TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MasterOfBrutality Archive

View 0 posts and 7 comments by MasterOfBrutality on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I swear you have comprehension issues.
/r/MensRights11/02/11 02:21 PM
3

You're missing the point. Physical capabilty has nothing to with mental maturity. Its a for a similar reason that you can not enter into a legal contract with children. The courts have to determine whether or not individuals understand their actions. They cant base it upon whether or not the kid can ejaculate. Im not saying age is an infallible meter for this, but I also don't see an adequate alternative.
/r/MensRights11/02/11 07:31 AM
3

Statutory rape is based on the premise that the victim is not mature enough to make an informed decision. The rapist, in this instance, uses a position of authority to coerce the victim into having sex. Thats why its rape. U think its fine and dandy to have sex with a nine year so long he gets a boner? Get real.
/r/MensRights11/02/11 04:57 AM
4

I hear ya, but that's also tax evasion and there are already laws in place to discourage the behaviour. Penalizing everyone without "income" for that reason alone targets people who legitimatly dont have any earnings. How can you prove someone doesnt have income of any kind? Kind of hard to prove a negative.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 11:44 PM
4

No income = unable to pay. That seems pretty distinct to me. I mean, are you suggesting the courts ascertain which of these individuals are choosing a life of poverty simply to deprive a child of neccesities? Seems far fetched to me that someone would do that. Laziness isnt a crime, but neglect is.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 11:01 PM
7

A distinction needs to be made between inabilty and neglect. If you have some sort of income and are just selfish, thats entirely different than being homeless and unable to pay.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 09:14 PM
13

What's with the sensationalist title? The officers were encouraged to pursue intimate relations. At no point did it say their jobs depended on it or that they were forced. Moreover, the women have every right to be pissed off, just like any woman does (or man) when lied to simply to have sex with them. What makes this exceptionally disturbing was it was encouraged by the police department. To encourage officers to do this is disturbing, from both the perspective of an officer, and the woman.
/r/MensRights25/01/11 01:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter