| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Body Shaming Circumcised Men Does NOT Help Our Cause. (video)The people who are body shaming men are the ones in favor of cutting their genitals. The amount of body shaming and ridicule being heaped on intact guys is something I am so used to by now, I just have to shrug it off. I'm mostly troubled that such attitudes serve to perpetuate further acts of forced cutting of children. Fear of ridicule is a huge driver of why people want to cut their babies. This perception by circumcised men of being shamed when given facts about the harm of genital cutting i… | /r/MensRights | 13/02/20 02:33 AM |
| 7 | Hyperbole or Justified? - "Circumcision Is Rape"It's forced mutilation, without question. The comparison to rape is that it involves penetration of the genitals with an instrument. It's the equivalent of using a metal instrument and forcing it into a baby girl's vagina and tearing open her hymen. If you don't think that should be allowed, then why can you do it to a baby boy? Saying "it's worse than rape" rather than "it's rape" emphasizes the permanence of the damage. It's arguable, as there are many levels of lasting consequences that could… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 04/02/20 12:24 AM |
| 12 | Mother shares her infant son’s horrific circumcision experience on forum posthttp://archive.ph/ijq4t | /r/MensRights | 15/12/19 07:58 PM |
| 7 | I have questions about circumcision"And most importantly, why should I take up a belief (anti-circumcision) that would logically lead me to resent my own father who I look up to?" You have this backwards. The requirement to cut the genitals of a baby boy comes from the belief system of a small minority. The vast majority of males alive today and throughout history never took up this peculiar commandment from an imaginary deity. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/19 12:35 AM |
| -2 | Male circumcision needs to be seen as barbaric and unnecessary – just like female genital mutilation.WHO and UN guidelines on FGM are unfair and absolutely biased in favor of protecting women over men. I completely agree. They are guidelines by bodies that don't actually make it illegal for a consenting woman to have any such procedure done. There are active clinics that do cosmetic labiaplasty, which fit the definition of FGM, but are legal because the patients are consenting adults. You can be a transsexual and have all your genitals cut and reconfigured and the law even encourages it if that… | /r/MensRights | 25/07/19 11:10 AM |
| -4 | Male circumcision needs to be seen as barbaric and unnecessary – just like female genital mutilation.You are mistaken. All forms of female genital mutilation are NOT illegal. A consenting adult woman has the right to have cosmetic surgery on her genitals, or if she wishes, even a clitoridectomy and no one will object. It is NON-consensual genital cutting of children that must be restricted. Get the framing right. If you say that men are not accorded the same rights as women, therefore you want equal rights for men, I understand the argument. Unfortunately, that is not a tactic that is going to … | /r/MensRights | 25/07/19 06:23 AM |
| -10 | Male circumcision needs to be seen as barbaric and unnecessary – just like female genital mutilation.There are plenty of other real men's rights issues. Divorce laws. Military conscription. etc. Child circumcision is not one of them. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/19 03:04 AM |
| -10 | Male circumcision needs to be seen as barbaric and unnecessary – just like female genital mutilation.It is not nitpicking to say it is wrong for ALL children. Saying it is especially wrong for males or females is nitpicking. If you want to end the practice, you won't accomplish that by making it about men's rights. A lot of people will not join you. You have a much better chance of making it about children's rights. Which is accurate. That's the way to fight this and win. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/19 02:37 AM |
| -15 | Male circumcision needs to be seen as barbaric and unnecessary – just like female genital mutilation.Non-consensual circumcision of children, male or female, is a child's rights issue. It has nothing to do with men's rights. An adult man can do it and no one has an ethical problem with it. The fact that it happens to MALE children where you live is not relevant. That it happens to male CHILDREN is the issue. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/19 12:15 AM |
| 1 | Foreskin reclaimers: the ‘intactivists’ fighting infant male circumcisionAllow those inclined to continue their blood rituals in the name of their religion. It should be banned only for all non religious purposes. That means no hospital procedures. Must be performed by a mohel in a ceremonial setting. Allow the religiously devout to keep doing it since it is so important to them. Maybe when their boys grow up and find themselves a small minority of anatomically incorrect adult men, they will come to their senses. But you can't force them to stop. That will only happe… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/19 05:00 PM |
| 1 | Sex is not the same after a male circumcision (euphemism for genital mutilation)😔. Attack on our masculinity start when we are young.Hardly an unbiased sample. The vast majority of intact men choose to stay that way. If an adult male chooses to get cut, they are doing it because they are already convinced in their mind it will be an improvement. | /r/MGTOW | 20/07/19 07:19 AM |
| 2 | FGM vs MGM?FGM=MGM Same thing. Non consensual cutting of children's genitals is wrong. Gender is irrelevant. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 20/07/19 07:03 AM |
| 1 | Circumcision in med schoolPlease click SHOW MORE under the video to read the uploader's description. | /r/MensRights | 13/06/19 06:07 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter