word 'should' implies that the women's actions is the decisive factor whether the rape happens or not and putting all the responsibilities on the woman, which is not…
/r/MensRights04/09/12 01:34 PM
7

[TW] Rational Argumentation Following that line of reasoning we would conclude that individual sexism in both it's forms is just not possible in supposedly egalitarian country's like Norway, as there isn't in any institutional sexism. Although that's the vibe i got from this statement... hatred on an individual level is only problematic if there exists hatred on an institutional level as well ... I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and just say that you poorly articulated your thought…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 08:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter