ManKisserer Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-2	The framing of the movie Obsession is so annoying just watch the movie / read a synopsis if you don't get it, clearly lays out why it's viewed as rape	/r/MensRights	02/08/26 06:05 PM
3	The framing of the movie Obsession is so annoying I don't think he likes when he's called out for defending rapists :/	/r/MensRights	02/08/26 04:03 PM
3	The framing of the movie Obsession is so annoying It takes talent to misinterpret the movie so dreadfully. At a point it's safe to assume you simply didn't watch it. We really dont need to bend over backwards to defend film characters who objecitvely and continually rape their obsession just in order to play some double standard card that is infinitely more founded in other pieces of media. I get it you dont respect male victims of abuse and cant handle nuance but at this point its just sad bro just doubling down on defending rapists, what a wo…	/r/MensRights	02/08/26 03:55 PM
1	South Korea implemented women-only night buses Looks like they linked some data here https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347319866_An_Examination_of_Subway_Sex_Offense_Modus_Operandi_A_Case_of_Seoul_South_Korea Funilly enough the study supports the policymakers decision. Albeit in the context of metro incidents.	/r/MensRights	03/06/26 05:11 PM
7	European lawmakers have voted in favor of defining sex without active consent as rape. Tampering with a condom is by definition "stealthing", i.e. poking a little hole	/r/MensRights	03/05/26 10:58 AM
0	European lawmakers have voted in favor of defining sex without active consent as rape. Lots of countries have pretty outdated rape laws, especially in Eastern Europe. Even Spain changed the definition as recently as 2018 to be consent based rather than requiring proof of force / intimidation. This type of change helps encompass all forms of rape, notably being more inclusive for male victims Many also only very recently ctiminalised marital rape (i.e. Poland)	/r/MensRights	03/05/26 09:29 AM
8	European lawmakers have voted in favor of defining sex without active consent as rape. Stealthing / Stealthing adjacent forms of sexual assault are absolutely not on the victim, what are you on about?	/r/MensRights	03/05/26 09:22 AM
3	European lawmakers have voted in favor of defining sex without active consent as rape. Wasn't that always the case? Consent is an ongoing process, you can change your mind anytime during sex.	/r/MensRights	03/05/26 09:20 AM
0	European lawmakers have voted in favor of defining sex without active consent as rape. Not sure why this is being seen as controversial rape laws have been outdated for ages, ongoing consent should be the standard everywhere.	/r/MensRights	03/05/26 09:07 AM
7	An 18 year old woman can't date a 60 year old because "her brain isn't fully developed" It is truly bizarre. From OP's replies there's seems to be a trend of playing a victim. Especially with all the comments trying and failing to make direct parallels between things like race / sexuality, and then deluding themselves into thinking that since those are okay, 60 year olds wanting teenagers is also okay. It's so fantastically surface level.	/r/MensRights	23/04/26 07:25 PM
4	An 18 year old woman can't date a 60 year old because "her brain isn't fully developed" "It's female supremacy that I (40) get made fun of for wanting to date 18 year olds" This cannot be serious. If a 40 year old women wanting to snap up a fresh faced 18 year old perceptions would / should be exactly the same	/r/MensRights	23/04/26 07:17 PM
1	When women have intrusive sexual thoughts about children they aren't pedos anymore guys right....what do you think you're proving here?	/r/MensRights	14/04/26 10:38 PM
8	When women have intrusive sexual thoughts about children they aren't pedos anymore guys P-OCD has nothing to do with pedophilia, claiming so perfectly exhibits your ignorance on the topic, well done!	/r/MensRights	14/04/26 09:40 PM
3	When women have intrusive sexual thoughts about children they aren't pedos anymore guys Yes, you conflate two very different phenomena as I explained It would be best to start simple and for you to understand what OCD Is, and what is meant by "compulsive thoughts" or "compulsion" / what they entail	/r/MensRights	14/04/26 08:22 PM
4	When women have intrusive sexual thoughts about children they aren't pedos anymore guys ? https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10100145 In OCD, these thoughts are distressing and inconsistent with the person’s values, which reduces risk of acting on them	/r/MensRights	14/04/26 08:21 PM
13	When women have intrusive sexual thoughts about children they aren't pedos anymore guys The difference with OCD compared with the general population is just the reaction If anything they're less likely than the general population because they don't have these obsessive thoughts which cause excess anxiety and avoidant behaviors. This is basic stuff, you very clearly don't understand OCD, learn when to concede	/r/MensRights	14/04/26 07:57 PM
11	When women have intrusive sexual thoughts about children they aren't pedos anymore guys Data doesn't support that so I struggle to take that seriously	/r/MensRights	14/04/26 07:53 PM
16	When women have intrusive sexual thoughts about children they aren't pedos anymore guys You’re mixing up having a thought, with wanting to act on it, and those are not the same thing. In OCD, especially with harm or sexual themes, the thoughts are ego-dystonic, meaning they go against the person’s values, which is exactly why they cause distress If OCD made people “eventually do it,” then clinicians would see high rates of people with OCD acting on violent or sexual intrusive thoughts. They don’t, there isn't this pattern, meaning you are simply incorrect. And the claim that “even …	/r/MensRights	14/04/26 07:52 PM
12	When women have intrusive sexual thoughts about children they aren't pedos anymore guys Hang on, even simpler https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10100145 In OCD, these thoughts are distressing and inconsistent with the person’s values, which reduces risk of acting on them I can only pray you reconsider your dangerous delusions around OCD.	/r/MensRights	14/04/26 07:26 PM
19	When women have intrusive sexual thoughts about children they aren't pedos anymore guys Christ, you just keep linking studies you can't comprehend and making logic leaps the data doesn't support That research is primarily about violent offender populations, not OCD. OCD “violent thoughts” are not the same thing as aggressive scripts. You're conflating two different concepts. Look into the terms Ego-dystonic and ego-syntonic, that's the key thing you're consistently failing to comprehend. Ill try and put it as simply as humanly possible for you. OCD triggers anxiety, avoidance, comp…	/r/MensRights	14/04/26 07:25 PM
11	When women have intrusive sexual thoughts about children they aren't pedos anymore guys You posted a paper you didn't understand and made leaps in logic the paper doesn't support Don't refer to academic literature if you don't have the comprehension to understand it or the implications of the terms it describes...	/r/MensRights	14/04/26 07:13 PM
18	When women have intrusive sexual thoughts about children they aren't pedos anymore guys You're so close! What does the study mean by "compulsion"? What safety behaviours do ppl with OCD / P-OCD exhibit? I'll try again because this point rlly shatters your misinterpretation of OCD and you avoided answering it. "Are people with harm OCD more likely to be violent? / Do people with contamination OCD want to spread disease?"	/r/MensRights	14/04/26 07:10 PM
10	When women have intrusive sexual thoughts about children they aren't pedos anymore guys OCD compulsions aren't a cute thing to defend? What do you think the compulsive behaviours exhibited by ppl with OCD / P-OCD are? Or better yet what informed this opinions in spite of research being pretty clear on it?	/r/MensRights	14/04/26 07:03 PM
7	When women have intrusive sexual thoughts about children they aren't pedos anymore guys Stellar, unite in your proud ignorance in how obsessive thoughts / compulsions manifest in ppl with OCD So confidently incorrect	/r/MensRights	14/04/26 06:52 PM
9	When women have intrusive sexual thoughts about children they aren't pedos anymore guys I wouldn't bother, they don't know what the word means lol	/r/MensRights	14/04/26 06:44 PM
29	When women have intrusive sexual thoughts about children they aren't pedos anymore guys I figured you didn't have a clue what you were talking about but it's nice of you to make it known Theres real data saying 98 percent of the time they have compulsions. I think its reasonable to assume 100 percent do ans they're smart enough to be tactical about what they tell researches The study you linked found most people do / often have "compulsions". Not solely though based. (This involves checking thoughts, reassurance, rumination). You just don't know what the word compulsion pertains to…	/r/MensRights	14/04/26 06:41 PM
79	When women have intrusive sexual thoughts about children they aren't pedos anymore guys P-OCD has been a thing for yonks, they're not a danger to kids. Everyone who has these kinds of obsessive intrusive thoughts should get support and treatment, especially given treatment is highly effective in tackling it. There's really no need to shoehorn in some gender war garbage, there are easily better examples for that. It's not the same as pedophilia, nor is it related to pedophilia. People with pedophilic disorder have fantasies and desires to act on their urges. People with POCD are not…	/r/MensRights	14/04/26 04:54 PM
1	Would it be fair if women were given 32 paid days a year for having periods? How would you balance it? If someone's found to have lied they'd be investigated for benefit fraud People lying isn't an great rationale for denying people hugely beneficial accomodations	/r/MensRights	14/04/26 12:24 PM
2	Would it be fair if women were given 32 paid days a year for having periods? At that point do you disagree with sick pay / disability accomodations as a concept in general? These systems always have the risk of abuse, but to reject an accomodations based on the idea that a handful of people will forge medical focuments is weak rationale for refusing accomodations for all the women who should be entitled to this support. If you can point to the issues with Spain / Portugal's system it would be easier to engage with, otherwise it's just a baseless opinion.	/r/MensRights	13/04/26 09:54 PM
1	Louis C.K. was cancelled by feminists even though he asked for consent You assumed... people would do the digging to prove your own accusations for you, or just believe you outright because the person you accused was a man? I assumed people would care about the context. The accusation being against the man had nothing to do with anything. Mmm, the details on Schachners accusation are extremely vague, and I refuse to use a second-hand inconclusive text conversation as the proof your article claims it is. Him apologizing for his conduct to her is an admission of wron…	/r/MensRights	13/04/26 09:23 PM
4	Would it be fair if women were given 32 paid days a year for having periods? Seems to have worked fine in Portugal https://global.lockton.com/us/en/news-insights/portugal-introduces-paid-menstrual-leave-for-endometriosis-and-adenomyosis Same for Spain in 2023 To be eligible for this leave, the employee must provide the employer with a medical certificate confirming a diagnosis of endometriosis or adenomyosis accompanied by debilitating pain Unless people are en mass forging medical documents I wouldn't consider it a worry worth outweighing the benefits for those with deb…	/r/MensRights	13/04/26 09:14 PM
6	Would it be fair if women were given 32 paid days a year for having periods? It would just be for women with endometriosis and adenomyosis	/r/MensRights	13/04/26 08:44 PM
8	Would it be fair if women were given 32 paid days a year for having periods? It's just for women with endometriosis and adenomyosis https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cdp-2026-0050/	/r/MensRights	13/04/26 08:42 PM
1	Louis C.K. was cancelled by feminists even though he asked for consent Unfortunately, the reddit app has stopped allowing me to directly quote comments I reply to. Yeah I was getting some issues with notifications n stuff, weird. Do you have any links to accusations of him doing this, I assumed ppl would look into it more. Partly OP's fault for only presenting one instance when there were multiple. Paints the picture that Lous clearly had some ongoing problems which he seems to acknowledge. Comedian Abby Schachner called C.K. to invite him to a show and he started …	/r/MensRights	13/04/26 08:40 PM
2	Louis C.K. was cancelled by feminists even though he asked for consent It's not predatory behavior to ask for consent and then act on the answer that you receive Masturbating to women over the phone without their knowledge is rather predatory. The issues of Louis... asking women for consent, and the believing them when they say yes? It''s just being aware of context / implications around the situation. Would you take that kind of request seriously? Again Baby Reindeer is a fantastic watch, it really goes into how power dynamics can be manipulated in the comedy sphe…	/r/MensRights	13/04/26 08:21 PM
1	Louis C.K. was cancelled by feminists even though he asked for consent Did I say something sexist? All I'm doing here is disagreeing with defending predatory behaviour. Dismissive attitudes around how consent plays out and risky power dynamics just hurts male and female victims. The comment Im replying to here is also just pedalling bottom-barrel stereotypes as an excuse to try and gloss over the issues of what Louis did here. Women with debilitating periods should get something akin to sick pay, do you disagree? If you have issues engage rather than this weird dis…	/r/MensRights	13/04/26 07:41 PM
8	Would it be fair if women were given 32 paid days a year for having periods? Periods can be totally debilitating and incredibly painful, why shouldn't they be covered by something akin to sick pay? edit,: Op, you should've included the petition given ppl clearly aren't aware of the context of this being exclusive to women with endometriosis and adenomyosis. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cdp-2026-0050/	/r/MensRights	13/04/26 06:29 PM
0	Louis C.K. was cancelled by feminists even though he asked for consent He's done it to 5 women total, 1 was over the phone He invited them around and then asked to do it, it's an absurd request, they thought he was joking. Thinking someone is joking ≠ giving informed consent to engage with the sex act. As in a boss/manager role. He had to acknowledge because his career and life were being dragged through the gutter. I get that, but then knowing how the world of comedy works it's much less obvious. Reminds me of a fantastic series called 'Baby Reindeer' which really…	/r/MensRights	13/04/26 03:42 PM
0	Louis C.K. was cancelled by feminists even though he asked for consent How would you define it?	/r/MensRights	13/04/26 03:05 PM
0	Louis C.K. was cancelled by feminists even though he asked for consent Intoxication to the legal threshold of not being capable of providing informed consent concerning sex / sex acts. This is in the context of consent I thought it was obvious. It's funny you focus on one misinterpreted word rather than the point I made. So again, do you honestly think this form of consent was an informed and enthusiastic verbalization of wanting to engage in that activity? And if so do you acknowledge how much of an insult this mentality is to male and female victims?	/r/MensRights	13/04/26 02:23 PM
-2	Louis C.K. was cancelled by feminists even though he asked for consent The woman over the phone didn't the women he invited to the hotel room thought it was a joke / felt put in a predicament due to the power imbalance he himself acknowledged Consent is the voluntary, informed, and enthusiastic agreement to participate in an activity. Do you think that definition fits here?	/r/MensRights	13/04/26 02:05 PM
-1	Louis C.K. was cancelled by feminists even though he asked for consent What a disgusting approach to consent Consent is the voluntary, informed, and enthusiastic agreement to participate in an activity, It must be given freely without coercion, threats, or intoxication. Do you honestly think this form of consent was an informed and enthusiastic verbalization of wanting to engage in that activity? This type of backwater mentality is exactly why male victims are underrepresented.	/r/MensRights	13/04/26 11:29 AM
-5	Louis C.K. was cancelled by feminists even though he asked for consent No it's pretty clear, he asked to masturbate in front of them and that made them uncomfortable / masturbated over the phone to a woman who wasn't aware.	/r/MensRights	13/04/26 11:24 AM
2	Louis C.K. was cancelled by feminists even though he asked for consent You think Louis' actions here are logical? Masturbating over the phone to women who didnt consent, or asking to masturbate in front of coworkers? It seems very logical to laugh such requests off and not take them seriously.	/r/MensRights	13/04/26 11:24 AM
4	Louis C.K. was cancelled by feminists even though he asked for consent ??. It's not okay to masturbate to women over the phone without them knowing which he did, nor is it particularly sensible to ask multiple coworkers in lower positions than you if he can masturbate in front of them. Obviously they'd laugh off such a bizarre request, yet he then went ahead with it! This is common sense stuff. It's a misuse of power he acknowledges, and he leveraged that to feed his kink. There's nothing wrong with having a sexual niche, it's how he went about pursuing it which is…	/r/MensRights	12/04/26 07:21 PM
-5	Louis C.K. was cancelled by feminists even though he asked for consent This would work if Lous didn't continue to masturbate over multiple different women who didn't want it across his early career. He was cancelled because he was a consistent creep.	/r/MensRights	12/04/26 05:09 PM
1	I hate how much propaganda there is around women doing housework being unfair Yeah, your original post was misguided, it's data about unpaid tasks from men and women. Women still do more on average unpaid in dual earner dynamics. Ah, so when a man does unpaid labour it's... more valuable or something? How did you get around to quantifying that or do you just view the labour women stereotypically do as less valuable? What's dangerous about the usual male stereotypical household chores? You're reaching.	/r/MensRights	09/04/26 08:35 PM
0	I hate how much propaganda there is around women doing housework being unfair It's rooted in data https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/earningsandworkinghours/articles/womenshouldertheresponsibilityofunpaidwork/2016-11-10 Men do on average 1.4 hours more paid work, and women fo 2 hours more domestic work. And even In dual earner households, women still tend to do more unpaid work than men. This gap shouldn't exist, men and women should do an even amount of labour It's pretty obvious given historical attitudes towards domestic labour and the lack o…	/r/MensRights	09/04/26 09:06 AM
0	Data on False Accusations in India Read their methodology "Non Cognizable" and "Final Report False" were defined as Confirmed Malicious Non-cognisable means it shouldn’t have been filed as a serious criminal case and shouldn't really even be included Final Report False is the closest, but relies on police investigations, and doesn't prove malicious intent Final Report False estimates in court sit around 2-10%	/r/MensRights	08/04/26 12:47 PM
0	Data on False Accusations in India Look at the methodology they used, they tried to suggest any "Cases ended as FR Non Cognizable" & "Cases ended as Final Report False" meant that they were "proven malicious" when that isn't demonstrated. it mirrors weak police reports with strong court evidence which isn't appropriate.	/r/MensRights	08/04/26 12:42 PM
2	Data on False Accusations in India The methodology you used really isn't very good, it looks like you've maneuvered it to paint victims in the worst possible light, especially given the absence of attention to the nature of underreporting. Where did you come to the conclusion that "Cases ended as FR Non Cognizable" And "Cases ended as Final Report False" meant that they were "intentionally malicious"? Cases ended as Final Report False is probably as close as you can get but it still doesn't prove malicious intent at a court level…	/r/MensRights	08/04/26 12:40 PM