TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MangoFox Archive

View 0 posts and 43 comments by MangoFox on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

It's interesting that although the 12-month figures stayed about the same for men (as you said), the lifetime figures changed significantly. In the 2012 report, 5.9% of men reported having been made to penetrate at some point during their life. In the 2016 report, 10.7% of men reported the same lifetime statistic. This is in spite of the negligable difference between the 2012 and 2016 reports' 12-month statistics. In the 2012 report, the number was 1.5%; in the 2016 report, the number was 1.3%. …
/r/MensRights27/04/23 10:01 PM
42

Women don't have any power. Men have it all. That's why when there's a conflict on one of the most influential sources of information, between those who want to be gender inclusive and those who only want to include women, those who only want to include women win without much difficulty. That makes sense, right?
/r/MensRights28/06/20 07:46 PM
1

A "god-digger" is like a gold-digger, but much more ambitious.
/r/MensRights07/02/20 08:55 AM
3

Geez, that last one... I strongly hope that I never have a "friend" who would encourage me to harm myself to destroy an innocent person's life. But if I do, she better not fucking film it and giggle her ass off as it's happening.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 10:09 AM
8

For context: Recent developments about Amber Heard Connection between Amber Heard and L'Oreal
/r/MensRights04/02/20 09:41 AM
-2

Which would admittedly make the world a better place.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 06:05 AM
18

Not knowing anything about breast cancer... does chopping off the breasts actually prevent it?
/r/MensRights05/12/19 12:10 PM
1

Thank you!
/r/MensRights11/10/19 10:41 AM
1

winner of custody: when you filter down to only cases in which both parents wanted the child, men are near parity in winning. That stat is skewed by men who do not want custody. Big if true. I'll add my request for a citation to the others.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 11:37 PM
61

Of course, the wage gap is a real and pervasive issue that affects women across all industries — even if Silverman’s story was a flawed example of it — and her statement suggests that this sort of quibbling back and forth about one anecdote risks diluting the important message underneath. Good ol' Salon, using this instance as evidence that the gender gap is more important.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 03:27 PM
2

It sounds like a great idea to me, as far as you can go before actually meeting the candidate. It just seems like an expensive proposition, given that you now have to have multiple layers of hiring groups - some who know the person's identity in order to audit their resume, and some who don't know the person's identity to make actually decisions. Gender-blind hiring might help a lot to counter bias, but quotas end up looking a lot nicer to those who set the budget.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 07:50 PM
6

Copying my post from /r/MRref: I think the OP is referring to the information found in Table 6. The rates for intimate partner violence in the last 12 months are higher overall for men than for women. They're lower for lifetime statistics, which (from what I've seen) is typical for this type of research - men generally report more instances of recent abuse than instances of abuse over a lifetime. As a sidenote, this is another study in which being made to penetrate is not considered a form of ra…
/r/MensRights23/03/15 04:54 AM
1

You say not all men are monsters? Imagine a base full of space marines 10% of them are zombies Go ahead. Shoot a few No, you are the demons
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:13 AM
1

Perhaps you might read the OP then, and see what OPer was referring to with this term?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:12 AM
2

This argument seems perfectly sound to me. It just isn't enough to justify the inequality in my mind.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 12:39 AM
2

Thank you. This does seem fishy.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:59 PM
2

Do you have links to these other similar posts?
/r/MensRights21/08/13 06:05 PM
6

Definitely /r/TumblrInAction.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 07:37 PM
1

I've got mixed feelings about the rest of the article, but the beginning was brilliant. By the time he called his bluff, I was all up in arms about what this guy (supposedly) did.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 11:30 PM
1

A repost is what it is.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 11:21 PM
1

I'm sorry you're getting downvoted. Your point makes sense, even if I completely disagree with it.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 02:28 PM
1

I like this statement more: Ridicule is like repression. Both give place to respect when they fail to produce the intended effect. It's just as meaningful, and it's actually verifiable, coming from his book.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 06:33 PM
1

You've got a good point. I still think that "Center for Men and Women" is awkward, but specifically including the genders does portray a positive message about the center.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 04:48 PM
31

"Student's Resource Center for Men and Women" seems like an awkward name. That description could refer to something as generic as a public library. When I hear "women's center", I at least know what it's referring to (although I may not agree with the reasons for the correlation). I feel like it would be better if you all cut out the "men and women" part, since it seems kind of redundant, and altered the rest of the name so that it referred more specifically to the services offered; for example,…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 08:01 PM
5

Can we not shoehorn this into every discussion ever, please?
/r/MensRights19/03/13 07:02 PM
2

Sounds like Mr. John McCain agrees with you: As this new rule is implemented, it is critical that we maintain the same high standards that have made the American military the most feared and admired fighting force in the world - particularly the rigorous physical standards for our elite special forces units
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:04 AM
4

Who the hell down votes things like this? Gee, maybe people who thought, for whatever reasons, that this wasn't a good post for r/Mensrights? Some people might think that the story wasn't very interesting because they don't view childhood bullying as a strong indicator of gender roles. Or maybe they don't think the linked web site is a very reliable news source. I don't know. What I do know is that people upvote and downvote posts for a variety of reasons, and that when you complain about downvo…
/r/MensRights10/01/13 06:25 AM
5

I've got a big red list of illustrative quotes in Aerik's usertag. Going to that subreddit is like looking at a candy cane!
/r/MensRights10/12/12 12:08 PM
0

If it's a meme or rage comic, yes.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 04:39 AM
2

You know that phrase, "victim blaming"? Uh, yeah. Victim blaming.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:47 AM
1

Never doubt that a blog full of cutesy pictures of little signs can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. -Margaret Mead
/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:18 AM
0

To everyone who thinks these are real feminists
/r/MensRights13/11/12 01:24 AM
24

You know, after seeing how polite the /r/Feminism mod was, I think I'm going to check that place out. Thanks for the tip!
/r/MensRights11/11/12 03:49 AM
3

Hey, /r/genderequality is a real subreddit! Maybe we can use it for that exact purpose! genderequality: it means feminism Well, that was a dud.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 10:17 PM
2

SRS stands for ShitRedditSays, a subreddit where self-proclaimed feminists gripe about everything that offends them, particularly other Reddit posts. It's generally hated around Reddit, and especially so in r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 10:13 PM
5

I doubled back and went a different direction, he followed. So in other words, you took some action of your own to check his motives before assuming that he was a rapist. That seems to be more than what the women described in the email did.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 12:38 AM
7

Which isn't enough. Seriously, who's going to spend their standard action imposing a -2 to an enemy, when you could just kill the enemy instead? If intimidation were a valid tactic, maybe we'd see more variety than just "full attack, full attack, full attack." Wait, we're in /r/rpg, right?
/r/MensRights22/10/12 12:31 AM
1

10/10, would be trolled again.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 06:39 AM
-2

LGBTQAPI This doesn't have enough letters. Can we please add some more?
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:33 AM
1

Heck, let's take this one step further. What Triceratops is suggesting is literally the Holocaust.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 12:56 AM
32

Because your goal is totally to get their approval.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 11:56 PM
0

Relevent?
/r/MensRights06/08/12 01:10 AM
8

Why would the parents of the police care?
/r/MensRights03/07/12 05:53 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter