~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | MSNBC is currently airing a "documentary" that is shaming and making criminals out of oridnary men.I feel a little uncomfortable about you comparing either drug dealing or prostitution to burglary and robbery. Prostitution and drugs don't always have victims, and when they do it is often a result of their illegal status. Burglary and robbery absolutely do always have victims. | /r/MensRights | 24/12/13 03:49 AM |
| 2 | Radical feminists steal $2,000 worth of calendarsProbably not. There are plenty of things wrong with the slut-walkers, but a fanatical anti-sex attitude that would cause them to hate such mild, soft-core erotica is not one of them. Unless they are members of the fat pride brigade, and their issue with the calendars were not that the models were scantily clad but that they weigh less than hippos. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/13 06:21 PM |
| 1 | Of All of Hugo Schwyzer's Horrible Crimes This May Be the Worst...Yes, OK, you have a point. Attempted murder is slightly worse than getting me to agree with Julian Real, but only successful murder is much worse. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/13 03:02 AM |
| 4 | Feminist university newspaper article says there's no such thing as a good man in a patriarchy, and that all men oppress women by nothing more than existing. And more happy thoughts.I don't think anyone has ever suggested that "patriarchy" is a system that only benefits men. I have mostly seen it used to at least imply, if not directly state, that men are overwhelmingly advantaged in society. While that may be true for much of human history and for some places in the world today (e.g. those under Sharia Law) it does not apply to mainstream culture in present day industrially advanced societies. Nor do they wish necessarily for a system that benefits only women. Maybe not co… | /r/MensRights | 26/08/13 07:59 PM |
| 2 | Feminist university newspaper article says there's no such thing as a good man in a patriarchy, and that all men oppress women by nothing more than existing. And more happy thoughts.I would say using definitions that you and a few of your friends agree to is more a case of moving the goalpost than using words in the way the vast majority of people familiar with these terms use them. Then again, maybe you have your own special definition for "moving the goalpost", too. In any case, I don't see the point in using the propaganda terms of your opponents. Whatever they mean to you, the most common use of the terms "patriarchy" and "male privilege" are by people who believe we li… | /r/MensRights | 26/08/13 07:14 PM |
| 3 | Feminist university newspaper article says there's no such thing as a good man in a patriarchy, and that all men oppress women by nothing more than existing. And more happy thoughts.Not saying that you're wrong, but give examples rather than making a blanket statement about "the men subreddits." | /r/MensRights | 26/08/13 06:28 PM |
| 17 | Feminist university newspaper article says there's no such thing as a good man in a patriarchy, and that all men oppress women by nothing more than existing. And more happy thoughts.Male privilege exists, so does a patriarchy. What the fembots refuse to acknowledge is that this system cuts both ways You just contradicted yourself. A system that benefits men at the expense of women sometimes but benefits women at the expense of men other times is not one where men are universally privileged over women. Thus, patriarchy and male privilege do not exist in the sense that feminists and other social justice warriors use these terms. You may be using them to describe the gender sy… | /r/MensRights | 26/08/13 06:25 PM |
| 1 | Woman at Pycon takes a picture of two guys after being horribly offended at them making a Dongle joke, and a pun about "forking" code in private conversation. Tweets their picture, they are removed frhttps://www.change.org/petitions/sendgrid-please-fire-adria-richards | /r/MensRights | 21/03/13 03:09 PM |
| 6 | Radfem Piece of Shit Decides That Glaring Injustices That Don't Affect Him (Her? It?) Are "Irrelevant"Check out this witty banter from the thing that shit out the original article: http://i.imgur.com/ZKpn6VR.jpg I thought about responding to it but figured it speaks for itself. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/13 09:05 PM |
| 1 | Don't be THAT girl - 2I don't care what you have between your legs, I'm disgusted enough by what's between your ears. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/12 08:30 PM |
| 1 | Don't be THAT girl - 2Wow! You used bold! I guess that must make it true! | /r/MensRights | 30/12/12 08:26 PM |
| 1 | Don't be THAT girl - 2I don't think that most MRAs think that most women need to be taught not to lie about rape. I think the idea is to show rape culture believing feminists how absurd their message is. Also, this helps remind fair-minded people that not everything that rape culture warriors call rape is rape. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/12 06:18 PM |
| 3 | Having just discovered SRS/SRSWomen, this is how I imagined the posters.We are allowed to have some light-hearted fun at the SRShitter's expense. Almost all the posts on the make on their own subs, and the comments they make when trolling and downvote brigading others, are 100 times more mean-spirited than this. | /r/MensRights | 21/12/12 07:28 PM |
| 0 | Having just discovered SRS/SRSWomen, this is how I imagined the posters.I think some look similar the woman in the OP's picture but with that woman's weight. | /r/MensRights | 21/12/12 07:21 PM |
| 3 | I hate that this is our reality (x-post from r/imgoingtohellforthis)None of us know what really happened but what she wrote, and what she left out of her writing, is filled with tell-tale signs this was not rape. First, she says her rapist doesn't know he raped her. Every man who came of age in the last 30 years has heard endless lectures of how "no means no." If she had said no (without saying yes later), or shown any signs of not wanting it, such as pulling away, pushing him away, or simply being passive and not participating, he would at least know he had don… | /r/MensRights | 07/12/12 08:57 PM |
| -1 | Why I believe doxxing is not *always* a bad thing X-posted to antisrs, SRSsucksI am saying that I don't think the right to anonymity is absolute and trying to draw a line. It is like the difference between the right to own a gun and a nuclear bomb. If you don't think I've drawn the line in the right place tell me where you would, or do you think anonymity should be protected at all costs, even if, say, people were discussing a plot to kill someone? | /r/MensRights | 06/12/12 05:26 PM |
| 1 | Story of a boy being raped by a woman on the front page of reddit today. Why are we not talking about this?We aren't up in arms because we realize the rape laws are messed up to begin with. Or at least we should. As I wrote here I share [your] disgust at the double standard but we should be fighting against the notion that the situation would be rape with sexes reversed not for the notion that this should be considered rape. And I will ask anyone here who would label, this rape the question I asked SRS rhetorically in an AntiSRS post: What part of "the age of consent in some states" do you not unders… | /r/MensRights | 26/10/12 04:36 PM |
| 3 | Traditional Nazi or FeminaziDone: White Supremacist or Radical Feminist? With an additional disclaimer of how I don't believe all feminists are like this. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/12 10:47 AM |
| 3 | Traditional Nazi or FeminaziIt's still an ugly term. Ugly but accurate. Saying that extreme feminists are "like" Nazis is wishy-washy language, something that feminists are often guilty of. OK. How is this? Extreme feminists are exactly the same as Nazis, except for their choice of targets (and, to some extent, the demographics that compose them). Maybe not 100% accurate, but close enough. Also, MRAs shouldn't combat the extreme fringes of the feminist movement unless they are actually exercising power. They don't have tot… | /r/MensRights | 14/10/12 10:30 AM |
| 0 | Traditional Nazi or FeminaziYou have some valid points, but this shows how the more extreme feminists really are like Nazis. It is not common in the MRA to call women feminazis (Most women are not feminists and very few are radical feminists). I would never apply that term to women in general, or even feminists in general. I am specifically referring to feminists who speak of men in the same terms used by Nazis to speak of all the people they consider inferior. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/12 06:41 PM |
| 4 | Traditional Nazi or FeminaziThanks. It's fixed now. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/12 06:06 PM |
| 1 | When the facts don't support patriarchy theory what does a RadeFem do? Just blame men for being too innately screwed up to benefit from "their own" system.Capitalization is the difference between helping your Uncle Jack off a horse and helping your Uncle jack off a horse. Of course, to them, jacking off a female horse would be preferable to doing anything to help a human male. Jacking off a male horse would be something they would find as distasteful as any normal person would, but not because it is bestiality. Instead, it is because they have such a burning, obsessive hatred with all things having anything to do with penises of any species. | /r/MensRights | 10/10/12 02:59 PM |
| 10 | Defending rape and defending the right of a Human Being to a Fair Trial are two completely different things.And yet, what if a woman, doesn't feel raped, even though she was "raped" according to some ridiculous feminist definition (e.g. she had a few drinks and was slightly tipsy, though far from incapacitated, and enthusiastically initiated sex)? In that case her feelings don't matter, feminists say she was raped, therefore she was, no matter how vehemently she insists otherwise. Feelings are always right when they support feminist doctrine and always wrong when they don't. Interesting how that works… | /r/MensRights | 02/10/12 03:55 AM |
| 12 | When the facts don't support patriarchy theory what does a RadeFem do? Just blame men for being too innately screwed up to benefit from "their own" system.Yes, good call, Typhon! They didn't make the distinction between divorced (or widowed) and never married. That would have made for more interesting comparisons, and probably ones the Society for Cutting Up Male infants didn't like. | /r/MensRights | 01/10/12 09:14 PM |
| 7 | When the facts don't support patriarchy theory what does a RadeFem do? Just blame men for being too innately screwed up to benefit from "their own" system.Note: I used "RadFem" instead of "feminist" in this title to give mainstream feminists the benefit of the doubt. Not because mainstream feminists don't ever make such twists in logic to try to uphold the patriarchy theory, but because I believe there are some mainstream feminists who, when this absurdity is pointed out to them will begin to reconsider their positions. I don't want to cause any feminists, who might have their minds opened to rational discussion, to slam that door shut because I i… | /r/MensRights | 01/10/12 06:35 PM |
| 45 | Defending rape and defending the right of a Human Being to a Fair Trial are two completely different things.Melissa McEwan once called The False Rape Society a "pro-rape site." This was in response to The FRS publishing McEwan's own words blatantly and unambiguously defending false-rape accusers: Well, what do you want the police to do—just let women who make false reports GET AWAY WITH IT?! Yes. That is exactly what I want. | /r/MensRights | 01/10/12 05:39 PM |
| 3 | Yet another male feminist attempts, and fails, to appease Radfems by degrading himself and his fellow men.Yes, I know you would. So would most female MRAs/MRA sympathizers that I know of. This is why I have infinitely more respect for you than I do for male feminists in general (with a few exceptions like ballgame at Feminist Critics or Warren Farrell when he identified as a feminist). | /r/MensRights | 23/08/12 12:57 PM |
| 4 | Yet another male feminist attempts, and fails, to appease Radfems by degrading himself and his fellow men.An argument could be made, I think, that the MRM is a leftist group, as leftism fights for equality(or claims to do so). I don't think equality is the sole property of the left. I think that most of the left-right division is a matter of semantics anyway. Some consider Nazism leftist, while others argue Stalinism is rightist. Both camps have some good points but in the end it doesn't matter - both Nazism and Stalinism are evil. Whether a movement is right or left is not crucial to determining wh… | /r/MensRights | 22/08/12 07:58 PM |
| 9 | Yet another male feminist attempts, and fails, to appease Radfems by degrading himself and his fellow men.Excerpt of article with most relevant comments: http://imgur.com/RPiuM | /r/MensRights | 22/08/12 05:24 PM |
| 16 | Yet another male feminist attempts, and fails, to appease Radfems by degrading himself and his fellow men.Yes, misandry does seem to be blind spot in so many self-proclaimed champions of tolerance and inclusion. A comment on The Deep Green News Service, where this was originally posted got to the heart of it: ...I fear black people and muslims at night when I see them walking in a group I hide... I'm pretty sure this person was being sarcastic, but either way, it is a clear display of just how bigoted the Radfem mentality is. | /r/MensRights | 22/08/12 04:27 PM |
| 6 | "Letter to White Men" « Matrifocal Point - arrogant racist feminist begs "white men" to clean up, put on a suit and use their privilege to "make change"I shall order one of my trusted servants to arrange a meeting with the President of the United States and all of the Congresspeople, at once. Then, I shall command the aforementioned elected officials to immediately create a better society or suffer my mighty white male wrath! | /r/MensRights | 15/04/12 08:18 PM |
| 1 | What's Wrong With "Men Can Stop Rape" ???Most rapists are typical violent criminals who engage in a variety of crimes and other rights-violating behaviors throughout their lives. Most real rapists that is. Most men can't do much to stop real rape. What most men could do is stop having heterosexual sex and therefore stop all of the normal behavior that gender feminists conflate with rape (such as a man who, may or may not be intoxicated himself having sex with a woman who has had one whole glass of wine with dinner or - ZOMG! - persuadi… | /r/MensRights | 11/04/12 05:39 AM |
| 1 | What feminist websites deserve to be on the SPLC's list of hate sites?http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/ http://rageagainstthemanchine.com/ http://allecto.wordpress.com/ http://aroomofourown.wordpress.com/ http://www.feminisms.org/blog/ http://radicalprofeminist.blogspot.com/ Some of these do occasionally cover their hate with a veneer of rationality and I don't have the time or energy tonight to go through each of them to find find their "Greatest Misandric Hits." However, you should not have to look long to find hatred that at least matches the most extreme vi… | /r/MensRights | 09/04/12 11:23 PM |
| 0 | You Are A False Rape Accusation Supporter If ...Yes, I am whoring my own blog here. So sue me! | /r/MensRights | 17/12/11 12:27 AM |
| 1 | factcheckme's "nigel" has 99 problems and a bitch is all 99 of them!Thanks for pointing that out. Maybe I shouldn't have tried to be "clever" with the title when I posted this but that's no excuse for not reading the link. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/11 02:18 PM |
| 2 | Unfortunately I can’t cut the nuts off human men — yet,” - “So I’ve dedicated my time to the neutering of dogs because that’s legal.”I understand what you're saying, and I agree we all need to have a sense of humor about ourselves. I know MRAs do sometimes go too far and become the mirror image of humorless feminists. I think this is different, though, because of the way many women, and some men, in the media treat real life stories of women cutting off men's penises as a joke. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/11 04:09 PM |
| 8 | Circumciser with 20 years experience, cuts off baby's penisBrain damaged drunk driver gets in a car accident, kills and maims several innocent people. We must keep brain damaged drunk drivers on the road, though, since misinformed and superstitious parents think it is healthy and God's will for their newborn babies to ride with such drivers. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/11 04:05 AM |
| -3 | Unfortunately I can’t cut the nuts off human men — yet,” - “So I’ve dedicated my time to the neutering of dogs because that’s legal.”The site this disgusting shit is posted on is called "Funny or Die". Well, if "Funny or Die?" is the question, I know what the answer is. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/11 03:51 AM |
| 1 | Anti- Male Ads, the Big ListThere are some commercials in that list that show real misandry (the PepsiMax and the SafeAuto groin kick commercial in particular). All the more is the pity that the blogger would include ridiculous examples. Anyone who saw this not familiar with the MRM would think that MRAs were a bunch of whiners no better than the humorless feminists who raise holy hell any time a woman is shown as being less intelligent than a rocket scientist, or (God forbid!) sexually appealing! Stevejohn made a good a p… | /r/MensRights | 23/11/11 12:51 AM |
| 5 | Feminists Are Afraid Of Evolutionary Psychology, And With Good ReasonNot necessarily. Many evolutionary psychologists simply try to explain why things are a certain way, not that they have to be that way. Male polygamy and female hypergamy can be seen as natural but not necessarily right. If you want to change certain behaviors, it helps to know their causes. For example knowing that many of our ancestors needed to store fat for times of starvation explains why many people crave high calorie foods, and can be used to treat the problem of obesity scientifically, r… | /r/MensRights | 20/11/11 07:12 PM |
| 10 | Feminists tore up their side of the social gender contract and are desperate to keep men upholding their unbroken side of that contract.The problem is almost all feminists are attached to the Patriarchy/Rape culture stuff and those who aren't are considered traitors by other feminists. MRAs who are against equal rights should drop that (note that equal rights do not necessarily mean equal results). But many people who are for equal rights also consider themselves "anti-feminist" because of the way most feminists define the term (a belief that Patriarchy and Rape Culture not only exist but are the source of all that is wrong in t… | /r/MensRights | 20/11/11 06:32 PM |
| 3 | Feminists tore up their side of the social gender contract and are desperate to keep men upholding their unbroken side of that contract.Where did this discussion come from? Who brought up "racial realism" in the first place and who said what it is supposed to mean? | /r/MensRights | 20/11/11 06:16 PM |
| 3 | "Your penis that you as a man are in control of is not in anyway like a strap-on. It is a weapon of war, pregnancy and rape. "To certain radical feminists, pregnancy is worse than anything you could do with your feet, your teeth or your hands, even if one or both of your hands was holding a weapon in the more conventional sense of the word. Of course, using your penis against such women would likely be even more painful for you than it would be for them! | /r/MensRights | 12/11/11 10:31 PM |
| 2 | I'm not voting for Obama because he whored himself out to Goldman Sachs and the rest of 'em. But, I wouldn't vote for him anyway, because...And not that I think that Ron Paul is the best possible candidate we could ever have, there are Libertarian party members who may well be better than him, and Gary Johnson (if he's still running) could arguably be considered better as well. But to say that Paul is not better than any mainstream presidential candidate we've had for the past 20 years, you have to be ignorant of his record. | /r/MensRights | 07/11/11 02:06 AM |
| 1 | I'm not voting for Obama because he whored himself out to Goldman Sachs and the rest of 'em. But, I wouldn't vote for him anyway, because...Ron Paul won't do anything more for us than Obama has already. He will cater to the lobbies that make the most noise just like every other politician in Washington. A highly uninformed, non-fact-based comment. | /r/MensRights | 07/11/11 02:00 AM |
| 2 | Rape can only be "committed by a man", at least by Google's definitionEven if you could get the word "rape" removed from the law it would still be used by most people in their common vocabulary. It is too powerful a word to just go away. Given that, and given the fact that the word "rape" has a much more emotional impact than the clinical sounding "sexual assault" it is a matter of justice to demand that any recognized authority for defining words should define "rape" in the most gender-neutral way possible. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/11 12:59 AM |
| 2 | Rape can only be "committed by a man", at least by Google's definitionIt is a step in the right direction but is missing a key point - envelopment of the penis with any body part or object, without the consent of the victim. There is still the presumption that unwanted penetration is worse than unwanted envelopment. While the use of "objects" and unspecified body parts means that the perpetrator can be of either sex, the implication is clear that penetration is masculine and envelopment is feminine, meaning that the "masculine role" is assumed to have more power t… | /r/MensRights | 06/11/11 12:22 AM |
| 2 | Cain Is Guilty Until Proven Innocent, Feminists SayI'm a libertarian and I find most of Cain's policy proposals interesting but not particularly inspiring. I agree, though, that he should be considered innocent until proven guilty. And the fact that the Restaurant Association paid off a few complainers to avoid a lawsuit means nothing - as breakwater said "one reportedly settled for 35k, which would have been far less than the cost of a successful defense, which is to say nothing of the PR damage even false claims bring." In the company I work I… | /r/MensRights | 03/11/11 01:29 AM |
| 1 | Elam vs Frost: Round 3 Game and PUA, just a bunch of P-houndsSeems like a needless division based on personality conflicts. | /r/MensRights | 03/11/11 01:01 AM |
| 4 | "Evil Patriarchy" oppresses women who only want to MURDER BABY BOYS!Yes, deleting your posts is pretty fucked up - half of JulianMorrison's don't make sense without the posts of yours they were replying to. And I'd really like to know what they found so offensive about your posts that they had to delete every single one. I guess they realized that your arguments were just too good for their lame rebuttals to convince anyone not already a part of their choir. | /r/MensRights | 02/11/11 12:04 AM |
| 2 | "Evil Patriarchy" oppresses women who only want to MURDER BABY BOYS!I agree but I don't think most mainstream feminists have done enough to distance themselves from the truly hateful scum like this. The ones who do, e.g. Cathy Young, Wendy McElroy, and Christina Hoff-Sommers, often get called traitors by other feminists. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/11 04:43 PM |
| 2 | "Evil Patriarchy" oppresses women who only want to MURDER BABY BOYS!I agree with ValiantPie. No reason you should feel bad for sharing a gender with those hideous freaks, any more than the men here should feel guilty because of that very small proportion of men who are rapists. Very good comment otherwise, though, venereveritas. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/11 02:58 PM |
| 2 | "Evil Patriarchy" oppresses women who only want to MURDER BABY BOYS!FWIW, I reported her to WordPress. Anyone else who wants to do so, use this link: wordpress.com/abuse | /r/MensRights | 30/10/11 06:39 PM |
| 3 | "Evil Patriarchy" oppresses women who only want to MURDER BABY BOYS!Without knowing her real name or her location we don't have much to go on. Does anybody know if the DHS, the FBI or a similar agency has a procedure for reporting anonymous bloggers who make terroristic threats? | /r/MensRights | 30/10/11 04:45 PM |
| 5 | "Evil Patriarchy" oppresses women who only want to MURDER BABY BOYS!I think I remember The Man on the Street from anti-misandry.com once having a line in his signature about how everything would be fine until they needed someone to fix the toilets. Now I know that there are some women who can fix toilets but, based on their whining about every little thing that doesn't go their way, I doubt that there's one among those spoiled brats whose ever gotten her hands dirty other than when masturbating. | /r/MensRights | 30/10/11 04:32 PM |
| 13 | "Evil Patriarchy" oppresses women who only want to MURDER BABY BOYS!I've often wondered about the applicability of Poe's law, myself. It is surely true that no MRA, or other opponent of feminism, seeking to create a parody to discredit feminism could do a better job of it than this cult. | /r/MensRights | 30/10/11 03:44 PM |
| 1 | How ugly can misandry get? From the site Patriarchy Watch : "If you’re a heterosexual RadFem, you have to face the fact that you’re kind of into bestiality. One of the conundrums for us heterosexual Radfems is our sexual attraction to our oppressor."OK. Sometimes its hard to tell on the internet when someone is joking or being serious. It is clear that these women (womyn?) DO have ISSUES, whatever the source. | /r/MensRights | 23/10/11 07:51 PM |
| 1 | How ugly can misandry get? From the site Patriarchy Watch : "If you’re a heterosexual RadFem, you have to face the fact that you’re kind of into bestiality. One of the conundrums for us heterosexual Radfems is our sexual attraction to our oppressor."Could have been their fathers were overindulgent. Could have been that their mothers had horrible attitudes toward men and their fathers were too weak to counter these. Or maybe they grew up with two decent parents but were corrupted by bad friends, bad teachers, negative media influences, etc. The roots of evil are not always simple to trace. Sometimes mass-murdering psychopaths grow up in the same households as pillars of the community. Best not assume either parent is at fault without some in… | /r/MensRights | 23/10/11 04:47 AM |
| 1 | Dilbert author deletes his "get over it" post, but the Internet never forgetsJimmyjango42 didn't actually say that the situation of men in general today is as bad as that of blacks in the pre-civil rights-era. In fact he said it is not, by mentioning the fact that we don't have to face attack dogs, fire hoses, etc. It doesn't have to be as bad to be similar, and to call for similar strategies. Or do you believe our situation does have to get as bad as that of Jim Crow-era blacks before we have any right to complain? | /r/MensRights | 28/03/11 01:44 PM |
| 0 | Hateful Feminist Extremist loses her grip on her male abuse victimThe following is what I wrote as a comment on femonade. I know factcheckme will never publish it but there is a slight hope that she will read it herself (I do have some fear that this will make things even worse for her "nigel" but maybe he will have to hit rock bottom before finally having the courage to escape): FCM,has your abuse victim (i.e. your "nigel") finally left you? I wish I could help him. I hope he has family and friends to help him escape your clutches. Maybe he is worried your re… | /r/MensRights | 27/02/11 08:27 PM |
| 2 | So I went to get my Carry Concealed Weapons Permit class done today. . .Don't get me wrong I'm not in favor of white knighting, I don't think you should get involved in a lovers quarrel without knowing who's at fault, and certainly don't get involved if it's only yelling with no physical violence. Still, if a civilian trained to use firearms decides to intervene in what he sees as a dangerous situation, he has as much right to as the police. Individual cops may be decent people, but power tends to corrupt. Especially when people put the cops on a pedestal, believing… | /r/MensRights | 21/02/11 05:02 PM |
| 2 | So I went to get my Carry Concealed Weapons Permit class done today. . .I upvoted you above abortifacient, but I took it back because of that. I am not an anarchist, because I think some very minimal government is needed to keep the peace but I certainly sympathize with the idea of getting rid of all government. Besides, SpykerSpeed made some excellent points and did not deserve to be voted down just because of a label. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/11 04:40 PM |
| 2 | Apparently heterosexual missionary position sex is anti-feminist "because ... it isn't even sex". That's right guys, even consensual sex = rape.factcheckme is a perfect case study in what happens to a mind obsessed with hatred and scapegoating. Look at some of her earlier posts (like from August 2009, http://factcheckme.wordpress.com/2009/08/ when she started her blog) and you'll find plenty of rage and venom, but at least some connection to reality. As she indulged more and more in hatred (not limited to, but particularly targeted at, men) she gradually lost whatever grounding in reality she had. This is what allows her to believe, as … | /r/MensRights | 30/12/10 08:48 PM |
| 1 | Will there ever be equal rights if men have an obvious advantage in courts?This would actually be a good question if you changed the word "men" to "women" or "advantage" to "disadvantage." To answer your question, "I am all for equal rights, equal wages and equal opportunity but until the justice system is fixed can there really be equality?" No there cannot be, but it seems that you a backwards view of what's wrong with the courts. Aside from the misleading statement about women "mak[ing] 76 cents for every dollar a man makes (when incidentally women make as much as o… | /r/MensRights | 28/12/09 03:03 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter