TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Maverick-_1 Archive

View 0 posts and 264 comments by Maverick-_1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yes, the author is an absolute outlier and argues consistently. Women won't show any significant learning curve, but even men won't, compare society with ancient Roman Empire some 2,042 years ago. Men failed to learn from experience!
/r/MensRights21/05/24 05:02 AM
2

They threaten to tear society down with them. Risk of higher taxes, way too low birthrates and finally we'll be forced to fix it or opt out early enough via emigration, but where to? Demographics can't be fixed anytime soon, rather crater for further decades to come. We'll face the fallout. Men enabled and enforced that feministic madness, they're the worst, like male feminists, slmps.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 04:59 AM
14

Proves how delusional and incompetent women are. Unable to objectively realize how ultra overvalued they're before crashing into the wall. Predominantly running on instincts and emotions. Resulting in society had to regulate and police them as they utterly failed. Don't expect any learning curve in them! "Better Bachelor" Made a video on that.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 04:55 AM
6

Fair enough! Simultaneously still a total societal failure, maybe almost unavoidable. Could it be that women's supposedly total inability to objectively figure themselves and everything related their astronomical obervaluation very much contributed to it all? Like a stockholder totally mistaken and delusional about the real worth of his stock they crash (into the wall). When they realized they're ultra overvalued and will only crater more and more until totally worthless and ignored negative emo…
/r/MensRights21/05/24 04:51 AM
1

Scientifically obvious. Happiness as an emotion evolved only as a means to an end, Not an end goal! Question being if women were not intelligent or rather responsible enough to be allowed to do what they want as they permanently mess up big time. Like maybe 15/ 16 y/o, overgrown?
/r/MensRights21/05/24 03:54 AM
2

Yes. And dragging young women down to them by lying to them instead of confessing how they messed up. Partly they still don't get it and see other women as competition and are jealous? No accountability, no responsibilty, outright madness? But evolved to be that way?
/r/MensRights21/05/24 03:50 AM
1

At least not since around 1960? Historically those ultra long societal circles included hard patriarchy and soft patriarchy. The third we're in now, is it called gynocentrism? Experts went about how it repeats over millennia without end and any viable learning curve, also not in men. Analytically reason being supposedly bigender instincts and macro there seems to be nothing to evolve beyond?
/r/MensRights21/05/24 03:47 AM
1

When evolutionarily all depends on their increased objective needs after our neocortex grew significantly, resulting in ultra long child-rearing and less productivity near giving birth, too. Anecdotally they self-delude with that variable exploitation of men, depending on our income, net worth and respective jurisdiction's misandric legal discrimination. Hypothesis: they make themselves belief consenting to sex, albeit Mutual, would magically make everything somehow "fair"(?) Reason being them a…
/r/MensRights21/05/24 03:42 AM
2

Dead on! Male enslavement, female (partial) tyranny and some kind of communism. Agreed, but what about those men supporting them, enabling and enforcing everything, pandering to them, (very) needy? Analytically those seem to be worst as they might sabotage all attempts to rescue society! Think of male feminists, slmps and White Knights.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 03:27 AM
1

Yes, empirically it won't work because of co-evolved instincts in them they predominantly 90%+ run on! Taking their power away to rescue society seems without alternative, but how?
/r/MensRights21/05/24 03:20 AM
6

Yes. Thinking about how feminists late 1960s in 70s publically called themselves very severely mentally ill exposes them big time. Question being how to disempower those men who support this madness as women alone wouldn't be able to! Publically calling those out to create awareness and public shaming to start with?
/r/MensRights21/05/24 03:18 AM
5

Yes, disposable utility. Sperm, some mention sperm banks and extreemly few understand how almost everything IRL depends on competent and hard working men. Incapable women who simultaneously still don't get it objectively, that's even worse. The only improvement might be to finally take power back, at least to a sufficient degree. Men enabled and enforced that madness while women alone wouldn't have been able to!
/r/MensRights21/05/24 03:13 AM
3

Yes, some are extremely dangerous, If they had the means and power or others and even men to support or follow them!
/r/MensRights21/05/24 03:09 AM
2

No such thing at least since after 1960. Probably a giant shlt test societally very many men still fall for?
/r/MensRights21/05/24 03:08 AM
2

Dead on! Discussed in the manosphere. Women very often unable to earn and admit having messed up. Partly it's far worse, lying to Younger women to have them mess up, to. Women maybe to 90%+ rinnings on instincts when cultural evolution seems way too different from the relevant paleolithical savannah habitat which resulted in most of their instincts. Women unable and unwilling to try figuring things and themselves out (proto) scientifically. Like: why? Probably need some form of regulation to pre…
/r/MensRights21/05/24 03:06 AM
4

No permanence of emotion and instincts before emotions before logic. Additionally an abysmal societal failure as attraction isn't a choice and female nature Had been totally ignored. Question being, if regulation social shaming or policing would even be more than only gradually work? They aren't attracted to nowadays probably (way?) more than 80% of men, consider it only pretence "settling", call. that gross, who can want that?
/r/MensRights21/05/24 02:59 AM
3

Sceptical about their learning curve, no permanence of emotion and instincts before emotions before logic. Additionally an abysmal societal failure as attraction isn't a choice and female nature Had been totally ignored. Question being, if regulation social shaming or policing would even be more than only gradually work? They aren't attracted to nowadays probably (way?) more than 80% of men, consider it only pretence "settling", call. that gross, who can want that?
/r/MensRights21/05/24 02:58 AM
2

Ancient DNA sequencing proves female nature and paternity fraud or like behaviour!
/r/MensRights08/05/24 02:19 PM
6

Like sudden marriage proposals, than for LTR.🙄
/r/MensRights06/05/24 04:55 PM
-30

😳🙄
/r/MensRights06/05/24 04:52 PM
5

When she feels like explaining after break-up "it made no sense. ...no fun ... no money! ..."😲😳🙄
/r/MensRights06/05/24 04:51 PM
12

When she cancels her future job after the marriage proposal.🙄
/r/MensRights06/05/24 04:49 PM
1

Because women positively select for evolutionarily subconsciously (still) running on instincts predominantly derived from paleolithicum. And men doing often everything supposedly needed to get with them. Caveat: because of female nature.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 03:05 PM
12

In the ebook "Rise of men" male mutilation and often religious reasons are analysed. Caveat it's intentionally invented in order to artificially inflate the value of the vajayjay, to disincentivise m@sturb@tion. A very shocking chapter on it!
/r/MensRights25/04/24 08:40 PM
2

Dead on. Imagine without desire and without attraction! When some redditor went about enthusiastic consent which seems dead on.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 01:47 PM
1

Even totally without anything negative of that anecdotally it's really confusing personally and staying non reactive might be best. They somehow seem to destroy any connection with such behaviour. Personally, recently, I think it's a combination of my genes, her post wall (probably frustrated, unexpectedly(?), and an ego thing. During work, as a potential client, still. All of them millionaires, rather multi-millionaires, maybe some marriage hunting ground? But no evidence for that. Men mustn't …
/r/MensRights22/04/24 01:44 PM
2

😂
/r/MensRights22/04/24 01:38 PM
1

Their hypergamous trap?
/r/MensRights22/04/24 01:37 PM
0

Defamation laws, also as threat and self-protection?
/r/MensRights22/04/24 12:03 PM
1

😂
/r/MensRights22/04/24 11:50 AM
2

And they can and do change.🙄 E.g. post 26 or so.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 11:43 AM
2

Exactly, it's their paleolithical instincts! Them still(!) in struggle for survival(!) Hence protection (and provision) is still (very) important. So If she feels(!) you'd be whipped that very easily, just be looks usually, another woman could come along and ensnare you(!), so she cannot trust you! Hence authentic masculine indifference and anecdotally it finally really works, especially when really not caring, like at all, the instinctually notice!
/r/MensRights22/04/24 11:42 AM
1

Happened very recently and impression being she's not cool about it. When I spontaneously thought of several very cool phrases her collegue couldn't help laughing (very) big time, I'm sure. Reminds me of them supposedly not having humour, like in general?🤔
/r/MensRights22/04/24 11:35 AM
1

Trying to analyze such a recent event, partly or almost totally(?) an ego issue. Regardless of wealth, income, status (her, too). Some very sensitive psychological help could be very good and maybe the opposite, feminine indifference?🤔 Considering to claim I'd be insecure 😉 and nothing's gonna happen before the 5th date!😉 That'd most probably or for sure be a big laugh, but maybe only for her collegue?🤔
/r/MensRights22/04/24 11:30 AM
2

Societally that total lack of any regulations, women aren't evolved for that, like at all. Slmps and white knights partly enabling and enforcing much of it.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 11:24 AM
1

😂 they definitely are into mysterious, aren't they?
/r/MensRights22/04/24 11:19 AM
1

Dead on with reversing those three!
/r/MensRights22/04/24 11:10 AM
1

Maybe too hard to handle. or too big for you?😂
/r/MensRights22/04/24 11:02 AM
1

"old XXXXXX"?🤔 Makes me curious.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 10:50 AM
1

Or both!😂 And insecure 😉, I consider playing that IRL with her collegue witnessing, would be very much fun, if she wouldn't or didn't seem to be onesidedly into me.🙄 Or "nothing's gonna happen before the 5th date!"😂 That should be a burner! Maybe somr solid looking post wall boss women feel deprived of attention, especially when divorced. Best guess she totally messed up analyzing the market and herself, probably very or extremely many totally mess up with that?🤔
/r/MensRights22/04/24 10:50 AM
3

what about slmps and white knights? Risk of gamma bias, isn't it?
/r/MensRights22/04/24 10:37 AM
2

Savage 😂
/r/MensRights22/04/24 10:34 AM
1

Literally almost the same anecdotally. That seems to totally either destroy or significantly burden that else previously positive, constructive contact. My genes, her post wall and an ego thing in unknown quantity and impression growing she won't be into sensitive, constructive (proto) scientifical analysis and chances are, absolutely nobody will, and that's part of why they come across more or less (very) needy.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 10:30 AM
3

Literally anecdotally especially that potential threat as her collegue suddenly went totally out of the blue How old are you? Do you have children? What, with your genes? Most probably cannot directly investigate, the kind of truth and dare, or the like.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 10:20 AM
3

😂😂
/r/MensRights22/04/24 10:16 AM
1

Next problem as mostly covert aroace.🙄 And instinctually they then even reject e.g. quarterbacks and regardless, if e.g. result of misuse of anabolics. Also no real psychological support for those men, it seems.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 10:15 AM
6

Why? What's the purpose of that? As they're a very severe problem.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 10:12 AM
3

Slmps!
/r/MensRights22/04/24 10:11 AM
-1

Why empty? Them evolved to need attention and especially being (very) strongly desired in order to be able to fall in love with their own emotions?🤔 Why codependent?
/r/MensRights22/04/24 10:09 AM
2

What about post wall or almost without eggs? Maybe it's more about hormones, emotions and anecdotally recently at least partly an ego thing? Wondering, if constructively talking about everything, but best guess and development she won't be into that?
/r/MensRights22/04/24 10:07 AM
2

Happened recently, trying to analyze. An ego thing came 2nd to mind. Overt approach post wall and growing desperation(?) and also impression she won't be into getting sensitovely lectured about everything or anything e.g. scientifically related? Women seem to operate on experience and what other women tell them? Confusingly really not into science and figuring themselves and "it" out and actually ultra few could.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 10:04 AM
1

Rag?🤔
/r/MensRights22/04/24 10:00 AM
5

Yes they also lie about at léast hypergamously "enforced" loneliness, too.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:23 AM
1

Good point on feminism which is female nature. They never learn.🙄 Figure only partly out when it's (almost totally) too late (the wall)?
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:22 AM
2

Common take had been there's no such thing as femcels. You probably mean especially those in hypergamous traps? Rejecting very many "ineligible" men?
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:19 AM
0

Around 18 BC, early Roman Empire under Caesar Augustus and some time in ancient Greece, too. No learning curve in men, though, again enacting and enforcing between very, extremely and ultra misandric laws, when co-evolved mechanisms already happen to be quite significantly "misandric", as that relevant paleolithical savannah habitat required to.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:14 AM
1

It also seems to still be a behavioural pattern of her.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 04:43 PM
1

And how she always messes up, it's a pattern, they don't learn?
/r/MensRights21/04/24 04:39 PM
2

And they're dangerous, those men enabling and enforcing all that madness!
/r/MensRights21/04/24 04:37 PM
1

And our dominance instinct! Their own group preference is 4.5 times larger!
/r/MensRights21/04/24 04:36 PM
3

Sounds like I'm experimenting with that? What my ex-fiancėe could be and actually is, but only partly. Apresential, not needy, the idea of it, her. Yes, they somehow never seem to change? Yes, fixing won't work, lack of authority.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 04:34 PM
1

We totally lack authority, they "do what they want". And all that irrational decision making was extremely stressful.🙄
/r/MensRights21/04/24 04:29 PM
3

Taylor Swift in decline?
/r/MensRights21/04/24 04:26 PM
1

Yes, solipsism, I'd been totally clueless about that. Messes up almost all discussions.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 04:23 PM
3

Gynocentrism own group preference of women gamma bias come to mind. All enabled and enforced by men, very unfortunately. Our dominance instinct becomes very detrimental there.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 06:29 PM
2

Women's own group preference is 4.5 times higher Gamma bias
/r/MensRights19/04/24 12:53 AM
2

Thank you! Yes, that'd been extremely shocking during my only oneitis. Parents, school, neurologists, lawyer, nobody warned me off, but rom-coms, movies, pop music and literature very severely messed up especially my subconscious. I'd call it an ultra good girl-dynamic, when already the good girl-dynamic IS supposed to be worst. And without women caring or loving what's supposed to be the rational of it? Only co-evolved and evolution, survival and reproduction, paleolithical savannah habitat ins…
/r/MensRights19/04/24 12:34 AM
-8

His sexual market value (SMV) is far too low for that, partly because of very needy slmps running it for very many men indirectly.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 09:42 AM
-2

It's all scientifically falsified lies! They cannot "love", but opportunistically!🙄
/r/MensRights18/04/24 09:37 AM
-2

What about (aro)ace, though?
/r/MensRights18/04/24 09:34 AM
2

All probably a giant macro shlt test?! What they can get away with?
/r/MensRights15/04/24 10:01 PM
15

Yes, always their mostly illogical and contradictive claims, totally unsubstantiated.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 12:13 PM
2

Thank you.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 05:46 PM
5

Data I read in a book from 2018.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 01:18 PM
2

Is HAG an abbreviation?
/r/MensRights10/04/24 01:14 PM
1

Absolutely!🙄
/r/MensRights10/04/24 01:13 PM
12

Those type of men partly enable and enforced that misandric situation.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 01:13 PM
21

Yes, extremely gender biased. Gamma bias! Even judges' not impartial, it finally might endanger society.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 12:31 PM
10

63% higher sentneces for men.🙄
/r/MensRights10/04/24 12:28 PM
2

😳
/r/MensRights10/04/24 12:27 PM
1

You're welcome!
/r/MensRights08/04/24 08:22 AM
3

Gamma bias is about several areas and issues women get treated (very) much better, even at court, despite exactly the same e.g. crime. Actually in general a massively flawed perception women get positively discriminated against for.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 07:57 PM
5

Women's own group preference evolved, that'll Always be very much stronger in them, when especially allosexual, heteroasexual men have dominance instinct and hierarchy because of our sex drive. Feeling in competition, that totally riggs gender competition, almost only experts know that.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 07:54 PM
0

Very surprising. It proves again that Red pill data partially seems to lack solid scientifical data.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 06:32 PM
1

Exactly, and, e.g. when totally clueless about women trying to mention some issue they really perceive it as "sounds crazy" or the like. Even if they're into you. Prevalence 0.08%, population > 5,000 (U.S.) women understanding red pill. Hypothesis: also hormones might severely interfere, maybe past menopause or with children they're more capable to get it?
/r/MensRights05/04/24 06:06 PM
1

Quite some experts are sure the former, it could be fatal bigender instinctual issue, think of all those slmps and white knights. Also all interests seem aligned against us and women have some 10 mln more votes counted in the U.S.. People not predominantly running on reason and logic is very scary!
/r/MensRights05/04/24 05:58 PM
7

Evolved empathy gap towards men!
/r/MensRights05/04/24 05:50 PM
5

The own group preference in women is 4.5 times ours Gamma bias
/r/MensRights05/04/24 05:49 PM
1

Thank you!
/r/MensRights05/04/24 05:47 PM
5

There's a full chapter in "Rise of men" by Manhood S. S. on exactly that, how it'd been intact e.g. until early 20th century still.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 10:07 AM
7

E.g. RP, yet anecdotally women asking why men normally don't show emotions. Main problem men seem way too much fixated on the perception by women.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 10:02 AM
6

Yes, #3 life regret suppressing emotions according to an australian study. Very interestingly best guess lack of sex, when watching all social media, actually isn't even mentioned. RP argues showing emotions, especially resignative weakness in men, will result in loss of attraction instinctually by women. Often sounds like bending over for women instead of being authentic.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 10:00 AM
1

Depends on how long and how severe and if and when it'd recover. Most probably way too many slmps corrupt everything!
/r/MensRights02/04/24 06:24 PM
4

Hypergamy, they have fewer men above them, like acadmics, they'd want to marry as they cannot love reciprocately, only opportunistically.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 07:54 PM
3

Yes, women always co-evolved with checks or regulations. Hence it's totally unnatural now.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 07:51 PM
7

Wasn't r/FDS about maliciously, planfully taking advantage of men, proliferating toxic strategies?
/r/MensRights01/04/24 07:48 PM
3

AWALT, might have partially worked over 20/!25 years ago, but not any more! See "Thinking Ape" (YouTube) on pass bros, several videos. Read "Rise of men" and "The manipulated man", by Dr. Esther Vilar!
/r/MensRights01/04/24 05:12 PM
2

Sexdolls and e.g.escorts suggest that interintimate interactions with women predominantly seem to be about projection into women as else they should be substitutive!
/r/MensRights01/04/24 05:09 PM
1

Yes, a multi-level exploitative structure!
/r/MensRights01/04/24 05:05 PM
11

Exactly, and bait and switch, too.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:56 PM
4

But e.g. risk of marriage proposals when men suffer e.g. from "falling in love" which is scientifically proven a very severe, temporary mental illness. In contrast to partly comparable bipolar's protective laws proof for deliberate male legal discrimination! It's set up rigged also there!
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:53 PM
11

Yes, WGTOW and femcels don't exist. Feminism being about female supremacy.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:50 PM
7

Yes, almost the only solution. Yes, Like r/FDS 😲
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:47 PM
6

Additionally the permanent risk of changing laws, too. So even after only very theoretical changes. Only abysmal downside and no upside.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:45 PM
57

Men shouldn't marry in order to topple the extremely misandric laws and system.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:37 PM
2

Those women would misuse the "collective beta male" as approximately 70% of taxes already used for them. That's very severe, not co-evolved for debasing of formerly needed individual male material support the 3 PC's), same with predominantly police what by far mostly only leaves parental Investment. Women seem totally ignorant about their incompetence and statistics on that also there. E.g. boasting about upbringing despite objective very severe issues, etc..
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:36 PM
2

They established sex negative? And sex positivity in the (late?) 1960s by extremistic feminists openly self-declaring as very severely mentally ill.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:26 PM
1

Yes, even scientifically ignorant women e.g. know "gynocentrism" and them claiming to not support or agree with (modern?) feminism really doesn't protect men. Predominantly men as enabler and enforcer the prerequisite of all of that, no learning curve in extremely many.🙄
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:23 PM
1

Yes, I was referring to today, women refuse to breed significantly more especially boys in order to be sacrificed in war, what's most obvious in Russia.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:19 PM
11

Dead on! And ever more expanding internationally. Even confronting tyrannies like China and Russia.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:56 AM
42

It's only pretence, they'd never been about men, Dr. Esther Vilar points out how they don't care about men, but as a toolnor utility.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:55 AM
6

Yes, and increasingly many only tactically claiming they aren't, but taking advantage of misandric laws gynocentrism. Men, despite many thousands of years still lacking a learning curve. Regulation and more of women seems a) Natural, as co-evolved for(!) and b) necessary to prevent female supremacy or tyranny. Socrates and Aristotle e.g. warned of equal rights leading to that!
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:53 AM
2

TERFs?
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:48 AM
20

And when they claim and even think they aren't they nevertheless take advantage of misandric laws and gynocentrism and will also still be influenced or manipulated by feminists or others. It's very much rather exposing female nature and it's not as if only feminism was the root cause, what experts point out it's not!
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:47 AM
4

Feminism: female nature in politics (or so)?
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:43 AM
6

Daddy issues might be relatively prevalent?
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:42 AM
11

They cannot love, but "opportunistically" exploit us, even without co-evolved with procreation. Hence nowadays for those literally unnatural exploitation. Dr. Esther Vilar elaborated about women having (much?) less emotions and why. Empathy gap (towards men).
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:39 AM
24

Feminism is about female supremacy, misandry and mutli-level exploitative societal, tax and legal structures!
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:33 AM
1

Yes, how shocking is that? Now Imagine totally clueless men, additionally e.g. oneitis and millionaire (me!). Hereditary despite chronic bipolar, broad autism phenotype, yet mensa level IQ and very low within 1th percentile neediness, but only physical, emotionally extremely more.🙄 Very severe oneitis, first love, no scientifical knowledge, too.🙄 I stupidly spontaneously proposed, she broke it up, even more clueless, 0.52 years later three marriage proposals by her(!), almost monthly, then three…
/r/MensRights27/03/24 02:23 PM
5

Hopefully!
/r/MensRights27/03/24 02:09 PM
2

Agreed,.yet even overt antinatalists or, better, post menopausal women, too? The former would go underground, opportunistically.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 08:15 PM
1

Maybe still paleolithical instincts, albeit absolutely no viable risk of extinction unlike for paleolithical tribes when women died or got robbed by neighbour tribes.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 08:13 PM
6

Consider the low birthrates, that's another reason that'd stop them from drafting women. Why privileging women who don't want to procreate or can't and more? Paleolithical instincts?
/r/MensRights26/03/24 12:18 AM
9

Schocking and nobody problematized it! Making female friends doesn't work when they're attracted to that man.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 12:15 AM
6

Yes. Could draft women at least for medical, inst, cooking, admin.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 12:13 AM
15

Or much more selective than women which turns the table and have them trying to qualify. Yet only works above their ever rising attraction threshold online. Or men finally really figuring women out protoscientifically and especially coming to terms emotionally, which is very more challenging.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 11:36 PM
1

Projection, as always!
/r/MensRights25/03/24 09:34 PM
2

Tik Tok: Any specific recommendations as I try to spread awareness and protect men.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 08:15 PM
2

My 1st girl-friend and ex fiancé is very high within 100th percentile light triad, but 0.60 years in she suddenly went "predatory", three marriage proposals, 3 for LTR, the former totally inconsistent with prior opinions, but massive oneitis had me emotionally "impaired" for years. Meaning objectively(!) partly near saint in behaviour (5.54 years in, so I'm accurate on that (ultra rare prevalence within women). Nevertheless simultaneously suddenly predatory, not sure planning to divorce gr@pe or…
/r/MensRights25/03/24 08:12 PM
1

Would you think, that it's men's default state, plain vanilla, to innately have an attraction floor of maybe 40% or 50% of all women? Most probably there's neither studies nor stats on it?
/r/MensRights25/03/24 07:58 PM
2

Women "love" (only) opportunistically, cannot love men reciprocately, like rom-coms movies pop music literature imply, suggest, basing only on the male concept of love.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 07:54 PM
3

Evolved, permanent "feed back loops", men and women permanently influenced each other since homo sapiens sapiens emerged.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 07:52 PM
69

Hypergamy Empathy gap Women cannot love men reciprocately, because co-evolved. I question the whole purpose and concept
/r/MensRights23/03/24 09:33 PM
1

Heureka!👍 That explains it! without hormones, infatuation no such thing, but with even temporarily perfection, but never IRL.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 07:52 PM
3

Overdemand! Too much attention. They aren't evolved for that.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 07:34 PM
1

Women cannot love men, but "opportunistically", as co-evolved! Never reciprocal, my subconscious refuses to adapt. What's the purpose of it, anyways? Given no procreation.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 07:30 PM
1

Is there a 3rd one?🤔 A statistician figured most of the caused several years ago, totally incompetent governments failed to. Btw we're nearing Peak population, it's about birth rate and should decline at least many decades, rather generations. Most important, before climate change. Yes, the take of several experts! Repeal the 19th amendment or respective votes, in the U.S. 9.9 mln more female votes 2016. And consider slmps, White Knights etc., shocking!
/r/MensRights23/03/24 06:12 PM
5

Yes, BPD seems horrible. C, years ago, I forgot, I couldn't identify anything specific my ex a nervous breakdown, I warned off, but for no avail. Might need surveillance, no neurologist. Mine is very high within 100% light triad, but maybe the coevolved empathy gap towards us men, probably all women.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 05:59 PM
3

Yes, all that bizarre entitlement.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 05:52 PM
1

Yes, soft rather than hard patriarchy, but no authority over them, no regulation or policing is dysfunctional. Gynocentrism, despite overpopulation, instinctual?
/r/MensRights23/03/24 05:35 PM
1

Yes, but risk of societally gradually decolving back, albeit maybe ultra slowly.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 05:32 PM
5

Yes, isn't it ultra shocking! Subconsciously knowledge doesn't work, ultra slow.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 05:31 PM
2

Yes, not giving up!
/r/MensRights23/03/24 05:28 PM
11

White Knights and the like partly enabling everything.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 05:26 PM
6

i tried to analyze, BPD seems falsified, but I remember perhaps C-cluster. Distance, law of propinquity, maybe the only way. Befriending doesn't work, videos suggest because of attraction. All that ultra high effort, human connection. As INTP, broad autism phenotype, some degree of Asperger's.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 05:22 PM
8

And very ugly from the inside, I'd coin "Medusa risk™". My ex girl-friend is very high within 100% percentile light triad, but after 5.53, 4.125 years after break-up finally emotionally suspicion wanted to divorce gr@pe me, intellectually I think I only needed several months, hence emotionally totally impaired over many years and not only no legal protection, but being exposed, especially as prey. Almost the need to become a profiler, but no authority, ultra frightening, a misandric ploy societa…
/r/MensRights23/03/24 05:19 PM
19

Very malicious. Borderline, wasn't she? And totally sure screwing him illegally over, genius tape, perfect documentation, but who else would work that extraordinarily good?
/r/MensRights23/03/24 04:39 PM
4

Delta IQ had also been rigged, exposed only 1994. Far from "almost the same", delta 4-5 IQ in 16 y/o, most probably significantly higher when older.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 04:35 PM
1

Good point! Even lesbian positive discrimination? Analyzing lesbian behaviour shows mutual instinctual attempts to take advantage of each other and almost 90% less sex than gay men, in between heterosexuals.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 04:33 PM
9

Dead on, (extremely?) weak men enable everything. Delta sex drive most probably the prerequisite.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 04:30 PM
6

A very severe issue legally is the polar opposite of legal protection e.g. during infatuation. Science characterizes falling in love unanimously as very severe temporary mental illness. Proof: comparison with bipolar's mania and extra enacted protective laws with very strict prerequisites. That blatant discrimination get's almost No public attention.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 04:25 PM
7

Artificial wombs will also be very challenging. And without mothers in the first 3 years probably ultra high mental, psychological issues. That seems to be their USP, objectively. Individually either no kids or e.g. surrogates.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 04:22 PM
8

Them on instinctual autopilot being another maybe fatal issue for society, resulting in extinction or similar.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 04:19 PM
20

Total abysmal lawmaker's and regulatory failure ignoring and denying female nature despite not only 12,000 years of civilizational empirical evidence what they're about and what happens when granted "equal" rights.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 04:17 PM
27

Gamma bias! That lawcase. Johnny Depp with perfect documentations, else he'd have been discriminated against and punished, but even with all proof no no brainer.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 04:14 PM
6

Planet of the Apes, women enslave men, what about cageing?😳
/r/MensRights23/03/24 04:11 PM
7

Women continously exposing female nature online which proves the catastrophic, most probably irreversible, fatal mistake, rewarding underserving women rights against not only 12,000 years of civilizationary experience. No learning curve!🙄
/r/MensRights23/03/24 04:09 PM
4

Apex fallacy! Women terming "men" never differentiate which of two groups of men.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 04:06 PM
7

Gross!😳
/r/MensRights23/03/24 04:05 PM
1

Sry, no native speaker, german, in Cyprus. Yes, I read "no permanence of emotions", like babies have no object permanence.🙄 Yes, illogical decision and falsifying and proofs didn't work and she had often two emotions, increasingly stressful, what about delegating reasonable behaviour? Mensa level.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 03:17 PM
1

Rereading "Rise of men" by "Manhood Shitty Shit", ofc cannot only not publish also videos on YouTube, else losing job and housing (application). Exposing anecdotal evidence get's severely punished.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 03:13 PM
1

They never differentiate between so-called alphas and beta males and questioned are clueless🤔. Societally a total male failure, not much unlike around 14 B.C. in Rome, no learning curve, but they cannot be regulated? Total lack of authority. "I do what I want!" ouvert threats!😳
/r/MensRights21/03/24 03:10 PM
1

Later on asking for her bodycount, but ofc not insensitive, ultra honestly as always "Now I don't say anything anymore (about that)". Ofc wrong answer, but I couldn't help emotionally, like for several years and nocody warned me off those hormones, like ever, but her(!), actually.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 03:06 PM
1

That's why I thought maybe (or probably) them temporarily getting protected, also from themselves, like in a monastery, at least for the very good ones. Ultra severe oneitis and having been totally clueless. Alpha widow-suspicion 🙄
/r/MensRights21/03/24 03:03 PM
1

So women voicing fear of getting ghosted seems to imply they'd been "run through"?😳
/r/MensRights21/03/24 03:00 PM
3

Ty. Yes, Bad phrasing, sry. I meant OP described a way women's parasitic ways get supported, i.e. having also "collective men" produce resources to get predominantly taxed off men to benefit anonymous, maybe really not deserving women. Thinking Ape (YouTube) coined it for that communistic, two person heteroasexual relationship. Opportunistic "love", I severely struggle, they cannot love reciprocately, emotionally very shocking.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 02:23 PM
4

Dead on!
/r/MensRights21/03/24 02:00 PM
4

Experts assessed parasitism, that won't make good feelings in their stomach, but with unknown prevalence seems accurate.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 01:59 PM
13

OP: dead on, manipulation, shaming, insult. Imagine asking what they bring to the table, or "only" investigating their body count.😳
/r/MensRights21/03/24 01:56 PM
1

Agreed, but child birth has very massively improved riskwise and more and more women opt to stay "childfree", but misandric laws and discrimination remain unchanged, an ultra feministic exploitation! But instinctually and emotionally there's no contraceptives, antinatalists play as if pronatalists, ho grotesque is that?
/r/MensRights21/03/24 01:26 AM
1

Breathing isn't enough!
/r/MensRights20/03/24 11:08 PM
4

Exactly!
/r/MensRights20/03/24 11:06 PM
2

No use in courting modern women!
/r/MensRights20/03/24 10:57 PM
3

Despite that attraction floor of 40% or 50% of all women.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 10:53 PM
3

Consider opting out, the only way to win is not to play (War Games, 1981)
/r/MensRights20/03/24 10:51 PM
1

Homo sapiens sapiens' enlarged neocortex resulted in ultra long upbringing as women's pelvis reached a limit, hence very premature birth. Also lower productivity during late pregnancy. During permanent struggle for survival that male emotional weakness co-evolved to force men to protect, provide and parent against men's self-interest! No such thing as gynocentrism in chimpanzees!
/r/MensRights20/03/24 10:43 PM
4

Yes, their self-image is aaid to remain unchanged, although they age out!🙄
/r/MensRights20/03/24 10:35 PM
295

No beta slaves!😳
/r/MensRights20/03/24 02:04 AM
3

Schicking, it's ever expanding, even with Ukraine
/r/MensRights19/03/24 10:55 PM
1

Wondering what's that called, when that minority in the east would be "war brides". Maybe it's very similar in the west, and nobody thought about that, but Ukraine needs those young women and children also demographically back.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 10:53 PM
10

Even in Ukraine, too? No fault divorce? During war?
/r/MensRights19/03/24 09:19 PM
2

Maybe that depends, how many children, how old, placeetc.? Culd often be consensual, too?
/r/MensRights19/03/24 09:17 PM
43

Already in summer of 2022, that's shocking.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 09:15 PM
6

That'll increasingly often happen and corrupt soldiers' motivation big time If they'd figure out about women now...😳
/r/MensRights19/03/24 09:13 PM
1

Homo sapiens sapiens' very large neocortex, See reply below. Atypical mating and upbringing in humans.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 06:59 PM
1

Homo sapiens sapiens' very large neocortex made that evolutionarily Impossible what Led to very much of atypical mating and upbringing, even covert ovulation and permanently "being in heat", when terming accordingly.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 06:58 PM
1

It's almost like a macro experiment and evolutionarily unparalleled. It falsifies social engineering and e.g. inauthentic marriages and relationships. People very rarely scientifically up to date.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 06:55 PM
1

It's quite confusing, those modern narratives and people seem to expect happiness which isn't backed scientifically (empirical data) or evolutionarily. Maybe messing up expectations? But one critisizm by experts e.g. was, If women really would (reciprocately) Love men they'd e.g. engage in I think it's termed head? But that's definitely individually different. Generally, experts are termig sex as modern religion.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 06:52 PM
1

It's anayzed in "Rise of men", chapter 2. Paramount it's paleolithical instinctual result in women, as it's very often. More specifically "resignative weakness", according to leading Red Pill take. Anecdotally my first girl-friend asked me why men wouldn't show emotions. As I involuntsrily suffered temporarily from emotional labilitity, else almost always noteworthily stoic even for lawyers' or bank or tax assessment, those hormones and Performance pressure and lack of scientific knowledge maybe…
/r/MensRights19/03/24 06:43 PM
1

All of that has women become totally unrealistic, often (very) entitled.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 03:09 PM
2

Yes, and as if very or extremely few seem to know or even reject or critically reflect it? When otherwise attraction isn't a choice, but anecdotally some feel compelled to act on everything.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 02:48 PM
2

Dead on e.g. for China and India. With that paleolithical, instinctual(?) cheap sperm, ultra valuable eggs, I wonder about no consideration for nowadays really no risk of extinction, some partly quite or very high population and procreation could be consistently argued against, at least being arbitrary. As if (almost?) everybody still predominantly running on paleolithical instincts, unable or unwilling to critically reflect or reject those? But probably it's about attraction isn't a choice and …
/r/MensRights18/03/24 01:24 PM
3

Excellent take!
/r/MensRights18/03/24 01:19 PM
-1

"Wrong" because of lack of reciprocity, when you'd e.g. like to research "Rise of men", by Manhood Shity Shit (pseudonym). His take not only there is very interesting and arbitrary. The total opposite could seem totally unnatural, doesn't it? But how to figure, if and when it could become (too) dangerous?
/r/MensRights18/03/24 01:04 PM
2

The probability of sex empirically depends extremely non-linearily on our SMV, looks, income, wealth, depends on women's age, they're into fun or money, it seems. And that threshold minimum SMV is ever rising since especially ubiquous smartphones after dating apps. Please See e.g. "Wheat Waffles" on YouTube for in-depth research and data in that.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 12:58 PM
5

Sex is supposed to be mutually beneficial and definitely no chore or gift by women, else it's probably much worse than ideally enthusiastic consent!
/r/MensRights18/03/24 12:52 PM
-1

Forced to comply "only" when maybe being too far from indifferent or even needy? Hence a misuse of that power dynamic! It's outright stupid. As if it's crowding out men for neediness(?) ordinal scale, and wealth/ income and looks on the other side. Women incapable, cannot love us, because co-evolved, that's most probably worst, isn't it? What's the point of it then, anyway? But when you're e.g. ultra strongly infatuated, unconditionally🙄...
/r/MensRights18/03/24 12:21 PM
1

Obvious inequality: that occassional tueing the table most probably only works with maybe 8+/10 Looks and or being quite/ very rich, but who'd consciously be into buying her and what'd that mean? But as If quite many or more go for it anyway? Them messing up the dating Market and women!
/r/MensRights18/03/24 12:16 PM
1

Worthy of them: Despite ultra strong first infatuation I later intuitively had her try proving being different enough, naively increasingly desperately hoping for NAWALT. (Extremely stressful, no fun at all). Analytically and personally totally turning the table, despite extremely dangerous unconditional love (why have I never been warned off it, like ever?). They even do propose for marriage, if softly turned down (no break-up), then for LTR. Finally getting rejecting, suspicion finally, after …
/r/MensRights18/03/24 12:11 PM
-1

Entertain her at the restaurant. Probably broad autism phenotype, "little" monologues didn't go that well, although I really thought everything was eine. And interesting topics, probably only for me?🤔
/r/MensRights18/03/24 12:03 PM
0

Hence getting asked out by women seems (very?) rare. Happened to me, also getting approached. Unknown number of others who probably considered or die diligenced, but covertly. Even twice rejected, increasingly after one asked me out, although I didn't explixitly went after it, hence they can do everything on their own, asking out, vetting, rejecting and both hadn't been my type. So, they can, but don't want to, fear rejection.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 12:01 PM
1

They term it "female principle", i.e. being passive. Their fear of rejection! As if they have a hard time near and post "wall", when at least normally demand should only permanently decrease, but they're said to be unable to figure and their self-Image is said to remain near their peak looks. Also hypergamy, them said to be unable, at least unwilling to adapt to their ever declining SMV and them unable to expect for that(?)
/r/MensRights18/03/24 11:56 AM
5

Yes, feminism weaponised hatred against men and women, even those not agreeing, nevertheless taking advantage of all results.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 05:07 PM
2

When in reality women co-evolved to exploit men, that permanent struggle for survival. Them (also) still predominantly running on those paleolithical instincts, even e.g. when planfully not procreating which had been almost the only reason it co-evolved.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 05:03 PM
37

Misandric, discrimination of men.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 08:21 PM
8

Dead on! And everything social engineering and a total lie, also scientifically! Experts elaborate about how women can't Love men reciprocately, yet where are explicit warnings of that, like ever?
/r/MensRights14/03/24 05:01 PM
1

Wanting to be loved proves lacking scientifical knowledge about co-evolved, non-reciprocal, so-called "love"! That's very paramount!
/r/MensRights14/03/24 04:57 PM
8

Not according to a few locals reporting in male spaces online! See "Islam is right about women" by Colttaine on YouTube for that!
/r/MensRights08/03/24 08:41 PM
6

Red Pill and MGTOW findings remain! Rereading "Rise of men" again, very recommendable.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 08:39 PM
1

Very shocking!
/r/MensRights29/02/24 04:23 PM
2

Yes, not co-evolved for, like almost at all.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 06:34 PM
1

I.e. they didn't expect it may sink?
/r/MensRights12/02/24 11:24 PM
3

Innate, co-evolved paleolithical instinct!
/r/MensRights10/02/24 06:13 PM
1

Weren't they obliged to have more lifeboats, but failed, maybe on purpose? Against law or rule.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 06:12 PM
3

Paleolithical instincts! Threat of survival of the tribe e.g. because of a fight, that'd been the reason and it didn't change, despite overpopulation.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 06:06 PM
4

Titanic, e.g..
/r/MensRights10/02/24 06:01 PM
2

Ty, that's sophisticated.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 05:55 PM
1

47.18 y/o dating a 28.31 y/o resulted in three unwanted, unqualified female remarks. "I don't have to.bother with older women!" spontaneous reply and absolute silence, like for ever! They're really full of shlt....!
/r/MensRights10/02/24 05:51 PM
1

Anecdotally not only older women, but Most porbably for the most part.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 05:48 PM
3

When he's the only one implementing an impressively reasonable strategy. Legendary breaking up with Nina Agdal, because she already turned 25, that requires at least stomach....👍
/r/MensRights10/02/24 05:45 PM
2

Halo effect, maybe, yet only for those deemed (very) attractive with looks.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 05:43 PM
2

That "woman are wonderful effect" or bias, forgot the phrase.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 05:41 PM
2

It could empirically correlated with actual or perceived pockets of up to relevant incompetent, irrational behaviour by suchbvery young or young women. Them predominantly running on instincts and emotions instead of reason and logic. It'd also deconstruct that weird claim of equality that'd never hold water, like ever. When practically that depends very much, but there seem to be some grain of truth and sufficient inconpentence in quite some young women y else it'd make no sense.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 05:40 PM
5

Dead on! Actually it's a multi-level exploitative, socially engineered structure, discriminating against men for absolutely no rational reason, but that there's never enough resistance and backlash. Only solution seems avoiding more or less all that!
/r/MensRights10/02/24 05:28 PM
1

Same anecdotally, too. Why when over 30? The ancient greek figured delts attractiveness and that natural age gap out, see Rollo Tomassi's graph of sexual marketplace value (SMV). Women peak at 23 y/o [rather a bit earlier!], men ideally around 38/ 39 y/o, hence Delta some 15/ 16 years. Practical experience when only delta 18.86 years younger: I got without any reason verbally attacked by three women and intuitively pointed out I don't have to bother with any older women. Immediately expected som…
/r/MensRights10/02/24 05:20 PM
1

Dead on! And oppression and patriarchy are never defined or explained, like ever. Hard patriarchy or soft patriarchy and hadn't that been bronze age, in antiquity?
/r/MensRights10/02/24 03:23 PM
1

Past behaviour predicting future behaviour. And they'd been co-evolved with on average an maybe 168 people paleolithical tribe and that savannah habitat and do still predominantly run on instinctual auto pilot. Mustn't even hypothesize that in quite some not only subreddits.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 03:18 PM
1

CLC would be a coining. Anecdotally they invent very weird first names for cats. Reason being them being childless? And even If married or partnered, let that sink in. Implicit prove how they really aren't into men "that much" and it's all co-evolved, it seems.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 03:07 PM
1

Because of overdemand and them probably often lacking enough e.g. oxytocin receptors, also leading to promoscuitive behaviour in mountain voles. They manipulated that and they became monogamous!
/r/MensRights10/02/24 02:59 PM
1

Yes, there's never a specification or differentiation or explanation, like ever.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 02:57 PM
1

Counterfeit?🤔 Non-native speaker here.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 02:54 PM
0

It's what they'd be able to do, the potentiality, very much rather than what specific women did or would or might do!
/r/MensRights10/02/24 02:52 PM
2

Dead on! Empathy gap for men usery, "loving" opportunistically, as has been co-evolved, but kept secret until recently.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 02:51 PM
1

It's said to be the so-called empathy gap. Anecdotally women deny it or aren't aware of it. Yes, and especially when (very) introverted and/ or first girl-friend and especially when suffering from some mental illness, like depression, bipolar or others. That massively multiplies sulclde rates. That stoic narrative can be reasoned for paleolithical, neolithical and partially ancient habitats especially. Practically it won't be necessary, yet women predominantly running on instincts and emotions a…
/r/MensRights10/02/24 02:49 PM
2

AHS?
/r/MensRights10/02/24 02:40 PM
1

Most probably only very massive personal failure and them continuing to deconstruct the narrative and self-expose their ways online might over time lead to some correction. Needy, addicted, weak men, raised by single mothers, enable and facilitate that madness, too.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 02:36 PM
1

Dead on! Anecdotally Impression grew they (very) often do project? As co-evolution is about reproduction and survival also that won't be negatively selected for. Impression being cultural evolution ofc couldn't yet have been adopted to, hence my working hypothesis, the more different from that paleolithical savannah habitat, the less it'll fit. As they're said to run on auto pilot some 90% of the time. Led by instincts and emotions.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 01:46 PM
2

I've totally opted out of society with the exception of mandatory needs and filings, etc..
/r/MensRights19/01/24 08:21 PM
0

Yes
/r/MensRights13/01/24 04:51 PM
2

Women not being into men's personality or character. Co-evolved usery and exploitation, even without the prerequisite of reproduction= ultra feministic behaviour.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 01:22 PM
2

Extremely shocking! 😳
/r/MensRights31/12/23 01:18 PM
5

End structural discrimination of men in many ways, fight gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 12:27 AM
3

Proves how misandric laws don't even provide for protection of disabled men. Ultra shocking, remebering female teachers raping pupils, too.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 06:34 PM
2

Dead on, OP!
/r/MensRights06/12/23 05:21 PM
1

Passport bros have been already falsified very long ago as e.g. Thinking Ape elaborated on. Practically since maybe some 20 years and primarily also universal f. nature.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 04:18 PM
3

Empathy gap!
/r/MensRights28/11/23 10:58 PM
1

Sounds like "there's no relationship equity", as e.g. Thinking Ape, Barbarossa and Rollo would point out. Societally and with the media it's also that up to extreme misrepresentation of women. Even several experts also report having had to deprogram subconsciously like happened with me, too.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 10:51 PM
1

Very many seem to have been at least subconsciously indoctrinated, even when some claim not agreeing with feminism. In general it's also that ever growing distinction between instinctual still relevant paleolithical (old stoneage) environment and cultural modernity. Still massive lack of e.g. scientific knowledge and information about that Additionally women also aren't co-evolved to even already feel having potential or outright power over men, as many decades of declining female happiness, des…
/r/MensRights28/11/23 10:47 PM
7

Socrates, Aristotle and e.g. Cato the elder had been dead on. If men enable women with supposedly equal rights, they'd become our masters. Voltaire: "If you want to know who rules over you, look who you're not allowed to critisize." Protection of men should or must have been secured at least mostly in every nations constitution, but we almost totally lack viable support, like at all. Even e.g. worse than nature, the environment, flora and fauna.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 07:44 PM
19

It's the so-called empathy gap. Along with delta sexual desire another cornerstone in partial gynocentric male multifactorial exploitation, discrimination and oppression.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 07:31 PM
1

Also anecdotally quite some significant risk of usery at the detriment of men, i.e.. Somehow never publically problematized. Experimentally men suspicious of that might also try to refrain from practically entering into some relationship which probably not that seldomly could be called compulsory (hetero)sexual. Also anecdotally suspicion grows that supposedly only myth, they're against being objectified and despite seem instinctively want and expect to be desired. Practically so-called tertiary…
/r/MensRights25/11/23 07:01 PM
6

OP is dead on!
/r/MensRights25/11/23 06:40 PM
42

Typo bottom 95% of MEN
/r/MensRights24/11/23 11:01 PM
8

It shows lack of authenticity.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 07:08 PM
16

Dead on, it's debunking them.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 07:06 PM
13

Indifference seems best
/r/MensRights30/05/23 07:05 PM
7

Structural exploitation and usery.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 07:04 PM
30

Precisely
/r/MensRights30/05/23 07:03 PM
1

No
/r/MensRights10/03/23 08:15 PM
1

Exactly
/r/MensRights07/03/23 12:49 PM
1

Wouldn't it need much lower temperature?
/r/MensRights07/03/23 12:49 PM
2

Proves gynocentrism, misandry and how male instincts indirectly lead to enabling and enforcing that.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 12:47 PM
1

Lower
/r/MensRights03/10/22 03:24 PM
2

Excessive misandry
/r/MensRights03/10/22 03:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter