| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | This post has been causing quite a stir on Facebook today. I've seen it shared several places and the feminists are showing their hypocrisyPretty weird preference since the foreskin has been shown to improve the experience of vaginal intercourse for women, in part by reducing friction. We homos have definitely discarded this preference: Being "uncut" is preferred with cut dicks now being seen as "passé." | /r/MensRights | 21/05/19 03:24 AM |
| 1 | Yet another way to debunk "toxic masculinity" and other anti-male termsA very well-written post that misses the point. What does the term "toxic masculinity" contain solely within itself? 2 ingredients, the noun and the adjective. The noun, as all nouns, contains no value attributes, it simply is. Masculinity is neither negative, nor positive in itself, it simply is. The adjective denotes a TYPE of masculinity. This syntax in itself already undermines one argument against the term because the use of this adjective to "separate out" a certain type of masculinity for… | /r/MensRights | 21/05/19 03:19 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter