TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MarzipanMaximum5521 Archive

View 0 posts and 8 comments by MarzipanMaximum5521 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

This isn’t about ‘moral framework’, but about civil rights. Every person has a birthright to bodily integrity, which means that they are protected from modifications to their body that happen without medical necessity or their consent. Children can’t give consent. Also, a child’s right to bodily integrity outweighs their parents’ rights to parental autonomy and religious freedom. If that principle wasn’t established, then FGM wouldn’t be criminalized. So the struggle of ending male genital mutil…
/r/MensRights17/06/26 03:21 AM
5

It is already an established principle that a child’s right to bodily integrity outweighs their parents’ right to religious freedom. Otherwise FGM wouldn’t be illegal. So cutting a boy’s sex organs is, without any doubts, a violation of bodily integrity and not protected by religious freedom.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 02:23 AM
4

Pointing out someone’s spelling mistake is embarrassing. Why do you even waist your time debating her? People like her can’t be reasoned with.
/r/MensRights17/05/26 04:55 PM
2

It’s f’d up. The law states that with the consent of the parents, boys can be circumcised for any given reason and by any given person. So there’s not even regulation in terms of safety. She also didn’t pass the law thru the regular legislative procedure, but as a fast-tracked law (something one would only do in emergency situations, where quick action is needed), so that there’s no oversight from parliamentary committees and no debates about it.
/r/MensRights08/05/26 11:44 PM
1

Well that’s the problem. Only parents can file lawsuits on behalf of their children. So after parents had their son circumcised, they’d have to file a lawsuit against themselves on behalf of their son. Obviously that’s never ever gonna happen. There’s hope that in the future men who were cut as boys after 2012, could file lawsuits challenging the law. Currently German intactivists and lawyers, are looking for such men, to strike down the law. One verdict by the constitutional court could force t…
/r/MensRights08/05/26 11:38 PM
3

In 2012 a German court ruled that non-therapeutic circumcision of minor-aged boys is physical assault. After that the German chancellor Angela Merkel pushed for a law to explicitly legalize non-therapeutic circumcision of minor-aged boys. The worst thing: This law cannot be challenged. The only person able to challenge a law is the person that is negatively affected by it, aka the minor-aged boys. However in Germany, minor-aged boys cannot challenge any laws due to being minor-aged. So boys get …
/r/MensRights08/05/26 04:45 PM
19

Totally. Even if a fake-grape accusation doesn’t lead to a man being criminally convicted, then there are still implications such as loss of job and (worst of all) loss of face in front of neighbors, friends and family. Such accusations can legitimately destroy a man’s entire life. That’s why they need to be penalized harder.
/r/MensRights07/04/26 05:30 PM
131

If feminists where even remotely smart and forward looking, then they’d condemn these fake-grape allegations. Unfortunately (for them) their misandry leads them to accept and even promote it, which might hurt men in the short term, but will have bad implications for them long term, because at some point nobody will believe actual victims.
/r/MensRights07/04/26 01:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter