TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mavlis Archive

View 0 posts and 44 comments by Mavlis on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Maybe, but the unfortunate downside is that the lawyer has to be provided at the students' expense - which is a massive expense for anyone not part of a well-to-do family.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 03:09 PM
5

The advent and prevalence of male circumcision was, entirely, an issue to reduce sensitivity - though, like Magnut said, primarily to reduce masturbation. The two processes are exactly the same, and while their effectiveness may differ - the only true difference is the relative social acceptance of male circumcision to female circumcision. The myth that circumcision was done for health reasons was made up after the fact as a way of rationalizing. Only in very extreme cases could circumcision pos…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 02:59 PM
3

The point being that the original response is that you are, quite literally, scarred for life. You're interpreting it as emotional - and while the emotional damage is hard to quantify (particularly in that it's hard to miss something that you never remember having) the scar is quite literal and quite blatant.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 02:45 PM
3

I think this approach is a very fair and correct way to do it. Ban it for minors, if grown-up men want to get it done, that's fine with them. But it is an irreversible process that can permanently alter someone's life for no reason, before they have any time to input the process.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 02:43 PM
8

I agree - this is something that all sides of any equal rights argument need to keep in mind. There are downsides for almost any group in certain situations - I always hear the "you're a X, you have no right to complaint, Y have it worse here". I see it a lot in MensRights - very anti-women sentiments in that women have perks in everything. They are discriminated against sometimes too, but that doesn't mean that men aren't discriminated against in many cases, too, though. Often in many cases, bo…
/r/MensRights15/02/11 10:23 PM
1

This article leaves out a lot of information that is very important: What is the ratio, in total, of males to female entries at the very base end of the pool in terms of gender? I have nothing to base this on other than knowledge that, typically speaking, males tend to be attracted to and flourish more in competitive conditions - that there is a significant gender gap in terms of number of entrants into the entire competition by males. When I was in high school I attended speech and debate tourn…
/r/MensRights04/02/11 02:55 PM
6

The thing that annoys me the most, is that repealing the health care law is made out as if it will disproportionately affect women - and this is obvious political leveraging as anyone in their right mind who actually reads all of the talking points realizes that there's realistically one - and at most, two - of her bullet points that are issues that have anything to do with gender at all. To me, it sends the message that the representative is trying to make something out that is not sexist into …
/r/MensRights20/01/11 07:16 PM
3

I agree with you on this - some of the negative responses are a little silly and it seems that you're being jumped on for being a woman. As a straight guy, I wouldn't date a girl who was a mooch off of me, either. If I'm going to work and bring home and income, so are they. I don't expect money brought to always be equal, but barring an understandable inability to do so, we're both going to be full time workers and that's all there is to it. I don't care whether or not she's rich, but she's not …
/r/MensRights19/01/11 03:10 PM
1

Hm, well - I'll bite and be honest, I might date an unemployed woman, but I wouldn't get in a serious relationship with an unemployed woman - unless, of course, she happened to be in school or something along those lines. While I understand that finding a job isn't exactly the easiest thing in the world, and I wouldn't leave someone if they became unemployed - I also wouldn't be willing to take on the financial responsibility for someone else if they couldn't at least take part of the load as we…
/r/MensRights19/01/11 02:57 PM
2

The interesting thing is that a is correct, but I don't think b is. From what I recall, what you said is an outward perception from the victim and not an inward perception from the perpetrators. The top signs to make you get mugged are looking unsure, lacking confidence, appearing socially inept, etc. are what make you the most inclined to get robbed. Though this may seem similar to vulnerability, it's not quite the same thing. In essence, being nervous and afraid that you're going to get robbed…
/r/MensRights05/01/11 09:58 PM
6

This is incredibly true. One of the things I've always hated is hearing the debate about equal rights in something like sports. Hopefully I won't get down voted for this - but I suppose it might prove the topic right, so it'll be interesting either way. Anyhow, I'll use the NFL as an example - there is the widely publicized "Rooney Rule" that requires NFL teams to interview at least one black (maybe minority?) candidate, because black people are disproportionately underrepresented (percentage of…
/r/MensRights31/12/10 09:53 PM
4

In other words you believe that a kid that gets arrested for loitering deserves to be raped right?
/r/MensRights16/12/10 11:20 PM
3

I appreciate you taking this stance. This has been a topic that has long been my own debate with people along this very topic. Women have all the power in this situation - including the power to make the man legally responsible for his actions. I fully and wholly agree with the options you gave him. I know that there is an unfortunate truth that a man can't always have full and total power to force a woman to have an abortion so long as it is morally objectionable and has the potential to be phy…
/r/MensRights16/12/10 02:33 PM
-1

I don't really buy this modern day interpretation, I'm sorry. Maybe I've just never seen it done "properly" but my step-mom was a stay at home mom, and she did cooking and cleaning and general talking care of, of which she spent 2-3 hours a day on. It's just not that much. No one pays me extra to cook my own meals and clean my own house and taking care of myself. If you don't work, you don't have to magically not do those things. If the woman is trying to claim that she spent 20 years working as…
/r/MensRights19/11/10 02:00 PM
2

I'll be fair here - while I'm aware you're not saying this, people that wouldn't get married without alimony aren't necessarily the ones that get married to get alimony. It's kind of like saying that people who wouldn't drive a car of insurance wasn't required are just looking to commit insurance fraud (the analogy is a little bit off, but you get the idea).
/r/MensRights19/11/10 01:57 PM
5

Agreed to the reasonable response. However - I do think there should be a maximum. Not having to work is a privilege, not a right. I think that a maximum of two years is reasonable - you can't expect someone to keep supplementing someone else's poor decision. Choosing not to work and to not prepare yourself for a situation in which you may need to work is a poor decision and we shouldn't reward those people for those decisions for an unreasonable amount of time.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 01:52 PM
1

I don't disagree that arguments of these types tend to be laden with hypocrisy - again, I think the sentiment of how the verdict is handled depends on the context. If she says "Are you jewish?" and he says "Yes." - I think he deserves a degree of blame, though it's probably only justified as morally wrong. Lying to a person isn't a crime, and I do aknowledge that - but like I said, it's hard to say what is-and-isn't a reasonable amount of effort on your part. The one difference I will acknowledg…
/r/MensRights17/11/10 09:59 PM
1

Hm, well, though I understand that not everyone thinks this way and it's not really like I'm going to be on a jury - I still see a significant difference between the two. One is consent given in the context of a lie, something along the lines of fraud - the other is consent given and then attempted to be retracted on the basis that they weren't pleased with the outcome. I'm not trying to make an excuse for it - but they are still differently. There are really two sides to the "If I had known X, …
/r/MensRights17/11/10 09:05 PM
9

I think that retroactively revocable consent as mentioned by the author is an editorialized comment that is taken out of context. This isn't something Canada has done, this is something the author has convinced himself that feminists in general want - and that this, specific woman (in this case) appears to be doing. But let's look at the facts regarding what he states: Although she later recanted her testimony, the judge still sentenced the man to jail for having sex with an unconscious person. …
/r/MensRights17/11/10 02:50 PM
1

I think that, like it or not, it has to be the woman's choice whether or not to have an abortion. There're just no two ways about it. However, I think that if the man does not want the child, and the woman still wants it - he should be able to sign away his rights to any parental rights of the child and the woman has it, and he is not legally responsible for it. I also think that if the woman does not want to have the child, but the man does - if she is willing to take the pregnancy to term, she…
/r/MensRights05/11/10 02:05 PM
2

This is sad, but true. We've really been trained to think that looking at pornography and masturbating, etc. etc. are this awful thing. Masturbation and pornography are one of those really interesting states where regardless of how widely they are used, most still vehemently deny them. I'm not going to deny that there are people that don't look at pornography - and there are possibly people that don't masturbate... But we need to stop conveying the belief that people that look at porn, or mastur…
/r/MensRights20/09/10 03:15 AM
4

A very interesting set of statistics is presented in, interestingly enough, the race-based section (Warning it's a PDF) that's attempting to highlight the education disparity between the races. It's interesting, though, that there is a much wider disparity by gender that is totally ignored. It's the percentage of students receiving A to C grades in England. Whites - Girls: 69, Boys: 60 Asian - Girls 73, Boys 63 Black - Girls 65, Boys 52 Mixed - Girls 68, Boys 59 Chinese - Girls 88, Boys 77 Other…
/r/MensRights12/09/10 12:42 AM
3

It could be a grudge. It could be mental illness. It's hard to say. In my opinion it's always best to think back to the way our justice system is truly supposed to operate: Innocent until proven guilty. Breaking the law to get away from someone who (to my knowledge, but I'm not really going to do in-depth research on this) does not have any sort of criminal record or history of anything... To me, points to something wrong on the mother's part, and not the father's part.
/r/MensRights04/09/10 11:02 PM
2

There's a reason it's in quotations. I was essentially saying that what you quoted is the female equivalent of what he was saying.
/r/MensRights28/08/10 11:04 PM
5

You see, once again you resort to ad homs and shaming language without ever addressing the argument I made. I'm not sure how many times I have to state that I have absolutely no problem with the argument you made. I merely have a problem with the way you are saying it. I assume you have the intelligence to look for some information on these issues, and in that I have miscalculated, so I apologize. I assumed you actually had any interest at all in gender equality - in that miscalculation - I woul…
/r/MensRights28/08/10 05:11 AM
5

True - but if men didn't prefer sticking their penises in whatever vagina would receive them, there would be no "pressure" for women to be selective - speaking from a reproductive standpoint. What's changed is neither men nor women, but the fact that sex without the concern of reproduction - which is a very recent thing to do safely.
/r/MensRights28/08/10 04:56 AM
3

The thing is, though, that it's not like we can't look as far as the vast majority of sexual-based reproduction in mammals and not surmise that there is a scientific explanation for -why- women have so much power in choosing a mate and -why- they are naturally predisposed to be more selective of their mates. Women have a much more limited window in reproduction than men for multiple reasons. One, as far as I know (and I don't profess this part to be fact) they are fertile for a shorter portion o…
/r/MensRights28/08/10 04:54 AM
3

I think you said one thing and then totally flipped on what you said between posts and then accused him of doing it, too. You said: feminist groups were orginally set out to settle inequalities where they felt women were not getting enough attention/equality. So why would they focus on men? That makes no sense what so ever. And then he said: Either Feminism is about Gender Equality, or they are about Women. You can't argue out of both sides of your mouth. ... But then you turned around and said:…
/r/MensRights28/08/10 03:16 AM
1

Yeah, for sure. The unfortunate thing in life is that it is far easier to take the easy, dismissive and ignorant way out. And people that do this very frequently reinforce each other for doing this, so they're able to convince themselves that they're right.
/r/MensRights28/08/10 02:35 AM
4

What you are arguing against....again...is the STYLE of my argument, instead of it's SUBSTANCE. That is not something that I've arrived at for no reason. I used to be 'reasonable'. It got me ignored. I got pissed off, and I started getting results. Which would YOU call more effective? Yes, I am arguing the style of your argument. I even said in my very first response to you that I agreed with the point you were making that the word Patriarch causes the reader to immediately think male dominated …
/r/MensRights28/08/10 02:25 AM
6

The way you're expressing your opinion, you are pretty much coming across as the male equivalent of what you're saying is so bad about feminism. If you're going to see a feminist agenda in everything, then you're just as guilty as a woman who says "Pay attention to how often the word "Porn star" and "Sex" come up in an "anti-feminist" debate. Are you naive, or just unwilling to admit that all men want is to use women for sex?" My mom cried all the time. My dad never cried in front of me. He woul…
/r/MensRights27/08/10 09:51 PM
2

The most surprising issue to me was that I had no idea that there was the entire industry backing of reselling it. For the majority of my life I just attributed this as being a mistake that comes with scientific myths and that it would phase out now that information is coming out that the line of thinking is untrue. I honestly didn't even know for sure that I had been circumcised until I was in my late teens. I thought that some people just had larger foreskins than others the same way such a th…
/r/MensRights27/08/10 08:06 PM
2

While I understand your point, I think people having children is one of those things that is overall societally beneficial. I don't think we should penalize people for doing something that is for the betterment of society. Look at it this way: Every time someone has to leave early because they have to pick up their kid, you are suffering a detriment to this. Your company makes less money whenever some sort of child related emergency comes up on their end in which they have to spend half a day at…
/r/MensRights27/08/10 07:18 PM
4

Here's the problem with the term patriarchy: it sets up the belief that it is a society set up by men to oppress non men. Regardless of whether or not that's the true definition of the term, unfortunately that's the sentiment that it evokes to many people - obviously including yourself. True, or not - I agree with your sentiment that using the term patriarchy is a word that's sure to whip someone who believes that males are deliberately oppressing males into a frenzy and it has entirely differen…
/r/MensRights27/08/10 07:11 PM
6

I highly disagree that it's primarily women with which the social pressure of being a "real man" comes from. However, I do agree in that think perhaps people are misguided in really calling it a patriarchy - I think calling it that intentionally leads you to believe that we are a "male dominated" society. It's very interesting to me, that people hate having other people speak on their behalf, because they're not convinced that another person will adequately express their beliefs - while at the s…
/r/MensRights27/08/10 06:09 PM
5

I think radical feminists have always realized this. The only thing is that they can just as easily take a logical twist and say "Of course they do because they're the woman that acts submissive and turns herself into a sexual object exactly the way they want her to." I agree with your point - but I'm just saying - at some point you have to realize that whatever means you try to convince someone by, your words can be very easily twisted into something that's totally opposite of what you meant.
/r/MensRights27/08/10 06:04 PM
20

There is a difference between the way you see it going in your head and the way it might actually play out. What probably actually happens is the people turn around and label you a sexist for making jokes about beating women. And rather than try to figure out what's going on, people will avoid you "just to be safe". Then no one talks to you, you get bad reviews, people start looking down on things you do because of this, and your work becomes miserable. While I'm not saying people shouldn't say …
/r/MensRights26/08/10 01:40 AM
6

Agreed. Worst case scenario nothing happens - but that's going to happen anyways, if you don't say anything. What's the harm in saying something? Especially if you just drop off an anonymous letter - they won't be able to dismiss it as just some angry guy on his way out.
/r/MensRights26/08/10 01:38 AM
1

Well, I think the notion of assigning individual teachers to sub-groups of students is a significant problem. As we have relatively quick ways to set up instant meetings with teachers that are cheap (laptops and web cameras are cheap now), you can still have a ratio of 10 students to 1 teacher, but on a much more macro level. You can have 1000 students with 100 teachers. Online course work through pod-casts and ebooks that can be reviewed and gone back over at the student's pace rather than havi…
/r/MensRights25/08/10 03:55 AM
6

Agreed. While there are some good points in here - the added commentary and off-base comments really water it down and make it easy to roll your eyes and call this guy a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights25/08/10 03:41 AM
2

Well, the theory has everything to do with teaching methodology, too - the point though is that since we're so concerned with cost effectiveness we teach to teach as many students as we possibly can with as little money as we can - fuck the ones that are too dumb to understand and the ones that are too smart can suck it up and enjoy their "easy A". I'm not saying it's a good system, and I agree that "average" is very hard to peg. I think it's a case of people applying the logic of "Well, I got a…
/r/MensRights25/08/10 02:55 AM
3

The cost of education is in no way reflective of the pay of the teachers. Your first link is stating the relative inflation-adjusted cost of education as a whole. The issue is that the cost is going up but the teacher pay is remaining stagnant or going down - this leads to fewer people getting into teaching professions, and they are more the bastion of those who want stability more so than anything else. The money is going to creating extra administrative positions, paying for overpriced and out…
/r/MensRights24/08/10 11:25 PM
3

While I won't deny that our education system is woefully inadequate - I do agree with the mindset of many that first world countries have first world problems. As horrendous as our education system may be - and regardless of whether or not it could be better - it could also be worse. I totally agree that our education is in drastic need of a massive overhaul and that we could do way better - and it does appear that there is a negative trend in our education system. But a large number of us are p…
/r/MensRights24/08/10 10:17 PM
3

One interesting theory that I remember seeing (I don't recall the source off the top of my head) was that males were far more prone to being non-average when it comes to intelligence. What I mean by this is that despite having a very similar overall average in IQ levels - men tend to, at a much greater portion, be either above or below average. But school is tended to teach average. In general, this is manifests itself as if you're above the curve, you act out because you're bored. If you're bel…
/r/MensRights24/08/10 05:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter