TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ManchurianDinnerDate Archive

View 23 posts and 100 comments by ManchurianDinnerDate on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/askTRP27/12/17 10:07 PM
14

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/askTRP21/12/17 10:27 AM
7

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/askTRP14/12/17 06:05 AM
6

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/17 06:42 AM
5

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/askTRP19/12/17 06:40 PM
5

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/askTRP27/12/17 05:03 PM
3

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/askTRP16/12/17 12:57 AM
3

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/askTRP21/12/17 10:34 AM
2

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/askTRP14/12/17 05:45 AM
2

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/askTRP14/12/17 03:01 PM
2

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/askTRP28/12/17 01:37 AM
2

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/askTRP26/12/17 02:00 AM
2

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/askTRP26/12/17 10:11 PM
2

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/askTRP14/12/17 01:37 AM
1

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/17 02:01 AM
1

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/askTRP14/12/17 05:01 AM
0

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/askTRP14/12/17 11:08 AM
0

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/askTRP27/12/17 09:24 PM
0

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/askTRP20/12/17 04:20 PM
0

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/askTRP17/12/17 01:34 PM
0

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/askTRP13/12/17 06:10 AM
0

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/askTRP14/12/17 10:24 AM
0

ManchurianDinnerDate/r/askTRP14/12/17 02:20 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-9

What do you mean? I don't follow.
/r/askTRP28/12/17 06:30 AM
0

I'm open-minded to that. What logic/reasons do you have, though? Because he is a known quantity in my life; I know that he slays high-value/hot pussy. OTOH, I give TRP people like you the benefit of the doubt, but it's ultimately unknown to me how successful you are in the SMP/RMP/MMP...
/r/askTRP28/12/17 01:58 AM
2

Go for a bodybuilders look Go for what women want according to the studies, right?
/r/askTRP28/12/17 01:25 AM
1

The document I linked to makes no mention of verbal stuff, right? There's no "patter"/"incantation" mentioned...
/r/askTRP28/12/17 01:23 AM
0

I mean, I don't know... Did you read the study?
/r/askTRP27/12/17 11:20 PM
-15

"Start lifting you twink," which itself is a cryptic reference to Turgenev's Russian epic Fathers and Sons How is that a reference to Fathers and Sons?
/r/askTRP27/12/17 11:13 PM
1

You're trying to rationalize not going to the gym because your lazy. It's weird that there's such a pervasive ideal of a hyper-jacked guy. According to the study quoted in the OP, that's the gay man's ideal, and it has nothing to do with the woman's ideal.
/r/askTRP27/12/17 11:10 PM
1

Good point. Maybe on bodybuilding.com there're a higher % of guys who are "too bulky" in accordance with what is quoted in the OP...
/r/askTRP27/12/17 11:09 PM
2

I get that. But what do you think about what I quoted in the OP?
/r/askTRP27/12/17 10:19 PM
1

You're right. Thanks! :) I wonder what u/GayLubeOil, u/HumanSockPuppet, u/VasiliyZaitzev, u/Archwinger, u/dr_warlock, u/MattyAnon, and other smart people think about the ideas in the OP.
/r/askTRP27/12/17 04:31 AM
1

Thanks for the response. The main point I'm hung up on is that you say it "has nothing yo do with plates, fwbs, or ons. This is where I think you are wrong. What did you think was wrong about that statement? The only way to figure out what you value in an ltr is to see multiple women for extended periods of time and see what you like in those relationships. Firstly, what exactly do you mean by this? Secondly, how does it conflict with the OP in any way?
/r/askTRP27/12/17 03:32 AM
1

Time kills relationships, a man can beat anything except time. What do you mean by this? My bro and I don't get it. Tell your brother to give up this perfect wife perfect husband bullshit for his sake. He has no such illusions. Sorry for any miscommunication on that front. But he does obviously (like anyone) want to have the best wife he can. Learn from guys like Brad Pitt or Brendan Frasier. What is the relevance of these two celebrities? I have no clue what the relevance is.
/r/askTRP26/12/17 09:22 PM
1

Why the heck does everyone keep talking to me about ADHD? I don't have ADHD...
/r/askTRP21/12/17 05:24 PM
1

I would argue that men are generally more likely to experience misery from this, due to their higher sex drive. That's a good point. Especially as women approach menopause. Although, I'm not familiar with what exactly happens to the male sex-drive in middle-age. I think it's safe to assume that it declines a lot less rapidly than the female sex-drive, since males remain fertile for a lot longer. Having said that, there's a lot more to marriage than sex. Men might have sexual needs that women don…
/r/askTRP21/12/17 05:22 PM
0

That's a good point; some people choose to stick it out for the sake of the kids But it's not gendered, right? Women and men both do this...
/r/askTRP21/12/17 04:36 PM
1

Just do ">X" and X will appear as a quote. See this for other formatting.
/r/askTRP21/12/17 04:00 PM
2

man gives all, for nearly 0 appreciation I haven't witnessed this very often in my personal life; most people I know (male and female) are appreciative when others help them. I'm sure that there are female humans who have that "spoiled"/manipulative/psychopathic lack of appreciation for what others do for them. But your broad/generalized statement suggests that you have evidence for this occurring at a massive frequency among the female population. There are male and female psychopaths. I don't …
/r/askTRP21/12/17 03:22 PM
1

This is why Briffaults Law is useful and judging from the number of guys who comment they want an LTR because want someone to have their back or grow old with, more men need to be aware of it. It's good to be aware that marriage is not a contract that binds you to someone for life. I mean, I don't know how marriage law works. If it is such a contract then it has no meaning, though, because it can be terminated through annulment/divorce/whatever. I still think it's (1) common-sense and (2) non-ge…
/r/askTRP21/12/17 02:55 PM
2

What exactly did it achieve for you? And how exactly did it do that for you? The only downside is you can't go back and write more once you submit. What do you mean?
/r/askTRP21/12/17 02:01 PM
1

How did it work? Did you do Peterson's program?
/r/askTRP21/12/17 01:52 PM
0

Pointless discussion where you discuss the outliers and try to fit a trend around them. What do you mean by "discuss the outliers?" You're right that PPD is not practical advice-oriented stuff.
/r/askTRP21/12/17 01:32 PM
0

Not a troll. Why do you think that I'm a troll?
/r/askTRP21/12/17 01:11 PM
-5

This is not coercion, this is imploring the other person to be reasonable, and it won't work. There is an element of coercion, though. Suppose this person is no longer attracted to you; they want out. You are essentially shackling them to you in order to honor something you did for them in the past. You are trying to guilt them into staying with you. Shouldn't they be free? If you truly care about them then don't you want them to be happy? It's incredibly selfish to chain them to you if they wan…
/r/askTRP21/12/17 12:29 PM
1

Huh? I don't have ADHD. More like OCD if anything. Do you have ADHD?
/r/askTRP21/12/17 11:56 AM
1

This may be obvious to you OP, but most men believe the exact opposite. Isn't there any element of coercion in saying, "I bought you a lot of shit or did X/Y/Z for you or had your back in the past so therefore you have to stay with me even though you don't want to anymore (or aren't attracted to me anymore or are attracted to someone else more)?" That's weirdly coercive. Is that really the way most people think about relationships? Also, is there any evidence that men are more likely than women …
/r/askTRP21/12/17 11:52 AM
1

The main take-away is that don't expect women to act like men. At best they will act like defective men. I have no idea what this means. Briffault's Law seems to be saying that women are disloyal and will abandon you in a heartbeat if they no longer get the benefit they want from your interaction/relationship. I get that. Do men not act like that too? I mean, is there any way to quantify and scientifically compare the relative disloyalty of the two sexes? And unless it's something ridiculously l…
/r/askTRP21/12/17 11:34 AM
2

I think at TRP we have negative view of beta traits not because its somethign bad but because it generally comes from low value "beta" guys. That's interesting. Can you expand on that? Are you basically say that if attraction is there (SMV/RMV is high enough) then betaness is all to the good? It's certainly true that context is everything. If a Victoria's Secret model gave you flowers/chocolates you'd think it was fucking awesome. If some 400-pound disgusting ugly woman gave you the same flowers…
/r/askTRP21/12/17 11:23 AM
1

Sure. You're talking about what matters to women and how SMV/RMV works in their eyes. It's not like beta (provider) traits are necessarily negative; you need a balance between alpha and beta. Most men are way too beta and it comes across as them trying to buy the woman off and grovel and those men will at most be beta-bux in her eyes. (There are exceptions; she might be extremely attracted to him or into it for whatever reason, or flattered or whatever; one person's vomit-inducing betaness is an…
/r/askTRP21/12/17 11:11 AM
1

There’s a time and place to be agreeable to build comfort and show I’m a human being. Any insight into when to be agreeable vs. disagreeable? (I know there are no exact formulas but...) Go out and try mirroring and report back to us your results. Way more useful than armchair quarterbacking behind a computer. You might even get laid from it. Not quite in a position to but I will try once I'm remotely high SMV and not impotent (SSRIs).
/r/askTRP20/12/17 02:58 AM
1

No. You?
/r/askTRP20/12/17 02:41 AM
1

If a chick tells you to leave, it's a shit test, an objection. What if she legitimately wants you to fuck off? Then it's emphatically not a "shit test" and it will be very awkward/autistic to stick around... The customer is free to leave whenever he wants. Otherwise you should be pulling them into your frame. Interesting. But how can this shit work on someone who's read Cialdini and stuff? I used to do magic as a teen. I knew about misdirection. It's true that magicians could still fool me despi…
/r/askTRP19/12/17 09:46 PM
1

Customer - The price is too high. Salesman - I agree (the price is high because) we have a high quality service. If the word "too" were removed then there would be no issue... "Too high" price means that the price is inappropriate even when taking the product's quality into account. The complaint is not that the price is high; it's that the price is too high relative to the quality of the product (however high that quality may happen to be).
/r/askTRP19/12/17 09:04 PM
1

matching and mirroring or pacing and leading. So Win Bigly is the best book on how to match/mirror and how to pace/lead? What other books are the best for these four things (match/mirror, pace/lead)? I agree, we have a quality service. Are you paying cash or credit? How could this ever work? Only a dumbass would listen to your agreement and then pay the full price that you both just agreed was too high... (Furthermore, how would a salesman respond if the customer said, "I know about your Psych 1…
/r/askTRP19/12/17 08:18 PM
1

I would like to see what /u/TRPAndNofapGotMeLaid thinks about this.
/r/askTRP19/12/17 07:49 PM
1

See the 2016 election as an example. What do you mean by this?
/r/askTRP19/12/17 07:49 PM
0

Maybe you're right. I know that being disagreeable af can create an awesome sexual dynamic. I've also had disagreeableness make a girl angry and fuck things up. But maybe in the latter cases the girl simply isn't physically attracted enough. So women do want disagreeableness but they want it from a man they're attracted to. Edit: I said "physically attracted enough," but I should've just said "attracted enough," because it's much more than just the physical for women.
/r/askTRP19/12/17 07:47 PM
1

But that’s not what this sub is about... I don't think that he does this 24/7 with everyone in all scenarios. It's a specific technique for a specific goal: to get laid.
/r/askTRP19/12/17 07:39 PM
1

How do you know that agreeability is a bad way to get into a girl's pants? Have you tried it?
/r/askTRP19/12/17 07:37 PM
1

not be her echochamber. Sounds like there might be psychological merit to this idea of agreeability, though. Who doesn't like a person who mirrors them and agrees with them? Might be smart af and a great way to be charming/affable/attractive. I often find that things sour with a woman and the conversation stalls awkwardly whenever we clash on something. Like I'll say, "Do you ever find that X?" And she'll go, "No, not really." Then there's an awkward pause because that line of conversation is a …
/r/askTRP19/12/17 07:36 PM
1

googling it. Which terms should I google? Does it have a name? you emphasize or reinforce whatever the other person is saying and avoid challenging and adding new ideas to it. Great articulation of the basic idea. Can you give an example or two of what this sounds like? Is it just a basic thing like the following: "I love Starbucks." "Starbucks is great." Or: "Blink-182 is awesome." "Yeah, Blink-182 is awesome." I encourage you to look at authors that wrote about game. Which ones? (Everyone reco…
/r/askTRP19/12/17 07:34 PM
1

What do you think about the technique?
/r/askTRP19/12/17 07:30 PM
2

Have you even heard of the technique that he describes? I use acceptance technique or reflection conversation. I never ask or question, I only respond to women by reemphasizing what they are saying.
/r/askTRP19/12/17 06:57 PM
1

you attract what you think about. Like The Secret? But I thought you said it was "woowoo"...which would suggest that you think it's silly.
/r/askTRP17/12/17 03:59 PM
1

I'm sure you've heard that woowoo shit about the cells in your body vibrating and everything being connected. Which "woowoo shit" did you have in mind here? That shit is real whether you want to believe it or not. Again, which shit are you referring to in this sentence?
/r/askTRP17/12/17 03:28 PM
1

That could never help you. What about the idea that it would inspire you to take 100% advantage of every opportunity in life, because you would think about how these less fortunate people would cut their dicks off to have the opportunities that you have?
/r/askTRP17/12/17 03:21 PM
1

People have a lot of (1) inhibitions and (2) insecurities that mess with their sexual game. The post discusses a strategy to overcome (1) and (2). Is that not relevant to sexual game, then?
/r/askTRP17/12/17 01:57 PM
1

What do you like about Asian brides?
/r/askTRP17/12/17 01:30 PM
1

Why not?
/r/askTRP17/12/17 01:30 PM
1

LARP What is "LARP?" All I'm saying is that if Merger lied then he did a LOT of homework because my brother who is successful af found Merger's details/descriptions to be plausible/valid/solid. u/Merger-Arbitrage
/r/askTRP14/12/17 07:52 PM
1

I read the sidebar and the top posts! :)
/r/askTRP14/12/17 06:34 PM
1

Don't you think that u/Merger-Arbitrage is a badass/cool/awesome dude? For one, he and his wife are financially successful af. I can confirm that; he gave details about his dope career. I told my successful-af brother the details and my brother said he is legit.
/r/askTRP14/12/17 06:27 PM
1

I wonder what u/Merger-Arbitrage would say about this.
/r/askTRP14/12/17 06:17 PM
1

None of the Asian women I've fucked have pulled that tentacle-rape screeching nonsense. That's a relief. Apparently they "squeak" or sound like they're getting raped. I've heard that here on askTRP; the guys who said that probably have no experience and are just talking shit. Obviously some women are natural more (1) sensitive, (2) sensual, (3) sexual, (4) libidinous, (5) sexually-talented, and (6) vocal than other women. In addition to that, the hotter/more-talented/more-skilled the man and the…
/r/askTRP14/12/17 03:56 PM
1

Well, help a brother out?
/r/askTRP14/12/17 03:49 PM
1

Why will they disagree? Maybe you had to hear her vocalizations to understand. Maybe you had to be there. It's the most beautiful/awesome sound I've ever heard.
/r/askTRP14/12/17 03:48 PM
1

Sorry for lack of clarity. She made LOUD noises. She was LOUD. Just touching her body anywhere made her MOAN and YELL. Incredible experience.
/r/askTRP14/12/17 03:36 PM
1

“if you’re going to use your outside voice anyways, let’s get out of here.” Clever. Obviously you need to be in a state of abundance/confidence or else you will not be able to exude DGAF. You can't fake DGAF. You need to actually be in that position or else the signals will betray your scarcity. That's a great line. But she might have a good comeback, in which case you would need yet another clever line in response to that...
/r/askTRP14/12/17 03:34 PM
0

? Why?
/r/askTRP14/12/17 03:32 PM
1

u/Merger-Arbitrage also added this excellent point: Game = your ability to leverage you looks, smarts/status and character/personality to attract women. This is the only definition that works and makes sense practically. I do not know of any PUA-specific techniques that are beneficial. I listed all of the ones I tried. Humor and flirting aren't PUA-specific techniques. They are, well, flirting and humor. I wish they had good guides to this stuff, but they didn't. Even on forums (ignoring The Gam…
/r/askTRP14/12/17 03:30 PM
1

What are you confused about?
/r/askTRP14/12/17 03:06 PM
1

Maybe u/Merger-Arbitrage can offer some examples of (1) male game and (2) how to leverage/show-off your positive traits without appearing to be doing so (how to be subtle/stealthy/smart about selling yourself). Sorry to bug him, but he's fucking smart and fucking cool. He tried the "classic PUA-specific techniques and lines straight from The Game by Neil Strauss": Relentless cold approaching Indirect openers "Negging" Approaching from the side 3 second rule Using canned openers Intentional attem…
/r/askTRP14/12/17 03:05 PM
1

Would have said " oooh you didn't take your medicine this morning did you? " ( while swirling my index finger around my ear ( coocoo) Isn't this a butthurt reaction, though? Does it all depend on the delivery? You'd have to be very lighthearted in your delivery when saying something so caustic or else you would come across as so butthurt...
/r/askTRP14/12/17 02:33 PM
1

I'm so confused. lol.
/r/askTRP14/12/17 02:32 PM
1

There's no vocality-aspect that's independent of the man? For example, Asian women are known to be vocal and also to have shitty vocals that sound like they're being raped or sound squeaky or something. Is that in the man's control?
/r/askTRP14/12/17 01:33 PM
-1

Let's not confuse vocality and virginity, although they might correlate. The former is fucking INSANE to behold. The latter is maybe a drawback...I guess it is if you say so...I'm not very sexually-experienced.
/r/askTRP14/12/17 01:13 PM
1

But shit at sex. Tbh, her religion got in the way, so we never went very far. But she was far from a starfish. She was thrusting her hips against me, dry-humping, asking me to "Wrap my long legs around her," and just all-around passionate af. This girl was quivering with ecstasy/joy and her own body's reactions to what I was doing were making her eyes as wide as dinner-plates, turning us both on, and filling us both with wonder/joy/delight. And I can't stress the vocality enough. Let's not confu…
/r/askTRP14/12/17 01:13 PM
1

Huh? lol.
/r/askTRP14/12/17 01:09 PM
1

Interesting idea. I wonder what u/Vandaalen thinks about it. Is it not very supplicatory/beta? Also, why do you think that she will "look like a bitch" if she rejects your drinks/sweet/mint? I can see that being true but I can also see the offer a gift being seen as a bit creepy/weird... I could totally see her screaming at the "nerd" again and everyone thinking that the "nerd" was creepy/autistic for not getting the hint about her lack of interest...
/r/askTRP14/12/17 11:56 AM
1

Everybody knows that who is who? I'm confused. :S I think you may have me confused with someone else. Or is this some kind of inside-joke or prank?...
/r/askTRP14/12/17 11:10 AM
1

The video is just an attempt to show that you aren't to be fucked with. I wouldn't expect to actually get it, but the attempt is enough. Is it even legal to just pull out your phone and record someone in a bar? a shit test is over the top for a reason. Why? What was the reason? I wonder what u/Vandaalen and u/VasiliyZaitzev and u/GayLubeOil think about this.
/r/askTRP14/12/17 10:59 AM
1

Well, the line was something REALLY bad. I think it was, "Is your father a thief? Because he stole the stars from the sky and put them in your eyes." Or something RETARDED like that. lol. I can't remember, though.
/r/askTRP14/12/17 10:58 AM
1

u/Vandaalen may have ideas.
/r/askTRP14/12/17 10:48 AM
1

I've read the Haines post. But how exactly do you implement that? And I'm not sure about the video... And some TRP guys are saying that this does not sound like a shit-test; isn't there a risk of serious delusion in seeing everything as a shit-test?
/r/askTRP14/12/17 10:46 AM
1

Women shit-test everyone including other women. Why? And why other women?
/r/askTRP14/12/17 10:42 AM
1

Teasing/shit-testing/flirting isn't immature, is it? How so?
/r/askTRP14/12/17 10:41 AM
2

Maybe laugh about it with your friend and be like "we need to come up with a better pickup line." Of all the reactions people have suggested, this is my favorite so far. It's smart/carefree/funny/non-butthurt. They just tell him to get lost, turn away, and ignore him. Why are they harsh like that? Why not just say "not interested?"
/r/askTRP14/12/17 10:37 AM
0

Why? What?
/r/askTRP14/12/17 10:36 AM
1

It was hilarious.
/r/askTRP14/12/17 10:33 AM
1

If she shouted at me to walk away id probably get my camera phone out and sit down next to her just to see what happens. Interesting. What would happen next if I did that? What if she called the bouncers to kick me out? Or said that I was sitting with her against her will?
/r/askTRP14/12/17 10:33 AM
2

As to the girl who screamed... agree and amplify or sy something ridiculous to make her look like the fool. Can you be more specific? Also work on your smv. She called you a nerd for a reason. That reason probably being you look like one. I assume it was a combo of low-SMV, my cringey shyness, and the extreme cheesiness of the pick-up line.
/r/askTRP14/12/17 10:32 AM
2

Just spitballing here, but this sounds like a setup. Your female "friends" probably talked to the girl beforehand and set you up for a humiliation just for shits and giggles. Approaching a girl at the behest of your female friends is dumb to say the least. It's possible. They knew the girl, but I don't know how well. They seemed a bit bummed when I came back to the table, though...but for all I know they could've been laughing their asses off inside or maybe they were genuinely a bit bummed beca…
/r/askTRP14/12/17 10:30 AM
3

Look over at her friend and say "Whats your friends problem" Isn't this a very butthurt/whiny/beta thing to say? What if her friend said, "Her problem is that you're a huge fucking nerd!" or something... be carefree "NO I WILL NOT HAVE SEX WITH YOU, YOU PSYCHO" while you walk away Doesn't this make you look crazy, since she just rejected you and you're pretending that she wanted to have sex? Also, how do you be "carefree" while (A) yelling something (you typed it in caps) and (B) calling her a "…
/r/askTRP14/12/17 10:19 AM
2

One time a girl screamed, "GO BACK OVER THERE AND SIT DOWN, YOU NERD!" when I tried to hit on her. My female "friends" had sent me over to her with a cheesy pick-up line. I was mortified. What should've been my reaction? Or should I have reacted at all? I wonder what /u/VasiliyZaitzev thinks about this situation.
/r/askTRP14/12/17 06:03 AM
1

But it's not just about overinvesting your time/energy, it's also about turning them off, right? It's what your signalling... Like I said, you're not actually overinvesting THAT much if texting her a bit was going to lead to sex, but the point is that it likely won't b/c of the neediness/desperation/over-availability that it signals...
/r/askTRP14/12/17 05:26 AM
1

You don't want to be needy, right? Being too available=needy...
/r/askTRP14/12/17 05:24 AM
1

Is it to avoid seeming needy? What is the exact logic? I don't think that it's about overinvestment; it takes like 2 seconds to text someone so you could text them a lot with minimal investment... I think it's about psychology of not seeming needy... (I used to spam girls on Facebook/text and it was a huge turn-on and it made them think I was too "intense" and probably weirded/creeped them out.)
/r/askTRP14/12/17 05:13 AM
1

Maybe /u/QuickLogAccount can offer some advice, since the quote in the OP is from him. I guess that one obvious principle is that she should be investing as much (1) time and (2) money into the relationship as you are. But I guess that even if she is then she could still be a serial monogamist... (Also, why call a branch-swinger a "serial monogamist?" Don't branch-swingers usually cheat? How is that monogamy?)
/r/askTRP14/12/17 04:57 AM
1

Good point. But aren't there gifted liars? And aren't there smart/dedicated liars who rehearse their story and get it straight to avoid inconsistencies?
/r/askTRP14/12/17 04:25 AM
1

Too bad there's no way to be foolproof.
/r/askTRP14/12/17 04:23 AM
1

There are studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/17 04:06 AM
0

Why should paternity fraud be criminalized? I think it's terrible, but criminalization is always a case that has to be made very carefully... It's like hate speech. Don't like it, but I'm very anti-criminalization when it comes to that...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/17 04:05 AM
2

scheming women Scheming in what way? What do you have in mind here?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/17 03:56 AM
1

You can ask questions, but not ones that ping her sense that you are digging. How do you do this? She'll eventually give herself away if she is not being truthful. How? Doesn't this depend on how smart/craft/sneaky a person is? Especially if she got busted once in the past and therefore is especially smart about it now... I wouldn't be entertaining as a possible LTR any girl that you view initially as likely a CC rider or serial monogamist. There are women that will not throw those flags. There'…
/r/askTRP14/12/17 03:55 AM
4

Don't you find it a bit sad that all women can't have their dream man? I hate this world. I wish that every man ticked all their boxes so that nobody would have to be disappointed... Fuck this world. Fuck genetic scarcity. I hope that one day every man is sexy/smart/awesome and every woman is sexy/smart/awesome...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/17 03:45 AM
1

What if she says she's been in a string of relationships but masks the true number to make it sound reasonable? You would have know way to know that she was really swinging an absurd amount... By the way, what is an absurd amount? Is a new boyfriend every year too much?
/r/askTRP14/12/17 03:26 AM
1

And then some are actually loyal? So there are the loyal ones, the cheaters, and the serial monogamists... When I say "loyal" that doesn't mean that they will never lose attraction and move on (or maybe even "branch-swing"), but that's part of life...every human being does that...
/r/askTRP14/12/17 03:00 AM
1

But are all women serial monogamists? These people are a particular breed of highly manipulative women...
/r/askTRP14/12/17 02:45 AM
1

Interesting. So women do like bulky men as long as they're not on roids? I wonder where the idea about their preferring swimmers' bods comes from...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/17 02:25 AM
3

Toned. Women like the swimmer's body more than the bodybuilder stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/17 01:54 AM
1

Why would that be? So I guess you're saying the movie conservation in the OP is wrong...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/17 01:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter