TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Markus148 Archive

View 0 posts and 42 comments by Markus148 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

“She runs a mean pick 6 play” shows how much he knows about football. Which is nothing.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 02:14 AM
8

They literally said he stole the election and called him an illegitimate president for months. What are you on about saying the validity wasn’t questioned?
/r/MensRights03/08/24 02:01 AM
1

They are driving a Skoda (rare in the U.S) in what appears to be a European spec car (driver on the right). It is likely in the UK with the driver seat being where it is and the text being in English. In Germany this is able to be prosecuted for "road rage", which maxes out around a 4000 euro fine. On the flips side taking a picture without someone's consent is also illegal in Germany, so she could get prosecuted in turn for this post if that's where it was (still betting on the UK)
/r/MensRights14/01/16 09:43 PM
1

Depends on where you are. In Germany this can be considered "Road Rage" and can be up to a 4000 euro fine. Keep in mind most people would not prosecute at just the finger. Tailgating and swerving at them or trying to force them off the road is what they want prosecuted.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 09:37 PM
7

According to the study done by the CDC, about 40%, if you want to believe it. http://i.imgur.com/eUKIiFq.jpg
/r/MensRights06/01/16 10:59 AM
1

It said $186 a week. But yeah, still pretty low to live on.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 10:07 PM
3

But in the military if you choose not to pursue it as a crime no negative actions come to the accused. There is no "expulsion" and they sure as hell don't plaster names all over the place or it forces an investigation.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 10:57 PM
21

but many mothers had to hear about their dead children. Fathers had to hear about dead children too.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:52 AM
8

Attitude reflects leadership. If the leaders are that bad then the majority are agreeing with them and that reflects what we see.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 10:33 AM
79

I'm pretty sure that every section of DoD and military has an EO program (equal opportunity). This feels like it's a blatant disregard of that, spouting male privilege. I'm sure if this was brought to go higher echelons that this could be changed.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 12:26 PM
1

Her lawyer stated she wasn't drunk but had a concussion, despite what the police reports said about them smelling alcohol on her. He stated that had the case gone to trial, he would have presented a "renowned concussion expert" who had concluded her behavior was consistent with someone who suffered a "significant head injury" rather than being drunk. "Hope was not intoxicated; she was concussed."
/r/MensRights03/10/15 02:49 PM
5

It could also potentially be slander or libel in the U.S maybe for some of the negative stuff if people do want revenge (example: ex leaving lies on review calling you an abuser)
/r/MensRights01/10/15 10:47 AM
2

I am a firm believer that fitness levels in the army are based on a stupid system. The way they measure body fat is also insanely stupid. Our fitness standards are based on scores. There are a total of 100 points that can be earned in each event with 3 events. The minimum you can score in each event is 60 points. These points and min/max are vary by age too. 17-21 year olds have a higher minimum but lower maximum for score. Example: 42 push-ups in 2 minutes is the minimum number of push-ups for …
/r/MensRights11/09/15 02:23 PM
15

Same, but combat support so we do actual combat too. We only have ones and twos per platoon. I usually tell them to let me know if I cross a line with offensive shit said. It has only happened with one so far and it was one who was assigned to our platoon but not in it. Also some of the dirtiest shit I have heard has come from some the females so it does vary person to person. I think the performance thing may be a different reason. In PT we run in groups depending on ability/speed or in formati…
/r/MensRights10/09/15 09:35 PM
1

It's an interesting article still. I would also like to know if that number was based on percentages, and how they got that number or if they just counted people they thought for the traits or what study they used to determine the diagnosis. Here are more numbers. A 2008 study using the PCL:SV found that 1.2% of a US sample scored 13 or more out of 24, indicating "potential psychopathy". The scores correlated significantly with violence, alcohol use, and lower intelligence. Journal of Consulting…
/r/MensRights03/09/15 10:09 PM
1

"lacking empathy, coldheartedness, lacking guilt, egocentricity, superficial character, manipulativeness, irresponsibility, impulsivity and antisocial behaviors such as parasitic lifestyle. Police don't lack empathy. I know many who hate outcomes of crimes and are disgusted by crimes and feel for the families that bad things happen to. That takes out coldheartedness too. There is a difference between lacking empathy and coldheartedness and jaded people. I have seen some bad things so I can make …
/r/MensRights03/09/15 04:17 PM
1

Can be used, yes. But should they be? If you saw someone get stabbed and don't talk to police, how will they catch the guy? Do you want someone who stabs people running around? The "don't snitch" mentality has done more to hurt police than anything else. People don't report crime to police. Criminals get away. Other people don't think police are doing their job because we can't catch criminals. Crime goes up due to more criminals in an area. Repeat cycle until police can't go in an area due to f…
/r/MensRights03/09/15 03:23 PM
1

Spice for that article was a book written by one man. "As Dutton develops his theory that we all possess psychopathic tendencies, he puts forward the argument that society as a whole is more psychopathic than ever: after all, psychopaths tend to be fearless, confident, charming, ruthless, and focused--qualities that are tailor-made for success in the twenty-first century. Provocative at every turn, The Wisdom of Psychopaths is a riveting adventure that reveals that it's our much-maligned dark si…
/r/MensRights03/09/15 03:11 PM
1

I would like a source for psychopaths to be drawn to LEO jobs as you claim.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 02:57 PM
1

I see this video so much and I just keep pointing out that they are talking about investigations or situations where you are read your rights. If you are advised of your rights or are sitting in an interrogation room then yeah, call a lawyer and say nothing. But don't just avoid talking to then normally or if asked a simple question. That fosters distrust. Distrust leads to hate and hate leads to the situation we have now. Community policing goes both ways.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 02:56 PM
30

One could say that... Tunnelsnakes Rule!
/r/MensRights17/08/15 06:19 PM
2

Not to mention the fact that most dads deny or do not receive child support.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 07:21 AM
1

Like food stamps for kids stuff or like a separate account? Multiple bank accounts may hurt credit scores IIRC. That would be a negative. The food stamp style card would be a large expenditure on the government to mandate what it could be used for, but much more efficient. The gray area would be things like car payments to be able to transport kids to and from places.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 07:19 AM
1

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1976377/posts If police are not legally obligated to prevent crime, neither are you. Point if clarification on this link. It states that police are not legally obligated to protect individuals. Rather they are for the public. This is to prevent police from becoming essentially bodyguards for people who feel threatened. Preventing crimes is hard without knowing individual intentions. The crime hasn't been committed, so how can they prevent the crime that you…
/r/MensRights12/07/15 09:08 AM
4

How do I know? Because it has already happened. There was a video here a few months ago of a dad being threatened with jail time (contempt of court) by the police because the 15 year old didn't want to get out of the car and go back to his mother and her boyfriend. You mean the one with the video of the mom reaching in the window and abusing her son in front of the officer who did nothing?
/r/MensRights10/07/15 04:27 PM
0

Buy it from the women for 77 cents for every dollar they paid for it to reestablishing dominance.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:47 PM
4

You cannot be tried in a court for the same crime twice. He was never tried. Only investigated. Cases get reopened all the time due to new evidence if it never went to trial.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 05:28 PM
28

She makes money off of this garbage. Of course she is happy.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 02:24 PM
1

I'm going to try to get all these into one post. That is it. You are right because we been doing wrong for a hundred years, so we should continue to do it wrong for another hundred. Funny thing is the law evolves because of new things. Guns are more common, DNA tests are out, and there are more felons than a hundred years ago. People were unhappy about it then too. But it's the best we have right now. So you think the majority agree with your murdering ass? 60% of American voters say that the go…
/r/MensRights06/04/15 12:24 PM
1

Or, and I could be mistaken on this, it's a considered Manslaughter and not murder when it's by mistake, or unintentional. For example, a person who runs a red light driving a vehicle and hits someone crossing the street could be found to intend or be reckless as to assault or criminal damage (see DPP v Newbury[4]). There is no intent to kill, and a resulting death would not be considered murder, but would be considered involuntary manslaughter. The accused's responsibility for causing death is …
/r/MensRights05/04/15 02:21 AM
1

Again you assuming I am with you that you an authority as enforcer of law. The trail by jury is the enforcer of law, you are merely a tool to investagate whether a crime has happen. We are. Hence the title of Law Enforcement Officer. First sentance of this is Police officers may use deadly force in specific circumstances when they are trying to enforce the law. Trial by jury is not an enforcer of the law. A jury trial or trial by jury is a legal proceeding in which a jury either makes a decision…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 02:13 AM
1

Pat 2/2 to this reply Now you opinion of how I sounded. Well since it was my opinion then can't be lie is bullshit. You never question me in anyway to give you this opinion. Opinion: a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge. I formed the opinion on how you conducted the argument that you still hold which is apparently people need to go to court and be determined guilty or they should not be killed or arrested. This is wrong. We only need probable caus…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 12:41 AM
1

Part 1/2 to this reply since this is as long as the last reply How is it an ad homien? An ad homien is to attack your character falsey to state that argument holds no water The point is your job is to lie. Your superioty complex is starting to show. To say I said otherwise is to lie, but what could I expect from someone who's job is it do so. I know cheap shot, but you left yourself open for it. All of those are attacks on my character and are false with no contribution to the argument other tha…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 12:41 AM
1

You have a point. I was hoping to get a little middle ground somewhere so good on us. That is why I should be allowed to defend myself without restriction, even if it is against the cops. Now don't try and lie that cops never make mistakes or kill people who are truly innocent. You have already admitted it happens. I would argue here that Compliance is key in any situation involving Police. If an officer tells you to do something and you are non-compliant, he tries to use more force. This create…
/r/MensRights04/04/15 08:42 PM
1

Not as limited as a citizen. Are you put on trail for self defense the same as citizen is? We go through training that citizens don't which allows us to have more authority than citizens. Hence having trained LE instead of local militias handle crimes. And yes, we are held the same investigation processes as citizens. Do you honestly think if an officer kills someone they go out and work the next day? It's usually handled by people like Internal Affairs and other outside investigators. Justified…
/r/MensRights04/04/15 08:42 PM
1

We are limited on our use of deadly force. But the people listed are Violent criminals or criminals who were caught in the act and turned violent or tried to flee with weapons out causing a danger to others. Some people are just violent and if they threaten more lives than their own, police are obligated to try to stop them from harming others, including themselves, at the cost of using deadly force. Which is also a law like presumption of innocence. In the United States, the use of deadly force…
/r/MensRights03/04/15 09:55 AM
2

I don't know how you got that interpretation out of my statement. I stated I don't like that the website places violent criminals alongside the innocent people that have been killed. If a violent criminal is killed in the act or after the fact while evading capture, that should not be listed alongside the innocent people killed by police. The website given does not do this. They place the criminals alongside the innocent. The site is just called "killed by police" and states every person - no ma…
/r/MensRights02/04/15 01:06 PM
2

I hate this site. I know we are talking discrimination against men in shootings, but over half of the list is violent crimes that were interrupted by police that ended with a death. If you find a list of innocent people being killed and that had a disproportionate amount of men, I feel that would have more impact. And I say this as a Law Enforcement Officer. Yes many of these people are men, but most, if not all, were criminals as well. To me, criminal outweighs every other factor involved in a …
/r/MensRights02/04/15 09:52 AM
2

My biggest issue with these types of articles is that they equate sexual assault as rape. I understand Rape is sexual assault, but sexual assault does not have to be rape. 1 in 5 is still bullshit as demonstrated by the DoJ study, but Sexual assault stats will always be higher than rape stats due to what I stated above.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 10:13 AM
2

This was on /r/thathappened !!! Do you think they lie there?!?!? This is $100% factual!
/r/MensRights26/02/15 01:38 PM
13

That one person can not provide all the income for the family is a shame all in it's own. Imagine being able to do that and then double the income because both partners do work. I am tired of working long days and nights and would love to stay at home all day and take care of my son and clean. My wife loves to work. At this time though it seems like an impossibility.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 03:25 PM
0

You never know how long drugs will stay in your system. Some people metabolize faster than others. Please go in. If possible request a blood sample be taken to test for said drugs. They may just do a drug swab but it never hurts to ask. They may take you to a hospital for it but anything helps.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 07:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter