TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Masterwallabee Archive

View 5 posts and 68 comments by Masterwallabee on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

The only reason I would even think of it that way is because of this (www.np.reddit.com/r/AdviceAnimals/comments/2kd2b6/bad_luck_brian) post, which is where I assume OP got the idea from. And we all know that lying on the internet is impossible... edit: formatting
/r/MensRights26/10/14 04:53 PM
-1

If the guy was playing the prank on his gf, it would still be pretty mean. A lot of couples get very stressed out about pregnancy scares. This strikes me as the same kind of "prank" as those kids on youtube that throw gallons of milk on the floor at stores.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 03:45 PM
4

Maybe that would be a good idea. Too many people get TRP and MRM mixed up.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 07:15 PM
12

Would this be a good example of "poisoning the well"? It certainly seems like the original poster has never actually looked into men's rights activism.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 09:41 AM
1

It's statutory rape, and they were his teachers.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 10:14 PM
15

There is also a strange amount of concern for the rapists. What a lot of people fail to realize is that that kid has to live with the idea that he threw these two women in jail. Being congratulated by people for assisting in the ruination of 2 peoples lives. I had a similar situation, and it seemed cool, and then it really didn't.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 12:29 PM
7

Most of the comments that start out as sympathetic are really just the lead in for a joke. Example: I feel sorry for the kid. At no point in his life, will he be nearly as awesome as he is right now. Nothing will ever match up and his life has peaked before he even graduates highschool.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 12:28 PM
21

/r/feminism would inevitably delete the post. They are notorious for censorship.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 06:42 AM
69

Hijacking top comment to satisfy curiosity. Please, no interference in the experiment. Same post on 2X Gender-swapped version on OffMyChest I'd really like to stress the "no participation" on this one. I'd love to get accurate results.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 06:25 AM
1

Even if they have separate "take your dad" and "take your mom" days, which wouldn't be as good as a "take your parents," the way the message in the pamphlet is worded is still really problematic. They could have separate parent days and not have "number one: don't let mom do all the work" be on something they pass out to everyone.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 07:02 PM
27

I agree, it's a great message to spread that both parents (assuming they're in the picture) should actively be involved in the lives of their children. Assuming that moms are the only ones interested in their kids' lives and creating PSAs off of that stereotype is really harmful, even if they assume they're doing good.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 01:44 AM
2

Honest question: does this title actually fall under the category of vote manipulation? OP is asking for votes on the video, which is on youtube, not votes for his own post. It seems like there might be a distinction.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 04:20 PM
2

I totally agree with the voting system being the way to go. I didn't know it, but I was looking for /r/MRActivism. Thank you for your input!
/r/MensRights24/09/14 04:15 AM
3

I try to do my part spreading information about men's rights, and there definitely is a lot of feminist backlash. I've been called everything from brainwashed to moronic just for suggesting that men can be the victims of rape or domestic violence, and it really is a sickening response. It's gross seeing people who are actually dealing with inequalities called "sexist neckbeards" by feminists who think it's really important that we get rid of strippers in video games.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 03:08 AM
3

I've been a supporter of men's rights since I found this sub around a year ago. I'm not an active poster, but the community here has definitely influenced the way I see world issues. Personally I think it would be really amazing to see more being done for male victims, and /u/DougDante linked me to the sub /r/MRActivism. That sub shows a lot of promise and was exactly what I was looking for.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 02:51 AM
3

Thanks for linking that! I'll check it out.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 02:36 AM
0

Similar response from the AskFeminist thread: "You're right... we do hate misogyny!"
/r/MensRights10/09/14 12:19 AM
1

Similar response from the AskFeminists thread: It depends. If the person is just ignorant but rational, I may ask questions to see how they came to that conclusion. If they don't seem rational, I chuckle to myself and move on.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 12:19 AM
3

Similar response from the AskFeminists thread. Ask them to define "hate group" and ask for evidence. But really, arguments like this are poisoning the well and therefore not usually worth humoring.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 12:19 AM
5

Similar response from the AskFeminists thread: "You're right... we do hate misogyny!"
/r/MensRights10/09/14 12:18 AM
5

That was a really well thought out answer, thank you for taking the time to reply. As frustrating as it can be to talk to people who don't agree with you, I think that being logical and not demeaning is the best way to get your point across.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 06:17 AM
21

Using a logical fallacy because the other group is known for using a logical fallacy only brings you to their level, though.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 05:53 AM
3

I don't see how being female has anything to do with loving zero tolerance policies. I don't know anyone in real life, male or female, who thinks that zero tolerance is a good idea. The principal in the article is also a male, Steve Zack. Bringing gender into this argument is unnecessary.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 04:16 AM
2

Wait you disagree with me? ill bash ur fken ead in i sware on me mum But yeah, civil discussions are the way to go. Alienating people by being violent will never cause someone to consider your viewpoint. Thank you for being polite also.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 05:34 AM
1

Anti-life makes about as much sense as pro-life, no one is advocating to just straight up kill babies. (Okay maybe someone is advocating to kill babies, but that's not most people...) It's a question of whether or not someone has the right to choose, and you're either for it or against it. I actually agree with you about having a line drawn, and you might be surprised to learn that almost all pro-choicers do too. Personally, I believe that it's wrong to have an abortion after the fetus has passe…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 09:41 PM
3

It's called bodily autonomy. Many anti-choicers don't believe this is a valid argument, such as yourself, so in that case what you said makes a lot of sense. That aside, whether or not the unborn fetus gets aborted is ultimately the woman's decision because her body is the one working to provide shelter and nutrients for it to grow. Her body, and not the man's is the one that is being affected by the growing fetus. If we're assuming this is a couple in a relationship, then of course the man has …
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:32 AM
3

I was using it in a legal context. I could, also, track you down and harvest your organs, but don't for a variety of reasons, one of them being that it's illegal.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:19 AM
2

You can't force a woman to carry a child, and you can't force her to give one up either. It's the same thing as me not being allowed to force you to give me one of your internal organs "because I want it."
/r/MensRights06/05/14 05:50 AM
2

The second argument doesn't assume that abortion is morally wrong, it simply states that it causes an emotional burden. I would argue that any potentially life-changing event has a significant emotional toll. Regardless of whether or not you're pro-choice, anyone in that situation is likely to dwell on the potential outcomes of the situation. That's human psychology, not ethics.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 05:31 AM
3

Thanks bro, forgot to move the period up to make it a percent.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:54 AM
9

Defence lawyer Khaled El-Komi said: "The inclusion of the names of the three females amongst those accused in the storming the police in the Minya Governorate suggests the case is fabricated. It is unreasonable to think that women were paid to break into the police station." Why is it unreasonable for a woman to accept payment to perform a crime? Even if it is uncommon, the numbers represent that. These women make up 0.44% of the people who have been sentenced to death. And they are who the news…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 01:24 AM
7

Good for him, skirts are cooler anyway.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 01:15 AM
4

I felt the same way, but I watched the whole thing anyway. Watch the whole thing, you'll change your mind.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 06:55 AM
3

Not bluper, but this is some fuckery if I've ever seen it: I think regardless of the demographic of the culprits—be it primarily male, or primarily female—the answer is the same. Under patriarchy, even women can lack respect for themselves and other women, and feel automatic ownership of other women's bodies. This is an example of that. So when we ask questions about what to do about rape, one answer is breaking the culture that makes rape okay. Likewise, we should be breaking the culture that m…
/r/MensRights25/04/14 08:07 AM
0

It seems you posted this in the wrong subreddit... people here tend to not identify themselves as feminist.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 08:43 AM
1

It was the ridiculousness of how things were portrayed. For example, the woman with the baby asking, "is this gonna take long?" when she's in a job interview. Or his description of having to be able to work "laying down, just splayed out like a jellyfish," which contrasts to the woman with the baby saying, "I haven't eaten a meal sitting down in nine years." The video seems to be portraying the exact opposite of the original video in a way that is too farcical to be taken seriously. Notice also …
/r/MensRights23/04/14 07:29 AM
1

Wouldn't the shaving cream at the sink in the beginning of the video strongly hint that the person in the video is male? Most women I know shave in the shower, not in front of the mirror.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 12:00 PM
1

I'm 90% sure this is satirical. Everyone knew the "hardest job in the world" video was bullshit, this video is just pointing that out. Getting all up in arms over this is pointless...
/r/MensRights22/04/14 11:46 AM
5

Obviously a joke. It's nice to see some satire on the "Are you dating a REAL MAN" crap people write so often.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 08:10 AM
2

How dare you breathe, you patriarchal scum. That air belongs to the womyn of the world. \s
/r/MensRights18/04/14 05:58 AM
25

The original article, if you're curious.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 01:06 AM
0

What kind of punishment do you think just "a couple rapes" deserves? Rape is a terrible crime, regardless of who the victim is. What do you think should happen to repeat rapists?
/r/MensRights05/04/14 03:45 AM
2

Batman is right though...
/r/MensRights31/03/14 06:38 AM
2

This is an interesting article, but one of the biggest flaws I noticed was the emphasis put on the group Autism Speaks. Many people, particularly those on the autistic spectrum, are against this group and see it as offensive. Here's one article that explains some of the reasons why, though there are many others that express similar concerns. Many people also believe that the numbers of children diagnosed with autism are on the rise because of a decreased negative stigma and an increasingly lenie…
/r/MensRights28/03/14 07:06 AM
3

I used to work in a dining hall at a retirement home. We were required to take the woman's order first, regardless of the seating arrangement. It was a little ridiculous, but they were a bunch of rich old farts who would get offended if you did it any other way. I'm not saying that's correct, but some places do have that as a (stupid and outdated) policy.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 06:14 AM
3

They also give the girl more screen time? I'm guessing the guy didn't hold the sign as long. Also, the one group that refuses to give the guy a hug also walks away when the girl tries... maybe they were just weirded out by the idea of it?
/r/MensRights22/03/14 09:20 PM
7

That's where bodily autonomy comes into play. No matter what, the man cannot make the woman carry her child, or give it up. However, I believe that the man has every right to withdraw financially from the situation at the same time the woman has the right to have an abortion. Similarly, if the woman does not want to raise a child, but is willing to give birth to one for her partner, she should also have the ability to opt out financially. In this arrangement, the woman does have more power, beca…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 07:00 AM
1

Edit: replied to the wrong comment.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 06:59 AM
24

I agree with the sentiment about child support, but it makes sense for the woman to have the ultimate say in whether or not she gets an abortion. If, at the stage when the woman is deciding that, the man also gets to decide whether he wants to support the child, the system would be a lot better. If the man decides that he does not want to be involved and the woman chooses to keep the fetus regardless, she's saying that she believes herself capable of supporting and raising a child without the ma…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 10:20 PM
4

It also seems that he didn't research the procedure at all before he got it, but felt as though it was everyone else's responsibility to inform him.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 02:16 PM
1

TW man in the picture, may remind you of rape/the patriarchy
/r/MensRights05/03/14 09:09 AM
5

These are very interesting, and a great example of how men have been viewed as disposable throughout the ages. It's amazing how much we can infer about a culture based on just a collection of posters. In addition to the objectification of men, the posters demonstrate subtle racism and a lower tolerance for violence. For example, this picture is supposed to be heart-wrenching and graphic-- can you imagine what it would look like if someone tried to create the same effect today?
/r/MensRights03/03/14 01:03 PM
1

TBH I don't see anything wrong with her point, there. Breasts are overly sexualized in Western cultures. In other cultures where the top half of either sex is considered okay to be exposed, it's not like the world is ending. Just because I'm uncomfortable with the style of socks and sandals doesn't mean that I have the right to decide for other people what to wear. Requiring the genitalia to be covered is a lot different than only requiring the fatty tissue of one sex to be covered. Like what's …
/r/MensRights28/02/14 12:42 PM
1

Haha, I was joking a little bit with the sniper thing and with glassesarecool. People tend to insult one another either to goad someone into doing something or because they are mad about what happened. Someone might taunt another player to lure them into a trap, because they feel victorious, or because they are butthurt about losing. It's not "because I beat them," it's because they were beaten. They would react the same way regardless of my gender. Could you clarify this? Are you saying they ar…
/r/MensRights20/02/14 04:12 AM
1

That makes sense to me, people tend to group with others who are like them, but if you look at the specific subreddit Celda linked, you'll see something different. I've never been to r/girlgamers, so I don't know if the posts today are typical or not, but let's compare a few different subreddits. The top few posts in r/Gaming: *Good Guy Bethesda *Flappy Bird in Minecraft *You stay classy, Nintendo The top few posts in r/GirlGamers: *Girl cosplays Dota2 on twitch - gets sexually harassed by a pro…
/r/MensRights20/02/14 01:49 AM
1

Something about gaming that is consistent across every game I've played is that people shamelessly sling insults at one another, but it's never actually sincere. When someone screams at you over a game, it's because they are frustrated and angry at what happened, not you personally. Everyone who games knows that there are a lot of people better than they are, a lot of people who invest more time in the game, and a lot of people who do things just to be dicks. In a face-to-face game played on a f…
/r/MensRights20/02/14 01:27 AM
1

haha thank you! My first gold!
/r/MensRights20/02/14 01:10 AM
5

Wait, you mean that if I don't prove my worth as a human being through some sort of actual contribution to the game/conversation, I don't get special treatment? But that's sexist!sarcasm
/r/MensRights19/02/14 11:51 AM
20

I'm a woman, a gamer, and not professional. I don't have enough time to devote to it, but that's beside the point. In every game I've played, I've gotten a ton of shit, but very little of it has actually been gender related. People are just assholes when placed behind a screen, and it's never actually personal. You just killed me? You're a scumbag who deserves to rot in hell. I just killed you? You're a loser and you should never play again. That's just how gaming goes, and taking it personally …
/r/MensRights19/02/14 05:28 AM
4

Oh I didn't know that! Thanks. Words do tend to change in meaning over time, though. It makes sense to me that the phrase "househusband" could be used to specify a stay at home husband. Even with the original meaning, "house-owner who stays at house" is similar to "woman who stays at house." It is a bit redundant, though.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 06:10 AM
10

I think a big problem with teaching kids, "It's never okay to hit a woman" is that young girls learn that it's okay to physically abuse boys in order to get what they want. While it's constantly reinforced for men that hitting a girl is never okay, girls get a constant reminder that they are "invincible." It would be better to teach kids that violence isn't the correct way to handle feelings of anger, something none of the women depicted in that video seem to understand, but that self defense is…
/r/MensRights18/02/14 04:29 AM
3

I don't understand why, could you explain? People say "housewife," after all.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 04:10 AM
3

This is spot on. Something the article apparently missed is that when two (childless) people start dating, they should both put an equal effort financially and emotionally into the situation. That is equal. And later down the road, if they divide up working and homemaking/child rearing duties, that is equal also. If my boyfriend was working and I was unable to find a job, I'd make damn sure the house is spotless and meals are hot/on time. If we were both working, then I'd expect things to be spl…
/r/MensRights18/02/14 04:06 AM
0

In this situation, I don't think it's about gender at all. She mentions that the father is a substance abuser and that his whole family wanted her to have an abortion. In this case, she chose to give the child up for adoption because that's what she thought was best for him. By not telling him the truth, she's avoiding a potentially dangerous situation for the kid. Not because the father is a man, but because drugs make people unstable. She mentions later in the thread that she is in contact wit…
/r/MensRights17/02/14 05:47 AM
2

No, that's not what I said. A LOT of people, especially women, are disgusting, manipulative, sadistic monsters. I guess I put it the wrong way when I said they are all immature, but I believe the majority of them are. The problem is that in our society, a lot of women aren't encouraged to grow up/mature. Personally, I blame feminism for that. The feminists are fighting tooth and nail to get rid of the negative implications of being female, but I've never seen a feminist argue that women should h…
/r/MensRights29/01/14 12:35 AM
3

No you don't understand, if this was hundreds of years ago, there wouldn't be any sexism towards you! That means it doesn't count now, either! That's obviously how reality works!
/r/MensRights28/01/14 02:52 PM
3

I'm seeing a lot of "women are just manipulative bitches, even if they don't know it" in this thread. And while I certainly know a few who are like that, I can honestly say it's just a sign of immaturity. Calling out someone as "manipulative" and "a liar" when they confess attraction to you is despicable. It's normal for a human being to try to be friendly with another human being before approaching them romantically. There are some guys who feel entitled to sex after being "nice," but those are…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 02:48 PM
3

This seems a lot like satire... I don't know any women who take any of that seriously. "6 figure salary" BS. The article is saying "if you aren't a millionaire, don't bother trying." My interpretation of it is that it's making fun of what women are "told" to look for in a partner (financial security, good looks, etc) and taking it to an extreme, highlighting how irrelevant it is in a real relationship.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 12:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter