| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | That's 7665 days.Yeah you are completely right, I understand now. Btw thats sounds absolutely horrible, this didnt happen in the last 100 years though, right? | /r/MensRights | 06/01/17 09:53 AM |
| 1 | That's 7665 days.Youre right, and its also important for them to not know that they can make any verdict because they need to as you say, refuse even though they dont know they are allowed to. Ive been wrong. Just like the jury can interpret the law case by case, I shouldnt judge the whole idea by a few individual examples. | /r/MensRights | 05/01/17 04:16 PM |
| 1 | That's 7665 days.But thats still vigilante justice. However justified the actions would be morally, wouldnt this erode the justice system as a whole. Plus, who is he to be judge, jury and executioner in a case where he could have just stopped the guy and taken him to the police. I can understand the sentiment, and I wouldnt find the fathers character reprehensible afterwards aswell, but in my opinion this is a slippery slope. " I was justified in killing him, because I saw him drive to a bar, and then go inside,… | /r/MensRights | 05/01/17 01:19 PM |
| 4 | That's 7665 days.Wait so the right to overrule law is given to the jurors, but informing them about this power is illegal? I mean it makes sense to not tell them that they basically dont need to regard the law at all, but then why does that mechanism even exist, if you dont tell them and they dont know aobut it. | /r/MensRights | 05/01/17 10:38 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter