TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Marokiii Archive

View 0 posts and 70 comments by Marokiii on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

depends on where you are sitting on the bus. many cities have rules for priority seating on public transit. seats right next to the entrances are for people with mobility issues including pregnancy. if those are full with people who need them than they radiate outwards.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/22 10:24 AM
-12

Or he was sitting in the seat designated for pregnant women, elderly or disabled people? Every bus in every city and country I haveen on have them. They are the seats closest to the entrance to the bus. So my money is on that the bus is full and he was sitting in one of the designated seats for pregnant women.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/22 07:01 AM
-5

Normally busses have 2 seats that are designated for elderly, disabled people and pregnant women. They are normally the seats closest to the entrance/exit to the bus. So chances are he was sitting in one of those designated seats.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/22 06:59 AM
5

they would not have gotten the same exact punishment in a western country... public nudity does not come with a 6 month jail sentence in countries like Germany, US, Canada, France, Sweden, UK, Japan, Australia, etc.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/21 08:42 AM
20

or just delay her incarceration. the govt is suppose to be vaccinating people by the end of summer, just hold off on putting her in jail till then or give her the vaccine now. she can take my shot if that means she can go to jail for her crimes instead of getting a fucking CURFEW for killing someone.
/r/MensRights05/03/21 04:58 PM
2

this isnt house arrest, this is a curfew. she has to be home between the hours of 9pm and 6am. im asleep for about 80% of those hours anyways(when i dont work graveyard shifts) so i would take 10x longer 'house arrest' sentence over jail time.
/r/MensRights05/03/21 04:55 PM
2

ya its ridiculous. plus chances are there are work exemptions so if she was like me and worked graveyards she would be allowed out during those hours to go to and from work. for when i worked at 7am i still went to bed at 10:30 each night so that i could get proper sleep. being home at 9 was easy.
/r/MensRights05/03/21 04:53 PM
9

most likely there is a work exception, so i would still be allowed to go to work on my regular graveyard shift and then have the day free to do whatever i want.
/r/MensRights05/03/21 04:50 PM
17

it be nice to find out what the legal requirement is for bouncers and the range of that responsibility. they are hired and paid to provide security not just to the property but also the patrons. so i would consider the entrance and line area as part of their responsibility. they completely failed in that responsibility and allowed this man to be assaulted. go find a contingency lawyer and sue the club.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/20 04:22 PM
-4

i dont know about other people. but guy or girl, if the cops outnumber you or you are just super weak and pathetic in your fighting abilities, they shouldnt hit you so hard and in a way you get dropped. there were other ways to stop her from hitting the cop and restraining her other than knocking her out. head injuries are no joke.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/20 06:20 AM
1

in legal terms, it kind of does. if i provide information, with the explicit purpose of having someone use that information to take all my money, and i make no mention of them not being allowed to keep it, than legally i cant expect them to give it back. if i give someone my house key with a note saying they can enter my house and take what ever they want from inside than i cant expect them to give it back later. i definitely cant have them charged with theft later.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/20 03:57 PM
1

where is the deception? also, its not fraud OR deceptive. they are both the same thing, one is just a legal term.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/20 03:42 PM
2

fraud /frôd/ noun wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain. i dont see any deception going on. they quite clearly state exactly what they will do and nothing more. you give them the bank details and the other person will test out if they can drain your account with it. there is no mention of giving the money back afterwards. there is no deception, so it is not fraud.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/20 03:28 PM
6

false accusations should get more punishment. people who make public false accusations of rape do far more damage to families and the overall community than someone who commits a single act of rape. when someone is falsely accused of rape they usually have very little support by the community, family or workplace. their lives are ruined with little chance of ever getting back to the way it was. at least when an actual rape happens, the victim has multiple sources of support and sympathy to help …
/r/MensRights06/10/18 08:31 PM
3

so what exactly would they be listed under on the sex offender registry? because that registry lists the crime they are convicted of. so people who make false accusations and are placed on the list will be listed under false accusations.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 08:29 PM
10

more than the 6 years, starting careers later in life significanly decreases earning potential in later years as well. plus if this guy had serious potential to go pro after college than that ship has sailed, he hasnt practiced in over 6 years, and hes too old now compared to the rest of the people he would be up against if he started from the bottom again. so his chosen future is ruined because of her. garnish her wages for life.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 03:17 PM
1

the actual problem is that if they push more men to enter fields dominated by women than the market gets saturated with people looking for work driving wages and benefits down. meanwhile since more men are looking for work in those fields there are fewer of them looking for work in labor jobs which drives the wages up.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 03:15 AM
13

nobody became a welder doing camp work for oil pipelines doing 2 weeks on 1 week off because they love living in a dorm style building sharing 1 bathroom with another 5-10 guys. we do it because it sucks so much that they pay us ridiculous amounts of money to entice us too.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 03:12 AM
36

or maybe have women more excited to be mechanics or any other skilled labor job.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 03:10 AM
3

that question is very open ended and leaves no room for explanations on why they would or would not reduce or quit their job to take care of the kids. in a married couple the man could be the main money maker in the relationship. obviously in this situation as people who understand the need for money and to also watch the kids, the wife is going to say she would do it while the man would say they wouldnt. a proper question would be something like; if your job paid less, and had less upward mobil…
/r/MensRights22/10/17 03:09 AM
12

plus sex we have is probably more fun than the kinds of sex happening on a porn set.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 03:00 AM
2

here is a simple solution for the wage gap as you describe it. if women more evenly distributed themselves among all fields of employment instead of over saturating the already over crowded fields of nursing, teaching and other fields and instead went to work in fields of work that have low unemployement rates than the wages across all fields will stabilize. the male dominated fields will start to pay less since employers will have more potential employees to try and hire at current wages or eve…
/r/MensRights22/10/17 02:53 AM
2

but you arent in a movement that is advocating for the equal treatment of you or a specific group. you are advocating for the betterment yourself or the betterment of your group. feminism keeps on saying they are for the equal treatment of women and want to be treated just as well as men are. but then they dont want to lose anything that they already have thats better. thats fine and is how most people operate, but dont call yourself something better than what you really are.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 09:24 PM
9

not once at the early beginnings of feminism or even decades after it first started did i ever see or hear about feminists fighting against the positive things that they received for being women. it has always been about getting equal treated on the big issues, taking none of the bad things and holding onto all of the good things they have.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 05:51 PM
3

except this whole thread is about living together with someone your in a relationship with and not just a random stranger who you dont interact with. so this is about situations where you have met the requirements for common law marriage. sorry if you misunderstood everything being said and took it for that the govt considers every roommate living together over 1 year as a married couple. they simple dont. so if you live with a girlfriend for over a certain amount of time, simply saying 'dont ge…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/17 04:59 PM
5

in a divorce of married couple its not just joint accounts that get divided up. its everything. lots of married people have bank accounts with only 1 persons name on them(credit cards usually only have 1 persons name on them as well), all of those accounts arent sheltered from splitting of assets of married people. for common law marriages property is also partially split up depending on where you live. lots of places divide the increase of property value since the time you started living togeth…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/17 04:49 PM
3

theres such a thing as divorce for married people. breaking a relationship with a common law partner is similar to a divorce but with out a legal requirement to file paperwork for it to happen. dividing of assets can happen though if either party decides to get a lawyer and request it.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/17 04:37 PM
8

its not simply just living together with someone that makes you common law married. you have to be in a spousal relationship with them, but you dont have to be having things like joint bank accounts to be considered common law married. the common law marriage also ends when you are no longer a couple or if you move away from each other for an extended period of time. so for past girlfriends it doesnt matter since you have broken the relationship with them.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/17 04:03 PM
5

thats what this comment thread is about though...
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/17 03:58 PM
5

they just use bots to check posting history of everyone that posts in their sub. if you have over a certain number of posts or a certain comment score in those chosen subs than you get banned from theirs.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/17 02:44 AM
15

Most people still call their adult children their kids.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 03:45 PM
1

bars and clubs dont really like the publicity they would get from one of their bouncers knocking a woman out cold, even though it would be justified. its just a headache they dont need.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/17 02:30 AM
4

Wuuuuuuurld STAAAAARRRR!!!!
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/17 05:54 AM
23

then alimony should have a set time limit to it instead of being for life or until the other person gets married again.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 04:08 AM
1

yup. with less money comes fewer judges, fewer juries, fewer bailiffs, and fewer other support staff in the courthouse. all those things means fewer cases can be heard in the same amount of time compared to a well funded justice system.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/17 11:21 PM
1

You gotta be careful still, states like Ohio will recognize a common law marriage if it was entered into in another state where common law marriage is valid. So if you are common law in NY and move to Ohio where you then separate than Ohio will recognize that union as legal.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 06:48 AM
3

still doesnt work that well anymore, many countries have a thing called common law marriages. its where you arent legally married, but in the event of a 'divorce' assets are divided up and sometimes alimony is awarded. just like regular marriages alimony is not always given but for common law marriages it has the same standards to be met. if 1 of the partners makes significantly more than the other and helped support their dual lifestyle than come split time that person will have alimony payment…
/r/MensRights29/10/16 06:29 PM
1

alimony is a good thing thats gone crazy. back when women almost never were SUPPOSE to work and just stay at home while married it did good. now that women are expected to also work and can go back to school to upgrade qualifications, alimony has gone horribly wrong. i think the only proper solution is a limited alimony for a set period of time, say 6 years. that allows a ex spouse to go back to school and enter the work force before the alimony ends. the alimony could also shrink over time so b…
/r/MensRights29/10/16 06:25 PM
1

follow up says she still has the 30 days contempt of court.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/16 03:17 AM
1

all guides i can find recommend phoning the police if the other driver is being confrontational or presents a different view of events than what you do. she is clearly confrontational and has a different view of events, so the police should be called. its also recommended to call the police if the value of the accident is above $1000. this is guaranteed to be above that so the police should be called for this reason as well.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/16 02:42 AM
1

even if he was speeding its not his fault for the accident. its always the fault of the person merging or entering traffic for causing an accident. same with it always being the fault of the person who rear ends another car, its always their fault.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/16 02:38 AM
1

ya even if he was speeding, shes still at fault because shes suppose to judge when its safe to enter. if hes speeding that its not safe and she is not suppose to enter traffic. plus he was doing 32mph, so not speeding either.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/16 02:33 AM
1

i to like to quote Ken M.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/16 02:16 AM
21

“Viewed in this larger context, having a lounge for women contributes to the promotion of gender equality.” --Schwartzman, the philosophy professor so by excluding men, we are making women equal. idiot logic.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 07:10 PM
63

personally i wouldnt group the 'can be disproved' and 'have no supporting evidence' groups together. it will inflate the number. just because theres no evidence the crime took place, does not in fact mean it never took place. it just means that if there is no evidence than there should never be any charges laid and the accused should never have their name released to the public.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 01:18 PM
1

unless its a state university, its privately owned. there are a few others that are publicly owned, but unless it has the word 'state' or has the name of the state in the title(even then there are many privately owned uni/colleges that have the sates name in the title), chances are its privately owned in the USA. edit: an example is Maryland University of Integrative Health. sounds public, but its really a private university.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 05:15 PM
1

plus i can see judges getting attacked on their record of convicting rapists if the % isnt high enough to satisfy these feminists. evidence be damned the judges will be socially and professionally punished if they dont convict enough of the 'rapists'.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 11:14 AM
2

first wave feminism achieved a bunch of great things. now we are entering the entitlement feminism phase, where they dont have much actually to fight for anymore. sure there are a few minor stuff, some more social acceptance things(but those arent things you can change politically or by protesting), but overall all the major stuff has already been accomplished. so we end up with crazy feminists fighting and being triggered over stupid shit now.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/16 07:59 AM
5

apparently my phone doesnt think homophobes is a word i mean to write.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/16 04:48 AM
29

no, no they shouldn't. feminists aren't all PhD holding powerful women who are self sufficient who can do no wrong. they are smart women, dumb women, angry, sad, tolerant and intolerant, homophones, gay, and/or any other adjective you want to use. just like the rest of us are. us calling them feminists doesnt 'validate' them, it instead criticizes their entire movement. which since now a days these idiots seem to have taken over the public image of that movement, it should be criticized harshly.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/16 04:05 AM
2

why if you are trying to look like you have been physically assaulted, would you have the person beat you up while wearing boxing gloves? stupid on so many levels.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/16 06:10 PM
3

fuck that, women can take the degrees and the huge debts that go along with them. skilled trades all the way! all the friends i went into trades with finished post sec in under a year while also spending less than $5k and then id say 90% of us got jobs in our selected field making union wages. basically no debts, graduating a good 3 years before our degree taking counterparts, jobs right away, jobs pretty much all around the world if we want to move, high wages, and best of all good exercise. i …
/r/MensRights05/06/16 05:40 PM
3

yup. mom works with a guy who injured his back doing his trades work, now works in a office job after getting a business degree at 40. i went to my 2nd level welding course and there was a guy who was 53 who had got divorced, hated his office job and wanted to build things with his hands so he was in his 2nd year of technical training after his 1 year of working as a welder. couple other guys i work with got bored with the trades they were in and went back to trades school to get certified in ot…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 01:16 AM
2

the few guys i know seem to be happier and still living comfortably. its not impossible.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 09:27 PM
6

but they arent trying to get rid of it. they want to get rid of the LIFETIME alimony payments. so if you were married for 17 years and are now 37. you shouldnt still be paying alimony to your exspouse when you are 65.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 08:39 PM
2

for a set period of time. i know many men who hate their careers and go back to school and start again from the bottom, even in their late 40s early 50s. if a women gets divorced, there is no reason she cant go to school while receiving alimony for 5-10 years and then be expected to join the workforce. divide the current assets reasonably now so that the person receiving alimony still has retirement funds.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 08:34 PM
0

is a boyfriend verbally abusive if the tells his gf that he wont stand for her keeping contact wither her exbf? because that could be considered to your isolation definition. gaslighting...im allowed to lie.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 02:32 PM
2

its not even a case of he said she said. i can admit to saying things that are verbally abusive to anyone and its not a crime. as long as its not uttering threats(like promising to do someone physical harm), and it should be protected under freedom of speech.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 01:37 PM
1

thats uttering threats, and is a crime. verbal abuse is something completely different. uttering threats is like 'dont do that or im going to come over there and punch you in the face'. verbal abuse is something like 'you are a worthless piece of crap and no one else will ever love you.'
/r/MensRights16/01/16 01:35 PM
6

so if i hurt someones feelings by intentionally saying something mean...i can go to jail for that? wheres freedom of speech gone?
/r/MensRights16/01/16 06:33 AM
41

3-4 women who get a trailer to themselves complaining to the 20 guys who share one of equal size is just laughable.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 04:17 AM
5

Sulkowicz has argued her case was badly mishandled by the school disciplinary panel after she reported in 2013 she was raped in her dorm months before. what did she expect would happen when she reports this supposed rape months after the fact with no evidence or witnesses? if you are raped then go to the cops immediately and report it, dont wait months and then go to the school disciplinary board while dragging a mattress everywhere you go.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 12:02 PM
2

did you mean when she looses? if she wins, she does not have to pay his lawyers fees.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 06:39 AM
1

not sure if serious but... [text you want to show up] (link) remove the space between the ] and (
/r/MensRights14/10/14 03:54 AM
2

you could always just do this... The URL is going to spoil it, but this is what that reminded me of:
/r/MensRights14/10/14 02:06 AM
1

its okay to tell the truth. you just really wanted a slice of cake, didnt you?
/r/MensRights14/10/14 02:05 AM
1

do a short sentence, like 2 weeks or a month(they can take all their vacation time from work). plus weekend jail costs more overall since they still have to serve the same number of days, but have increased office costs since they need to be processed and released every weekend.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 04:20 PM
3

I think 12 months is a little short, but not by much though(also depends on the case). if they didnt go to school because of a marriage/family situation then a single year from the time of divorce is insufficient to make even a dent in a post-sec education. do 2 years and most people will be half way to 2/3 of the way through a basic degree.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 07:48 AM
1

not following court orders should be one of those crimes IMO. our justice system is suppose to be the backbone of our society and defying a court order is openly thumbing your nose at it. you do that, you go to jail(although not a long sentence)
/r/MensRights29/08/13 07:44 AM
1

and they let Mr. Ryan speak without looking into his background which would have showed his lack of honesty.” He declined to elaborate. He cant complain about others not investigating someone if when asked about them, he chooses not to answer.
/r/PussyPass13/07/13 07:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter