TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MantorokBeatsAll Archive

View 0 posts and 63 comments by MantorokBeatsAll on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

As if every person is going to care about that. There's tons of people that would take advantage of free money. Especially if the divorce wasn't nice, which it very frequently isn't. Some people would take pleasure it taking their exes money.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 02:25 AM
1

Why would you look sooner rather than later? Sounds like prime time to chill and collect free money for 5 years before you get a job. There's definitely tons of people that would look at it that way anyway.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 02:08 AM
0

I know you do, otherwise you wouldn't comment. But I can see you're unable to be mature at all. I guess something I said triggered you. Probably too much truth. I guess convincing yourself you like being forced to pay alimony is better than suicide. Anyway, enjoy your bitter loneliness.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 12:20 AM
0

Do you think this is making you look good?
/r/MensRights30/10/16 12:03 AM
0

Not hard to tell why you got divorced. You're a thoroughly shit human being. Maybe you could try making some sort of counter argument instead of trying to insult me for disagreeing with you.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 11:39 PM
1

What does this even mean? Adults are responsible for themselves. Yeah you both agreed to get married, but that was a choice made by two individuals, they didn't fuse in to one being to make the decision. She made the choice on her own, same as him. If you want to have this situation, there should be some sort of legal agreement stating it before you get married (kind of like a prenup). The court has no business forcing people to pay for their exes. It's great that you're so on board with the ide…
/r/MensRights29/10/16 10:47 PM
1

If getting a job means she gets less free money, that's a pretty big incentive to stay unemployed.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 10:39 PM
-1

No, this is not the way it should work. If he wants to do that, and sees the merit in it, then he can go ahead and do so willingly. That doesn't mean it should be legally forced on people. Another thing to consider is how rare it is for a woman to pay alimony to a man. It almost never happens. It's not equal, it's not fair, and the courts have no business forcing people to pay for their exes anyway. If you want to have a situation where someone agrees to take care of the kids and puts their pers…
/r/MensRights29/10/16 10:33 PM
-2

I disagree. I think she likely expected to get away with it. And if that expectation wasn't there, she probably wouldn't have done it.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/16 01:50 PM
78

So say shit back to him. Call him a fat bald piece of shit or something. You don't get to dump water on people because they said mean things. And if you do it, expect water to be dumped on you.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/16 01:12 PM
0

I don't think it's satire, and I think that article is just using the term satire incorrectly. I think they're just saying that she's light-heartedly joking about it, not trying to expose how ridiculous it is.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/16 05:56 PM
2

The ones who are wound up too tight are always the ones with the weirdest fetishes.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 09:55 AM
12

I don't know shit about this, this is the first I'm hearing about it, but you're not really explaining anything. If there isn't enough money to give the vaccine to men and women, why were women chosen? Why not people of a certain age? People of a certain income? What makes it the right choice to give it to women only? For all I know there's actually a good reason. I'm not saying there isn't, but you haven't explained anything. Would appreciate if someone could explain that.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 10:22 AM
2

I'll edit the comment so people don't get the wrong idea.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 02:14 PM
–

I looked up Jo Fox on Google, and assuming it's the same person. historian specialising in the history of film and propaganda So... yeah. Edit: Not the same person.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 12:39 PM
3

It really is disturbing. I was looking for the info for you, and it appears they haven't really kept track of homelessness over the years at all.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 08:16 PM
–

According to wikipedia, Canada doesn't actually have an official measure. However when using a common measure, it's about 3% higher in the US. Pretty damn close if you ask me. The United States measures poverty, while Canada does not have an official measure (see Poverty in Canada#Measures of poverty in Canada), although Statistics Canada measures something called the Low-Income Cutoffs, the statistical agency repeatedly states that this is not a poverty measure (it is an income dispersion measu…
/r/MensRights28/08/16 08:14 PM
2

I just meant financially. Quick Google search says she's worth $9 million. I think that's enough to live comfortably. No need to be taking Johnny Depp's money.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/16 03:49 PM
2

3 top tier A-listers Cara Delevigne Top Tier A-lister What planet are you living on? Not only is she not an A-lister at all, none of these people would be top tier A-listers, and the only one who might qualify as A-list is Margot Robbie (since she was in a Scorsese film). Most people don't know who Cara Delevigne is at all, and most people probably know Amber Heard from being married to and subsequently divorcing Johnny Depp (who is a true top tier A-lister).
/r/PussyPassDenied24/08/16 07:33 AM
21

There are laws against domestic violence, go to the police and press charges. There's not even any evidence that she was abused. She says it was never about money. Do people actually buy this? If it was never about money, why didn't she go to the police and press charges against him? Sounds like she's a bitter shit head who wanted to punish him because their relationship went south, and the courts are so biased and ridiculous that they enacted revenge for her.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/08/16 11:11 PM
89

Her giving it away to charity is ridiculous. Why did she take it at all? Giving away someone else's money is not something that deserves praise. The worst part is that she's extremely successful and has tons of her own money. She shouldn't have been given any of his.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/08/16 01:36 PM
4

She was sending selfies of herself to this 16 year old student of hers that she's banging during her honeymoon. She is a grade-A bag of shit human, no matter how you look at this.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/16 05:21 AM
6

Same here. I really don't care who runs against Feminist Cowboy, I'm voting for them just to get rid of him.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 02:53 PM
12

Because focus groups hated the film, and the marketing team Sony employed were doing everything they could to turn a profit. Then the celebs who went on shows had to do so, because they signed contracts to market the film, and pissing off Sony/having the reputation of breaching contracts is a terrible thing for your career. They thought that they knew popular opinion based on the way the gamergate fiasco went in the favor of SJW's. They made a mistake, not realizing that the tide is turning. The…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/16 01:10 AM
1

I hope that's true, and I don't really have any evidence either way, since I've never been there. I do hear things about them sending TV inspectors to go in to peoples homes there, and various other weird laws on "hate speech" on the internet. Pretty sure I read a story about someone being arrested for trolling once. So I have my doubts.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/16 10:36 PM
1

Well I think this can and should be handled by school officials and parents, and that route should be extensively explored before police intervention. Maybe it was, I'm unclear on that, but the comment from the father in the article seems to suggest otherwise. However, the biggest issue I have with it is not the public arrest at school, in fact I can see how someone would view that as a good idea on many levels. For one, it scares the other bullies in to thinking they could be arrested at any ti…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/16 10:13 PM
2

Jesus Christ, how is this even a possibility in any free country? To enter someone's home and confiscate their electronics over alleged bullying? That's insanity. I really hope Brexit is an indicator of things changing over there. And a child no less.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/16 07:44 PM
5

/u/sphericalthing posted the original further down in the comments. This is the guy's channel. This is probably the video you are referring to in your reply to /u/PrimalMusk. There are a bunch more on his channel as well. The guy is definitely mentally ill.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/16 04:31 AM
–

What's the deal with people obsessing over celebrities anyway. I never understand why it's so important to take pics with them and wait for them outside restaurants and hotels. People are weird. Pretty ironic to see this comment on TMZ.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 04:29 PM
1

Idra?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/16 11:36 AM
17

She only got 2 years for getting two 14 year old's drunk and fucking them on 2 separate occasions, and then expressing no remorse for it. I highly doubt man who got two 14 year old girls drunk and banged them on two separate occasions, then expressed no remorse, and posted things about wanting to bang underage celebrity sisters in an incestuous 3-way would get such a small sentence. Seems like it's barely PPD to me.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/16 10:47 AM
22

You assume every woman One thing you always notice with feminists that really indicates their twisted way of thinking is, they always equate women with feminists. Woman = feminist to them. They are synonyms. Not all women are feminists. In fact, some polls suggest the vast majority do not consider themselves feminists in America, for instance.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 01:41 PM
38

I wonder what feminists will have to say about this one? They'll just say that it's all their hard work that made these cops take it seriously, and that she should be thanking feminists. They always take credit for anything good that happens, and blame men/the patriarchy for the bad things. It's like religion, where God gets the credit for all the good, but when the bad happens, it's Satan who's responsible. Then they'll say that, while it's good to hear that this woman is getting justice and th…
/r/MensRights29/04/16 02:46 AM
8

Yeah but when you consider safe surrender: safe alternative for the surrender of a newborn baby in specified circumstances. Under the SSB law, a parent or person with lawful custody can safely surrender a baby confidentially, and without fear of prosecution, within 72 hours of birth. That leaves the state with sole responsibility of the child. So why is it not okay for a father to terminate his parental responsibility within the same time-frame? At least in that case, there is still a parent lef…
/r/MensRights04/04/16 10:17 PM
9

Nope, it's not normal at all to say don't put your hands on me to a random stranger that you are actively jumping in front of to prevent them leaving a situation where you are saying racist things to them.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 10:05 AM
3

Would be great if you could not post this trash here. This is so painfully fake. How on earth did this even get the 3 upvotes it has? Would be great if a mod could just remove it so this shit head doesn't get any views.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 01:50 PM
–

Haha, everyone on Reddit is a young single male who would trade everything just to have a girlfriend. So true. None of them actually have beliefs or feelings. They are all just angry because they don't have the most coveted thing in the world, a woman, in their lives. One thing is for certain though, now we know you aren't one of those losers. You're one of the good normal people. But I'm sure that's not the point of comments like this.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 05:06 AM
–

Okay, that's it, something needs to be said. There are 2 comments above this that use Women instead of woman twice. And you did the exact opposite, despite having used men (not the incorrect "man") in the same sentence. Woman = 1 Person (Singular) Women = 2+ People (Plural) Man = 1 Person (Singular) Men = 2+ People (Plural) I see this all the time, and finally had to say something.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 08:28 PM
3

The rate of rape and sexual assault was 1.2 times higher for nonstudents (7.6 per 1,000) than for students (6.1 per 1,000) Source
/r/MensRights20/11/15 11:12 AM
1

It's funny because you didn't get it.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 01:38 PM
1

A reasonable argument, but I would have to disagree. It sucks that you have to see your ex living comfortably while you aren't, but it's not about her. It may seem unfair, but it's for the child. If the mother wasn't the one living with the child, she wouldn't get to live in this comfort. Some things may need to change in regards to structuring of child support, but I think it's something best left to people with an in depth knowledge of the the law. I do not feel that biological fathers should …
/r/MensRights24/10/12 01:07 PM
1

"t's called an analogy, I'm not surprised you're too stupid to understand it." Did you even read my comment? Did you just seriously use that blog as a source. Let me read you the header. "Thoughts from a happily married father on a post feminist world." However, it's helped me to understand how you can be so fervent and yet so wrong. This is where you get the all the bullshit from. Anti-feminist propaganda blogs. The fact that you would use this as a source is yet another indicator that you have…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 12:57 PM
1

I realize you feel your points are unchallenged. It doesn't seem to matter what I say. So let's just not talk anymore.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 12:38 PM
1

I would absolutely support punishment of women who misuse child support. But I would not support child support being only enough to cover the bare minimum of child care. I don't think the child should have to live in relative poverty because the parent who does not have custody doesn't want to.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 12:08 PM
1

"You're like the guy who says "Remember that $20 you gave me for xmas and then we never talked to each other after that? I took that money and I went down to McDonalds, and I bought $20 worth of fast food. And then I went back the next day, and the next day, and the day after that. And I kept buying McDonalds. And I got fat. And now I have to go to the gym and work that money off. And the gym membership is expennnnnnnnnsive. You gave me that $20 that started this whole thing off, so now you're r…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 11:57 AM
1

"I also think that men should have an option for legal paternal surrender." Says the guy who made opposite assertions not backed by sources.... " Do you understand the difference between the law as written and the law in practice?" Yeah, one is actual law, and the other is your perceived notions of unfairness and inequality. Not going to respond further, you are moron. "Then why do states routinely give custody to women but not men" I agree that custody seems to be something that is slanted in t…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 11:47 AM
1

"Well, either making things up or just simply ignorant. Mothers have the choice to abort or to bring to term." Correct. They do. "They have the choice to abandon (hospital/adoption), or keep." That is only because it came out of their body. You can abandon all the things that come out of your body too. You can also put the child up for adoption if you have custody. So, no, that is not a choice that women have and men don't. "Hell, in some states they can even name the father, whether that person…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 05:34 PM
1

"Heh, ironic." Nope, it's just accurate. It's funny because you think you've done a good job of masking your ignorance, but you really haven't. "Your opinion is in direction contradiction to reality. Unless there are extraordinary circumstances (e.g. mom's in prison), dad is going to see his kids every other weekend and every Wednesday, if he's lucky. Seriously, if you have no idea what you're talking about, then maybe you shouldn't be talking about it. " I just have to wonder who is feeding you…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 05:20 PM
1

"No, she doesn't. Child support payments are one-sided. If by chance a man gets custody (highly unlikely) he will get paid less CS equivalently and be much less likely to collect if she happens to be in arrears, and collection will be much more lenient. " This is not true. So, really I can't say much more on the matter. Unless of course you live somewhere other than North America. Which I guess is entirely possible. And the way you said "collection will be much more lenient" makes me think you j…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 05:02 PM
1

"Drawing a completely broad connection between an actual fact "women throughout history and also currently in undeveloped parts of the world give birth without all of the perks of modern medicine or the luxury of maternity leave" and nazism is by definition a straw man. It is not feminist conspicacy theory it is fist world dicsonnet is a real thing." That's not what I said. I said that it happens less in developed countries but still does. I am talking about the risks of pregnancy, even with mod…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 09:18 AM
1

"Poppycock. If mom is really so poor that she can't take care of the kids then give them to dad so he can." It's so obvious you know nothing at all form reading your comments. If mom was so poor that she couldn't take care of the kid and dad wasn't and wanted custody, dad WOULD get custody of the kid. "Or she can go on welfare. Or hey, maybe she could get off her lazy ass, get a job and work to support the kids she just had to have. If one job won't cut it, get two." So you think that the govern…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 08:53 AM
1

"OMG, how can you think that's ok when the child loses when mom doesn't get paid any money?!? With 50-50 custody dad doesn't pay the mom child support! Won't somebody think of the children?!?" It's funny because you guys can't even hide your sexist and bias at all. You have to make hyperbolic retarded statements like this. Apparently you don't understand that the reason the man is paying the woman, is because she has custody of the child. If you have custody, she pays you. The money is paid to e…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 08:42 AM
0

**"Aww, aren't you cute making poor arguments! How adorable! It is a woman's body, it is her right to choose. But she also gets to choose to give up the child. You are forgetting the multitude of choices she has. Men should have the same choices."** The only extra choice she has is whether or not the baby gets aborted. I don't understand why you can't read. I have said this before, several times. Get it through your head. You could change this, by saying you advocate men deciding what a woman sh…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 08:32 AM
-2

Are you fucking serious? Did you even read anything that I wrote. You contributed nothing because you are several steps back in the conversation. I literally have to just repeat myself to you. Wait. It doesn't even matter. You should be able to figure this out on your own. This is one of the dumbest things I have ever heard. A woman should get to decide whether or not she gets an abortion because in human reproduction, the man contributes sperm and then the woman carries the baby in her own body…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 05:40 PM
–

"First the straw man is the implication that pointing out a fact in regards to women and childbirth is equivalent of "Jew hatred" That was an example I wrote to try and help you understand why I was dismissive of your "arguments" instead of replying with counter arguments. I was saying that your arguments have no basis in reality. You ramble on about feminist conspiracies. "Don't talk about stretch marks. I'm sorry but while I can agree fully with a womans right to choose I personally find reaso…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 05:23 PM
–

"Why don't we talk about whether women should have to bring to term their biological children that they helped create by ovulating and having a man ejaculate in her, thus fertilizing her egg with sperm." You say let's talk about it and then say nothing about it. What would you like to talk about? I feel it should be a woman's choice what she does with her body. Whether she wants to carry the baby to term is entirely up to her. "Sex is not something men do TO women. Sex is something both parties …
/r/MensRights22/10/12 05:08 PM
–

There are differing amounts of support based on custody. If you have full custody, for instance, the mother will be paying you child support. However this is beside the point. We are discussing fathers who want nothing to do with the child at all. They want to parental rights at all, and don't want to pay anything either. What you are talking about, 50-50 custody, does exist, and if you have actual legal custody, the man does not pay child support to the woman.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 04:43 PM
–

"Pointing out the fact that women have, throughout history, and still do in less developed countries, given birth with far less safety than they do in the modern first world is not equivalent to building Buchenwald. That straw man wouldn't even frighten the kiddies coming round for candy this holloween." Firstly, you did not reply to the part of my comment that you quoted. Secondly there is no straw man... what are you talking about? And finally, I am saying there still are risks for pregnancy, …
/r/MensRights22/10/12 04:33 PM
–

"Honestly I'm not all that interested in debating someone with your lack of reason. You launch into personal insults when someone disagrees with your stance. This is the killer of all credibility. " Yeah.... I've said nothing unreasonable at all, and the reason I insulted you was because you were being extremely irrational and sexist. Think about if someone was spewing all kinds of shit about Jews not being humans or something. Would you consider it a challenge of your viewpoint and kindly respo…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 04:01 PM
–

"her choice? Her responsibility. That's what we're advocating." Yes, except that the child is the one who is hurt in this case. The child did not ask to be born. Children are expensive. Therefore you have to pay child support, to support the child you made. Kind of sucks that she gets to decide, but it's her body, and the alternatives are: The child suffers. Men get to decide what a woman does with her body. "The child support system, as-is, is slavery and needs to be eliminated. Even if it were…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 02:57 PM
–

You sound like such a bitter, irrational moron. Read the edit to my original comment, if that doesn't change your mind, you are hopeless and you will remain a moron forever. This isn't even a hard concept to understand.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 02:37 PM
–

Some things may need changing, I don't really know. But what I can say is that people need to stop using this argument. The man does not have to carry the baby inside him and give birth to it. This is really not the same thing at all. Edit: I can't believe this actually got downvoted. I was even nice and polite about it. People are really fucking dumb. Let me be less polite then. Carrying a child for 9 months has effects on HER body. Therefore SHE gets to decide whether or not she carries a chil…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 10:59 AM
3

I don't really have a good opinion on fathers denying parenthood, but I have to say that aborting a fetus and not being a parent are not equal. The woman also has to carry the growing fetus inside her for a long time, which makes many changes to her body and brain.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 02:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter