TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MattMooks Archive

View 0 posts and 42 comments by MattMooks on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Lol same source as OP really, except I'm not asking you to trust me because I don't care if you believe it or not
/r/MensRights23/05/22 07:50 AM
-2

He made a claim, before I even said anything. Wait, hold on, do you think the original post should be taken as gospel and only counter-claims need backing up? Also, I don't sound like that at all because I don't care if you believe me. You're very welcome to make an idiot of yourself by just believing OPs ridiculous claim without any evidence.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 08:45 PM
1

Mate, I appreciate that you're being polite and civil but have you asked OP for examples of their claim? Do some research if you care. I don't really care about this at all right now because I'm out having a drink, I just have too much ego to ignore the replies I guess.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 08:43 PM
-11

Those things aren't contradictory. I don't care if you believe it or not. Go tell a woman that they never get told how to treat a man and see what happens. For the record OP provided no examples, but I guess you couldn't see past your own bias to realise that.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 08:39 PM
2

Okay, and I'm sorry for being snappy. But no, I don't have any examples.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 08:29 PM
1

Right? Whether we need to or not is irrelevant to my original post
/r/MensRights22/05/22 08:10 PM
-3

Spill what?
/r/MensRights22/05/22 08:05 PM
3

Because I'm a man
/r/MensRights22/05/22 08:05 PM
-16

I don't think I said anywhere that I, personally, would prove you wrong so maybe chill out. Go ahead and believe it if you want, idc
/r/MensRights22/05/22 08:05 PM
-15

Dont know, I don't read them since I don't need to know how to treat a man.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 08:03 PM
-36

Sorry but Women are also taught how to treat a man. Don't make the mistake of thinking this is a double standard because you'll just get proved wrong.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 07:34 PM
2

So you didn't mean anything you said, you were just trying to irrate them? Or you did mean it, but now you can't think of a response so that's what you're going with?
/r/MensRights17/05/22 02:26 PM
1

So why did you reply to me then?? Makes no sense. Me: No woman has an issue with this. You: wE doNt hAvE iSsUe WiTh WoMeN. Me: Okay? You: IM SAYING WOMEN DON'T HAVE AN ISSUE WITH IT, OMG WHY DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND!!?
/r/MensRights24/03/22 01:24 PM
1

Your original comment had nothing to do with mine. Then you falsely claimed you were saying something else, and I highlighted your contradiction using the two quotes. I've still got no idea what you're going on about. It's all irrelevant to my comment. Pretty sure you replied to the wrong person and now you're trying to save face.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 01:17 PM
0

So... I as saying that I don't think women are gonna have a problem with this, feminists are. No, you weren't saying that. Do you understand?
/r/MensRights24/03/22 01:07 PM
1

I don't think any of us have a problem with women. We have a problem with the group that started out as fighting for rights but is now fighting against rights. I as saying that I don't think women are going to have a problem with this, feminists are. Initially you said you don't think we have a problem with women.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 12:09 PM
1

What are you talking about? I never said that.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 11:32 AM
1

Yes, but they were not arguing that male bc is perfect. They were arguing that nobody is trying to prevent it, because the original post made such claims. And you asked: Men are only asking for better methods. Is that an issue for you? Which is why I'm telling you, its not an issue for anybody. Women would rather men take birth control too. Why would they want to take on sole responsibility of that? Plus it would be peace of mind to know that you and your partner are taking birth control.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 09:01 PM
-9

Men are only asking for better methods. Is that an issue for you? I literally don't know anyone who would have an issue with this. This whole post is based on a strawman.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 05:22 PM
12

I've never seen anything to suggest that women don't want men to have birth control. If anything, the majority probably prefer that since it's more peace of mind for both parties. What instances are there of feminists fighting against male contraceptives?
/r/MensRights23/03/22 05:07 PM
11

What is masculine about homophobia, aggressiveness and sexist tropes? As you said yourself, women exhibit these traits too. To me, they sound like toxic traits, not exclusive to masculinity.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 10:23 AM
2

I've literally quoted your contradictions back to you and you've ignored them twice. Sorry this has been confusing but I'll reiterate my argument one last time. Doesn't matter since you're not gonna reply anyway, right? We have evolved to be able to eat meat, or plants. Either both or just one or the other. Plants and/or animals - as per my original comment. We weren't 'built to eat both'
/r/MensRights15/03/22 10:21 AM
2

I agree we are omnivorous. I never said we shouldn't eat meat or that it's unnatural. The point I'm making is that we evolved to be able to eat meat or plants or both.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 10:13 AM
3

we are built to eat both, not one or the other you can eat both, you can choose to eat one or the other I'm missing your point because you're changing it. This disagreement revolves around your claim that we are designed to eat both and only both. 1)we weren't designed. There is no designer. We weren't designed FOR any particular purpose. We evolved with a desire to survive and reproduce so you're wrong in saying we were designed to eat both. 2)we can eat either plants OR meat. We evolved to BE …
/r/MensRights15/03/22 10:09 AM
5

we were built to eat both, not one or the other designed as in biologically born with the ability to eat both So assuming you use 'designed' and 'built' interchangeably then you believe that we are: Biologically born with the ability to eat both meat and plants but NOT one or the other? If you think this, then how do you explain the millions of people living on only plant-based diets? How are they surviving if they're not biologically born with the ability to just eat plants? (with regards to yo…
/r/MensRights15/03/22 09:51 AM
7

We weren't designed... Who is it that you think designed us? Are you talking about God? We evolved to be able to eat both. The fact that I can choose to eat either/or and live a healthy life is evidence of that.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 09:33 AM
3

That isn't being debated. That was my point. We are capable of surving off plants and/or meat. Being ABLE to eat either or, is different to being built FOR eating it. The latter implies some purpose, motive or goal. We weren't designed for anything.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 09:26 AM
-5

Well no, because that's not a fact. We were not built and we weren't made 'for' anything, we just happened. There was no will or intention by evolution to have us eat both meat and vegetables. We have evolved to be capable of surviving on a fully plant-based diet.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 09:12 AM
-8

Animals and/or plants
/r/MensRights15/03/22 08:48 AM
8

Sorry, I'm not sure I follow. My point was that if you made the comment to a group of women that you appreciate them for cleaning and cooking, the vast majority would be insulted. In my opinion, it's assuming that those people in that group all play into those stereotypes. And if they don't conform to those expected roles, they get no appreciation. They have no other value. I am not a very handy person around the house but I enjoy cooking and make the majority of meals for my partner. Does this …
/r/MensRights10/03/22 12:41 PM
9

This is all well and good, I'm glad you see the positive to it, but it still doesn't change the point.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 12:08 PM
26

Imagine going to twoX and saying "we appreciate women for cleaning up and making food"
/r/MensRights10/03/22 11:38 AM
2

They're not saying it excuses it
/r/MensRights22/02/22 10:28 AM
97

"Equal pay is not enough. We want to wear fashionable clothes but they're more expensive than unfashionable clothes! Stupid men"
/r/MensRights02/02/22 04:59 PM
4

But there are plenty of things which disproportionately affect men too. They are underrepresented in areas such as healthcare, education, humanitarian roles and probably more. There are so many support systems in place to encourage women into underrepresented roles but nothing for men to do the same. Men are also killed in the workplace, in suicides and through violence far more often. They're also far more likely to be homeless, and have no shelters to go to. In many countries, men are forced t…
/r/MensRights27/01/22 11:58 AM
3

I admit, I don't really fear being raped when walking the streets and I'm sorry that you do. I fear an assault/mugging escalating to the point where I hit my head off of something, or going to the floor and having my head stomped on, leading to permanent brain damage or death. Again, I understand the the perpetrators of said violence are usually male but I still don't understand why you're pointing it out. It's not evidence of a patriarchy.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 11:12 AM
4

I don't understand what point you're making by highlighting that it's men committing the violence. It's a subset of violent men, yes. Does that mean I'm responsible on their behalf because we are the same gender? Or does it mean I deserve to be assaulted? I assume your answer to those would be no, but then I'm stuck trying to work out why it matters? The guy you're responding to was pointing out that men still have to be vigilant and careful when walking the streets. We have the same fears excep…
/r/MensRights27/01/22 10:52 AM
-10

Everytime they say something valid you just call them a troll. You were clearly making an insulting remark about the appearance of her vagina. Why are you afraid to own up to it now?
/r/MensRights21/12/21 12:21 PM
2

You mean you couldn't* give less of a shit. If you "could" give less of a shit, then that means you give a shit still.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 03:10 PM
0

And what did the original commenter say? Or are you conveniently ignoring that? Here, let me make it simple for you... Original commenter makes generalising statement about women. The responder makes generalising statement about men. Both are bad, except the difference is the responder doesn't believe (so, I assume) what they said. They're only saying it to point out the issue.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 03:09 PM
1

As was the original comment but I don't see you calling that out
/r/MensRights07/11/21 02:56 PM
0

Yeah he generalised men, to make a point. How you not getting it?
/r/MensRights07/11/21 02:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter