TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MeLittleSKS Archive

View 0 posts and 125 comments by MeLittleSKS on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-5

global population sure. but globally it's bad for women too...
/r/MensRights25/06/21 06:25 PM
20

MOST men don't die alone in poverty. not even close to 95%
/r/MensRights25/06/21 01:14 PM
2

it has SOME truth, but it's not entirely true. ALL love is conditional. women aren't loved unconditionally either. Women are still expected to "provide" certain things - just not usually money. they're expected to provide children, love, sex, emotional support, etc.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 01:14 PM
7

especially egregious when you consider the difference in expected lifespan.
/r/MensRights21/06/21 07:09 PM
2

ever watch a discussion where a leftist/progressive/marxist mentions how black people are over-represented in prison and it's because of systemic racism, but then if you point out that the vast majority of inmates are men, they start sputtering about how men are inherently more prone to committing crimes?
/r/MensRights18/06/21 07:54 PM
2

you make some fair points. and obviously, listing out Phil's achievements and abilities do portray a different picture. the problem is the portrayal though. DESPITE being this uber-successful guy who must be intelligent and driven and competent, he's still portrayed as a bumbling idiot who can't function as an adult inside the home. in a way, he's just a realistic Homer Simpson - Homer's most prominent job (obviously he's had a bunch in the show) is a nuclear power plant worker of some kind. An …
/r/MensRights18/06/21 12:08 PM
1

idk about that. Phil is a bumbling moron. He's portrayed as not only less successful than his wife, but she's also the primary caregiver and better parent. Phil is more like a 4th child than a parent.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 06:32 PM
28

that's what that policy would imply.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 01:28 PM
2

that's true for most people, I suspect. most men get these "toxic masculinity" ideas imposed on them by other women.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 01:15 PM
4

not to mention all the stigma (from women) around men sharing their feelings. Men who get too emotional are scorned and rejected by women.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 01:10 PM
4

this x1000. It drives me nuts. any issue that affects men, society seems to just blame men for it. They somehow find a way to victim-blame in every case.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 01:09 PM
31

Many feminists try to whitewash history by saying "women and children first" was just a phrase in popular culture these are the same people that get butthurt over terms like "fireman" or "mankind" and claim that it's evidence of systemic patriarchal sexism. lol.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 01:05 PM
24

men only deserve shelter in an emergency if they are with a woman. lol.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 01:04 PM
4

I didn't say it was easy. be careful.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 07:54 PM
3

don't date the sort of woman who would do that.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 07:49 PM
3

yeah that's not really an ally I need lol. it's nice that she's talking about male victims of abuse. But she's got some clear issues herself with contributing to the problem.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 03:29 PM
3

for 19: sometimes you do just get blessed and win the lottery that that same girl just happens to be a good person and makes your life infinitely better, even changing it's trajectory. unfortunately that isn't the norm.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 03:24 PM
1

no see men don't do ballet because of male patriarchal sexism. /s
/r/MensRights04/05/21 03:20 PM
7

their definition of non-toxic masculinity is really femininity. if men don't get to impose standards on what a woman should be, then women don't get to do it to men. that would be fair, following their logic. except, that's stupid because biology and human existence means that we do set standards for each other.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 03:19 PM
7

exactly. there have been multiple headlines of that sort about covid's affect on the populace. it's like that old cliche about men dying in war affecting women the most.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 03:16 PM
28

typical. say last year 100 men lose their jobs and 20 women lose their jobs, and then this year 120 men lose their jobs and 40 women lose their jobs, and the headline will focus on the women. every time.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 11:39 AM
0

nobody says you need to find a replacement mom. but it's just a statistical reality that single parent children are statistically much worse off than two-parent households.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 06:25 PM
1

yeah that might be an accidental selection mechanism created by the biased family courts.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 06:24 PM
-2

honestly, it varies. if it's a 10 year old, I don't think anyone reacts that way. if it's a 17 year old boy.....sorry, but we remember being 17 year old boys. that's why. see, the double standard exists, but the problem isn't with a 16-17 year old buy having consensual sex with a 25 year old teacher. the problem is that a 25 year old male teacher having consensual sex with a 17 year old girl is labeled "horrific, evil, pedophile, omg male power position raping poor vulnerable children". I rememb…
/r/MensRights29/04/21 06:18 PM
5

because that's what tyrannical propaganda news outlets do. They don't just do journalism, they report based on "public interest". so if some big-wig decides that some story is "harmful", it gets memory-holed.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 03:40 PM
1

BINGO. it's what I hate about "representation" stats. they don't factor in how many people are actually interested in an activity, they only look at the overall total population.
/r/MensRights07/01/21 08:35 PM
2

or the college girls going to school on daddy's money walking by the construction site full of highschool dropouts doing manual labor and thinking that "oh those white males are the oppressors and I'm the victim".
/r/MensRights30/12/20 07:27 PM
1

it's the key thing feminists miss. yes, most women were oppressed throughout history. they couldn't own property, couldn't vote, etc. but what they miss, is that neither could most men. Sure, a TINY minority of uber-powerful men in the ruling class could do those things. But the vast majority of men were in the same boat as the women.
/r/MensRights30/12/20 02:52 PM
1

I mean, I have my wife for that - thankfully she's not a crazy person, or some toxic feminist. I'm fine opening up to her, she knows everything about me. just sad for men still single or dating - basically being told that if they don't open up emotionally they're toxic and dangerous, but that if they open up emotionally to women, they're being needy and demanding a woman rehabilitate them.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 06:28 PM
10

lol mine either. just being sardonic. Like, thanks ladies, guess we'll just figure it out ourselves.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 06:27 PM
32

"men need to open up more, but don't turn to your female intimate partner for emotional support" I guess we'll just be gay then.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 05:18 PM
5

it's that last part that gets me
/r/MensRights08/12/20 12:54 PM
1

hmm that's a good one.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 07:14 PM
1

I've always preferred replying to any accusation of mansplaining with a swift double-down and reverse - "I'll stop mansplaining when you start woman-understanding". usually drops their jaw lol
/r/MensRights07/12/20 12:53 PM
5

because their gender studies professor gave it to them like it's a magic wand that they can use to silence men. and it works on any of the men in their gender studies class, so then they take it out into the real world. A man says something they disagree with? he's mansplaining.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 12:52 PM
6

that's all standard belief on the left right now. a man explaining something = mansplaining and is sexist. and racism is only possible from white people directed at non-white people. a black person can spew the most vile vitriol directed at white people, but it's not racism because slavery happened.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 12:50 PM
3

He's literally know as the grim reaper of bills because he refuses to work with Democrats on anything. two sides to that coin. the Democrats under Nancy "you have to pass the bill to know what's in it" Pelosi are notorious for drafting garbage bills and omnibus packages that blend in tons of garbage with one key piece of legislation, and ensuring that there's parts in the bill that the GOP can't accept, only to then trot around that sort of "party of no" rhetoric. He literally the only one of th…
/r/MensRights02/12/20 09:27 PM
1

what an absurd take. to say that McConnell is somehow more hostile than Pelosi? how so?
/r/MensRights02/12/20 06:56 PM
4

I just say that I'll stop "mansplaining" when they start "woman-understanding". that usually leaves them pretty speechless.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 06:51 PM
3

This is a text book example of Ad hominem, Attacking the character behind the argument. Stop for a second and pretend she just said, that he was being condescending and rude, then apply his response. it's her that made the ad hominem attack then, by calling him "rude".
/r/MensRights02/12/20 06:50 PM
1

"luring for sex" you mean......raped?
/r/MensRights02/12/20 01:25 PM
2

their flawed illogical response would be that those behaviors in women are a result of what patriarchal society has taught them is important, and that feminism is about demolishing toxic masculinity, that it's actually toxic masculinity to blame for women behaving that way because women think they need to behave that way.
/r/MensRights25/11/20 01:23 PM
1

except you and I both know that neither society nor the legal system will act that way.
/r/MensRights24/11/20 02:05 PM
1

No, Asians aren’t known to be active meme ers of white supremacy groups. Andy Ngo is. he's not though. also, ignoring the actual point, actual sources, and actual evident, and nit-picking an irrelevant line in the article, is not a rebuttal. but nice try. like I said, if you get to hand-wave away my sources, I can do the same for your drivel.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 03:04 PM
2

because you and I both know that, even though there's ZERO men's shelters for abuse victims, if a man murdered his wife because she was abusive and he couldn't escape, society would lock him in a cage for 30 years, declare him to be an evil woman-hating wife-murdering scumbag, and write him off.
/r/MensRights19/11/20 01:07 PM
6

so if a woman habitually abuses a man and he feels like he can't escape, it's justified for him to murder her? do what you gotta do right?
/r/MensRights18/11/20 09:17 PM
10

it's all gross. I mean, needless to say, nobody would tolerate men saying "yeah my wife slapped our daughter, so I murdered her" or "she was mean and nasty and hit me that one time, so I killed her". much less call it "wholesome".
/r/MensRights18/11/20 09:16 PM
1

You tried to delegitimize my sources, but linked to an article of nonsense propaganda and before you make some comment about my sources being biased, consider - you posted links from Daily Beast, HuffPo, etc. lol. and yes, the famous asian white supremacist. lol. asians are indeed well-known for being white supremacists eyeroll and it being an "opinion piece" doesn't change the fact of the events it's listing. See, contrary to what you'd hope, simple ad hominem isn't enough to dismiss things - o…
/r/MensRights18/11/20 06:59 PM
1

You are assigning Obama’s decisions to him, and nothing in your previous comments refuted that. so you absolve Biden of ANY responsibility for anything that happened as VP under Obama? including the good stuff too right? https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.huffpost.com/us/entry/100586/amp straight from that article: So the goal of the ‘operation’ for Limbaugh is not to encourage his listeners to commit acts of violence they admit that Limbaugh wasn't calling for violence. he may have been encouraging…
/r/MensRights18/11/20 04:25 PM
2

definitely the bad-ass girl power Mary Sue hero. everyone likes her. she's more powerful than established characters. she's got a special snowflake fan-fic-esque self-insert backstory, she's tough and cool and knowledgeable and wise and smart and powerful and good and always right.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 01:53 PM
1

they're just copying that """study""" from France that said the same thing
/r/MensRights17/11/20 08:06 PM
2

no see the men there are all evil and violent.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 08:01 PM
3

yeah they sorta missed that one lol
/r/MensRights17/11/20 08:00 PM
5

it's just so typical to try and whitewash that evil women. like it's somehow better or understandable that she raped a 15 year old just because she was abused in the past.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 07:59 PM
2

92% of inmates are men “Too often, discriminatory laws and excessive police powers form a toxic combination that results in more and more women being separated from their families and funnelled into the prison system.” lol also fun part is when they say that the women getting stuck in prison more/longer are "impoverished" and victims, but the men are "violent".
/r/MensRights17/11/20 07:58 PM
1

not white or anglophone.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 07:56 PM
1

lol confirmed for the fact that being a woman is a disability hahahahaha oh wow. that's really awkward.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 07:55 PM
1

leave. expecting justice and fair treatment from EMTs and cops is a bit too much. just leave. move out. don't contact her ever again. take all your stuff, leave all her stuff, record everything. or if it's your place, kick her out immediately, same applies. if she tries to be violent, try to record it. film it, or even audio. use a cloud-based recording service so that neither she nor the cops can delete or 'lose' the evidence. be careful she doesn't drop a rape accusation on you. she sounds cra…
/r/MensRights17/11/20 07:54 PM
1

battered husband syndrome? doubt that would fly as a defense lol
/r/MensRights17/11/20 07:51 PM
1

Biden didn’t preside over any bombings or genocides. Those were Obama’s Biden was VP. You’re both robbing Biden of credit for things he has directly responsible for (overseeing our economic recovery and the violence against women act) while simultaneously pushing the blame onto him for things that weren’t his decisions. like I said. you pick. either he's responsible for the good and bad things that happened under him as VP, or he's responsible for neither. Up to you. If you want to credit him wi…
/r/MensRights16/11/20 08:20 PM
1

So Obama’s decisions are now Biden’s to take the credit/blame for, but Biden also gets zero credit for the committees/programs/bills that he actually oversaw as senator and VP? You are more than grasping at straws here. hey, you choose man. if you wanna give Biden credit for some bill that got passed 10 years ago, he's also gotta take the blame for drone-bombing brown kids in the middle east. If you want to know the damage that Rush Limbaugh has caused, just look at the rise in right wing propag…
/r/MensRights16/11/20 03:51 PM
1

Not equivalent. Not even close. I think being responsible for genocide is pretty close lol. Biden has also done a lot of good, like manage the economic recovery act that kept millions out of poverty and rescued our economy giving Biden credit for "muh economy" is a bit weak. Especially while he was overseeing a government that drone-bombed the living daylights out of tons of countries and started various wars in the middle east. Please name any amount of good that Rush did that helped millions o…
/r/MensRights16/11/20 01:58 PM
1

imagine thinking that having a degree in journalism means someone is objective lol. and yeah, FOX is at least open about many of their hosts being biased opinion commentators. Fools like Chris Cuomo, Anderson Cooper, Brooke Baldwin, Don Lemon, Wolf Blitzer, etc. put themselves forward as being just unbiased objective journalists who just report the facts of the story. Meanwhile they're just as biased as any FOX news anchor. Not a journalist or actual professional or scientist to be found. so you…
/r/MensRights16/11/20 01:46 PM
1

Wrong, as your kind always is lol I can just smell the derision. "my kind" huh? how ominous. I had to slowly watch him radicalize my mother with hateful right-wing white supremacist propaganda. quote me Rush Limbaugh being a white supremacist. I'll wait. It's funny how all of you right wing propaganda puppets sound exactly the same. right back atcha sunshine. muh rush limbaugh, muh FOX news, muh Rupert Murdoch, muh Koch Brothers. But keep enjoying your oh-so objective journalisming performed by …
/r/MensRights13/11/20 08:45 PM
0

You obviously don't know anything about Rush Limbaugh, just another uneducated troglodyte who thinks his opinion is worth something. I guarantee you've never listened to Rush Limbaughs show in your entire life and formulated this opinion based on what Salon, Vox, CNN, or NYT told you to think about him. Rush just spent 50 years tearing down social progress, fomenting violence against minorities and destroying democracy. sounds like a pretty powerful guy. wow. I quite literally jumped for Joy whe…
/r/MensRights13/11/20 07:40 PM
2

I think Joe Biden is a racist who spews hate and has contributed very little good and a whole lot of evil. he supported the iraq war, supported Obama's drone-strike murders, made racist comments on many occasions, has a weird affinity for sniffing women and groping children, and the world is a worse place because of his actions. therefore, you should be fine if I wish death on Joe Biden and cheer if/when he gets sick and dies a painful death? no sympathy for creepy uncle Joe, right? is that an a…
/r/MensRights13/11/20 07:37 PM
9

Salon and Vox told them Rush was evil and mean, so he must be
/r/MensRights13/11/20 07:34 PM
2

and lemme guess, you think he's a "giant asshole" because.....? Like I said. this is just standard behavior. I mean, it's practically mainstream to wish death upon Donald Trump "because he's totally evil". who would be Limbaughs equivalent on the left? Wolf Blitzer? Anderson Cooper? Cenk Uyger (lol)? I think they're assholes, so is it cool if I wish death on them and mock them if/when they die? I mean if that's the game we're playing, fair enough I guess.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 04:21 PM
3

k so Biden has mocked Trump, does that mean it's cool if we mock Biden when he dies or is dying? Clinton has mocked lots of people, let's cheer when she kicks the bucket too, ok? this trend of declaring someone to be persona non grata and thereby justifying anything you do to them is disgusting.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 04:08 PM
9

I think you'll find it has more to do with politics. ie. Rush Limbaugh is a Republican, therefore he's evil, therefore his death is to be celebrated. pretty much everyone on the left was cheering when they heard he had cancer. Just like they cheered when Trump got Covid, or when Scalia died, etc.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 04:07 PM
21

because the left manipulates and destroys words and definitions. "mens rights" really means hating women and being sexist. just like "racism" really means "white people being mean" and "rape" can't mean "women sexually assaulting men".
/r/MensRights13/11/20 02:43 PM
1

I know. that's a whole other problem
/r/MensRights04/11/20 01:00 PM
0

I don't particularly care either way, I'm married, don't have any issues with this, but: 1) it's largely about self-discipline. a month won't harm anyone. and for young men who may be engaging in compulsive/excessive masturbation, it can be a healthy jump-start. I'd say excessive masturbation is a worse issue in our society right now than not enough. 2) part of the motive is that it makes husbands/boyfriends pursue their women for sex more, or motivate single men to go out and get into relations…
/r/MensRights03/11/20 01:22 PM
1

this has nothing to do with climate change or anyone being a "climate denier". you seem confused.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 01:21 PM
3

It's a metaphor. It's not supposed to be 100% scientifically accurate. Every metaphor falls apart if you over analyze it. That's not the point of a metaphor. it's just a bad metaphor though. considering that one of the main ways of fighting large destructive fires is with other fires. lol. don't die on that hill man. The nukes where dropped before MAD was a thing. yeah, that's exactly my point though. It's a foolish assumption that mad wouldn't have worked without the US using nukes in war. it m…
/r/MensRights30/10/20 07:15 PM
4

Fighting fire with fire just causes a bigger flame. that's not even true though. first of all, controlled burns are effective at stopping forest fires, and even preventing them - they burn up all the fuel. burning up all the fuel means the destructive uncontrolled fire stops spreading. MAD works on the basis of a threat of action yeah, and MAD only worked because the world watched the US actually drop two nukes on an enemy nation. So yeah, start throwing around their own logic and talking about …
/r/MensRights30/10/20 06:40 PM
5

thing is, there's large successful movements to support women going through those things, and it's rarely used to attack those women. Someone who called a woman "less of a woman" for getting breast cancer would be publicly lynched. But joking about a man losing his testicles to cancer or getting examined for prostate cancer is pretty common
/r/MensRights30/10/20 02:32 PM
1

feminists would say "that's because being masculine is seen as good, and feminine as weak, because patriarchy". the reality is, as you say - attacks on fundamental gender characteristics are par for the course for all men. Main attacks against men are always targeted that way - attacking your sexual orientation, sexual performance, physical appearance, sexual experience, penis size, etc. The main attack always made against men is attacking their masculinity - their essence as a man. Attacks on w…
/r/MensRights30/10/20 02:31 PM
39

sometimes, the best way to counter a really vapid stupid argument is to actually stoop to that level - mutually assured destruction. make them start arguing how "womansplaining" isn't real, that it doesn't exist, that's sexist, etc. and then just use their own arguments back - that's your female privilege, being privileged means you can't even see your privilege, you can't help but be sexist, the matriarchy has told you that womansplaining is ok and has taught men to accept it from a young age, …
/r/MensRights30/10/20 02:24 PM
6

some people have said for a while now that radical feminism will inadvertently create second-hand sexism. the consequences of a movement like "believe all women" means men will (logically) be more hesitant and careful in their interactions with women.
/r/MensRights30/10/20 02:21 PM
1

can you explain the difference between looking at a photo of a hot woman and objectifying her, vs looking at the same photo and not objectifying her?
/r/MensRights27/10/20 02:40 PM
15

rofl the old trope that a world full of women would be a peaceful utopia, when an office full of women can't even be peaceful.
/r/MensRights27/10/20 12:44 PM
2

I think you're confused and are responding to the wrong person. your comment makes zero sense in the context of mine.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 04:16 PM
2

what do you want a source for? my observation of men who get labeled as incels? that's just my observation.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 02:26 PM
3

radical feminists have ironically become proponents of old-school chivalry. apparently they want a female politician to be treated with kid gloves by her opponents.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 02:08 PM
3

my default answer to anyone who uses the word "mansplaining" around me unironically is to immediately tell them that I will stop "mansplaining" if they start "woman-understanding".
/r/MensRights09/10/20 02:07 PM
4

that's what feminists and misandrists told you an incel was. some get angry and rude, sure. but many are just......sad. they're men who are either unattractive or have some sort of mental illness that makes them undesirable to women, and so they end up starved for affection. And often, they do turn toxic.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 02:01 PM
8

no.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 04:23 PM
1

They're both bad. But they're not equally bad. I don't see the difference. that's your inherent misandrism where physical harm done to women is perceived as worse than physical harm done to men. The 2 main differences are: 1) The MOTIVE for male circumcision is NOT to reduce sexual enjoyment, whereas for women it is. 2) When done correctly, men still enjoy sex when circumcized; women do not. you understand there's different types of female circumcision, right? like there's multiple forms of it w…
/r/MensRights30/09/20 12:01 PM
8

because as good as the response was overall, they can't escape the narrative that women are the true victims, that all women always face the obstacle of systemic sexism. but oh yeah, 'bias' also sometimes affects men. shrug
/r/MensRights29/09/20 08:07 PM
1

circumcision reduces sexual enjoyment, and removes portions of the penis that have enormous numbers of nerve endings. This is undeniable medical fact. You CAN NOT claim that slicing some skin from the penis is ok but slicing some skin from a vagina is bad.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 07:45 PM
2

explain to me how they're different. many of the forms of FGM are directly analogous to male circumcision.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 01:50 PM
72

to pretend that men had sole control over societal norms is dumb and incorrect. were men political leaders? or legislators? sure. a tiny class of men were. but "men" as a whole didn't. And even still, women have ALWAYS had a huge impact on the stereotypes/standards and expectations for men.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 11:51 AM
1

right but remove all the married couples from that and look only at single people. that 4% point disparity will grow.
/r/MensRights25/09/20 04:52 PM
3

Straight men and straight women have the EXACT same amount of sex (that's how sex works), we just tend to assign agency to the male participant. that's not actually true though. a minority of men have sex with the majority of women. a large number of men don't have sex at all.
/r/MensRights25/09/20 02:05 PM
1

I don't understand men who can live that way. my wife and I have a good partnership. we really do decide things as a team. we share all finances, we share all decisions. And it's not like we're not allowed to do things without consulting the other first, it's that we WANT to make the decisions together. I couldn't even say whether or not one of us is the "dominant" one. Almost every major decisions we've ever made was made together. One of us may have suggested it or initiated it first, or one o…
/r/MensRights22/09/20 12:27 PM
1

the 'actual' or dictionary definition as of a couple years ago was simple - "prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular racial or ethnic group" the SJW definition adds a parameter - it's directed at a "marginalized group". So suddenly prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism towards, say, white people, is not "racism" anymore, because white people are not "marginalized", but are the oppressors. so the definition i…
/r/MensRights21/09/20 12:46 PM
11

one asks what this is supposed to teach students. are they just reciting the dictionary? doubtful. clearly they're supposed to reference something else, some sort of SJW textbook or similar. Where the student is supposed to unlearn the dictionary plain definitions, and learn the new SJW definitions of the words.
/r/MensRights18/09/20 09:21 PM
2

all you have to do when someone talks about toxic masculinity is talk about toxic femininity. And then watch them sputter and scream and scramble in protest that there's no such thing
/r/MensRights15/09/20 08:28 PM
8

that's what they believe. have you not seen any of the feminist drivel about how if a man doesn't want to get pegged, it means he's a latent homophobe and how men need to embrace their homosexual sides?
/r/MensRights15/09/20 08:26 PM
1

how does divorce mean he'll get a chance to raise them right? he won't. he won't be allowed to.
/r/MensRights15/09/20 02:20 PM
2

divorce is still brutal on the children. and she will likely get majority custody, or even full custody if she freaks out and fights it hard. That usually ends up with children in court having to decide who they want to live with, children being taken by police officers away from one parent or the other, etc. it's messy. harmful to the kids.
/r/MensRights15/09/20 01:41 PM
1

leaving doesn't do the children any good. Him being a parent in the house if he doesn't fight that ideology, his children will see him as supportive of it. then fight for it. abandoning his kids is just as evil as what his wife is doing.
/r/MensRights15/09/20 01:14 PM
1

he has children. leaving would be irresponsible.
/r/MensRights15/09/20 12:34 PM
1

he shoulda followed the 12:1 rule. after that twelfth shot she gave him, he shoulda started swinging
/r/MensRights15/09/20 12:31 PM
1

yeah never understood that push that everyone "deserves respect". like, no, respect is earned. If someone wants my respect, they're going to have to earn it. But like you say, they are entitled to my civility, which they will have.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 02:52 PM
2

it's literally nonsense. apparently now "cohabitation" doesn't mean living together in a shared residence. It apparently means.......I have no idea.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 07:24 PM
5

you have a fair point. thing is, there has to be some sort of "age of adulthood" where you assign children the same level of self-determination as an adult. Obviously I think we'd all agree that a 5 year old isn't capable of giving informed consent to sex. But obviously an 18 year old is. Where the exact line is, I don't know, but here's the thing - that line should be universal. It doesn't make sense that a 16 year old can't drink a beer, but can drive a 2000lb hunk of metal at 70mph down the h…
/r/MensRights09/09/20 08:32 PM
3

you're readying it wrong. in 1/3 of countries, women are the majority of child traffickers. in 2/3 of countries, men are the majority of child traffickers. if it's an accurate statistic, I'm not sure what you're getting mad about
/r/MensRights09/09/20 01:03 PM
1

we can just be a trans-man. why not? what, are they going to claim I can't be a transman because I'm biologically a man? that's transphobic.
/r/MensRights04/09/20 07:54 PM
1

you don't need surgery to be a trans-woman you transphobic monster!
/r/MensRights04/09/20 07:53 PM
4

or the classic "kill all men" then say "omg it's just a joke, we don't literally mean it"
/r/MensRights04/09/20 07:52 PM
2

TeAcH mEn NoT tO rApE
/r/MensRights04/09/20 07:50 PM
2

exactly. their point is actually kinda right, they just don't know what the proper solution is. someone who only gives to their partner with the expectation of receiving equal payment in return is gross. But their solution of "therefore the man should give me 100 and I give 0" is equally gross.
/r/MensRights04/09/20 07:49 PM
2

sounds like you're already on the right track. hope this all goes well for you.
/r/MensRights04/09/20 07:34 PM
3

naw. it's just extra proof that it was some sexist bias that created that slide. They had to add extra and duplicate entries just to make the acronym fit, because they WANTED it to be "men bad, woman good"
/r/MensRights04/09/20 07:28 PM
13

next time a woman says you're "mansplaining", the only appropriate response is to say "I'll stop mansplaining when you stop woman-understanding". then watch the jaws drop.
/r/MensRights04/09/20 05:55 PM
7

yeah but including that just to force the acronym to spell "women" is pretty obvious. and yes, saying "obey social distancing" and "avoid crowding" are the same thing.
/r/MensRights04/09/20 12:14 PM
2

that's the core of intersectionality. it's the same logic as how you can't be racist towards white people. why? because they determine certain groups have "power" in society. They decide certain groups are "oppressors" and other groups are "oppressed". and once you decide that, things like sexism, abuse, racism, etc. are all dependent on that power imbalance. So a white person hating black people? that's racism. a black person hating white people? well that's just a manifestation of their resist…
/r/MensRights03/09/20 04:15 PM
8

you're saying that they're potatoes? lol
/r/MensRights03/09/20 04:13 PM
17

my......god. they've circled back full 180 degrees now. they're like those "anti racist" activists who are pushing for "blacks only" spaces on college campuses.....
/r/MensRights03/09/20 04:13 PM
361

they really stretched it too with the "exercise and eat well", and the last one is just a duplicate of obeying social distancing. gross.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 02:54 PM
4

so women with a high sex drive can't be raped either because they must want it, right? that's so gross. sorry for what happened to you.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 02:41 PM
2

imagine then literally going to the "well look at what he was wearing" justification. gross.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 02:38 PM
3

men created society? women are the primary caregivers. women are most teachers. women are most counsellors, therapists, psychologists, sociologists, etc. it's women who are raising men. It's women who put expectations on men. Men generally don't care what other men think of them, but they care deeply about what women think of them - it's biological
/r/MensRights02/09/20 01:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter