~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | What’s a high body count?And that's why I'm happily married and you're on Reddit asking about body count. | /r/seduction | 03/03/26 07:33 PM |
| 3 | What’s a high body count?Nice strawman. But that isn't what I claimed. Why are you pretending that is what I said in order to deflect the question? | /r/seduction | 03/03/26 07:15 PM |
| 3 | What’s a high body count?It's sad that your response to being asked questions about your believes is to resort to personal attacks. But it's an indicator as to why I'm happily married and you're on Reddit asking about body count. | /r/seduction | 03/03/26 07:03 PM |
| 1 | What’s a high body count?Question: If a person gets pet and the pet does, do they care less about the next pet? Are owners on their 6th dog less emotional invested in their animal than those who have their first one? What about hamsters that only live a few years? Where are you getting the idea from that having felt love once makes a person less able to love again? And can you give any other example of the same phenomenon where love is a finite resources? Does a person with a lot of kids love the youngest less than the … | /r/seduction | 03/03/26 06:37 PM |
| 3 | is it just me or is malevolence way more rewarding for a guyI mean, nothing you are saying here indicates that you've ever actually been benevolent to women. You've always approached women as a thing you wanted and the behaved in a manner that made you feel like it ought to get you what you wanted. At first you did so with naivety and now with increasing callousness. But your described attitude was always transactional. That's different from being benevolent. | /r/seduction | 31/01/26 09:35 PM |
| 1 | Cheating by women is ok now. Men can not cheatNot all women. I've argued that paternity tests should be standard by default unless both parents opt out. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/25 04:48 PM |
| 1 | Cheating by women is ok now. Men can not cheatIt's not a limited cohort though. It's random sample over 6 million people. Other western European studies give similar data for various other population sizes. At the most you could argue that North American women are notable different than Western European women so you can't apply to data here. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/25 04:43 PM |
| 1 | Cheating by women is ok now. Men can not cheatYes precisely. It's why the limited cohort of "men doing paternity tests" doesn't give you any usable data for the overall population. It's a self-selected limited cohort. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/25 04:38 PM |
| 1 | Cheating by women is ok now. Men can not cheatIt doesn't just mention historical rates. It mentions that several Western European studies found the same rates in modern day offspring. Historical rates remain consistent with current day cohorts when tested. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/25 04:14 PM |
| 1 | Cheating by women is ok now. Men can not cheatNope. Try reading it maybe? It's a study done comparing historical paternity fraud rates for the past 400 years with modern day rates which found that the number has remained consistent during that period at around 1-3%. Hardly anywhere close to 50%. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/25 04:01 PM |
| 2 | Cheating by women is ok now. Men can not cheathttps://www.kqed.org/science/11450/new-dna-studies-debunk-misconceptions-about-paternal-relationships Random population studies indicate it's 1-3%. If it was anywhere close to 50% half of the families who do DNA kits such as 23andme would find out dad isn't the father. Nothing close to that happens with those services. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/25 12:58 AM |
| 1 | Why isn't dating a winner-takes-all game?All that just to prove your own title wrong and demonstrate that dating is a winner takes all game. It’s just that “being a winner” isn’t “being the most physically attractive” like you apparently assumed but rather “being the most attractive by demonstrating social skills, empathy, ability to communicate, and personal connection”. | /r/seduction | 09/07/25 04:43 PM |
| 1 | How to bypass the "i need time to get intimate" BS?What this is is her being super into you physically but having learned from past experiences that those feelings lead her astray and into bad relationships if she acts on them too quickly. So she takes it slow and doesn’t immediately act on that sexual energy while getting to know you and letting that passion cool down some, to then, with a clear head, decide whether she wants to be into you and take that step. By the time that happened and she got to know you better, she decided that a relation… | /r/seduction | 27/06/25 02:56 PM |
| 8 | “I don’t sleep with guys on the first date” *proceeds to sleep with me on the first date*This. Even if I'm already planning on sleeping with him I'll tell him I won't just to see if he'll respect that and still wants the date. If I get any pressure we really actually won't be sleeping together. If he's chill, we might. | /r/seduction | 30/05/25 03:44 AM |
| 11 | I approached a milf at the libraryNah getting hit on didn't make her feel young. Classy women that age don't have a need to feel younger. Being pretty while you're a young woman is easy. It feels far more powerful to feel attractive despite acknowledging being older. Like you held onto power others lost. That daughter comment made her day. It says she's so pretty he'd settle for someone who vaguely looks like her, but only because he can't have her. | /r/seduction | 30/04/25 03:36 AM |
| 43 | How do I seduce women in their 50s and above when I'm in my 20s?Average women get hit on all the time. Attractive women get hit on even more. An above average attractive woman past her 30s will have been hit on literally HUNDREDS of times in her lifetime, if not thousands. You aren’t going to shock her if you keep it classy and take rejection with grace. I’m in my 40s and I sometimes have younger guys flirting with me more subtly and often I don’t catch on that it’s flirting because I don’t assume a guy in his 20s would be interested in me. So it doesn’t reg… | /r/seduction | 14/04/25 09:25 PM |
| 62 | How do I seduce women in their 50s and above when I'm in my 20s?Attractive women that age have heard all the games a million times. Be direct but classy with them. “Excuse me but I think you’re absolutely stunning. Would you allow me to buy you a drink/take you out/get coffee with you?” Also, don’t tell them you’re into older women. Not because that’s an issue but because women don’t like it when you are into them because they’re a “type” you like. A skinny/fit/young/bbw will likewise not like it if your reason for being into her is that she’s a “type”. Just… | /r/seduction | 14/04/25 09:00 PM |
| 1 | Women have become the bane of my existenceDepends on when it would have been. I just bought a house with my partner so atm, I’d shoot any man down. For most of my single life I wasn’t interested in casual, so I’d have shot down any man not wanting a relationship. When I was interested in casual, I found that there isn’t much benefit in it for us. It tends to come with all of the downsides of a relationship and none of the upsides. Whereas for men it’s the reverse. For me to consider it as a viable option a man would have to convince me … | /r/seduction | 27/03/25 12:36 PM |
| 1 | Women have become the bane of my existenceI don’t mind men being attracted to me. In fact, I consider it a given that a man who is interested in me ought to/will be attracted to me. The issue here comes from the OP giving the impression that this girl being hot is the single most important thing about her. From the way her describes her, her looks are her defining characteristic to him. And I’d like to feel that any man perusing me would do so because he finds things about me personally the most important good fit for him. Whereas the b… | /r/seduction | 27/03/25 12:22 PM |
| 1 | Women have become the bane of my existencePerhaps. Or perhaps that’s the way some men describe women. Regardless, the thing I’m explaining to the OP Is that women generally aren’t interested in dudes who make her feel as if that is how he’d describe her. | /r/seduction | 27/03/25 11:49 AM |
| 1 | Women have become the bane of my existenceI didn’t say her being engaging is a bad reason to be interested. I said that, if the only thing you have to say about her is that you thought she was hot, after spending several days with her, then for many women that attitude… that focus on her being hot as her most singularly notable quality… to the point of it being the only thing you bring up to describe her… would be a massive turn off for most women. You spent several days with this girl, and what stands out to you about her is that she’s… | /r/seduction | 27/03/25 04:06 AM |
| 2 | Women have become the bane of my existenceYeah, as noted I’m considered fairly attractive. But not outrageously so. So what you are saying jives with my experience in that I get cold approached more often than some friends I have who are more in the “outrageously attractive” category. | /r/seduction | 27/03/25 03:55 AM |
| 4 | Women have become the bane of my existenceAs a woman reading along, for what it’s worth, here are my two cents… I’d have turned down any man who gave me the vibe of describing me this way: Recently I just met this smoking hot redhead with skin like milk from High school at my boy’s bachelor party and I she would give me all these enticing smiles and was very talkative with me. If you’re describing me like this to other dudes, after getting to know me during a several days long vacation/trip, your reason for approaching me is just very v… | /r/seduction | 26/03/25 11:49 PM |
| 26 | I Confessed to a Woman on a Date That I Practice Approaching - Her Reaction Was PricelessAnd most lonely women have a string of abusive experiences with men because often assholes are the only ones who are bold and approach because they don't care about rejection while good men are shy and reserved so women have no experience being approaches by them. So those lonely women start to doubt their own ability to select men and also stay lonely and single. The solution to both genders issue precisely is for good men to feel emboldened to make polite approaches as something they do withou… | /r/seduction | 04/03/25 06:38 AM |
| 2 | Chemistry doesn’t exist without physical escalation.I didn't speak for all women. I said that's how it works for me and that, based on the available information about her, she's likely the same. Women who don't feel chemistry with men they don't know don't fuck on the first date. But the lack of sexual tension on a first date is no indication they're not interested nor that they won't develop that chemistry after a few dates. You're the one who made the claim for all women that you can make them cum on a first date if they are into you. That's si… | /r/seduction | 12/09/24 02:24 AM |
| 6 | Chemistry doesn’t exist without physical escalation.You have trouble listening to what women say, don't you? That's probably why you are complaining about her being inconsistent. I didn't say you can't make women cum on the first date. I said you can't make me/her cum on the first date. Because I don't ever have chemistry with men I don't already know. And I know from experience that if I try to sleep with men before I have chemistry with them, they can't make me cum. I suspect she is the same. So she's not ever going to feel chemistry on a first… | /r/seduction | 11/09/24 04:39 AM |
| 7 | Chemistry doesn’t exist without physical escalation.A dude can't make me/her cum after one date, so he doesn't get mountain moving after a single date. After I'm into him, sure. I moved mountains to see and move in with my boyfriend, after we started sleeping together. Took us a while to get to that point though. There were 2 weeks between our first and second conversation. Several days until our third. 6 weeks before our first date. And I didn't see him more than once a month for a while. Once we got to the point of sleeping together we moved in… | /r/seduction | 11/09/24 01:29 AM |
| 4 | Chemistry doesn’t exist without physical escalation.I said nothing about your preferences being incorrect. I said that an expectation of what you want in someone you’re dating isn’t the same thing as a boundary. Wanting a potential to be available to date within a certain timeframe is and expectation, not a boundary. You are the one who brought up men have needs. I pointed out that there aren’t any needs that you should count on a person you’ve been on one date with resolving for you. Nowhere did I say that your expectations are wrong. I said tha… | /r/seduction | 11/09/24 12:43 AM |
| 0 | Chemistry doesn’t exist without physical escalation.When I was single, my social calendar was often full a few weeks ahead of time and I couldn’t just randomly make ‘a few hours’ of time if I already had an event planned with friends that weekend. I traveled to events a lot, and often those tickets/rooms were booked way ahead of time. It wasn’t unusual for me to go a week or more between dates when I was initially getting to know someone. You wanting dates to go faster than that isn’t a boundary, it’s an exception. And there aren’t any needs of y… | /r/seduction | 11/09/24 12:06 AM |
| -4 | Chemistry doesn’t exist without physical escalation.She’s a professor with a busy career and probably a filled up social calendar. And you’re throwing a hissy fit because she didn’t immediately set a second date in stone? Again, why are you concluding that she isn’t being direct, rather than that she’s interested but busy? And now you’re lying about her in your OP, because you said she ghosted you and now you’re saying she replied and she wants to see you again in the future. Sounds like your temper tantrum made her dodge a bullet. | /r/seduction | 10/09/24 11:49 PM |
| 7 | Chemistry doesn’t exist without physical escalation.She decided, based on the conversation, that she wasn’t interested and thus wasn’t receptive to your physical escalation attempts. I’m not clear why that makes you assume she’s not direct with her intentions. Did she tell you she was interested? That she wanted to see you again? That the date went well? If she didn’t say any of those things she was pretty direct about her intention to not see you again. | /r/seduction | 10/09/24 10:56 PM |
| 1 | Do you think women need emotional conflict?But also, I think there's another form of this where it's not necessarily always about validation, but about having their emotional needs taken care of, for example the need to vent their anger or frustration, or sadness. Actually it's more than often a sign not that they need to vent emotionally but physically. Women tend to respond this way when they have pent up sexual energy. It's usually a sign she needs you to fuck her brain out until she is fully done climaxing a few times. They aren't aw… | /r/seduction | 15/06/24 09:25 AM |
| 0 | PSA: There is no such thing as a “lack of chemistry” or “no spark”, only a lack of comfort and rapportwe are most definitively, not saying the same thing that a bunch of people pointed out that are confusing the issue by insisting on using comfortable. and I’m telling you that a woman who thinks of you as a man she’s comfortable with will not desire to sleep with you. | /r/seduction | 20/03/24 06:01 PM |
| 0 | PSA: There is no such thing as a “lack of chemistry” or “no spark”, only a lack of comfort and rapportif I’m sexually attracted to a man, it’s because there is some degree of feeling discomfort about him. It’s precisely the discomfort that makes him attractive. That makes him exciting. if I’m sexually attracted to a man and we move in together, and I become completely comfortable with him, then the sex will die down and we will end up living as roommates until we break up. you are not aiming to make a woman comfortable with you. you are aiming to make her feel safe with you despite feeling uncom… | /r/seduction | 20/03/24 05:56 PM |
| 2 | PSA: There is no such thing as a “lack of chemistry” or “no spark”, only a lack of comfort and rapportNo, I would be very comfortable fucking any of my male friends. I just have no desire to do so, because I’m not sexually attracted to them. for men, sexual opportunities are more scares. so I can see why you’re imagining that if a woman isn’t having sex with you it’s because she wouldn’t feel comfortable enough to do so. Because if you’re unwilling to have sex with somebody, that’s likely a comfort issue. but the same thing doesn’t apply to women. Almost every guy we are willing to have sex with… | /r/seduction | 20/03/24 05:43 PM |
| 3 | PSA: There is no such thing as a “lack of chemistry” or “no spark”, only a lack of comfort and rapportFriendzone = lack of comfort. If she was comfortable with you, she wouldn't be friendzoning you. Comfort includes the "spark". As a woman, hell no. The guys in my friendzone are men I'm comfortable with, but not attracted to. I'm not friends with guys I'm not comfortable with. And I am frequently sexually attracted to men I'm utterly uncomfortable with. In fact, it takes a certain level of discomfort in order to be sexually attracted to a man... if I'm entirely comfortable with him, he's a frien… | /r/seduction | 20/03/24 01:05 PM |
| 2 | Your girl does not want you to be vulnerableVulnerabilities ≠ insecurities. In fact, thinking they're the same thing is a mark of insecurity. | /r/seduction | 12/02/24 06:44 PM |
| 1 | Your girl does not want you to be vulnerableWomen don't like insecurity in men. And neither do men in women. People don't like other people's insecurities because it makes them volatile and unpredictable. | /r/seduction | 12/02/24 01:21 PM |
| 1 | When other guys (try) to steal the showwhere I become a listener en just let him taking it over. You are somehow giving off vibes that indicate that you would let him do that if he barges in, which invites that sort of behavior. Train yourself to reject such takeovers and to not become the passive listener, and it will stop happening. | /r/seduction | 05/02/24 03:36 PM |
| 2 | No instagramI have literally never ever asked a guy for his ig or checked it out. If he's taking pics/posting selfies all the time when we're together, that's a huge turn off. This is total bullshit. It's not 'absolutely required' at all. Might help with some women, might hurt you with others. | /r/seduction | 01/02/24 02:52 PM |
| 1 | Did my first true cold approach and oofFair enough. | /r/seduction | 31/01/24 01:19 AM |
| -3 | Did my first true cold approach and oofDon’t believe in the whole waiting to text deal so I texted a few hours after. You don't believe in the whole waiting to text deal... so you waited a few hours to text? If you asked for my number, and I actually gave it to you, and you waited hours to actually text, I'd ignore you. Not into playing games. | /r/seduction | 31/01/24 01:10 AM |
| 1 | This is what I don't get about the "wait to text" line of thinkingYup. | /r/seduction | 30/01/24 06:01 PM |
| 1 | This is what I don't get about the "wait to text" line of thinkingPeople keep saying it's essential to play games and wait 2, 3, 4, 5 days before texting a woman to demonstrate your "abundance", to hint at how busy and important you are, to make her wonder about you, to artificially increase your mystery, whatever. I'm 39F. In regards to playing texting games to demonstrate your "abundance" to show my age and quote Shania Twain: "That don't impresses me much". I recently signed up for a dating app (Ok Cupid). In the first month I got 4900 likes/matches and ~50… | /r/seduction | 30/01/24 05:56 PM |
| 4 | Problems dealing with and understanding womenWomen will meet me (in person or online), give me their number after a good initial meeting/conversation, and then literally waste my energy/time texting for days/weeks, usually with no real intention of meeting or moving anything forward. What constitutes 'not wasting your time'? Do you want to immediately meet every day if you hit off? Several times a week? Want sex right away? How soon? First date? First week? First month? Do you want sex every time you see her? Let's say you meet a woman you… | /r/seduction | 27/01/24 06:32 PM |
| 14 | How do you differentiate between real and feigned interest?Don't buy stuff for people you're not already dating. You don't owe her compensation for her time to figure out if she wants to date you or not. Once you are dating, you still don't owe her compensation for her time, but it becomes a nice gesture to show her you value her. She should be making nice gestures like that towards you too, either by paying for your drinks too, or in other ways if there's a large income difference between you. The only reason you would pay for a drink on a first meet i… | /r/seduction | 27/01/24 06:01 PM |
| 0 | Masculicide and Androcide: why Femicide is two things at the same timeEven ignoring male victims of emergencies like in Titanic with "women and children first" is a gendercide That was implemented because prior to Titanic there were several high-profile shipwrecks where not a single woman or child survived. Titanic was only the second ship it was implemented on, and the one that popularized the notion more broadly to the public. In the years since then men still survive shipwrecks at double the rate women do. While children only have a 15% survival rate. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/01/24 01:06 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter