TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Massive-Win1346 Archive

View 0 posts and 239 comments by Massive-Win1346 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

To be fair, in this sentence "the problem" refers to dating, not the war more generally. And the deaths of men in the war, men's fear of being drafted, and men fleeing the country have all been covered in other articles linked in that sentence. Why is dating an issue worthy of focus? "Last year, Ukraine had its lowest number of births and its second lowest number of marriages in the past 10 years, according to government data." Relationships, families, and children are needed for a country to re…
/r/MensRights13/10/25 11:41 AM
1

Yeah yeah yeah okay I'm not reading this. Keep repeating your bullshit that others have called you out for as well (and no one has stepped in to vouch for). Wish you well, you're going to need it.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 09:05 PM
1

"You claimed “they were de facto prioritizing men” and provided no evidence to back that up. The evidence shows they have consistently prioritized women." So you just haven't understood the quote you shared over and over. "After struggling to get food to the Haitian earthquake survivors who need it most, international relief agencies are now using a new distribution system that focuses on giving the food to women." They WERE providing food in Haiti, but it was not getting to people who "need it …
/r/MensRights29/08/25 08:07 PM
1

You said there was no de facto prioritization of men. I want to know how this statement specifically refutes that. And I'm distorting when you can't give an honest answer about a sentence you provided? Woof.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 07:37 PM
1

How does "After struggling to get food to the Haitian earthquake survivors who need it most" equal "it also means that relief organizers--who have a long track record of ignoring male victims--wanted to get more food to women." In that quote, where do you see evidence of this long track record? Seriously, who are they referring to when they say "survivors who need it most"? Hint: it's not just women, and the answer is in the article. Why are you deflecting? Simple question.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 07:22 PM
1

That's not my question. What does "After struggling to get food to the Haitian earthquake survivors who need it most" mean, specifically?
/r/MensRights29/08/25 06:54 PM
1

You: You ignored other sources that clearly showed "New Program For Food Aid In Haiti Targets Women... After struggling to get food to the Haitian earthquake survivors who need it most, international relief agencies are now using a new distribution system that focuses on giving the food to women... Organizers say they are giving food voucher tickets almost exclusively to women..." Ok... what do you think "After struggling to get food to the Haitian earthquake survivors who need it most" means in…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 06:03 PM
1

Good lord, dude. They didn't say men and boys because that is the default. Before they explicitly prioritized women, they were de facto prioritizing men. They were trying to help everybody, but most of their resources were going to men. This was acknowledged in the quote you kept posting. Men weren't in charge. Sure. Just nearly all people in charge were men. Got it. Thank god we have passive construction in English so you can say the systems "were designed" and we conveniently never have to ide…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 05:19 PM
1

Still sorry that the people said the bad words that hurt your feelings, and that the UN said the bad words 20 times when talking about how they were going to fix a problem. It clearly traumatized you. Incredible that I am so talented at being biased that I ignore men and women, that I'm ignoring sources that I continue to quote and discuss, and that I am not giving the fact that a situation could have had male victims if it had made victims. I want to thank you for your incredibly nuanced, balan…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 04:30 PM
1

I've mostly pulled from the sources you've shared to show they also don't agree with you or at least undermine your claims. Again, I'm sorry that people sometimes say words that hurt your feelings. I can't erase male victims in the Hudson crash, because there were not victims. Unless we're talking about the birds? No one in the Haiti situation is not a victim. It's a disaster for everyone. No one is getting enough help, period. Your source made that resoundingly clear. "Men weren't largely in ch…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 03:29 PM
1

You: As I've stated, I object to the sexism of putting women first. And that's what happened in this and other examples that you conveniently ignore. As I've stated, I'm soooo sorry they said the words you don't like 😔 You: So all men have to pay for the past actions of a few male bad actors, and can't get food assistance unless they're connected to a woman who has a food voucher. I guess? That was the case before the voucher system, when women had to be connected to a man who could fight throug…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 02:21 PM
1

You: You said the U.S. Airways flight example was bullshit, without acknowledging the many sources that show passengers putting women and children first when they were setting up the life rafts. Also you: not providing any sources or any evidence of unfair outcomes or any evidence of erasure of male victims Truly don't know what you're on about at this point with Hudson. I'm sorry people said the bad words you don't like. I've seen people say "men hold all the power." Does that make it true? No.…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 12:09 PM
1

No dude, goalposts are where they always have been; you don't understand what the fucking field is. You're complaining about an aid organization prioritizing women when there is robust evidence that women are more adversely affected by natural disasters. Other sources previously shared by both of us also show that existing aid distribution efforts weren't getting to women, so organizations changed tactics to ensure women also had access to aid. No source claimed or had proof that men do also get…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 08:53 AM
0

I'm sorry this isn't a list of meagerly sourced and poorly captioned images, but I think reading might be good for you? Newsweek article citing a 2007 landmark study showing that natural disasters tend to kill more women than men, especially in places where their social and economic status and access is lower. https://www.newsweek.com/hurricanes-kill-more-women-men-1748923#:~:text=GSDRC%20(Governance%20and%20Social%20Development,to%20a%20natural%20disaster's%20impact. The study https://citeseerx…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 02:09 AM
0

I think the use of "compete" in your title is telling. It's not about competing; it's about helping each other.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 01:13 AM
0

And some of us are interested in equal rights for men but unwilling to base our arguments in fantasy. https://www.travelersunited.org/unsung-heroes-on-the-hudson-flight-attendants-on-us-airways-1549/#:~:text=Women%20and%20children%20first%E2%80%9D!%20Eventually%20the%20evacuation,as%20the%20realization%20that%20rescue%20operations%20were The calls for women and children first came from passengers. The flight attendants were all middle-aged women and were the last to evacuate before the captain. …
/r/MensRights28/08/25 05:32 PM
1

It seems that the way this topic is discussed in this sub is divorced from reality. Infant abandonment is discussed here like a happy privilege that only women enjoy, which is utterly ridiculous. As if healthy, independent, financially stable women who endured 9 months of pregnancy and gave birth to a child are dropping their newborns off at a fire station on their way to work in morning while poor, unsuspecting men wonder where their babies are. Safe haven laws are typically pushed by anti-choi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/25 08:49 AM
2

Yeah no this largely incorrect. Laws vary from state to state, but only 4 states limit relinquishing rights to mothers. Several states also require law enforcement to check missing person reports and/or putative father registries when a baby has been turned over to safe have sites. All outlined in the short document below. https://pdba.georgetown.edu/Security/citizensecurity/eeuu/documents/safehavenall.pdf#:~:text=Safe%20haven%20laws%20generally%20allow%20the%20parent%2C,from%20prosecution%20for…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/25 06:46 AM
0

Still no, not really. The supreme court cannot make laws, formally or informally, but it can rule certain laws unconstitutional and therefore unenforceable. The Roe decision argued that certain abortion rights were protected by the constitution; the Dobbs decision argued that Roe was wrongly decided, thus overturning 60 years of legal precedent. So: When certain abortion rights were protected under Roe, were people (?) MORE susceptible (?) to arguments in favor of paper abortion? No. So why shou…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/25 06:04 AM
1

A baby only exists if both consent to that choice. Man says no, no baby. Woman says no, no baby ...well, no, not really.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/25 03:08 AM
0

Abortion was never codified into federal law, which is why the Supreme Court was able to overturn Roe.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/25 03:05 AM
1

...no they don't.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 11:47 PM
1

"Women vote based on social issues more than men who tend to vote more on things like the economy and international relations." Clinton handed a strong economy off to GWB who crashed it by removing regulations from banks. Obama built it back up again, Trump crashed it. Now we have every single alarm bell going off about the economy less than a year into Trump's second term.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 11:46 PM
1

No, you didn't.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 11:38 PM
1

The mental gymnastics required for your opinions are pretty intense. Also, where did it say the men weren't previously married?
/r/MensRights18/08/25 11:30 PM
0

How is it poorly done or irrelevant? What support do you have for your assertion?
/r/MensRights18/08/25 05:28 PM
1

"They emphasize that older men know how to manipulate better because they are older, which demonstrates a misandric pre-judgment that all men want to manipulate women and harm them..... What can you expect from an article written by a woman about men????" Can you point to text in the article that states this? It doesn't exist. You might have poor reading skills in English. If you are reading a translation, it's not accurate.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 04:59 PM
0

"If your partner tries to isolate you from other people, that's almost always a sign of controlling, toxic behavior; a discrepancy in age, or in any other form of "power" whatsoever, has nothing to do with that." ...the article outlines how these tend to be related.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 04:50 PM
0

The interviews are only with men, though. And if you read the interviews, you see these men are marrying and starting long-term relationships with women in their early 20s. You need some kind of other support to say that women in their early 20s don't want to get married when the men in this article are saying the exact opposite, over and over again. "My wife, Asia Scoon, is 33 years old and I am 60, soon to be 61. I first noticed her in 2014 from a distance." --> started a relationship when she…
/r/MensRights18/08/25 04:44 PM
-1

Did you talk about the substance of the article at all or did you just read the headline and start sharing unsupported assumptions about what you believe "normally happens"?
/r/MensRights18/08/25 04:27 PM
0

Why are you putting "man of value" in quotes in response to an article that doesn't use this term or have commentary from women on the subject? This article highlights men's perspectives.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 02:14 PM
0

Does anyone actually read the article before commenting? Most of these responses have nothing to do with what the men interviewed say about their relationships.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 02:12 PM
2

...then men also don't have sex. You want me and women to just not have sex unless they are prepared to have a baby? I don't want that.
/r/MensRights07/08/25 02:48 AM
1

If men are "abandoning their kids," they are choosing not to be a parent to the kid. What are we even talking about, here.
/r/MensRights07/08/25 02:47 AM
1

Terminating a pregnancy is in no way equal to deciding not to be the parent of a child. A woman can terminate a pregnancy; both men and women can decide to not be part of a child's life. Different things.
/r/MensRights06/08/25 12:18 AM
-3

It's on video. But enjoy defending your racist idiot.
/r/MensRights06/08/25 12:15 AM
1

Find a way to implant an embryo in a man, then. Once again, it's only the bottom line if you skip the pregnancy part.
/r/MensRights05/08/25 11:37 PM
-4

He was also the first to be physically violent, so this isn't the own you think it is unless you're racist.
/r/MensRights05/08/25 11:36 PM
1

Again there's a difference between being pregnant and being a parent. A woman might wish to become a parent but not be in a place where she can be pregnant, give birth, and recover while providing food with her body for a newborn infant. You're talking about being a parent of a child that has been born.
/r/MensRights05/08/25 08:41 PM
1

The only way they could have that equivalent right would be if the woman could transfer the pregnancy to the man's body. The pregnancy is inherently unequal.
/r/MensRights05/08/25 08:38 PM
2

After pregnancy are key words here. Women can't compel men to grow the baby inside their bodies to term. If we're skipping to after, we are overlooking a major part of lack of choice.
/r/MensRights05/08/25 05:14 PM
2

...do you have millionaire parents?
/r/MensRights05/08/25 03:49 PM
0

We're overlooking the pregnancy part here. Anyone can be a parent, but not everyone is capable of pregnancy.
/r/MensRights05/08/25 03:46 PM
-12

The man was filmed shouting racial slurs before the fight and continuously re-igniting tensions after people around him had squashed it. I don't know if arguing on behalf of a vicious racist who had multiple opportunities to walk away is the hill you want to die on. Edit: The people who raised money for this woman are probably racists themselves. But also the man slapped someone before he was hit, he grabbed the leg of a woman and dragged her down, he kept trying to fight people he hated for the…
/r/MensRights05/08/25 03:44 PM
0

1 and 2 are mutually exclusive. If pregnancy can't be terminated, there is no "unilaterally choosing to have a baby."
/r/MensRights01/08/25 12:57 AM
6

Is it crucially important to recruit more male teachers and counselors, especially in elementary and middle school. This has a huge impact on students. If he's supporting ways to make elementary schools more inclusive to male teachers, that would be HUGE. I'm a fan of volunteering as well, and I've gotten jobs, scholarships, and had doors opened to other opportunities through volunteering. Finally, it looks like he wants to address something that is constantly called out in this sub: making scho…
/r/MensRights01/08/25 12:53 AM
1

Jesus Christ dude
/r/MensRights31/07/25 06:10 PM
1

Didn't say that. Credit isn't given to just anyone today, either. But prior to 74, a female application required a male cosigner, regardless of collateral, salary, ect. The same was not true for males.
/r/MensRights31/07/25 05:45 PM
1

To recap: Commenters claim misandry is responsible for conscription, and that women as voters and political figures bear equal burden for conscription as men. I countered with facts showing conscription tends to precede women's political rights by hundreds of years. This questions whether men's misandry is to blame (rather than, say, socio-economic power imbalances). Conscription is currently required in 1/3 of countries and mandatory service is required in a handful of countries. Several countr…
/r/MensRights31/07/25 02:27 PM
-1

They do and always have but ok. (Also a weird thing to say as tens of thousands of women and children have been bombed to death in the past 2 years.) I am sorry if you have been to active combat and are traumatized by it.
/r/MensRights31/07/25 09:58 AM
1

...Ok. Ok? Hard disagree, but that's the nature of this sub. I think if the white middle class Americans of this sub would take a minute to break down homicide and violence victim rates, they would find they are much, much less likely to be victimized than Black, Native, and non-white Hispanic populations. THIS IS A TRUE, UNDENIABLE MENS RIGHTS ISSUE. Indigenous and poor populations around the world are more at risk than white people. ~Your source supports this for the US very clearly.~ 3 again.…
/r/MensRights31/07/25 12:59 AM
1

Interesting source... It isn't able to answer the question of which group actually votes more, from what I can see? For women voters to be the clear majority that politicians pander to, we would probably be able to determine that, even if a percentage of men were over-reporting their turnout. I guess I don't see the point of linking this source in particular? The original comment in this thread that makes the draft question relevant: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1md0t5w/comment/n…
/r/MensRights30/07/25 10:53 PM
3

No. Member. Of. The. Frankfurt. School. Identified. Himself. As. A. Cultural. Marxist. If you can show me one scrap of evidence that Adorno or Fromm or Horkheimer ever once for one second claimed that all members of a certain race, gender, or ethnicity are entirely oppressed by another race, gender, or ethnicity, I will concede. You won't. Because that is a stupid fucking argument falsely attributed to Frankfurt School intellectuals by modern day fascists and antisemites.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 10:34 PM
1

Fun fact: the first known citation of Cultural Marxism is from the British Union of Fascists in 1938. "The task of cultural Marxism is the preliminary Bolshevization of the mind, facilitated by the indiscriminate tolerance psychosis of liberalism inherent in social democracy and leading to its final collapse." There are Marxists who are interested in engaging in ideas of how power dynamics create and affect culture, but they do not call themselves cultural Marxists. There were no self-titled Cul…
/r/MensRights30/07/25 10:17 PM
0

Okay. You've just said antisemitism is based the flawed notion that certain demographics oppress others and that this was invented by people escaping the Holocaust? Is that... um. What?
/r/MensRights30/07/25 09:51 PM
-1

Frankfort School = Western Marxism Cultural Marxism is Nazi "Cultural Bolshevism" or "Jewish Bolshevism" by another name, and it's a conspiracy theory that specifically blames the Jewish philosophers of the Frankfort School for sneaking into the U.S. and controlling their sweet little Aryan minds. So not... Irony... Just plain old antisemitism.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 09:38 PM
-2

Holy antisemitism with the so-called "cultural Marxism" shit. Wtf.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 09:27 PM
0

Not an argument. That was a list of facts in response to conjecture. Male-only governments and voting blocs enacted conscription in all of these cases. Fact. In most cases, the time that passed between conscription beginning and women's suffrage was greater than the time passed between women's suffrage and positive changes to conscription. Seeing women as equal co-contributors to the legal problem of conscription in light of these facts is illogical.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 09:07 PM
-1

Men could have just offered these responsibilities to women as well to reduce their own burden? Instead, suffrage was often a bloody, decades-long fight in many countries. Are you happy to have responsibilities in your life? Do they make you feel like a real person with agency? Would you like those responsibilities taken away and put into others' hands exclusively? I very much doubt that.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 08:59 PM
3

In ways is this relevant to OP?
/r/MensRights30/07/25 08:52 PM
0

From my understanding, there is mandatory conscription which is equal to draft registration in the US. Men in the US still have to register for the draft (conscription), but they aren't called to serve unless there is a draft, which hasn't happened since the Vietnam War. A handful of countries like Taiwan and South Korea have mandatory service for males only. Others, like Israel, Denmark, and North Korea have mandatory service for both genders. Women are the slightly larger voting bloc in the US…
/r/MensRights30/07/25 08:48 PM
4

What a fuckin' take from some guy in 2025 with the time and luxury to scroll through reddit. Fear is an emotion; anger is an emotion; grief is an emotion. If one is not "suffering from" (aka dealing with those emotions constructively), they are taking them out on others.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 08:41 PM
4

Yoooo, so well said!
/r/MensRights30/07/25 08:36 PM
6

Not in the replies on that post, tho...
/r/MensRights30/07/25 08:35 PM
1

Just looking at a handful of countries as examples here, starting with the US and then alphabetically if I could very easily find the dates for them. In the US, conscription started half a century before women had the right to vote, and men were the vast majority of voters until ten years after the last draft. Conscription preceded women's voting rights in Canada for hundreds of years and hasn't been practiced since 1945 (20 years after suffrage). Conscription preceded women's voting rights in D…
/r/MensRights30/07/25 08:28 PM
-1

Yes, by a small margin, and this majority started about a decade after the last time the USA had a draft. I can't find any sources that support that more women vote globally or in countries with male-only mandatory military service.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 07:20 PM
1

Got a source for that? I can't find one.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 06:17 PM
-1

No one said "most men kill women" at all, and no source can "prove" that most femicide is due to misogyny. However, there are many, many datasets that show misogyny is a common factor in homicides of females. I know you won't actually look at any of these, but I hope it prompts you to do the same for studies about misandry-motivated killings? Booklet_5.pdf https://share.google/d9IykkjMpRCYE8o0r A Common Trait Among Mass Killers: Hatred Toward Women - The New York Times https://share.google/lTg5b…
/r/MensRights30/07/25 05:45 PM
-5

Literally the request you made in your post, but ok. If you feel okay making statements you can't support with facts, that's on you.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 05:20 PM
-5

But really, how are men killing other men out of hatred for men? Aren't you looking for data-supported arguments?
/r/MensRights30/07/25 05:04 PM
2

I can't find any sources that say there are more women than men voters? Everything I see shows it's roughly equal.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 04:16 PM
-4

30 countries in the world have mandatory military service, and several of them require men and women to serve. Fewer than 1/3 of countries globally have mandatory conscription, and several of those are not gender-based or not active during peace time. I cannot find any source that shows the majority of voters are women. Globally, women hold a quarter of parliamentary seats, and only a few countries have gender parity in government. Also, from a BBC article: "In a 2016 Rasmussen Reports poll, 61%…
/r/MensRights30/07/25 04:03 PM
-9

Not all murders of women are due to misogyny, and not all murders of men are due to misandry. However, most homicide perpetrators in both cases are male. It's hard to argue that men kill other men due to misandry.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 03:48 PM
1

Yeah but you did learn your first language by just living because it's a natural human function, just like sex.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 04:28 PM
2

Certainly, focusing as hard as you are on being a virgin is not desirable. Do you enjoy dating? Getting to know people romantically? Kissing? If so, can you focus on your enjoyment of those things? 21 is completely normal, and the teens that are sexually active aren't having amazing sex. If you're worried about not being a stud the first time, remember that most 21 year olds aren't. If you want to date, date! Take things slow, get to know the person, make out, fool around. Don't ask about your d…
/r/MensRights15/07/25 04:24 PM
2

Lol, got 'em.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 04:13 PM
-1

Ok cool I guess
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/25 09:30 PM
1

I'll just copy/paste from my previous comment, I guess: If you had read the paper you would have read the parts in which they cite multiple sources that confirm false allegations exist and cause injury to men. "You can argue about how much of it exists, what constitutes a culture, how well reported it is, or not." That's literally what the paper does. The paper cites stats showing that men are more frequently victims of sexual assault than they are victims of false allegations, but that false al…
/r/MensRights09/07/25 02:43 PM
1

We (the researchers) found (past tense, reached results after conducting grounded text analysis) that MRAs construct (create) a culture of false rape allegations. I (reddit commenter) find (...tend to think?) X imagines (?) Y <-meaningless The researchers are not accusing MRAs of imagining something. One can create a false narrative based on real events. For example, there are real floods in Texas. After scrolling Twitter, I found that some people are blaming Trump voters for the flood. They are…
/r/MensRights08/07/25 04:04 PM
1

Why the fuck would you say "I find that X imagines Y"? You find that someone imagines something? Edit: Also just check the wild audacity of accusing me of poor reading comprehension when you can't bother to read the article. The pride you take in your willful ignorance is... really special.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 03:43 PM
1

You mean like the hard data they include on male sexual assault victims? You're calling male sexual assault victims make-believe? MY GOD!
/r/MensRights08/07/25 02:31 PM
1

Are you referring to the direct quotes from this sub that appear in the article? If so, I agree!
/r/MensRights08/07/25 02:28 PM
1

"Implies that the men are not injured." No, it doesn't. Try reading the article? "That implies that either false rape allegations don't happen" They cite stats that confirm false allegations happen, so no, it doesn't. "or aren't culture (whatever that means), that MRAs claim them to be culture (whatever that means) and that this claim is specific to MRA's. Are any of these ideas examined by the paper?" It's just so funny that the answers to these questions are found pretty early on in the articl…
/r/MensRights08/07/25 02:27 PM
1

It's literally full of comments from this sub. It's like reading this sub. You will find comments like yours in the article. Nevermind.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 02:17 PM
1

Oh, that's embarrassing
/r/MensRights08/07/25 02:16 PM
1

Lol read the article. You'll find this argument represented.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 02:11 PM
1

Sorry, are you really trying to tell me that the 25% quote relates to the 100% of case studies in the document? 25 = 100 now? Come on, bud. As for my vicious attack on the author... his writing is barely coherent. He never explains how he reaches 40%. There's nothing to grasp onto in the article. Even his bio is barely coherent! How is he an adjunct in Mississippi while living in England? The reference to race science? You really want to defend HIM?
/r/MensRights08/07/25 02:09 PM
1

To sum up, yes, of course I am a retard because I questioned whether I need to have comparative statistics -- hard numbers, here -- in order to know if croissants are part of French food culture or rice is part of Japanese food culture or beer is part of German food culture. My god, how else could we possibly, possibly know anything that is not expressed numerically? You are smart, I am a retard. And since you loooooove math so fucking much, I thought you'd be able to detect the 12 peer reviewed…
/r/MensRights08/07/25 02:03 PM
0

I'm not claiming that only one side suffers, either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/25 12:03 PM
0

I'm not saying that is the case, I'm just questioning the extent to which someone can be responsible for another person's actions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/25 08:56 AM
0

This is why I love the sky-high level of discourse on this sub. Someone posts an article, then people dismiss it without reading it, make excuses for not reading it, spout a bunch of unsupported bullshit ideas with vague references to "CDC surveys," call themselves logical and facts-based and stats-driven while dismissing others as "emotional." And then they engage in emotional name-calling, say how much they "hate" shit and how "tired" they are when interacting with "retarded" people who do rea…
/r/MensRights08/07/25 08:23 AM
1

Got any CDC reports from the last 10 years? The 25% estimation in the DNA is being badly taken out of context. It is referring to all violent crimes where DNA testing was refused or otherwise not done before or during the trial. This is a text about DNA evidence proving the innocence of men who had been incarcerated for crines, and in several cases the victims were killed or were children (i.e., not cases of a woman accusing a man to destroy his life). It does not prove that 25% of men accused o…
/r/MensRights08/07/25 02:13 AM
2

Oh damn. Honestly, women should just stop having kids.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/25 01:25 AM
0

The paper didn't say reported. Also, you just said "not including reported on a research survey" (and so did I in a comment above), so I think we do use 'reported' for both purposes.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 01:23 AM
6

Hm, how open would you be to the idea that a substantial number of female suicides or attempts are due to male psychological abuse and manipulation?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/25 01:00 AM
0

The paper mentions 5%, not 2-8%. The 2-8% you saw way probably from a quote pulled from this sub and used in the article.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 12:36 AM
0

Also very funny that your comment looks a lot like one discussed in the article! "To demonstrate the scope of their injury, MRAs frequently skewed the prevalence of false allegations of sexual assault. Despite the fact that research indicates false allegations are extremely rare (Ferguson & Malouff, 2016), MRAs presented them as a frequent and concerted political attack on men. One way that they did this was by spinning statistics. Some cases of spinning statistics simply entailed MRAs mentionin…
/r/MensRights08/07/25 12:32 AM
2

"...NISVS data indicate that 8% of American men are sexually assaulted at some point during their adult lives (Leemis et al., 2022) and a meta-analysis of available research indicates that only 5% of sexual assault allegations are found to be false (Ferguson & Malouff, 2016). The difference between 8% of men in the general American population and the number of men adversely affected by 5% of reported sexual assaults is so vast that it is logical to conclude that men’s risk of being sexually assa…
/r/MensRights08/07/25 12:25 AM
0

The frequency of discussions is based on other sources in the scope of the literature (pasted below), not the current study. You're right that it would have been insane of them to limit their search to these terms and make that conclusion though. "When MRAs first broke away from the early men’s liberation movement, one of their core grievances was father’s rights, particularly as they pertain to custody and child support; however, contemporary MRA grievances have shifted from the familial to the…
/r/MensRights08/07/25 12:21 AM
1

"I am sure no one who has met me has ever had that idea." Saying that does not create that idea in other people's minds or propose that as an idea that exists in the world. I've never thought it of myself. I am denying that anyone has ever held that idea. Edit: Also, woah, holy cow -- arguing that God doesn't exist is so, so not the same as arguing that religion doesn't exist. Adding that quote is not asserting it is true, but it is very basically engaging with the OP -- something very few comme…
/r/MensRights08/07/25 12:15 AM
-2

Huh? Paper: "Despite statistical evidence that men are more likely to be sexually assaulted than wrongfully accused of assault, false rape allegations are the most frequently discussed topic on MRA forums and websites" Comment: "Also, what do they mean by "wrongfully accused of assault"? If they mean OFFICIALLY accused, then they are only counting some of the false allegations." Me: Not all men who are sexually assaulted will report their assaults, either to police or in surveys, either. Both st…
/r/MensRights07/07/25 11:56 PM
-1

"If you let people define culture by feelings instead of statistical reality then you get a bullshit stew of chaos." Thanks, I'll make sure to get some stats on croissant sales in Paris before I try to assume there is such a thing as French food culture. "For example if one rape occurred on a campus and then there was suddenly a rape culture 'exists' then it shows that people are taking anecdotes to define culture." No one is saying rape culture exists as an isolated case of violence, so this is…
/r/MensRights07/07/25 11:34 PM
1

Well, you can deny the existence of an idea. Example: no one thinks I'm the strongest man who has ever lived. I am sure no one who has met me has ever had that idea. I deny the existence of that idea. People in this sub deny that rape culture is a function of our society, but they do not deny that 'rape culture' exists as a concept. In fact, this paper suggests that people in this sub have similarly created the reverse concept of a 'false allegation culture.' "...we found that MRAs construct a c…
/r/MensRights07/07/25 11:12 PM
3

What notion are we refuting, exactly?
/r/MensRights07/07/25 10:27 PM
-2

The paper isn't about proving the existence of rape culture. It's just analyzing common narratives used in this sub to either deny that it exists or to assert that men are under attack.
/r/MensRights07/07/25 10:25 PM
-1

Huh. I've never once seen a culture defined numerically. Can you define any culture you're part of numerically? Anyway, here are their numbers: According to data from the CDC’s National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS), approximately 20% of American women and 8% of American men experience some form of sexual violence (i.e., rape, being made to penetrate someone else, sexual coercion, and/or unwanted sexual contact) at some point in their adult lives (Leemis et al., 2022). Desp…
/r/MensRights07/07/25 10:06 PM
-2

Both the number of men sexually assaulted and the number of men falsely accused of rape would have to be reported in some way to make a comparative statistical evidence, so... What is your point, exactly?
/r/MensRights07/07/25 09:38 PM
-2

You would need the term "rape culture" expressed in numbers? What does that mean?
/r/MensRights07/07/25 09:26 PM
1

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13635785/British-tourist-43-sexually-assaulted-male-air-steward-grabbing-buttocks-nipples-restrained-passengers-arrested-landing-Palma.html That's about all I could find, thought. Searched for cases of men being groped or sexually assaulted by men or women, but it was just a million cases of the reverse. But to the previous poster's point, he's saying men are punished harder for nudity, but more of women's bodies are considered nude than men's, so the har…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 11:15 PM
2

Around mid 1940s-late 60s, lot of international sporting events for decades required gyno exams and "nude parades" in which female athletes had to walk, squat, and jump in front of a panel of doctors who were specifically focused on their genitalia.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 10:32 PM
1

"I still addressed your points." Show me a single time you addressed ANY point I have raised, including the COMPLETELY FABRICATED QUOTE you are passing off as the verbatim words of the author. Shame on you. "This study actually does investigate whether the gap in research on misogynist vs misandrist comments is supported by their analysis, and they find it is not. The study, in its own words - (Pg. 7, last point under We can hence conclude that). Also proof you've not read the paper." YOU DO NOT…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 10:23 PM
0

"Every claim in the post is either directly quoted or faithfully paraphrased from the paper." This is not at all true and you have done absolutely nothing to rebut any of my valid criticisms. Your summary includes material in quotes that cannot be found in the paper. That is disgusting. Your summary includes conclusions that cannot be reached from its analyses. That is disgusting. You have not read the paper. That is clear from your summary and your responses to the other comments. I will never …
/r/MensRights03/07/25 08:50 PM
0

Jesus Christ! Read. The. Study. That. You. Posted. It is so thoroughly explained in the text of the paper you can't bring yourself to read!
/r/MensRights03/07/25 06:06 PM
1

I swear, no one in this sub can read! It's embarrassing!
/r/MensRights03/07/25 06:05 PM
0

Okay you think what you generated was a summary? Edit: An April 2025 study... challenges the narrative that misandry is insignificant or nonexistent by analyzing gendered hate speech in four Reddit communities... --> can you point to a place in the study where the authors assume people view misandry as non-existent? They don't, so this is not summarizing the study. “Although misogyny has been widely studied in social computing, misandry remains significantly underexplored. Our study identifies m…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 05:58 PM
1

It's not about academic standards. It is about bothering to actually read, ensure you understand what you've read, and ensure that you present the information accurately for others. When using AI to summarize, take the time to challenge and refine the first thing that it generates, ensuring you do not add your own bias. Here's a summary, but at this point I don't think you are able to determine whether it is more accurate. In an April 2025 study, "Women who hate men: a comparative analysis acros…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 05:10 PM
1

Still not going to read? Sigh. Okay. "Remember guys, they included r / incels (digging deep into the now-banned sub, which has been banned for years)," Remember guys, they chose two active and two banned subs on which to train their language models in order to run comparative statistical models. "and they deliberately left out stuff like r / twoxchromosomes and similar (available and running)," ...they chose two current subs of roughly the same size and two banned subs of roughly the same size a…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 10:16 AM
0

I'm not arguing with the findings of the study here. Just the quality of the AI summary. (Although it is curious that 0 examples of what was coded in the models were included, or that there was no detailed discussion of limitations of the models themselves beyond irony and sarcasm, or that any differences in how misandry and misogyny are expressed were explored, or any discussion of accuracy of information shared in communities was considered. The statistical analyses of the models' coding and o…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 09:18 AM
0

This summary contains some pretty glaring issues. "Our experimental evaluation shows that no systematic differences can be observed when a double perspective, both male-to-female and female-to-male, is adopted, thus suggesting that gendered hate speech is not exacerbated by the perpetrators’ gender, indeed being a common factor of noxious communities." This AI summary appears to be interpreting graphics rather than summarizing the text of the study?
/r/MensRights03/07/25 04:23 AM
1

r / GenderCritical was the counterbalance for this as a banned sub on the misandrist side. Please read before jumping to spread allegations that are easily disproved in the article.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 04:03 AM
2

OP: "But are women given more slack on this?" ...Obviously no, then? As more of women's bodies are considered naked/nude when unclothed, they are not given more slack. A quick search shows women getting arrested for being topless; one could assume that they would also have been arrested for exposing their genitals in this situation. https://www.palmbeachdailynews.com/story/news/crime/2024/08/19/palm-beach-police-topless-woman-said-it-was-constitutional-right/74859216007/ https://www.npr.org/2019…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 03:53 AM
2

Michelangelo's David considered one of the greatest and most beautiful pieces of art in the world. The Discus Thrower, The Thinker, the many famous statues of Jesus, The Persian Warrior, The Sistine Chapel ceiling, The Vitruvian Man... Much of the most celebrated and influential art in human history has been dedicated to capturing the beauty of the male form.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 03:07 AM
1

The test for whether a body part is "nude" or "sexual" is determined by other people's actions? If someone non-consensually rubs a man's nipples in an attempt to either sexually arouse the man or to gain his/her own sexual satisfaction, is that not sexual assault? If toplessness is not equal between genders, your premise is flawed from the start. I think you're just talking about exposing genitals?
/r/MensRights03/07/25 02:52 AM
2

Yeah, the premise of this post is questionable.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 09:52 PM
2

"Does it suck that most women aren’t competent enough or skilled enough to hold down the kind of job that would allow for their partner to stay home?" ...jfc
/r/MensRights24/06/25 10:46 PM
1

Do you and your wife have kids?
/r/MensRights24/06/25 10:44 PM
1

I used Google and didn't type "-ai" in my search, so it was automatically populated at the top of the page. But um, we are talking about accepted definitions of terms that are frequently misused, so it's not so much that I need to think than it is find external sources.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/25 08:07 PM
1

Yeah, it's not a great moniker. Handy AI description: "Emotional labor in marriage refers to the invisible work and emotional effort involved in managing a household, relationships, and emotions, often going unappreciated or unacknowledged. This can include tasks like planning, managing schedules, communicating with others, and processing everyone else's emotions, all while managing one's own feelings. An unequal distribution of emotional labor can lead to resentment, stress, and discord in a ma…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/25 02:56 PM
3

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/4182 This bill has been introduced year after year after year. Call your reps and tell them you want it passed!
/r/MensRights13/06/25 05:03 AM
-12

Interesting that you thought the divorce sounded amicable when one person left the other for another woman. It was horrible for my mom, but I don't even think she brought up my dad's (sadly well-established) history of cheating in the divorce proceedings. "So, going back to my original argument, a divorce court can not judge on the accusations of "Rape" or "Abuse" but they are often stretched thin and so simply take the approach of "Well women would NEVER lie about something as serious as rape o…
/r/MensRights13/06/25 02:29 AM
1

It's a shame that phrases get picked up and misused until they are meaningless and become a hand grenade to win a fight. "Emotional labor" =/= "empathizing" It's the mental workload that someone takes on to make things easier for everyone. I think of when my mom was overwhelmed or sick, my dad would offer to take a responsibility off of her hands, like grocery shopping. But he honestly didn't get that expecting her to have a list ready for him in those cases meant that he wasn't really taking on…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/25 11:30 PM
-20

Weird, I thought rape accusations would be tried in criminal court? But judges are saying "sorry you were raped; here, have the house?" Seems... not... right? My dad divorced my mom, and she got the house. But he left her to be with someone else, so he had an apartment for maybe 6 months before buying a house with his new fiance. My mom also did the lions share of raising the kids, so no one in our family (including my dad) thought it was a good idea for us to live with him and have my mom move …
/r/MensRights12/06/25 10:46 PM
1

I wish people talked about this more: toxic masculinity hurts men. If I ingest something toxic, I'm the one that gets hurt -- not the people around me.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 10:15 PM
-24

How does a false claim of rape and harassment lead to homeownership?
/r/MensRights12/06/25 10:04 PM
1

Are people calling people incels on this sub? I think that the mindset aspect of it is what moves it out of the sexual harassment zone for me.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 03:56 PM
1

You are the one who jumped into a comment thread discussing something you don't actually know or care (or care to ever learn) about in order to lay out your assumptions based exclusively on the gender of the person being discussed? Then, after proving you have zero knowledge of what you are commenting on, you take offense to being called the name you don't care enough to about to change? Seeing a real pattern of behavior here despite my narrow worldview.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 10:25 AM
1

I get that it's childish, but if you do ever catch up on Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg's jurisprudence -- oh, wait, you're not interested in believing what she's said (whatever the fuck that means). Hm, how about if you ever become interested in the pattern of behavior that constituted her legal strategy as a young lawyer (who was simultaneously caring for her husband as he undergoing testicular cancer treatment), you'll also be embarrassed by what you've just said. Name calling is j…
/r/MensRights04/06/25 09:02 AM
0

Username checks out, holy shit.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 05:48 AM
1

Bro are you serious? You had me read that comment three times! No you did not. It was implied in the first comment for people with some background knowledge of these groups. Seems like you wandered over just to bug me and either didn't have or didn't bother to apply background knowledge. Then I walked you through who the specific group of conservative men were through those "20 questions." Even you were able to come up with "trad cons/religious cons." Congrats! Finally, I completely spelled it o…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 10:05 PM
1

You: The crucial difference here is "THIS group of lesbian feminists" vs "heterosexual men." I defined who the group of het cons men are in this example (cons leaders in Reagan's cabinet), and I already clarified that I am not talking about all cons or all het men. Two specific groups in a clearly-defined context. You: It's not that it's a choice of empathy OR ideology and you're position is that of the two, it's ideology. I did not introduce the idea of "human decency," OP did. If human decency…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 08:56 PM
1

You: Okay but he didn't say that ALL lesbian feminists were doing this. Or that the only people involved were lesbian feminists. Nope, but we were referring to the same group of allies who are both lesbians and feminists. OP: Absolutely - many lesbian feminists were incredible allies during the AIDS crisis. That (these specific lesbian feminists' allyship) was about human decency, not ideology. But their (these specific lesbian feminists') kindness doesn’t mean the ideology of feminism prioritiz…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 07:24 PM
1

Ah, sounds like a dialectal difference between us. "As I recall" is usually used in my dialect to mean "I am currently going off of my memory." I would have said "I recalled it correctly." OP asked for examples of feminists supporting men. I proposed lesbian feminists' support of gay men as an example of feminism supporting men. (It doesn't matter whether you agree or disagree with the statement, that is what I asserted.) OP agreed that lesbians were allies to gay men but said my example was an …
/r/MensRights03/06/25 05:44 PM
1

You don't have to recall. The text is right here.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 05:19 PM
1

If you honestly believe what you said here at the end after re-reading my post, you are deeply, deeply stupid. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1l1ehoa/comment/mvqkno0/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/MensRights03/06/25 05:02 PM
1

I'm not reading all that. Broad brush: We are accepting that gay men were dying of AIDS without pointing out that not ALL gay men were dying of AIDS. We are accepting that feminist lesbians were allies to gay men without pointing out that not ALL feminists or lesbians were allies to ALL gay men. And if you expect me to forget all of the "90% of feminists think men are monstrous" bullshit just because it's another thread, that's fucking insane. But oh no oh no straight men are involved so now we …
/r/MensRights03/06/25 04:28 PM
1

Agreed. And the trad cons/religious conservatives in the 1980s who held positions of power at higher levels of government (in the US, I'd say federal and state level leaders) were almost entirely: Male or female? Gay or straight? The point is that we are very comfortable painting feminists or gay men or lesbians with a broad brush, but when it comes to straight men, we suddenly need a list of every single person who was involved. At least in the US, government institutions that dragged their fee…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 03:49 PM
1

How about in the case of the gay community that was being disproportionally being impacted by the AIDS crisis in the 80s?
/r/MensRights03/06/25 03:08 PM
0

In a society, when violations of men's rights are perpetuated through the legal system, inadequate attention/research/funding, and unequal access to healthcare and other resources, who do activist groups fight against to enact needed change?
/r/MensRights03/06/25 02:43 PM
-1

Who were the feminists fighting against on behalf of gay men dying of AIDS?
/r/MensRights03/06/25 02:30 PM
1

Here we go! Together, by both sharing different lenses through which different groups of feminists would agree or disagree or not know what to make of some of this crazy shit, we've proved this 90% business you've been talking about is unsubstantiated. I agree that it's hard to understand what this all means, and it's because it was written by a clinically insane, murderous person. I agree that some feminists agree with her, or at least they agree with their interpretation of this nonsense. Seem…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 12:53 PM
1

My confusion was about the specific rape joke you made, actually. I thought that you were referring to something that someone relevant to what we were talking about had said. I thought my specific questions in my response made that clear. It was out of left field. Once you explained that you were just referring to the allegation that rape jokes are purportedly part of rape culture, I said "Ah, I see."
/r/MensRights03/06/25 12:39 PM
1

"He has done a brilliant job of convincing millions of women that men are women and women are men." Wow, feminists say that? "The male claim that females find fulfillment through motherhood and sexuality reflects what males think they'd find fulfilling if they were female." Feminists include mothers who view birth and motherhood as the acme of feminine power (existing outside of the realm of patriarchy), so this would be a compliment to men. "The characterisation of the patriarchy as afraid of w…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 12:05 PM
1

You have repeatedly called me a liar and shot down arguments by simply saying "I don't believe you." Now, I'm using quotation marks around words you have actually said (several times). You're not doing the same for me. Now then. "Your point about a man published it therefore it cannot be misandrist is assinine." I never made such a point. To go back: "Ah fuck you're right. I forgot about how he went around holding a gun to the head of all the feminists who purchased the manifesto..." You equated…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 11:55 AM
1

Direct from the manifesto: "Being an incomplete female, the male spends his life attempting to complete himself, to become female. He attempts to do this by constantly seeking out, fraternizing with and trying to live through an fuse with the female, and by claiming as his own all female characteristics..." "It should be said, though, that the male has one glaring area of superiority over the female -- public relations. (He has done a brilliant job of convincing millions of women that men are wo…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 11:37 AM
1

"You know I wasn't saying that a man is responsible for Solanas or for how people interpreted her views." This argument is "I have black friends" only worse. Oof, this is your most egregious false comparison yet. I think we've squeezed at the blood we could from this stone.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 11:22 AM
1

"They think making a rape joke causes a rape to occur." This is untrue. Jokes about prison rape do not force men to be raped in prison. They do help of create a culture of permissiveness in which these crimes are not taken seriously by society, victims have limited paths to justice, and perpetrators are able to continue violating even more victims. 3 bullet points are not 90% of SCUM, and you haven't proved that these three bullet points are central to "ALL feminist discourse." These kind of exa…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 11:08 AM
1

You probably don't want it, but... my advice to you is to stick with fact-based arguments. "Ah fuck you're right. I forgot about how he went around holding a gun to the head of all the feminists who purchased the manifesto..." You know I wasn't saying that a man is responsible for Solanas or for how people interpreted her views. But I do think that the fact the person who chose to make it widely available in the first place was a man shows that the mainstream interpretation of SCUM was not that …
/r/MensRights03/06/25 11:00 AM
1

Ah, I see. I think you are misrepresenting honest discourse on rape culture, but that's a sidetrack. I'm interested in a fact-based discussion. Seems like you're saying feminists believe 90% of SCUM is "true and valid," which is categorically untrue and unsupportable. Also, people who tell rape jokes are not asserting that the jokes are 90% "true and valid," so you're making a false equivalence at best. Anyway, have a good day.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 10:42 AM
1

My response was clear that these changes were made to the FBI's definitions of rape. I offered an example of what OP asked for: a group of feminists who took action and persisted for years to promote gender equality in a way that also promoted men's rights. This was a fitting example for the prompt. I clearly positioned this in the context of the US and did not make claims that it had a global impact or what feminists cannot be problematic. I'm sorry that the definition has not expanded in your …
/r/MensRights03/06/25 10:30 AM
1

You: "Nuh uh. Feminist begged and scraped for even a crumb of association with Solanas even in the face of her absoloute vitriol." Can you show where I said this? Is it the acid-throwing example? SCUM was included in the anthology without Solanas's permission, so no begging or scraping for association there. As we've been chatting about elsewhere, her work was 1. Disseminated most widely by the man who chose to publish it and 2. largely spread by people who treated it as a satire or thought expe…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 10:11 AM
0

I don't get the joke bit. Is this a published example from one of the Solanas supporters we're talking about? I'm just interested in fact-based arguments, but this seems like wild speculation.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 10:01 AM
0

The fact that men were excluded from the FBIs definition of rape victims is repeatedly cited in this sub quite rightly as an example of institutional bias against men. This change also expanded the definition of who can commit rape to include women. Seems like the reframe is that they are motivated by a hatred of sexual violence rather than (or perhaps more than) they are motivated by a hatred of men. And their feminist hatred of sexual violence became a way for some male victims of sexual viole…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 09:58 AM
1

This reply didn't really make sense. So yeah I guess I'll cope with that.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 09:39 AM
1

That's just it. Feminists who embraced SCUM read it as a satire, a provocation, and a thought experiment, but not as a manifesto. That's why Solanas hated all of the feminists who promoted her work as a satire and threatened to kill so many of them. They, like my teacher, encouraged people to read a provocative piece of writing to spur their thinking. They wanted feminists to kill men as much as my teacher wanted my class to eat babies.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 09:38 AM
1

You're calling me a liar while repeating the facts I've stated. At least spell her name correctly while pretending to be an expert on her.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 09:26 AM
1

Okay, hi. Feminism is, by definition, a ideology that advocates for gender equality and empowerment. I'm saying this post is not advocating for gender equality or empowerment and therefore is not a feminist post. This person absolutely could have become anxious after reading actual feminist posts, perhaps, but she does not appear to have a good way to deal with this anxiety. It appears to be mainly the product of an untreated anxiety disorder.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 09:14 AM
-1

She is a self-identified feminist who directed a prisoner's rights advocacy group for 20 years and published prolifically on the topic. Here's her feminist ideology at work in an interview response: LS: One of the main misconceptions is that sexual abuse is an inherent part of prison life. That is simply not true. Sexual abuse is not inevitable and unpreventable. ...a lot of people out there believe that prisoners are somehow less deserving of their human rights than the rest of free society. Th…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 09:08 AM
1

Whose table? The FBI's? Is the FBI a women-run organization to you? This is also an example of feminists fighting for men's rights as a natural part of fighting for equality. It is precisely what you asked for.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 08:53 AM
-1

Your OP: So I'm trying to find solid examples where major feminist organizations or high-profile feminists have actively fought against structural or institutional injustices faced by men (e.g., biased custody laws, male domestic violence victims, false accusations, suicide rates, etc.). In the AIDS crisis, multiple groups of feminists worked together to fight against the government's dismissal, mocking, and reluctance to help gay men dying of a terrifying disease. They organized to fight an ins…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 08:50 AM
1

These are just facts? What's going on?
/r/MensRights03/06/25 08:42 AM
0

Valerie Solanas threatened to throw acid in Robin Morgan's face once she found out that SCUM was excerpted in Morgan's anthology of feminist writers. Do with that as you will. Andrea Dworkin left NOW because she was rejected for visiting Solanas in prison. Ideas introduced as "a provocation" are, by definition, not accurate representation's of a widely-held belief. My English teacher taught Jonathan Swift's "A Modest Proposal" but wasn't advocating for eating babies.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 08:41 AM
1

She fought for gender equality becausen she was a feminist. In her own words, quoted in both of our posts, she strategically selected cases affecting individual men and women as part of her career-long fight to end gender discrimination. It is literally an example of what OP asked for, and several others in this thread brought up the same example.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 08:13 AM
0

Oh yes, the incredible depth and polish of scanning a wiki page for the word "feminism." Yes, a word search is a profound way to suggest that the woman most famous for saying the following quote in front of the Supreme Court was not a feminist: "I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks." Your tool explained that she "embodied the principle of equality" rather than feminism, yet she repeatedly referred to herself as a "flaming feminist litiga…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 04:24 AM
1

Valerie Solanas was a diagnosed paranoid schizophrenic who spent much of her adult life institutionalized. She self-published in the sense of selling copies on the street for a dollar each, then a man named Maurice Girodias published it to capitalize on her arrest for shooting Andy Warhol. To claim her manifesto is an accurate representation of widely held feminist beliefs is absurd.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 03:57 AM
5

Lovisa Stannow is a feminist leader and one of the most prolific voices on ending sexual assault in prisons -- something that affects way, way more men and boys than women and girls.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 03:45 AM
0

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/eric-holder-fbi-rape_n_1189145 After years of advocacy from feminist groups, the FBI's legal definition of rape was changed to include male victims. "The Feminist Majority Foundation recently led a "Rape is Rape" campaign, calling on the public to pressure the FBI to update its definition. More than 160,000 emails were sent to the FBI in support. And a decade ago, the Women's Law Project began a campaign to change the definition of rape used by the FBI in its Unifo…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 03:36 AM
0

Genuinely, no I do not. RBG argued in the following 3 points: (1) whether the record shows that the expenses paid for care of the mother of Mr. Moritz were for the purpose of enabling him to be gainfully employed; --> proved this by showing proof of his employment as well as the amount of travel it required, so he needed to pay for a caregiver to enable him to keep working. (2) whether the denial of the deduction solely to a man who has never married and its allowance to women and widowers, divo…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 03:29 AM
1

During most of the AIDS crisis of the 80s/90s, feminists (largely lesbians) were the main support for gay men, including caregiving, activism, legal representation, and advocates.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 03:00 AM
1

It'd be the same. She did it to show that gendered laws are unfair to both genders, not to help his mom.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 02:54 AM
2

AI responses are so... annoying
/r/MensRights03/06/25 02:52 AM
2

I think that calling someone an incel could be considered sexual harassment based on the context, but it is not in and of itself sexual harassment. I've never heard calling someone a "spinster" or "prude" or "old maid" or "frigid" defined as sexual harassment regardless of context. (Certainly can be, depending what was said before or after.) Also, what distinguishes an incel from, say, a virgin or maybe a less-experienced guy or someone who is "unlucky with love" is that, by definition, an incel…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 02:47 AM
1

The inaccurate parts of your statement are that there is no research on female chemical castration (categorically untrue) and that it has never been considered against any female sex offender (the above source says the opposite). It is true that chemical castration is unlikely to be applied to a female offender an offer to reduce a prison sentence, as the UK is considering. However, there are (rare) cases of women sex offenders being sterilized: such as http://www.nytimes.com/1993/01/31/us/woman…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 02:20 AM
1

Depo Provera is a common form of birth control for women, and reduced libido is listed as a common side effect. Per wikipedia: "In women, the most common adverse effects of MPA are acne, changes in menstrual flow, drowsiness, and can cause birth defects if taken by pregnant women. Other common side effects include breast tenderness, increased facial hair, decreased scalp hair, difficulty falling or remaining asleep, stomach pain, and weight loss or gain.[23] Lowered libido has been reported as a…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 01:07 AM
2

I think we are fully in agreement that forced castration of any type is bad and that chemical castration drugs have side effects. What I want to be careful about is labeling all of these drugs as harmful or bad. SSRIs famously cause a range of side effects, and they also have saved many people's lives. Certain cancer patients are given androgen treatments to prevent recurrence, allowing them to live cancer-free. Trans people might thake them to help free them from gender dysphoria. Female birth …
/r/MensRights03/06/25 12:21 AM
2

Is this a feminist post? It's not advocating for gender equality or women's rights. I think it's a sad post by a person with untreated mental illness, though.
/r/MensRights30/05/25 12:12 AM
1

Google Depo Provera.
/r/MensRights30/05/25 12:05 AM
2

It sounds like SSRIs and anti-androgens. So medications that are also prescribed to treat depression, to facilitate certain cancer treatments, and as part of hormone therapy. Of course, it's completely horrific for a government to impose on any person's reproductive system in any way. It's also important to know exactly what they are proposing when voicing our opposition. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/may/22/shabana-mahmood-considers-chemical-castration-for-serious-sex-offenders
/r/MensRights29/05/25 11:50 PM
1

This is inaccurate. The background section of this resource offers some examples: https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1028&context=mjgl
/r/MensRights29/05/25 11:41 PM
1

Obviously, this is horrendous and a massive step backwards for the UK. Important to note that women can also be chemically castrated, as this refers to lowering testosterone levels. You don't need to have a penis to be chemically castrated. Also, the outlined plan would involve medications, and the administration of these meds can be stopped. I don't know about long-term effects, and of course any time the state forcefully interferes with a person's reproductive rights is a tragedy. More details…
/r/MensRights29/05/25 11:24 PM
1

6 glasses
/r/MensRights29/05/25 11:07 PM
1

You're a lost cause if you think accusing Asian women of worshiping white people is not racism. Infant girls were killed after birth. The mental gymnastics you have to go through to assume that parents prefer male babies because they want to raise and care for and feed a male slave (rather than a female one?) are absolutely nuts. I beg you to read any book at all.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 05:59 PM
1

Thank God this is over because it is clear you do not understand how to read research papers. Not a swipe, just an observation. The statement "Physical violence against men by women can involve retaliatory or defensive responses to intimate partner violence by their partners, and can be less severe than violence inflicted by men" is, according to you, in no way biased or ideologically framed — despite the fact that it only includes qualifiers for women’s violence, and despite the fact that all t…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 09:40 AM
1

Check out the commas in my comment above to note that aborted, put up for adoption, and murdered are three items in a list. Then maybe actually read anything about the policy, learn about forced abortion and sterilizations (men included) in the policy, and watch One Child Nation to see hear from the men who were regional leaders tasked with enforcing the policy are still traumatized by it.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 09:06 AM
1

While rarer than abortions, babies were killed. Look it up.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 08:56 AM
1

Hi. Looks like this is copied from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4201052/ , is that correct? If you want to talk about bad-faith debate tactics, let's be clear that posting cherry-picked portions (starting with "However" and having sentences cut off at a comma) of an article that you do not provide a link to is not at all an honest attempt to present information in good faith. Anyway. Check out the methods and results. 1. They include sub-scale scores for men only. We only see men's d…
/r/MensRights22/05/25 11:59 AM
1

Okay, you're basically asking me to paste most of the linked paper into a comment box, but sure. Here you go. If you want to say that any of the statements below are "interpretation" rather than "verified data," you will need to prove it by showing that data in the cited studies do not support the claim. Remember: this paper is a review, which means the authors are summarizing key findings from individual studies to identify larger trends in the research. I don't need to clarify who instigates m…
/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:24 AM
1

I call it racist babble because neither of us are in the group you are making accusations about. Misogyny is also prejudice against women and girls; not just hate. Patriarchy is a system where (some) men have power over all people. Patriarchy never had been or will be a benevolent system toward all men. I get that some feminists think that (and apparently you do, too), but that's not true. Many women absolutely participate in patriarchy to try to gain some of that power for themselves, and so do…
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:50 AM
1

That misrepresents the findings of the meta-analysis, so the authors could not cite that paper in their discussion. Why leave motives out of the equation if we have a body of research on it? Willful censorship is not fairer or more balanced.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:07 AM
1

You're not going to read? Okay let me help you. Patriarchal power structures disadvantage women, who are necessary members of human society. As a result, everyone in society is disadvantaged. Sen described the effects of female malnutrition and other forms of discrimination on men's health.[15] As pregnant women suffer from nutritional neglect the fetus suffers, leading to low birth weight for male as well as female babies. Medical studies have found a close relationship to low birth weight and …
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:00 AM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_women It's almost like patriarchal misogyny hurts men, too? Gasp.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 06:06 AM
1

So... Instead of Physical violence against men by women can involve retaliatory or defensive responses to intimate partner violence by their partners, and can be less severe than violence inflicted by men What about Research shows physical violence against men may occur more often in retaliatory or defensive responses to ipv than it does against women, and it tends to result in fewer injuries.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 03:06 AM
1

"Strange that this isn’t mentioned, don’t you think? If the goal is neutrality or balance, then why only contextualize female-perpetrated violence in this way?" --> because that would inaccurately describes their findings. The goal is not gender parity, the goal is accurately representing the data. "You might argue that this language reflects trends in the literature. But language matters. When framing repeatedly shifts to minimize or contextualize male victimization while amplifying female harm…
/r/MensRights22/05/25 01:02 AM
-1

Same sentiment. Saying males are who they are as justification for bad behavior and expecting others to adapt to their 'unchangeable' nature. Boys will be boys; men will be men; Jamaican men are who they are so deal with it. In this case, it is about sexual assault, which is what you asked for.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 04:08 PM
1

Nevermind this circular argument, actually. How about this. Rephrase the offending portion of the results discussion to eliminate what you see as ideological bias. I've provided links to the citations they use to situate their findings within the context of established research on the topic. (Warning: you will find that what you call "ideology" is, uh, simply acknowledging findings from a sweeping review of studies in the field.) "Substantial proportions of men reported physical (25.4%) and psyc…
/r/MensRights21/05/25 09:44 AM
1

In your words: "authors attempt to excuse this under reactionary violence or couples violence - apparently reciprocal violence is back in rogue when the men are victims." And: "The assumption now being made is that in reciprocal IPV relationships, the male is the instigator. But we can’t definitively state that. Why are we assuming male violence is initiatory, but female violence is reactionary? That’s not supported conclusively by the data." Couples violence = reciprocal violence. But that is a…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 11:56 PM
1

You know how single moms can have shitty boyfriends that might move in, but they're still single moms? About half of single dads live with another adult who is not legally responsible for the kids. Did you read the link, or do you prefer to go on vibes? I have no evidence that kids from "rich single mother households" have worse outcomes than "poor single father households," and I doubt that it is true, so I won't explain that. I also don't know where your data comes from, but a quick search sho…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 05:04 PM
1

Just came across this comment in response to someone trying to walk their daughter to school without harassment: https://www.reddit.com/r/Jamaica/comments/1kn8osf/comment/mshk9wz/?context=3&utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/MensRights20/05/25 02:44 PM
1

Single fathers are more likely to cohabitate with a partner (41%) than single mothers (16%), so they have more domestic help than moms do. They also tend to be older than single mothers. 25% of them are below the poverty line (vs sm's 43%), and they are less well-off than married men. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2013/07/02/the-rise-of-single-fathers/ But again, it's not just bashing women, it's doing so by sidestepping one of if not the most prevalent men's rights violations in the…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 02:41 PM
1

This is what I don't get about this sub. At least in the US, mass incarceration is by far the most prevalent, damaging way that men are systemically stripped of their rights. Instead of railing against the carceral state taking advantage of underprivileged young men and profiting off of their slave labor, we spend our energy dunking on women (with whom men had sex) that raise kids in their own. Instead of speaking about how the justice system strips fathers from their families and perpetuates a …
/r/MensRights20/05/25 02:23 PM
1

Fair enough, you did not claim women are "more violent," and this discussion came out of curiosity about domestic violence rates in lesbian relationships. However, I wouldn't say my assumptions are baseless. In your initial comment: "More men report being hit bitten or struck by an object (authors attempt to excuse this under reactionary violence or couples violence - apparently reciprocal violence is back in rogue when the men are victims)" -- the studies we looked at show women are more likely…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 01:04 PM
0

Not saying you are responsible for Confucian patriarchy and filial piety, but I think that conveniently talking our way around it does not help men. Admitting that it is essentially sexist to favor male babies' lives over female ones does not erase or invalidate men's problems. We need to admit that misogynist traditions hurt men, as is plainly clear in this example. What I am saying is: why are you not considering young fathers as part of this reserve of 'untapped male behaviors'? Young and mid…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 12:47 PM
2

Let's take responsibility for ourselves, shall we? Ultrasound machines are a way for doctors and parents to gain information about a pregnancy. Ultrasound machines did not abort female fetuses, kill female infants, or put female babies up for international adoption. Ultrasound machines are not responsible for Confucian patriarchy or economies that value male over female labor. A baby girl might further your genes, but a prevalent belief in Asia is that a family line is only carried by sons. Why …
/r/MensRights20/05/25 11:58 AM
2

What created the "excess" male population in China in the first place?
/r/MensRights20/05/25 10:05 AM
1

The reciprocity study does show women are more often the perpetrator in non-reciprocal relationships, which also have lower rates of violence and severity of injury than reciprocal. Even in non-reciprocal relationships, the total injuries from male perpetrators (only 30% of non-r perps) were 136 vs 130 from women (70% of non-r perps). Across all relationships, men inflicted 850 injuries on women; women inflicted 687 injuries on men. Box 5 of the study linked in OP's article shows a breakdown of …
/r/MensRights20/05/25 09:52 AM
0

Not according to UN census data on China. https://data.un.org/Data.aspx?q=china+cities+population&d=POP&f=tableCode%3A240%3BcountryCode%3A156 Perhaps you feel that men are invisible (to women? to each other?), but again, this is within the context of their female counterparts being killed at or before birth. Not sure what kind of comparison we are going for here.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 08:41 AM
1

Oh, great link. I used it to pull up an ARCHS report: https://www.latrobe.edu.au/arcshs/documents/arcshs-research-publications/private_lives.pdf Page 51 shows percentages of LGBT+ men and women reporting bring hit, forced into sex, and injured by intimate partners. The stats are pretty equal between cis men and women; a slightly higher percentage of women say they were forced into sex by an intimate partner and slightly higher percentages of men report being hit, injured, needing medical attenti…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 04:29 AM
1

Yup, but that's the only Australian stat about lesbians I could find. This shows cis women that identify as LGB+ report experiencing slightly higher rates of ipv than LGB+ men, but that would also be inclusive of bisexual relationships. I'm not finding any strong support of non-hetero ipv being mostly in lesbian relationships. https://www.aihw.gov.au/family-domestic-and-sexual-violence/population-groups/lgbtiqa-people
/r/MensRights20/05/25 02:32 AM
1

Posting this critique while completely ignoring the fact that there are simply more men in China due to the systematic murder of infant girls by the government under the One Child Policy is... a choice. Baby girls were aborted, put up for international adoption, or killed at much higher rates than boys, and now demographics are skewed. But I'm sorry some women have height preferences (just as some men do).
/r/MensRights20/05/25 01:25 AM
1

Just looking at one year, but another report from Australia shows zero intimate partner murders in lesbian couples and few in gay male couples: https://www.aihw.gov.au/family-domestic-and-sexual-violence/responses-and-outcomes/domestic-homicide
/r/MensRights20/05/25 01:09 AM
0

"The third distinguishing feature of the Global Gender Gap Index is that it ranks countries according to their proximity to gender equality rather than to women’s empowerment. Our aim is to focus on whether the gap between women and men in the chosen indicators has declined, rather than whether women are winning the so-called “battle of the sexes”. Hence, the index rewards countries that reach the point where outcomes for women equal those for men, but it neither rewards nor penalizes cases in w…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 12:57 AM
13

You do get that the young and middle-aged feminists of the 60s and 70s are largely still alive? Gloria Steinem doesn't want your apology. Neither do Alice Walker or Angela Davis or Joni Mitchell. You want to apologize to Nancy Pelosi or Hilary Clinton or Kathleen Cleaver or Yoko Ono? Go ahead, I guess... Do you read, bro?
/r/MensRights20/05/25 12:05 AM
3

"Patriarchy is when men dominate over women, not when men dominate over other men so it doesn’t exist right now and it’s a lie." There has never been a patriarchy in which men only oppressed women and men were never oppressed. Women are oppressed on the basis of sex in a patriarchal system, and the entire population is subject to race/ethnic/religious/sexuality/class oppression. When women are oppressed, men are making the laws. When men are oppressed, men are also making the laws. Know your rea…
/r/MensRights19/05/25 11:41 PM
-18

Yup, just ask Oprah Winfrey, Tom Hanks, Leonardo DiCaprio, Jay-Z, Barack Obama, Steve Jobs, Marilyn Monroe...
/r/MensRights19/05/25 11:29 PM
1

Totally agree that the term toxic masculinity has been misconstrued to the point of meaninglessness, and I'd say the most important aspects that get lost are that 1. the toxicity is suffered by the man who experiences it 2. masculinity is not in and of itself toxic. Toxic gender norms is a great, neutral term that would help with both. I think the difference in the toxic vs internalized terms is directionality. To me, toxic masculinity largely comes from and is enforced by men onto themselves as…
/r/MensRights19/05/25 07:41 PM
1

The term used for this is toxic masculinity...
/r/MensRights19/05/25 05:29 PM
2

Seems like there's a lot of folks in the U.S. who don't care at all about innocent until proven guilty with these men that were kidnapped by the government without due process. We waste a lot of breath on famous men, but what about these guys?
/r/MensRights16/05/25 10:34 PM
2

Looks like they do a better job of communicating these stats at the national level. Check out figure 2, where they acknowledge the offender, victim, or both parties were identified as abusers in the relationship: https://www.aihw.gov.au/family-domestic-and-sexual-violence/responses-and-outcomes/domestic-homicide Further, when presenting information on domestic violence order protections in figure 3, they urge people to be mindful of legal system manipulation and discrepancies that cannot reliabl…
/r/MensRights16/05/25 07:02 PM
1

Unfortunately, women are needed to create the taxpayers that build state finances.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 06:47 PM
1

Nice try at what?
/r/MensRights16/05/25 06:42 PM
1

Sure hope you maintain this energy for people like Kilmar Abrego Garcia and Andry Hernandez Romero.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 06:33 PM
1

Rape kits are almost never processed in a timely way (the "end the backlog" movement is working through hundreds of thousands of decade(s) old kits), so they aren't a slam dunk for men and women who were raped by men, either.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 06:31 PM
3

Dang, that's a good way to put it. Best wishes to your cousin; I'm glad she had the courage to take a step back and not go through with something that didn't feel right. Sounds like you're a great cousin and person to talk to, too. Kudos!
/r/MensRights16/05/25 02:17 PM
12

Yup. It's a fact that she died in 2022, but there is little evidence to prove it was directly related to trying to date while pretending to be a straight man in the 00s. Hedges like "probably" are a key to relating complex or ambiguous ideas with honesty and transparency.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 01:28 PM
23

This is such a fraught topic, but it's great for these stories to be told. My friend went through something similar when he started T in his early 20s; he was also overwhelmed at times by how hard T hit his system, and it affected some of his friendships. In one instance, he literally flipped a table and stormed out after losing a game. He had some major blow-ups that some friends could not deal with and dropped out of his life; other friends told him that they loved him but that he was being an…
/r/MensRights16/05/25 01:07 PM
33

A person being in so much pain she ends her life after years and years of anguish is not a tragedy? Are you ok?
/r/MensRights16/05/25 12:27 PM
25

My understanding of her disassociation during the Iron John retreat was that she experienced more of what this commenter talks about, but since she was neither a cis nor trans man, she did not have the positive, affirming life experiences of being a boy and a man that this person used to put other men's pain into perspective. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/1b5hcce/comment/ktbuh8l/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button Not for nothing…
/r/MensRights16/05/25 12:24 PM
0

Thanks, that helps. Full text of Owens: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6208359/ Honestly, so much of this article is so far above my head, but the results and implications are much more complex than "boys with behavioural problems were less likely to complete high school and university than girls with the same behavioural problems." Owens also finds that boys have a much higher rate of early behavior problems but that the rate decreases by middle school whereas the girls' rate doesn't,…
/r/MensRights15/05/25 04:24 AM
1

This is important research, but it seems like some of these studies are being misrepresented. For the above description of #2 to be accurate, the study would have to focus on specific behaviors (i.e., staring out of a window) and how teachers interpret that behavior differently between male and female students. As in, the teachers might say: "Sally often stares out of the window when she is thinking hard. Billy often stares out of the window because he is easily distracted." This study was about…
/r/MensRights14/05/25 07:42 PM
1

Sorry to comment a year late, but today's headlines led me here. I was struck by the DV stat posted here and did a little digging. Aihw.gov.au reflects the stat you mentioned about Domestic Homicide, with 45% of victims being men. However, most of these men were killed by their children (!!), siblings, or other family members rather than by intimate partners. As far as I can tell, the people involved do not currently have to live in the same home at the time of the homicide, and 2 out of 5 of pa…
/r/MensRights14/05/25 06:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter