TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MechaSixVII Archive

View 3 posts and 111 comments by MechaSixVII on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

End of the 19th century and start of the 20th. We define it historically.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 03:28 AM
1

I'm being logical. Nor did I.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 03:22 AM
1

That is a contradiction, to explicitly say that men and women are one with god, then to also explicitly say "I suffer not a woman" is a contradiction. Ex contradictione sequitur quodlibet. You can say he's a humanitarian and an egalitarian, and you can say he's a misogynist. But the law of noncontradiction states that neither must be true, so I cannot justly call him a humanist or egalitarian. X → ~Y ~(X ^ Y) v Z X ^ Y ∴ Z
/r/MensRights24/06/12 02:06 AM
-1

I think we can't forget that Paul, or Saul of Tarsus as he was known, was literally a madman. He was a murderer who had a revelation on the road to jerusalem. You also have to remember that a lot of rules and principles preached by saul were contradictory. I cannot and will not say that Saul is a humanist, because he did not believe all to be equal. "I suffer not a woman." Additionally he proclaimed that women "be silent." Furthermore, other people he didn't consider to be equal in god's light i…
/r/MensRights23/06/12 09:30 PM
1

The Fact of the matter is that there are pioneering feminists who are women. Mary Wollstonecraft, Susan B. Anthony, Harriot Taylor Mill, they are pioneering feminists, especially since they started before the 20th century, which at the turn of, was when feminism as an entity started.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 08:19 PM
6

On the subjugation of women was written by John Stuart Mill, and his wife Harriot Taylor Mill. As well, there's famous pioneering feminists like Mary Wollstonecraft, mother of Mary Shelley, in addition to possibly the most famous feminist to ever exist, Susan B. Anthony. Learn your history, son.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 06:45 PM
19

the pioneers of feminism were men and women. Not just men.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 04:00 PM
5

as a woman you don't need to apologize for anything, their behaviour is not indicative of your entire gender, just like the behaviour of some men is not indicative of our entire gender.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 05:37 PM
1

Seems like it sometimes doesn't it?
/r/MensRights12/06/12 06:14 AM
0

Just don't bring it up to her. She'll always feel victimized by you talking about it and needing evidence based assertions.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 12:20 AM
2

you go out and rape the rapists! and yes you can have a cape for your dick.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 03:44 PM
1

Anthropomorphization doesn't require engendering. Make them oblong spheres with eyes and arms. Bam. Anthropomorphized.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 06:46 AM
2

Why engender fat molecules at all?
/r/MensRights07/05/12 08:14 PM
2

Well, just fight for what you can see as equality, but firstly, I'm pretty sure you have much more immediate rights you should be fighting for as a transperson. It's wonderful that you want to seek equal rights for men, and wish to be part of it in interest for your own rights. But I'm certain there's things that will affect you more immediately than things that affect both you and me, speaking as a fellow with a Y chromosome. As for men's rights excluding transrights... those are different issu…
/r/MensRights07/05/12 08:07 PM
1

I don't want any upvotes Too bad.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 09:37 PM
3

This has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 06:48 AM
2

by claiming to be a true feminist and feminists that oppose men's rights or are actively propose the extermination of men aren't true feminists because of it. No true feminist opposes men's rights No true scotsman doesn't like haggis
/r/MensRights10/04/12 06:03 AM
3

Politics and Poetics may be similar superficially but the effectiveness of one will always be to the detriment of the other.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 01:42 AM
9

True Feminist No True Scotsman.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 01:20 AM
3

I need to buy you a beer.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:08 AM
2

Right, because logical reasoning and rationality is abusive to women. I always seem to forget that.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 01:32 PM
3

Damn straight!!
/r/MensRights04/04/12 05:01 AM
13

Or... people that just like seeing attractive women naked. Aka Most of the People on Earth.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 01:32 AM
2

She's a sexist coward.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 01:30 AM
2

Dictionary definition. Not my position.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 01:14 AM
0

That's a definition, but it doesn't cover all aspects of being called a whore. A whore is one who debases themselves for shallow unworthy motives, typically money. Such as selling out musically and becoming a musical whore.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 01:01 AM
2

As you should. You mean the one with the horrendously small sample size? The one that was pulled? Peer review is an endlessly ongoing process, not a conclusion.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 07:04 PM
1

So? If her work's peer reviewed, then there's no issue.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 06:30 PM
1

No, I'm afraid I don't know what the original study is called. It'd be great if newspapers cited their sources.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 06:00 PM
1

oops, I was wrong, it's girls as age 4 and boys by the age of 8
/r/MensRights03/04/12 05:12 PM
1

Which part are you requiring a source for? Or do you just want all the sources possible, because that'll take me a little bit collecting them together. I just ask for patience.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 05:03 PM
1

Oop, typo You can be racist without having some sort of poorly defined conception of privilege which proposes that all members of a social group are identical. That's it fixed.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 04:15 PM
2

Thanks, man. Really, I just needed to vent.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 10:39 AM
2

90% of it was written by me, in a variety of comments, all of it was edited together to a point of coherence and expanded upon. On request, I could rewrite it as symbolic logic to show that it is all deductive, and logically sound.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 09:46 AM
1

Dem Pheromones.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 07:42 AM
11

It's depicting horrors, you don't show something not morally reprehensible when you're attempting to depict something horrible.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 05:58 PM
2

.... WHAT
/r/MensRights18/03/12 04:15 PM
1

Thanks man.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 01:29 PM
3

They're 38 too, they're realizing that their youth and attractiveness is all drying up and that they've been coasting on these traits for most of their lives and they aren't as talented or funny as people have been telling them they are. Whereas you didn't have that benefit in your youth, because the girls thought you were creepy, so you grew up having to prove your worth.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:47 AM
2

Because the principle that if you're not a feminist, you're a bigot, it's the principle of the infidel, and it's one that does not belong in rational discourse.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:05 AM
2

I don't think OP is wrong for posting there at all.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 03:41 PM
1

common sense is less common than you think it is.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 03:40 PM
10

That was the right move sir.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:53 AM
11

judging from my recent foray commenting on LGBT, I very much like the average LGBT reader.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:49 AM
26

The willfully and proudly ignorant. sigh
/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:41 AM
61

It's what happens when people are unable to accept the possibility that they could be wrong.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 03:48 AM
6

This is tragic. The Father should've been granted custody of his son, this is ridiculous that this could ever happen.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 02:55 AM
-2

we use the same google chrome skin!
/r/MensRights15/03/12 03:24 PM
6

No no no, I get what you mean, just the idea that anyone ANYWHERE would seriously use the word "mansplaining" seriously and value emotional arguments over logical ones. That hurts my head. That's just horrifyingly idiotic.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:15 AM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:09 AM
6

Again, Wat. I understand what you wrote, the individual words make sense, but when they're strung together they become gibberish. Why would anyone think that's a valid mode of discourse? Only emotional arguments, thats... nonsense.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:02 AM
7

Wat.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 04:52 AM
5

there was a lot of posts lately telling people who frequent this board to not be angry, and to not be aggressive, and to not take a combative tone with people, feminists in particular. OP's post is a good post, it points how ridiculous arguing that we can fight for our rights, as long as we do it nicely, really is.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 03:45 AM
2

Your line of reasoning is sound, I agree that they shouldn't be given the chance to take the stance of a victim, because they'll take it. But being silent about these issues is not a good idea, not at all.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:23 AM
-8

Abuse is abuse, her being mean and abusive in that manner is wrong, it is horribly wrong, physical abuse is also wrong, her saying "grow a back bone" to you is as bad as saying learn self-defence to a woman. Although, in my opinion, you should've punched her in the jaw. Really cracked it. Left her crying on the ground. It's good that she's your ex now, and it'd be the best if you didn't encounter her further.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:52 PM
1

it's a ridiculous rejection of biology. There are social constructions associated with gender, girls wear dresses and have long hair and such, but to call all aspects of gender social, like having a penis, then what you have is ridiculous. Long hair, dresses, suits, things like that, engendering them is silly, if you want to wear a skirt, dude, then more power to you, if you want me to deny that you have a Y chromosome, and all of the various neurological, and hormonal realities that come with i…
/r/MensRights14/03/12 09:36 PM
5

Logic is fun!
/r/MensRights14/03/12 08:36 PM
1

Well Hillary Clinton has always given me a laugh. Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 05:11 PM
1

for a long time, and still in some situation nowadays, women triumphing was considered amusing at best. Nowadays women triumphing is considered amusing by feminists in order to preserve the idea that women are oppressed.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 03:01 PM
0

well, in general it'd be better for women and for men if we were all treated equally.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 02:19 PM
-1

she's bringing feminist and post-structuralist philosophy, which both are part of post-modernism.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 04:19 PM
1

There's less room for failure, but there's also less room for success. Sure that puts them at a comfortable middle ground, but some people want to succeed.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 01:46 PM
4

She got off.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 07:10 PM
1

True.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 06:30 PM
2

Nope, the Xenomorphs in the alien franchise are walking penises.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 06:15 PM
1

It's actually a trope known as the Rape-Revenge flick, the most notable of the genre is "I Spit on your Grave" You see, when men kill women, you're meant to be terrified, and understand that the man is pure evil, but when women kill men in horror movies, you're supposed to cheer for her and know that what she's doing is justified.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 06:13 PM
24

Women aren't the most vulnerable members of society. That's the problem, women are seen as the most vulnerable members of society, and therefore, they must be protected, and anything they do is amusing at best. It's pathetic, it's harmful to women, it's harmful to men, it's harmful in general.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 05:37 PM
1

This kind of woman-hatred is increasingly visible in most Western societies, and it tends to be allied with other anti-modern emotions — opposition to same-sex marriage, to non-Christian immigration, to women in the workplace, and even, in some cases, to the advancement of African Americans. As an atheist who loves women, loves modernism, loves the fact that gay people can wed in my country (canada), loves that women have opportunities now that they didn't have before and are starting to be trea…
/r/MensRights11/03/12 03:39 AM
2

I'm not pro-life. Not at aaaaaaaall.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 02:31 AM
2

That's the real problem; the people who should be taken seriously aren't as loud as everyone else, and power is granted by popularity contest. I'm not dismayed, I'm not even surprised. Hell, I'm not even offended, I just know those people just don't know the whole story. Life gets easier when you realize that the majority of people aren't delusional hate filled bile spewers.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 02:25 AM
1

Nope, not excuses. See that, claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Honestly, I stopped trying to educate people when I was 16, it's been a long time since then, I'm not about to start. Let the angry and the passionate bring it to the forefront, when people want to understand, they'll do their own research. You cannot teach the willfully ignorant.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 02:11 AM
1

They are not secondary, they are explanations. People can get angry, I do not deny that. I would not label them bigots offhand, that is not to say that bigots don't exist. And I would not call bigots the flag bearers of the MRM either. The only thing that can be done, by me as an individual, is to continue arguing valid points and not making bigoted comments. I am not responsible for people not looking things up and researching and understanding, in other words, I am not responsible when other p…
/r/MensRights11/03/12 01:59 AM
1

Then you don't see the points I'm making. One point is that perfectly rational people can get angry, they can get angry for perfectly rational reasons. It's not surprising that people can be angry. This does not necessarily make them bigots. When they let their emotions dominate their discourse, that's the problem. Another point is that the overarching discourse of men's rights as a whole is not that we feel like we're victims, it's that we have valid reasoning to point to the fact that we are n…
/r/MensRights11/03/12 01:27 AM
1

"Oh, but feminists do it to!" That is not my argument. I suggest you read my post a few more times.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 01:00 AM
1

I could lie and say that people aren't angry. But people are angry. It's understandable that people are angry. Angry people happen. Anyone that seriously attempts to argue that men are better than women or anything like that get downvoted. No it isn't. Patriarchy, rule of the father, implicitly male; feminist, implicitly female. It's within feminist discourse that having a penis and engaging in intercourse is metaphor for rape, porn is referred to as commercial rape. Hell, it's very common to he…
/r/MensRights11/03/12 12:49 AM
1

People posting here saying such misogynistic rhetoric often get downvoted to oblivion, or banned, or something else. So far I've never seen any support to women belong in the kitchen-style commentary. Have you? So far I've only seen people that just want to make sure the future doesn't look like the past, and doesn't look like the present. It's implicit within the discourse of feminism that men are monstrous demons seeking to oppress their perfect female selves. Laws are written based on this, s…
/r/MensRights10/03/12 11:15 PM
1

Stating intent is not the same as acting on intent. I could state that I want to bake cookies, and then I could slaughter a chicken. Statements don't accomplish anything, real actions do. The worst a statement could do is offend someone.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 10:35 PM
-2

Christ, why advertise that you're female, the fact that you're female is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 04:14 PM
1

Women are attracted to assholes/jerks/general criminal types the same way women are attracted to politicians, or musicians, or several other groups of people. These are groups of people that are celebrated within our culture, who are confident, to a fault, and who, if successful, defy social norm (very big in our society) and reap huge rewards. Genetically motivated hypergamous behaviour. Etc.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 06:25 AM
-32

That's nice, not necessary, but nice.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 06:22 AM
2

Just treat people as you would like to be treated, and call people out on their casual sexism, whether it be directed towards men or women, it's really all you can do as an individual. By the way, whether or not you're female is absolutely irrelevant, it's stuff like that. Extreme emphasis on one gender in some form.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 05:14 AM
1

Rightfully demonizing, would it be right to demonize the men's rights movement, I later said that you are not judged by intention, you are judged by action, has the men's rights movement done anything to warrant demonization? Also, it's/its, yeah I mix those up often.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 12:33 AM
3

and the roots of christianity are based on loving your neighbour and turning the other cheek, as well the roots of objectivism is the goal of having freedom and autonomy for intellectuals in modern society. The roots of something do not reflect upon it's actions, goals, and affect. We are not judged by intention, we are judged by action.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 07:06 PM
4

rightfully demonizing an ideology only harms it's fiercest ideologues. It makes moderates question their assumptions.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 05:54 PM
1

So far, I've done a bit of all three; results are less than satisfactory.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 10:47 PM
5

To be honest, I'd rather be the master of kitchen and cleaning than useless barbarian. Sounds like a pretty sweet gig.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 10:46 PM
17

I don't have the legs for it.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 08:58 AM
0

hi5
/r/MensRights06/03/12 03:14 AM
1

The definition of insanity is trying the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. If it's not going to work, it's not going to work. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 11:38 PM
3

Yet individuals come forth and decry this kind of behavior, including feminists, and their opinions are disregarded via NAFALT. If a feminist came out in opposition to male-centric anti-rape campaigns, would you disregard her on the basis that she isn't the mainstream feminist view? If so, how do you ever expect her view to propagate in the feminist community? Yes, because there's is no true feminists, if a feminist came out in opposition to male-centric anti-rape campaigns, I would applaud her …
/r/MensRights05/03/12 10:54 PM
3

In the idea that we all want equal rights, all people are allies. Trans issues are a part of trans issues, men's issues are part of men's issues. Simple as that. Although I do appreciate your support and open mindedness. I wish you the best.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 07:08 PM
6

It's within the structure of feminist discourse to implicitly paint men as aggressors and oppressors and women as victims and liberators. Men are demonized and women are deified. Now this is far from the truth. Women can be oppressors, so can men, and both can be victims. But the structure of feminist discourse presents and advocates the idea that women have to be protected because they are, intrinsically, good, and men are, intrinsically, bad. Not all feminists think this way, but a large porti…
/r/MensRights05/03/12 07:02 PM
0

Talk to him about it.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 06:50 PM
7

Honestly, Rush is a moron, and I'm glad that something is ending his career, it should've ended years ago.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 06:18 AM
2

Well done Thomas, best of luck to you in the future!
/r/MensRights04/03/12 11:46 PM
11

This is disgusting. I wish you the best.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 06:03 AM
3

I'm so sorry for you sir. This is really very very sad. I wish you the best.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 04:43 AM
3

Very dumb woman, that one.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 04:39 AM
1

Jesus christ.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 05:11 PM
7

We don't have the full story, he's scared and confused, and it could be just an aunt by marriage.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 12:25 AM
5

She's afraid the world is out to get her when, for the most part, it's really not. She's not a feminist, she's schizophrenic. Go see a lawyer so you don't lose your kids in the divorce.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 03:31 PM
1

I would've just posted it in it's own reddit thread, but it's too long.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 03:29 AM
1

according to some news article I saw a while ago. Daily mail, sadly. I haven't seen anywhere else. Interior Design, architecture, these fields are dominated by women. Thanks
/r/MensRights21/02/12 03:29 AM
2

Good point.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 05:11 AM
6

That's terrible.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 06:39 AM
1

link?
/r/MensRights19/02/12 01:09 AM
1

It's a joke being used as a hypothetical example. She has done nothing wrong.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 03:16 PM
5

I have nothing to say. So I upvoted you. Done.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 02:25 AM
1

Well... my girlfriend is a self described feminist; So we've had some arguments on the matter. Although I wouldn't call myself a MRA as I would call myself an Egalitarian: I've been very careful about what I say around her. Part of the problem I've had is that she gets very impassioned by feministic arguments and is very emotional on the issues, so I have to be gentle in talking to her about these things. Things that affect both men and women and is harmful to both. She was raised by a single da…
/r/MensRights14/02/12 02:12 AM
1

Personally, as a man who enjoys beer, whiskey, and red wine. Ideas about what being a man constitutes and what being a woman constitute are what's wrong with our culture, and that to be forced to think you should conform with one faulty cultural expectation and that you're superior for it than conforming to the contrary expectation. They're both wrong. There's nothing wrong with eating a steak, while drinking whiskey and commenting on the finer points of gentlemanly affairs, like the stock marke…
/r/MensRights10/02/12 01:09 AM
3

The vast majority of all great artists have been male, partially from sexism and the idea that art is only for men.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 01:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter