TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ManRAh Archive

View 2 posts and 549 comments by ManRAh on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Women are different is the short answer. One of these AI GF services quickly capitalized on the fact that male users were using them as sex chat. But the irony is THAT is where they’ll hook women. Women love romance/erotic novels. Men are the primary AI demographic now, but you know how stories like Twilight are intentionally written so the reader can self-insert into the female protagonist? AI will do it better and with real-time generation.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 10:09 PM
1

Man… The basic premise is flawed. This “AI GF” stuff has really only been around for MAYBE a year. Less interactive dating sim stuff has been around decades. Neither of these things are at fault for the CURRENT state of young men. Far deeper cultural issues to address. But that said… this stuff WILL fuck up millions of boys/men. Porn is already a serious problem for millions. AI stuff will be worse. You can already generate an explicit photo of your dream girl (real or imagined) at the click of …
/r/MensRights01/10/23 10:02 PM
1

Take any man who’s a 7/10 or lower. Give him a small amount of attention from an average woman. Watch his reaction.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 05:51 PM
2

men free ride women die What the what?
/r/MensRights03/01/20 06:00 PM
9

“When asked what traits society values most in boys, only 2 percent of male survey respondents said honesty and morality” Because society wants men to hide who they are. They want men to hide their masculinity. Reading this article, it seems clear that author’s problem is with non-PC activity generally associated with boys and young men oft described as “bro culture”. The author suggests that men are boxed in by narrow definitions of masculinity, but it is an increasingly feminized society that …
/r/MensRights16/12/19 05:20 PM
1

“Hey! We don’t take kindly to assuming-Orange-Man-not-actually-that-bad ‘round here!”
/r/MensRights06/08/19 05:27 AM
4

Then why is it called a “cold”?! /s
/r/MensRights22/07/19 04:18 PM
11

He pooped while they were doing it lol They baby was in so much pain it shit itself. HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
/r/MensRights22/05/19 05:00 AM
0

Damn, you beat me to it!
/r/MensRights07/05/19 06:14 PM
9

“I just want to start a conversation!” Gee where have I heard that before... 🤔
/r/MensRights28/04/19 04:20 PM
34

Man of the Year recipient... if anyone cared.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 12:33 AM
43

Dude it’s hard being a short guy in the Online Dating scene. Bumble in particular is a waste of time if you’re under 5’10”, even if you’re attractive. Tinder isn’t quite as bad, but you have to be prepared to get ghosted during the height reveal.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 03:01 AM
66

They’re over sexualizing these kids.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 05:09 AM
25

Mr. Lone Male Woo!
/r/MensRights19/10/18 09:32 PM
49

Always funny when the people screaming for "equality" simultaneously demand double-standards.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 07:19 PM
3

6 Wiswall, M., and Zafar, B. (2015). Determinants of college major choice: Identification using an information experiment. Review of Economic Studies, 82(2),791-824. https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=974110106091097096031099080092031090122078057047002065122085020091105001018031079096060017121055126111014097103125009120106015041053089019092098115030081108030091048084032084009020066009075028108065089116107126076099066088104030068126111079122112081&EXT=pdf The largest upward changes occur…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 07:00 PM
72

The idea that child support should increase to infinity based on your earnings is absurd. Child support should be capped somewhere around $1000 per month based on local cost of living (averaged between the two parties). Live in bum-fuck nowhere? $500. An ex-spouse doesn’t deserve a free ride. If they can’t take care of themselves and a child while getting $1k per month, maybe they’re not a fit parent.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 10:47 PM
6

I guess I’m not familiar with the show, but most of her responses weren’t critiques of his ideas or statements, they were misinterpretations (perhaps purposeful) posed as questions. “So you’re saying we should act like lobsters? So you’re saying women aren’t intelligent? So you’re saying women shouldn’t have the right to forgo child rearing? Etc etc.” None of her questions hinted that she was actually understanding him and offering criticism based on that understanding. The entire segment was Dr…
/r/MensRights18/01/18 08:40 PM
198

“So you’re saying we should organize ourselves like lobsters?” Is she that fucking dumb, or is it her job to pretend to be as ignorant as possible and twist every word in the interest of pandering to her audience?
/r/MensRights18/01/18 06:11 AM
1

The media loves sensation to ever anonymize ANY information about a crime (with the possible exception of minors).
/r/MensRights19/12/17 03:05 AM
147

His power turned me on. Then someone told me that power is toxic and oppressive. I’m a victim.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 06:02 AM
14

I don’t entirely agree with this. I grew up with a strong masculine role model in my father. He is by no means a perfect human, but he is a good man. I’m sure he told me on more than one occasion to “be a man”, but it was never condescending or done against my best interests. It was done to enforce work ethic, stoicism, and persistence against adversity. To me growing up, “be a man” meant “be strong”. Because the people I viewed as “men” were strong, both physically and in character. It didn’t m…
/r/MensRights14/12/17 07:21 PM
2

It's always time to talk about women's issues, thus it's never time to talk about men's. #MeToo
/r/MensRights17/10/17 07:07 PM
1

r/MaleFashionAdvice leaking?
/r/MensRights07/05/17 12:13 PM
1

Are females better at HR? Or are female HR staff just better for other female employees? The military has metrics for performance on the ground. What are the metrics for performance in HR roles?
/r/MensRights07/05/17 11:41 AM
1

Strap 50lbs to both you and the girl and then do a pull-up test.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 11:30 AM
1

Places where people gather to share common interests aren't "safe spaces" just because they don't like when people come in to tell them their interests are dumb. If you walk into a Magic the Gathering convention and start going "MtG is for nerds! Ha!" and they react by throwing you out, that doesn't mean it's a safe space for MtG nerds. "Safe space" has never been pushed to mean anything like that. It's used to describe people trying to make public spaces "politically correct" and unoffensive. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 08:17 PM
4

Terrifying? He's got a shit haircut and bad skin, but structurally, he's got an average face. If he cleaned up he could be on the better side of average. The guy further back who pipes up with "What have you done for the world!" is, IMO, even lower on the scale. The girl has a fairly average face, but she has nice hair and clear skin. Considering that she's screaming in protest at a Trump rally but can't answer the simplest questions, I'm guessing that the guy fits her "type". E.g., She wants so…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 12:38 AM
1

I don't necessarily agree with TRP on the notion that women should pop out more kids, or that it will automatically make everything "better". I don't think it will make women happier, nor men happier by proxy. I think people are happiest when they have the most freedom; the most choice, and the least burden under which to act. Extreme TRP notions about keeping women at home are arguably as bad as gender activists who hound women to throw out their femininity and essentially engage in a battle of…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 07:21 PM
1

I don't have a problem with paid leave, for mother OR father. I have a problem with people who suggest women deserve a fucking stimulus package as reparation for their time off raising children. Having kids are a choice. If you can't stomach a 12mo setback in your career, then you shouldn't have kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 05:23 PM
1

Until male and female genetics change, gender roles will naturally spring up in society. The outdated gender role that causes the problem: Women cannot have a career and take care of the children at the same time, therefore a lot of them start choosing career. This isn't outdated. Pregnancy is a big fucking deal. Giving birth is a big fucking deal. It (at least momentarily) takes you out of the labour market. If you're a smart parent and you don't have any complications, you should be breast-fee…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 05:09 PM
4

I agree with your initial sentiment, but the onus is on you to back up your claim. Not hand-wave and tell the opposition to prove the opposite. Don't be shitty.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 08:40 PM
2

Yes, short guys fuck, as evidenced by their short-fuck progeny still running around on Earth. Yes, short guys do have a harder time, as evidenced by just how flippantly some women will publicly shit on them. Overall, if you took identical twins and made one 6' and the other 5'6", the 6' would have the sexual edge (unless you fucked up his proportions). Height is an attractive feature. But being short doesn't mean being invisible. It does mean that you'll probably have to put more effort into sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 10:55 PM
1

Ah, the old "Eye for a Feminist Eye" strategy. Get's em every time! We should enslave white people too! I mean, they all totally deserve it for what some white people did in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 05:44 PM
1

From context, the author is being liberal with definitions. He's essentially using the word "rape" synonymously with "rape fantasy". You only have to walk down the romance section of a bookstore to understand that women love stories of damsels being forcefully taken by handsome, powerful men. 50 Shades is just the latest dumpster shlock repackaged for Millennials. Read the thread. None of the top comments condone literal rape. They're saying that women will want (read: desire) attractive men to …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 06:07 PM
6

I was pointing out the absurdity of your expectations. Nothing more. I've seen plenty of asinine questions from TRPers, and I've called them out for being moronic as well. The addendum to your previous post about options and choice is equally absurd. if someone you care about is involved in something that disgusts you, you can forgive them and feel sorry for them if they were forced/it was an accident. it's harder to feel quite the same way when that person actively chooses to do things that dis…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 07:34 PM
3

TRP hardly counts as public, so I don't see much of a problem with a few lads talking shit about female partner counts there. Maybe if you don't like that rhetoric, stay out of TRP, and call it out if you see it in truly public spaces. I don't agree with shaming either, but I also don't want a woman who's been run through the ringer. What's wrong with that? nor are we claiming that women love rape if the rapist is hot I don't think this happens often, if ever. So "Citation Needed", please. I thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 07:14 PM
7

I think most RPers believe rape is a thing that happens, just not in the absurd volumes pushed by Feminists (1/3, 1/4, 1/5, take your pick). I don't think they believe all women are getting gangbanged by Chad. Chad isn't one guy btw. It points to the 80/20 rules. And on that, the 80/20 rule is probably less hyperbolic than the Straw Man you're attacking.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 06:55 PM
9

You honestly believe TRP is more disgusted by casual female sex than rape? How deep does this delusion run in TBP?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 06:36 PM
6

"We hang out all the time and I take her out to dinner and shows!" "Not dating." vs. "We hang out and bang a lot." "Always dating, no matter how the man has expressed his intentions."
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 10:25 PM
5

Of course. Public perception, at least as represented by the media, seems to still be Pro-Circumcision. They fight "intactivists" by painting them as extremists. "MY DOCTOR MAULED ME!" People associate "maul" with animal attacks. Naturally, readers take this as an absurdly extreme statement, and then it's easier to dismiss the concerns. For bonus points, make a comparison to Female Circumcision, but only refer to it as GENITAL MUTILATION!!!!.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 01:32 AM
4

You want to key someone's car because you think they're RP? Did they actually do anything to you, or do you just not like their opinions? I mean, I assume this is all bullshit anyway, but... I feel I have to ask regardless.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 10:04 PM
1

Watching a guy wrangle to establish that dynamic is fairly easy to spot. Again, how is this exclusively a TRP phenomenon? Lots of couples are very "traditional", and both men and women often prefer a "Captain and Mate" dynamic. I mean, I can only assume at this point you're saying you can identify "RP traits", as opposed to more specifically IDing someone as RP. There is plenty of overlap in personality traits between people who identify as either side.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 09:59 PM
14

How is it "extremist" to advise this guy not to marry some cunt who says his frequency of sex is based on his earnings status? You "analyzed" 2 posts, both of which basically were RP advice telling him not to marry this broad. Clearly very beta behaviour, yet none of the commenters even bring this up. You'd think TRP, as a bastion of life advice for men, would be all over this facet of the post. Not all advice will always be about "UnBlue-ing". That's narrow-minded thinking. Though he obviously …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 07:50 PM
1

Never? I sneak a finger or tongue back there occasionally and see how she reacts, but I never pester.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 07:38 PM
2

They are goal oriented and selfish Because these traits don't exist outside of RP? There's always a tell with RP guys. And you always confirm said tell how?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 07:34 PM
3

Far easier to spot a Feminist than a RedPill, IMO. RedPill constantly reinforces the notion that it shouldn't be talked about in public. Feminists are prompted to spout their ideology as loudly as possible. Just mention the word "privilege" and watch them explode. Anyone who says "I can spot an RP based on X traits" is full of shit. Cockiness? Plenty of Feminist BPs are cocky as fuck. Just go on Tumblr and look at how much conviction some of those morons have. Thin-skinned? You've never heard of…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 07:29 PM
2

Cockiness existed long before PUA and TRP. I bet 99 times out of 100 if you meet a cocky guy, he has no clue what either of those groups are.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 07:20 PM
3

Bullshit yourself. If you acknowledge that TRP is about "fake it til you make it" then you must acknowledge the possibility that RPers exist who appear so natural you can't tell they are RP, based on your bullshit qualifiers associated with try-harding. Every White-Knight Beta I've ever seen is constantly try-harding.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 07:08 PM
3

Why would any man in his right mind enter primary education? Even secondary? You risk your career and reputation all for a meager salary. Male teachers have to walk on eggshells in primary/secondary education. So yeah, men make a choice not to enter. A choice not to take undue risk for little/no reward. But even if they did, I don't think you can say for certain that it'd turn around the trend of feminization. Personally, I think we need more all-boy and all-girl schools (or classrooms at least)…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 07:42 PM
1

Generation = ~20-25 years. Maybe more now but yeah. True, I lapsed into thinking more in terms of ~10 year gaps. That said, not all generational gaps are the same. I'd say Boomers and GenXers are less alike than GenXers and Millenials. Plus, being in either Generation doesn't dictate who you are. Ex: Not everyone seems to agree where GenX and Millennials intersect... I fall into either one depending on how you set the boundaries. It would be ridiculous to say I have no commonalities with one or …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 06:47 PM
2

Notice how different millennials are from the generation before them. You're talking about entire generational differences. Age can affect commonalities, but it does not dictate them. You're thinking in black-and-white. Well, this man LIKELY cares more about sheer physical attraction, not compatibility, maturity, sexual satisfaction etc. Assumptions. Not necessarily inaccurate, but assumptions none-the-less. Ageism.. lol. Are you red pill? Cause if you are that's just so fucking ironic since you…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 06:16 PM
4

What makes it such that age dictates commonalities? You're also assuming, based on that, that only shallow reasons are left. On top of that, you've yet to define what must lack in a man's life that he would date someone younger than himself. I've dated women in their 30s with no sense of financial responsibility, and women in their 20s with plenty of it. Financial responsibility is very important to me and, IMO, is a sign of maturity. You can't just make blanket statements about people based on …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 05:57 PM
2

Old men dating young women are immature and lack something in life. OP's example is 40 vs 20, so I assume that is your definition? If such a couple chooses to date, what must the man be lacking in his life? What makes him immature?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 01:19 AM
1

Any reason a rich older man might have for not marrying < 35, isn't necessarily a reason they can't.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 11:51 PM
1

As an ideology, TRP can't avoid it any more than Feminism. The question is to what degree. TRP is largely rhetoric wrapped around beliefs about Evolutionary Psychology, Gender Dimorphism, etc. I feel like it has a strong foundation, but you're right that it's important to question what get's laid on top of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 10:40 PM
2

By your definition, half the Feminist/SJW/Leftist subs are cults because they actively silence dissenting opinions (auto-ban for posting in opposed subs, delete comments that damage supporting narratives), engage in groupthink, pat each other on the back (You go girl!) when they're all in agreement, demonize their opposition, pretend they're an oppressed class despite having significant power and influence, and mute anyone who questions the moderators. I'd say TRP is only midway up the totem pol…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 10:21 PM
4

even the OP is talking specifically about negative situations. i'm doing the same. that's the subject here. OP is asking for his view to be changed re: TRP ruining marriage. He cited worst-of-the-worst examples as giving non-RP a false belief about broader MRP experiences. Then you turn around and cite those worst-of-the-worst cases for the broader CMV, saying "RP ruins marriages". You're doing exactly what OP is accusing you of. because it's abusive and/or illegal Which parts of TRP are illegal…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 11:23 PM
4

posts on MRP, obviously. pretty much every post i've seen on there about a marriage headed for divorce has gotten to that point as a result of the TRP that the husband applied to the marriage. This reads to me like you're looking for the worst of the worst. There are plenty of examples of TRP supposedly working in real marriages. I can only assume you have a negative bias and are, perhaps unintentionally, ignoring positive examples. MRP openly encourages total selfishness from the husband, and e…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 10:24 PM
3

it seems to take it from failing to doomed. instead of improving the marriage, it's a shortcut to disaster. Seems to? Based on what evidence? there are lots of things. communicate with your partner. work with each other to make sure the needs of both are being met (and explore why they aren't, if that's the case). most importantly, marry wisely and carefully. That all seems pretty agreeable. i don't doubt it turned their relationships around, or made things better for those men. that doesn't equ…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 09:37 PM
5

the changes brought about by the husband following TRP is still what ends the marriage What? So swallowing The Red Pill dooms an already failing marriage? Is this a universal constant? What is your counter recommendation? An alternate strategy? Or just keep doing what lead you to your shitty marriage in the first place? Why is it so common to hear men say they made "Red Pill" changes which turned their relationships around? they seem pretty worried about being left by a woman, but if the relatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 08:28 PM
1

"The oppressor can't be the oppressed, therefore women can't be sexist." Close window Whelp, done with that shit.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 12:16 AM
2

I was more into Gretchen, personally. Would I fuck Regina? Absolutely. I don't think most men "crush" on girls like her though, especially after getting a whiff of her personality. Even in HS I can remember guys talking about girl they wanted to fuck, but who, in the same breath, they claimed were massive cunts. That's not a crush. That's hormones. I've had crushes on girls who turned out to have major issues. The infatuation died fast, and all that was left was carnal desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 10:58 PM
1

Expect that would be like saying this girl is a hypocrite because a different girl says the male gaze is oppressive.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 07:16 PM
2

Because it's a Default Sub, and (probably as a result) a shithole. It's a place for masturbatory sob stories and soapboxing about non-issues than anything else. The mods are probably more concerned with being happy little multiculturalists than pointing out real issues... like the fact that immigrants from certain areas are disproportionately more likely to commit rape than native born Europeans.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 10:19 PM
8

I'm not a Feminist, but I'd like to point out that the story is near the top of rFeminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 10:05 PM
1

I'll be honest... I use to think I was a Nice Guy... then I realized I was only being held back by my fear of approaching women. I was afraid of my own sexuality. And you know what? Maybe that's a better definition of a Nice Guy. A guy who's been shamed into hiding his sexuality by the world around him, so he has absolutely no reason how to pursue romantic relationships. You just have to be "friends" with girls until "it just happens". People use to say shit like that to me. "It'll just happen."…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 08:41 PM
2

This thread showcases a lot of disdain and disgust other men have for "beta" and even "incel" men. A bunch of anonymous posts on a forum full of people espousing an ideology show a disdain for people not conforming to that ideology. Wow. But it is other men who seem to openly/publicly bully and deride such men. Maybe in High School. In my experience, once the social lines are drawn, men generally become more eager to take others under their wing, rather than deride them for their faults. I see i…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 08:23 PM
1

They are all amateur models, so have higher SMV than average. Uh... I'd say more than half are pretty mediocre headshots. Maybe as a group they're ahead of the general pop. bellcurve. My rankings: Women Men 2H 1E 3H 3G 1B 1C 3D 2K 2E 2F 3E 2D 2C 1A 1J 3F 1D 3A 2A 2F 1F 1K 3B 2I 1M 1J 1H 3C 2G 2B 1I 1G Now, to be really shallow... 2E needs her brows waxed, and 3E needs her bridge done. They'd both move up a spot, maybe 2. 3F needs a beard. 3A needs to lose weight (or grow a beard and embrace body…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 07:38 PM
1

My favorite examples... the 3 Chris's. Hemsworth (Thor), Evans (Cap), Pine (Kirk). 32, 34, 35 years old. Compare Evans in 'Not Another Teen Movie' (when he was 20) to how he looks today. He was in great shape back then, and was certainly handsome/pretty, but he did NOT peak in his early 20s. People cling to the early peak notion because after 20 people get real jobs, get married, and let themselves go while they fester in cubicles. But men who stay active and take care of themselves can and do l…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 08:07 PM
2

"Preventing rape" is idealistic, childish unrealistic pie-in-the-sky. In the approach Feminists take, sure. E.g., "Teach men not to rape." The truth is, teaching women how to "prevent rape" can be very successful. This means teaching women to identify risky scenarios and be more assertive, as well as teach them defensive skills. Such training not only drastically reduces completed rape attempts, but drastically reduces rape attempts. You are right though. Feminists seem more like to scare women …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 07:06 PM
1

But in a less serious setting, he approaches it as an actual issue, at the very least using it as a comparison against Feminism and how FGM is such a big deal, but no one gives a shit about MGM despite it being so prevalent. You're ignoring that he can and does approach it from a more grounded, nuanced position when he's not playing his character. Do you not realize he can have a preference for something, but still understand why maybe it's bad / morally questionable?
/r/MensRights15/12/15 07:39 PM
1

If it is just satire, are you saying the subject matter is off limits?
/r/MensRights15/12/15 01:39 AM
-1

I'm not a fan of Harvey, but like him, and one of the other male guests, I can't see myself being a stay-at-home dad. I would be happier putting in my 20% while providing a safe, financially stable household for my family. I'm sympathetic for stay-at-home dads who get shit on for their choice/situation, and it's good to bring the double-standard to light, but I don't think you'll ever get rid of those types of feelings altogether. Best thing to do is point them out, and attack them directly when…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 01:28 AM
1

"What the fuck did you do while I was gone? Are you insane? I can't be with you if you have so little self control. Goodbye." The end.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/15 09:18 PM
2

Try 2:1 hiring bias with 8x the sample size.. National randomized experiments and validation studies were conducted on 873 tenure-track faculty (439 male, 434 female) from biology, engineering, economics, and psychology at 371 universities/colleges from 50 US states and the District of Columbia. Results revealed a 2:1 preference for women by faculty of both genders across both math-intensive and non–math-intensive fields, with the single exception of male economists, who showed no gender prefere…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 12:00 AM
3

People don't just do what they want, there are massive incentive programs to push women into male dominated fields. If you find something has enough incentive for you to be there, then you want to be there. Quotas don't force people who hate STEM to do STEM. Quotas allow less qualified people who want to be there to push MORE skilled people who want to be there OUT.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 08:37 PM
1

lol brah im so agitated at your shitpost lol
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 08:32 PM
2

This is why Benedict Cumberbatch gets rated as attractive as he does. Subjective perception of wealth and power. Don't get me wrong, dude is charismatic and has a great voice, but his face is fuckin weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 08:05 PM
1

Can we fucking stop with "Does this one thing confirm RP truth?" Doesn't matter if it's a TRP post, or a TBP post, it's always shit. You can't prove shit with a one-off. You can associate it with known trends. That's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 07:43 PM
6

Non-hetero people are a small minority so the effect of their presence is not going to be anything like the effect of 50% of the population's presence. Now you're just comparing minority actions. How much productivity is lost due to tit-staring? How much would be lost due to worker segregation? I'm not about to jump on co-ed Marine squads or anything, but I'm guessing you have no way to demonstrate the "cost" of integration vs the "cost" of segregation, so my default position is to let people do…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 07:26 PM
4

Most famous doesn't equate to most attractive. For shits and giggles (and the gay), I googled "sexiest male celebrities 2015". First hit, Glamour UK. Aside from Roger from American Dad (Benedict Cumberbatch) coming in at #2, I count numerous heavily-muscled, non-"conventionally" attractive dudes, including Chris and Liam Hemsworth, Jeremy Renner, Chris Evans, Bradely Cooper, Gerard Butler, David Beckham, Channing Tatum, now-muscly Chris Pratt, MOTHERFUCKING WOLVERINE, "Sexy Werewolf from True Bl…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 07:22 PM
6

What's the downside? Are you suggesting there aren't any? No-one has to worry about sexual harrasment/accusations What about non-hetero co-workers? Should we segregate them for the same reason? Or would that hurt productivity more than the rare HR case? Should bi-sexual workers be forced into complete isolation? no-one worries they just got promoted because the boss wanted to see more of their tits Not something I've personally worried much about, or seen at my current job. Women already complai…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 07:09 PM
1

I'm hoping gender-segregated classrooms come into vogue. Boys and girls clearly act differently, mature differently, and ideally need different learning environments. Aside from that I'm not sure where gender segregation might have actual positive impact.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 06:23 PM
1

Can you tell us what's wrong with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/15 06:38 PM
1

I regretted saying Yes, now consent triggers me.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 06:22 PM
1

Something like 50/50, roughly speaking. Some people are quick to blame Nurture (upbringing) for bad behavior, but honestly sociopaths are born into the best families, and humanitarians are born into some of the worst. Nurture is unlikely to completely control who someone turns into.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 12:42 AM
20

Did she file a police report? Hard for me to take her seriously airing her dirty laundry on Twitter rather than dealing with it properly. Regardless of his innocence or guilt, it disgusts me how many people believe in "Listen & Believe" over "Innocent Until Proven Guilty". Jesus, how many high profile rape cases have to blow up and be proven false before people get off that train? They're literally making things worse for real victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 09:48 PM
3

Yup. I don't know why, but girls seem to respond to it. Had several tell me they liked how I asked. I usually do it fill-in-the-blank style like ___ -___ - ____. Keep in mind that by the time I'm asking her to fill in the blanks, I've already got some confirmation on her part for a meet. I'm at a stage where she wants me to seal the deal, and I'm usually asking for the number in the context of "Give me your number, and we'll make it happen." Considering this, and in response to CreepAcceptance, …
/r/TheRedPill01/12/15 05:55 PM
4

Probably a lot of booze-fueled cross-pill-ination. Most of the guests are oblivious to the situation, as they know goddamn well not to bring social / political issues to a party. Unsurprisingly there are no male-tear-guzzling Feminists or True Chads. The former haven't left their Tumblr Safe Spaces, and the later are at a club just off the campus of their Alma Matter trying to pick up co-eds they're old enough to have fathered. Some time after the party has really kicked up, the door opens and G…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 02:06 AM
4

Good post. One of my biggest issues was that I'd hook most of my matches with the Moderate approach, but then I'd drop into Passive / Beta / "Get to know you" mode, assuming I needed to build comfort with them to ensure a meet. Nope. My batting average exploded when I dropped that completely and went right from the hook to "This is where / when I want to meet. ###-###-####?" Most of the time the number came right away. Every now and then they'd shit test me, but with a little push-pull the numbe…
/r/TheRedPill01/12/15 12:54 AM
1

The question seems a bit hyperbolic. Most RPers seem interested in college / post-grad women, and agree that this desire extends well into middle age. Your question seems meant to set up a situation so extreme that it is inherently weighted in your favor. Personally, I would do my best to raise my daughter to be as responsible and capable of critical thought as possible. If she meets someone 15-20 years older than her, I want her to be able to make sound judgements about that person. If those ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 08:54 PM
1

in a world where men didn't exist, it would be unlikely that an army of invaders would exist, or that world war 3 would break out. I'm inclined to agree, if only because of the prevalence of Lesbian/Bi domestic violence. A world without men would be filled with such absurd levels of in-fighting that no nation could exist in a state able enough to muster such an army... even a purely defensive force.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 07:49 PM
1

I expect that I'd react with revulsion, and I'd likely be unable to put it out of my mind. Objectively, I'd have to consider the fact that this person is probably a terrible bet for a long-term romantic partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 07:29 PM
1

I was a slacktivist when I was in line with Feminists. And I'm a slacktivist now that I've swallowed the red pill. What do I do? I vote, I bullshit on social media, and I donate to people and causes that I support. I enjoy volunteering with animals (been a while), and I've volunteered to work with autistic children (been a while longer) and people with other disabilities. I've never volunteered specifically for women's rights / issues. I guess I'm always buying Girl Scout cookies... does that co…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 07:18 PM
5

Yup. She's attracted to him ("I wish I knew how to break this spell") and wants to stay with him, but she is worried about, as you said, her reputation. She even hamsters away not leaving two different times: He says "Don't hurry." She says "Maybe one more drink." He says "Your lips look delicious." She says "Maybe one more cigarette."
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/15 09:04 AM
0

When? Sexism hasn't even been a topic. Racism, Ableism, Gentrification, etc... but never Sexism. I don't think "Stunning and Brave" even brought it up. Just because the PC Bros are likely Feminists, doesn't mean they critiqued Feminists specifically.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 09:27 PM
2

Both sides of what issue? Bringing the Man-O-Sphere into the season at this point would be completely hackneyed. Women's Rights, Feminism, and Sexism, have all been absent topics this season. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see the men of South Park all "GTOW" and divide the town or found their own town ("Everyone back in the pile!"), but it just wouldn't fit in the current Season.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 09:19 PM
1

They think TRPers are liars who manipulate and abuse their partners. In other words, the more prevalent TRP is, the more likely one of them is being lied to by a Covert TRP Operative. It's truly frightening. Where's my blanky and my Safe Space?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 07:44 PM
1

Exciting hobbies are a great way to have people become interested in you. Overall, personality and frame is far more important than whether or not you can play guitar. Doesn't mean picking up those hobbies isn't good advice though, as a jumping off point.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 07:20 PM
3

Does Calculus make you wet? Or is Intelligence just attractive? Have you ever fucked an ugly person who was an Engineering savant? It doesn't mean a sapiosexual is themselves intelligent. It doesn't meant that smart people can't be dumb in other ways, since there are multiple forms of intelligence, and common sense is the rarest. Oh, so if someone displays passion and intelligence about something you can connect with them on, that attracts you to them? Wow, so unique. Much snowflake.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 07:16 PM
1

Do you really think that people getting promotions are completing checklists of "Oh, this guy likes my sports team, and listens to the same music I do." Or is it more like "This person works well, and I have a good relationships with them"? Nothing is stopping women from trying to build relationships through other means. If you're blaming your hobbies for why you haven't been promoted, you're a fucking whiner who probably lacks the merit in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 09:05 PM
1

I asked you how much of an effect shared male interests have on hiring, raises, and promotions. You dodged. You are the one saying that this is an issue of sexism. I'm denying that and asking that you prove it with data, which you can't do. If I don't have the same hobbies as my female boss, and I can't get a raise, is that sexism? Or is that me not putting in the work to get to know my boss?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/15 05:42 PM
1

This is horse shit. I'm a guy, work mostly with women, and have a boss who loves Baseball. I can't stand Baseball. Most of the women on my team love it. You think I fucking cry about it? No. I've even had women bosses who love sports. Still managed to get along with them because I know how to connect with people outside of superficial bullshit. If you've got nothing more than anecdotes and assumptions, I have no reason to believe this is some kind of issue. It doesn't even qualify as sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 11:22 PM
1

Nice flair... How much of an influence do you believe "shared male interests" has on hiring practices, raises, and promotions? By what QUANTIFIABLE MEASURE does rooting for my boss's football team improve my chances at a raise?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 06:00 PM
2

All this tells me is that, regardless of gender, you need to cultivate relationships with people above you on the corporate ladder if you want to get anywhere. This woman makes it sound like men and women have no shared interests, thus she's disenfranchised. That's BS. I have multiple friends with whom the only "Checklist Interest* we share is bullshitting over drinks. We don't root for the same teams, or follow the same sports, or anything. But we can connect through strength of personality, hu…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 12:43 AM
1

How much of an influence do you believe "shared male interests" has on hiring practices, raises, and promotions?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 12:32 AM
1

And then you fold the clothes while watching Netflix.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 10:48 PM
8

And women are being overly sensitized to the fear of rape. Men are far more likely to suffer violence in general than women, particularly in developed nations, and yet women are the ones running around in fear. Nonsense like "1 in 4" only perpetuates this erroneous sense of danger.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 12:26 AM
1

Can you point to any Feminists who have extreme views that you disagree with, and would "call out" as being bad for the movement?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/15 06:04 PM
4

pseudoscience, "~evo psych~" and philosophy I love this. I love that you, maybe unconsciously, have attempted to make EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY sound worse than pseudoscience. Do you really see it that way? You really think there is no merit to biological arguments to human behavior?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/15 05:58 PM
1

Nice fallacy fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/15 12:45 AM
1

Men individually trying to save their own lives, instead of saving women with perhaps only professional attachments, does not disprove the fact that society as a whole treats men as more disposable than women. As others have pointed out, you're conflating culture with instinct.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/15 12:08 AM
1

I know nobody who has managed to have one new sexual partner every month for three years. This is pretty unrealistic, unless you're a gay man or a girl who really likes hooking up with randos. In the real world, it's super rare. Have you not been exposed to Online Dating and Social Media? It's incredibly easy. I'm a total introvert, and I had a couple weeks where I had back-to-back dates all week with different people. For me, it was exhausting, and I doubt I'd ever do it again, but I know peopl…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 11:44 PM
1

Floor 1 - These women are attractive. Floor 2 - These women are attractive and would be good mothers. Floor 3 - These women are attractive, would be good mothers, and enjoy domestic work. Floor 4 - These women are attractive, would be good mothers, enjoy domestic work, and always greet their Husband with a Beej. The man impulsively buys a woman from the first floor on his initial trip to the Wife Store, and takes her home. He gets bored and returns to see what the inventory is like on the higher…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 11:25 PM
5

I really don't think ALL women can have sex whenever they want. Then you agree with OP, who excluded the disgustingly obese and/or ugly with his 80% figure. Also , most women don't want to have sex with some random dude. They want to have sex with someone they're attracted to. This is irrelevant. OP is talking about a capacity, not a desire. The fact is, any average woman can walk into a bar and attain sex simply by offering it to enough people, or expending a modicum of energy investing in a si…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 06:17 PM
1

Ah, right. You can brush off my evaluation of the subtext in your replies if you just assert that I'm paranoid. Good job. the whole RP system of beliefs is justified and more less consistent, so why shouldn't this? Because TRP has never said that "a man with these measurements is what an Alpha looks like." TRP is all about generalities and heuristics. Skinny? Grow a chest. Fat? Be thinner. Noodle arms? You know what to do. Small dick? Tough luck. Some people idolize Competition Arnie, or other l…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 01:03 AM
1

No shit? TRP is a place, primarily, for people who lacked success in the past, to learn how to find it in the future. Sometimes the odd Natural wanders in and provides advice. Sometimes the Betas genuinely improve themselves and share their experiences. The dark mysterious alpha male who reddits hours on end on TRP. This, however, is a completely joke. Do most of 130k red pillers actually believe that they're a secret, enlightened community of leaders? No. They're fucking there for help. TRP is …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 09:14 PM
1

I think the mods have been doing great, and have been very non-partisan, just based on what I see, mostly in CMV threads.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 08:49 PM
2

Gee, why wasn't the 50 year old cancer patient with obvious emotional issues not swimming in sluts the moment he got money and street cred? Totally disproves TRP theory! Walter White threw away his career and blamed his colleagues for his own failures and bad decisions. He was a giant beta who's biggest sin was pride. He got cocky, and as Gus told him, he was not a cautious man. The only time he ever displayed Alpha characteristics were in dealing with his product and territory. Edit: The take-a…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 08:15 PM
1

You basically admitted as much in another reply... you're just waiting for a "too specific" description of what an Alpha should look like so you can lay into a RP and their justification.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 08:03 PM
1

This argument again? When TRP talks about men peaking in their mid 30s, they are discussing a holistic view of attractiveness, not "Men are physically hottest at this time". It is always under the context of having more time to mature, learn to be more sociable and charismatic, improve your style, improve your physique, etc. I've never seen TRP say "Men as a group are objectively better looking in their 30s/40s than at any other time." Often it's "Men can be better looking in their 30s", and I a…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 07:48 PM
1

He said something objectively stupid, and some people got offended.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 07:06 PM
5

So wait... are you upset about the suspension, or are you upset about people expressing their distaste for his views? Because it kind of seems like both. No one is under any obligation to employ this guy and let him spout his nonsense on their platform. You almost sound like you're "offended" that people are complaining about this guy's opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 07:03 PM
2

Well, I think most people complain about missing out on things they want because of their job. A lot of guys I know wish they had more free time for hobbies or friends but have demanding jobs that they keep for the money and advancement. I don't see why it's different for a woman to wish for better work-life balance than for guys to wish for it. It's not going to happen, but most people complain about their jobs. Everyone complains about missing out. But women's groups are the ones demanding equ…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/15 12:16 AM
2

The point at which an "amount of career" is too much for a woman, is when it's enough that she complains about missing out on things she values due to her career, and then demands she have her cake and eat it too. E.g., "It's unfair that I miss out on career advancement while popping out kids. Paid leave isn't enough. Do something about this wage gap!"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 11:42 PM
1

Men have always valued commitment, but increasingly commitment comes with risk. If 30% of first marriages end in divorce, and 70% of divorces are instigated by women, what incentive do men have to get married, especially if it's likely to end up in massive financial burden? Refusing to toe the social line isn't a fear of commitment, it's risk mitigation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 10:46 PM
34

You clearly didn't read the comments in that thread, since the entire fucking community thought the 20%/10% shit was nonsense. "20% IS FAT AS FUCK!" "Fat hamstering in full force" "B-b-b-but you're fat beneath your clothes." "most people with bodyfat close to 20% don't stand out at all" "There is literally no reason to be above 15% bodyfat. What the fuck are you even talking about? 20% is fat as fuck, and you will have a bloated face and unaestethic body." Nice shitpost.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 06:22 PM
2

I'd do what Feminists refuse to do... I'd teach my daughters to take responsibility for themselves and their actions. I'd teach them the strength of merit. THEN I'd teach them how to maximize their success in society, whether or not I think such advise overlaps with society. Hopefully all that leads to them valuing hard work and engaging careers, and eventually a loving spouse... while teaching them to appreciate that spouse in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 12:50 AM
1

Red, Male, UnMarried. The scenario is so ridiculous I can hardly answer. So I'm in a coma... my wife comes in and either finds me a full staff, or she's horny and she gets me there somehow, then does the deed. You know what... Assuming she was faithful with me and didn't put me at risk of STDs... I wouldn't care. I'd probably even find it amusing. The way my GF talks about and treats my dick, I'd give her shit for being so thirsty for it even when I was a vegetable, because that's how good I am.…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 12:45 AM
3

To avoid becoming the Victim: Never get so loaded that you aren't in command of your own faculties. Learn to be assertive. Learn to defend yourself. Learn to identify risky / dangerous situations and people, and avoid them before anything bad happens. To avoid becoming the Perp: Never go to bed with someone too intoxicated to function. Unless the other person is tearing your clothes off, escalate deliberately so it's clear where things are going. If they say 'No' or push you away, back off. Lear…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/15 09:33 PM
1

"All the time" doesn't mean "more than". That's my point. If you're in HS, you're getting approached by majority HS guys. If you're College, College guys. Etc. As you get older, the age curve of those who approach you flattens, but the majority will be dependent on your immediate social circles.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/15 05:55 PM
1

I talked about this in my thread, and I got a few expected downvotes for my list... but I automatically exclude the overweight/obese from my scale. I also looked for pictures on Google of actors and actresses where they looked natural but also happy (so none of the dreaded "just rolled out of bed" paparazzi shots). Dormer is gorgeous in GoT, but without her hair and makeup team, she's only a 6 or 7 IMO. Nathalie Emmaneulle is WAY hotter. "Natalie Dormer is average" is less absurd than "Natalie D…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 07:25 PM
1

See edit. Ha.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 05:23 AM
1

In trying to be objective, I might have been harsh on Oberyn due to his overwhelming charisma. Similarly, I gave Jaime points because his character is a tried to balance out the fact that Jaime is a Cocky Incestuous Child-Murderer (attempted) who's only redeeming quality is in caring for his younger brother by maybe going too easy on him. It'd probably be fair to retcon them both to Above Average. Besides, no one is in Missandei's league... it was an insult to put Jaime up next to her. Tried to …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 05:02 AM
1

Haha, I knew that one would be contentious. If I was a woman (or gay), I'd want a taste of Oberyn's spear skills. He oozes charisma. But I think Jaime is objectively better looking. As I said in a different reply, Pedro has "distinctive" as opposed to objectively "attractive" features.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 04:39 AM
2

Youth: We're suppose to rate people to their age-peers. E.g., I'm rating her as average for her age. Fitness/Weight: Admittedly, I'm fudging here. Yeah, the "average" woman is overweight (nearly obese), but I wouldn't date a heavy woman no matter how blessed she was with facial symmetry and perfect skin and hair. It's weird for me to think "This woman is only above average because more than 50% of women have completely given up living a healthy lifestyle over the last 3 decades." Skin: Is it? Sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 04:28 AM
1

She's not my cup-of-tea. She's cute in GoT, but most of her headshots on Google Image Search I just don't find that attractive. Eyes and jawline maybe? I'm not sure. Shae fell into the same category. She's very attractive on TV, but without her make-up artist and hairdresser, I just don't find her that much more appealing than other women. I don't expect everyone to agree with me. Edit: If it helps to put it this way, Missandei is basically an 8. That makes Ygritte a solid 6, which is the upper …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 03:57 AM
1

Funny, because I was trying to be objective and not let my personal bias seep in too much. I love Oberyn and think he's really charismatic and attractive, but he has some facial features that I would describe more as "defining" than "attractive". Rose Leslie (Ygritte) is cute, but I wouldn't say she's above average. IMO, people are more into her for her character and her striking red-headedness. Sophie Turner is better looking, and cleans up better on top of it, but Sansa had zero attractiveness…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 03:27 AM
-1

Edit: Retcon discussion below. Weird, I would have reversed it. Something about the eyes in the first pic... otherwise I can't pin it down. Rogen, however, has no overtly striking / contrasting features... he has a very average and unassuming face. If weight weren't an issue, he might even qualify as slightly above average? I'm not good at pulling names off the top of my head, so I'll just go with the GoT cast (since OP included Dormer). I assume many people will recognize their characters. Rati…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 01:36 AM
1

And 30% of them end up back on the market... although TRP recommends you avoid them. You make fine points about how things tend to be, but my point is that TRP is all about bucking those trend. It's saying that you can be far more successful than the average 30-something schlub if you work hard. If you have the tools to date highly attractive younger women, and that's what you're attracted to, then you should.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 01:13 AM
2

We suggest that higher quality individuals spend more time in age-homogenous settings at ages when marriages most often form. They spend more years in school and are more likely to attend high-quality post-secondary schools with age-homogenous student populations. When they enter the workforce, they are often in jobs with high upward mobility, so that other individuals who share their same job description are similarly-aged. In contrast, lower quality individuals receive fewer years of education…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 12:51 AM
3

Women are the gatekeepers, but they can only open the gate to those who approach it. A 20yo woman will mostly be approached by men in a narrow age range around her own. It's unlikely she will end up with an extreme outlier, but that doesn't mean she isn't/can't be attracted to men outside a standard deviation. What do most relationships look like? Like what women want. What are the outliers, they are the less attractive people who couldn't find someone in their own age cohort. That statement is …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 11:31 PM
2

Censorship is not telling people they can't preach in your own home. Censorship is walking into the church and telling the pastor that he can't preach.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 11:02 PM
-1

Compare homelessness between men and women. All you need to know to answer that question. Whoever wrote that post about women having it "infinatly" more difficult, is detached from reality. Media and religious brainwashing? Please. He thinks women have no agency and can't think for themselves. He's literally the type of guy feminists complain about, he's just hiding it behind his white-knighting. Free drinks are the only "privilege" to womanhood? Fucking lel.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 10:39 PM
1

Dumb statement on a complex issue. I'm RP and Pro-Choice, but there are still circumstances I'm not comfortable with a woman choosing an abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 10:19 PM
2

In my opinion, peak physical appearance is 16 (for both men and women). Then you're an outlier. Why do men cluster in preference around 22 year older women in that (somewhat controversial around here) OKC study? Why not 18,19,20 or 21?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 10:14 PM
6

Fuck, I've been trying to make this point for ages on here, but every BP ignores it. 20-somethings generally associate with other 20-somethings... that's the nature of social circles. The more you have in common with people, the more likely you are to mingle. Age is just another commonality. I'm in my 30s, but my social circle is mid-to-late 20s. When I date, I'm hunting in that same range. The fact that I'm dating women 5-10 years younger than me doesn't mean I'm some crazy outlier (statistical…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 09:37 PM
1

I don't believe men peak after 40 30, and evidence of this is that young women are generally not attracted to men in their 40s 30. No shit. Women are not generally attracted to men who have let themselves go post-college... which is most men. TRP is advising men to put in the effort, and that if they do that, they'll peak higher than they could have in their 20s, because even if their hairline is starting to recede, the sum of their parts in their 30s is greater than it could have been in their …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 09:14 PM
1

You're changing the argument. You said "Why do younger women complain about older women hitting on them?" I told you why. Then you said "I've never been with an older man." The later doesn't follow. You never having been with an older men doesn't mean women don't date/fuck older men. It doesn't mean attractive older men don't exist. It doesn't mean men can't peak after their 20s. When I was doing the Tinder thing I was getting matched with girls 10 years younger than me. Some suffered MySpace An…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 08:48 PM
5

Jessica Valenti wrote about how Catcalling is like the worst thing you can do to a woman... then later wrote about how she hates that no one catcalls her anymore... and how she hates that she feels that way... and that feeling that way is the fault of the patriarchy. Don't put it past these idiots to write shit you expect to find on The Onion.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 08:25 PM
1

To answer your title question... Think about how you, or other people, view the quality of drivers on the road. They're utter shit right? Some asshole used the left-hand lane to cross intersections and bypass a line of cars on my way to work. Fucking drivers in this state... am I right? Except I've focused on a single negative extreme and ignored that there were probably 1,000 perfectly decent drivers around me on the road during my commute. Of course when you discuss older men, the knee-jerk re…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 08:19 PM
1

Reading a bit of self-improvement is okay, but if all you're doing is popping pills and sitting at home in your safe space reading, you might as well just be jerking off. Aside from your diagnoses, are you in counseling?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/15 06:46 PM
2

As long as you're actively working on it and not just hemming and hawing that you'll get straight some day.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/15 06:08 PM
1

Mid 30s. I look better than I ever did in my 20s. I have a very youthful face though. In my 20s I'd probably be described as very boyish. Bright eyes and big lashes never helped me. Most people guess I'm at least 5 years younger than I really am. I don't drink excessively, and I've never smoked a single cigarette. Sounds like you have pretty shit luck if you look significantly uglier at 22 than you did at 20. I don't even know how that happens. Bad hairline?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/15 06:00 PM
4

I would expect you to have more difficulty interacting with people IRL, at the very least.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 10:47 PM
1

Nope. A handful of whiners and professional victims are trying to turn them into exclusive clubs for like-minded individuals though. Most of them are actually Beta men pandering to some loud-mouthed, high-profile female narcissists.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 10:15 PM
3

to be associated with a hot woman is preferred for men No, it isn't. If all her friends know you're her beta orbiter (and they will), the association will mean DICK. If you're fucking an average girl, other girls, even some more attractive, will wonder what is it about you that she likes, and THAT is a positive association.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 10:11 PM
1

This appears to confirm the TRP philosophy that men like younger women and is noted the most in successful/rich men. ^ OP's post. He's saying that Jeter's case confirms the trend that men prefer younger women, and that wealth/status makes this trend more obvious/extreme. A) He's right in that Jeter's case fits a trend. B) He's wrong that the case confirms a positive correlation between wealth and age disparity for men. I've shown that the relationship is flat. C) You are claiming that gender is …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 10:03 PM
1

The men cited are outliers only in terms of their status. They are not outliers to dating / coupling trends. The women you cited are outliers BOTH IN STATUS AND DATING / COUPLING TRENDS. There is no demonstrable trend that women of any level of status are more likely to date significantly younger. Men are more likely to date much younger women, than women are likely to date much younger men. This holds true ACROSS DEMOGRAPHICS OF INCOME AND STATUS. Your examples represent only a tiny insignifica…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 08:48 PM
1

Imagine if someone came up to you and said "I have this great treatment! It'll turn you into a cisgender woman and you will be totally fine and happy with this!" Medical miracles aside, you might be reluctant to take it, and even if you couldn't you can understand why a man might not want to take it. For a lot of people, our gender is a very fundamental aspect of ourselves; being a different gender would be like being a different person. (Of course, if an individual person struggling with gender…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 07:22 PM
1

Honestly what I got from this is GLO =/= her boyfriend. GLO is your internet persona and is an exaggerated caricature of the person she is dating. At the very least, she expressed a disconnect between the two. You just described the entire goddamn internet. I would be awfully surprised to meet someone for whom there is no difference between their On and Offline personas.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 06:13 PM
1

First off, thanks for doing this AMA. I know I'm a day late, but I hope you'll still respond. You seem very open to the questions people have posed. Anyway... You feel that your breasts are incongruous to how you perceive yourself mentally, but you don't have any desire to have a penis? So you view yourself as entirely androgynous? How do you feel about having genitalia that are distinctly female? Which genders are you attracted to? Or are you asexual? Are you even attracted to "genders", or are…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 06:06 PM
1

Uh, no. It absolutely is about gender. It is a far bigger factor than wealth and status. The woman you've cited are outliers. They do not, alone, qualify your final statement. Jeter is part of a demonstrable trend. http://www.austin-institute.org/research/ask-a-data-scientist-age-differences-between-couples/ Note: In roughly 8-10% of households across ALL income brackets, the man is 10 years older than the woman. The reverse is true in < 1% across all income brackets.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:14 PM
1

get hench Put this on a T Shirt and sell it. Then give me 10% for the idea. Nothing to see here. Just registering with one of those custom t-shirt websites.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 11:40 PM
2

Chineezeemay.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 11:34 PM
7

No: Porn, fapping, caffeine. Was going to say no alcohol, but I enjoy getting shit-faced with my family over Thanksgiving. Take up: Drawing every day for at least an hour.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/15 06:28 PM
2

The OKC study? Yeah, I've seen it, and I agree with it in the context of online dating. I don't think it extrapolates out into the real world very well though. Why are there so many totally average couples if only the top 20% of men are considered dateable? I spent quite a bit of time on OKC, Tinder, and POF and my biggest take away is that women online have grossly inflated standards, beyond what you're likely to encounter on the street. Not that there aren't a few diamonds in the rough who are…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 11:11 PM
1

Fair enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 08:40 PM
1

Love dancing, but I hate packed crowds and music so loud you can't hear yourself think. I'm probably mildly ADD or some shit, but after a couple drinks I can't focus, and I start hearing every conversation around me on top of the one I'm trying to listen to / engage in. Your link definitely describes it as seductive and attractive, but I know better than to aspire to that sort of lifestyle. It's hyper romanticized and totally unrealistic. Maybe you're a multimillionaire it might be attainable, b…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 08:14 PM
3

Without seeing the study, I'd have to assume that partner selection could be somewhat predictable based on social circles of the subjects. E.g., People tend to have social circles with like-aged individuals (anecdotal observation). It seems likely that this would influence mate selection. Women with more expansive social circles would have more options and might be more likely to date outside the +1-3 range. I mostly question the "girls like guys only a couple years older than them" because my d…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 07:34 PM
6

My GF is mid 20s, right out of grad school. I'm in my mid 30s, relatively established now. does TRP promise this unrealistic reward to older guys that when they hit 30 their SMV will peak and they will have the opportunity to scoop up young girls including virgins? No. TRP doesn't promise anything. What it does is suggest that if you work hard on yourself, you will most likely peak in your 30s. What this means is that, if you've taken care of yourself and worked hard, you will still have retaine…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 07:15 PM
1

just acknowledge the disparities that will arise. Pretty sure this covers it. Regardless, people can generally be categorized as more or less good looking. We know there are traits, like facial symmetry, that are universally attractive. Obviously if you've got the hots for redheads your scale is going to shift a little.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 04:53 PM
3

Typically when SMV is used, it's based on where one falls on a bell curve relating to the population sample. Are you a 6? Then you're above average (barely) and in the top 50%. Are you an 8? Then you're in the top 10%. You use the same system for both men and women. If you were using shifted scales (where your rating is based on who you can pull) you'd end up with two different measures. A MaleSMV scale and a FemaleSMV scale, wherein women are shifted up in MSMV, and men are shifted down in FSMV…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 01:22 AM
1

I think it would be better to advise people to be physically active rather than always 'lifting'. Except that lifting has the most direct benefits suited to the goals of those coming to TRP. It's daft to say to men "don't seek female validation" because we all need it. No, it isn't... how many different ways do I have to put this? It makes men unattractive to be obsessed with female validation (it's what we call desperation). TRP tells them it's healthier to focus on other forms of validation. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 01:00 AM
1

I really don't understand the obsession with lifting You don't understand the obsession, but do you at least understand why it's good advice to lift, or at least be more physically active? Though, lifting has obvious benefits beyond cardiovascular activities. but the other aspects of what are being said are quite sound. So then we agree that advising men not to obsess over women as a form of validation is good advice, yes? This is no different than telling desperate men, "Hey, stop acting so des…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 11:49 PM
1

All I am saying is that TRP is obviously focused on having sex with women. Duh. One of the primary reasons for this is to seek validation from women. I partly agree, only because in context, many men come to TRP because they believe sex/relationships will validate them. This is despite the fact that many TRP members claim that you shouldn't seek validation from women. Absolutely, because those men that I mentioned need to understand that obsessing over sex/relationships for validation is a suref…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 10:36 PM
1

There are people all over TRP saying stuff along the lines of "you should never seek validation from a woman" then the entire forum is about picking up women to copulate with them, but that's not in order to be validated by them, although the reason people join TRP is because they've been rejected by women! So your point is that TRP says "don't seek validation from women" while simultaneously teaching men how to get women, which then comes with a side of validation? What exactly is the problem t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 09:57 PM
1

Eh... I barely even agree with your title. I don't think all men need or even desire female validation (even limiting to straight men). I think most men want sex from women, and I think being unable to acquire it is extremely emasculating. You can call that validation seeking if you want. Many TRPers will likely disagree with you on various levels. Everyone knows TRP is a relationship forum. Everyone knows the point of TRP is to help unsuccessful men build successful relationships. Everyone know…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 08:50 PM
1

Many men place too much value on female validation though, and it becomes counter productive to their sexual success. Part of TRP is to help men understand the value of sex, relationships, and female validation in a larger context than they may have in the past. Of course men desire female validation. Telling them to tone it down doesn't make them hypocrites. It is conspicuously noticeable that the overwhelming majority of threads on there are about relationships with women, and almost without e…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 07:53 PM
1

Men and women have different sexual strategies. Women have limited procreative resources (eggs x gestation time). Men have, practically speaking, unlimited procreative resources (sperm). It behooves women to secure the highest quality male (and his sperm) possible and focus her energy into that relationship. For men, the ideal situation is to spread their seed as much as possible, then focus the rest of their resources on the most successful matings. The female strategy is hypergamous. The male …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 07:19 PM
1

Please define "Enthusiastic Yes". Good luck. TL;DR: No.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 11:39 PM
3

how does red pill theory account for thinking women pursue/prefer high status men that won't commit Commitment is an unknown variable. They are pursuing those men in the hopes that they will get commitment. Sometimes they do, but high status men have a lot of options, and they are often very career focused. They are not generally eager to commit. This means that most women who roll the dice on them lose. Thus the Cock Carousel is born. The CC isn't a choice most women along for the ride make... …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 11:10 PM
1

That fucking retard with the smug look spouting "IMSOSMART", ambiguous, buzzwordy bullshit when she threw the double-standard of consent and drinking in his face... God damnit...
/r/MensRights23/10/15 09:48 PM
13

"Supporting my cause isn't enough... you have to single-handedly solve the issues I'm crying about."
/r/MensRights23/10/15 08:28 PM
1

Only if there are negative patterns with how he handles women. E.g., If he dates some girl who turns out to be crazy, I'll probably respect him if he handles things stoically and moves on. But if dating Crazies turns into a pattern and he lets them walk all over him... of course I'll judge him for it. And yes, I'd probably judge him harsher for that than for his job / earnings. A guy with an incredible job who's a complete loser might just be an Idiot Savant... nothing to aspire to.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/15 08:23 PM
1

That all seems to go without saying. I don't know of any popular beliefs in TRP suggesting women should lower their standards. TRP is about understanding nature and learning to live with it. Not about running around preaching to women about how they need to fuck greasy neckbeards in a campaign to end mass shootings.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/15 08:10 PM
1

Why would I want any woman who slutted around? I don't care how she tries to justify her behavior. I don't want it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/15 07:23 PM
2

"I met a TRPer" is usually followed by "Some asshole felt entitled to fuck me". I seriously doubt any of these stories are about legitimate TRPers, as opposed to just loser assholes the poster believes are TRPers (or match the TRP Boogeyman in their head).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/15 06:59 PM
9

One of TRP's top mantras is "Don't listen to what women say, watch what they do." All the female advice in the world is completely meaningless if those women act contrary to said advice. Tell me, why would you listen to a woman's advice over the advice of a guy who knows how to get women? Just hypothetically speaking. Completely ignore TRP. Given a guy who is successful with women and can articulate why that is, perhaps through trial and error on his part... and a woman with a long dating histor…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 11:42 PM
1

We have all met boys who seem naturally "submissive" even at a young age How do you distinguish them from boys who simply ranked low on the social ladder, and therefore were always following in the footsteps of whoever the alphas in their social circles were? They actually like it when the woman takes control of the relationship . How can these people overcome their nature ? Per my previous statement, how do we then know what part of their submissiveness is Nature vs Nurture? Do they only like a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 07:24 PM
-1

Oh god, heaven forbid someone take offense to an analogy. That's like... online violence against so-and-sos.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 06:54 PM
2

So... I'm assuming the test didn't pan out well for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 06:02 PM
0

RP - 12/15 Big word confuse me neanderthal mindbrain.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 05:53 PM
1

Change the statement to: "We were told by society we were owed a looksmatched girl that hasn't been double teamed by the college basketball team" and you might be getting closer to the truth. Poor John Cusack always getting dumped by the hot girl in the first act, then falling for some girl-next-door type that's more on his level. Stupid 80s media giving me completely acceptable expectations.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 10:35 PM
1

The comments seem to largely be discussing the relative looks of the pair , with the majority seemingly agreeing he's not overly attractive and she could do better. They're both pretty average looking, but the guy's posture and fashion sense are knocking serious points off. The woman looks like she wears the pants. If he was at least sitting forward or had a more open posture, I doubt people would be commenting much about differences in attractiveness. Bias warning: Personally, I find tats to be…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/15 10:06 PM
2

(but not too tired to make an art piece that if viewed sexually makes you a disgusting perverted misogynistic creep) FTFY, Shitlord.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 06:31 PM
5

That thread is a perfect example of why TRP exists. Zero constructive advice. Every single one of them jumps straight to "You must be creepy and reek of desperation / women are psychic and know you asked out 999 girls before them." "Hey man, you miss 100% of the chances you don't take. :)" TAKES 1000 CHANCES WHILE ATTEMPTING TO BETTER HIMSELF AND IMPROVE HIS ODDS "Dude... what are you, some kind of creep? Who does that? Here's some advice, 'Stop being a creep.'"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/15 12:39 AM
6

Wow... so much use of "[women] feel like" and "[something] seems like". No sympathy from me.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 05:25 PM
1

They don't do it just to disagree, they do it because they have this TRP Boogeyman in their head, and they have to twist the words of anyone they disagree with in order to fit it in. So if you say "these weak traits are non-masculine and negative", they hear "TRP hates women and thinks they're weak."
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/15 04:44 PM
1

Narcissism - 1.8 / 15th Machiavellianism - 1.8 / 15th Psychopathy - 0.9 / 3rd Not sure if I had expectations, but the distribution isn't too surprising. Guess I'm No-True-RedPiller.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/15 11:25 PM
1

You don't have to defend nature, but it's important to understand it... RP or otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 07:18 PM
0

I think Vlad was being sarcastic, because there is literally nothing "disturbing" about your story. You had a bad experience and you retreated into your own life / world. Empathy might be a good response to that story... not feeling disturbed...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 07:13 PM
1

Damn... OP is fucking Gangster MGTOW. I hope you can build or rekindle some good friendships at least, dude. I'm RP, in my 30s, introverted, and I enjoy solo hobbies, but I still need my friends and family occasionally. Of course, you might be perfectly happy where you are now, in which case, more power to you. I will say, I admire your lifestyle though. My grandparents live outside of town on quite a chunk of land and also rely on a wood stove. Grandpa is over 80 and chops a fuck-ton of wood ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 07:09 PM
3

Objectively, I should want to be born a woman. Less risk of homelessness and incarceration. More social and economic support. Less risk of violence against my person. Better educational prospects. And on top of all that, if I'm at least moderately attractive I can choose to have kids with someone who will support me while I stay at home and just raise our children. All at fairly meager cost. Subjectively, as CisWM brought up, I like my life and wouldn't want to be born a different person, man or…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 06:32 PM
1

The RP pretends it came up with this concept. No, it doesn't. It simply expresses the concept with greater emphasis. Look around at some of the advice BP is giving. "Just talk to people." "Just meet people through your friends." It's shit advice not worth a cent. RP takes all the stuff that has a proven track record and drills in on it. Growing up, I never once had people tell me to find new hobbies or get in better shape to attract people. The said "Just be confident!" instead of sharing wisdom…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 08:01 PM
2

How are they not? Just because non-RP people espouse said concepts, doesn't mean they aren't also "RP". It's common to hear from RPers that the advice they received growing up was "Just be yourself. You'll meet a girl who loves you for you some day." without ever being advised to improve on who they are. It might seem like no-brainer advice, but it just isn't commonly handed out to those in need of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 06:17 PM
1

suppose you're socially retarded Socialize more. Find new male friends who aren't also socially retarded. Banter and learn from them. Take a break from vidya (god knows I love it), and pick up some mature reading material (not mature like Penthouse). physically weak Lift, or find some type of physical activity as a hobby (hiking, running, biking, sports). english is not your first language (or if it is, you're terrible at it) Learn it, or look into resources for overcoming speech issues. They ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 05:23 PM
3

As all fuck. I was glad to hear the girls donated and declined the tickets, but I still think there is some merit to the notion that people are more narcissistic today than they use to be. My guess would be women moreso, but I have only anecdotes to support that guess. Either that, or we/they were always narcissistic, but being hyper-connected through the internet just makes it far more obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 05:18 PM
4

No, you're literally just saying "Wait and hope." "Are you single? Maybe you'll get lucky and your friends will introduce you to someone also single." It isn't helpful in the least. Actual advice would be something like "Find social hobbies you enjoy that are also co-ed, and expand your circle of friends. Also, here are some tips to be more attractive..."
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 05:13 PM
1

So, "Too drunk to drive, too drunk to consent"?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 12:16 AM
1

Mr. Ukulele always got the most / best female attention, but he was also an extreme minority. The surest way to female attention was being on the Football or Basketball team. It was also the easiest way to play above your own level. Lots of those guys were barely average looking, awkward, failing their classes, and/or constantly aggro... but they still had cute girls after them. Mr. Ukulele was a rare and unique blend of good genes, talent, and charisma no one else had.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/15 11:59 PM
2

This is totally anecdotal, but I'm often given the impression that gay men don't identify with the Feminist narrative either. Gay men don't necessarily face the same issues that women or trans-individuals face (or do, but to different degrees), and because they're men they're seen as more privileged. Once you're seen as privileged, your problems get pushed aside, because it's argued that your problems simply stem from greater issues faced by the less privileged.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 08:31 PM
1

If you are a SAHP or housewife, you will be shat on for forgoing a career by other women FTFY. I don't know many men who have a beef with housewives... but plenty of women won't shut up about how transgressive they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 09:52 PM
13

THEIR OWN BODIES – EVEN AS BABIES – ARE IDENTIFIED AS “DIRTY” AND IN NEED OF “CLEANING”. Kind of reminds me of something... Gosh what is it... I feel like there's something else doctors remove, routinely, because of ideas that otherwise it would be too dirty and require cleaning. Ugh... why can't I think of it?
/r/MensRights05/10/15 07:27 PM
17

"Let me check and make sure the, possibly naked, athletes are okay with me letting you in." "WHAT!? HOW DARE YOU DENY A WOMAN ACCESS TO A MALE SPACE! DISCRIMINATION! DISCRIMINAAAAATIOOOOOON!!!"
/r/MensRights05/10/15 06:37 PM
1

I think there is a big issue with your use of the word "respect". Sleeping with attractive women (and it being known that you do so) won't garner that much respect, but it will increase your sexual value. On the other hand, curing cancer will garner huge respect from your peers (especially considering you likely surround yourself with various medical professionals and scientists). The world will laud your work, but cancer research isn't a panty-dropper. I know plenty of people with reputations f…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/15 06:12 PM
5

I sympathize with some Betas, but generally I don't sympathize with women who choose to be "high-acheiving". Men don't have a choice in the matter. They are expected to go out into the world and work their asses off. If they don't, they're deadbeat losers, and the system doesn't give a shit about them. Women can choose to go into lower paying, low stress jobs requiring lower qualifications, and what they don't make relative to men they make up for by finding a man more professionally successful …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/15 05:58 PM
1

Doesn't one Feminist mantra consist of "All men are potential rapists"? Sounds like some women already do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/15 05:37 PM
6

Here's the problem... it's easy to point to certain populations to justify your opinion. Gorgeous, 30-something women aren't hard to find in certain parts of California, as an example. Great hair, tanned, fit, perfect teeth... But they're not the average. In fact, they're serious outliers who have the time and resources to invest in looking as youthful as possible (and possibly have shit easy enough that stress never has been a factor in their lives). Essentially, the more affluent your social c…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/15 11:22 PM
1

Whoa, a country halfway around the world has different cultural values than the U.S.?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 06:05 PM
3

Feminists like to lump everything under the sun into categories of Harassment. "Good morning, gorgeous." "CATCALLING PIG!" "Someone on the internet said I'm a 'liar' and that I 'suck'... ONLINE VIOLENCE!!!"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 05:13 PM
5

Will they marry and date down? lol No. Will they be happy with this? Nope. They're already unhappy, and increasingly so to boot. Welcome to the world of quotas, equity, and gender neutrality. Will the men? Moreso than women, because it doesn't have the same effect on them. Feminists/SJWs like to call it Peter Pan Syndrome. Wow, what a surprise. Women are too good for the average guy now, so instead of chasing up, he focuses on supporting himself and having a good time.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 05:08 PM
1

The average 35 year old is a lot fatter than the average 20 year old. Try comparing athletic individuals from each age range, considering that TRP heavily emphasizes fitness and lifting. No shit you're not attracted to the average, overweight, approaching-middle-age man. Also hilarious considering I dated a 19/20 year old when I was 30 (for about a year), and am now currently with someone 8 years younger than me. Guess I look pretty good for my 30s... or I'm delusional. Part of it is due to groo…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 07:17 PM
1

"Waaaah! That guy is interested in non-gender/race-related politics! HOW DARE HE HE NOT CARE AS MUCH ABOUT THE THINGS I CARE ABOUT THE MOST!!!" Pushes horn-rimmed glasses up and angrily taps away at vintage typewriter.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 05:44 PM
4

Doesn't say whether it's because men "sense" ovulation, or if it's because ovulating strippers work harder for tips due to hormone changes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 06:25 PM
3

Why don't we have both?
/r/TheRedPill24/09/15 12:00 AM
3

Or 3: They are ignorant of reality for various reasons, possibly due to not sharing the same issues you face.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/15 11:39 PM
9

Ugh. Sorry I'm having a tough time swallowing this version of the "female red pill." What version? There is nothing unusual about admitting women like it rough, and men don't mind obliging them. We don't control the flow 90% of the time my girl wants to follow my flow. She wants me in control. and our guy wants us to wince in pain. No, we don't. We want you turned on. And if pulling your hair and choking you turns you on, we'll do it. If I legitimately hurt my girl, I would go soft immediately.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/15 12:01 AM
2

Because it literally contains a laundry list of reasons not to get involved with single mothers?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 10:47 PM
4

Uh... feels good. Feels different. Feels domineering. Feels naughty. Pick one. Also... I have spoken to other women and they agree that most STRAIGHT men seem to be obsessed with their butt holes. wat? "Okay ladies... we are all concerned about the Butt Hole Problem, so we decided we'd get to the bottom of it (tee hee hee!). We did some polling, and we found out that 100% of the males obsessed with our butt holes identify as straight. I know you're all concerned that perhaps we're all dating Gay…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 10:45 PM
2

A) The post you're referencing was a rant, yes. B) The post nonetheless serves as a (rather vitriolic) warning against taking a single mother as a partner. C) Even if the post in question was nothing but unjust, vitriolic finger-pointing... it's an extreme outlier and doesn't represent the majority of posts. Viewing TRPers through such a post, is to literally view the sub through the most extreme lens possible... it's like assuming GayLubeOil represents all subscribers. Top Threads are currently…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 10:13 PM
5

If it saves you from making poor decisions that negatively impact you later... yes...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 09:58 PM
1

How is it not? I don't agree with that particular delivery, but the heuristic there is "Single mothers are risky partners." Again, you're making it personal, as if TRPers walk down the street pointing at single mothers and sneering at them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 09:56 PM
3

Is it unreasonable to judge people at all? verb 1. form an opinion or conclusion about. What's the problem with forming opinions and conclusions about how some people live their lives if the point of discussion is how to live a better life?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 09:52 PM
2

The "judgement" you're speaking of is a tool to warn others away from risky behavior. The point of TRP isn't to sit around and point fingers at people, it's to say "Hey, I know you see people doing X, but let me tell you why you probably shouldn't." Single mothers are risky partner prospects... as are divorcees, and any woman with a high partner count. You're taking heuristics and making them out like they're personal attacks on people, whereas I bet TRP in general is just fine letting people do…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 09:51 PM
1

TRP is always saying women shouldn't have powerful careers because it emasculate TRP's masculinity. Citation fucking needed. She's intelligent, educated, rich and pretty. Deal with it. Deal with what? Guys want hot girls. She ain't bad for pushing 40. Intelligent, rich, and educated means that she also isn't a bore and likely isn't into him just for his notoriety and money.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 06:56 PM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 06:43 PM
2

There's absolutely nothing to reconcile. Every single thing about his marriage can be explained by his exceptional wealth and notoriety. He is an extreme outlier. Do you really think Amal is the "Alpha" in their relationship? Just because she has a high-powered career?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 06:42 PM
1

I love when people pull shit out of their asses and call it gospel. Fixed lol
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 06:28 PM
1

Every story is about a TRP who is 6 foot or greater, muscular, and has a >100K/salary I love when BPers pull shit out of their asses and call it gospel.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 05:58 PM
2

As bad or worse than smoking, and we kicked smokers the fuck out the door. Course there's the whole second-hand business. But you could argue that "fat acceptance" has second-hand effects... essentially making people think it's "ok" the be lazy and gluttonous.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 08:44 PM
3

Women should work on not being primary instigators of partner violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 08:36 PM
1

Not a TRP rule... more a "Universal Truth"... and you're right. Men are expected to perform, women are expected to have the option not to. I mostly just disagreed with what I saw was an attempt to build an AWALT-esque "No woman is actually too tired when she says she is." I may or may not have missed some implied context.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 06:25 PM
16

I didn't take that context away from OP. It seemed to be a blanket assumption (AWALT) that any woman placed near a sufficiently attractive guy will ignore any stress or fatigue she is experiencing in order to secure that man's superior genetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 06:23 PM
1

As a Beta, I've been too pathetic for sex. Sorry. Fixed that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 06:21 PM
14

As a dude, I've been too tired for sex. I know the way I work is different than my girl, but I'm not beyond thinking that she might also be too fatigued / stressed for sex occasionally. Seems pretty fucking short-sighted to make such assumptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 05:46 PM
3

Men are far more likely than women to suffer violence in their lives. Period. The "real" threats to you are grossly exaggerated to the point that online comments "trigger" fear.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 05:45 PM
1

Dick pics and offensive language? Sounds awful.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 05:33 PM
2

Sure. But don't put them into fireteams unless you can prove those fireteams will remain just as effective. This is an issue of merit, not equality.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 05:32 PM
2

thats like the only good anime until the second half FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 10:33 PM
8

First it was 30 year olds banging/dating 20 year olds (actually a legitimate description of what TRP discusses), and now it's 50 year olds marrying 18yos. You're slinging so much hyperbole it's just a joke now.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 08:08 PM
3

I have legitimately never seen someone say this on TRP. Not that it hasn't happened, but I seriously doubt that this is in any way a pervasive belief / practice. People are constantly saying things like "don't rawdog sluts".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 07:59 PM
1

TRP constantly tells men to wrap it up and not be fucking stupid by rawdogging casual hook-ups. What more do you expect from them? Go picket on college campuses or publicly shame deadbeat dads?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 06:30 PM
2

As with most TRP jargon, the rule is conveyed in an extreme / shocking manner. I doubt most TRPers actually believe most single mothers are literally evil. Just that they've probably made poor decisions, largely at the expense of other people (their baby daddy's, and the tax payers).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 06:24 PM
12

Here is another heuristic: "Never marry a divorcee." Now translate that into TRP jargon: "Divorced women are subhuman scum." The first-marriage-divorce rate in the US is something like 40%... but the rate for 2nd+ marriages is 60%. We know for a fact that getting divorced makes you more likely to go through future divorce. Regardless of the vocabulary used, these are just tools to help you avoid people who are more likely to have made poor decisions in the past. Who cares if the baby is from som…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 06:18 PM
-1

Girls want dudes with bis. Not sure what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 09:44 PM
1

Guys want bis. Girls want bis. SUPERSET
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 08:49 PM
1

I swear I saw some dude post some before/after pics of his RP or MGTOW journey or something... He looked like a pretty solid Alpha dude... would have definitely given him an 8.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 08:49 PM
1

It's interesting that the Female scale is basically MySpace pics from bottom to top, but the Male scale jumps to celebrities for 7+. From a TRP perspective, that actually makes a lot of sense (success increases a man's attractiveness). I would have bumped Gosling up one, but the whole 8 row looked weird. Also odd seeing Cruise as a 9 when I KNOW women shit on him for being short. Female scale could easily be improved by scraping some "models" off Instagram to fill in the 8 and 9 rows.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 08:27 PM
12

"very popular" ... "I don't think it means what you think it means."
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 08:14 PM
1

Wow, you even removed the body text (or just posted it with [removed] as the body?)... Solid parody.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 08:12 PM
1

I talked about this in another thread by a black woman who, based on the the picture she linked, was very attractive. This is a combination of people only growing up around a tiny minority of black people who are predominantly poor... and with the person in question not really thinking about what they're saying. People say "You look good as an [X]" without realizing it comes off as kind of back-handed, even though it isn't meant to. They're not saying "The fact that you're [X] makes you less att…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 08:03 PM
5

Solid scale. Might skew a little if someone is on an extreme end of the scale themselves, but otherwise seems pretty accurate. Also includes a good definition of a 10.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 06:53 PM
1

6/1000 = 0.006 1/150 = 0.00666...7 He was just converting the DOJ stats into something easier to visualize. If, for example, a theater holds 150 people... it's easier to imagine 1 person in a single theater, than 6 people in 6.66~7 theaters... or 6 theaters with 1 person standing outside in the rain who tried to get a ticket at the door but the show was sold out.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 06:02 PM
3

"Snipping some skin off my son's dick was the greatest moment of my life." -Paraphrasing Sandra Bullock
/r/MensRights16/09/15 05:56 PM
4

Investigation SHOULD be handled outside of the College... by the goddamn POLICE.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 05:49 PM
12

I'm finding this a bit hard to swallow given the strength of the otaku vibes pouring out of this guy. How do I know he isn't just a complete doormat who would be taken advantage of by women of any culture? What am I suppose to take away from this...? Don't knock up women you barely know. Don't get married early. Stand up for yourself as a father. DON'T ROMANTICIZE WOMEN OR THEIR CULTURE, NO MATTER WHERE THEY COME FROM.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 08:28 PM
1

Nope. Always been a "Democrat" voter aside from pulling for McCain in 2000. That said, I use to consider myself a Progressive until I saw just how poisonous and vitriolic Progressives really are. Now I consider myself a "Social Libertarian", and on the Political Compass I fall somewhere Left and South of Centrist. Still vote Dem, but I know how to separate the bullshit RadFem rhetoric from true Liberal principles. TRP was a pretty small factor in my change in views on Progressivism, but it, alon…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/15 06:02 PM
1

A lot of "anti-Progressive" subs get labeled as anti-Liberal, but when you do polls you find people are generally Centrist and Anti-Authoritarian.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 09:44 PM
1

I don't think most people (TRP, and yourself included) understand what Liberalism really is. Here is a great video highlighting why Progressivism is not Liberalism. The former is what TRP generally disdains.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 08:23 PM
1

BPers seem to think that being on campus with 10-20,000 women is the "access level" needed to spin plates, be promiscuous, etc... Supposedly a guy out of college and over 30 can't maximize his dating potential with only things like Rec Sports, his job, volunteering, meeting people through friends, or cold approaching women in public places (bars, clubs, stores, etc). Interacting with hundreds of women a week isn't enough... you need to have more volume than you could ever feasibly interact with.…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 08:06 PM
0

This shit is so tired... Once you get older, you aren't around as many available women like you were in college My office is full of attractive interns and employees straight out of College/Grad School. Of course, it's not like being in a dorm or a Frat house. But guess what, not all college kids are in Frats, nor do they take advantage of the volume of women on campus like you seem to think they do. I only knew a couple of people that clearly were "playing the numbers"... the rest were all lock…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 08:01 PM
2

I'm not a black woman, so it must not be as obvious to me. I also think the issue is more complex than you're making it. Black women make up only about 6% of the US population. In California they're half that. And where I grew up, they're less than 1%. In my hometown I knew maybe one or two black women who I was really attracted to. They were gorgeous. Most of the black women I saw though were poor, overweight, and unattractive. By contrast, there were 5x as many Asian women, which meant 5x as m…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 06:18 PM
1

I'm talking about white / non-black women saying they are not attracted to black men. And I'm also talking about anecdotes.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 05:38 PM
1

I've had more women express an "anti-black bias" to me than men. Sooooo...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 05:30 PM
14

Nothing makes a Blooper harder than seeing some loser pour his heart out, express why and how he found a system that has helped him, and then shitting all over him. This thread is a goldmine.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/15 11:08 PM
8

An inability to throw their packs over a high wall is pretty big too. Pound for pound, men are stronger than women. Period. Even if, based on experience, women are as accurate as men, they will never close the strength / speed gap, and that alone will result in a less effective combat unit. Raise the bar on female training to match male recruits, THEN study the difference between male-only and integrated combat units. If you can prove that a woman who matches her male counterparts in the field d…
/r/MensRights11/09/15 06:18 PM
14

His son is literally less likely to go to, and graduate from, college. His daughter is more likely to be eligible for scholarships and grants. On top of that, if his daughter so chooses, she has the option of just marrying someone with a stable career and raising children. And if she gets divorced? Well, she'll get assistance pretty much no matter what. She has almost nothing to fear in terms of acquiring a stable future. His entire focus is on some abstract number that can't even be applied to …
/r/MensRights10/09/15 08:43 PM
7

"It's not about favoring one child over the other..." Plans to give daughter money regardless of her need of it or not, while denying the same to his son...
/r/MensRights09/09/15 07:38 PM
10

Hate the break up the circlejerk, but Costco is a great example of a company that pays their "serfs" decent wages and doesn't drive them to the brink of sanity. Yeah, merit and competition are good, but so too is a little altruism and empathy.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/15 06:20 PM
1

Par for the PPD course... TRP constantly advising men just be absolute incorrigible dicks to women. 60% of the time, it works every time. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 09:17 PM
5

Is it worth getting a haircut, learning to dress decently, stop smoking, and work out? The benefits of these changes (ignoring pussy) massively outweigh any security he feels in his lazy acceptance of being a fat, ugly, depressing loser. These "Black Pill" types think they can't get laid period. They believe they are sub-1s in the dating market, but the truth is that most of them just refuse to put in any work.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 07:39 PM
1

A couple people have said that women don't do these things... they're wrong. Women absolutely do them, but we call it shit-testing, because the reason behind the actions are different. When a guy engages in these tactics, it is to show women that he is not needy, therefore leaving the assumption that he has other options. When a woman engages in these tactics, it is shit-testing to see if the man is needy and therefore lacking options. When a woman negs a guy's height it is to see how reactive h…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 07:02 PM
2

Seen uglier dudes than him in relationships. Yeah, he's lost big time in facial structure genetics, but part of it is his weight. Weight can and does affect how your face looks significantly (his weight currently makes his eyes look sunken and his weak chin even weaker). If the dude quit smoking and hit the gym, he'd have better skin, lose the bags under his eyes, and might even pull in at a 5/10 with a decent haircut and some nice clothes. This is victim mentality in the flesh. The dude is so a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 06:47 PM
1

Automatically? No. But as a guideline it is a major red flag. This is the point of TRP theory... it gives you guidelines for making informed decisions. It warns you not to assume that any woman is special and will reform her old ways just for you. But lets be honest - most good looking women have been promiscuous in the past. What? Anecdotally, the average looking women I've known were far more promiscuous, whereas the extremely good looking women attached themselves long term to High SMV dudes.…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 05:47 PM
2

The "wallowing" is the part they don't realize is part of the Victim Mentality. "VM" isn't noting that you're a victim of something and then moving on. It's the fact that you describe yourself primarily through your victim status. A war vet with a missing leg and PTSD was a victim, but doesn't have a "Victim Mentality" just because he is aware that he was a victim of an IED or whatever. I constantly see this fucked up semantic wordplay on here though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 05:27 PM
2

beautyFULL barf
/r/MensRights08/09/15 05:10 PM
1

If it's about improving yourself, not guilt tripping society into changing for you or feeling bad for you, my opinion shouldn't even be brought up. My empathy or lack thereof doesn't affect any red pillers, especially since I'm off the market anyway. Your empathy, or lack thereof, likely is important in your understanding of their perspective. Since you're here on PPD, you are either empathetic and here to understand, or you lack empathy for them and are here to prove some counterpoint, or simpl…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 09:21 PM
1

I don't consider Blue States to be necessarily "Progressive" so much as "Liberal". Leftist vocabulary is pretty fucked up at the moment. "Progressives" are usually the Social Justice types... Liberals are just Political Lefts (or, classically, Social Libertarians to some degree). I'm also well aware of this fact. It proves nothing. I myself am a Social Libertarian (Registered Democrat), so if you're going for the "TRP is Conservative" slant, you're missing the ball. That all said... WTF is your …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 09:06 PM
4

This thread is hilarious... Someone posted a couple days ago about black women essentially being less desirable in the western dating market and everyone took a big steamy shit on him and called him a racist... OKCupid's data says exactly the same thing, but in a less direct way... and now race is just a preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 08:31 PM
4

I'm not saying all red pillers do this, but even on this sub I've been guilt tripped because I don't feel sorry enough for red pillers Do you empathize with men in the dating market at all? Do you agree that it's basically a Seller's (Women's) Market? I'm not saying you have to break out a violin, of course... I've been told that marrying a good looking man was wrong of me I feel like you're humblebragging and twisting words. Lots of RPers are against marriage. Many aren't. But the notion that s…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 08:06 PM
1

Testosterone drops with age (and in long stable relationships, and after children are born (I think)). Test affects behavior. Behavior is therefore likely to change over time. So just biologically speaking... Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 07:18 PM
1

Women fawn constantly over strong, fit dudes... but I rarely hear them externalize about male dominance. Usually they drop some generic statement of attraction "He's so hot" and then slather some desire for Beta traits on top. He already looks physically dominant, so they fantasize about getting the full AB package from him. This is why TRP says to watch how women act... not to listen to what they say. When you watch a guy man-handle a girl and she squeals with excitement, you can tell she's tur…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 07:12 PM
2

So if a girl has a drink... she can't consent. If a guy has an erection... it doesn't matter how much he's had to drink... he's sober enough to fuck. Glad we solved that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 07:01 PM
32

No. Professional Victims (particularly Progressives) cry about their lives and then demand other people change. "You have to accept me because I'm fat." "Women don't make as much money, pay me more." "Fighting for a raise is hard, get rid of meritocracy." Etc. TRP accepts people in a state of perceived victimhood, and then tells them they (the individual) have to change, because the world won't. When a Beta finds TRP they are taught that the world works a specific way, and it is the Beta who is …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 06:48 PM
0

The article smells like bullshit. Yeah, they cast Monica Bellucci... one of the hottest ~50yos in Hollywood... but I won't be surprised if Bond still bangs some young hottie early in the flick. This is just journalists jumping on the feminism/empowerment bandwagon that is so goddamn popular in the media right now.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/15 12:25 AM
3

The man of her dreams... just not her wet dreams.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/15 12:18 AM
1

Liberal use? Off the top of my head, I can only recall seeing GayLubeOil maybe throw the word around.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 12:07 AM
1

I'd rather break #2 in setting someone straight than downvote, but I never report posts. Some people genuinely deserve both though, because they're quite clearly trolls with nothing constructive to add to the sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 12:05 AM
1

TRP routinely uses "Hamstering" to describe male actions (even those of posters), particularly those of Beta Males.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 12:01 AM
1

These numbers are based on studies done using DNA testing. The top Google results cite DNA studies, you dense motherfucker. I didn't have time to parse scholarly articles and hold your hand like a fucking child, so I just pointed you in the right direction. LOL IM HIGHSCHOOL
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/15 04:31 PM
6

OP misunderstand what the pedestal is, what TRP is about, and even makes a shitty analogy not realizing sex isn't the only possible return on investment... Are you guys even trying with these shitposts?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 10:05 PM
1

ITT: People who don't understand generalizations; try using anecdotes to dismiss the fact that racial biases exist socially/culturally and then calling people who acknowledge the existence of those biases racist. So much fucking butthurt about someone pointing out stereotypes and making no personal attacks whatsoever. Figures.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 09:31 PM
1

Top Google results suggest the number is between 1in100, to 1in25 men raising another man's child without knowing. These numbers are based on studies done using DNA testing. More results seem to support the 1in25 number, but I don't have the time to check how many are unique sources.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 08:31 PM
1

Women tell men they want nice guys but they don't explain the context behind their stated desire. "Nice" is just an extra situational descriptor that they slap on top of their fantasy boy. They want the exciting, aggressive, masculine Alpha, and they want that guy to be sweet and caring. Betas think they can buy affection, love, and sex with "nice" behaviors, but in reality those will only get you "nice" behavior in return (at best).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 06:19 PM
1

Is Obama a Muslim? LOOK, I'M JUST ASKING A QUESTION! Ahem. Of course it's on their minds. There seems to be solid evidence that a significant number of children are unwittingly raised by men who have no idea the children do not belong to them. But to say that TRP is obsessed with cucking just sounds like you are going there looking for it. Of course you'll find evidence of that obsession if that is your goal. Doesn't make it the norm though.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 06:05 PM
2

Color and dress preference are definitely cultural, but I wouldn't count them as part of "Gender Roles". Field labor is a terrible example. As countries become more developed, women universally begin to gravitate away from physical labor and STEM, and towards nurturing and caring centric careers (therapy, teaching, nursing, etc). In less developed countries, women have to engage in labor or in more male-centric careers in order to help provide for their families. When given more freedom and fina…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 05:08 PM
1

Just from personal experience, I would say that age has not shrunk my dating pool... it has increased it. Now in my 30s I've been out with women as young as 19 and as old as 40, though they tend to average mid-20s (my preference overall). The main difference between myself now and when I was in my 20s is that, especially in college, I had more ACCESS to a lot of women. Post-College seeking out women becomes more of a chore. But I undoubtedly have more to offer (high value) now than 10 years ago.…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 09:29 PM
2

There's a lot of conflating of issues in this thread, as well as misunderstanding regarding the point of catcalling. First of all. Women like catcalling in general because it is external validation. Case in point, noted Feminist Jessica Valenti writes that she misses being catcalled now that she is starting to show her age (of course, she blames society for feeling that way). Yeah, it's one example, but I have countless more from all my female friends. I've had some tell me directly that if a we…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 09:16 PM
1

They both loved it[...] There was no polarization... She scoffed at the notion that she should be offended. She was not offended. Neither of them were. Edit: She didn't even describe the guy. He may or may not have been hot. She may not have even gotten a good look at him. She still took it as a compliment and not something to get all pissy about.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 08:19 PM
1

Story from a co-worker this week: She went to the gym with her friend, and some guy yelled "Nice ass!" from his car in the parking lot. They both loved it, and she scoffed when I said "Wait... you weren't offended!?" with feigned shock. The only reason you think women universally hate catcalling is because a few shrill harpies are crying about it on the internet. Women selectively hate cat-calling.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 07:29 PM
3

Would love to see a rebuttal like this actually go viral online. As to your situation, I feel for you. Personally, I would recommend you see a therapist to talk about how you feel... a healthy outlet. You seem to have validation issues.. Validation should come from within. Lifting is a great outlet, but you still need more. You need more things that make you feel good just for being you and engaging in those things. You seem like a smart and athletic guy... there are a wealth of hobbies out ther…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 06:39 PM
1

Don't want to see Men following in the footsteps of FA and HAES type movements. Nothing wrong with beauty standards or marketing using those standards to sell products. Let the women have it. Let it fail. And let society move past it. Hyper-masculine He-Man action figures didn't give me body dysmorphia.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 06:24 PM
3

Yeah, this isn't going to have the impact that the activists want. It might help workers fight cases of wage discrimination, but it isn't going to just suddenly raise female pay across the state of CA. It will have the wonderful impact of proving how misguided these activists are though when the "gap" still exists 10 years down the line.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:09 PM
7

The 5'4" and under girls actually seem more prone to this. Taller girls just say "I hope you're taller than me." Midget chicks drop the "If your height starts with a 5..." shit... especially the "Fat & Sassy" types.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/15 06:56 PM
26

This. Don't be weak in your weakness. Don't whine about being sick. Don't parade it around. Even if you're going "I'M A FUCKIN MAN NO SICKNESS CAN KEEP ME DOWN", you look weak by constantly harping on it. Men accept their reality and deal with it with stoicism.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/15 11:49 PM
2

Same thread, new title, a week later. This guy is hung up on his past (Frat life), and seems like he's looking for a PUA-style Magic Pill to return to his glory days. If I remember right, you got plenty of good advice, Guy. There's no way you'll find the level of access you had in a Frat post-college, but you can take steps to get close. Go out and do shit with high volumes of women. Dancing, clubs, bars, online, events, etc, etc. Tinder is full of narcissistic women with inflated egos, but it's…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 06:08 PM
1

Nice use of hyperbole, you sure added to the discussion. I reject the notion that true equality can exist because of inherent biological bias. I do not reject the notion that we can approach equality and improve the situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 03:02 PM
2

There absolutely are biological reasons behind our behavior, and to ignore them is to ignore that there will always be inherent bias regardless of how much we try to control for it through awareness.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 09:47 PM
1

According to Wikipedia, E. Euro men average 5'11"... American men average 5'10"... but I've seen other numbers showing American men average 5'11" now also... so....
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 09:44 PM
1

Yeah, and then some of those girls do it anyway behind their friend's back.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 09:38 PM
3

Average heights are increasing... Thinking it isn't a problem with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 09:33 PM
1

What are your limiting factors?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 06:10 PM
2

You believe personal growth for yourself is an impossibility?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 04:06 PM
1

Oh, it gets worse. There's that article in another thread where a woman advises other women to find men more in love with her than she is with him. Talk about ignoring your nature and setting yourself up for failure. The absolute quickest way to a dead bedroom, affair, and a divorce (or cuckolded).
/r/TheRedPill24/08/15 10:18 PM
1

It's more culture/sub-culture than race, and your descriptions are massively hyperbolic, though I agree in spirit. My best dating experiences were with FOBs (Asian), without a doubt. Maybe I go for / attract a certain type, but they were all more open and honest, and didn't play games as much. They also care a lot about staying thin. White and hispanic girls I dated all put on weight at some point, and complained about it more than trying to fix it. One even told me it was a good thing because s…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 08:32 PM
1

No, because so long as a man improves his life, even with a goal of sleeping with more women, he has improved and will be happier for it, even if his desired outcome is never fully realized. He may even grow to realize that such an outcome is not as important as he once thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 07:56 PM
2

What's the point in arguing with people who can't understand generalities and trends?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 07:54 PM
27

I believe most of us have shifted our dating problems on the opposite sex at some point in our lives. TRP doesn't shift the problem onto women, it recognizes certain realities about women and advises men on how to behave and improve themselves in order to deal with said reality. It explicitly is telling men that they need to change and improve. Shifting the problems onto women would be saying that women have to change their hypergamous nature, rather than teaching men to adapt to it. Now TRP wil…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 07:40 PM
5

"Why obsessed with muscles?" Posts guy with visible abs and calls it average. He's obviously not "buff", but come on. He's more fit than "average" by a long shot. Just walking around in a fitted T would at least prove he's got definition. How full of shit would you say you are? 50% of Germans are everweight, and 20% are obese, leaving 30% "normal" or underweight. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obesity_in_Germany You're also confusing outcomes with desired outcomes. Top tier dudes with muscular, m…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 07:22 PM
1

I've never heard anyone argue that "trophy wives" are the norm. They are outliers (because the men with enough status are outliers themselves), and the article seems to agree with that. Why you think that necessitates the jump to "Not at all" is beyond me. Oh wait... Narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 07:03 PM
0

Define "skinny men". I was out and about over the weekend and most of the best looking women I saw with men were with athletic looking guys. Soooo... anecdote vs anecdote. Literally can't trust people when they say things like "fat", "average", or "skinny", because averages have been completely fucked over by fatties.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 06:56 PM
3

Most people can always improve their physique, finances, lifestyle, etc in some way. There is ALWAYS room for growth. Why are you arguing from the most extreme point possible?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 05:44 PM
7

"Muh anecdote breaks TRP; I know a nerdy midget who literally everyone wants to bang." -BP threads in a nutshell.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 05:30 PM
2

College campuses are majority female. Of course things aren't as "Easy Mode" as being a Frat Bro at the height of his college career. Your problem is volume. You will have to put effort now into keeping your volume of interaction with women up, but you have more to offer now than you did previously (unless you're only interested in girls who want to get drunk at frat parties).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/15 07:07 PM
1

Yes, but my assumption is that it isn't common. Too many stories about couples who try to do it, and it turns out that the girl just wants it open on her side, and as soon as a guy in such a relationship turns out to be popular in swinger circles, or simply just has the game to have side chicks in the open relationship, the girl freaks out, gets jealous, and changes her mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/15 06:55 PM
3

What? Nowhere did I see anyone explicitly agree with your statement that there is confusion between the Civilized vs Barbaric Alpha interpretation. Sociopaths can have attributes of Alphas, Beta, or Omegas all. No one discusses "Alphas" and assumes it means "Sociopath". Archwinger only said that Rapists have attributes which can be described as Alpha, not that the Alpha description explicitly describes Rapists or other sociopaths.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/15 06:51 PM
1

Unicorn @ 21 I've been a "Serial Monogamist" ever since I started dating. Almost every relationship 1-2yr long. I don't personally find having lots of flings very fulfilling, even though I consistently desire sex with multiple women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/15 06:46 PM
2

Response? You mean acknowledging that context matters with words? You've concocted the lexicon issue. Only the most lunatic fringe opinions consider "Alpha" to represent Barbaric Alpha in conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/15 06:40 PM
2

TRP laughs at groups like Women Against Feminism Except you started by describing the Sub/Culture as looking down on Women Against Feminism. Then you followed up with an "example", as if it justified the original statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/15 06:22 PM
4

Well, let's just say that whenever you have a female MRA, you'll also have a redpiller who says that she's just trying to impress men. This is like saying GayLubeOil is representative of the majority of RPers.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/15 05:15 PM
9

And yet it happens enough that it basically balances out the other Myth that women are raped far more often than men.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 11:01 PM
3

Yes it would still exist, but there would be less disparity in quality between men, so likely a more even distribution of female attention across the bell curve (less stacked at the end like it currently is likely to be).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/15 08:13 PM
1

i back off at first but it keeps going on and it's irking me because he's getting more aggressive towards a female and that's not right Critical levels of White-Knighting! Almost makes me think the story is fake. I mean... he describes a woman kicking and punching her BF, and the BF responds by pushing her back... so Mr. WhiteKnight SUCKER PUNCHES the guy and actually knocks him out. At the very least it's nice to see people calling him out it, real or not.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 04:39 PM
1

Mammoth oneitis. I would say run, but I feel like you need to actually crash and burn to learn a lesson. She's free, and all her friends are calling her on her bullshit. MAKE A MOVE. Either a) she'll drop some Friendzone shit on you, or b) you'll end up with your tongue in her mouth. If a) you learned a valuable lesson and you can move on from it. If b) you'll learn a valuable lesson shortly down the road when she cheats on you with her Ex.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/15 11:05 PM
4

Any Pill that doesn't contain Feminismtm
/r/TheRedPill19/08/15 10:29 PM
3

Put your foot down and stop letting your wife walk over you. She is actively undermining you and teaching your children that you are not to be respected and that she is somehow a "victim" in your household. That has to stop, NOW. Stop giving her money. If she's not going to work, set an allowance for the things she needs to buy for the kids. Don't let her blow through the money YOU earned for YOUR FAMILY. STOP REWARDING HER SHITTY BEHAVIOR.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 04:54 PM
1

The only thing I imagine changing will be some women with low sex drive taking this, and other women with low sex drive running to r/Relationships to complain that their partner asked them to take this to fix their Dead Bedroom.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 07:59 PM
4

It's an example to highlight the point, which you are clearly missing. IF intelligence, humor, and talent were sexually attractive, then a supremely funny fat girl could compete with a beautiful girl with a Basic Bitch personality. But those "attractive" traits aren't sexually attractive. I don't give a fuck about your Emmy, Nobel Prize, and Stand-up Routine if you've got a Grade 5 FUPA. How is it even possible not to understand the difference between primal sexual attraction and general attract…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 06:33 PM
4

I'll ignore any in your list I don't think really count as "bringing something to the table". Sex: There is a difference between wanton bacheloric sexual escapades, and sex with someone you have an emotional attachement with. Maybe not for you, but even being RP myself I'll happily admit that. You're either delusional, or a sociopath if you disagree, IMO. Kids: Children raised by a couple are better off than children raised by single-parents. This reason relies on you wanting children, of course…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 06:11 PM
1

Status. Why do women see a ring on a guy's finger and suddenly have more interest in banging him? Stereotypes exist for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 06:05 PM
3

Female presence? He's just saying that a 2-person parental unit is better for children than a single-parent / split unit. It could be two dudes or two chicks, and it'd still be better than a single-parent situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 06:03 PM
1

"Don't tell women what to wear! Stop objectifying!" "Men shouldn't wear this because it's ugly!" Not even disagreeing that cargo shorts aren't flattering... just so sick of these bullshit double-standards... and it's totally unsurprising that it's coming from Buzzfeed.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 05:41 PM
2

I hear "Fuckboy" used far more to describe just... guys who women fuck. It's just a slightly derogatory way of saying Fuck Buddy that is gender specific. Wait... OOOOOOH... of course it's that Self-Hating, White-Knighting Moron who wrote that he feels guilty about enjoying grilling.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 05:34 PM
2

Lists excuses why you should split the bill. "There's no excuse!"
/r/MensRights17/08/15 09:54 PM
2

You know those threads where people complain that PPD is actually becoming Red-Leaning/Sympathetic? It's because of shite Blooper threads like these. "RedPill Truths don't real because of this one anecdote I'm citing. Also, no one is actually attracted to James Bond Lad-type personalities. Also, I'm going to go against the grain and claim I've never seen some Alpha Jock Asshole get laid."
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/15 08:18 PM
13

The top comment is literally, "The University Gender Gap is due to MALE LIFE CHOICES... more men choose trades! Of course fewer men as a percentage go to University!" -_-;
/r/MensRights17/08/15 04:57 PM
8

Does The Donald try to actively subjugate women? No? He's probably just an uncouth bellend.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 07:22 PM
10

Whoa whoa whoa... are you suggesting that acknowledging negative factors doesn't preclude positive outcomes?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 07:17 PM
1

Or you could save that praise for a woman without a distinct goal of exploiting men for her benefit. There is a difference between wanting security and a provider, and being willing to exploit people for those things.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 03:47 PM
15

Mind-blowing that she can be rendered so utterly speechless by the truth, and yet still fail to internalize it.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 03:36 PM
18

People do really dumb shit when they're emotional.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 11:44 PM
8

That dude got waxed and probably did an equivalent amount of "prep" to get clean and shiny... but he also worked his ass off in ways the female model can't imagine. I don't see how you can possibly equate the two.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 11:30 PM
7

Classic retort, m'bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 11:03 PM
4

Planning or no planning isn't the point. The point is how you appear as a leader. Some girls might want a guy who seems more wild and spontaneous, some might want a guy who seems more driven and focused on specific goals. Both girls still only care about the fact that the guy is taking the lead and bringing her along for a good ride. I'm not saying your way doesn't work, I'm just disagreeing with your blanket statement about people who "have a plan". I don't think it's constructive advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 10:59 PM
15

To look good as a woman you have to have a pretty face (genetics), not over-eat, and not sit on your ass. It's pretty simple really, unless you're dating guys who only go for very athletic / fit girls. The girl in your example doesn't look particularly fit at all... she's just thin, has nice tits, and a great face. I guarantee you that little effort goes into how she looks outside of make-up and portion control. Edit: I'm obviously excluding things like "Take a goddamn shower, floss your teeth, …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 10:46 PM
4

Haha, this is so ridiculous. Like I said, spontaneity is good, but having some kind of plan shows you're a leader and know what you want. I've literally had women tell me "I really like that you just told me what we were doing and we went." I'm NOT saying that you plan out every single detail, but a framework has always been appreciated by my dates. I'm also definitely not saying that you hand her a goddamn itinerary. You can plan something and still create the illusion of spontaneity.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 10:44 PM
4

Planning is boring? Women love it when you just plan shit and say "This is what we're doing, let's go." OBVIOUSLY being able to adapt is important.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 10:01 PM
13

True, obviously this is what everyone wants. Natural, flowing interaction on both sides. The absurdity is in the gender-flip. "I shouldn't have to do anything to feel a connection with a woman" is a ridiculous statement no one would take seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 09:26 PM
16

"A guy has to be interesting without trying." vs "A woman has to be pretty without trying." Except that being interesting is a skill that needs honing. Being born pretty is just... a free pass. Plus, I doubt many guys would describe a "perfect date" as "I want to do nothing. She should be hot enough to keep my attention without having to be lame and use makeup or blow me right away to distract me." No one would ever accept such an answer from a guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 07:40 PM
1

Tinder girls generally are best avoided. Tinder is the dating app for narcissistic women, and the Chad Thundercocks with the natural talent to actually catch their interest. If you aren't a Chad, you're going to have to come out swinging with some serious game if you want to get to a meetup. Just being relatively handsome and funny won't be enough even for 6s and 7s. There are so many thirsty Betas on Tinder that these women have the pick of the litter. Just by being on Tinder as a man, you have…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 04:26 PM
1

Ooooh, a comment chain suggesting that Based Mom "upholds misogyny". Yup. That sub officially was created just to be a HugBox under the guise of "Feminists care about Men's issues".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 03:36 PM
7

"You're not a woman, you couldn't understand... I'm a woman, let me tell you what it's like to be a man."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 03:32 PM
8

Holy shit... I'm reading through the thread that AgainstMR claims "got out of control"... it literally ran off the rails because a FEMINIST got all pissy that someone disagreed with her... then she just rants about shit, and her advice to the guy is "Don't woo women, approach them as equals and go Dutch on dates... because it's 2015 or some shit." My fucking brain... ugh... Edit: More fun... "Rejecting Feminism is misogynistic," in a thread about Egalitarianism. They're so fucking delusional. It…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 03:22 PM
5

I have a couple pretty staunch Feminist friends, who I wouldn't call radical, but still have absurd views on Men's Rights. They essentially see MRAs as almost universally misogynist, and they believe that the best way to solve Men's Rights issues is to solve Feminist issues. Yeah... you read that right. Solving Women's Rights issues solves Men's Rights by proxy. It's the dumbest shit ever. If we would just hire more women in Stem and make them CEOs, men would stop committing suicide and would be…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 03:17 PM
2

I don't know many guys who demand a girl match certain measurements (except Sir Mix-A-Lot), but there are plenty of women out there who say "If you're not at least 6ft... Pass." Even some short chicks. I think most guys just want a girl who's fit / not fat and has a pretty face. Pretty easy to meet standards. Even handsome dudes can miss the mark just being too short or too skinny. That said, I totally understand why women want taller guys and try not to criticize the preference. It makes total …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 09:27 PM
1

You need better pictures, but you also need good openers. Just acting like you have options and holding frame isn't going to get you shit if you're boring. You'd have to be a physical Chad Adonis Thundercock to even think about pulling game off with no wit.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/15 09:51 PM
1

Keep it tight unless you're a big dude. Seen tons of skinny dudes rocking sporting with big beards and it just makes their heads look massively disproportionate and weird.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/15 09:04 PM
6

What? No. First of all, TRP already pushes Fitness and Status as Alpha traits that men should strive for. Alpha "Character Traits" are simply one piece of the puzzle. Secondly, if the majority of men become Alpha in character, then fitness (also an Alpha trait) will be more sought after. If the majority of men have both character and fitness, then success and status will become the defining feature that women use for selection. But all of these traits will remain desirable. The theory doesn't ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/15 05:04 PM
2

AWALT is a means to deal with generalities. It is a confirmation that women have specific biological imperatives that differ from men, and that you cannot assume that any one woman is inherently "special". It is unproductive and needlessly time-consuming to say "Well, I dated 20 different women, and all but one acted/reacted the same in these scenarios... so you have a 5% chance that your crush is a Unicorn." There is nothing wrong with AWALT, just as there would be nothing wrong with saying AMA…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/15 04:50 PM
4

bio-troofs I can tell this is going to be an intelligent discussion. Look, even current research suggests women are more emotional than men (and more reactive to emotional stimuli). Emotion clouds judgement. While not all men are more rational than all women, I believe that on average this is the case. As such, it seems that a greater propensity for pragmatism means a man is probably more likely to give decent relationship advice, regardless of the gender of the subject. Relationships are an inh…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/15 04:38 PM
2

Uh... Red Pill theory acknowledges sexual dimorphism and the fact that men and women have different mating strategies, thus a woman's advice is ineffectual when applied by men... E.g., "Never take relationship advice from a woman." That isn't "Women are the enemy"... it's "Women are different".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/15 04:20 PM
2

And here I totally agree with you -- "fat-shaming" is over-used. Probably as part of a defense to avoid criticism. It's hiding behind a shield and avoiding responsibility. Not fault (that's a complex issue with obesity), but responsibility -- esp. in dealing with the consequences of one's body weight. Nailed it.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:35 PM
1

Q: Did you do it once (or maybe a couple times), hate it, and then stop doing it? Or did you continue doing it despite the pain because he turned you on and you wanted to please him? Additionally, you don't know that it will be as bad with your new BF. He might end up being better at it. It also isn't something most people can just dive into, as eager as some people can be. If it is something your BF really wants to try, explain to him your concerns, that it's something you're not use to and fin…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 11:15 PM
2

The problem is, when you point out that someone takes up space and is spilling into you, has terrible body odor, and in general contributes to a negative affect on your life... the other side calls that shaming. You don't even have to say "You're a disgusting fat person." I just think it's kind of... a little childish to be so afraid of the word "shame". I've felt ashamed of myself before, and rightly so... it isn't the end of the world. Often it wasn't anything anyone else did that made me feel…
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:33 PM
1

I think there is a difference between making people feel bad directly, and circumstances that are the result of society viewing certain behaviors as negative/shameful (e.g., smokers being forced outdoors). It's a rather clear distinction. Screaming at someone who is fat because they've caused your medical premiums to go up is direct shaming. Policies that mandate that fat people have to pay even more than they currently do to offset premium costs are indirectly shaming (e.g., You feel like shit …
/r/MensRights06/08/15 09:23 PM
1

There is a difference between shaming someone personally, and a culture in which someone's behavior is considered shameful. The later is essentially how we dealt with smoking. We didn't scream in their faces, but we forced society to change (by showing smokers the door). I'm 100% in support of legislation that deals with the negative impacts fat people have on healthy people. E.g., if you're so big you spill over plane seats, you don't even board the plane until you buy a second ticket.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 07:03 PM
1

Social scientists Well that's your problem right there...
/r/MensRights06/08/15 04:20 PM
29

As a pretty liberal bloke, watching Free Speech on BBC makes me feel incredibly sympathetic to their conservative guests. Let's pack the audience with the whiniest college kids we can find, and not ask them to not hiss and jeer when someone says something factually correct that just happens to not sound very politically correct.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 06:30 PM
2

I haven't even heard the term Metro used in like 10 years. You're ignoring all the cultural context that existed while the term was popular, and stretching really far to justify your OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 07:57 PM
2

Maybe a legal system that works in their favor showering them with child support and alimony, not to mention government assistance? Maybe a lack of risk involved in filing for divorce against their boring BB husbands? Women file the majority of divorces, so maybe ask those single mothers why there are so many of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 07:34 PM
4

Metro isn't being gay . No shit, but it became associated with gay culture for a reason. You're literally arguing that resources for male improvement, and the men who use them, are Metro. How are our interests becoming more like womens'? Men have always sought mates. Creating resources to reach that goal is called fucking ingenuity. Seems like a trait often associated with masculinity to me. Is Natural Selection inherently Metro? Because, you know, NS often enhances secondary sex characteristics…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 07:26 PM
2

Fuck no. Everything on this planet reproduces, and a huge selection of that everything comes with a womb for giving birth to their young. It's completely unimpressive biologically (as a defining trait). What is far more impressive is the power of human intellect.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 07:18 PM
-1

RP (a bit Purple) Male, If there is an imbalance, I'd rather it be in them being slightly more attracted to me. Obviously attraction is a scale, but it can also be defined as a binary. If I'm sufficiently attracted to my partner that I want to be with them / fuck them, then at that point I care more about how into me they are. If I'm not attracted to them, no amount of their attraction will make up for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 07:13 PM
2

A woman's "approach" is usually more of offering an opening to men. E.g., "Please approach me!" signals. They certainly give these signals out more to higher status men. I don't think that's even a question. As for direct approaching, I think it's rare, but of course it makes sense that the more valuable a male is, the more women will try to get his attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 07:05 PM
1

This particular case is a problem of Zero-Tolerance mentality, along with a shitty judge who should lose his job because he's clearly allowing personal bias to affect his decisions. Limits definitely need to exist, but we have to understand that not every situation will be black and white, and it should be considered morally outrageous to ruin someone's life over situations such as in this article. There needs to be room for judgements to take extraneous factors into account. I don't know much a…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 06:59 PM
5

Metro was a fair step beyond just taking care of ones' self. There is a reason that it became attached to notions of gay fashion and culture. Remember "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy"? Just working out and wearing fitted/tailored clothing doesn't make you Metro. Metro is the guy who gets waxed (brows, body, and bootyhole), goes in for a mani-pedi, and often (not a requirement) wears flashy/flamboyant attire, not to mention spending a fortune on personal beauty/grooming products. Wanting to look …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 06:47 PM
1

If you're completely manic and need medication to moderate yourself, you should do that. Otherwise you won't be able to focus on the things that will improve your quality of life and status. Who cares if you have trouble getting it up? That's nothing compared to living a shit life that completely depresses you. And supplemental T should be something you can easily acquire. Go find a hippy "doctor" (naturopath? I dunno), or med up, suffer the issue, then go to your Doc and prove you need it. Stop…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 06:51 PM
1

Your excuses include: "If I don't medicate, I'm crazy and impossible to deal with." "If I medicate I might get fat." "If I medicate I might get ED." etc Choosing not to "aspire" to Alpha status is your response to the excuses. But being MGTOW doesn't mean you're going full Beta. You can be MGTOW and Alpha both. I think you're hung up on purely physical/more direct outward Alpha characteristics.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 06:02 PM
1

edit: Both pills, which is better for my success with women and as a BB, going unmedicated and being crazy neurotic like this, or being medicated, a bit more laid back and possibly weight gain or worse erectile dysfunction. Weight gain can be dealt with. Fatties love to cry about their condishuns, but the truth is that plenty of people lead healthy, active, fit lives on all kinds of medications for shit like PCOS or Hyperthyroid. Dealing with ED is the bigger problem... do what you can, and at l…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 03:27 PM
7

TBP fundamentally misunderstands AWALT because they're focused on social individuality over shared biological imperatives. AWALT refers to those imperatives, and TRP is about how to deal with them when they present. I think the "You can't generalize" argument is something more defensive. If AWALT is true, it reflects poorly on the entire sex. By acknowledging AWALT, a woman is saying "Given the right circumstances, I would do all the shit that TRP has become a response to." Men have biological i…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/15 07:41 PM
1

Of course women can act rationally. Just like men can act irrationally. Ever seen a dude get aggro in a bar? Is there a rational justification for it EVER? Hardly. The problem is that society coddles women who act irrationally and actively protects them from those actions. For men it's "You should have known better. Go directly to Jail. Do not pass go." Men experience greater consequences as a result of their actions. Women have less incentive to action rationally. That alone is a big problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 05:01 PM
1

Especially these days. Marriage rates are declining rapidly, and my guess is it's the higher value AF/ABs who are waiting, as opposed to the thirsty BBs.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 04:40 PM
1

Your usage is correct. I realize I added context to your argument you never intended (I was thinking in terms of the Court of Public Opinion).
/r/MensRights27/07/15 09:42 PM
4

It applies because popular opinion (based on what I see in the media) seems to condemn Mr. Cosby in spite of the lack of evidence.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 08:04 PM
9

Argumentum ad populum. I'm not going to condemn the man without evidence just because speculative consensus exists.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 07:44 PM
5

Wow, no need to get emotional. You know it makes you look childish when you swear like that. I'm not even going to bother replying to your argument because it is pretty clear you can't back it up with facts if you have to lower yourself to swearing. ^ Literally every idiot with too many feelz and not enough realz.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/15 11:21 PM
0

Asserting that RP is primarily about spinning plates and that there isn't a large population of men on TRP simply using RP theory to improve their SMV and their monogamous relationships...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 07:06 PM
13

Experiences means nothing if she isn't fun. There are plenty of Experienced Starfish out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 10:11 PM
5

I'm increasingly of the opinion that we need gender segregated classrooms. Boys and girls simply learn differently, and as long as we keep them together, one group is going to get preferential treatment. Put them in separate classrooms, and then focus each individual class on getting the most out of the students.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 05:16 PM
1

"Special services"... kind of like all the support centers Women have... also free/subsidized birth control. Paid maternity leave... already exists and is more common/longer than paternity leave. More contraception nonsense. Why are male BC options taking forever to come to fruition? More medical costs. See: Subsidized/free BC. Ah... men can't tolerate pain. The group of people sacrificing their lives in the most dangerous jobs on the planet. What a bunch of pussies. Fuck these ignorant people. …
/r/MensRights20/07/15 06:07 PM
11

Never got talks like this from anyone. It was mostly just "Oh the ladies will love your eyes, just be yourself! You'll find someone eventually." If this is so common, why does TRP have over 120,000 subs? For every anecdote out there, there's a counter anecdote, as well as thousands upon thousands of unhappy men who got zero insight into how to interact with the opposite sex (or even socialize in general for some).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 05:06 PM
1

Men and women evolved different sexual strategies to maximize success. These are ingrained in us at a genetic level, and it makes us hard to understand one another. As a result, we often ascribe values such as "immoral" and "evil" to the behaviors that we don't understand. TRP rectifies this issue by exploring mating strategy dimorphism, and going to bat against the "it's all just socialization" theoretical nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 06:52 PM
1

Completely disagree that the comparison is unfair. One of the first things people notice about couples is how tall they are (6'0" and 5'0": OMG THEY'RE SO CUTE! 6'0" and 5'10" OMG THEY'RE PERFECT FOR EACH OTHER!) Two inches is significant, and can't be hidden like 20-30 extra pounds can be, especially when the norm is not only for her to be shorter, but significantly shorter (by 6 inches). Average healthy weight, by BMI, is about 160lbs for a 5'10" man. The average 5'4" woman weighing the same i…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 06:47 PM
2

Oh no! ... Plenty of other places to discuss RP topics.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 05:57 PM
0

It's so simply they can't see it. "I'm telling you what you need to do if you want to maintain this relationship." vs. "I'm telling you what makes me happy with the relationship, but leaving out the obvious consequences if you don't keep up." They're exactly the same, but one pussyfoots around half the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 09:50 PM
1

It is, and it isn't. Wealth and earning potential are primary factors in BB relationships, but high levels are indicative of AF potential. Status may not make women wet, but it makes them more likely to seek out those men and sleep with them to secure BB. But anything that contributes to getting you sex is fair market SMV. It is certainly possible, of course, for the High Status Man lose his sexual access by not displaying confidence and assertiveness, but I guarantee that status will provide th…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 07:31 PM
3

Taxpayer issues aside... I can't believe that idiot said that Egalitarianism is a MensRights movement, and that Feminism is a "human" movement. What fucking nonsense.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 06:00 PM
7

They're literally mocking him because he's ignorant of better courses of action (in their opinion). It's like mocking mocking a teenage home-schooler for not knowing facts their parents refused to teach them. These fucking people...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 04:59 PM
1

Wanting to fuck isn't Beta behavior, it's goddamn nature. It's our biological imperative. Being a Beta and wanting to change that to secure sexual success does not mean that seeking improvement and sexual success is necessarily Beta behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 04:21 PM
2

It actually makes plenty of sense, though is hypocritical. If you wish to be promiscuous, it still benefits you to be promiscuous with non-promiscuous partners, in order to mitigate certain risks (risk of disease, as well as risk of losing plates due to their own promiscuity). It also is certainly not uncommon for women to desire experienced men who are highly prized by other women... but also have clean records.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 07:49 PM
7

Plenty of TRPers care, and are not into plate-spinning.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 07:38 PM
2

The real issue here is that we should just ignore anyone who falls back on "slut-shaming" as an argument against the criticism of negative behavior. If promiscuity is statistically likely to result in less LTR success, and LTR success is desired, then promiscuity is a negative behavioral trait. There is no difference between someone saying "Promiscuity is a negative behavioral trait," and someone saying "Promiscuous slags are worthless LTR material and you should just hit it and move on." Both a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 07:14 PM
5

I didn't make that claim. I was merely pointing out an undeniable truth that you were quick to dismiss in order to poo-poo on TRPers. I don't buy the notion that women desire earning potential/status more than physical attractiveness, but I absolutely agree that they value it more than men do, and thus it is a greater factor in their mating strategy. If that is a core tenet of TRP, then I disagree on that point, but despite LeGrand has stated, I'm not sure it is based on my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 05:12 PM
7

Uh, the market absolutely has changed (>60% people overweight or obese, far more women in the workforce, etc), and the culture narrative is hugely different (more opposition to gender roles and nuclear families). Human nature, however, is not apt to significant change regardless of the narrative being driven by vocal minorities. It is an incredibly safe assumption that measures of attractiveness are stable across generations.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 04:44 PM
2

I guess that means "Rude Boy" by Rhianna is misandrist then.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 04:28 PM
6

TRPers and BPers are both biased. You're not breaking any new ground there. But the foundation of TRP is that mainstream beliefs about male-female relationships, gender roles, etc are NON-objective and create a false narrative that is detrimental to male sexual (+other) success.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 04:25 PM
5

Being objective about things that might paint a negative picture is not the same thing as blind hatred to the picture's subject.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/15 11:57 PM
1

In a time of rampant drug use and casual sex, a man buys recreational drugs and uses them during sexual encounters. Questions of consent will continue to remain unanswered unless Mr. Cosby affirms the allegations against him. TL;DR: Nothing has changed, and I refuse to throw my lot in with either side.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 06:23 PM
2

It also seems to me that hyper-successful outliers tend strongly toward sociopathic behavior, and thus qualify as "devious" or non-"nice". Look at politicians and CEOs. This is purely my anecdotal assumption of course. You're right on about the risk associated with delaying success. It seemed the video was quick to note that "devious" success begins to fail, but never touched the fact that delaying success should increase the chance of never attaining success. It likely wasn't even looked at as …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 11:15 PM
16

The video explicitly refutes its own assertion. They note that "devious" strategies result in greater initial succes, but that "nice" strategies result in greater overall success later. I.E., Nice guys finish last. "Nice guys finish last" means they find success later. The video seems to try to interpret the saying as they finish "worse". That seems like a willful misinterpretation of the saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 09:41 PM
1

Being rich, as a woman, isn't the sexual status booster that it is for men. Sugar Mamas and MILFs are not necessarily the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/15 05:23 PM
7

Women hate "Mr. Mom's", and get all sploosh-y for "Mr. Fixit" men who do "Manly" chores. Ending gender roles will just make it even harder for men to build fulfilling relationships. Ultimate Beta Bux society.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/15 01:14 AM
10

You want to talk about circle jerking? This sub has two going on at once, and few people step outside their own circle for fear of getting splashed by the other. That said... There are some decent discussions occasionally, but so too does TRP often have some good posts from people who aren't "Anger-phase". Glancing at TBP, it just looks like SRS-Lite. Jerking each other over "OMG look what one guy in one thread on TRP said today!" At least here BPers will actually discuss theory a bit. TRP / PPD…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/15 02:02 PM
6

US government statistics show... Anyone actually have the stats the article is based on?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 06:50 PM
5

"Find myself" is just code for "find a higher SMV mate". A woman who has maxed out in terms of partner SMV will not care about this. "Be independent" means "you're scaring off my better options". "Have some fun" means "find higher SMV dick". Girls who realize they have better options than their current BFs use this as an excuse to avoid a confrontational breakup.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/15 07:58 PM
20

He's floating through clouds of breasts dreaming unconsciously as she assaults him, wakes up, and freaks out... I believe he even struggles against his bonds to shake her off... if memory serves. He was unconscious and unwilling. He was raped.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 05:27 PM
1

Success is absolutely part of TRP, though financial success specifically doesn't get much discussion. "Be better and make something of yourself" and that's about it. You're still trying to distill this down way too far.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/15 03:58 PM
2

Your value by being a successful, bread-winning male is worth more than the 5% risk of infidelity. What kind of lazy idiot gives up success because he's afraid of a 5% chance of infidelity? Guess what, if you're successful, and she cheats, you can dump her and replace her easily. I'd also really like to see the full study before making any major judgements based on ThinkTank, HuffPo, and a free abstract with almost zero info.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/15 03:13 AM
5

And note that as equality has increased, marriage rates have dropped. Women aren't settling for men who are their equal, and men are learning not to bow to women who constantly demand more out of them. This shit ain't rocket science.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/15 08:14 PM
2

Good quote a little ways down. Taken from the comments on the article: "Can I add an important disclaimer. The film in question, was an adapation of a book. About a 55 year old man dating a women in her early 20s. Shouldn't we start questioning why 37 year old actresses are applying to play the role of a 22 year old women?" I don't know anything about the book, but I feel that this is important information. edit: Definitely worth noting this information isn't confirmed, so take it with a grain o…
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 07:48 PM
6

The Feminists I know in real life do not wish to "drink male tears", but some are extremely hostile to facts/data that appear to contradict their beliefs. Additionally, they have a poor understanding (or feign such) of the difference between equal opportunity, and equality of outcome, desiring both as part of their ideology. They are good at cherrypicking data that supports their position, while completely denying massive studies, such as the >140,000 sample size CONSAD report put together for t…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 07:06 PM
2

A woman can make herself a better person in many ways just as a man can, however, there is a difference in how much weight each gender puts on various qualities of attractiveness. For men, youthfulness and physical beauty is disproportionately more important. Just because you can make yourself better in general, doesn't mean it will drastically affect your SMV in the eyes of men. The genders view SMV differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 06:16 PM
7

I don't think it's easy to quantify overall value, so I would say "No"... with the caveat that the genders are clearly valuable in differing ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 05:49 PM
1

"High" is relative, and status can make up huge differences. Obviously I could cite below-average height celebrities, but they are extreme cases. Short guys can have above-average to high SMV if they work for it. E.g., A 6' average looking beta lmight get more initial interest / first dates than an average looking 5'5" with confidence and a successful career, but the 5'5" will likely outperform on most (if not all) follow-ups.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/15 04:07 PM
7

Ah, I think you're right about alimony, but I'm pretty sure you're wrong about child support ending. Of course this could vary by state for all I know. But yes, it is possible to remain unmarried, but still receive support from the new guy, and continue to collect alimony. Easy system to take advantage of.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/15 07:53 PM
1

There is no evolutionary reason for women to be attracted to much older men. Define "much older". non-TRPers seem to have this idea that TRP thinks guys start dropping panties once they go gray. Part of the misunderstanding between the truth of TRP, and the caricature of TRP. Even in 50 Shades of Grey the guy is only 27... Why isn't he 37 or 47? He doesn't have to be. Again, why are you assuming that TRP holds this notion? The guy in 50 shades of gray is, above all else, domineering and successf…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/15 06:53 PM
10

This highlights part of the problem with alimony. If women were essentially "used up" after marriage and could never find another provider, it does make sense to provide something for them. But that's not how reality is. While the divorce rate is 50%, the truth is that the actual volume of divorces is concentrated in a small group of people who get married and divorced multiple times. So if women are getting divorced and jumping right back into new marriages, there is no reason they should be re…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/15 06:38 PM
6

And it's unlikely it was due to him buying a couple McD coffees, and acquiescing to find a table. I'd just chalk it up to him being used by someone who had no actual interest in the first place. Either that, or based on his cringe-inducing post, I'm guessing he's not as "really cute and interesting (for reals!)" in person as he thinks. Maybe even catfished her.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 11:13 PM
5

So grab a fist full of hair and take over.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 10:56 PM
5

If a woman is historically and habitually unable to maintain a relationship, this is a demonstration of low relationship value. A single case of being "alpha widowed" does not completely devalue someone. This is true for men as well. What is true in practice is not necessarily true in desire, however. I fail to see any dissonance. And? Just because the situation results in a small number of ideal candidates doesn't mean there is necessarily anything wrong with it. Wanting many women but wanting …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/15 08:29 PM
2

In your description you're basing attractiveness on the subjective desires of opposite sexes. That seems to me not to address the question of biological attractiveness. I think if you're objectively taking both genders on the whole (imagine an alien makes first contact and this is the first question we ask them... WHO'S HOTTER!?), men are actually more attractive... and I say that as a straight man. My reasoning: Men have greater levels of testosterone, which has been shown to improve youthfulne…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/15 05:02 PM
2

To a lesser extent, this sums up my high school and early college experience. It wasn't until I was halfway through college that I grew a pair of balls. I'm not as tall as you, and a lot of the attention I got was more subtle, but looking back, it was there. I basically realized I'm a handsome idiot with no game. Not nearly as bad as I use to be, and I'm more aware now thankfully.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/15 03:40 PM
4

Realizing this is a bit of a tangent/rant now that I'm finished writing it... I'm getting to the point that I think gendered schooling (all boys/girls schools) are the right way to go, even in the public system. First of all, you avoid nonsense like budding young tumblrettes blaming the boys in their school for shit they have no control over, like dress code enforcement. Second, it seems pretty clear at this point that the focus on girls in education has come at a huge cost to boys. Separating t…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 07:12 PM
11

Simply supporting traditional gender roles can net you quite a bit of hate from even non-radicals.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 04:54 PM
-4

And yet people tolerate "Blue Pill" or gynocentric subs that immediately ban people for holding conflicting beliefs or simply posting there while having a history on TRP/MensRights/etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 04:46 PM
1

High T is wasted with poor socialization, but someone with high T will generally be more aggressive, and that is a competitive advantage someone with low T won't have. Would you rather be aggressive and dominant with no "learned game"... or would you rather be witty and funny but passive and submissive?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 03:34 PM
3

Yes, there are "alpha genes". Who you are is a combination of your genetics and your environment. It is entirely possible to be born with more potential to display alpha traits than the next guy. I'm of the mind (based on what I've read regarding nature/nurture, twins studies...) that environment is a weaker factor. Those of us born around the middle of the bell curve can certainly work hard and bump ourselves up a tier or two with enough knowledge and determination... but those at the bottom of…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 03:28 PM
27

Not a single thing you just mentioned is a "trick". "Dread game" - Being confident and displaying to your partner that you're desirable regardless of their current actions / state. "Negging" - Does TRP even talk about this anymore? Hell, negging has become a joke in mainstream media. TEASING girls is nothing new, which is all negging really was in the first place, just slightly more specific. "Holding Frame" - Maintaining confidence in yourself when questioned / pushed by others; not letting peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 07:33 PM
2

"The Friendzone" is sort of a self-fulfilling prophecy for any guy who is unattractive to his target but who fails to give up and move on. Sure, there are women out there who milk these guys for all the resources and attention they can get, but I think in most cases the Zone exists due to the efforts of the men in most cases, not the woman. The man is desperate for the affects of the woman, and so builds the Friendship dynamic hoping to segue into a romantic relationship. TL;DR: It exists, but n…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/15 07:23 PM
7

The decisions you make in life help to define your character. Just because you're ashamed of some of those decisions doesn't mean they're above criticism. If you've been a slut your whole life and then find someone you want to settle down with, why is it wrong of them to judge you for those past actions? If you've been rude to people your whole life and then meet someone you like but who doesn't like rude people, is it wrong of them to judge you for being so rude in the past despite your efforts…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/15 07:15 PM
1

True, but you were replying to a post about plummeting marriage rates and commitment, with no mention of being completely relationship-averse. The stats you presented seem to support not getting married as a smart choice for men, considering they get the same benefits from cohabiting, without the risks of a marriage contract. Further, the article specifies "happy marriages" as conferring benefits (but only in relation to single people, not cohabiting couples). Without the study itself, there see…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/15 06:46 PM
4

80% decrease for men in co-habitating relationships. E.g., includes un-married couples who probably are more sexually active. Sadly, the only direct link to the study I could actually find is broken. So yeah, considering statements like this: Happily married individuals undergoing heart bypass surgery are three times more likely to stay alive 15 years later than their single peers, Sherman told the Deseret News., the headline seems like a huge stretch. So who's conscious about obscuring truth he…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/15 06:02 PM
5

Yeah, don't bother reading past the headline. However, not every marriage can promote longevity – some can even be considered harmful. The study has been criticized for blind spots, such as its omission of differing degrees of marriage. High-conflict marriages have been shown to cause more stress, the study’s authors conceded. Marriage is a mixed bag, Brooke wrote in the study. “A bad marriage can be lethal to your healthand emotional well-being, but a good marriage can bring countless emotional…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/15 05:45 PM
2

So, based purely on the aspect of love, you are asserting that one gender is universally more rational than another? Just trying to make sure I understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/15 05:33 PM
1

Feminism is a gendered term. As such, it is exclusionary by nature. If Feminists truly support equality and wish to distance themselves from "gender warriors" and other radicals, they should simply call themselves Egalitarians. For fun, watch a bunch of "feminists" shout down another woman who doesn't label herself a feminist because she disagrees with radical elements of feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/15 09:01 PM
5

RP is a state of understanding, not a state of being. As others have said, you can be an RP Omega or a BP Alpha, the difference is that the RP Omega understands the philosophy and social dynamics that have lead to his status. The BP Alpha has been dealt all the right cards and believes that 'Just be yourself' is fine advice to give his lower-tier friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 06:25 PM
15

As someone with a lot of training experience, and a BS in Kinesiology, "functional athleticism" means training specifically for sport. Crossfit, and similar programs, can box-jump up its own ass. The only thing functional about most HIIT programs is the function of being good at that program, and they're only efficient at what they do. There's nothing more efficient at building strength and mass than loading iron. But if a newcomer doesn't like traditional gyms and would rather do HIIT, then tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 09:44 PM
2

ITT: BPers who continue to view TRP as its caricature and assume "Alpha" means narcissistic meathead.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 09:33 PM
11

This overlaps almost entirely with TRP, so I'm not sure which side you're coming from. The only difference is TRP comes with a big plate of philosophy about gender roles/dimorphism.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 09:19 PM
5

There was a poster in OP's link who said that r/TwoX is the first place he saw someone argue that boys should be allowed to wear dresses... as if that is suggestive of an environment where real men's issues are a concern. But such an example only proves that Feminism has an anti-masculine agenda, and that they blame male issues on masculinity. "If only men could be more feminine and emotionally expressive, they wouldn't be offing themselves at 5x the rate women are!" It's such a red herring, and…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 07:43 PM
10

I found an article on DailyMail after this news broke, and the comments are disgusting. "Bullet through the head..." "Lock the animal up for life..." Two different commenters question if he could be innocent since the case is on-going, and people call both of them "sick", and point to the number of alleged victims as proof. People are fucking disgusting.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:48 PM
5

I really want to post this to my Facebook with a joke quip thoughtful point about Cosby, but I'm pretty sure I'd offend so many people I'd be talking to HR before Noon.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:41 PM
0

And it wouldn't be as helpful either. TRP's strong language helps break through male hamstering. TRP continues to grow in popularity not only because it works in cutting through the bullshit, but also because the "offensive" language brings it attention which brings curious people with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 07:42 PM
66

Didn't you hear? The new definition includes pressuring someone into sex (but it doesn't count because he's a guy and they always want to screw everything, right? He must be impotent if he won't fuck a planetoid).
/r/MensRights31/03/15 08:13 PM
67

She's literally drugging him so he'll have sex with her. By definition, it absolutely is.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 07:40 PM
1

Ehhhh... I kind of disagree. I can see how much of TRP material is or seems disparaging to women; absolutely. But TRP is about building up male self-perception. Most of the advice you see is to work out, get in shape, treat yourself better, get new hobbies, take command of your life, etc. These are all self-esteem building goals. The narrative that goes along with it often tears women down, but honestly it's just a harsh pill to bring groveling men back to reality. The people who come to TRP typ…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 05:16 PM
6

He's also assuming that women don't spin plates, and will be monogamous while the men are polygamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 09:45 PM
1

While I'm not exactly an advocate for it, so I don't have data on-hand, I was under the impression that, at least up through the High School level, single-sex institutions were better learning environments for both boys and girls. As long as both men and women have the same opportunities (e.g., class availability), I don't see a problem with single-sex universities, assuming the learning advantage holds true for adults.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 09:24 PM
2

How is it not different? There is a reason that for essentially as long as BASEBALL HAS EXISTED we have referred to making out and groping as distinctly different degrees of physical intimacy. For fucks sake, in some cultures people kiss relatively often in purely platonic relationships. Would you honestly not react differently if someone you were friendly with tried to grab you between the legs vs stepping in for a kiss, neither of which you were asking for? My personal reaction to the former w…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 09:01 PM
1

It's a generalization. When someone says "STFU, AWALT" in response to someone questioning whether a girl is "NAWALT", it's simply to prevent them from seeing their situation through rose-tinted glasses. Almost everyone I know who hates TRP, hates the CARICATURE of TRP based on the loudest posters and the most extreme stickies/sidebars. TRP is about taking control of your life, not bending over backwards for someone just to get laid (which is a goddamn epidemic), being confident, building a satis…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 07:06 PM
8

That's great, but it still ignores that there are degrees to the issue. I don't give a shit if Dunn wants to condemn people who see it as a continuum. If a guy goes to kiss a girl, she withdraws, and he continues, that's an obvious line crossed. If a guy goes to kiss a girl and, in surprise, she doesn't withdraw, but she also didn't want it so she stops anything further... that's different. She might still be affected by the interaction, but that's not assault. That is a misunderstanding. And wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 06:44 PM
7

"When we use ambiguous terms we grossly overestimate the problem, but when we use black-and-white terms we must be underestimating it because... reasons." Maybe the problem is we need to stop lumping every unwanted act into the same category. Getting kissed by some guy you didn't like shouldn't be in the same category as a guy feeling you up after you told him no. There is a reason why in the work place some thing will get you fired immediately, and others will get you a "Please don't do that," …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 06:20 PM
3

No and no. And none of the idiots in that thread can even define what makes it creepy. All they do is strawman the OP and talk about how "gross" it is. 90% of how they feel about the guy being creepy is based on them hating TRP. If the commenters were 19, and a good looking, charming 26yo approached them, they'd be bending over backwards to lock him down.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/15 08:35 PM
1

Parents made all my meals until, I dunno, High School, at which point I was expect to make my own lunches at the least. I was expected to do my own laundry somewhat prior to HS. I don't quite recall exactly. My parents helped me with my homework whenever I asked. In terms of grades; I was a rambunctious child and got in trouble at school but generally did good (I was in advanced classes up until HS). They tried to get me "help" for my anxiousness and I was declared "borderline ADHD", but never m…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/15 09:52 PM
17

Next week on TRP: "If you break frame when a priest fondles your butthole you're a Beta pussy. Man up and clench those cheeks, beeyotch." This shit ain't fucking constructive.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 07:04 PM
1

Knowledge is power. I give it to the ugly RPer, but obviously it isn't just as simple as "Pill Status". Simple physical attractiveness is only a small piece of the Male Sexual Strategy pie. Whichever "Piller" has more social status will have an advantage. Assuming both guys are essentially identical, raised on the same gynocentric media bullshit, same job, same hobbies, etc... I give it to the RPer simply because he has an information advantage. He has tools in front of him to adapt and improve …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 05:15 PM
14

A stable 2-parent household facilitates having and raising healthy well-adjusted children. The fact that you sign a piece of paper and call it a marriage has nothing to do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 05:04 PM
24

There's nothing special about marriage. You know what's special? Two people who stay together for 15 years out of real desire, without the threat of financial ruin lingering over their heads (well, one of them) to keep them together.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 12:41 AM
4

I guess I use to qualify as "Feminist" by Feminism's own definition... I've always been very Liberal, have always voted Dem, and followed women's issues pretty closely (BC, abortion, the "wage gap", etc). I'm still very left politically, but I started to try and be more discerning about my own confirmation bias. I got pretty into the various fact-checking hubs around the net, and as I noticed some of my favorite liberal news blogs posting more and more spin and less fact I stopped actively follo…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/15 07:13 PM
5

Another common trope is "He drove her into the arms of another man." Men often get blamed when their partners cheat on them. Pretty fucked up.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/15 05:38 PM
12

The world isn't black and white, but men have a tendency to assume their woman (or desired woman) is a special snowflake who exists outside the bellcurve. AWALT combats that mindset. That's basically it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 10:33 PM
3

My single anecdotal about the target demographic for a fetish movie doesn't invalidate my analysis of general male attractiveness and female access to high value males.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 10:23 PM
2

TRP is full of Anger-Phase recent converts. Most TRPers love women, and want to love women (emotionally and physically), but they don't know how to do it without seeming clingy and undesirable until after they've swallowed the pill and taken in some learning. The language of TRP is largely to shock people out of their state of mind and help them transition. Having been sub'd there for quite some time (mostly as a lurker), I would say that only some of the most intensely hateful language is legit…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 07:31 PM
7

I don't know anyone who was more excited to see that shitty movie than the 50-something married mother with bolt-ons who sends me sexually suggestive (sometimes overt) texts once or twice a year. I'm MUCH younger than her. Your analysis of the character AND the target demographic is right on the money, regardless of pill ingestion. He is a man who has attained status long before his peers AND is still young and virile. He's an aging cougar's wet dream, let alone almost any straight woman alive. …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 07:10 PM
5

RP and I care quite a lot about what women want or think, assuming I have any kind of rapport with them (friends, friendly acquaintances, GFs). The problem is, to be successful with women romantically, I can't let that out except in small doses. That said, you're not a statistical aberration, you're simply confusing the meaning of "Alpha". Alpha doesn't mean some guy who's super bro-y and disgusting. It's a guy who takes charge and leads, who isn't easily manipulated, who's respected by other me…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 06:43 PM
3

Explain why non-straight search terms are so much more popular in extremely conservative areas, and then you'll have your answer. Minorities with fetishes, or lack of socially acceptable outlets, skew the stats in their favor, away from the social norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 06:35 PM
5

Use to be a huge supporter, now I'm just a silent one, and even that might wane. Their FB postings showing up on my feed reached a clickbaity fever-pitch (lots of "77c" type stuff), and I ended up blocking their content and sending them a message why. I think they still do good things (almost entirely), but with the recent rhetoric, and now things like this, I worry about them just becoming a radical soapbox.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 05:23 PM
2

Women are more inherently risk averse than men, so this is fairly expected. That said, I know of far more women than men (anecdotally) who will post to social media about road incidences as they happen. That said, men are also still more likely to text-and-drive and engage in other risky road behavior. No delusions there regarding my gender. I was more concerned with media representation.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 09:11 PM
1

Direct Link that I should have started with instead of the shitty click-bait website.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 07:36 PM
1

A friend just shared this video on her Facebook feed. My initial thought was that, yes, it often feels really good to disconnect from the online world for a while. My second thought was that if the genders in this video were reversed, feminists would be outraged. Literally every example of social media addiction in this video involved men ignoring their friends, men ignoring their female partners, or men isolating themselves at home on their devices.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 07:31 PM
13

A quick Google search suggests that SI:Swimsuit's buyer demographics are shifting towards women. I guess they figure that with print media tanking, they can shore up lost numbers by pandering harder to women?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:35 PM
5

The author comes so close only to completely derail at the end and pass all the blame once again onto "the Patriarchy" which is the root of all problems in human history, as if women have no agency or ability to influence the society around them. And now I'm glad I came to the comments instead of giving Cracked my click. Thank you.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 12:49 AM
7

Well you're a fanboy I see. That's your take-away from me calling out his writing staff and being interested in discussing topics with Stewart in a neutral setting? God forbid someone breaks the circle jerk and wants to be rational with the opposition when they're not pandering to their audience.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 08:14 PM
6

Liberal white-knight writing staff? I wouldn't mind having a beer with Stewart and actually discussing some of these things 1-on-1 with him to see if he's open to the ridiculousness of it all.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 07:11 PM
1

I don't always agree with Ms Paglia, but she's absolutely right about the effects of a "gender-neutralization" on society. CHSommers' video at Yale touched on this as well.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 06:57 PM
16

If you wander into any medical subreddit discussions of the topic, there is a vast number of "medical professionals" who trot out laundry lists of reasons that they support circumcision. Most of their arguments boil down to "Uncircumcised boys are at 0.0X% risk of each of these problems if they don't get circumcised. If they're circumcised, the risk is lower, or 0% for all of those. So obviously we should circumcise everyone. It's not like you NEED foreskin anyway." It's pretty fucked up. They'r…
/r/MensRights22/01/15 06:45 PM
3

"And shaking John Kerry's hand was also extremely surreal. He didn't really know who I was, and even when Senator Gillibrand introduced me no one seemed to know who I was. But that's okay." No one at the SOTU knew who she was. So sad. Wah! Why am I not a Social Justice Celebrity!? Why don't the most powerful people in the world not know about me and my struggle? She was "let down" by the SOTU, says nothing about what a fucking honor it is to be invited. Clearly only cares about attention. She's …
/r/MensRights22/01/15 06:32 PM
29

It isn't exactly news that feminists basically have a stranglehold on social issue wiki pages. Maybe next time show us the bullshit edits instead of making a shitpost about a user name.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 06:24 PM
7

Feminists trying to fix problems using blatant sexism. What could go wrong?
/r/MensRights22/01/15 06:15 PM
2

She might as well just be an egalitarian, who has a goal of cleaning up the Feminist movement because she views it classically as having profoundly benefited women. She refers to current popular feminism as "gender feminism", and she consistently speaks out about a need to support men and boys both socially and academically.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 12:09 AM
3

NationalReview. Conservative outlet. Obvious anti-woman bias. Mansplaining. Female author clearly suffering internal misogyny. /s (Just in case)
/r/MensRights21/01/15 11:44 PM
2

Unless a woman is giving off a really odd vibe, I generally take them all at roughly the same level. Although I would say there are distinct differences between women who compliment for something in return, women who compliment just to be genuinely nice (platonic), and those who compliment as a display of interest. Generally equally flattering though.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 12:34 AM
1

I find my close female friends are actually not as in line with the currently vocal Feminist ideologues. Many of them are just fine with gender differences, and don't see thing like "Cat Calling" as big political issues. Other friends are deep in the Feminist sphere and appear incredulous when confronted with evidence that goes against their narrative. In my personal experience, there is a major divide in tone (not that I'm the tone police, though I've been accused) between discussions of gender…
/r/MensRights20/01/15 07:39 PM
-1

Haha, yes, quite. To be fair though, the article itself is hand-waving significant genetic / gender differences and making a case for female metabolic efficiently based on slim margins and extreme situations, though it all sounds nice and sciency. In the end it seems pointless, because the metabolic differences will never make up the gender physicality differences, and he fails to conclude with anything really meaningful except "It's okay to eat carbs, and you can lose weight just like men can."…
/r/MensRights14/01/15 01:30 AM
-4

Misleading title, but the article is actually pretty bad. His science sounds good, but a lot of his conclusions are pretty bad. Example: Men have greater visceral / subcutaneous fat ratio, and he claims this is a bad thing. Googling the topic calls this into question, but I'm willing to go with it. True or not, visceral fat is very important as it acts as a protective barrier between your organs, and between those organs and your bones. As far as I'm aware, these visceral fat stores are less lik…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 08:35 PM
7

It reminds me quite a bit of classic PUA "rapport" game that use to be a big topic (maybe still is?). The questions start light and fun, but become very personal, so there are these waves of comfort, vulnerability, deep connection, and then back again. The eye-contact goes kind of opposite. Intense eye-contact creates huge feelings of vulnerability for most people. It's amazing how many people can't hold eye-contact with strangers for more than a second or two. So when you force it, you're forci…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/15 06:42 PM
5

Lauer looked like every typical engaged, thoughtful interviewer in mainstream media I've ever seen. Legs crossed? BETA BP. Serious? Half the time he was leaning in looking like he was processing Tom's inane bullshit. The only difference was that Tom was in an actively aggressive position the entire time, but Lauer never seemed obviously affected by it and you could easily say that he maintained frame (albeit a less dominant frame), even talking over Tom multiple times to make a point. Yes, Tom a…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 01:25 AM
0

This was refreshing. SJWs paint their opponents as rapid conservative fringers, and then I come in here and see people complaining about liberals and socialists, essentially giving weight to the allegations (granted, SJWs identify as "progressives"/leftist). Nice to know that "we" are truthfully more independent, and stretch pretty evenly across party lines. Just more evidence that our first-past-the-post electoral system is horrible broken and does little to actually represent the populous.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 07:14 PM
17

We're not into rehab over here. Do the crime, do the time... then we kick you out onto the streets almost ensuring you'll become a repeat offender.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 10:41 PM
2

Listen and believe. /s
/r/MensRights04/12/14 07:08 PM
2

No, it isn't. But that won't stop people from saying so.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 08:44 PM
2

It's a break from reality and a self-perpetuating myth. Society's reaction to rape doesn't reflect the narrative of disbelief. When women don't report they reinforce the narrative themselves. They are literally the architects of their own oppression.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 08:03 PM
1

I don't doubt this as a possibility as I take issue with parts of her story, but men already get accused of exaggerating false rape accusations, and I'd rather not feed the flames.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 07:53 PM
1

Not sure what to flair. I'm annoyed by the hypocrisy behind the narrative of disbelief, so I went with "Reverse Genders".
/r/MensRights03/12/14 07:09 PM
1

Listen and believe, ya bloody cunt. Cuont. Coooooont. I'm bad with accents.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 10:21 AM
3

"Listen and believe" doesn't apply to privileged, rich, white men.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 09:53 PM
1

I thought equity (as in reference to something being equitable) was just about freedom from bias. Fair treatment under the law, for instance, would be considered equitable. Hence, Equity Feminism is in reference to the original movement seeking equal rights.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 12:57 AM
15

She is. She's a registered Democrat with (as I see it) Libertarian leanings, who's "Factual Feminist" channel is associated with a Conservative research and advocacy group (American Enterprise Institute). Not to dredge up Reddit memes but... Gender Feminists HATE her.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 07:59 PM
11

Equity Feminists are people like CH Sommers (self-described I believe). Gender Feminists are those who (at least appear to) care more about gender roles than the rights movement.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 07:35 PM
42

Context please. Are they actual equity feminists who are making fun of the outrage? Or are they Tumblrinas who don't get the irony? Great image either way.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:00 PM
1

Because it's untrue. While the differences between plans and attempts may not be statistically significant, I'm pretty sure actual rates of suicide (fatalities thereof) are. So he was disputing the notion that women attempt more. I assume because the claim is often used as a reason women are "more often victims" of suicide and depression, when that alone misrepresents the truth. FYI: I suck at stats.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 02:18 AM
2

The American Foundation for Suicide Prevention cites yearly CDC data, and men have never suffered fewer fatal attempts than women, or even come close. The disparity is significant.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 01:15 AM
1

Edit: I can't statistical significant. So basically, differences between SUICIDES are significant at a rate of 20 to 5, however rate of attempts are not. That, plus this CDC document suggests that "the old canard" is absolutely true. I see no mention anywhere that there is any real equivalence between genders when it comes to suicide. Females attempt 1.5x as often, but Males succeed nearly 4x as often (79% of successful suicides are male). I'm not seeing how you're drawing your 1000/1000 conclus…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 01:07 AM
12

"Don't fucking touch me" is basically a step bellow "I'll scream 'rape'!" It's crying wolf, and it's a threat, plain and simple. The threat of convincing the public you are guilty of false crimes, to coerce them into acting on / attacking you on your behalf. Fuck anyone who acts like that.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 09:18 PM
2

That's the first thing they attack. "She's a Republican!" "She's an actor!" Maybe she is, maybe she isn't. So what? Refute the facts or STFU. Every video of hers I've seen so far has been seriously on point.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/14 07:08 PM
1

They need a better writing team for their "predators". I had trouble suspending my disbelief.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/14 10:50 PM
11

DISCLAIMER: Not equating TRP, MRM, GG, or any other groups as being representative of each other. "TheRedPill", a community that tangentially overlaps with, but is not representative of, the Men's Rights movement. It is primarily concerned with male self-improvement, dating, and various other issues associated with the notion that men have been raised under a false reality (hence, "taking TheRedPill" represents opening your eyes to the "real"). The subreddit has a lot of very angry young men who…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 07:00 PM
2

I couldn't keep reading after "prison harms women more than men". Too much rage.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 06:24 PM
11

I'll be the first person to get in line to support the prosecution of false accusations, but this title is just editorializing to generate shock value. She was bi-polar for fucks sake. Significant numbers of bipolar people commit suicide, and a large percentage of all suicides ARE people with bipolar disorder. It also wouldn't surprise me if such people were more likely to make such false accusations. Again, not giving her a pass. But let's try not to be cunty about it.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 09:57 PM
6

Have always been a huge fan of both, but Stewart in particular is gallons deep into the Feminist Kool-Aid by now. I'm Liberal by US standards, but The Daily Show is a pretty serious echo chamber. There are plenty of issues I agree with him, but plenty others where it's clear they aren't researching beyond whatever talking points are being thrown at them. Personally, I love when he has Conservatives and Libertarians on as guests, and wish they'd spend more time having fun two-sided debates, inste…
/r/TheRedPill04/11/14 07:57 PM
3

Talk about a non-starter. Completely unconstitutional. No speech based on sex and orientation meant to intimidate? Reminds me of WBC and plenty of campus/street preachers. Not that I approve of either, but I'm not about to censor them "because feelings".
/r/TheRedPill04/11/14 12:50 AM
3

every single one of the men who were featured in the video suffer more discrimination in a single week of their lives than that woman will suffer until the end of her life Cat-calling is certainly a pathology endemic to poor/disadvantaged populations, but I totally hadn't thought of it specifically in the way you framed it. Kudos. This should be repeated more.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 08:10 PM
55

"In passing". Kind of like every other comment they included, except the one creeper who followed her for 5 minutes.
/r/TheRedPill31/10/14 06:05 PM
3

Not suggesting LDRs are a good idea, but if you do find yourself in one, the rule for Skype should be no different (really) than the rule for texting. You Skype with a goal... not to BS and talk about the weather. In my case, it was to watch her get off, to give me something to get off to. And then the next weekend she'd Greyhound up and I'd bang her stupid brains out.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 06:49 PM
2

"B-b-but, all the white men were commenting from off camera, so we didn't have good footage!" (actual argument they're using) 10 hours and 100 instances of "harassment" and all they could show is that low socio-economic groups have less tact. WOW, GOOD JOB.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 04:22 PM
2

Thank you. Reading the comments in the 2X thread of the cat-calling video was mind-numbing. Yes, it's probably annoying to have someone cat-call you once every 6 minutes, but not all of those actually constitute harassment. Harassment isn't "something I don't like". Harassment is systemic. 2 guys 2 blocks apart from each other who both say "Hi, Sweety" do not constitute a systemic verbal attack against a woman, unless those men are in collusion. Feminism has turned into "Everything I don't like …
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:50 PM
15

nagging Harassment.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 11:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter