TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ManMoth2 Archive

View 1 posts and 209 comments by ManMoth2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

DiscriminationManMoth2/r/MensRights09/04/19 03:41 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

So, is the number for males to ring up so they can tell you how to not abuse women or something, or do they actually have a number for males being abused?
/r/MensRights13/11/19 05:20 PM
1

There's also the point that their brain cases were more voluminous than Homo Sapiens Brain capacity by itself doesn't mean much, because greater muscle mass requires a greater brain volume that isn't involved in higher cognition. They're about 10% bigger than us and had about 10% bigger brains though, so the body size to brain size ratios were the same, which suggests about the same intelligence.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 12:04 PM
1

They're saying that some women assume men aren't valid caregivers to the same extent to their children, and therefore only they are suited to this kind of thing
/r/MensRights29/10/19 02:21 PM
3

When I encountered resistance to picking her up, I'd probably be asking the woman if she's planning on kidnapping my daughter. If she didn't immediately relent, it might legit be warranted to apply some force at that moment, because they're actually trying to take your kid from you.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 02:11 PM
9

Traditionalism is also gynocentric, just another form of it. You'll see people protesting the stoning of women in Iran, for example, but what you don't notice is that more than 95% of those executed there are men. If a society treats both men and women badly, the media only cares about the women, then we get the impression that they're being specifically targeted.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 02:40 PM
9

Yeah, wasn't sure if the distinct ironic feel to it was intentional or not
/r/MensRights17/10/19 03:04 PM
10

Because we're essentially engaged in a war to define public opinion. If a critical mass is reached in terms of people becoming pro-MRM, that makes our success all but guaranteed. Feminism is one of the main opponents in this sphere, and these are feminist magazines. Their failure is an encouraging barometer of how said war is going. Not that I want to exaggerate their importance or jump too quickly to assume cause and correlation, but it's nonetheless always nice to see something that at least s…
/r/MensRights12/09/19 05:04 PM
135

I don't think we argue that child support shouldn't exist, more that it should be more proportional to the actual needs of the child and not absolutely unreasonably massive to the point of making the guy homeless, plus some other common sense conditions on it like only being mandatory if a paternity test finds you're the father etc.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 11:50 AM
0

Not a bad joke
/r/MensRights30/08/19 10:09 AM
2

My place does this. Basically, if you pass the coding tests and don't say something stupid in the interview, you're in. Consequently, we're something like 5% women developers, but the women we do have seem pretty competent.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 03:39 PM
18

Is it a joke?
/r/MensRights23/08/19 01:00 PM
24

I'm shocked she'd tell him in what I presume is a recorded medium which would instantly invalidate her claim to police. Note, can't access the archive link from work that people are so intent on using round here, so maybe she told him in person and wasn't that stupid, can't tell. Still, when you think about it, isn't it kinda dangerous to threaten someone with a false accusation in e.g. an email/messenger? What if you do that, then he actually does rape you? Void of very strong evidence otherwis…
/r/MensRights15/08/19 04:15 PM
3

So if being a feminist is sexist It's not inherently sexist to be a feminist; it's that feminists are either overwhelmingly sexist, or the movement as a whole is so sexist that by calling yourself a feminist you're providing support to a movement that is sexist. It's like saying a KKK member doesn't have to be racist, which is technically true.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 11:06 AM
4

Personally, I'm more of an anti-feminist/anti-sexist, so most of my attention is on negating (well, arguing on the internet about, in an attempt to change attitudes/turn people against) either existing sexist feminist policies, or proposed ones. In that sense, whilst both sexes can have "issues" i.e. circumstances that aren't favourable, the overwhelming majority of deliberate, official sexism is directed against men, hence my focus. But, very rarely, something is suggested that seems unfair to …
/r/MensRights15/08/19 11:04 AM
3

If it applies to both boys and girls, it's not a gendered issue. If they make a thread that only addresses when it happens to girls, then they made it one. If they made something gendered that wasn't, then that seems a valid time to point out that they're doing so.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 11:17 AM
8

It's bizarre just how bad they are with reading comprehension. Guy is saying that he wants someone who is both a good person and successful; posters are claiming that he doesn't consider her a good person because she isn't successful. Guy says it's hypocritical that he can be rejected for not being successful enough for a girl, but he can't reject a girl for the same reasons; posters claim that he's complaining about the girl rejecting him. It's like a fun-house mirror - reality gets warped past…
/r/MensRights12/08/19 06:17 PM
5

because you seem to be taking this a little bit personally No, I was using a personal anecdote as an example of the general case to which I was referring.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 04:22 PM
3

and very sociable so I'm good at spotting things like this. You realise socialising is generally a very superficial form of interaction? You don't immediately gain a deep understand of people's internal machinations as soon as you're good at making small talk or something Did you care about your girlfriends or do they mean nothing to you? Why are you asking? I haven't said anything that implied I didn't care about them
/r/MensRights08/08/19 04:04 PM
3

Again, I don't know where this is coming from. I don't know any emotionless guys, just guys who like to keep it private. I had a girlfriend once who I felt comfortable expressing my feelings around, in the end it seemed to turn her off and she dumped me. Now, I just keep them to myself, and have had far more success. Partly, that was a form of growth in the sense of learning that I didn't need external validation of what I felt, I can process it myself, and not have to depend on others.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 03:55 PM
2

This doesn't really make sense. Either someone has a serious mental condition like psychopathy, or they have emotions. Do you mean guys who just don't like to freely express them?
/r/MensRights08/08/19 03:50 PM
2

Well, the fake ID wasn't part of her charges, so she'd likely have been fine if she didn't run
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/19 01:44 PM
2

You can view the quote as saying that we should do more to include fathers, or you can view it as blaming fathers for being deadbeats lol
/r/MensRights06/08/19 10:37 AM
0

You mean an intersex parent?
/r/MensRights06/08/19 10:36 AM
2

Quote could just as easily be read as blaming them lol
/r/MensRights06/08/19 10:35 AM
2

Yeah, but there's no large egalitarian movement, so this is the closest we have
/r/MensRights05/08/19 02:26 PM
1

I'll never really understand people who had money but spent it. A bit of saving, and they could have enough for an indefinite passive income. Being free of work for the rest of your life would be a far greater priority to me than blowing money in the moment.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 01:24 PM
3

Don't worry, they've already redefined "minority" to a new definition to make it fit their nonsense
/r/MensRights01/08/19 10:20 AM
2

Also, misandry/misogyny is an individual attitude, not a systemic form of discrimination, despite SJWs trying to play at being the gatekeepers of word definitions.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 10:18 AM
2

I'd imagine a prison in any country that hot would be pretty dire lol. Not sure if they'd get air conditioning.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 09:50 AM
2

How many brothers do I need to lift?
/r/MensRights25/07/19 07:45 PM
1

Why would you even want to try to compare genders like they're a competition? The only winning move here is not to play
/r/MensRights19/07/19 11:48 AM
7

So, by this logic, we're actually doing it to men, since it isn't socially acceptable for a man to carry a handbag. Handbag beats pocket.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 08:32 PM
3

Definition of emotive thinking. I feel, therefore, it is.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 06:01 PM
7

Vasectomies also have a failure rate. The tubes can spontaneously rejoin.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 10:26 AM
4

Why?
/r/MensRights10/07/19 03:00 PM
11

What's the chair on the left supposed to do?
/r/MensRights10/07/19 02:42 PM
2

Yeah, I guess, though most idiots would probably admit to the harassment claims being false when talking in person if you steer them that direction
/r/MensRights05/07/19 11:14 AM
4

I don't quite understand. "You weren't recording me when I blackmailed you" "Uh, then why do I have a recording of you blackmailing me?"
/r/MensRights05/07/19 10:55 AM
7

Remind me to start recording audio on my phone before every major meeting. That policy alone would tear all these hoes to shreds lol
/r/MensRights05/07/19 10:13 AM
6

One of those things is done by an individual, while the other is a weaponisation of the state itself. An evil individual and an evil state are many orders of magnitude in importance away from each other.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 03:44 PM
5

I retired quite early in life Is it possible to learn this power?
/r/MensRights03/07/19 03:18 PM
1

Well you don't need to walk on eggshells or anything lol, just pointing out a common misconception about our objectives
/r/MensRights01/07/19 04:18 PM
4

It doesn't take two braincells to see that men are on average more depressed and more likely to commit suicide. Why is that? Because men are told to suck it up or man up, to not ask for help and to put away their emotions No offense, but it's a little insulting to say that our issues are so trivial that bottling up emotions is our primary complaint. If that's the best we can do, it makes us look petty to our enemies. I'd rather go the whole official, large-scale systemic discrimination and perse…
/r/MensRights01/07/19 04:11 PM
2

I hope it's not normal, the stuff in that thread is depressing and cringey lol
/r/MensRights29/06/19 08:33 PM
12

You'll never have a lonely night. Well, you won't be alone at night. You'll probably be lonely because you can't break the act without her rejecting you for not being an aloof asshole, though
/r/MensRights28/06/19 05:44 PM
4

Hugh Mungus intensifies
/r/MensRights28/06/19 12:57 PM
1

I guess that's logical that you don't have to worry so much about the miscommunication aspect of things if they're much less likely to have consented in the first place, although I'd imagine getting the crime taken seriously and counted as rape in the first place is much harder
/r/MensRights28/06/19 12:40 PM
4

The thing is, I'm guessing that 12 months is still far more lenient than if he raped a woman. So, she was stricter than normal for the crime of raping a man, is all.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 12:34 PM
4

Yeah I'm currently learning Spanish on it, and you get some funny combinations. For some reason, everyone's father is elegant.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 12:13 PM
6

Have you considered that an important aspect of this place is not only to talk specifically about men's rights, but also other topics of shared interest that would be too controversial/get you shouted down elsewhere? This attitude is a bit like telling an AA group that they can only talk about alcohol. Sure, it's the main thing, but it's also nice to just talk to someone who can relate in general
/r/MensRights24/06/19 11:09 PM
5

Brave isn't the correct word, though. There's no risk or danger to you maintaining personal hygiene etc. You could say it takes more effort than normal, and they're to be commended for being able to consistently apply said effort, but I can't see how it's "brave"
/r/MensRights24/06/19 04:01 PM
12

Basically summarises feminist lunacy at the moment. Women are oppressed, that's why society is set up to favour them at every opportunity! They don't speak in riddles so much as speak in contradictions
/r/MensRights23/06/19 11:09 PM
9

Why do teachers seem to go out of their way to excuse bullying in general? Seems like it would be just as easy for them to punish the boy as to make excuses, so it's almost like they actively want it to happen
/r/MensRights23/06/19 02:24 PM
10

I'm looking forward to the day when we're like "Remember the 2010s when we decided you can think yourself into a new gender? Ha, that was a crazy fad" It'll be like big shoulder pads in the 80s
/r/MensRights21/06/19 09:12 PM
8

You can have laws that seem to blanket ban something but then another one which makes an exception for it though, might want to be sure this is the final word in the matter http://www.elexica.com/en/legal-topics/employment-and-benefits/05-discrimination-and-harassment-in-the-netherlands Discrimination may be lawful in certain circumstances ... in the case of positive discrimination (affirmative action), which is allowed in restricted circumstances. The prohibition against discrimination does not…
/r/MensRights21/06/19 10:45 AM
-10

Or just plain sexual appetites that don't span banging the same person over and over for the rest of your life, I'd guess that's the primary cause
/r/MensRights31/05/19 06:59 PM
1

Any more details about the extortion? Not enough here to tell how fair/unfair she was being
/r/MensRights31/05/19 05:09 PM
4

So, circular logic? "Marriage entitles you to wealth because it means you contributed to their business" "example of business contribution elsewhere that isn't expected to entitle you to a share" "yeah but it's different because they're married"
/r/MensRights31/05/19 04:58 PM
-2

I bet the majority of K-9 trainers are still men, though
/r/MensRights31/05/19 04:05 PM
7

Didn't she support him when he was starting up Amazon? Doesn't every employee support their company in some way? Doesn't mean they're entitled to a share of it. This is like starting a company, hiring a receptionist, then 10 years later the receptionist wants half the company for their input.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 01:50 PM
1

In a situation where men are usually having warmer body temperatures/more affected by heat, and they are forced to wear more clothing that is thicker and therefore warmer, does it make more sense to have it a temperature where the men are comfortable enough to not be sweating all day and women are cold or wear/bring warmer clothing, or turn the temp up and have men be hot without the ability to remove any clothing and have women comfortable If you read the article, it's in favour of allowing men…
/r/MensRights30/05/19 07:32 PM
4

It says men wearing business attire may be bad, obviously doesn't say men themselves are bad
/r/MensRights30/05/19 03:27 PM
2

Uh, an environment that both men and women are forced to share should try to cater for both simultaneously as best as possible, think that should be obvious. If you set it to suit women, then men are catering for women, if you set it to suit men, then women are catering for men and the same argument you make works against you.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 02:43 PM
6

Reasonable enough article, actually. Stays away from blame/gender politics and just sticks to the pragmatic aspects of things by suggesting that it should become more acceptable for men to dress down, meaning there wouldn't be as big a difference in how warm men and women feel in the office, allowing a single temperature to better suit everyone.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 01:05 PM
1

Don't they still have the flashbacks of various groups of males being stereotypically sexist?
/r/MensRights29/05/19 07:45 AM
7

It seemed pretty suspicious when she was measured for blood alcohol content directly after the event and came out at about 0.1%, whilst claiming she blacked out. According to this chart, memory blackouts are only really expected from about 0.2% on-wards. In other words, she wasn't really all that drunk. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_alcohol_content
/r/MensRights28/05/19 04:22 PM
2

Worse than I even expected. I figured the feminism would at least be somewhat subtle, but they really ram it down your throat blatantly in this one
/r/MensRights28/05/19 11:05 AM
1

In my experience, these kinds of complaints come almost exclusively from women who are solely attracted to "bad boys". They select for external traits which imply these character flaws (arrogance, dominance, superficial charm, sexual aggression, etc), then don't understand how they keep ending up with guys like this.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 10:59 AM
19

What women are you talking to that don't know how many inches are on a ruler? lol
/r/MensRights25/05/19 10:01 PM
13

About 95% of executed in Iran are male, but we still care more about the 5% who are female for some reason
/r/MensRights24/05/19 03:39 PM
5

Bit of a vague question. What's your definition of "justified"? Do you mean if I agree with it, whether she's right factually and/or morally, or whether she should be permitted to do these things at all?
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:31 PM
3

Not everything that's unpleasant is a rights issue. People should be free to be rude to each other, for example. Regulation of advertisement is a big topic, and might warrant action taken in response to advertisements like these, but it's hardly relevant to men's rights, except as a counter point to feminists getting triggered over nothing
/r/MensRights23/05/19 12:50 PM
23

Maybe they just wanted a go
/r/MensRights23/05/19 11:51 AM
12

The director also refused to comment on his portrayal of violence against women in his films What, the guy who literally has a woman slice up dozens of men with a sword? Why are we supposed to then care even if he does portray violence to women in his films? He's got about 50 female murders remaining just to find his way to gender parity lols
/r/MensRights23/05/19 11:04 AM
8

I responded that I don't need a license and haven't heard anything since. I just cast youtube to my TV occasionally
/r/MensRights22/05/19 10:02 PM
6

I am sympathetic towards their plight, but at the same time, people seem to view it as a serious problem, give it a lot of attention, and are dedicating significant resources towards helping these women, so this clearly isn't an equality issue, it's a simple crime one.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 02:58 PM
14

Not enough contextual information for me to make a judgement on that one. We don't know the reasons behind the different mothers'/fathers' day schedules. Could just be that's what they like to do.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 02:44 PM
1

Can you not just assume that they are freely consenting if they're the ones initiating/driving the whole thing?
/r/MensRights22/05/19 10:59 AM
1

To be fair, 30 seconds is far longer than necessary, should only take 10 seconds max to stop, maybe call it 15 as a technicality
/r/MensRights22/05/19 09:05 AM
3

Can anyone translate it to at least sentient-level speech?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 04:05 PM
1

But, isn't abortion itself a fairly unpleasant process? I mean, it's either surgery or taking those pills that give you really bad cramps. Can't imagine someone wanting to keep going through that multiple times
/r/MensRights20/05/19 09:46 PM
1

Is it just me or are these so called female empowerment movies/shows just about women who act/dress as men and show everyone that what it means to be a strong woman, is to be a man?? To be fair, I think the point they're going for is that the things you ascribe to being a man aren't necessarily intrinsically tied to men. Simple example: trousers. They're no longer viewed as a gendered thing, but at one point may have been. Initially, women wearing trousers may have been women acting as men, wher…
/r/MensRights20/05/19 02:18 PM
17

The big thing most of the comments are missing is that, instead of allowing men to "abort" their responsibilities, you should have them opt in instead, which could be done before the woman ever gets pregnant. That avoids the issue of the woman not knowing if the guy will opt out or not after she's pregnant. If she gets pregnant before the guy opts in, she knows she can't depend on his support upfront, and can make a choice from there. Thing is, this sounds a lot like the original idea behind mar…
/r/MensRights20/05/19 10:34 AM
1

I was raised by a single mother and, while I can't draw a direct cause-effect link between them, I do have some issues which have been suggested could be related to that fact
/r/MensRights17/05/19 12:39 PM
6

This is an important one too, men assumed to the perpetrator in any domestic violence situation, even when he's the one who called the police: "when an abused man called the police, the police were more likely to arrest him than to arrest his abusive female partner." https://www.nationalparentsorganization.org/blog/3972-researcher-what-hap-3972 Then men pay 97% of alimony, when about 40% of households have women as the higher earner, so there's clearly discrimination there
/r/MensRights17/05/19 09:59 AM
6

By "positive discrimination" do you mean discrimination that benefits women in some way, unfairly or not? If so, the sentencing gap is an obvious one, e.g.: http://www.law.umich.edu/newsandinfo/features/Pages/starr_gender_disparities.aspx Then there's official government differences, e.g. this is what the feminist Welsh government says: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-47909700 Notice phrasing such as "ending violence against women". Women's physical safety is considered more important than m…
/r/MensRights17/05/19 09:45 AM
3

neither (IMHO) is she that attractive Lots of guys seem to be into the kind of bony/athletic look, I guess. I like them a bit softer and more feminine looking. Even regarding faces, "hollywood hot" is usually lean, long face, small eyes, pronounced jawline and cheekbones (e.g. Angelina Jolie). I'm more into rounder faces, larger eyes, etc.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 09:20 AM
6

Wouldn't the logical conclusion to this be that any given leader can only make laws concerning half the population at the time? It's lunacy. If you vote people into power, you accept they can make laws about things that concern you, regardless of their gender.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 09:18 AM
12

It's almost like behavioural traits evolved as a necessary function of something...
/r/MensRights16/05/19 07:08 PM
2

I think it's more economic vs social regulation that's the distinction here. I'm a moderate leftist, so I'm in favour of regulating sources of power like large businesses, but enabling maximum freedom at the individual level.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 09:56 AM
6

What am I missing here? Collectivist-based thinking. Think of people not as individuals to be treated the same, but as competing factions. Then imagine equality as each faction having the same overall power. Of course, I don't even agree with feminists' assessment of power and where the "equal" line is drawn, but that's their general motivation. If men are generally the majority of the very successful, then to equalise group power, artificially orchestrate female power via female-only companies.…
/r/MensRights14/05/19 03:45 PM
2

Well, presents are a thing, so long as you don't go overboard with them
/r/MensRights14/05/19 10:41 AM
4

Been with a girl for over 4 years, she's never rejected sex, though I wish she initiated it more. Guess it's first world problems compared to some issues on here lol
/r/MensRights14/05/19 10:40 AM
13

Yeah, if a girl wants to move slow/withhold sex for a while at the start of a relationship, then I'm usually fine with it if it's a rule they apply to all relationships, but if they fucked the guy before me almost instantly, they just don't respect me, and it's time to move on.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 10:38 AM
2

So... You agree with him?
/r/MensRights12/05/19 11:59 AM
1

Yeah, neither side could really defeat the other in an invasion scenario, power projection weakens an army vastly. America has the most resources for projection, but only still enough to defeat much weaker countries.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 11:54 AM
1

You're allowed to have an opinion if it's their opinion
/r/MensRights10/05/19 01:40 PM
3

Most men I know aren't "macho" by default, they're just normal. So she's basically fulfilling the incel characterization of women only going for chads/tough guys, then being turned off at the first sign of vulnerability. Good going.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 08:20 AM
1

Obviously proven innocent
/r/MensRights09/05/19 02:04 PM
3

A very effective way to make a woman lose all interest in you as a romantic partner, in my experience. Reproductive instinct is ruthless.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 12:27 PM
3

As someone who made it halfway through the article, it's probably for the best
/r/MensRights09/05/19 10:28 AM
3

"School shooter" is a bit of an odd criticism, I mean, how many school shooters have there been as a percentage of the total white male population? A tiny fraction of 1%?
/r/MensRights08/05/19 01:58 PM
8

They managed to charge that guy for teaching his dog to do a Nazi salute though, seems like there's good precedent for prosecuting jokes by now
/r/MensRights08/05/19 01:40 PM
26

We are actual egalitarians, which means treating people the same regardless of gender, so it doesn't matter
/r/MensRights08/05/19 12:06 PM
1

This would help with some legal areas where they're obliged to follow the technical letter of the law, but wouldn't help in any other area where it's more a matter of implicit discrimination
/r/MensRights08/05/19 12:00 PM
-2

I reckon it's based in the far future of the walking dead universe, hence the zombies being White Walkers
/r/MensRights08/05/19 09:45 AM
14

I was incel up to about age 22 due to this. Contrary to the standard smearing, it was because I felt like I wasn't entitled to sex, rather than the inverse. I never hit on a girl IRL once, because it felt like I'd be stepping out of bounds in some way. It wasn't even a fear of rejection, exactly, more that even the attempt would be inappropriate, that I'd be seen as something disgusting for trying at all.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 08:08 AM
1

How do you even manage to pay that much out? That's almost 20 years of salary for me, after tax
/r/MensRights03/05/19 02:19 PM
1

Now do it with some punctuation
/r/MensRights03/05/19 02:09 PM
3

We might be able to override this thinking if we deliberately try, but in terms of its source, it's instinctual, not simply a social thing. Thing is, the presence of this attitude precludes people from wanting to override it in the first place, hence why it generally isn't.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 01:40 PM
1

Technically would depend on population ratios, even if there's a difference in individual rates. If e.g. whites are 5 times as numerous but only half as likely to commit robbery, then they still commit more robbery as an overall group
/r/MensRights02/05/19 01:50 PM
11

A well-known form of mental gymnastics where there's no consistent set of standards, just different types of rationalisations to make every situation fit your preconceptions.
/r/MensRights02/05/19 12:23 PM
2

Although, given the context, she would know that he likely knew a future version of her, which should have made her react much more reasonably
/r/MensRights01/05/19 06:53 PM
4

I also like how merely constraining your statement to "some men" is supposed to make it acceptable, when a criticism of "some women" or "some black people" would immediately cause mass outrage
/r/MensRights01/05/19 10:59 AM
5

So you figured he just wears a bikini top now?
/r/MensRights30/04/19 02:59 PM
1

Is this why people don't like lefties?
/r/MensRights30/04/19 02:56 PM
1

In some ways, it just motivates them further, because the harm they do to themselves is interpreted as further examples of oppression
/r/MensRights30/04/19 02:46 PM
1

Even whilst talking to them, or only when it's a random silent stare type thing?
/r/MensRights30/04/19 02:45 PM
1

I don't think linking to articles written by idiots is really helping our case though lol On the campus of University of California, Davis, near Sacramento, of the 35,186 total students, 17,419 are women. If the chances of women at U.C. Davis being sexually assaulted really is one-in-five, there should be 3,500 sexual assaults reported just at that campus each year. The reasoning errors above should be obvious
/r/MensRights29/04/19 11:02 AM
1

Pff, I'm lucky if I get more than 3 pixels
/r/MensRights25/04/19 02:32 PM
14

The feminist in this picture isn't even taking the stance that men expressing their emotions are weak/unmasculine, it's saying that their feelings have to match their ideologies/sensitivities to be valid. Of course, "men need to express their emotions more" is itself an attempt to distract from real issues by painting men's issues as primarily behavioural/social ones with emotional consequences, as opposed to systemic discrimination/bias with real tangible effects.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 03:22 PM
1

Jupiter has metallic hydrogen
/r/MensRights24/04/19 08:58 AM
1

But if it's a man attracted to women who feels like a girl today, it's a trans lesbian, surely?
/r/MensRights23/04/19 01:39 PM
13

He was bankrupt at some point, but obviously someone with his income can just stop spending like an idiot for a few months and be rich again, so I think he's fine now
/r/MensRights23/04/19 10:34 AM
3

As someone, this is why I don't have children
/r/MensRights20/04/19 07:35 PM
16

We don't get worked up because false accusations exist, we get worked up because the mainstream stance is increasingly trending towards blindly believing every accusation, thus turning each false accusation from an individual being an asshole into an instance of mandatory state-wielded violence
/r/MensRights19/04/19 10:51 AM
1

The okcupid team introduced some pictures of guys from their office into the study that they considered normal looking, who were judged harsher than they expected too
/r/MensRights18/04/19 10:08 PM
1

If they all did that at the same time, the men would probably just adjust their concept of average to match the new distribution
/r/MensRights18/04/19 10:06 PM
20

One to complain about the "unpaid labour"
/r/MensRights17/04/19 04:22 PM
37

What's the point in talking about your future when you have no control over it? Even though he did nothing wrong, he was still jailed for a year, and not even because of a conviction, but a mere accusation. That drives home how powerless he is, and how his life can be wrenched from his grasp on the whim of others. Not sure how this helps, but I'd imagine that's his mindset.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 03:33 PM
22

How would ending violence towards women be equality? Do they think men don't experience violence or something?
/r/MensRights16/04/19 02:02 PM
6

I was just making a joke about them being called Notre Dame lol
/r/MensRights16/04/19 01:37 PM
2

There's a joke here somewhere about how it'll go down in flames
/r/MensRights16/04/19 11:50 AM
24

Weird how guys will claim they're the privileged ones even whilst acknowledging a situation in which women have the privilege. It's like either the indoctrination is too strong, or he knows it's mandatory to pay lip service
/r/MensRights15/04/19 10:25 PM
5

Objecting to sexism is sexism, apparently
/r/MensRights12/04/19 08:52 PM
1

No
/r/MensRights11/04/19 01:38 PM
1

It's not a straw man That's too bad, because now you just look literally retarded, asking that right after I stated this: Early on, it's a small cluster of undifferentiated cells
/r/MensRights11/04/19 12:44 PM
3

It's not even about some kind of contest for which gender did the most, it's just the hypocrisy of people claiming to be in favour of equality who then turn around and obsess with trying to paint a particular gender as being better than the other that tends to get on my nerves
/r/MensRights11/04/19 09:44 AM
1

I don't dignify blatant and deliberate strawmen with a real response
/r/MensRights11/04/19 09:15 AM
0

Well, the complicating factor there is that people can sometimes experience sentience within comas, and people can wake up. They may not be currently experiencing sentience, but they have the capacity for it, and reason that it may return. Also worth noting the distinction between destroying a previously established identity and person vs merely destroying the potential for one (which technically would include any instance where the potential to form a new person was not fulfilled, including e.g…
/r/MensRights11/04/19 09:11 AM
24

24k is that right? 2.4k
/r/MensRights11/04/19 08:47 AM
5

Being self aware? No, self-awareness is a much rarer cognitive trait than sentience. All mammals are sentient, for example, whilst few appear to be self-aware. Sentience is the capacity for experience, to have a sense of existence. Non-sentient life is more akin to a computer program. We probably wouldn't know where this starts for absolute sure, but we can make a decent guess based on the neurological development of the foetus.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 11:00 PM
5

I'm not a biologist, but I'd take the point where it seems probable that it has become sentient, then back off 2-3 weeks to be sure.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 10:35 PM
-2

People don't own their kids, and forcing someone to unwillingly go through pregnancy just to serve your desire for a child is barbaric. What she did broke him People are responsible for their own feelings. We judge an act not by how it made someone feel, but by how it might typically be expected to make someone feel, otherwise it would be nonsensical - you might send someone into a mad rage just by saying "hello", if they were mentally disturbed. Allowing other people's individual instances of e…
/r/MensRights10/04/19 04:55 PM
1

The good thing about these schemes is that the people who think them up never seem to be good enough at maths to scale the ratio up to e.g. $2 and $1.76, so you at least get pretty cheap stuff by most standards
/r/MensRights10/04/19 03:56 PM
9

That was a separate story where the council were annoyed about the lack of beds for women
/r/MensRights10/04/19 02:52 PM
4

Because we don't have inherent worth, only what utility we can perform, and a weak man is a less useful utility.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 01:50 PM
2

Just moved into a terraced house with a yorkie on either side, can get a bit noisy though
/r/MensRights10/04/19 10:24 AM
18

If it's a study then how did he fail it? She seems to be confusing studies and examinations
/r/MensRights09/04/19 08:12 PM
2

A repost to be sure, but a pleasant one
/r/MensRights09/04/19 04:05 PM
4

Another example of this tactic: "unpaid labour". In a (mostly) free society, the individual is completely responsible for his/her personal life, and has absolute power over who they partner with, and what work they do or do not do within that relationship. It's not bias that the system does not compensate for your own bad choices.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 03:48 PM
8

I support any instance of personal freedom where said freedom doesn't impinge directly on anyone else's. If people want to buy/sell sex, it should be their business. It's one instance where we can demonstrate what supporting equality of outcome vs opportunity looks like, though. Clearly, the sex industry will never be symmetrical, and providing there's no overt discrimination, that's OK.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 12:11 PM
9

It wasn't clear if by "it hasn't come to this" meant that this particular case was only satire, or if you meant it more in a widespread, societal sense (i.e. it's not normal/widespread yet)
/r/MensRights09/04/19 12:07 PM
15

Satire?
/r/MensRights09/04/19 11:13 AM
2

This is a fundamental difference between us and the feminists, we understand that there are many viewpoints, we give a space to those who are marginalised and to those who argue against us BuT mUh NaZiS!!!
/r/MensRights09/04/19 10:26 AM
297

whole chunk of skin missing Well, that does sound like a circumcision to me... What exactly was she expecting?
/r/MensRights07/04/19 02:38 PM
3

a lot of people have been outraged by the book without ever reading past the title. Fair enough, but it's impossible to fully consume every single piece of media. One must be able to form opinions based on educated guesses and summaries. That's why humility is important - being incorrect is admissible from a place of humility, not so much arrogance.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 04:35 PM
1

Careful now, she's allowed to murder you for that
/r/PussyPass05/04/19 04:26 PM
4

There's some talk that it might have actually been written by someone with the opposite of the apparent intention - to bring attention to the fact that society enables these sorts of abuses.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 04:14 PM
8

With regards the suggestion that the sign is the reason women aren't working there, we can easily test that. Find any other place without said sign, see how many women are working there. Result: https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/mobile/000/014/859/BS.jpg
/r/MensRights05/04/19 10:22 AM
1

Well, I guess I'm not really "active" enough to be a proper activist lol, but I see the culture wars more as a matter of gradually convincing and winning over the populace, and showing them how hypocritical feminism is, so if I'm different and acknowledge where something seems unfair towards women (rare, but occasionally seems to happen), then I'm showing how we're different, that there's a more reasonable alternative to feminism.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 08:53 AM
7

Remember when the woman secretly stored a guy's semen after oral sex, and the courts ruled she was allowed to impregnate herself and claim child support because the semen was a "gift" to her to do what she wishes? It's pretty shocking just how little our freedom matters, and how easily we can be forced to serve someone else.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 08:36 AM
8

Which MRAs are claiming to fight equally for women's rights? I think most would fight for women's rights where necessary. It's just that we have very different ideas of what constitutes something worth fighting for - we face blatant, officially mandated legal and institutional discrimination, while feminists are either blowing up over trivial stuff that we wouldn't think twice about like "manspreading", or inventing boogie-men that no one can seemingly prove but expect us to believe in anyway, e…
/r/MensRights04/04/19 08:31 AM
11

Personally, I'm egalitarian but there's no large egalitarian movement/sub that I can see, so not much choice but to be an MRA if I want actual equality
/r/MensRights04/04/19 08:23 AM
24

It's barely even satire, though. SJW types do literally claim that disagreement is a form of violence, etc.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 03:05 PM
4

Well, depends on how sane they are, and how the accusation is voiced. If they're reasonable and say that they've been having some concerns, and want to talk about it, then fair enough. If they just claim you're cheating some day, there's deeper problems going on lol
/r/MensRights03/04/19 12:21 PM
6

He can leave his beard behind
/r/MensRights02/04/19 12:29 PM
67

She's not complaining about this, either. The media are just trying to shoe-horn her into their narrative.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 11:24 AM
9

Try the safety dance
/r/MensRights02/04/19 11:22 AM
3

'I was like, I love this picture, it's a good way to criticise a male-dominated Cabinet. I was on board until it turned out to just be another sexist
/r/MensRights02/04/19 10:25 AM
8

Guess it's hard to feel resentful when you're getting in excess of a hundred grand a week anyway lol
/r/MensRights02/04/19 09:44 AM
10

It sounds like the younger son was basically making up claims/stories and she just believed him because favoritism
/r/MensRights01/04/19 03:40 PM
4

Wife's from Singapore, and is glad to have gotten out. Not sure where the hype for Singapore comes from, because it doesn't sound like a very pleasant place to live for most people.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 03:17 PM
7

If most people support this nonsense, then maybe we deserve it
/r/MensRights29/03/19 10:30 AM
21

that the gender pay gap does not exist because of gender or discrimination but lifestyle choices. The problem is that they don't care about why it exists. Their goal is equality of outcome, not equal treatment. The overall power of the group is the priority, not fairness.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 09:51 AM
14

You have to use the right terminology: Men -> ego Women -> self-esteem It's basically the same thing, but with a positive or negative spin
/r/MensRights28/03/19 09:28 PM
8

In a more general sense, we talk in this way because society is single-mindedly obsessed with any mistreatment (real or imagined) of women at all, and maintains that men are never victims and always perpetrators. Specifically pointing counter examples to show how this is BS is not intended to say that only men's issues matter. There are essentially two distinct issues at play: the issues themselves, and how society reacts to them, which is usually a case of a massive double standard. Some people…
/r/MensRights28/03/19 01:14 PM
1

I've always been more impacted by animal suffering/death than humans. In the abstract at least, not so much for people I actually know. But yeah, I'd say it must be reasonably common.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 12:34 PM
5

I think the best response to that is to point to the UK where the police have started arresting people, holding them for several hours and interrogating them before releasing them with a caution - all for the "crime" of misgendering someone on Twitter. And C-16 wasn't just a kind of slippery slope situation, was it? It explicitly wanted people punished tangibly for misgendering. She's admitting that she was wrong, that she started out with a false stereotype in mind The thing is, she initially p…
/r/MensRights28/03/19 12:27 PM
36

Eh, about 50% reasonable, 50% SJW. Progress, I guess. Not too keen on how they omitted information with regards the C-16 bill to make it sound much more benign than it was. Some major projection going on, though: his army of largely lost, angry, anxious young men grew So being angry is established as some kind of character flaw Parts of it made me deeply, deeply angry But it's OK when she's angry? Looking around me, I realised these weren't the sad, introverted, angry men I was expecting So now …
/r/MensRights28/03/19 11:54 AM
1

Well, it's basically just what marriage was, before we missed the point and turned it into the farce of today. It used to be that a woman "owned" her kids if they were born outside marriage, otherwise the father did. While I wouldn't do it exactly that way, it's the same idea of forming an agreement that makes you liable for future kids had together.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 03:44 PM
3

The best compromise is having a legal construct that men can sign to take responsibility for any kids, which could be done any time before sex or during pregnancy etc. Then, if the woman has sex knowing that the form hasn't been signed, she knows fully what to expect, and that she has no guarantee of support if she goes ahead with the child.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 03:14 PM
5

So why don't we just force any random person to raise abandoned kids, if their interests are so much more important than anyone else's rights? It's almost like we realise that individual freedom is important until it suddenly flies out the window in cases like these.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 03:12 PM
7

I hear a lot of inconsistent reports about child support. Some people say the payments are so massive they can barely support themselves afterwards. Maybe depends on location.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 03:08 PM
2

If they were the only ones impacted by their decisions, sure. But, obviously, spreading diseases around comes with a bit more responsibility.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 03:06 PM
9

People are generally held responsible for something when their choice was the last element of agency in the cause-effect chain, because at that point they had absolute control over what subsequently happened. Before birth control etc, then this was generally sex. You mess up in that department, and the outcome is more or less unavoidable at that point. Now, however, the woman has a myriad of options after sex occurs. Morning after pill, chemical abortion, surgical abortion, etc. Hence, having a …
/r/MensRights24/03/19 03:04 PM
2

Your right to bodily autonomy is superceded by others' same right, e.g. self defence. That's why conflating this scenario where the argument centers around another potential person's impact with a situation in which there is unambiguously no effect on anyone else is disingenuous.
/r/MensRights23/03/19 07:50 AM
14

People only seem to realise how shit something is when it starts to affect women
/r/MensRights23/03/19 07:47 AM
4

Well, it wouldn't be a joke about rape, it would be a joke about feminist attitudes towards rape. Not that political correctness is capable of that level of nuance, but yeah.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 01:10 PM
12

Nah, it's gotta be a joke... surely? I mean, the way it's thrown in so casually lol
/r/MensRights22/03/19 12:54 PM
3

It's funny how this could actually be either very feminist, or anti-feminist, based on whether it's meant as a joke or not. It's pretty good satire, though.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 12:32 PM
3

Ironic. They could talk about others' money, but not make it themselves
/r/MensRights22/03/19 11:58 AM
1

Take preemptive steps to protect yourself obviously, but I wouldn't otherwise worry about it too much. This sounds like a very empty accusation that is easily disproved, and it sounds like they realise it (hence not contacting police). She's probably just looking for some attention and it'll blow over soon.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 10:05 AM
5

I'm pro-choice, but even so, they're constructing a strawman. The debate around abortion centers on how it impacts the fetus, i.e. the argument is that it involves another person's body, not just the woman's. Obviously it's a bit more of a complex issue than just regulating women's bodies for the sake of it.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 07:15 PM
8

The mainstream don't understand what trolls are. They think it's any act of being mean.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 11:11 PM
2

Me too, though I just end up feeling awkward walking past people instead of scared lol, like I'm not sure where to look, or which side to pass them on.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 12:02 PM
1

Well, I'd say your feelings about passing by men at night are somewhat warranted. Not because they're necessarily more likely to assault you, but because they have a greater capability to do so. On the other hand, maybe you should be questioning why you feel unsafe at all? I don't fear being assaulted every time someone randomly walks past me. I'd imagine assault without any motive at all is quite rare.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 10:33 AM
27

It's the hypocrisy that confuses me. Muslim terrorist -> don't blame all muslims, male terrorist -> men are the problem.
/r/MensRights16/03/19 05:10 PM
1

Well the "unsuccessful" part of the title strongly implies unemployed or something to that effect
/r/MensRights15/03/19 10:01 AM
1

Isn't apologising for occupying space literally the idea behind manspreading?
/r/MensRights15/03/19 09:53 AM
2

Way to go, ignoring my point
/r/MensRights14/03/19 02:06 PM
6

You've misinterpreted the data here. It's saying that e.g. about 37% of Kuwait are obese, and about 22% of all people are obese women, and about 15% obese men. The inter-gender stats would be about 44% of women obese, and 30% of men.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 03:50 PM
1

You know what he was talking about, it was just an example. I didn't know if it was a language-dependent example, or a broader, universal principle that I should know about. I apologise for not knowing everything.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 03:01 PM
0

If you're not Einstein, you're worthless, apparently
/r/MensRights13/03/19 10:44 AM
1

Anyone can take a rough stab at providing a solution to a problem You clearly haven't met most people because they know that NULL + 5 is equal to NULL Depends what language, doesn't it? In C++, I'm able to add 5 to NULL and get 5, though it does raise a warning.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 10:32 AM
3

the most accurate way of phrasing it would be "trans women are people born with female brains in male bodies". Multiple studies have shown that trans people's brains not only resemble those of the sex they identify as, but also function as them too. For example, men and women use different parts of their brains to solve certain tasks, like spatial puzzles. Trans men used the same parts of their brain as cis men, and the same applied to trans women. Then you run into the issue of what defines a b…
/r/MensRights12/03/19 06:07 PM
11

You ever notice that when something is called misogynist etc, there's never any actual justification provided? I mean, you expect "this is misogynist because <reason showing something demonstrates hatred of women>", but it's just used as some vague, nebulous term that they throw out whenever their feelings are hurt.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 05:20 PM
2

Telling people who have just been hurt by someone else not to put themselves in danger is just a dick move It's not telling them to avoid danger, it's telling them to try to spot the danger earlier and take steps to compensate for it.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 05:11 PM
1

I think the spirit of it would be to enable you to hold whatever opinions you wanted without repercussion, but that doesn't extend to conduct, i.e. you can't necessarily express your views in any way you like, or in any place you like. If someone in the office decided to try to google my online accounts and then get me fired for digging into my personal life, then yeah, that seems like a massive violation of my right to free speech. If I'm fired for bringing things up at work that will likely of…
/r/MensRights12/03/19 05:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter