TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Maple_Mercury_Men Archive

View 1 post and 36 comments by Maple_Mercury_Men on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Outer Game Maple_Mercury_Men/r/seduction14/02/25 07:42 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yes! There is a difference between what laws outside the UK say, which are written ethically btw, and what the misandrist public opinion would have you believe. What you just described, is the double standard being discussed. Sexual assault is also a separate crime which does not require penetration, but still carries that double standard. Technically I have been sexually assaulted by women before, but I am not vindictive enough to press charges, unlike the women who enforce this double standard…
/r/MensRights03/03/25 08:30 PM
1

In the UK that is the definition of rape. But in some other countries, men can be considered to have raped other men, and women can rape men, provided that the victim was penetrated in some way. This means that a woman can penetrate a man with her fingers, a dildo, other objects and that get considered as rape, or you could even have a trans woman raping a man with her penis.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 06:52 PM
2

You literally need to tell yourself: “The virtue of others is directly proportional to their interest in and attraction to me”. It sounds psycho, but then you end up only giving a shit, about the stuff that go your way, and ignore the rest.
/r/seduction28/02/25 04:53 AM
1

I wish it were that easy. However, these days we need to either go above and beyond the law to avoid being falsely accused by swearing off all sexual and romantic pursuits, consensual or not, or choose to take that risk of doing legal and consensual things, that could easily be framed as a crime. In 2025, it is very easy to convict men of things they did not do. Although written statute law is fair to men, it is not applied fairly nor as written. To make a conviction, criminal law is supposed to…
/r/MensRights28/02/25 01:43 AM
1

Yes! We all have free will, and can each decide what type of man we want to be. But there are consequences to these decisions. Some of them fair, and unfortunately some of them not. For example, a fair consequence of being an Alpha, is you will become controversial, with many supporters and many haters, nothing wrong with this. However, an unfair consequence of being a lone wolf is that you could have tons of success in a business, and in dating, then 20 years later have the rug pulled from unde…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 01:53 AM
0

There are more types of men than just alphas and betas. You’ve got the benevolent leaders who have everyone’s best interests (not an Alpha) Then theres the resourceful ones, the lone wolves who don’t compete against the Alphas for what everyone else wants; they choose to want what others don’t want, and sniff out secret, niche resources (housing, food, careers and business ideas, women, date spots, travel destinations, etc) Also there’s sigmas who want what everyone else wants, but take a more q…
/r/MensRights26/02/25 05:24 PM
0

Yes they are definitely not the same thing, and the statute laws state this. But courts end up weaponizing assault laws against consensual sex. The judges are essentially Alpha males, who are weaponizing the law to interfere with the future consensual sex lives of others, and I would imagine also that during jury deliberations, 1-2 alpha jurors tend to come forth and shut down any comments mentioning the lack of evidence of the lack of consent. Don’t forget the prosecution lawyer too! While he’s…
/r/MensRights26/02/25 04:40 PM
1

Yes the laws were written by controlling, Alpha, men, in an attempt to create obstacles to prevent other men from having sex. For the same reason, you will find that most anti-cold-approach people are men.
/r/MensRights26/02/25 08:04 AM
1

Yes the laws were written by controlling, Alpha, men, in an attempt to create obstacles to prevent other men from having sex
/r/MensRights26/02/25 08:02 AM
1

I don’t think that is how the law is written, and it probably depends on the jurisdiction, but the law tends to be interpreted that way. Thing is, it’s the woman always pressing charges, so the man ends up getting charged. If men started pressing charges first when this happens, perhaps the law would be applied differently
/r/MensRights26/02/25 07:54 AM
6

Tell your parents that they will soon be introduced to many new friends ;)
/r/seduction25/02/25 07:57 PM
1

What I find has helped, is glancing around at other people in the location/venue during and immediately after the interaction! What gives me anxiety is not really fear of rejection, but the reaction of bystanders. Once I realized that nobody actually cares that you just did a cold approach, and if they do care, they probably won’t do anything about it, my anxiety went down!
/r/seduction24/02/25 04:50 PM
1

Good point! Can also start off with a 1 on 1 approach , then bring the friend into it
/r/seduction23/02/25 04:33 AM
1

You just fell for a sting operation of the talking-to-strangers-in-a-grocery-store police
/r/seduction22/02/25 03:21 AM
6

Break in to assert confidence and dominance. Then, everyone will immediately want to have sex with you, because you clearly have not given any fucks, and are saving all your fucks for them, instead of using up all your fucks to follow the law.
/r/seduction21/02/25 09:03 PM
3

Another thing I do when someone isn’t matching my energy, and it’s time to move on, is TURN away, don’t walk away. It projects a certain audacity and confidence, that walking away does not. To find a mate: Rotate. Don’t translate. What this body language implies, is that you believe, that a different woman in the immediate vicinity, will be interested, DESPITE seeing you get rejected by a different woman. This belief tends to be false, but if you show delusion that it is not false, it ends up be…
/r/seduction21/02/25 08:52 PM
1

True! Clubs are basically drunk debate clubs, where people go to argue with strangers and try to deflate their self-esteem, and nobody ends up having sex with anyone 🤣
/r/seduction21/02/25 08:43 PM
2

It depends on what you are looking for, and how small the town is. The transient “ski bum” population will make it difficult to find a life partner. Also, a town with 20k population will have more options than one with 5k
/r/seduction21/02/25 07:25 PM
1

Perhaps. He did use the word “immigration” so I think he is referring to people physically moving.
/r/seduction21/02/25 07:20 PM
1

Yes. Even if the ratio is bad, and the competition is high, you just need to be better than all the competition 🤣
/r/seduction20/02/25 11:00 PM
3

He probably is of the orientation that makes dating easier, but career harder, and STI’s more pestilential 🤣
/r/seduction20/02/25 10:13 PM
1

The best thing a friend can do is literally just show up and do nothing else. Just existing as someone who is your friend, and knows you are not a predator or a psycho, gives the social proof that you need. You can then treat your approaches as “side-quests” where your friend does not approach with you, but is seen with you, by the woman, immediately prior to the approach.
/r/seduction20/02/25 10:11 PM
5

That makes sense. However, the exception to this is that small towns that have some form of tourism or natural beauty, are good for dating. Single people move there primarily to enjoy outdoor activities, but also to meet the other singles. You can also bang the tourists LOL.
/r/seduction20/02/25 09:57 PM
1

I’m confused. The boonies are mostly dudes, therefore dudes are leaving the boonies to go abroad, and women are moving to the boonies? It seems that OPs problem, which is the problem of other farm dudes, will solve itself with time then. Are women moving to the boonies, because there are more men there and less competition from other women? I don’t think most women are horny enough to do such a thing lol
/r/seduction20/02/25 09:49 PM
0

One day is plenty long enough to drive 1.5 hours, fuck everyone’s brains out, then drive back.
/r/seduction20/02/25 09:41 PM
8

I live in a 1M city. I once changed my location to a 2M city 10 hours away, just for curiously. Somehow got quadruple the matches that I do without changing the location. So guess what I did? Road trip LOL. Is a cool city to visit in general though for exploring and attractions too, and also visited friends there. I should probably start cold-approaching at home lol, instead of random Tinder road trips.
/r/seduction20/02/25 09:38 PM
4

Agreed. Stuff happens because of what happened prior. Stuff does not happen in certain locations, just because you are at that location. Happening happens things. Relocating does not happen things.
/r/seduction20/02/25 09:14 PM
0

It's Consensual manipulation though. Women want to play this game. They want to feel attracted, and because biology is a motherfucker, they are attracted to games, not upfrontness. If you are direct about wanting sex with someone, she will think, "What a honest, good dude. He deserves to get laid so much. I really wish I could help, but unfortunately everything is completely dry downstairs. " If you want to be direct, be direct with a female friend! Tell her what you are looking for, and she wil…
/r/seduction15/02/25 09:14 PM
10

"go on a valentine" hahahaha that is goofy wording, nice. Just my opinion, but I would suggest maybe going for an AirBnB instead. Hotels have a creepy, shady, prostitutey connotations, but AirBnB tends to be more fun, silly, sexy vibes. Furthermore, many of the Airbnb's I have stayed at, the owner knows what is up, and decorates in a way that does the opposite of cockblock. I always have a better time in Airbnb's than hotels, sex or not.
/r/seduction15/02/25 09:01 PM
2

Same shit applies regardless
/r/seduction15/02/25 05:02 PM
4

The scripped must be flipt
/r/seduction15/02/25 05:00 PM
6

A better question would be, why do you need purpose, to have sex? All your ancestors for half a million years had sex without having conscious thought, or a sense of intention, so you should be able to do the same. Leave your brain at home, and let your body go out and approach women. Hopefully some women you come across have also left their brains at home, and are doing what you are doing.
/r/seduction15/02/25 03:33 AM
11

I agree. Strangely enough, it is sometimes actually better to leave your brain at home. You can also just let your body go approach hers, while your brain stays back and watches with your friends! Hopefully she also does the same.
/r/seduction14/02/25 07:45 AM
1

This is pretty addictive! I just spend 90 minutes on this LOL Only downfall of this, is that it does not always understand sarcasm
/r/seduction13/02/25 01:42 AM
2

Approach at a destination, not on a journey
/r/seduction11/02/25 08:26 PM
9

"Hey, I'm doing a survey for the Can'tGetNoD Association. Would you like to participate? It is quick and only has a couple questions" Sure, i'll bite! "1. Are you single? a) Yes b) Yes c) No, but I can do better What are your plans after this? a) Coming over to my place b) same as a, except it's called b c) all of the above "
/r/seduction11/02/25 12:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter