TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MaxiMuscli Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by MaxiMuscli on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yeah, masking is what NTs do and autists struggle with and hence notice. Psychologists emphasize the importance of pretend play, and in their diagnostic manuals the absence thereof in autistic subjects.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 03:24 PM
1

I didn’t get the shy sensitive kind of autism: having no social skills voided me of anxiety, as it relieved me of feelings in specie (alexithymia), and with some psychologically founded premeditation of neurotypical thinking patterns allowed impertinence, cheekiness and finishing law school at your age—anything where your record is upheaved for verbalizing that which others, more so or as much, have trouble sticking to, while you can avail yourself of repetitive and restricted behaviours unmoved…
/r/MensRights28/01/25 03:18 PM
1

You are a right philosopher. On the wider market it is not a conscious concept, let alone catchword to create any illusion.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 06:01 PM
-5

Might be because you are annoying, but perhaps it is just me. What do you mean with mental heatlh problems? It’s not likely they are easily spotted. If they are, then most people are out of clue how to treat you. The default is that a man is more dangerous than a woman, so if we compare two with like mental illness then you might be more likely to attempt to comfort the woman if you are normie, she will be statistically more likely to be more sociable, and at the same time benefit from social in…
/r/MensRights22/05/24 06:58 AM
1

This is basically a conspiracy theory. Stop such uninvited gynophobia, it is the same unbalanced view promoting misandry. Female therapists can well do their job right. The individual therapist is not the majority. Instead of toxic masculinity, precisely they have to be concerned about normative male alexithymia, we had it the other day. In as much as men are less likely to conceptualize their feelings, not because of a chimera like toxic masculinity or toxic feminity but because of neglectful o…
/r/MensRights29/01/24 12:40 PM
2

No. Compare online prostitution with online casinos, where there is no control whether you can win something and only the influencer streaming about the digital slot machine was framed to win. Online prostitution is an accurate term because if these performers offered meatworld contacts then the customers would take it with the same mindset, thus you see the relation. Other than that there all kinds of traders, even for drugs: one takes advantage of weaknesses, the other enhances parties or over…
/r/MensRights15/01/24 01:15 AM
-4

Currently my time is quite cheap, so I drop you a few more concepts, to besweeten your time hopefully. Others are their whole lives cheap on it. You might see my contribution history, it is there for the public to learn, I see in your comments that you got the same problem. People just got serious problems concerning theory of mind, to discern what really motivates other people: it is an expensive, tiring task heavy on the cerebrum while the cerebellum is faster in however black and white enemy-…
/r/MensRights02/01/24 05:19 AM
6

It means “I’m special, go grab me by the pussy catch me”. As with some certain online prostitutes succeeding by abusing men, you know the examples with 23, it works. Caveat here because I am neither American nor allistic nor a user of the relevant social media and it quite seems like telediagnosis: there is a lot going on there in partying women’s heads.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 04:59 AM
15

It’s very unfair, but there are two ways to put it. In feminist language, woman is discriminated again, while man could just take a gander and think “peng & dumb“ due to all the T. That’s like most interaction of men and women on the sexual market. We may ask them out and they are like “ick”; who discriminates who? Men are biased in favour of women, we had it the other day, and now we are disrespected for it.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 04:44 AM
3

Right, there is just ordinary unintelligence to observe. People can’t even read. When I tried to make my attempts at conspiracy theories, which I hold in esteem as a literary genre training the intellect, more elaborate, self-identified jokester users on subreddit LowStakesConspiracies are unimpressed, as they prefer the shallow jokes, and accuse me of taking stances that were neither jocularly nor seriously implied; also block after asking questions, obviously because their attempts to make out…
/r/MensRights02/01/24 04:33 AM
1

I have been motivated by your answer to find a pure non-political and non-economical reason, within the art itself. Please review my racism and conspirationism.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 01:06 AM
1

We have to look at the kind of people who use cameras make (motion) pictures. There is a pure technical fascination to try to capture both dark and white stuff in an image. At least historically, it was a feat to have correct lighting and diaphragms for the light exposure and to allow to see anything at all in the resulting image one used grey cards. So I think it is a generational problem and when the boomers will be gone porn will have a fairer distribution of ethnicities and you will well see…
/r/MensRights02/01/24 01:02 AM
2

More like it was a “lookism” term, at a time when the incel community was not discernibly separated.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 04:09 PM
2

Pretty sure they borrowed from the seduction community. Also one always has to sound one way or the other, a large part of the discussion is framing, where one has to borrow concepts from different perspectives, so the short statements here are by far not enough to extrapolate an ideology.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 03:49 PM
3

First mistake: Engaging in logics when gynocentrism is driven by maladaptive sentiment. Debates become circular if people don’t realize they don’t act on a logical level, but as needs to be told autists to perform upon it at all, framing and social proof, or in other words motivation to stay within certain structures, are stronger. Doesn’t mean rational thinking doesn’t exist, but one must be willed to learn and employ it. Unfortunately the last two generations have unlearned motivation due to p…
/r/MensRights22/12/23 12:59 PM
1

Because feminist-controlled education system sweeps the worst of humanity together in schools. Men would support each other if they had time developing themselves. Instead they get their childhood stolen by undergoing so-called education in school.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 12:52 PM
1

Because it is defined non-symmetrically, for etymological relations in some Afro-American communities not exactly clear. You could likewise ask why women are shamed as sluts and men are not: because male sluts are a contradiction and only analogical concept, one employs other terms for men than for women, as a consequence of distinguishing them at all.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 02:29 PM
1

You were abused, and then gaslighted. Unfortunately, unless we invent a time machine, twenty years later the misled personalities cannot be made up anymore. Have you ever heard of statutes of limitations or prescription? For instance in my legal system, after twenty years no crime could be persecuted after twenty years, until they changed it in 1969 for murder to hunt after former Nazis, and in 1994 they added suspension of the statute of limitations for sexual crimes for anyone under thirty. Re…
/r/MensRights03/10/23 06:31 PM
1

From the perspective of the European social model, to implement the “onus”, or propel the behaviour required for people to still mate, and restore social cohesion damaged by the individualizing ideologies of libel and conspiracy theories that have led countries the last decades and sown distrust, there should actually be monetary incentives. Since unequal treatment of the sexes is accepted by any political side to some degree when it is superficially slanted in favour of women, actually being pr…
/r/MensRights03/10/23 04:34 PM
10

They answer the question of whether they are in a relationship differently. If a woman is visited by Chad once a month to poke then she is “in a relationship”, and the next woman he caters to the same week will think the same. While man would construct the link as live-in. Researchers asking did not define the concept strictly. The visitors of this sub are all retarded for accepting the implication that the discrepancy could be explained by nerdy AI simulations, dolls or bisexuality in women, ev…
/r/MensRights26/09/23 11:12 PM
1

Is it possible that there is an intersection between casualty and seriousness? I mean why can fuckbuddies not be serious? Or am I thinking like a woman too hard? Do you expect them to have logical desires though?
/r/MensRights24/09/23 06:04 PM
-12

There isn’t such a discussion. It is a made-up impression they want you to have. Who is they? The Mormon church. Christian moral degenerates litter the whole internet. Just as some gooners stash archives of porn they cannot watch in life, so proxy repentants do the opposite and write treatises and concert pseudo-intellectual harangues without end. It has no end because it is general enough for steady exorcism, like CO₂ for environment ideologists, and a market demand based in human nature for a …
/r/MensRights19/09/23 11:39 AM
11

The descriptive merit of genderisms about any country is negligible. It’s a very dull idea to assume that the things wrong with Syria and Afghanistan are how they treat women. It’s like boiling down the ideological differences between the policy of the Russian Federation and that of Ukraine to the latter’s positive attitude on LGBT. Countries are trash for both sexes somehow, determined by their material and intellectual wealth and integrity. Naturally, nowhere hate of one gender or the other dr…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 05:15 AM
-3

It does, just not where mainstream discourse believes it to be. It’s all around the internet for sure, but policymakers know little about it and debates revolve around chimerae, with little care about desperate and depressed shut-ins. You should dissect enemy words and their definitions more to beat vain arguments. So where are the talks about mental health, in every corner of society without discrimination? Everyone is doing as though one should follow an universalist ethic, in spite of the yea…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 04:45 AM
3

Now? If you only bothered to look up the penal code provisions it is since 1994, a criminalization of processing DNA “to find out about genetic characteristics” without consent. This fits into the general trend of data protection in Europe and is not specific to family relations. The question of course is who can consent for a child: In France it is the legal parents collectively for everything. The applicability of material criminal law to offences possibly committed abroad, i.e. whether you ca…
/r/MensRights18/09/23 05:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter