TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Manatee7474 Archive

View 1 post and 467 comments by Manatee7474 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Manatee7474/r/MensRights27/04/12 01:04 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

SHIT!!! I knew it was going to be a slick re-hash of the original films with an unhealthy dose of feminist crap - but I still longed to be wrong... Fuck.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/15 08:07 PM
4

Good essay.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 02:46 AM
2

I personally think it comes down to this. As a man I would rather be raped than spend 20 years being dehumanized in some hell-hole of a prison; cut off from friends or family whilst fearing for my life on a daily basis, living with the very real threat of physical and/or sexual assault every hour of the day. I'm guessing that may have something to do with it.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 08:38 PM
1

I have given considerable thought to your reply as to why you would show gratitude to a person who returns your property. Personally, I would indeed thank them for their trouble, I would not however reward them for being honest, I expect that of people. Most people are honest, a sizable minority are not, I understand that. Are you right in this matter? It's impossible to determine the truth of the matter and therefore it's pointless in quibbling over.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 07:17 AM
3

Actually you would thank someone who returned your wallet for taking the time and trouble of physically giving it back to you. Would you really look them dead in the eye and say, "Thank you for not being a thief, much appreciated"?
/r/MensRights16/10/15 11:44 AM
2

The 'White feather campaign' being an example...
/r/MensRights01/09/15 08:33 AM
2

I envy you seeing it for the first time - enjoy.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/15 06:14 AM
1

The first season of Rome was good, far better than the second, but 'I, Claudius' - just watch it. For a TRPer this is it. Unabashed, unfettered by any trope or expected convention; no CGI only acting, insightful not sensitive, subtle not caricatured coupled with a profound and nuanced understanding of male and female psyche.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 09:05 PM
3

I have only two words... 'I, Claudius'. Book or BBC series, it's sublime and without equal. A realistic depiction of the nature of men and women in positions of power, GoT is childish pap in comparison!
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 05:28 PM
12

Try WORKING with a group of women.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 10:36 AM
-1

Genuinely, thanks again. No disrespect, but I believe you actually did contest the point: A woman and a man with similar training and similar amounts of muscle and fat will perform similarly. (2nd to last sentence of the last paragraph in your article's introduction - Before the section called 'Metabolism') Is that not what you meant?
/r/MensRights14/01/15 01:21 AM
0

Forgive me, I did not pose my question very precisely. What I meant was, I always thought if a man and a woman of equal(ish) weight, who both kept themselves moderately fit - same sort of time working out, that the man on average would be significantly faster and stronger again in a broad sense? You know, would they be pretty much equal in a tug-of-war/run a mile/see how far you can jump/pick-up-and-run-with-that-lump-of-iron sort of thing? What sort of activities is the woman likely to dominate…
/r/MensRights14/01/15 12:43 AM
2

Thanks for the response. Good article. Please, one more question if I may? That means if a man and woman have the same size muscles, they should have roughly the same strength. Yet you say the proportion of type 1 (Of which you say men's and women's are different) and 2 muscle fiber are significantly different. Is there no difference in maximum strength between the two types? Would a man still be able to lift heavier weights? Would he punch harder? Run faster?
/r/MensRights13/01/15 11:45 PM
-2

(in no small part because women have a greater amount of essential fat, ~12% vs. ~3%, which means ~9% lean mass difference when matched for height and weight). So are you saying for a woman to compete physically against a man she would have to be naturally 9% more massive than him (or something of the sort)?
/r/MensRights13/01/15 10:34 PM
6

Actually there IS an evil plot to 'keep men down', it's called academic/main-stream feminism.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 06:10 PM
24

In return, I wonder what is a woman's 'sacrosanct' duty towards her separated husband?
/r/MensRights02/08/14 01:42 PM
2

He was such a HUGE misogynist that the minority of his victims were female... I have read his entire manifesto and several things are very clear: He was mentally ill. He both worshiped and despised women - all he wanted to do was to love and be loved by a women. He envied and admired (alpha) men - alpha/cool men got the love and respect of women. He particularly hated couples. In short he was a misanthrope, he hated people.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 07:10 PM
2

Which ads specifically do similar things to women?
/r/MensRights23/05/14 12:43 PM
5

Go talk to the Innocence project..
/r/MensRights13/05/14 06:18 PM
25

I hear if you scratch its ear just right, it shakes its leg and crys rape!
/r/MensRights28/04/14 03:25 PM
19

I think it's when a portion of the 'hot air' produced by a feminist is fed back into their own thought process...
/r/MensRights29/03/14 11:11 PM
1

Wimbledon Ticket price for women's final (2013) £1,510 Ticket price for men's final (2013) £2,270 Duration Longest men's final by time 4hrs 48mins Longest women's final by time 2hrs 45mins Longest men's match by time 11hrs 5mins Longest women's match by time 3hrs 45mins
/r/MensRights22/01/14 09:07 PM
1

What about the fact that UFC heavyweights tend to make a lot more money than lightweights - certainly true at the top of the division?
/r/MensRights22/01/14 09:05 PM
2

Please read a FAR MORE informed and reasoned opinion.. Actually makes sense
/r/MensRights27/12/13 09:53 AM
5

So if the boys had permission to distribute the photographs it would be legal then?
/r/MensRights14/11/13 09:33 PM
1

Excellent
/r/MensRights13/10/13 08:42 PM
4

Outstanding female undergraduates
/r/MensRights06/10/13 09:03 AM
15

Wimbledon Ticket price for women's final (2013) £1,510 Ticket price for men's final (2013) £2,270 Duration Longest men's final by time 4hrs 48mins Longest women's final by time 2hrs 45mins Longest men's match by time 11hrs 5mins Longest women's match by time 3hrs 45mins
/r/MensRights03/09/13 10:25 PM
5

Bravo, sir!
/r/MensRights12/08/13 06:29 AM
4

Check again please...
/r/MensRights10/08/13 08:00 PM
1

Against Women Suffrage Because women already have the municipal vote, and are eligible for membership of most local authorities. These bodies deal with questions of housing, education, care of children, workhouses and so forth, all of which are peculiarly within a woman's sphere. Parliament, however, has to deal mainly with the administration of a vast Empire, the maintenance of the Army and Navy, and with questions of peace and war, which lie outside the legitimate sphere of woman's influence. …
/r/MensRights02/08/13 09:22 AM
1

Please forgive me. Today has been Hell, I'm ashamed to say I just didn't have the time to dig out my old notes - bear with me one more day.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 06:35 PM
1

Excellent response my friend! Tomorrow I'm going to post a few of those reasons (and their sources, of course) - and I think you're going to find them very, very interesting.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 09:09 PM
1

I am pleased that I have made a difference, truly! - still I wonder if you know exactly WHY there was ever any resistance to giving women the vote? I'm not being condescending, far from it, I believe that your analysis of the information I gave you was very reasoned and balanced, kudos to you. I accept, of course, that there were various reasons; some petty, some bigoted but still there were some very powerful and reasonable arguments as to exactly why women 'as a class' should be excluded from …
/r/MensRights31/07/13 08:42 PM
1

As promised, a variety of sources... Source White Feather 1 Source White Feather 2 Source Violence 1 Source Violence 2 Source Votes for women 1 Source Votes for women 2
/r/MensRights31/07/13 01:44 PM
1

Forgive my rudeness, I too get irritated and forget most people have been spoon fed a rather 'sanitized' history of feminism. I will post them tomorrow for you - I'm on call right now and would like to source a number of verifiable references.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 07:23 PM
2

At the time Pankhurst was actively campaigning, most men did not have the vote—only wealthy men with property did. Nearly a million British men died in the trenches of the First World War, many millions more were maimed and disfigured. The overwhelming majority of these did not have the vote, yet we no-longer seem to feel that this is relevant. Emmeline and her daughter, Christabel Pankhurst, demanded the vote not for all, not even for all women, but only for wealthy women such as themselves. Th…
/r/MensRights30/07/13 12:45 PM
2

I do believe that, at the beginning, the feminist movement was an honourable thing. It was not anti-male; Believe what you wish, but the first wave feminist movement was not particularly 'honorable' and showed a very marked tenancy to being misandric. I suggest you read something of the nascent feminist movement. Start anywhere, you may find the suffragette connection to the 'white feather' campaign interesting - but that's just the beginning, there is much for you to learn... EDIT:Removed a wor…
/r/MensRights29/07/13 11:01 AM
4

God dammit! Men were 'controlled'. Do you really think for thousands of years men had a choice in what they did? Do you think men in their untold numbers 'chose' to break their bodies in mines. battlefields and on the land during times with little or no medical services? Of course they bloody didn't! They did it because they HAD to. Opportunities? Women have been Queens, Generals, land owners and bandits. Do you think a male peasant in 17th century Russia could turn to his wife and say, "I've de…
/r/MensRights27/07/13 02:15 PM
1

Sexism. Dammit! That's the word! "I hate ALL men" = Sexism. "I hate ALL women" = Sexism. Expected direction!!! What next? "Reverse racism"! Is this a form of mind control? Are people so conditioned? (21st century Western word association) Domestic violence = Drunk MAN beating his pregnant wife after raping her. A racist = A MAN in white lynching a poor black man. A pedophile = A MAN violently raping a little girl. Sadist = MAN... Psychopath = MAN... And yet... Angel = WOMAN (Actually this one ma…
/r/MensRights26/07/13 08:24 PM
12

You utter fool! Think! For the love of God, think! In any age, on EVERY continent, in EVERY society - MEN have shielded women from hardship and harm. Why? Because son's love their mothers, fathers love their daughters, brothers love their sisters, husbands love their wives - and EVERY man has an instinct (to some degree or another) to protect women and children. Why is that simple concept so hard for people to understand? Yes, in times past when at war soldiers (men) would slaughter other men in…
/r/MensRights26/07/13 07:41 PM
18

5000 years ago women were no more oppressed than men.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 05:33 PM
3

Ok, 'reverse sexism' is called sexism.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 11:26 AM
3

If you did know anything about her, then you would probably not consider her worthy of being on a banknote. If I seem annoyed then please understand, it's not directed at you personally. Ada Lovelace is yet another 'feminist' misinformation campaign, a bloody successful one at that. My ire is at how she has been transformed from a young woman, and possibly a fairly competent mathematician, whom with Babbage's help wrote a translation and notes of a lecture given by him at the University of Turin…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:39 PM
4

You know nothing factual about Ada Lovelace.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 10:06 AM
3

History.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 07:52 PM
1

That's the spirit!
/r/MensRights22/07/13 07:34 PM
1

When you believe that not hurting someones feelings is more important than truth, when we dare not ridicule the ridiculous, when we replace banter with banalities - THEN we truly are like feminists.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 06:44 PM
0

Are you saying homosexuals are extremely offensive?
/r/MensRights22/07/13 03:21 PM
1

True, I stand corrected.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 11:52 AM
2

Questioning patriarchy is indicative of 'patriarchal privilege' and therefore constitutes irrefutable proof of systemic female oppression, a corollary of which is the confirmation of the existence of 'patriarchy'. God! Men are stupid! An academic atheist-feminist /S
/r/MensRights20/07/13 11:13 AM
7

Andrew Holding - Molecular biologist, feminist and completely wrong.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 10:37 AM
1

If men and women's tennis was all best of 9 set matches, no one would watch the sport because matches would take forever and be really boring. The sport would generate LESS money. So when you say that extending the length of the women's matches would generate more money, you are not using sound logic. Women play only 3 sets because they PHYSICALLY cannot play much beyond that. Men play longer because people want the longest match possible without killing the players, they can cope with 5 sets. Y…
/r/MensRights10/07/13 09:08 PM
1

I find your arbitrary '2:1' ratio incomprehensible. But I will try again... We are talking about a Grand Slam tennis prize, not some amateur 'fun event' 5K race. In gymnastics and figure skating you do not buy separate tickets to see either the men or women competitions. The duration IS a factor - (Can't believe I have to explain this). People actually like to watch tennis. The more tennis played, the more people like it, and the more they will pay to see it. Simple. Would people pay the same am…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 06:37 PM
1

Sorry, I'm trying to not be deliberately insulting. I looked into the facts (as far as I was able) of the matter before formulating my opinion. Men play substantially longer. Generate more revenue. = Men should receive more money. Revenue Ticket price for women's final (2013) £1,510 Ticket price for men's final (2013) £2,270 Duration Longest men's final by time 4hrs 48mins Longest women's final by time 2hrs 45mins Longest men's match by time 11hrs 5mins Longest women's match by time 3hrs 45mins …
/r/MensRights06/07/13 04:31 PM
1

Gilles Simon claims top men back him over equal pay Male players support Simon in equal pay argument, women disagree Game, set and match? Or are you going to persist with your doublethink?
/r/MensRights04/07/13 06:26 AM
1

So let me understand this; paying male tennis players more money, because they generate more revenue and entertain the crowds longer (they play more sets) is fair, wrong and sexist. Paying female tennis players the same as the male tennis players, even through they play less and generate less revenue is unfair, right but not sexist. Well that makes perfect sense /s Here I was thinking being sexist was treating people based on their sex, not on their merit.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 07:59 PM
1

Hmm... You are not being very consistent. If you go to a concert with an opening act, do you think they are paid the same amount as the headline act?
/r/MensRights03/07/13 03:50 PM
1

What if there was a significant difference in the prize pool?
/r/MensRights03/07/13 12:36 PM
7

In the UK, Girl Guides is strictly female only but Scouts (Formerly boy Scouts) accepts both boys and girls. Apparently that's equality.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 07:59 PM
6

Is being called a 'white male' an insult now? I should really try to keep up...
/r/MensRights27/06/13 08:52 PM
1

Both?
/r/MensRights27/06/13 07:55 PM
7

Under the bridge with you!!! And don't come out!!!
/r/MensRights25/06/13 03:29 PM
2

Not even close! A woman in 2010 made it into the top 5 in a race. That is it, despite women being actively encouraged to participate since the sport started, don't take my word for it See for yourself Everything from chess to big wave surfing is dominated by men.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 10:35 AM
2

Funny you should ask, I looked into this a while back. I examined shooting, archery, long distance running etc. All men by a long shot. Yet there is ONE sport I found where women do seem to have a marginal advantage over men - ultra long distance swimming! (Kinda makes a mockery of women and children first to the life rafts).
/r/MensRights12/06/13 09:36 AM
2

Tennis is not unisex, a female is no match for a male in open contest. Ref Remember women are 'deemed' not robust enough to play 5 sets, they play only 3. (Strange how so many women, from MPs to tennis players, howled for equality in prize money but for the most part remain remarkably silent on this particular 'inequality'.)
/r/MensRights12/06/13 07:20 AM
1

Feminist pap. Men and women hunted side by side, what rubbish.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 06:14 PM
7

Pity he will burn for it...
/r/MensRights26/05/13 02:42 AM
-4

Go read/listen to GWW - she's far better at explaining why you maybe 'a little mistaken/misled' by the authorized narrative of the women's movement as taught in most classrooms.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 05:49 PM
9

You have obviosly never worked in an office with a HR department...
/r/MensRights25/05/13 11:21 AM
-5

Feminism IS negativity. Feminism postulates that many/most/all problems faced by women are a result of their oppression by men - and you can't see the 'stereotyping because of gender' in that? Strange...
/r/MensRights24/05/13 08:51 AM
13

In British law a woman CANNOT be charged with rape: Rape has been redefined from the Sexual Offences Act 1956 (amended in 1976 and 1994) to read: A person (A) commits an offence if— (a) HE intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with HIS PENIS, (b) B does not consent to the penetration, and (c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents. (emphasis mine)
/r/MensRights21/05/13 02:34 AM
4

Is it really?
/r/MensRights13/05/13 08:48 AM
-3

Fake court (It's NOT a court of law) Fake Judge (She's NOT a judge) Fake bailiff (He's an actor) Fake location (It's not filmed in NY) Fake audience (At least some are extras) Fake fines (Paid by show) Fake cases (Some are semi or completely scripted) You're right, it's far from fake. /s
/r/MensRights14/04/13 06:14 PM
0

And all the costs and compensation paid by the show - it's all about ratings and nothing to do with law or justice. It's a TV show. Period.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 06:09 PM
8

He was a REAL victim of ABUSE.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 02:04 PM
4

No it's bloody well not! It's not a court. She's not a judge. The 'awards' are paid by the producers of the show. The audience is filled with paid extras. Some of the cases are scripted (or semi scripted). .. All this is detailed on the wiki page for 'Judge Judy', I have even heard that participants are sometimes coached prior to appearing 'in court'.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 02:01 PM
11

You misunderstand, kawaiigardiner asked for a list of 12 high profile feminists who aren't complete crack pots.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 04:11 PM
1

Some people will always believe in fairies...
/r/MensRights26/03/13 06:31 AM
4

Milton Friedman, Thomas Sowell - These men made me the 'libertarian' I am today.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 01:15 PM
1

In MY school everybody was pushed - hard! Back in my day everything was exam based, everything. If you could do the calculations in your head - fantastic! If you could memorise an entire set of books by passing your hand over them - fantastic! Nobody was ever held back, and we had some sickeningly smart pupils, all that was ever required is that you learn, how you did that was completely up to you. I suppose it all depends on the quality of the teachers; I went to an all male old-fashioned gramm…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:23 PM
1

I believe children should question adults, but also I believe children should obey adults. Period. Children are children, and should be treated as such. Namely with compassion, kindness and patience; but there also needs to be clear boundaries, limits and consequences for wilful disobedience. I see now, very clearly, the wisdom in the way my parents and grand parents raised their children - I didn't always, but I do now. As to your 'obedient classes. Like dogs' quip. Quite right! It's because we…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 08:20 PM
1

They sure did. Back then it catered for the top 15% of the educated elite, it was (in general), a lot more rigorous with very few non-vocational degrees. If you had a degree it really meant something. It was also completely free! You automatically had grants and bursaries so anybody could go - if you were good enough that is.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 08:00 PM
1

I agree. There's a BIG difference between a 'spanking' and physical abuse - corporal punishment has its place in school and in the home (in my opinion). In my day we had 'the cane' - used very rarely, the REALISTIC threat of it was all that was really needed. What we didn't have was Ritalin etc but strangely enough we had well disciplined, respectful classes... Just my opinion.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 12:56 PM
8

87% Of idiots believe this crap.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 11:14 PM
218

What do feminists call it? Ah, yes - Victim blaming!
/r/MensRights09/03/13 11:13 PM
1

Yeah, but by-and-large women make inferior warriors.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 12:21 PM
2

Amazons were only a myth - what next 'valkyries'?
/r/MensRights29/01/13 12:20 PM
1

UK does not have female infantry fighting units. A female may join a patrol for the purpose of searching women - combat roles? No.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:02 PM
2

'Still'?
/r/MensRights16/01/13 05:16 PM
6

Don't give a crap as long as men and women serve the same time for the same crime.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 05:13 PM
3

I wish I could. My wife LOVES those shows on the 'Crime and investigation' channel, the "true life" stuff; Murder casebook, the first 48, the real NCIS et al. Anyhow, although I really don't care for them myself; I sure that those law enforcement, lawyers and investigators spin and exaggerate their stories - though this one case did stick out in my memory. It was a case of a woman serial killer who poisoned one husband after another. As I often do (because I'm annoying and obsessive), I pointed …
/r/MensRights09/01/13 01:43 PM
7

Actually saw a US public prosecutor on TV say as much. He said if a wife goes missing or dies under mysterious circumstances then the husband is automatically aggressively pursued as a suspect, but the reverse is not the case. He said it may be sexist, but it was the truth. Generally female 'black widows' are only uncovered if they are too prolific, too inept or unlucky. Even in the case here, if a family member had not tipped off the medical examiner the murder would never have been discovered …
/r/MensRights09/01/13 10:27 AM
17

So it's not ONLY the sith that deal in absolutes...
/r/MensRights08/01/13 09:44 PM
5

well done sir.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 06:56 PM
2

I would be genuinely interested in hearing what events these were as I cannot find any where women performed better than men. EDIT: I have looked hard but I cannot find a single one - not one.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 10:11 AM
14

Nope, men throw the javelin further than women: (Top 10 men's throws) 98.48 meters Jan Železný (CZE) 93.09 meters Aki Parviainen (FIN) 92.61 meters Sergey Makarov (RUS) 92.60 meters Raymond Hecht (GER) 91.69 meters Konstadinós Gatsioúdis (GRE) 91.59 meters Andreas Thorkildsen (NOR) 91.53 meters Tero Pitkämäki (FIN) 91.46 meters Steve Backley (GBR) 91.29 meters Breaux Greer (USA) 90.73 meters Vadims Vasiļevskis (LAT) (Top 10 women's throws) 72.28 Barbora Špotáková (CZE) 71.99 Mariya Abakumova (RU…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:10 AM
1

To be fair, the inclusion of women in both the Red army and Chinese people's armies had a lot more to do with political ideology than martial effectiveness. The bottom line is any human that can lift a weapon, point it at an enemy and pull a trigger can fight - it's just that some types of people are far better suited, physically and mentally, to the rigours of combat; that would be men I'm genuinely sad to say... EDIT: Left out word.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 08:14 PM
0

Did I miss something? When did being 'anti-war' become a pejorative term? Maybe they should stop making 'Call of duty' and 'Battlefield' games; war is occasionally a 'necessary evil', the operative word being 'necessary' - not to be confused with 'convenient', 'glorious', 'humane' or 'expedient'. What people tend to hate is the abuse or misuse of power...
/r/MensRights16/12/12 07:57 PM
0

I don't get why YOU DON'T GET - be it 'drone strikes' or 'air strikes' it's all an obscene waste of life, money and time. "patriotism is the virtue of the vicious" - Oscar Wilde No I don't hate the military, they are merely a 'blind' weapon, it's those in power who wield the weapon to further their own political and personal agendas - they are the murderous scum.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 07:07 PM
1

Calling a woman who mutilated a man and then fed his flesh to the family dog a "Bitch" is 'overkill' - are you insane?
/r/MensRights16/12/12 08:00 AM
6

I suggest you actually READ the article, at least in one man's case it's not like that at all.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 07:43 AM
0

The power of Christ compels you! The power of Christ compels you!
/r/MensRights07/12/12 10:39 AM
4

Because Ma99ie clearly thinks that in some way, or in some form, the husband's to blame; a woman could NEVER be that wicked and evil unless it's under a man's influence or direction! (If she acted alone then she must be seriously mentally ill)
/r/MensRights06/12/12 03:43 PM
1

How bad was Jezebel? Not half as bad as this feminist revisionist crap.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:19 PM
1

Interesting. Thank you sir.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 08:36 PM
1

So far you have implied I'm arrogant, an asshole and a child. If you really are an adult - try acting like one! Conversation ended.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 09:32 PM
1

You are correct. I am tired. My friend, I have been 'doing this' actively for at least 17 or 18 years and was interested in this subject 20 years prior to that - before the internet, before home computers even (If you can imagine such a world) - that's a long time and I have put an insane, almost obsessive, amount of time formulating and researching various facets of the MRM and related topics. That doesn't make my opinions 'right' but it does mean I'm not entirely ignorant either. Nevertheless,…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 03:18 AM
7

"They both have low self-esteem I think, but his has got to be lower." If it isn't, give it time...
/r/MensRights23/11/12 09:58 PM
1

I had to laugh. No, I'm a middle aged, well educated family man - edgy high school kid indeed! For many years, and on many sites, I used to put in real effort into tracking down articles, statistics and facts to validate my arguments but lately... well I suppose I'm just tired of saying the same thing over and over again. Out of curiosity, are you young?
/r/MensRights23/11/12 05:30 AM
1

I'll be blunt. There is a great deal of hard science showing that male and female brain structures are significantly, through not radically, different. There is also huge amounts of data regarding the significant role hormones play in human behavior. It would be a very long and arduous task in finding any references you would find acceptable and I am really too lazy to even try. I really don't think you're interested - you've made up your mind that aside from a few obvious physical differences m…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:21 PM
1

Start here You have to pay for the full paper EDIT:Formatting
/r/MensRights22/11/12 02:29 PM
1

They are NOT superficial differences.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 12:43 PM
3

IQ tests are normalised for sex - just saying, not implying anything, it's just a fact.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 09:27 PM
13

So men can give birth? Women, on average, have less muscle mass but are equally as strong? Different brain structures have absolutely no effect on cognitive ability? Differing relative amounts of hormones have no effect on personality? Orwellian double think - "The sexes are different but the same!" EDIT: Replaced 'genders' with 'sexes'.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 07:29 PM
50

My reply to all that - Fuck off and die alone. Do you understand?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 01:39 PM
8

Red pill tastes a little bitter, don't it...
/r/MensRights18/11/12 07:25 PM
2

Are you from Sweden?
/r/MensRights15/11/12 01:11 PM
1

I never thought I'd see that in my life time - my sincerest gratitude to the producers of the One Show.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 07:44 PM
16

Want to learn about Chinese history? Then study CHINESE HISTORY!!! Want to learn about humans and society? Then study ANTHROPOLOGY!!! Want to feel sorry for other people? Then read a NEWSPAPER!!! Want to believe utter crap? Join the fucking scientologists!!! EDIT:Formatting
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:32 PM
6

Well then, it's time for the one creature hyenas fear the most to step into play - the male lion!
/r/MensRights09/11/12 04:56 PM
13

Scrap ALL feminist studies departments and courses.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 04:50 PM
4

Whatever feminists want it to mean.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 03:39 PM
3

For the most part, yes.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 03:34 PM
5

Actually the word Helen Eadie should have used was imply, not infer...
/r/MensRights09/11/12 02:49 PM
22

No, there was a war waged by feminists and politicians against men - sadly most men don't even realize they were at war, let alone that they lost it...
/r/MensRights08/11/12 04:51 PM
2

For God's sake!! Don't you get it yet? It is NOT obvious to most that women are just as capable of violence as men. I'm sure that many who read that story will just believe she was sick/abused because NO WOMAN would EVER harm a child/animal unless she was mentally ill or provoked by a man because it's just not in a woman's nature...
/r/MensRights02/11/12 07:38 AM
10

As far as I understand it, a man who follows the MGTOW path still has healthy, fun friendships with as many men and women as they wish, it's just they don't get hitched, have children, killing themselves working for 'state and mate'.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 11:57 AM
0

First world contemporary feminism is largely a socially acceptable manifestation of the natural insecurities and fears of women regarding men.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 01:25 PM
-2

Quite true sir, as we all know the colour 'Pink' is the universally accepted mark of quality assurance - "Why think? Go pink!"
/r/MensRights27/10/12 10:10 AM
0

Only ONE YEAR? Try it from cradle to grave - then tell me about it.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 09:04 AM
-17

'Feminism' is a term used to make the knife look pretty and caring as they slide it, oh so gently, into the backs of men.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 08:58 AM
2

My friend, you're getting bipolar and 'batshit crazy' mixed up, I am sorry you had a terrible experience but I hope you learned a lot. Remember, it could have been much worse, imagine having a baby with her? (shudder)
/r/MensRights26/10/12 03:01 PM
1

Yes, because it's f**king insulting it even made it as a 'news' story! Almost no marriages last because women keep ending them! You say that this is a 'feel-good' story? WTF? This supposedly educated, intelligent, successful woman NEEDED 'psychotherapists and authors' to point out to her that the basis of a successful relationship is - be nice to your partner!? I wonder what other 'secrets' she may learn? Maybe never try to roller-skate down a flight of stairs or running wildly into traffic dras…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 08:32 PM
3

I agree with your sentiment, if my post seemed a little 'harsh' then forgive me I'm having a shitty day. Yet I do think that it's important that there's a place on the net where we can rant, even about trivial stuff. It allows people to see that it's not just you, that it's okay to be annoyed and offended. That in many cases it's not only okay but it's right you should be annoyed and offended. We NEED people to get riled up, we NEED anger and outrage - because this emotion, this 'fire' is the en…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 03:12 PM
8

Everyone should change because your friend doesn't approve of us? I don't care.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:07 PM
5

...and stupid.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:52 PM
7

(Bill Burr on being a mother/housewife) "Any job you can do in your pyjamas is not a difficult job..." Priceless.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:47 PM
3

If she truly believes she owes any part of her achievement in being made a Supreme Court Justice to the fact that she has a vagina, then she should have had the integrity and moral courage to refuse the position in the first place. To do any less would demonstrate a distinct lack of personal quality requisite for the job.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:42 PM
2

They didn't suggest castrating paedophiles with a rusty razor blade and letting them bleed to death - a view that has much traction in certain parts of my office.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:10 PM
6

My 'problem' with your two problems is that I agree 100% with everything you said.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:08 PM
8

WRONG!!!! As far as I can tell women's prisons are nowhere near as overcrowded as men's: The 10 most overcrowded prisons in England and Wales, April 2012:220 CNA =Certified Normal Accommodation In use CNA/Capacity/Population/%Overcrowded Shrewsbury 170/340/335/197% Kennet 175/342 338 193% Swansea 240/445/440/183% Usk 153/266/257/168% Wandsworth 730/1,284/1,217/167% Dorchester 148/271/241/163% Preston 455/842/742/163% Exeter 317/561/506/160% Northallerton 146/252/233/160% Canterbury 195/314/300/1…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 02:26 PM
17

Wow, you have NO idea. Let me educate you to the FACTS surrounding women in UK prisons: Most women shouldn't be in prison, because most women in prison have committed non-violent offences and pose no threat to society. FACT:The second myth is that most women are in prison for petty or non-violent offences in fact 22% of female prisoners are in custody for up to 12 months, which covers all cases heard in magistrates courts and some cases heard in Crown courts. All other female offenders are servi…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 01:07 PM
1

You see it's not quite as simple as that IMO. There are physical differences; strength/muscle mass/bone density/body chemistry/physical size etc. There are differences in brain structure, size and chemistry. There are differences in what I call drives and perspective, think maternal instinct or male competitive nature etc. I think that females, in general, are quite different from males. There are 'tough' females out there but compared to 'tough' males - they ain't so tough... Though it seems th…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 12:27 PM
3

No, I think, with the exception of 'Virtual Sex Offender Eliminators' - a monster that hunts monsters (despicable), they do seem fairly tempered; stop locking up people for marijuana possession/use and use the prison space for the very WORST sex offenders, another bemoans the fact that abusers were often abused - a victim/perpetrator cycle. Of course there are only six comments at the moment, perhaps the tone will change in time...
/r/MensRights23/10/12 12:03 PM
1

Because a headline of, "Boy of 15 may have touched the bottoms of up to 15 women in a crowd - 4 police women heroically arrested him armed only with tasers, mace and sidearms" does not make much of a headline, I 'm not saying that's what happened merely what may have happened.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 05:26 AM
13

She's a teacher? What in? Where? Arkham asylum? Is 'Advanced Psychosis' an academic subject now? How the hell did she get a job teaching? Seriously. I ask you, would ANY responsible mother or father want her teaching their son????
/r/MensRights22/10/12 12:21 PM
24

Yes.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 07:36 PM
6

IF it is true then the TRUTH must always be spoken regardless of how distasteful it appears, in this case I don't know if it is or not - but it's a notion worth investigating if only to disprove it to others who may think it. I suspect, but don't know for certain, that most reported rape cases are of the 'date rape' kind which would probably transcend cultural factors. Never-the-less there have been several high profile rape/abuse cases recently in the UK media involving groups of Asian men Read…
/r/MensRights20/10/12 09:53 PM
3

Write down everything you remember RIGHT NOW. Include everything, every detail from what you ate at breakfast, who was present, their relationship to you, where they were sitting, what was said, every detail of her appearance, everything. Where you are not sure of a detail make it clear that are not sure, but everything in writing. Included your opinion at the end separate from your observation and explain what you think and why. Do NOT talk about what happened to ANYONE until you have done this…
/r/MensRights20/10/12 09:18 PM
2

Bingo - pretty much what science says.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 03:06 PM
0

I hate when this myth comes up, 'women can tolerate more pain than men'. The truth is they can during child birth because the body releases massive amounts of endorphins, otherwise not. Don't believe me? http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=51160 http://blog.chron.com/sciguy/2012/01/women-or-men-who-has-a-higher-pain-tolerance/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pain_tolerance I dare you to say, 'women are better at multitasking than men'. Hint (also not true) EDIT:Grammar
/r/MensRights20/10/12 10:08 AM
9

So in the third world, circumcisions of males is not routinely performed without 'clean tools' and doctors? Well apart from Africa, Xhosa, Polynesia Australia, Yemen, South Korea and the Philippines your argument holds true. EDIT:Formating
/r/MensRights20/10/12 09:46 AM
0

In this particular instance she dressed as 'Black Cat' - a sexual object.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 09:29 AM
12

Fantastic! But Phillip Davies still could not get them to explicitly state that men are sentenced for longer than women - but boy did he try! Kudos to him! (At least they didn't resort to shaming language) I do remembering reading the initial 1997 report they were referring to in their debate. What it said was, defendants before the courts were either perceived as "troubled" or "troublesome". I remembering it said, magistrates (the report did not look at Crown Courts) often became "jaded" with a…
/r/MensRights20/10/12 06:59 AM
0

What a silly thing to say. Women CAN dress modestly AND be attractive! Think of all the women of stage and screen prior to today, many oozed sexuality, were astoundingly beautiful yet didn't totter around in a dress smaller than a handkerchief.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 01:10 AM
4

No, feminists/certain people are using the perceived/actual past oppression of women to justify their misandric/hateful actions and views.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:49 PM
1

Sorry but I do take issue with some of what you're saying. Looking after children CAN be tough, how tough depends on how much you're willing to do and your personal circumstances. If carrying a child hurts your back and arms then put the child down or use a papoose/child carrier. So wives and girlfriends cook and clean, many of the men at my office sacrifice countless weekends and holidays doing DIY. This is not a war or competition, these wives and girlfriends are cooking for the family, themse…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 12:39 PM
6

But not all women are proponents of women's rights. But many men are - to the point of absurdity.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:15 PM
1

Instant fan - up vote.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 01:01 PM
0

So this was the patriarchal oppression the feminists bleat endlessly on about - he pretty much nailed it first time.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:29 PM
1

Sadly my friend, over the last few years, I have found the quality of IT graduates to have significantly deteriorated, I'm not saying there aren't good ones it's just most are lacking - I'm talking dumb with a capital 'D'! I personally put this down to the fact that years ago only the very best (10% or so) of students went to university (they all had full grants from the state so money was never a problem, uni was open to poor or rich you only needed talent) and those that went into IT did so be…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 06:05 PM
1

Agreed sir, I am with you on the notion you can have intellectual diversity without necessarily having sexual/gender/religious diversity. But as to technical/intellectual stagnation I do have highly effective tool to combat this - (rubs hands and cackles manically) Pride and competition! Forgive me for saying this but these are astounding motivators of males. You want the impossible done? Challenge the team, tell them it's impossible - and watch them move heaven and Earth to prove you wrong. Giv…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 04:39 PM
1

Sorry but you still don't get what I mean, diversity has little to do with mathematical/logical skill - you need talented people who work well together, if that means a team who have the same values, share the same outlook and understand one another and are really good at what they do - fantastic!! I can see your point when it comes to marketing or design but pure number crunching/logic based STEM fields - it's of little benefit. Diversity is a boon in some fields and irrelevant in others. Pleas…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 03:16 PM
0

Of course here it is, look under the section called 'Gender and divorce'.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 02:53 PM
3

Marriage used to be a contract between a man and a woman, now it has become a governmental tool of social manipulation, a method to protect women and control men. "What God has joined together let no man put asunder." - (Evidence is given that among college-educated couples, the percentages of divorces initiated by women is approximately 90%.)
/r/MensRights15/10/12 12:55 PM
2

I really don't understand any of this nonsense. Imagine if I leave my car in a dark street with the keys in the ignition with the doors open over night in a 'bad' part of town. I come back in the morning and it's gone, it's been stolen. I go to my insurance company and try to claim, they would laugh in my face if I told them what I'd done - there's no way they would give me a penny. Are they 'theft apologists' because they believe that I bear some responsibility for what happened? The 'Rape apol…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:18 AM
1

That's management and is a different skill set from being a tech (STEM).
/r/MensRights15/10/12 05:19 AM
2

True, even being the diverse group we are, we have collected together under the banner of the 'MRM' to fight against injustice against males typified by the attitudes of people like 'DoesntReplyToMRAs'. Call it feminism, insanity or ignorance it all amounts to the same thing - a violation of our rights, men's rights... human rights. And I believe that one of the central tenants all branches of academically accepted feminism is the concept of patriarchy.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 09:34 PM
1

Nope. Read Me
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:40 PM
6

Try starting with Warren Farrell's The Myth of Male Power and Christina Hoff-Sommers' The War Against Boys: How Misguided Feminism is Harming Our Young Men Both have very solid academic credentials and well worth investigating their work.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:37 PM
1

Stronger is correct.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 02:37 PM
3

I'm in a STEM field and I think that more should be done to encourage intelligent, capable PEOPLE into the field. The number of short, tall, thin, fat, male or female is irrelevant - powerful minds are what's needed. This 'sex counting' is ridiculous! Young boys and girls who possess the requisite abilities and aptitude should be encouraged and supported every step of the way to become techs and scientists - if that's what they want!! What the STEM field needs is TALENT not QUOTAS!! EDIT:Added l…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 02:34 PM
14

As to two lesbians, the one with the shortest hair?
/r/MensRights14/10/12 02:17 PM
17

The least photogenic one?
/r/MensRights14/10/12 02:16 PM
10

There's nothing like an open mind - and oh boy, this Michael Laxer has nothing like an open mind! As a critique of the men's rights movement it's painfully awful, but if read as comedy it's gut-bustingly hilarious. You have gems like: In the case of men, [the] systemic injustice simply does not exist. Anywhere. CAFE also minimizes women's inequality generally. They make claims about the rise of women in universities and professions, but ignore the reality that women still make, as full-time work…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 01:11 PM
9

Having different points of view (perhaps due to gender or ethnicity) are a positive for any organization or profession. I respectfully disagree, at least in part, with that claim. In many purely technical or scientific endeavours sex, hair colour, height, race, religion or sexual preference are wholly irrelevant. Allow me to explain. I am a DBA and have been for twenty years, I design, develop and maintain databases. The very foundations of database design is grounded in first-order logic whilst…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 10:04 AM
54

young men in the western world today have been "brain washed" Nope. You see you need a brain in the first instance to be 'washed'. These people have probably been brought up on a steady diet of sitcoms, movies and tabloids since the day they were born. They ape the behaviour that they see on TV because that's what they believe is acceptable even expected. In 'TV land' if a man forgets his girlfriend's/wife's birthday/anniversary/acts like a 'pig' then a slap across the face is perfectly acceptab…
/r/MensRights13/10/12 06:47 PM
2

No, I should have thought more deeply about it - thank you kindly anyway.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 06:19 PM
4

Typhons right. Think of it like an unprovoked physical assault, it happened to a buddy of mine years back. He was walking home from the pub one Saturday night and a couple of drunk squaddies jumped him and gave him a beating, he said he never knew them and they never said anything, apparently they just laughed. He was sore and had a black eye and aside from a few "The fuckers!" remarks the next few days he just shrugged it off, he said he was in the wrong place at the wrong time - made no differ…
/r/MensRights13/10/12 06:16 PM
2

Predator. Blain Cooper (Jesse Ventura) says it when he encounters an entrenched enemy position atop of a small cliff followed by the classic: Poncho: You're hit. You're bleeding, man. Blain: I ain't got time to bleed. Poncho: Oh... okay. [firing a few rounds from his grenade launcher] You got time to duck? Ah Predator - A classic old school action movie.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 05:53 PM
1

There is one part to UK rape law that puzzles me. The Home Office always claimed that the reason that women should not be included as potential rapists, and the reason it generally carries a heavier penalty, was because a female victim was exposed to the risk of pregnancy. Now, if the definition has been expanded to include oral and anal penetration which carries no risk of pregnancy, why can't a male be raped by another male? It would seem to me that the changes in the definition would only ser…
/r/MensRights13/10/12 04:24 PM
8

Perhaps, but I'm guessing they're 'dug in tighter than an Alabama tick'. (A point for the movie reference without googling)
/r/MensRights13/10/12 01:58 PM
2

Very noble my friend, but just by very careful - universities tend to be very hostile to anything regarding gender or sex, I'm not suggesting not doing it but I am advocating caution. The world sorely needs educated men not martyrs.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 01:05 PM
18

True, but whom do you think this small but powerful group of 'dishonest feminists' choose to recruit and promote within the industry?
/r/MensRights13/10/12 12:56 PM
5

To my deepest shame, God/Dawkin forgive me, for the majority of my life that's exactly what I thought.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 12:06 PM
1

a slight exaggeration?
/r/MensRights13/10/12 11:32 AM
13

Rape (1) A person (A) commits an offence if— (a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis, (b) B does not consent to the penetration, and (c) A does not reasonably believe that B consent Just in case anyone missed it, rape in UK law is sexed "he intentionally..", females cannot rape though they can be prosecuted for serious sexual assault.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 11:21 AM
99

"As a platform, it provides a gathering place for men who like looking at sexualized photos of underaged teenagers, and believe that "Men's Rights" are the foremost problem facing America today." [Verbatim from article] Remember this well ladies and gentlemen, as this is exactly how much of the mainstream media sees us. They see us as frustrated, petty, spiteful men, angry and jealous that strong, fabulous women are now free from the oppression of male misogyny, free to create a better world for…
/r/MensRights13/10/12 11:09 AM
1

This is not 'affermative action' this is simple propaganda.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 09:49 AM
2

If you find that 'interesting' I suggest that you look into the FACTS surrounding Amelia Earhart, I won't spoil the surprise but I can assure you it is well worth the time.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 09:42 AM
2

Today, Given their respective ages when they began their friendship, Babbage was in his fourties and Ada Lovelace was just 17, he would probably be accused of grooming and put on a sex offender list.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 08:10 AM
15

Because the driver is refusing to prosecute. "When first interviewed by cops, Hughes [Driver] said he was willing to prosecute Lane [Female]. But a week after the incident, he called a police detective to report that he "did not wish to pursue prosecution of the female suspect." He subsequently signed a "Refuse to Prosecute Form." Read more: http://globalgrind.com/news/cleveland-bus-driver-punches-passanger-video-names-identified-artis-hughes-shidea-lane-photos#ixzz29AFYkz2m" EDIT:Spelling
/r/MensRights13/10/12 08:07 AM
3

Controversy over extent of contributions Though Ada Lovelace is often referred to as the first computer programmer, there is disagreement over the extent of her contributions, and whether she deserves to have been called a programmer. Allan G. Bromley, in the 1990 essay "Difference and Analytical Engines", wrote, "All but one of the programs cited in her notes had been prepared by Babbage from three to seven years earlier. The exception was prepared by Babbage for her, although she did detect a …
/r/MensRights13/10/12 07:34 AM
7

That would be profiling and nobody would ever do that, would they?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 06:58 AM
1

I have noticed one thing from history. When a people are viewed by the majority as less than human - that is the point when true horror starts.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 09:43 PM
1

I'm a well educated, middle class, middle-aged office drone in suburbia; the closest I've come to combat is playing Battlefield on my PC. I speak one language and have 23 days holiday a year, which I spend with my beloved dog (and the wife tags along too lol). The chances of me actually sitting in a tent breaking bread with a veteran Taliban fighter are slim to comical. So whilst I will always condemn blatant acts of seemingly mindless brutality I cannot, and have no right to, condemn any single…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 09:37 PM
2

Thanks Idiopathic77. Truly. I think that I would like a deeper understanding, no disrespect to Kahed, but it would require the lifetime experience of a native to really understand the Taliban. Would someone who spent a few years of his young life in my country, who visited, who had friends here - would they really understand the subtle nuances of my culture? Probably they may have an idea to a certain degree but they would/could never be a 'native' in the deepest sense of the word. What I really…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:45 PM
3

But Kahed only spent a few of his early years in Afghanistan before moving away when he was eleven and that was before the rise of the Taliban. No, what I want is to know how they live, what they do and why they do it. As far as most people in the west are concerned they are a group of men who don't wash, carry AK47s and stone women for fun. I suspect there is a lot more to them than that, the world is not a Hollywood movie, it's not as simple as the 'bad guys' carry AK47s and the 'good guys' ca…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:26 PM
-3

I am very uneasy with that statement. I know little about the Taliban, and what little I do know comes from western media who almost 'foam at the mouth' at the very mention of their name. Their crimes, as far as I can tell, are that they are extremely patriarchal and rigidly religious. Their propensity for violence in a brutal and hostile environment is understandable if not excusable – I have absolutely no clue as to what life is like for them. Being in the MRM I know how persistently inaccurat…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:16 PM
36

I do NOT support the education of girls and women. I do support the education of girls, boys, men and women. I do NOT condemn the Taliban. I do condemn any HUMAN who murders or terrorises unarmed civilians whether they call themselves the Taliban, US forces, Marxists, UK forces, Shiite, Sunnis or the scouting association of Australia! EDIT:Formatting
/r/MensRights11/10/12 09:05 AM
2

Lol
/r/MensRights10/10/12 06:59 PM
3

I did find your comment irritating in that you seem to be making excuses for the immature and offensive opinion of a woman who is so devoid of compassion, understanding or sense that she feels misandry is acceptable purely because of her own shortcomings. So maybe 'boring and dumb' was a poor choice of words. EDIT: Missed a word.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:46 PM
6

I have often pondered the question, "What do women want?" I think I've found the answer - Whatever they don't have. Women jealously protect their own 'women only' organizations and spaces so I say draw a line before the Freemason Hall and say, "This far and NO further!!!"
/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:38 PM
5

No she's only interested in it BECAUSE she cannot join it!!!
/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:35 PM
20

The clue to (one of the many) problems with feminism is in the name - feminism. It attempts to see things only from the 'female' perspective, but without a counterbalancing 'male' perspective it's like looking at the world with a hand over one eye - you loose depth and perspective. A balanced perspective produces wisdom and understanding, feminism (in isolation) promotes only unbalanced ignorance. If feminism was synonymous with 'gender egalitarianism' there would be no feminism there would only…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:32 PM
-1

Your comment was boring and dumb...
/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:14 PM
3

Refreshing honesty.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:09 PM
0

I think the entire definition of rape is wrong; to my mind, unless one party is unconscious, rape should be where one party made explicitly clear they don't want sex and the other continued regardless.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 10:07 AM
2

There are more people who agree that men should have basic human rights than you think. One of the saddest and funniest things I've heard in my life...
/r/MensRights10/10/12 10:02 AM
5

I don't believe the premium tariff for males was ever anything more than a devious method of maximising profit, I'm sure gender politics never was a factor. They merely exploited percieved prevailing gender sterotypes to their own advatage, I'm certain that they always knew it was appallingly unfair.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 07:52 AM
1

I disagree. To reduce false accusations of rape do the following: Repeal the 'Rape shield laws’; if a woman has cried rape before, that fact should be presented to the jury. I think you should only be convicted of rape where there is substantive and compelling physical evidence, how can 'he said, she said' evidence ever be the foundation for anything more than 'reasonable doubt'? Yes, some rapists will undoubtedly 'get away' with their crimes but as English jurist William Blackstone would say, "…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 08:09 PM
2

None of the small handful of transvestites I have known or met ever expressed any desire to be 'perused' by straight men - two of them had long term girlfriends.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 12:26 PM
0

There isn't a 'war on boys' - it's a massacre.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:48 AM
9

So the 'night' originally belonged to a group of ignorant, self-deluded, hate mongering harpies? I suppose they have a point only wanting to venture out after dark.... EDIT:Grammar
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:53 AM
26

Except that Augusta Golf Club has bowed to feminist pressure and now accepts women members.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:47 AM
6

Can't say for any other country but here in the UK, far and away the biggest employer of females is the government, public sector workers, so of course any recession will hit men first, harder and for longer - Daddy government protects itself. Government can’t afford the payroll? No problem the government just prints more money and borrows a billion pounds here and there – no need to worry about repayments. Private company can’t afford the payroll? Bank forecloses and everyone’s out on the stree…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 07:54 PM
2

Those accused of rape, unless there are truly exceptional circumstances (as decided by a independent panel), should have their identity protected until they have been convicted. If he genuinely did not rape her, not just that there was not enough evidence to convict him, then at very best she is mistaken in her belief and at very worst a liar for accusing him. The police should apply the same zeal that they use to peruse rapists to peruse false rape accusations where applicable and the punishmen…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 07:30 PM
40

Men have just given up; they have been told from the moment they are born that women can do it better (and in heels) so why bother? If women are so fucking amazing at everything then let them do everything. To be be born with a penis means you are automatically branded a workshy, sex obsessed slob - and if you take everything from men then why on earth would you expect anything back in return except apathy and resentment? It was his generation that mass produced the blue pill, now he stands as t…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 06:57 PM
1

"Opinions are like assholes. Everybody's got one and everyone thinks everyone else's stinks." - A smartass.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:28 PM
2

That's like critiquing a film by studying the cast and crew and listening to others opinion of it, perhaps you may come close to the truth but it is truly no substitute to watching it yourself.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:24 PM
-1

You can have a view, it's just an uninformed view.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:57 PM
1

Totally agree with you but I think damnfooldamn has much to learn or is being deliberately obtuse.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 11:19 PM
1

I can honestly say I have not seen or heard it myself in many, many years. Banter amongst friends, yes but not like it makes out in the article.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 10:17 PM
-3

Is it really that common?
/r/MensRights06/10/12 09:52 PM
1

The horror genre tends to be mostly dominated by male directors, despite the focus on female characters. Point 1, 'Dark Romance' aside (Twilight et al), men seem to like the Horror genre more than women so most (not all) true horror literature and film is created by men - it's what they like. Point 2, most horror will have a prominent female protagonist menaced by said 'horror' as it produces the greatest suspense - oh no! Pretty girl is about to be sliced and diced/eaten/molested! Humans react …
/r/MensRights06/10/12 09:46 PM
6

At least James Bond had a job.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 07:31 PM
6

Check out the threading on that!!! Shake your seams baby!!!
/r/MensRights06/10/12 04:27 PM
2

Yeah but the thing is Twilight is aimed specifically at the 'moronic teen female' audience (also managed to capture a surprising number of moronic adult females) and low budget horror is often (not always) aimed at the 'moronic teen male' audience. It IS sexist, but that's not particularly a bad thing, personally 'female fantasy' bores and annoys me in equal measure - I used to love films like 'The Evil dead'!
/r/MensRights06/10/12 04:23 PM
3

...he said as he adjusted his armour and rode off into the sunset.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 04:11 PM
6

Because people believe what they want to believe and what people want to believe is what people are taught to believe.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 04:03 PM
3

Why should it be surprising? A female film critic seems not to like the horror fantasy stories of some male film makers (unless it has a strong female lead or was female centric - the two segments she liked). Wow I'm shocked!
/r/MensRights06/10/12 03:28 PM
1

Personally, as we don't have children, my SO can do whatever she pleases as long as she pulls her weight; housework or paid work as long as she does work. If we had children then either she or I would raise the children whilst the other brought home as much money as possible.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:21 PM
2

In the UK it is illegal. Think of it this way, what if they charged blacks 2x the price of what they charged whites, would that just be 'a cool thing for whites'? Would you tell blacks they are 'just whining' when they point out how unfair it is? EDIT: Spelling
/r/MensRights04/10/12 02:38 PM
3

Nor is pointing to the facts and being reasonable. The fact is that it is well known that the 'wage gap' as an example of sexist oppression is wrong - period. Yet despite this politicians STILL use this lie and many people, particularly women, believe it for example. Those that 'follow their hearts' are unlikely to persuaded by facts.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 11:58 AM
2

Read the article.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 02:53 PM
2

Look 5ft11flip, think of it this way, if your father matched a woman against a man and she got seriously hurt what are people outside of either your dojo or this site likely to say? "What was she doing fighting a guy in the first place!" Maybe they wouldn't but that's what your father thinks. Now imagine how your dad would feel if she died, he would feel devistated if a guy died - how much worse if a female died? I know she took the risk but to his mind - he allowed it therefore he's responsible…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 11:21 PM
2

Hmm. That's a silly thing to say. A woman CAN be stronger than a man but men, in general, are physically stronger than women, in general. The strongest man in the world will be vastly stronger than the strongest woman in the world. Women may not shatter easily but it takes more to shatter a man.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 10:48 PM
1

The average adult male is SIGNIFICANTLY stronger than the average adult female. Men typically have about 20 percent to 40 percent more muscle mass than women. Male skeletal muscles are generally faster and have higher maximum power output than female muscles. Males, on average, have denser, stronger bones, tendons, and ligaments. Male human (adults) are, pound for pound, physically more powerful than a female. Male humans have a reflexive instinct to protect females Males are taught never to hit…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 11:00 AM
5

Don't be too sure, I once thought 'birth rape' was satire... After doing a little research I found out I was wrong, it was farce. literally.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:26 AM
13

What's Poe's law? Are you trying to confuse me? 'Probing' my vulnerable and fragile female argument with your 'hard-to-understand' man words, without my prior notarised written consent, constitutes knowledge rape you misogynistic oppressor!
/r/MensRights29/09/12 05:42 AM
27

Implying that there was no such thing as Patriarchy is oppressive to woman, actually it's what we feminists call 'Belief rape' - the use of facts or logic to discredit what we feel to be true.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:57 AM
5

Tell me honestly azoq, is it in the 'public interest' to prosocute him? The CPS should have kicked this case out before it had started, had it been a woman I'm certain it would have been treated very differently.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:29 AM
6

So is it okay to say something like, "I'm positive she's got great tits?" EDIT: Forgot to add /s
/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:01 AM
2

Hopefully dounuts and coffee!!
/r/MensRights29/09/12 02:54 AM
10

May I ask why you think 'on average women are better with communication'? Are they better orators than men? It's just that all the greatest orators I know of have all been men: Winston Churchill, martin luther king, Gandhi et al Are they better writers than men? Not really, I would still say the greatest writers in history are mostly men, there are many good female writers but none compare to giants like Leo Tolstoy, William Shakespeare and Anton Chekhov . Are women better at picking up on nonve…
/r/MensRights29/09/12 02:45 AM
1

I just clicked on /r/spacedicks for the first time. I wanted to check it out so I spent a few minutes looking it over and followed a link or two... I am actually shaking, I feel sick, it was horrible. Please be warned.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 01:41 PM
0

Genitalia aside, anyone can do the aforementioned with discipline, drive, ambition and knowledge. The answer is no, no they can't. That's the whole point - you can't make genius, only nurture it. At genius levels and higher, men massively dominate - higher the IQ, the fewer the women, it's a physiological thing, therefore men will always massively dominate in the advancement of the sciences. We are not all equal, the sooner people accept this the sooner we can put society back on track.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 08:00 PM
1

Yet, if all these achievements were attained by males, then to say ‘these are the accomplishments of men’ is indeed correct. I don't believe he was taking personal credit for those discoveries. As to its significance, well either women were so oppressed in the past that they accomplished little compared to men (The current theory) or there is something almost unique about that rare breed of men, a quality that drives them to explore and create, this coupled with astounding mental capacities. Pro…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 10:51 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 11:41 AM
5

Generalisations are only unhelpful if they are not true. That women lack sympathy for men is merely truth; it's neither good nor bad but certainly not contrived, it's a legacy of an earlier more brutal time, a necessity for survival. Your comment makes clear your ignorance of the quintessential nature of males and females. EDIT:Grammar.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 10:31 PM
1

No reputable company would ever explicitly treat a woman in the same manner.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 08:39 PM
5

Two points: It has already 'gone too far'. You cannot stop it.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 08:35 PM
8

Women, in general, have little or no sympathy for men in general.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 08:30 PM
6

I loath the word 'creep' - emotive without clear definition.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 08:24 PM
2

You.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 03:43 AM
2

These links may prove VERY enlightening regarding Naomi's new book. A review by neurocritic. (Search on the word Naomi to find the right section.) A review by a neuroscientist written for the New Statesman Found here And for balance (of sorts) the case in defense of the book made by the scientist who advised Naomi. Read this EDIT:Formatting.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 01:53 AM
8

Yep! Hey, this one's got your name tag on it!
/r/MensRights20/09/12 01:16 AM
3

I hope so
/r/MensRights19/09/12 08:46 PM
14

If you think trolling is more common here than in other subreddits... You might be right.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:32 PM
5

Take heart all who live in the UK!!! Rejoice with a glad heart!!! We are returning to O-levels albeit under a new name Baccalaureate! I'm old enough to remember why O-level exams were scrapped in the first place - a single hard exam at the end of years of study with an emphasis on spelling and grammar. Guess who used to do really well in these sorts of exams? I'm not saying that under the current totally feminised educational environment it will tip the playing field in favour of boys, but it ma…
/r/MensRights17/09/12 07:05 PM
1

Special rendition. Prolific abortion. Invasion of Iraq. Male genital mutilation. Perpetual servitude through draconian alimony and child support. Torture. Detention without trial. Execution of males by either strapping them to a chair and frying their brains or injecting poison in their veins as they watch - females and the rich are of course exempt. Invasion of Afghanistan. Use of chemical weapons. Use of atomic weapons. Use of economic sanctions as a weapon. Mass destruction of the environment…
/r/MensRights17/09/12 06:46 PM
5

Really, and please tell me what I stated above that isn't common in the muslim world? What are we talking about, the ACTUAL muslim[sic] world or your paranoid fantasy?
/r/MensRights17/09/12 11:03 AM
17

You have the privilege of dying earlier than, and paying for, your womb carrying superiors - you lucky, lucky bastard!!!
/r/MensRights17/09/12 09:59 AM
-4

Obviously not.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 01:08 AM
-4

Do ANY women understand parody or satire?
/r/MensRights14/09/12 09:15 PM
1

Yes, the article said that was true but you do both tasks worse - the more tasks you add, the worse you do them. It also said there was no noticable difference between men and women when doing this.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 08:50 PM
1

I have it. Issue dated 7th April 2007, (Title) How many things can you do at once? - Our flawed talent for multitasking (Pages 28 -32).
/r/MensRights14/09/12 07:16 PM
1

Wait a few hours, I'm at work and I have the mag at home.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 06:14 AM
0

You're an idiot, men are superior to women - at being men.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 08:09 PM
27

New Scientist did a big feature on this (I could dig out this issue reference if anyone's interested), it turns out it is physically IMPOSSIBLE to multitask anything that requires concentration. Women multitasking - myth. End of. Interesting thought is, why do so many women sincerly believe it's true.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 08:04 PM
2

An argument can have both factual basis, and appeal to emotion - there is no need to choose between the two. Nuff said.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 07:21 PM
0

Women need men to survive, men need women to thrive. I despise this feminist re-writing of history; "In pre-history mankind lived happily in a feminist commune singing happy tunes and worshiping vaginas, we have no proof cos we were all too happy n' stuff, but it's definitely true". - Absolute fucking bullshit!!! Men DID give women modern society, men's curiosity, ingenuity and obsessive natures gave us science and technology - women played a critical role in our continued survival but survival …
/r/MensRights12/09/12 10:21 AM
0

Wow, you don't have a clue. Having a vagina is the 'Ultimate-armour-of-fucking-God'! In your 'uncivilized world' YOU don't need to be physically tough! No, in case of danger all you have to do is scream, then your father, your brother, your son, your husband, your neighbour, your boyfriend, a policeman, a solider in fact any male within earshot will jump to your rescue; dying if necessary to protect you. It was called the patriarchal system - you would call it oppression I suppose (Well until su…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:03 PM
2

Can you think of any good reasons why the majority of homless men don't have children with them?
/r/MensRights11/09/12 03:46 PM
10

Screw that! I have, for the last decade, had the message that, "Women are every bit as tough as men!" rammed down my bloody throat. If women are hard enough to be soilders/fire-fighters/rangers then they are hard enough to be homeless. Equal FUCKING opportunity!!
/r/MensRights11/09/12 03:20 PM
3

And remember, if feminism fails to solve any particular issue or indeed appears to make a situation worse, then the solution is always to apply more feminist principles in a stronger manner. Basically if the square peg won't go into the round hole it's because you're not using a big enough hammer.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 01:18 PM
2

Do what I did, email them and complain politely but firmly, perhaps if enough people do it they may rethink their campaign.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 11:53 AM
2

To even be 'seen' as sexist is to risk being alienated or shunned by strangers and acquaintances alike, particularly if they are female. Then there's the 'good manners' side to it; helping a female is still considered to be the height of good manners. Additionally, a male may act with exaggerated attentiveness and chivalry towards a prospective mate, demonstrating to said female that he is 'caring' and 'attentive' making himself more attractive. Then there's the social conditioning, everything f…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:49 AM
1

??????
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:15 AM
4

I'm really tired so I'll get straight to the point. Made up claims are easier to refute. 'They' don't care. They just DON'T care - makes absolutely no difference to them. If reasoned argument and facts made the slightest difference you would never hear an official or politician say any of the following: Men are paid more than women. Women don't lie about rape. Domestic violence is about the abuse of women. But you do. Even now. Despite all the contrary evidence. Despite the facts. Don't you get …
/r/MensRights10/09/12 11:57 AM
2

Absolutely.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:21 AM
2

NAWALT eh?
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:18 AM
3

IF it is the truth, or it is by and large the truth, how the hell can it be an 'extremist view'? I'm sorry but 'people' are always going to call us extremists - if they can't find any real evidence they will merely make it up.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:17 AM
1

It's not MY article, it is an article from this Reddits FAQ. The creator of this Reddit linked that article because, one would imagine, it captures and encapsulates what he thinks. This link is to a video by GirlWritesWhat and sums up feminism for quite a number of us Here
/r/MensRights09/09/12 12:25 AM
1

No.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 02:01 PM
2

I'm not very eloquent so I'll direct you to a link found in the FAQ for this reddit under the section, "4. Is the Men's Rights Movement anti-feminist?" What’s the difference between the men’s rights movement and feminism?
/r/MensRights08/09/12 08:07 AM
4

Ah, but you can change the colour of the sky, you can turn it pink with these 'Rose tinted' glasses! With these handy devices nasty old 'hypergamy' becomes 'liberation with a hint of empowerment' - glasses available from all major mass media retailers at the low, low cost of integrity, reason and sanity.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 07:57 AM
-7

You forgot the '/s'.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 06:03 AM
6

Yep.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:58 PM
3

Many guys now are very paranoid about their finances and think of it as a risk when they get married. It IS a risk.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 07:31 AM
1

What has this to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:09 PM
1

Bravo sir, bravo!
/r/MensRights06/09/12 11:43 AM
1

Thanks buddy, she was immaculate BEFORE conception - got it.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 10:54 AM
1

She had a mortal father AND was born pure - because that's how God wanted it. Immaculate conception.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 09:52 PM
2

What I was trying to say was that ALL women are 'impure', even virgins - she was 'pure' by God's will at from the time of conception.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 09:21 PM
2

No, that's virginal conception. Immaculate Conception means she, herself, was born without 'original sin' - she was Holy from birth. EDIT: Didn't read your reply properly... actually I did so I have not altered anything... (Obviously I was born under 'bonehead conception).
/r/MensRights05/09/12 09:02 PM
0

Sorry Typhoneblue - Research 'Immaculate Conception' then get back to us. (I mean no disrespect to you).
/r/MensRights05/09/12 08:33 PM
1

Nah, it's really quite long and complicated but women automatically have a higher social status than men, at least during the 19th century. It's all in formal etiquette, I've read a few books and it is VERY explicit on this point. Let me give you an example; men were expected to stand if a woman was to enter or leave a room regardless of their social standing etc. There were hundreds of rules regarding how you treated women, the only exception were servants and even then if you were to meet a wo…
/r/MensRights05/09/12 07:54 PM
2

You don't have it quite right. During the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, at least in England, all women had an automatically higher social status than men. What stopped women from marrying 'bad boys' was the fact that a daughter needed parental consent to marry (yes there were exceptional circumstances and elopement). Basically, she may be enamored by a total dick but her mother and particularly father would stop her from making an 'error in judgment'. Basically they steered her into marryi…
/r/MensRights05/09/12 10:21 AM
5

Excellent insight.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 05:17 PM
2

Oh I forgot it was covered in the 'MR Welcome pack'...
/r/MensRights28/08/12 11:19 PM
3

Or mother.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 11:17 PM
7

I can see your problem, 'murder' is the unlawful killing of one human by another. This does not include cows. Possibly chickens though...
/r/MensRights28/08/12 11:15 PM
0

I'll take this one... Pregnant women are always under the supervision of a doctor, if the doctor is suspicious or has cause to believe a miscarriage was an abortion they could be legally bound to report it. It's not perfect but it could work.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 10:59 PM
4

Seems fair.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 08:32 PM
1

I agree that it is an unjust and shitty law and that in a sane world he has done absolutely nothing wrong, but unless he is willing to face the very real prospect of prison, which by his tone he is not, he has foolishly placed himself in harms way. I loath the direction the world has turned and I am doing all I can to change it.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 08:15 PM
1

He was foolish because the law, as it stands, places any male 'snuggling' with a drunk female for the night in a very precarious situation, we all know where it could lead. The law is absolutely wrong but whether we like it or not it is still the law. That is the truth. Period. It's totally wrong and that's why we are here, to agitate for common fucking sense.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 03:54 PM
1

The fact is you BOTH behaved foolishly and, as long as you both are adults, you are equally responsible for the consequences of your actions - that's real equality.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 07:18 AM
7

It should be okay to tell a woman that.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 07:11 AM
17

"Stay away from her. Stop drinking. You set yourself up for this by getting drunk and going home with her." Wait a minute... Isn't that what feminists call 'victim blaming'?
/r/MensRights28/08/12 06:18 AM
12

As a male I accept that if I have sex she may get pregnant, and if that happens, I will be faced with no choice.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 04:38 PM
6

Do remember, abandonment and adoption happen after birth, therefore the argument, "My body, my choice." doesn't apply.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 04:08 PM
6

So it's not right?
/r/MensRights26/08/12 04:03 PM
10

It seems ridiculous to say that a man has the RIGHT to have sex, and also somehow the right to walk away from responsibility of his own actions. So women should not be allowed to abort, abandon or give up for adoption a child? After all It seems ridiculous to say that a woman has the RIGHT to have sex, and also somehow the right to walk away from responsibility of her own actions. Am I right?
/r/MensRights26/08/12 03:56 PM
20

Women have great power and men have great responisibility.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 03:51 PM
8

I think I see your blind spot.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 03:49 PM
15

Because, to quote from Spider-Man, "with great power, comes great responsibility."
/r/MensRights26/08/12 03:38 PM
25

Isn't it then fair to say, if women don't want a child, they shouldn't have sex?
/r/MensRights26/08/12 03:26 PM
22

In the western world, Pregnancy is ALWAYS a risk of coitus but carrying a child to term is entirely a woman's prerogative. A man NEVER has a choice to be a father or not after conception - beyond that point, men merely have legally enforced responsibilities, women have state sanctioned choices.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 03:23 PM
2

As I recall it seemed to be the MAJORITY of women on the show 'The Talk' that sniggered and laughed when Sharon Ozbourne made fun of a man who had been mutilated by his wife – food for thought.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 03:36 AM
1

No, I'm sorry it isn't. Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Mammalia Order: Primates Family: Hominidae Genus: Homo Species: H. sapiens Subspecies: H. s. sapiens Source(s): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human But Greg Hampikian is still an ignorant cretin, not because he has considered the obsolescence of men - it's because the logical constructs for his thesis are childishly feeble - and this coming from a scientist and professor! (Did the Bible mention anything about a second flood?...Plea…
/r/MensRights26/08/12 12:30 AM
3

Um, correct me if I'm wrong, regarding all the amazing technology, materials and procedures needed for IVF etc, you know all the stuff needed to make men 'obsolete'; were they not conceived, designed, invented, developed and manufactured by men? How can he possibly question the value of men? It's like sitting high up on the branch of a tree and saying, this limb supports me and stops me from falling so I'll just use this saw to disconnect myself from that useless hunk of wood called the tree tru…
/r/MensRights26/08/12 12:11 AM
2

Ever seen Starship Troopers?
/r/MensRights24/08/12 06:13 AM
3

It's complicated, but it is my belief that any democratic state that embraces liberal socialism will eventually devolve into a totalitarian feminist regime. The current social and political climates of countries who have embraced this political philosophy in the last twenty years such as the UK, Australia, Sweden et al. provide compelling, but not absolute, evidence that this is the case.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:17 PM
-1

Here in the UK it most certainly is.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 10:00 PM
1

So it was an honest mistake on your part, in which case I appologize for any implied slur on your character.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:59 PM
5

Don't argue with the crazy person, it's not his fault!
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:46 PM
2

Macmillan nurses?
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:42 PM
1

Somehow I don't think everyone understands this...
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:39 PM
0

You think she would have recanted her story if the Police did charge three men? As to your no victim, no crime. Absolute piffle! Walk up and down a quiet street calling out, "All Mexicans are lazy and stupid!". No victim there, particularly if no-one apart from a passing police officer hears you say it, then you can explain your theory of victimless crimes to the judge.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:38 PM
6

To quote Rimmer from Red Dwarf: Well, we know what to get you for Christmas. A double lobotomy and ten rolls of rubber wallpaper.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:24 PM
1

Nope, boys cannot participate! Men cannot participate! Well at least according to their web site. It's GIRLS and WOMEN only. What the SPARK summit FAQ said was, "In fact, while the SPARKteam will be girls and women only, male allies can take part in all actions, including future Summits, as allies." It means they can attend summit meetings as guests and participate in 'related actions' (stuff envelopes, fund raise etc) but absolutely no males in the actual organisation. It's ALMOST as if Slydrr …
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:53 PM
1

Understood sir.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:17 PM
1

Goodbye?
/r/MensRights22/08/12 06:31 PM
18

Well I think he's right, he IS a monster!
/r/MensRights22/08/12 06:18 PM
2

Another point being, if you think that a woman 'tricked into a situation where they believed contraception was being/would be used' constitutes rape then surely a woman who deliberately lies about being on the 'pill' would be a rapist? Should she then be put in prison for an extended period of time, placed for life on the Sex Offenders Registry, made to take classes and courses of treatments and monitored for the remainder of her days? Or have I missed something?
/r/MensRights22/08/12 06:08 PM
7

And your definition of 'few' and 'multitude' are...
/r/MensRights22/08/12 01:34 PM
1

I really don't understand this idea that in the past societies were 'misogynistic'; how do they explain things like the taj mahal or all the art, poetry and music dedicated to women?
/r/MensRights22/08/12 09:42 AM
1

You are funny, "Hate the haters!" - You can't see the hypocrisy?
/r/MensRights22/08/12 09:15 AM
2

So you cannot hate and have a valid point? I concede that emotion, particularly strong emotion, stymies rational thought but you seem to 'hate' those that hate, interesting how people work... your own prejudices blinds you and unsurprisingly you can't see it.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 12:33 PM
2

"Yes, people from the past were very often misogynists, because the whole culture was misogynistic. " - Yep, I guess you're right, these thinkers and philosophers were misogynistic because the culture was ‘misogynistic’. Sorry but you're committing the fallacy of 'not thinking it through'. These people often believed and expounded ideas and ideals contrary to the prevalent attitude of society at the time - that's why they are renown philosophers not 'X Factor' celebrities. I agree that they may …
/r/MensRights21/08/12 07:08 AM
5

I'm saying both are true, 'male disposability' is largely an inherent instinct and women are unable, by nature, to be equitable. Perhaps it may change in a few hundred, perhaps even thousands of years - but not today or tomorrow. Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. Can people overcome their natures? Only when we all grow pointed ears and have green blood!
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:55 PM
2

Have you read more articles than I? Possible but doubtful. I have advocated for men's rights for nineteen years or more, that's right, long before ANYTHING - at least anything I knew of; a lone 'crazy' voice in the wilderness. So is my opinion more valid than yours? No. "I have read literally thousands of articles created..." - That really was a foolish rationale. As to male disposability; it's been a hell of price that men have had to pay, perhaps far greater than the sacrifices expected of wom…
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:40 PM
2

Totally agree.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 09:30 PM
7

Give them a grant and make them government advisors? Do I win anything?
/r/MensRights20/08/12 09:23 PM
4

That told him!
/r/MensRights20/08/12 09:21 PM
2

I really wouldn't worry InfinitelyThirsting, after all they are just a bunch of 'crazies', bigots who are not your intellectual equal. Right?
/r/MensRights20/08/12 08:50 PM
7

I believe that 'male disposability' is largely an inherent instinct and not a social construct therefore it can never be solved, perhaps diminished somewhat, but never eradicated. As to what 'many mras' would think and say, I wouldn't presume to know - I know my own mind somewhat, but to pretend to know the minds of many is sheer arrogant hubris.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 08:40 PM
5

I really don't know if you could 'refute the hell out of their beliefs' in a reasoned and rational manner; minds undoubtedly far, far greater than yours held views which I'm sure you would find very misoginistic; from Plato, Nietzsche, Socrates and Kant to Oscar Wilde and Winston Churchill. I'm sure you could 'destroy' them all! Actually I don't. What I am trying to say is that perhaps you should listen very carefully and closely even to those voices you may find personally 'distasteful', perhap…
/r/MensRights20/08/12 08:20 PM
11

No, literally. You are not the MRM, neither am I, at this point we are merely a loose collective fighting the same enemey namely institutional feminisim. Male disposability is only one of many banners held on our side. I swear, if the 'feminists' don't defeat us this, 'my reasons for fighting are Holier than yours' will. I would also suggest that the main aim of the MRM for now should be 'survive and thrive'.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 07:54 PM
3

I cannot up vote enough, you wrote what I was thinking far better than I could have.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 07:37 PM
7

Do you personally have the wit and wisdom above all others to decide who is worthy to be a MRA? By what right or accomplishments do you claim to have this authority? Those that seek to destroy you are your enemy, not those that merely disagree with you.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 07:32 PM
7

The thing is they’re not 'crazies'; you may not agree with them, I may not agree with them but they are certainly NOT 'crazies'. Demonspawn is neither the first, nor the last person, to believe women's votes are 'bad for society'. I have read many well constructed arguments by seemingly very eloquent and rational individuals who share these views; accept them or refute them with logic and reason but don't be so arrogant as to demand others silence them because they don't sit well with your world…
/r/MensRights20/08/12 07:09 PM
1

Perhaps there is a 'past history' between the two of them?
/r/MensRights20/08/12 01:23 PM
4

Legolas-the-elf is determined to believe Demonspawn is misogynistic regardless of any evidence, therefore legolas-the-elf is himself a bigot. Defintion of bigot - a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 01:05 PM
3

Being obtuse and offensive is not very constructive.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 01:00 PM
3

Thank you for making this comment before I did.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 12:52 PM
2

By that reasoning, have a seperate men's and women's 100M sprint event at the Olympics is also misogynistic.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 06:38 PM
1

Your understanding makes me very happy.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 06:08 PM
0

Perhaps because the physical act of coitus and it's subsequent effects are entirely different for men and women...
/r/MensRights16/08/12 09:28 AM
0

As feminisim so blatently proves...
/r/MensRights16/08/12 09:18 AM
1

I believe women are far more herd like, I am sorry but I don't have the time to expound my reasoning here. All I can say is that it manifests its self in cultural phenomena like fashion, fads and social structures. Men have their own social paradigms but tend to be almost 'tribal' rather than tending towards a universal cohesiveness.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 09:11 AM
-1

Actually I wish I had not posted the aforementioned comment as it is rather complex to explain. But no, the reasons for the gendered popularity of football are largely very different for the success of '50 Shades of Grey'.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 09:00 AM
1

The correct answer is that it is NOT misogynistic.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 08:57 AM
1

Not THAT stupid... There have been academic feminists that claim (with a straight face) that logical thought is a patriarchal tool of oppression, so I'm not so sure.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:19 PM
3

If the offenders DID face jail (which I think will never happen) I believe it is probable that they would receive a HUGE amount of support and money from the feminist corner. GWW is too popular.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:14 PM
0

Question, is it misogynistic to say women are physically weaker than men?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 07:49 PM
-1

If women are not 'herd like' in their mentality how would you explain the success of '50 Shades of Grey'?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 07:46 PM
1

shamanicspacebum said 'insensitive', not 'irrational'.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 07:36 PM
4

I'm sorry but you misunderstand. I don't agree with demonspawn, my opinion is mine and mine alone born through countless hours of contemplation, observation and research. That we have come to the same conclusions is merely happenstance. Thirty years ago I sincerely and passionately believed in equality. I can clearly see now that I was unable to separate idealism from dispassionate rational understanding.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 07:31 PM
3

Whose to say what is fair? You? Me? Anyone? Everyone? Is it fair I didn't win the lottery? Is it fair I could never experience the pain, and pleasure, of motherhood? Is it fair I could never be as fast as Bolt even if I trained twice as hard as he does? No. We should gaze unflintchingly at the truth no matter how distastful or indeed how 'unfair' it appears to us and accept it as the truth. The truth is that Matt Forney is correct; every political revolution, in every county, in every age has be…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 06:59 PM
4

Did he once claim to hate women?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 06:15 PM
-1

Don't you mean strawperson?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 05:53 PM
3

I think what Demonspawn was trying to say is that men and women are different and therefore cannot be equal; painting an apple orange does not make it an orange. True eqauality would be liike having every event at the olympics open to both men and women - somehow I can't see it ever happening.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 05:50 PM
-2

Surely you should mean, "We are desperately short on engineers"?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:23 AM
6

The show's concept sickens me as does Allen's contemptible obsequious fawning.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 04:19 PM
2

So, by your reasoning 'good' is also 'a real thing' you would argue strongly against.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 09:08 AM
1

No, you made a valid point.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 09:03 AM
2

Excellent.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 12:51 PM
13

To clarify (for the slow). Rape (by that I specifically mean violent, forced intercourse) IS heinous but certainly no where near the MOST heinous crime imaginable.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:57 AM
13

Umm.... Grab a woman, put a gun to her head and say to her, have sex with me or I'll kill you! How many women would choose death? I think that gives an indication as to which crime is most 'heinous'. For that matter give a woman the choice between loosing all her possessions and being raped, or being tortured and being raped. Rape is the most heinous crime imaginable? Emotive poppycock!!!
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:53 AM
0

Very amusing.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 07:53 PM
29

No.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 01:54 PM
3

I don't wish to work hard and earn money for it to be spent on people I don't know.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 03:00 PM
7

Is it now?
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:12 PM
-1

Thank you for your reply PartTimeBadMan, again you are quite correct in that we don't know all the facts, actually without corroboration we really cannot be certain of any of them. It is the sentiment and reaction that appals me. Please do not misapprehend me; I am very much a staunch advocate of free speech. If people wish to hold deeply racist or sexists views – fine as long as they don’t physically harm, or advocate the harming of others they should be entitled to their opinions. This article…
/r/MensRights27/04/12 08:05 PM
-1

Fair comment. If the article is true then a man died in a particularly gruesome and painful manner for no more than confronting a woman for doing something she shouldn't. I found the comments particularly despicable. Sorting them by most popular and reading the first couple of pages; at least half, if not more, were jokes. "that's just nuts!" - Linda Holzer "testicular Homicide?" - ascri38223 (Top comment) "Grabbing a guy's testicals[sic] in a fight? That takes balls..." - swervinplumber I ask y…
/r/MensRights27/04/12 06:44 PM
1

Does anyone at college ever do their own research?
/r/MensRights26/04/12 06:21 AM
9

Adoption.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:13 PM
0

So men getting slapped is better than women getting groped?
/r/MensRights07/04/12 06:09 PM
1

I, upvoted, on yoru behaf.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 12:35 PM
23

Because feminists are benign and compasionate, dedicated to equality and freedom to all regardless of gender, age, race or ability... LOL!!!
/r/MensRights29/03/12 12:30 PM
3

In the UK police can only enter a house if they suspect a crime is being comitted. Given that the woman was outside and unharmed... Maybe it works differently there, perhaps police do have the power to kick down anybody's door on a whim...
/r/MensRights27/03/12 08:19 PM
2

Please don't feed the troll.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 07:59 PM
1

Why were the police in his bedroom?
/r/MensRights27/03/12 07:57 PM
3

Rubbish! In the case you sight, if it had been an adult male and no camera crew recording the whole incident, then he would have probably got away with it.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 07:55 PM
7

Fan-bloody-tastic!
/r/MensRights26/03/12 07:28 AM
7

Idiot.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 03:39 PM
8

"Maybe it doesn't affect boys but is actually more harmful for women who are told they are perfect princessesnbeginning at an early age." That's exactly the type is twisted logic that really pisses me off!!!
/r/MensRights23/03/12 07:30 AM
1

Correct! Logic and reason often take you to strange places...
/r/MensRights22/03/12 12:04 PM
5

Don't you mean, is there no end to the evil perpetrated by people in power?
/r/MensRights21/03/12 02:18 PM
1

Well bloody well check for yourself!!! Look up the weather report for that area on that day.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 08:31 PM
1

Please could you provide one, it's just that when I looked it up it said sleet (rain/ice) for that day.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 08:26 PM
4

I don't think he was lying.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 03:11 PM
4

Are you sure it was not snowing? I tried my best to find out weather conditions for Barrington on that day and the best I could find was there was a lot of rain, hail and snow. Police may argue that there wasn't any 'snow storm' but conditions were certainly bad. You should really check for yourself, but I think that the police are being less than honest...
/r/MensRights20/03/12 03:04 PM
15

I checked the weather conditions for that day March 2nd 2012 in Barrington and it was sleet - mixture of rain and ice...
/r/MensRights20/03/12 02:48 PM
3

Waves wand at advert, "Riddikulus!"
/r/MensRights10/03/12 10:13 PM
1

Here again we would disagree, I believe that boys playing with trucks and girls playing with dolls is natural manifestation of innate biological gender differences.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 11:46 PM
0

It means humans have a clear deliniation of what is male and female, it's not always fair but that's just unfortunate. I'm sorry you feel so uncomfortable in the body you were born with - I mean it. You may feel that me calling you a male is somehow an insult, it is not. If that is a problem then I suggest it is yours, not mine.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 11:40 PM
2

Again I ask, under what authority do you have the expectation to determine how others see you? If your chromosomes are XY, you have a penis and no womb why should I consider you anything other than male? If you broke the law would you expect a judge to send you to woman's prison? Would you be excluded from the draft in a time of war? Are you less likely to be effected by haemophilia?
/r/MensRights05/03/12 11:25 PM
1

Actually in the example above a molecular biologist would have made the determination that the subject was a male with a faulty chromosome. Male.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 11:01 PM
2

A fish that thinks it's a bird cannot fly no matter how hard it flaps its fins... (Flying fish and manta rays excepted!)
/r/MensRights05/03/12 10:55 PM
1

Live as a woman if you wish, call yourself a female if it so pleases you, but you have no right to demand that others think of you as anything other than a male if that is what they choose, without malice, to do.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 10:46 PM
-2

I identify as a god, so I am. Now bow down and worship me!! (Can you see where I am going with this?)
/r/MensRights05/03/12 10:32 PM
0

At its base level, XX and XY.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 09:47 PM
-1

Let me ask you: If I gave a sample of your DNA to a molecular biologist and asked them to determine the sex of the donor, what would they say?
/r/MensRights05/03/12 09:40 PM
0

Dammit Demonspawn! are you oppressing people with facts again? Shame on you!!!
/r/MensRights05/03/12 09:01 PM
0

So that 'rhetorical tool' would be fact?
/r/MensRights05/03/12 08:59 PM
1

Excellent.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 11:04 AM
5

Bravo GWW!
/r/MensRights02/03/12 08:09 AM
1

Argument from fallacy.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 08:50 PM
1

Well said!
/r/MensRights16/02/12 07:31 AM
-1

It's because imbecile really is.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 07:54 PM
6

Because men are not women?
/r/MensRights14/02/12 07:31 PM
-1

I'm curious, how exactly?
/r/MensRights14/02/12 11:18 AM
-2

Just ignore him JeremiahMRA. karmasutur3 is just being an obnoxious troll, it is beneath any reasonable person to engage in such a purile discourse.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 07:53 AM
2

Quite true, what he should have said was, "The problem with MOST women...".
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:33 PM
2

Demonspawn, please don't wind up the clockworkgirl. I think at least 42% of women are "batshit insane" and I'm not joking. Or am I?
/r/MensRights10/02/12 09:21 PM
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 09:14 PM
2

I think the answer is staring you in the facebook.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 02:39 PM
3

Thank you for your clarification.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 01:42 PM
1

Please read TheDongerNeedsFood's previous post...
/r/MensRights06/02/12 10:03 PM
5

Bingo.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 10:02 PM
1

The tactic of over reacting to every slight, imagined or otherwise, worked for feminists so why not give it a go?
/r/MensRights06/02/12 12:42 PM
1

I think Aesop would be down-right insulted by that!
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:17 AM
1

Aesop would be so disappointed to hear that.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:51 PM
1

"Unless f course you think mass cullings is desirable ethical behavior." Read Watchmen and figure it out for yourself. We have reached an impasse. Thank you.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 01:26 PM
1

"I got the impression because it is hard and takes long, you think whe shouldn't even try in the first place." You could only evolve humans with better natures by killing or sterilizing those that do not conform - otherwise it just will NEVER work. Period. This idea that by merely forcing people to act in a moral manner will somehow refine or define human nature in subsequent generations is contrary to accepted evolutionary theory. It's a question of genetics NOT ethics! "And why is it silly to …
/r/MensRights03/02/12 11:56 AM
1

I have enjoyed our little discussion. "That many dependent people today have it worse than a percentage of the slaves back then isn't the issue. The issue is that they had social class with no rights and not even a theoretical way to get out of it without their masters agreement." I contend that ostracized fathers have limited rights and no theoretical way to get out of it even with their mistress's agreement. "And even with all those concentrated and highly efficient mass killings of the world …
/r/MensRights03/02/12 07:59 AM
1

"We don't have slavery for example. We also don't crucify people. Just two small examples." Large corporations often use 'sweat shops', 'immigrant labour', convict work programs etc. Not all, and often only to the extent they can get away with but many. Additionally, the government allows, through alimony and child support laws, men to be slaves to their ex-wives. There again I’m sure many Roman slaves were treated with great kindness and compassion, educated and cared for. There again I admit, …
/r/MensRights03/02/12 12:59 AM
1

Ah, I see. You believe we are more 'enlightened' than nations of the past or indeed any of those that are less technologically advanced as ourselves? Are you saying we are more morally advanced than let's say the Roman Empire of antiquity? Interesting... Why do you think that? You couldn't measure the 'moral standard' of a nation on the sheer number of people killed could you? Otherwise America, given its involvement in two world wars and countless conflicts in its short life, would surely rank …
/r/MensRights02/02/12 10:52 PM
1

You're right, we must redouble our efforts!
/r/MensRights02/02/12 09:06 PM
0

Excellent, we concur. This could get ugly and very bloody.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 09:04 PM
1

We are so much more advanced than Aztecs, we now use predator drones to sacrifice humans on the alter of democracy - may the great god Capitalisim have mercy on us all!
/r/MensRights02/02/12 08:43 PM
1

You too? I have always felt like a zebra among horses - does that make sense to you?
/r/MensRights02/02/12 08:28 PM
1

Demonspawn, may I ask how you think this will end?
/r/MensRights02/02/12 08:20 PM
3

I understand entirely - to those who may have taken offence at my rather crude previous comment, please accept my appologies.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 08:07 PM
-6

Forget it Demonspawn, for some like white_cloud the epiphany will never come, such is the way of things.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 10:04 AM
9

"You're quite certain she's lying. Explain why not one person showed up to defend this guy." Sorry, I forgot, where MEN are concerned it's guilty until he can PROVE his innocence... Either she's fucking crazy or a murderess either way she should not be walking the streets. Period.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 04:08 PM
11

She tried to burn his penis (just a 'little' bit) by throwing petrol on his back then setting him on fire? WTF?
/r/MensRights24/01/12 02:02 PM
5

No gb2digg, you are fucking stupid - there was no evidence (apart from her testimony) that she was ever abused. What we are saying, you dumbass, is that if a man tried pulling the same shit in court they would find him guilty of murder AND throw in a charge of wasting the courts time.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 01:32 PM
2

Astounding, I wish they would cover this in schools.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 05:19 PM
0

Or are we just making up a test, and correlating it to another test we made up? Pretty much how it sounds...
/r/MensRights29/12/11 01:50 PM
6

Rape is more frequent than you think! I heard it happens to three in two women! There was this survey done in a maximum security sex offenders unit and they found EVERY SINGLE man is a sex offender - this was all done by real social scientists* and everything. *Is that an oxymoron?
/r/MensRights29/12/11 01:26 PM
1

Actually we probably walk into each new day blind as bats, with no knowledge before us and no perspective into the future? But don't let that stop you. Before you resond I invite you to read this: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/12/13/101213fa_fact_lehrer?currentPage=all
/r/MensRights29/12/11 01:08 PM
1

Excellent.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 09:20 PM
2

I'm rapidly becoming a fan of Demonspawn.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 07:18 PM
3

Men build civilizations, women create societies within them. This technological utopia you live in was overwhelming concieved, designed and built by men. Men largely did this for you, women. The day you fully understand and appreciate this underlying precept is the day you truly understand men and why this site exists. There's the water, so drink! Not thirsty I suppose...
/r/MensRights18/12/11 04:31 PM
3

I wonder arguecat3, are you truly aware of your motives for posting on this site? I know what you have claimed are your reasons but I fail to see what EXACTLY you want to know. Is life unfair to many women in developing nations? Yes. (That's as far as feminists/media like to delve.) Is life disproportionately unfair to women in developing nations compared to men? No, probably not on balance. (That's as far as objective reasoning can take you.) 'Rights' are as arbitrary a construct as 'good' or e…
/r/MensRights18/12/11 03:54 PM
3

Demonspawn, it's good to see a rational and coherent argument, thank you.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 03:10 PM
6

Because 6% of college-aged men, slightly over 1 in 20, will admit to raping someone in anonymous surveys, as long as the word “rape” isn’t used in the description of the act—and that’s the conservative estimate. Other sources double that number (pdf). Is that another way of saying, "Have you ever bought a woman drinks in the hope of sleeping with her?". Is that rape?
/r/MensRights16/12/11 10:30 AM
3

Feminist sociologists?
/r/MensRights12/12/11 02:45 PM
0

Choice, I believe, is about authority and responsibility; if we have the authority to make a decision we should be responsible for its consequences, am I right? If a man and a woman both choose to have a child - they are both equally responsible for the product of that joint decision, the child. That has to right? So logically, if a woman has bears a child to term and raises it without the consent of the man, she and she alone should be responsible for the consequences of her decision. There are…
/r/MensRights30/11/11 03:52 PM
-6

Let's see if I get this right. I don't believe women should have UNCONDITIONAL unilateral repoductive rights and I made a comment about women and handbags, therefore I hate women? And I was led to believe that only sith deal in absolutes!
/r/MensRights30/11/11 03:18 PM
-7

I am so sorry, here I was thinking this was the 'ad hominem' club. My mistake.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 02:48 PM
-15

"I get it I support a woman's right to choose..." "I do support a woman's autonomy over her body" "It just feels so fucking unjust" Such is the awesome power of social conditioning! Even now, faced with the stark and dire reality of forced fatherhood he STILL feels so committed to the notion of a 'woman's right to choose' that he must mention it twice. TWICE! A learned reflexive emotional response or foolishness, who knows? Please don't misunderstand me, I think it's a truly awful and distressin…
/r/MensRights30/11/11 02:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter