| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Male prisoners will likely die of Coronavirus because they lack basic sanitation. Tweet with me to seek justice.Tell that to the family who just lost their child because some maniac raped and butchered their daughter while leaving her body in a drainage ditch. You know, you're right though. We shouldn't waste all that time and tax payer money on such animals. A 25 cent bullet works just fine. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/20 08:47 PM |
| 1 | Male prisoners will likely die of Coronavirus because they lack basic sanitation. Tweet with me to seek justice.That's exactly why I stopped working prisons. The inmate to guard ratio was WAY off and, quite literally, the animals are in charge of the zoo. If I had to take someone down because they were attacking another inmate with, let's say a padlock or a home-made shiv - I had to write a full report on the incident and answer to a board of prison officials as they investigated the incident. Meanwhile, the nutjob with the padlock and blood on his hands was whining to their lawyer about how they had been… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/20 11:27 AM |
| 0 | Male prisoners will likely die of Coronavirus because they lack basic sanitation. Tweet with me to seek justice.Getting rather testy there. If something you can do nothing about, such as a virus, scares you this much then I hope you are going to be ok. There are a number of resources available to assist with high stress situations that people have trouble dealing with. All I have done is share the facts. What you do with that is up to you. Bottom line is most people in jail and or prison deserve to be there and, as such, made their choices so they have no right to whine about it as if we are supposed to f… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/20 10:58 AM |
| 0 | Male prisoners will likely die of Coronavirus because they lack basic sanitation. Tweet with me to seek justice.Oh, believe me, women's prison is no better. In fact, in some ways it's a hell of a lot worse. I had a buddy tell me he had to run a woman to the ER in the middle of the night once because her room mates decided they didn't like her hair. They set it on fire and sodomized her with a piece of the bed while holding her down. In prison, if you're the one on the pedestal - you're also the one with a giant f'ing target on your back. Doesn't matter if your male or female. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/20 09:57 AM |
| -1 | Male prisoners will likely die of Coronavirus because they lack basic sanitation. Tweet with me to seek justice.The majority of incarcerated prisoners are there for nonviolent crimes? Nearly 60% of prison inmates serving a year or more are there for violent crimes. I assume you know basic math and know the definition of the word "majority"? I have first-hand knowledge. I read the jackets of every single inmate I was in charge of while employed by the State of Indiana. Nearly every single one of them were there for rape, murder, child molestation (the youngest being a NEWBORN) and abduction. And, city pris… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/20 09:47 AM |
| -3 | Male prisoners will likely die of Coronavirus because they lack basic sanitation. Tweet with me to seek justice.Again, I used to work at a correctional facility. Max security. They receive better care on the inside than people do on the outside, and that's a fact. Meds, every day and paid for. Doctor visits? All they need to do is ask; paid for. Dental problems? Seen to and paid for within a week. Paid for by who? The state tax payers on the outside who are doing the right thing every day but still need to pay taxes to take care of some of the true monsters on the inside. These are people who earned their… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/20 03:45 AM |
| -2 | Male prisoners will likely die of Coronavirus because they lack basic sanitation. Tweet with me to seek justice.They are in prison... 99% of which are there for valid and horrible reasons. I used to work at a correctional facility in Indiana, and trust me, most of the inmates get better care on the inside than people do working their asses off on the outside. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/20 02:40 AM |
| 2 | Just incase you missed it: Teacher, 27, said she was "entitled" to have ‘deviant’ sex with sports star schoolboy, 18 and had also claimed that it was "unconstitutional" for her to be charged for the sexual acts.They are both of consenting age. The teacher worked at a middle school - and unless this kid was dumb as a box of rocks - at age 18 he was WELL outside of middle school range. There is nothing here. I am actually more upset that the teacher is being charged with anything. If it had been a student from her school? Absolutely! Nail her to the f'ing wall. But this is not that type of scenario whatsoever. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/20 03:56 AM |
| 9 | A female spreading into a mans private space on a plane and his reaction has the internet going in a spiral. But Amber Heard’s admitted violence and lies about it ??? Crickets.How in the world do you connect actual physical violence, to a woman putting her chair back? You know how feminists are known these days for going off the deep end because of stupid shit that doesn't really matter? Well, you're in danger of going off the same cliff with stupid posts like this. Listen, I am all for getting more light on social issues that men have to deal with in an unjust/unfair social structure. However, we are still MEN. If you're going to bitch and whine about e.v.e.r.y.t.h.i… | /r/MensRights | 13/02/20 11:29 PM |
| 3 | The dating market, dating pools, ratios, red-pilled: "The Skewed and the Screwed: When Mating Meets Politics"Thank you, and you make a good point. Do you think that may be exactly what we are seeing these days in regards to the social structure, because that's what I see. A bunch of people on both sides who are pointing out flaws and alienating each other as a direct result. Instead of embracing the fact that there are differences and working to accept those as part of the deal - too many people seem laser-focused on them as if they are somehow something we can change. Men and women are inherently diff… | /r/MensRights | 02/02/20 02:28 AM |
| 6 | The dating market, dating pools, ratios, red-pilled: "The Skewed and the Screwed: When Mating Meets Politics"Curious position to take. Would you mind explaining? I read it as a general statement that is very true. No one is owed anything in life. Everyone has the same chances as anyone else, the difference being whether or not an individual puts in the work and EARNS what they want. Yet, you can still find yourself in a position where you've worked your ass off for something and you still lose. It's still not owed to you. And, applying this to relationships, in my experience when people start comparing… | /r/MensRights | 02/02/20 01:40 AM |
| -7 | Clipping a dog's ears is illegal, but removing the foreskin isn't!Yes, it would be trite of you. Whether or not I played sports has no meaning in this discussion. And, thanks for proving my point in regard to irrational/emotional responses. That would be a prime example of it. You state this is something we should all embrace as part of the 21st century, and follow that up by asking a question/attempting to shut me down with something I would expect a three year old to say. Well done. I keep seeing the same argument again and again. That being, non-circumcised… | /r/MensRights | 26/01/20 01:48 AM |
| -7 | Clipping a dog's ears is illegal, but removing the foreskin isn't!I've waded into this debate a few times. Evidence is denied and logic goes out the window because, much like any other irrational argument based on emotion rather than facts, people would rather be "right" than listen to reason. For a group of men who seemingly want to have a discussion - you all seem to fall into the same emotional/irrational arguments that the women's rights groups fall into and irrationally focus on. I have never once ran into a single male in my life who has EVER been concer… | /r/MensRights | 26/01/20 12:10 AM |
| -21 | Male circumcision greatly increases risk of urinary tract problemsUh huh... Keep trying. From the United States National Library of Medicine National Institute of Health - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6119846/ "The hazard ratio (HR) for UTI of circumcised boys was 0.29 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15–0.58) compared to uncircumcised boys. Using the propensity-matched control, circumcision was associated with a 75% lower rate of UTI (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.10–0.54) comparing the propensity matched cohort." Plus, I keep seeing the same argument o… | /r/MensRights | 25/01/20 05:12 AM |
| -27 | Male circumcision greatly increases risk of urinary tract problemsYou're actually stating that "He’s a retired molecular biology professor" as if that is grounds to dismiss the evidence? Really? Fine. https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/factsheets/mc-factsheet-508.pdf A retired molecular biology professor who cited a paper from the CDC. "Health benefits: Male circumcision can dramatically reduce a man’s risk of acquiring HIV infection by 50 to 60 percent during sex with HIV infected female partners. Circumcised men have been shown in clinical trials to b… | /r/MensRights | 25/01/20 04:53 AM |
| -36 | Male circumcision greatly increases risk of urinary tract problemsFalse. It has been proven false time and time again. Unites States Center for Disease Control - courtesy of an article published here - https://www.ghspjournal.org/content/5/1/15"After an extensive evaluation of the scientific evidence, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released draft policy recommendations in December 2014 affirming male circumcision (MC) as an important public health measure." The New York Times - https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/04/07/circu… | /r/MensRights | 25/01/20 03:01 AM |
| -2 | Lost Boys. Over 100 boys die unnecessarily in US as a result of circumcision.This thread is extremely misleading. Critical thinking is a gift people - please use it. You have an entire worlds worth of knowledge at your fingertips. At least do a little personal research before swallowing every little pill the internet wants to shove down your throat. The article itself points out that these deaths cannot be attributed wholly to circumcision alone but other compounding circumstances after the procedure was completed. I'll highlight the excerpts - again - from the very arti… | /r/MensRights | 24/01/20 05:16 AM |
| 1 | HOW THE FUCK IS CIRCUMCISION LEGALUnites States Center for Disease Control - courtesy of an article published here - https://www.ghspjournal.org/content/5/1/15"After an extensive evaluation of the scientific evidence, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released draft policy recommendations in December 2014 affirming male circumcision (MC) as an important public health measure." The New York Times - https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/04/07/circumcision-benefits-outweigh-risks-study-reports/"The au… | /r/MensRights | 23/01/20 04:34 AM |
| -2 | Do you think it's possible that having males circumcised as infants could increase the chance of causing them psychological problems?So, in short, after providing significant scientific-based facts - from resources renowned and respected around the world - you still say there is "absolutely zero relevance to the health of an infant or child."? Thank you for making my point in regard to bias. You'd rather be "right" and ignore those facts because they don't fit within your chosen narrative. I am done with you. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/20 01:01 AM |
| -1 | Do you think it's possible that having males circumcised as infants could increase the chance of causing them psychological problems?u/jimmi-jones I am not surprised whatsoever that my argument went against the grain so it has been hidden from view. This is solely based on down-voting simply because scientific fact is apparently unappreciated. Such tactics are childish and sad to see. Especially on a platform that is, supposedly, open to the accurate discussion of Men's Rights. I didn't have the time (yesterday - edit), or the energy, to provide resources. These were incredibly easy to locate however. Meanwhile - I had to do … | /r/MensRights | 22/01/20 09:32 PM |
| 1 | Do you think it's possible that having males circumcised as infants could increase the chance of causing them psychological problems?What else is there to say? Your bias is plain in your argument, you highlight only articles that help your opinion, and you are clearly more involved with being "right" than actually considering another point of view based not only on scientific fact but common sense and critical thinking skills. In other words, I have nothing to prove - least of all to you. I don't care about being right. I care about facts. It seems we must simply agree to disagree. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/20 09:58 AM |
| -2 | Do you think it's possible that having males circumcised as infants could increase the chance of causing them psychological problems?And yet, for thousands of years since it's practice, male children who went through circumcision have been perfectly fine, healthy, and experienced no damage to their psyche as a result- as the OP seems to claim. Again, it's common sense. It's also scientific fact. But, really, who cares whether one parent chooses to circumcise while another may not? I was simply providing the alternative argument and pointing out the false representation that there is a history of psychological damage to males … | /r/MensRights | 22/01/20 08:14 AM |
| -4 | Do you think it's possible that having males circumcised as infants could increase the chance of causing them psychological problems?You're making a claim that is just plain wrong. Feel free to search for yourself and you'll see what you are claiming to be true is actually just the opposite. As I stated in my original response, my son is three. Every doctor we talked to highly recommended circumcision for the greater benefits health-wise and in the long run. And, again, even a simple search will provide more than enough evidence to not only support this, but back it up with actual scientific facts. Alternatively, there is ver… | /r/MensRights | 22/01/20 07:30 AM |
| -11 | Do you think it's possible that having males circumcised as infants could increase the chance of causing them psychological problems?This is one of those arguments that - much like the feminist movement - is a GIANT RED FLAG that you may be headed off the rails and taking things too far if you want to be considered a legitimate movement. Male circumcision has been in practice for thousands of years. To suggest that now, all of a sudden, this extremely common practice is somehow harmful to the male psyche is ludicrous and reeks of - to put it bluntly - stupidity and goes against common sense. Let's not forget that psychology i… | /r/MensRights | 22/01/20 04:48 AM |
| 5 | Need some help.The best advice I can offer is simple - yet challenging. Stand your ground. It may mean that others take that as an opportunity to talk behind your back, but the true mark of self-confidence and maturity is learning to stand tall, stay true, and let others talk while you're busy doing. Let them talk. Sometimes the hardest thing to do it make the stand in the face of opposition - and that goes for whatever that stand is. But, I guarantee you'll not only feel strangely empowered by it, but you'll … | /r/MensRights | 22/01/20 01:47 AM |
| 12 | Welcome to Marriage in the MilitaryThis is disgusting on so many levels. Not only as a veteran, but as a single father myself who has sole custody of both his children... things like this remind me why it might be a good thing I am single... Not only is she basically advocating for her husbands death by suicide, she is asking HOW to PROFIT from it? I hope her husband gets a screenshot of this question, hands it to his lawyer, and they use it to bury her in court. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/20 01:30 AM |
| 3 | Man requests sword fight with ex-wife to settle legal disputeI demand a trial by combat! | /r/MensRights | 18/01/20 03:19 AM |
| 1 | r/femaledatingstrategy really showed me how some women view men, and I am scared as fuck. Are gay men welcomed in r/mensrights? I am finally starting to see it your way.After reading your post I took a moment to browse through the area myself and my God... it's no wonder I have been single for over three years now. You hear people talking about #toxicmasculinity - but from what I have seen it's the exact opposite. Are there asshole men out there? Absolutely! But, in general, I believe men are rather good at weeding those people out and holding them responsible when and where they are able to. Of course, there are many, MANY, times when a man will do just that a… | /r/MensRights | 17/01/20 09:17 PM |
| 4 | Genius idea: in the case of a person having to pay child support, the person should pay money to the local government, who will in turn buy things necessary for the guardian. It prevents the abuse of funds given to them in the first place!As a single father whom has never received the child support ordered for nearly 17 years now, this is a horrible idea. The government should have NO say on when, where, how, or what that money is spent on. I am sure there are those who abuse it and I do believe there should be more options available in order to make sure that is stopped, but, I can just imagine the bureaucracy and red-tape this would cause every time I needed to make a purchase. Especially as a single-father with sole custody of… | /r/MensRights | 17/01/20 04:04 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter