TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Meetchel Archive

View 1 posts and 484 comments by Meetchel on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Question for RedPillMeetchel/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 09:18 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Do you think, in general, men are more or less disgusted by pics of random tits than women are by pics of random dicks?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 04:38 AM
1

That's true! Unfortunately, because you refuse to provide a source, we can't confirm or deny whether 40% of Americans is greater or less than the number of people that believe your claim. The one thing I think I can confidently claim without a source; well over 40% of the world knows this statement is horseshit: It’s become lore - if sufficient numbers of people believe it to be true, then it becomes the truth
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 09:13 PM
3

Roughly 40% of Americans. Forty percent of U.S. adults ascribe to a strictly creationist view of human origins, believing that God created them in their present form within roughly the past 10,000 years. 40% of Americans Believe in Creationism (Gallup, July 2019) Above is a source to a claim. It's common to provide sources to claims so that people know you're not full of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 09:02 PM
7

It’s become lore - if sufficient numbers of people believe it to be true, then it becomes the truth More people believe that the world is less than 10,000 years old than believe your statement. Based on your logic, it is a proven fact that the world is less than 10,000 years old because enough people believe it to be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 08:34 PM
3

Got it. And how exactly is your claim “proven fact”? Are you mistaking Okcupid studies for sociological peer reviewed research?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 08:26 PM
2

It’s a proven fact that 80% of women are only interested in the top 20% of men I’d love to see your proof of this. How do you square this mathematically with the fact that ~50% of adults marrying?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 07:56 PM
4

Married men without children may still have familial responsibilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 07:50 PM
7

I don’t want government mandated DNA tests in my life. What would they do if I refuse? Strap me down in a holding cell to get a cheek swab?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 02:06 PM
–

Outside of work related stuff, my landlord, and one or two relatives, I have no contacts in my phone. Everyone I know has friends. Not having any friends isn’t typical.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 10:39 PM
3

Mental health issues are not gender specific - everyone would benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 05:26 AM
9

We can also make access to mental health easier and less stigmatized.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 06:40 PM
4

People, and specially women, tend to overestimate how much sex I actually get. The fact is that I'm getting more than these women, and specially more than these men. I think you need to reword this- it makes no sense. The women that think you get laid a lot get laid less than you? And what men?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/22 07:22 AM
4

Given how polarized we are, I’d be shocked if it wasn’t bimodal. And on the same token, your experience and mine are going to be fundamentally different if we live in drastically different societies e.g. rural America vs urban America.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/22 07:19 AM
2

I’m a middle-aged 6’4” and 225 lbs. with a big frame and a bit of muscle, slightly overweight. I wear XL shirts with no issue. None of the guys in these pics have a problem wearing XL shirts because they’re too tight.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 05:36 AM
6

So 80% of women are holding out for 1% of men? Wouldn’t that directly conflict with the fact that less than 80% of women are single? Shouldn’t that mean 79% are single? And where did the 19% of men go between the top 1% and bottom 80%? I think you need to think about the math more before you start throwing out numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 05:30 AM
1

I wasn't really considering the 35+ dudes that were going after 18-25 women - that's a pretty big age divide (especially considering <21). But, in general, there's a huge chasm in long-term relationship eligibility for many people when comparing poverty-level income to average-level income.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 08:05 PM
15

Agreed with your general sentiment - shitty men will always have a tougher time. Generally though (but of course not always), 35 year olds make much more money than 18-25 year olds.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 04:03 PM
5

How common do you think this issue is? 128 women just competed in the U.S. Open and exactly zero of them were born male.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 04:52 PM
3

Women aren’t a monolith.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 04:48 PM
4

Jesus, what is with all of you with “replacement” phobias? Trans women (not sure why you put it in quotes) don’t have an ulterior motive to replace all cis women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 04:47 PM
2

Oh. I’m an idiot. Apologies. Especially for my tone. Embarrassing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 02:53 AM
2

causing the average man to fly into a permanent, jealous rage This is just not true for most men on the planet. I suspect you’re either stuck in this specific internet subculture focused on such things or you’re very young. Never mind, my reading comprehension is broken tonight.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 01:55 AM
13

There are also way more 65+ women then men; roughly 6 million more.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 03:10 PM
2

So maybe I'm out of touch and don't understand how dating for people in their early to mid 20s works. Maybe it's changed radically since I was in my early to mid 20s. Has it? I for real don't know. I don't think it has. I'm 43, but 20-25 years ago I was as angsty as the younger users on this sub. With age, everything in the dating world got easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 05:08 PM
4

Meanwhile, men are happier marrying virgin's, immigrants...etc Your problem is that you’re stuck in this weird incel world where the basic premises of your arguments are so flawed they can’t be used to come to a legitimate conclusion. If you want to reduce the likelihood of divorce you need to wait longer and settle into your adult self before looking for a lifetime mate. Teenage angst eventually subsides.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 02:53 AM
5

Your assertion is that college girls don’t date college boys? It’s been awhile since I was in college, but that was certainly not the case when I was there.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 02:52 AM
14

Yep. I spent my 20s and 30s mostly single in NYC and it was absolutely fantastic. There was something near a million more straight single women than straight single men. Girls complained about this all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 03:59 AM
1

It's absolutely absurd to me that you think this. Go to a kid's soccer game and tell me the dads there are all stunningly attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 02:59 AM
0

If the father had legal right to deny an abortion to his partner, he had better be legally liable if she's one of the many women in the US that die during pregnancy or labor every year.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 06:01 PM
8

The left has gone too far. Second and third trimester abortions were starting to be common and acceptable. This is absurd and patently false. ~90% of abortions are, and have been for quite awhile, completed in the first trimester and the general trend has been declining numbers of abortions in all trimesters. Care to provide a source?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 06:00 PM
1

I'd be interested on this - I would have assumed wealth was the #1 factor.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 08:42 PM
6

I sympathize with her for sure and social anxiety can be massively debilitating, but I wouldn't be able to have a relationship with someone that has it this bad. I consider that part of life competency.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 10:35 PM
3

50% of marriages end in divorce, and women initiate 90% of divorces. That's simply not true if you're talking about the general population.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 05:04 PM
5

I lied about being a virgin my first time (I was 20 and super insecure about it) and it caused a whole host of problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:17 PM
1

I don't think anyone is going to be taking advice from someone that refers to women as "females".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 10:42 PM
0

Yep. I do not trust the government having such intimate information about myself. It seems weird to me that everyone here is more trusting of the government than their own spouses.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 10:38 PM
1

I understand where you're coming from and support legislation related to it, I just don't think it'll happen. It won't happen because it's so clearly unconstitutional to have government mandated DNA testing. I would flip my absolute shit if the government demanded I give DNA because I had the audacity to have a kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 10:35 PM
1

I think that having paternity testing mandated at birth before the father signs the birth certificate would mitigate this. The government mandating DNA testing doesn't seem too constitutional to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 10:34 PM
0

I wasn’t comparing my experience in relation to a woman’s experience, I was comparing my experience as a young man to one a bit older. Still an anecdote, but this is true for virtually all of my male friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 02:32 AM
5

This isn't true at all. I was fit as fuck at 25 and had relative trouble dating, but 30-40 (despite having gained weight and lost a ton of muscle) it was massively easier. As you age a bit you become more confident in yourself in all aspects, your salary likely increases quite a bit thus your standard of living is likely way better than when you were younger, you understand much more what you want out of a relationship, and the age range of women interested in you opens up massively.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 10:49 PM
1

I understand that but both he and you thought he was. If who you call father found out tomorrow that you weren’t his biological son, would he murder you?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/22 09:54 PM
1

I bet some of the men who think it’s justified to kill the mother are parents though. Fully agreed and while it’s very obviously not right or acceptable (our society isn’t ISIS) I get the fear. My issue is all of the anger past that. I’m also annoyed that this PPD type discussion (which I think was interesting on its face) is becoming so heavily militant.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/22 01:54 AM
1

There is a massive number of shitty parents, but there’s still a chasm between being a shitty parent and being willing to admit you’d kill innocent children in a Reddit thread about a hypothetical situation they’re not currently facing. I think admitting this is a legitimately sociopathic act (at least in my non-professional opinion).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 11:43 PM
0

I understand (if don’t condone, obviously) the crime of passion directed at the wife, but I’m a parent. I cannot in any way comprehend or understand the idea of murdering my son in any situation including this one. Could you imagine your father doing the same to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 11:21 PM
0

Fully agreed. I'm certain that no one on that side of the debate is a parent.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 10:12 PM
1

I fully understand the rage, but we're talking about it as a hypothetical so our responses don't need to be rage-filled. I still stand by my suggestion that anyone justifying the murder of innocent children is a sociopath.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 10:11 PM
0

If I found out my son wasn't mine, I would be devastated, and obviously my wife and I would be done. But my son is still my son; he's still my greatest achievement, and in this hypothetical scenario he would be completely blindsided himself. I can't even fathom abandoning him because of something he did not do. I suspect if you were a father you'd understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 10:10 PM
2

You justified it at the very least twice. Justification #1 (where you stated it's "far more evil" what the hypothetical mother did than murdering innocent children): An evil woman using your resources for years, while.you are rising another man's DNA is far more evil. Justification #2 (in response to "Than killing children that you raised, that believed you were their father?"): Isn't abortion OK? I get that it's an emotional concept to you, but if you were a father you would understand that ima…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 09:02 PM
5

Did the children you’re justifying murdering consent to their death? Murdering children in response to being cheated on is not what a sane person would defend.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 08:51 PM
2

It is a deep lie, but if you're a parent and think the idea of literally murdering the innocent children you spent years protecting and loving is acceptable in the case you found out they, by no fault or knowledge of their own, were products of their mother's lie, you probably should not be a parent. I would be shocked if there's a single parent in here suggesting this is understandable.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 08:44 PM
4

Murdering the innocent children you raised because of someone else's fault is worse than aborting a fetus. This isn't arguable. Not even by the most staunchly pro-life activists. Also note that pro-life activists use adoption as their primary solution, which by definition is raising the product of another couple's DNA.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 08:35 PM
0

Who the fuck is they? Are you suggesting the kids know they're deceiving you as soon as they're birthed? Your wife, and your wife alone, caused this. Don't go blaming innocent children.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 08:30 PM
-2

I think the problem is that at this point you have teenage children you raised and presumably love very much who did nothing wrong; they didn't cheat on you, or change over night just because you learned your wife was awful. If you're a parent, you would realize how fucking much of your entire being has gone into protecting and nurturing them. That doesn't just go away.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 08:29 PM
-2

What did the kids do to deserve death? If you fathered them from birth to teenage years, you're very imprinted on each other and I suspect you wouldn't blame them for the issue (and you certainly wouldn't murder them, at least I hope). People can love their adopted kids just as much as their biological kids. It's pretty insane to me to justify murder of the kids you raised in virtually any circumstance. If you have kids, I think you'd understand this.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 08:23 PM
7

I have the exact same problem with men declaring that their being "friend-zoned" is in any way a fault of others.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/22 04:51 AM
2

I understand, but that isn’t what I was discussing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/22 07:23 PM
2

There is a reason why parents traditionally tried to get their daughter to marry when she had her highest SMV. Are you sure the reason parents hurried their daughters out of the house wasn't that prior to being allowed by society to have careers they were a financial drain on the parents? That's certainly what got my mother's parents to pressure her to be married at 19.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/22 06:51 PM
9

Pedant here! It actually is mathematically possible. 8*4.5 + 2*10 averages out to above average. Either way, this post assumes the only thing that matters to any woman is physical attractiveness (not whether she's in a relationship, she dislikes the dude's personality, she thinks they have different styles or lifestyles, she's having a bad day, she doesn't like being approached in public, etc). There are a multitude of reasons that men are rejected that have nothing to do with their relative att…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 12:05 AM
1

My dad had sugar pops every morning in the 50s. Sugar was in fucking everything back then. It’s only known health detriment was “it’ll rot your teeth”.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 02:08 PM
10

You're entirely correct that lack of activity is a major issue in our society, but our parent's generation also drove to work and ate shit food. EDIT: just realized I should probably specify "our parent's generation" as mine was likely most people on this thread's "grandparent's generation". My parents were born in the mid-40s and never ate healthy food. Neither were overweight, but they had other issues specifically linked to lack of nutrition.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 01:05 AM
7

In my experience, gyms weren't nearly as mainstream as they are today, but tons of people had benches etc. in their garages. I started lifting with my dad in the late 80s and I wasn't alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 01:02 AM
1

Probably less so due to PED testing at the very least. I think there are legitimate points in this thread, but the dates are shifted way too recent (likely by young people with an incorrect understanding). My father got a bench in the 60s when lifting weights was relatively less common, but by the time I was a teen in the early 90s lifting weights was incredibly common. Gyms were definitely less popular even in the early 90s (at least anecdotally), but having a section of the garage carved out f…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 01:01 AM
3

Still no backup to your claim. You said: More often than you realize it is not by his choice. I've been through it. The statistics don't lie. What statistics? Got a link to that study?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 01:28 PM
6

So it’s patently false the only support of your views is your personal anecdotes and a clearly partisan group of forums? At least you’re honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 02:14 AM
14

I'm absolutely certain it happens, and likely quite often, but stating that most single mothers are the issue (even more so given you stated that "the statistics don't lie") requires a source to be believed. What statistics are you referencing? I'm not saying you're wrong, but until actual values are presented people are going to meet these claims with warranted skepticism.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 01:40 AM
1

You’re espousing patently false narratives and sourcing yourself. Sourcing provable claims is a prerequisite for communication and you have failed to do this. Where’s your source that women controlled humanity prior to agriculture?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 09:30 PM
1

I figured after the “hundreds of hours” of study (which I read as “a couple YouTube videos”) that /u/dietwindows would have at least one questionable link he could provide, but it seems you’re right.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 08:38 PM
4

The invention of agriculture (sort of) subjugated women for a few millenia, (a relatively small time frame in the scope of human existance) The invention of agriculture happened well prior to the beginning of human history. Human existence is substantially longer, but I'm not sure what source material you're considering when you say so definitively that prehistory was dominated by women (especially before agriculture).
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:53 PM
1

Saudi Arabia. I’ve been a bunch of times, it’s certainly right up your alley. There aren’t many other options.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 07:40 PM
1

It really is pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 07:35 PM
1

Have fun in KSA!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 07:35 PM
1

Currently we have too many workers and not enough jobs which is one of the things leading to lower wages so I am going to guess pretty well. We’re literally in a worker shortage right now, probably the worst in our history, and wages are skyrocketing because of this. Face it, you just need to grow up and face reality. We’re not going to imprison 150 million women because you haven’t been gifted a beautiful woman by the govt.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 07:19 PM
1

I think if I have a bachelors in the subject and years of experience I should get the job in that subject. If I can't get that chances are their is something wrong with employers not the person looking for a job There doesn’t have to be anything wrong with either the employer for going with another candidate who they felt was a better fit (who also had the relevant required experience, perhaps even more than you) or you for being passed over for the job. You can’t just bitch that the world owes …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 07:14 PM
1

Do you think you’re owed any job you want? You’re not. Just like you’re not owed a hot wife. That’s not how the world works, and if you keep thinking it is you’re going to continue to be disappointed. Both statements sound correct. Neither prospective employers or prospective dating interests owe you a fucking thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 06:59 PM
2

I scheduled a vasectomy already.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 05:53 PM
1

Personally I think the easiest solution if social engineering and shaming women once again because we know that was effective in the past and requires less changes than most other solutions. If a woman is over 35 and unmarried she should be viewed as a massive failure on the level of a drug addict and people should treat her that way. A woman who refuses to settle should be made fun of and thought of as someone who is not someone you want to be around. etcetera. Their are other solutions my pers…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 07:38 AM
7

Why does she want to birth a child she cannot care for? The majority of US states are about to not have this option at all. Some already effectively do. They both had a choice to have sex and accept the potential responsibility. We all pay for the mistake, and that's unfair. Curious though - is your argument that the man should be able to force abortion on a woman he fucked and impregnated? And what about when abortion is illegal in a couple months?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 07:23 AM
0

So you're all for incentivizing adoption rather than biological parents keeping and financially supporting their kids? Either way, society is paying. I'm confused how this is a solution to the problem. I don't see why the biological parents, if capable, shouldn't be shouldering the burden.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 07:17 AM
1

You're equating "price gouging" with not fucking you enough. Is your answer that the government step in because you aren't getting laid? Which women should we force to fuck you? I don't see a solution in all of your bitching, only an identification of things you see as problems with society (but not yourself).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 07:15 AM
1

I'm pretty sure I could take a stab.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 07:11 AM
0

Unless you're advocating for the euthanization of that kid (fucking insane), you and I are raising that kid financially. How is that more fair than the biological parents doing so?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 07:09 AM
8

I'm entirely for protection of the less fortunate, but why should I pay for a wealthy dude's kid instead of either my own or a kid that's actually poor with no other option?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 07:08 AM
-1

You're mixing two things up. A woman has the right to "abandon" a child (the preferred method of conservatives via adoption instead of abortion), but you're vilifying it here. If men opt out but the women decides to keep it, if our laws didn't require child support you and I are paying for that child instead of the father. Is that what you suggest is fair?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 06:59 AM
2

So if the relatively destitute mother keeps the kid but the father is absolved, I have to pay for the kid instead through my tax dollars. Why is it my responsibility more than the man who impregnated her? I think can all agree the kid needs financial support (I hope), but I don't need the undue burden of providing for a kid I didn't father where not required.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 06:54 AM
-2

Misogynists get women far less often than they otherwise would.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 06:48 AM
1

You shouldn't take your cues on human social interactions by which random subreddits have been banned.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 06:47 AM
-4

Oh come the fuck on. Getting fit and becoming financially sound is the entirety of red pill advice and it does work to attract women, but it didn't take a specialized group to explain. People like successful, attractive people. Shocking. It's entirely unnecessary. Everyone my age figured this shit out before the Matrix.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 06:44 AM
3

I'm confused... are you arguing for a time when the only option for women was to attach themselves to a man? "Hooray, equality" certainly sounds like that. When I was a kid in the 80s, spousal rape was legal. Is that a metric we want to return to?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 06:41 AM
4

Fully agreed with your answer, but I think you're undervaluing the social skills component you mentioned. Becoming a person legitimately interested in something will outdo almost any other improvement you could make. Being excited in even the most mundane things is incredibly sexy to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 06:36 AM
3

Most guys aren't struggling with women. That's the honest answer. What will help them a ton if they're struggling is to work on themselves (physically, emotionally, etc.) and if the pool of available women is low, moving to where that's not an issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 06:34 AM
3

It very much depends on where you live. In my youth in NYC (and I'm not that old), 20-40 was relatively low.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 06:32 AM
7

Mostly agreed, but I think you're going even too far regarding judgement of behavior. Married with kids now, but I've dated a lot, and whether a girl sleeps with me on the first night or not is literally irrelevant to my feelings about her. The only thing I really detest is the games you allude to (which literally 100% of the time ended with the first date for me). If you connect with someone and things feel right (your general sentiment), go with it, regardless of gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 06:21 AM
1

Wild but true. There are not very many 44 year old virgins in the wild.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 06:17 AM
0

The market chooses who is a 3 and who is an 8. If an item is worth $100 to enough people, it's not up to you to say it's not worth $100. We live in a society where each individual has the right to choose what they want, as much as you complain about the relative values. I think the solution to you is to make yourself worth the proverbial $100, and I suspect based on this conversation you should start with your outlook on life and other people. Therapy did a fucking ton for me in this regard 20+ …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 06:13 AM
1

I don't think a lot of the previous ways we forced women to stop being so greedy are viable anymore, but some are, and we could come up with new ones because this many people especially young men being single is a recipe for disaster from multiple angles demographics with not enough replacement people to support the economy and retirement systems, increased violence, men dropping out of society and lots of others. I think this statement is the crux of your issue. You legitimately consider the re…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 06:08 AM
2

1/3rd of people being unemployed for a year is no one's fault but theirs.That doesn't sound very good does it? So why do you think it is okay for men to be dealing with this but if it was jobs you would be up in arms. That's actually, weirdly, a fair point. I'm effectively using a capitalistic approach to my explanations of dating, and we do expect the govt to help non-capitalistically with unemployment as your example shows, so I get where you're coming from here. That being said, relationships…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 02:22 AM
-1

then something is deeply wrong with women Women do not owe you sex. This conclusion is really fucking gross . 1/3 of young men being celibate for a year is no one’s fault but theirs. I don’t get why you immediately jump to blame others for your failures. More than 1/3 of American men (actually more than 40%) aged 20-39 are obese.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 11:18 PM
1

I'm betting the ones whining on here are too young to have learned about sampling bias in school. I'm very happy when I was an angsty teen virgin that there wasn't an internet for me to document my bitching and moaning forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 11:07 PM
6

But between 12-14 percent of adults aged 20-24 have never had sex. This number drops to around five percent for adults aged 25-29, and by age 44, only around 0.3 percent of adults report never having had the type of sex that could end in somebody getting pregnant. According to this study, 3 in 1000 adults are virgins over 44 years of age, and I suspect a third of them are on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 11:03 PM
-1

You literally read that as "1/3 have no sex in a year" and thus "2/3 have sex exactly once a year"?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 11:00 PM
6

Is this really a question? Him: can I choke you when we fuck? Her: yes Him: *chokes her* Consent Him: can I choke you when we fuck? Her: no Him: *chokes her* No consent
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 10:14 PM
1

Because they deserve to be able to control what happens with their own body. Should this little girl be forced to carry her rapist family member's baby to term? My 11-Year-Old Patient Was Pregnant. Here's What I Want You To Know About Being 'Pro-Life.'
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 01:42 AM
0

/u/Frosty-Gate-8094 said: Casual sex was fairly common even before birth control and abortions were available. They became 'legal' much later. Abortions have been available for thousands of years. The ancient Greeks & Romans performed legal abortions. It was legal in the US until the latter part of the 19th century. It's not a new phenomenon. You have an incorrect grasp of history if you think otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 01:22 AM
2

You need to read different sources if that's the narrative you're seeing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 01:20 AM
4

I think it really depends on where you live. Some random town in the midwest? 100 is probably very unlikely. Live in NYC? I know very few men in NYC that were single & drunk for any length of time that don't have 100 or so hookups.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 03:58 PM
1

Most of my male friends have higher than 50 partners in their life. Regardless, the point they're making is one about a fictitious world in which men have all of the control, but it seems you're completely missing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 07:52 PM
0

Your math still doesn’t add up. All women are coupled up but only half of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 06:08 PM
1

So if average men get "garbage" (ugh) women, and attractive men get average women, does that mean all of the most attractive women are all single? Your math doesn't add up. I suspect the men that think they're average are not in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 05:37 PM
4

Don't forget grunge and space needles!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 10:30 PM
3

It happened in my upper-middle class southern CA suburb, it happened to my wife around age 12 in Moscow, and it happened to almost all of my female friends at similar ages all over the US. A big city certainly would provide more opportunity for this, but it is in no way specific to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 10:30 PM
15

How is it irrelevant when your entire argument can be boiled down to "women owe me sex because I'm attractive"?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/22 04:21 PM
3

Almost all of my male friends were slutty as hell between 25-35 or so before settling down, and we run the gamut in terms of physical attractiveness. You're either young (<25) or don't live in a city if you believe average men don't get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 12:05 AM
12

A majority of my friends have kids at this point in my life (I'm in my 40s), but literally none wanted kids or had kids before 30.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 11:44 PM
1

When I was in school/college/university I was actively dating but now I'm 29 I'm struggling with being able to get in situations with lots of available women. I had exactly the opposite problem. I slept with a grand total of 1 woman by college graduation @ 23 years old (not for a lack of trying), and ~20 years later I've been with over 100 (thanks in large part to the normalization of online dating and otherwise to way too much alcohol). Granted, the majority of those were in two very slutty cit…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/21 07:20 PM
1

you're dancing around with definitions to avoid the fact that women do say they prefer nice (synonymous in context with kind/empathetic btw) men but we all know the drug dealer gangbanger is getting it more than the charity worker. This comment is either a parody account or full-on /r/niceguys in the flesh.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 03:52 PM
15

No what you are describing is self respect not possession. Feminists have brainwashed you Wait, self respect is dumping a girl and then being upset she moved on with her life?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 03:21 PM
4

I’m in my 40s and when I was in HS Sadie Hawkins dances were considered a relic of history. Is that actually a thing anywhere in the 21st century?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 03:49 AM
17

Most women feel uncomfortable going on a date with a man they have zero interest in What men feel comfortable going on a date with a woman they have zero interest in?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 03:46 AM
2

In general you’re obviously right, but as you get older these ratios do start to swing toward equality somewhat.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 03:37 AM
2

I think it really depends on the financial capability of each person. I’ve dated women wealthier than me and they generally pay for more than I do and I’ve dated women less well off than me and I generally pay for them. For someone making $13/hour, half of a $100 date is a lot, but for someone making $400k it’s nothing. In general it’s more of an economics question to me. I’ve been single as an adult for roughly half of the last 25 years and have never had an issue either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 03:19 AM
3

That was my thought. I was in my mid-20s fifteen years ago and everyone I knew fucked like bunnies back then.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 06:46 PM
2

$50 isn't a crazy small number to spend on a booze-less dinner (it'd typically be a bit more the places I've lived but still), but I'd wager most of us have a few drinks with dinner on a date almost always bumping it up over $100 at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/20 02:27 PM
3

Everything changes from the perspective of age for men at least in my experience. I lost my virginity in my early 20s (my last year of college), but once I was in my 30s it just became... so, so much easier, even despite losing a great body.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/20 01:08 AM
2

If the mistakes result in a felony conviction, they can fuck up a man's life as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/20 01:18 AM
2

Darwin's theories of evolution are fundamentally irrelevant once a species gets to the point where any member can reproduce freely without any real barrier. Human beings are no longer evolving (in the classical sense).
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 05:18 PM
2

But the graph in the OP literally says it’s using adjusted values which means wages have gone up even when taking into account inflation. Housing has gone up insanely since then, as has college and health care, but those are not what inflation is based on. People made less on average in 1975 than they do today (as OP showed accidentally in his links).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 05:17 AM
3

Average salary back then was $8k, not $23.5k. $23.5k is the adjusted value (in 2017 dollars).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 04:50 AM
5

They're missing the fact that the $23.5k value is adjusted for inflation.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 04:36 AM
4

That's not true at all. The $23.5k listed in OP is ADJUSTED dollars (which means it accounts for inflation in order to accurately compare). Average salary in 1975 was about $8k.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 04:33 AM
2

On your graph, it literally says adjusted dollars which means inflation is already taken into account. Average salary in 1975 was about $8k. So many people in this thread are missing this.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 04:32 AM
6

I have the exact opposite experience. I find that high ranking women tend to be very quick to be assertive in meetings - more than many (most?) men at high levels. It has literally never become anything close to a physical altercation though. For the record, I've split my time about evenly between mechanical engineering offices (not programmers) and urban construction sites.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 05:23 PM
5

When you talk shit behind a guy's back in a male-dominated office, one wrong move and you might get your ass kicked I've been working in male-dominated offices for over 25 years and I have literally never seen or heard of a physical altercation happening at work or between coworkers. Where are you working that you feel constantly under physical threat?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 04:41 PM
1

You feel this is more of an issue than I do, but if you (not you literally, but hypothetically assuming you were a congressman) were going to propose a law it should be both financially justified and absolutely cannot be unconstitutional. In any event, whatever solution you can propose must not infringe on anyone's rights; if it doesn't, no problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 04:39 AM
1

You’re still not answering to me how i can guarantee the govt won’t misuse that data nor are you telling me how it’s being funded. You keep going back to the principle issue without offering answers to the implementation. Without an understanding of how you can solve the issue and also guarantee my rights as a citizen there is no acceptance.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 04:08 AM
3

Your statements are absolutely and fundamentally not conservative; you're calling on further government control and mandatory collection of our human data (literally the most basic data that makes us who we are). But ignoring that (and the constitiution), having an opt-out option still means that "sheepish" men will be manipulated by women (so the problem isn't solved) in that they will still pressure these men to not take the test (not unlike today), legal paternity tests in the US are already …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 03:29 AM
3

Your trust in the government is greater than mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 03:18 AM
2

They do use PCR testing (same process used by DNA sites like 23andme), but that’s irrelevant. It allows the government to own my information. Opt-in is totally different, but if the government came in and mandated all citizens give their DNA do you think people would accept that?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 03:12 AM
0

Fair point and I probably shouldn’t have led with the financials. I still will not let the government take my DNA or my kids’ DNA without my consent. The idea of mandatory DNA collection by the US government of American citizens is insane and anyone that has an inkling of this needs to be voted out immediately.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 03:06 AM
3

Welfare is not gender dependent so that argument holds no weight (or even negative weight because child support lessens the expense of the welfare system). Tests that are legally viable do not cost $100, the bottom limit is $300 and that’s very low (anything that requires a health professional is well overmore than $100, and your CVS kit does not hold legal weight); the average is $400. Youre trying to protect “sheepish” men at the expense of the rights of all Americans. I do not want my DNA or …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 02:59 AM
3

Why not be an opt-in right? The government doesn’t have a great history with opt-out anything. Also to be clear, the parents are paying, correct? Nothing like this can be opt-out and require payment by the government. If the father feels sheepish about bringing this up, why is that on the government to support his inadequacies?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 02:43 AM
3

Fathers have the right to choose to test paternity; I completely agree with that. I'm entirely arguing with the mandatory part of the statement. I don't need the government mandating this to me. If your argument that paternity should be accessible and legal... aren't we already there? What law in the US says we aren't eligible for a paternity test? If there isn't one... what are you really arguing?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 02:32 AM
1

Nope, but drug testing for an employer or requiring vaccinations for a public school (both not mandatory) is not the government straight-jacketing me or my children down to administer the test to steal my DNA if I refuse; I'm either fired or not offered the job, or I home school. Mandatory means something much different when it comes from a private employer or an optional school system than it does from the government.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 02:26 AM
1

This isn't a court of law. You don't get to decide what comments or ideas "count" (especially the response to ones made 58 minutes ago).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 02:18 AM
6

IF you want to be on a birth certificate, you'd have to prove the biological link or prove the adoption link to do so. Father of two here; it would be unimaginable that the government would require a DNA test for me to be on my own children's birth certificate. I don't even understand this; how is this not fundamentally an infringement of my 4th amendment rights? The same government that requires drivers of commercial motor vehicle to produce a medical certificate in order to be able to obtain a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 02:16 AM
2

it’s interesting that you feel that justice for some men isn’t a worthy cause. Looks like I’m not the only one making assumptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 02:07 AM
1

I’m a man, a father, and I pay child support. I understand the problem. I just don’t have any clue how we get past the “government mandate for DNA” without the idea that the information will end up in the hands of government - you obviously trust it a hell of a lot more than I do. Regardless, mandating DNA testing is so obviously anti-4th amendment that it’ll never happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 01:31 AM
2

Good, I’m glad you agree. The tenor of the post to me screams government overreach and the comments in the thread largely ignore it which worries me. It’s mostly bickering over the significance of the problem without recognizing that the solution offered in the OP (mandatory DNA testing by the government for every child & father without due process) would create such a significantly larger problem than its attempting to solve.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 01:24 AM
2

This thread is about mandating the test. The government cannot mandate something like this that costs what is to some people a significant price ($300 to $500 per test). Additionally, the government requiring the DNA submission of every parent & child is, quite honestly, insane. This is not 1984.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 12:36 AM
1

It would cost roughly $1 to $2 billion per year, but the concerns are not mainly financial. All parents and children born after the law was enacted would be mandated to give their DNA to the government. We're quickly approaching 1984 levels of government overreach with something like this; there is no fucking way I'm letting the US government mandate that every one of its citizens provide DNA samples without due process (which is clearly unconstitutional). If you think that level of government c…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 12:30 AM
2

And $500... and worse than that - the government mandated me to give my DNA to them without due process or having committed a crime. I don't get how the absolute trust in the government is so rampant in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 12:21 AM
7

I'm a man. There's no fucking way I'm voluntarily giving my DNA to the government for any reason whatsoever. Why do you think providing this is an acceptable recourse? The government having DNA information on all its citizens (which your idea would allow) would be overreach beyond anything I can even fathom.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 12:17 AM
3

It's more like $1,500 for prenatal testing. You should also understand that the CVS test that may cost $49 doesn't work in a court of law; a legally binding test administered by medical professionals costs somewhere in the neighborhood of $300 to $500.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 12:14 AM
1

Just a one minute swab and $300 to $500 that someone has to pay.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 12:13 AM
4

Assuming you're talking about the US... name one.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 12:12 AM
7

In what fucking world would government mandated genetic testing of all children not be unconstitutional? That's straight out of 1984/Gattaca; we don't even require fucking vaccinations.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 12:10 AM
6

In the US no consent is required. Not sure about other nations.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 12:09 AM
3

I don’t think they should be mandated or paid for by anyone. I simply think all men should take these tests and stop being fucking retards. Whether it's the man, the mother, the government, the insurance companies... someone has to pay for the tests; they may be free in your magical little world but they are not in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 12:05 AM
6

Nope - it isn't the kid's fault that the parents weren't responsible. I pay child support, and it's well less than what I actually spend on my kid outside of child's support. It's not insignificant by any measure but it's my fucking child we're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 12:00 AM
5

Insurance is not going to pay for anything not medically necessary. This would absolutely and fundamentally be a government expense. If the government inexplicably required insurance to pay, insurance rates would go up such that it would end up being an expense on the taxpayers regardless, just in a more roundabout way. We're talking about a cost to the government on the order of $1 to $2 billion per year.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 11:56 PM
7

It's the exact same thing. Except the dude in this scenario doesn't go through the traumatic and risky experience of pregnancy, labor, and delivery.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 11:53 PM
4

Ok then, we get to another question; who would pay for this? It would end up costing somewhere in the neighborhood of $8 to $12 per year per taxpayer, or $400 to $600 per taxpayer (in today's dollars obviously) on average.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 11:09 PM
0

No, just no. This would be a ridiculous waste of resources - there are roughly 3.8 million births a year in the US. At $300 per test (which is the low end), that's over a billion dollars a year. https://dnacenter.com/blog/how-much-does-a-paternity-test-cost/ A home DNA paternity test (for personal knowledge and peace of mind only) costs $130 to $200. A legal DNA paternity test (with court-admissible results) for child support, child visitation, and immigration, typically costs $300 to $500, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 11:04 PM
3

This is just getting really silly, but if it works for you and your partner than no harm. It's a long way from being a standard conversation. I can't imagine how this conversation would ever come up; it's just a really weird thing to ask someone early in a relationship. I'm a dude, but if there were an equivalent and someone asked me that early on in the relationship a thousand red flags would shoot out.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 10:46 PM
1

That's much better and more interesting than just stating the hypothesis - I think that has merit. Obviously there are going to be outliers (in this specific case France), but in general I think with that data making the connection is fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/20 08:54 PM
1

Evidence that men are on average stronger than women is easy to obtain. The evidence you suggested regarding Tinder proportional usages in prostitution-outlawed nations (while not a study) would definitely further your argument past his anecdotal one but you didn’t present it until now (well, at least you didn’t present any evidence - you didn’t source it but I believe it’s likely legit when stated that way).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/20 08:24 PM
7

Aren't you the one making the claim, thus the one that should be providing backup for your hypothesis (or at the very least not shitting on their anecdotes)? It seems that an anecdote from a single person's personal experience generally trumps considerations from your home in the absence of a study.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/20 02:59 PM
1

The fact that you're not hearing about it irl only says people are listening when they're told not to talk about these things with the general public. The reason we don't hear about it irl is because 99+% of people don't care at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/20 06:17 PM
5

The first one makes me especially sad, I hate to think of all the women in the past that hated kids but couldn't voice their opinion without backlash and were forced into having them anyway My grandmother was like this and left my dad and his 4 siblings in the '50s when my dad was 9.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 01:53 AM
0

The entire concept of knowing what will happen once we achieve AGI (which it seems like you're describing when you say AI) is virtually impossible; this is why it's dubbed the singularity, and whether or not a minority of men get laid or not will possibly be the least of society's concerns at that point.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/20 08:24 PM
2

This is such a weird comment. You think that more than half of straight adult men in the US are virgins?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 09:54 PM
3

BP isn’t trying to solve any problems; it exists to mock TRP. Of course it doesn’t have an “actionable plan.”
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/19 06:37 AM
7

It doesn’t mean that it does either. Neither of us have brought any actual study on the subject.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 05:58 AM
16

I've been to a lot of bars at last call on many many nights over more than two decades and have literally never seen a sexual accusation of sexual misconduct for chatting with a girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 04:59 AM
1

It’s necessary to date girls that don’t fuck you? That makes no sense- I must be misunderstanding you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/19 04:42 PM
1

What? You only commit to girls that don't fuck you?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/19 03:56 PM
6

A few years back I dated a hot 22 year old and it was one of the most excruciating things I've ever done. She was so insanely passive and awkward about everything due to lack of life experience in just about every way. I also felt a little gross. 7 years younger than that? No fucking way.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 02:50 PM
3

In my opinion the impact of contracting HIV is greater than the impact of raising a child that isn't yours in my opinion, yet I still don't wear a condom when I fuck my wife. If I'm willing to trust her fidelity with my life, why wouldn't I be willing to trust her about paternity? Have you ever had sex without a condom?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 07:48 AM
1

Oh, for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 04:37 PM
1

In 2011, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that "nearly 20% of all women" in the United States suffered attempted rape or rape sometime in their life. More than a third of the victims were raped before the age of 18. Source.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 04:35 PM
3

How is anything in their sex life relevant to the topic?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 05:04 PM
1

It works as a comparison because you have average and the tallest position while negating to mention the shortest one. I’m just providing a complete picture.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 05:53 PM
0

The average point guard is ~6’-2”, and a number great players (Iverson, Paul, etc.) have been well shorter than that. Height does absolutely help but it isn’t the be-all-end-all (it isn’t the only defining metric of success).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 05:06 PM
1

NYC is fundamentally at odds with NYS. Tis the reason they have to have a city income tax; the state refuses to pay what the city requires despite the fact it’s the majority of the economy of the state.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 03:41 PM
1

NYC is a bit more liberal than LA, but I’m not from LA- I’m from a white conservative wealthy suburb 60 miles away. Also NYC isn’t a state so I don’t exactly understand the comparison you’re making.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 03:12 PM
9

I think being slight/petite is a better equivalent to tall/muscular for being generally attractive as a woman than being voluptuous. But as always, attractiveness is subjective and there aren’t any absolutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 06:41 AM
2

Everyone has their own life path and all are good. If you don’t mind me asking - how old are you and what’s the general idea of where you live in (urban/suburban/rural and coastal/midwestern/southern/non-american)? Edit: I was a virgin till my junior year of college and left LA at 25 having slept with a grand total of 3 people, but upon arriving in NYC a metric ton of girls were available and willing and my experiences skyrocketed.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 06:28 AM
3

She said she’d prefer not to.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 08:08 PM
2

I literally do not have a friend (male or female) in NYC that have less than 20 (most wayyyy higher). I do have many friends from my suburban SoCal hometown that are on numbers as low as 1 or 2. The difference between region and culture are crazy high; I have no doubt that you’re both accurately describing your respective cultures, but neither anecdote negates the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 08:04 PM
3

I don’t mind it so long as it isn’t intruding on my life, but I understand you do. Everyone has varying levels of acceptance of behavior (of all types). It’s not your call whether or not he personally cares about a particular behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 07:59 PM
3

He said unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 07:53 PM
1

I’m sure your site is a lot more reputable than mine, but: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/10/being-rich-may-increase-your-odds-of-divorce.html
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 03:07 PM
-1

Wealthy people have a higher likelihood of divorce, not lower.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 02:50 PM
3

Do you really think it requires being gay to judge the attractiveness of other men?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 06:18 PM
2

It is something like 75% effective iirc. It is definitely not a good idea to use it as temporary BC if you know you want a kid because those odds are terrible, but it’s still worth bringing up as it does exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 12:52 AM
1

Women’s risk of STDs aid much higher than men though.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 10:24 PM
2

You can also have the vasectomy reversed.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 10:22 PM
2

It wasn't then either. Dating wasn't very different at all back then; the major difference is that the number of ways to meet have increased.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 09:03 PM
5

It was probably *more* common in earlier times due to the fact that women had very few options (couldn't easily leave). When my grandparents divorced in the 50s, my grandmother immediately started dating her first boss (she had to work for the first time, the dude was 25 years her elder) for some semblance of stability.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/18 02:56 AM
2

It’s the stereotypically submissive characterization. It’s weird to me as well to fetishize it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/18 03:26 AM
1

I haven’t heard of it in forever, but where I grew up (70s-80s middle-class suburbs in SoCal), a lot of families in my neighborhood had them; they’d hire young early 20s Eastern European immigrants, house them & feed them and pay them like $50/week spending money and they’d have nights/weekends mostly off. And the anger comment was because you judged someone immediately in a visceral way without actually understanding what they were talking about. Impulsive as shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/18 01:55 AM
1

I think in that context they’re talking about a daily or live-in maid. No need to get angry.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/18 11:47 PM
3

I can name just about the same number with respect to rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/18 06:46 AM
3

It's a relatively common sentiment though. Oscar Pistorius? George Zimmerman?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/18 04:54 AM
1

I see the articles on it, so I guess it's correct; I wonder why they weren't in the top 15) in 1890 or 1900 (also Maddison).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/18 09:52 PM
1

Apologies if I'm misreading your post, but Argentina was never the #1 world economy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/18 09:24 PM
3

I don't know - my mom was born in '49 and majored in secretarial work in *high school.* And her parents sent the two boys to college, but not the 5 girls (because they could find a man to provide for them).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/18 08:38 PM
2

There isn’t a blue pill strategy; it is not red pill and isn’t trying to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/18 11:54 PM
1

Of course it does, but the point is that it affects women more. They are more susceptible to STDs and STDs do greater potential damage. It absolutely is relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/18 09:36 PM
2

I’d love to see your data backing that statistic up, but something tells me I won’t get any.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/18 08:16 PM
1

Pregnancy isn't the only concern; STDs are much easier to contract for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/18 07:24 PM
3

Huh? /u/SlimLovin responded directly to /u/azngirl7689 at the beginning of this chain... not sure what you're saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/18 06:15 PM
2

Some are! There are also a lot of places with high levels of poverty and low levels of illegal immigration that are also shitty areas of town as well. And I directly responded to it. No point in continuing this thread; best of luck to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 07:26 PM
2

You’ve asked me exactly one question in this entire thread; I have no clue what you’re referencing when you say “if youre going to attmpt to dodge the question” in a thread where you literally didn’t ask two questions. You think you make more sense than you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 07:09 PM
2

How did I dodge your question? You asked: when was the last time you drove through a town, known for its concentration of illegal immigrants, and said "wow. This is nice?" And I answered truthfully: I went kayaking off the beaches of Oxnard CA last weekend and it was an extremely pleasant day.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 07:02 PM
4

The number of legal immigrants in the US today is ~44 million, and the number of illegal immigrants is ~12 million. It’s pretty illogical to think that I’d assume you’re only discussing the latter when you don’t explicitly state it. To your specific point: I went kayaking off the beaches of Oxnard CA last weekend and it was an extremely pleasant day.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 06:19 PM
3

Stalin did not hate jews specifically - he espoused very specific anti-antisemitic ideals - nor did he kill them in any greater number than anyone else. He was an equal-opportunity murderer. >Stalin's 1931 condemnation of antisemitism >On 12 January 1931, Stalin gave the following answer to an inquiry on the subject of the Soviet attitude toward antisemitism from the Jewish News Agency in the United States: >"National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs characteristic …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 06:09 PM
3

I’m not sure what you’re getting at then. It’s not a democratic platform to go anywhere close to something resembling either actual comminism or Communism in any form. You’re just making shit up that fits your faulty narrative. You sound incredibly insecure.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 05:56 PM
7

Did you know that not all immigrants are illegal? Also, that isn’t really relevant to your point about increasing crime; you’re not implying the only crime they bring in is illegal border crossing, you’re implying they commit other crimes at a higher level than average which is completely and unequivocally false.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 05:52 PM
1

I'd love for you to steer me to any prominent Democrat espousing the virtues of Communism. That's an insane talking point not based in reality in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 05:42 PM
11

Did you know that immigrants to the US have an overall lower crime rate than those born in the US?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 05:40 PM
1

Single guy with no kids here; if I need to do something, I can do it. I've shown to the companies and bosses I've worked for that I do good work, put in effort, and have been promoted many times because of it. Taking a half day off is not an issue. Don't paint with such broad strokes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 05:50 AM
13

every teenage boys first crush was a friend’s mom This was pretty common when I was a kid as well, long before there was a Stifler.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/18 12:10 AM
3

As am I. Cheers!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/18 10:30 PM
3

They weren't the cleaning ladies we use today, they were maids/nannies, very often live-in and paid very poorly. But yes, you're correct that women in 1965 only did on average 10 hours of housework more than women in 2011 (at least according to this source) so they clearly weren't doing all the shit work themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/18 10:13 PM
10

I’m well into a 6 figure income and if I had to support my girlfriend (near 6 figure income) I would have to make a lot of concessions that I currently don’t have to worry about (cheaper rent being the big one). You are making concessions, you just don’t know it because you’re used to your current lifestyle. Would you notice if you got a $40k/year increase? You sure as hell would.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/18 09:55 PM
1

Relatively as compared to feeding your family off the dollar menu, plus you have to realize a lot of these people are single parents working two or three jobs just to make ends meet. It's easy for you or I to suggest grilling frozen chicken breasts (how I survived in my young adult years) but it's a fuckton easier to stop at McDonalds on the way from your bus stop. Also, I don't know where you live, but apples and bananas are expensive as fuck down here in Southern California.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/18 06:17 AM
2

I work in Glendale and the food is fucking incredible (but definitely not healthy). Everything in moderation though.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/18 12:40 AM
1

Average age to earn an MD is ~26-27. Average age to earn a PA is ~28-29. Typically doctors go straight to medical school after earning a bachelor’s degree where PAs typically work in the field for ~3-4 years. Physician Assistants aren’t younger than doctors, but they’re possibly more numerous (can’t find any data on that). It could also be that doctors meet their SOs in medical school (most of my MD friends did this whereas the majority of our friend group outside them waited till their 30s to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/18 10:50 PM
1

You have a good day as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/18 08:30 PM
2

I’m not exactly what you’re getting at. If I said that you needed to be wealthy to enjoy life on a median income, I’d be insane because the response is clearly indicative of a break in basic logic. I understand that most people don’t have the means to move to expensive cities, nor would/should many leave their family/friends/life behind to do so, but I’m just giving my perspective that experiences in a nation this large and diverse are incredibly varied; I’m not saying your experiences are wrong…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/18 08:27 PM
1

You made the assertion that it’s “HARD” to live in America and I suggested that the feeling on the topic isn’t universal for Americans.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/18 08:20 PM
4

Most of the obesity problems in major cities are generally isolated to the poor areas of each. It’s relatively difficult and expensive to feed your family healthy food day in and day out. I do understand that our nation is incredibly obese, but it’s just not been my life experience that it’s evident where I’ve lived. Additionally, London’s obesity rate is 20% (lowest in the UK), whereas NYC is 22%; not incredibly different.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/18 08:16 PM
2

Where in LA do you live? This is certainly not true where I am.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/18 08:12 PM
4

America is a big place, and your assertion isn’t true everywhere in the nation. I’ve spent my entire adult life in LA, NYC and SD and the number of slender, attractive women I see in each are astounding.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/18 08:11 PM
2

as
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/18 12:57 AM
0

Apologies, you're right. I just got frustrated and acted like a dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/18 11:56 PM
2

If it weren't a pervasive issue we're discussing and instead was one individual incident you were describing, I'd agree that it's victim blaming. However, you have stated that literally every woman (minus your current SO) you've ever had a close relationship with has hit you. If a woman is beat by her boyfriend and someone says she's at fault in some way, I'd fervently defend her, but if she was getting into abusive relationships continuously over time, I'd say she is doing something wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/18 11:17 PM
1

I'm not surprised - you don't come off as a man blessed with a talent for critical thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/18 10:38 PM
3

Yes, this was our breakup fight, and you should have a zero tolerance policy on this; self-respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/18 10:34 PM
7

I have been hit by one ex-girlfriend and my late mother (once, when I was 19). I have had many relationships with women both romantic and otherwise in my 42 years on this earth. It's just simply not as common as you're making it out to be and if you truly have never had another relationship with a woman that didn't hit you then you're either doing something wrong or fraternizing with the wrong crowd.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/18 10:31 PM
3

The implication is obviously that he knows; otherwise, it's an irrelevant point.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/18 10:21 PM
2

Your quote of his comment is wrong; he didn't say "no big deal" anywhere in his comment, he said that it's "not as big of a deal" which is completely different. Saying grand theft auto is not as big of a deal as murder is not the same as saying grand theft auto is no big deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/18 10:21 PM
1

Oh please. My grandmother was physically abusive to my grandfather (a golden glove boxer) and he never hit her back, even though at the time it would've been legal, because he could have literally accidentally killed her. Acting like these issues are only of our time is deceiving.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/18 10:15 PM
3

That's how I feel. I'm literally twice my girlfriend's size and if she were, in the heat of the moment, to shove or slap me, I would not even consider beating the shit out of her because I could. The exact same goes for smaller men. This is all out the window if there were a weapon because it disproportionally builds on their ability to do damage, but that's not what we're talking about here.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/18 10:07 PM
3

Anecdotal, but my ex called the cops on me (she was the aggressor) in LA and they didn't arrest anyone (though I was in handcuffs during the discussion). He did suggest that I leave her (we were separated to two different rooms by the two cops).
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/18 10:02 PM
3

The vast majority of DV incidents are not reported; most slaps do not end with incarceration.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/18 09:59 PM
3

I'm guessing they didn't want whatever man did this to spend a month in the county slammer, or to deal with the whole legal process and testify etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/18 09:58 PM
4

Then why would you expect we care about the consequences to you? Do you see the hypocrisy?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/18 04:05 PM
4

You joking? It's incredibly rapey. I think you should reflect a bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/18 06:05 PM
8

A girl that wants to fuck your brains out because she's specifically attracted to you isn't adequate - why?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/18 07:21 AM
9

Honestly, and I don't mean this in a bad way, but when I hear men complaining about how they can't find good women in their own society I think they need to look inward and stop trying to blame society. There are a plethora of good partners in every society, especially yours, and you just need to be patient and keep putting yourself out there. Honestly, the biggest benefit will be age and experience with life in general; the older you get, the easier your life with women will be. Your confidence…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/18 09:03 AM
2

I’m sorry you’re stuck in this world of fetishizing cartoons rather than the actual humans that embody their likeness.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/18 09:31 PM
9

I don’t think the majority of women would rather date or fuck Arnold in his prime over a skinny but fit Ryan Gosling. I’m not sure why you think cartoonishly large muscles are a blanket turn-on for women. To be honest, I don’t know any women that think this, even for a one night stand.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/18 09:24 PM
3

I must be. I’ll show myself out.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/18 03:33 AM
2

You don't create the definitions; that's the entire point - the definitions via a link you sent don't cleanly put the entirety of human work experience into neat little buckets. Saying that I'm "ignoring the definitions [you] gave [me]" is insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 07:03 AM
3

How am I being obtuse? You clearly said that managing an auto body shop wasn't blue collar work, which to me clearly means you've never worked in the environment. Managing any basic auto shop requires a specific knowledge & ability to do the work to be effective.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 06:44 AM
3

What's the clear definition? My father (previously mentioned) spent 41 years working as a machinist (hourly position), and then recently got a $10k raise to get a salary job as the lead machinist, but his salary actually went down because of loss of overtime. What is he? Blue, pink, or white collar? He still fervently believes he's blue collar. Is he wrong? Or is it possible your classification system possibly flawed?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 06:38 AM
3

Do you think there's a clear definition between between white and blue collar work in the US? I find it shocking that anyone might see it as black & white line between the two, but you clearly do. Have you worked in the "primary trades"? If so, who were your managers? Were they blue or white collar?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 06:05 AM
2

I’m not sure what your definition of “blue collar” is (I want to emphasize that this is not an attack, and is meant literally)- my 69 year old father is one of the most naturally intelligent people I know, but he still wears a blue shirt with the name “Mike” on it. I respect him more than anyone, but he’s still “blue collar” by his own admission. How do you define the term?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 02:53 AM
2

It is? How do you know? Do you know the person? Your entire comment is literally based on presumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 02:42 AM
1

I got into my MAE UCSD grad program with a GPA of 3.03 from UCSD undergrad. Have a MSME degree from UCSD. It’s not MIT, but it’s def a good STEM school (and I doubt 0.04 diff would’ve perturbed the path).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 01:52 AM
1

Agreed. My experience in engineering was exactly the opposite (I ended up getting a degree at the equivalent of a T1 school with a 2.4 GPA in HS before community college) and no one cares or recognized the fact I went to a good college unlike law where your school and GPA really do reflect opportunities. I was already established by the time 2008 rolled by so I didn’t have to deal with that. I run an engineering dept now and I’ve never “discriminated” by college because in my experience it’s ent…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 01:49 AM
1

Law specifically is fucked in this regard. I think it’s too often the “wtf do I do with this philosophy BA” crutch. It’s also slightly glamorous (at least compared to finance) which fuels the supply/demand. The people I know in finance make the most money by far when considering the investment in education, but if you don’t enjoy it it’ll be grueling. I have quite a few MD friends and they’re all easily able to cover their $300k student loans while buying houses in socal for $2mm.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 01:38 AM
1

Oh please. I make a relatively good salary now, but I got by fine in LA on way less than $80k when I was younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 01:25 AM
1

My mother was a lawyer and my father is a machinist... my friend is a CFO and is engaged to a dude that manages an auto body shop. I know there are women with these hangups but I wouldn’t say it with such authority.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 01:20 AM
3

Wait what? You presume to know more about an anonymous person than that person knows about themselves? What kind of insanity is this?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 01:15 AM
-2

I think you’re confused- we’re not arguing. 50% was a guess based on the idea that I know it’s a large number (and your post further acknowledges my point). What are you arguing then? My entire post stream was explaining that the number is high and you then argue and push my number higher (based on verifiable and relevant statistics - 73%)? You basically decided to try to attack me but misconstrued my argument and doubled down, furthering my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 01:12 AM
3

I’m a well earning man with an education and I wouldn’t consider a relationship with a woman that was whatever the equivalent of “Bob @ Home Depot” regardless of how attractive she was.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 01:04 AM
0

I don’t think it’s inherently racist (also note I’ve never heard the phrase “toxic blackness before”), but that it’s very likely, given the racism that still exists in our society, spoken by a racist. I’m also not sure about racism being based in feelings of superiority, but I could be wrong... most of my family is racist and I don’t think they see white people as superior, they’re just inherently uncomfortable around black people. I see it largely as a trait of supremely sheltered people.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 12:55 AM
1

My post: I do know in a significant portion of the US that absentee dads are a major problem; something like 50% of the African-American community grew up without knowing their father. Your response: [why don’t you believe single mothers exist in greater numbers than 4%?] I’d love to hear where you see me saying otherwise... are you just arguing for the sake of arguing?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 12:39 AM
2

You make a point that isn’t proven out by the data you presented as your proof. I don’t have a single opinion against what you’re saying, I’m just pointing out that your assertion isn’t proven one way or the other by the data you provided. Did you read the last half of my first post? I literally said how pervasive single motherhood is and you responded combatively saying single motherhood is high (thus entirely agreeing in the tone of disagreement).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 12:27 AM
1

Why are you so combative? I was very clearly agreeing with this specific point. I don’t have a position, I was merely pointing out that the data you presented doesn’t match the assertion you took from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 12:24 AM
1

I don’t think anyone sane would argue that “paternity fraud” isn’t unethical and immoral. But you’re the one making the assertion that it’s common, therefore it’s on you to provide the evidence/data, not me. I do know in a significant portion of the US that absentee dads are a major problem; something like 50% of the African-American community grew up without knowing their father.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 12:22 AM
3

That’s very obviously not the intention of the research you linked- you’re projecting a meaning that isn’t addressed and making speculative points without the data to back it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 12:14 AM
2

I don’t think there’s anything universal when it comes to attraction. I’ve fucked up quite a few relationships because I traveled too much for work, but you would probably put a high salary (which for me is intertwined with a lot of travel) as a universally attractive thing for men to have.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 12:00 AM
4

If you’re married to and having a baby with a woman who you literally think might murder you for a request like this, you need to seriously rethink your choices of partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/18 11:53 PM
1

I’m guessing you didn’t visit the coasts. All I see are insanely beautiful women everywhere when walking around BK or LA.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/18 11:32 PM
1

It's been that way for a long time.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/18 10:54 PM
1

Yep. Moderately attractive friend group, everyone gets laid plenty (well, single ones anyway).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/18 10:48 PM
9

It’s insane to me to be engaged the third time you meet someone. It takes me years to open up.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/18 06:01 AM
5

Choosing not to date based on height is not the same as putting someone down.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/18 06:59 PM
2

I’ve literally never encountered a situation where a woman chastised a man for not dating an overweight woman, and I’ve been around a lot longer than you. I have heard many women give a preference for height, but that jives with my experience that people are accepted in expressing a desire to date who they find attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/18 06:56 PM
2

I did it more on Okcupid than Tinder. And on eHarmony before Okcupid. My whole point is that the medium is a way to connect with people. I never felt any significant difference between the sites besides the interface and information required to join (and $$ in some cases). The concept of going out and specifically looking for a LTR before you've met someone is a weird one to me, but I understand that everyone's different. I look to enjoy my life; if it happens I meet someone great and want to do…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/18 01:50 AM
2

When I’m single, I’m not looking for anything specific. I’ve never specifically sought out a LTR; if I happen to meet a girl that I really like, I’ll continue the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/18 12:45 AM
2

I’ve been on many sites. I’ve had LTRs off Okcupid and Tinder, and I’ve hooked up with girls from all sites. Tinder does lean more toward hook-ups and eHarmony does mean more toward LTRs, but by no means should you make absolute declaration about them (which you did).
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 11:57 PM
2

That invalidates your point that Tinder is only reserved for hookups. My entire point is that it’s a multi-faceted platform.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 11:51 PM
1

In my age range at least, Tinder is used for both hookups and LTRs. I moved in with my GF (who I met on Tinder). I also have several friends married to people they met on Tinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 10:34 PM
11

You’re saying that Indian-Americans can’t have the same dialect as white Americans? That’s absurd. I have quite a few first generation (born in the US) Indian friends that have absolutely perfect dialects.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 11:56 PM
4

So are you telling me I’m either pro-gun and pro-life or anti-gun and pro-choice? I can’t have individual opinions on a variety of issues and still call myself either a Republican or Democrat? When did that rule come into place?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 01:16 PM
3

Wait, so now titles have to be all or none? Why is the team mentality so pervasive in society today? It may be revisionist, but I don't recall it used to be this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 12:42 PM
3

That's not even close to a relevant answer to OP's question. It's just a bitchy whine.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/18 10:19 PM
1

I don’t consider myself fat, but I’m definitely overweight and have never had problems sleeping with objectively attractive women. I don’t think women care quite as much as men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 10:49 PM
1

What? What’s the OP title mean then?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 03:17 PM
1

Trump wasn’t elected monarch - he answers to the American people, and is limited by the legislative and judicial branches (as well as his own Executive branch as we’re seeing now). Unless something changes, the American people are ultimately in charge and the vast majority opposes what you’re saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 03:11 AM
1

Not communist, but I am an iBanker and a staunch liberal. And there are a lot of us, just FYI. You attaching your crazy girlfriend’s beliefs to what she perceives to be is irrelevant. I’ve dated crazy feminists too, yet I still aspire to the notion of equality of opportunity.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 02:53 AM
1

The only way I see this happening is if ISIS somehow inexplicably becomes the ruling body of this nation.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 02:46 AM
3

I'm not a laywer so I can't speak to this; what states make you continue payment without reduction/temporary cessation? I've gone to a few of these hearings and from what I understand it's pretty universal in the states (I have quite a few divorced friends scattered about the nation).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 12:17 AM
3

Well, it's lucky for our society that you aren't in charge and that won't ever happen again.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 12:12 AM
3

No he wouldn't. Child support is based on income. Unemployed persons will have it deducted from their unemployment wages. Source: am paying it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 11:31 PM
4

So is your solution to remove child support, welfare and food stamps? Where does that leave the child? I'm seriously missing what your solution is. All I hear is a rant.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 11:28 PM
1

If you don’t care about your job/career, go for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 11:09 PM
1

“He walked” is a slang term used when someone is found not guilty. Random example.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 10:19 PM
1

To be considered illegal in most countries, the harassment must either be so frequent or severe that it creates a hostile work environment, or the worker's reaction to sexual advances must be tied to an employment decision such as being demoted, fired or offered a promotion. Source.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 10:14 PM
1

God, I hope you’re just being facetious. To summarize: Asking a subordinate/coworker if you can whip your dick out and masturbate is sexual harassment, but in most cases it is not technically illegal (you will be fired from virtually every organization for this). Whipping your dick out and masturbating without consent is illegal; you will most certainly be fired and likely charged with a criminal act. Is this clear enough for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 10:10 PM
1

Asking if you can whip out your dick in their presence is a key characteristic. It’s scary that this isn’t blanket knowledge.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 10:03 PM
2

His future prospects are bleak. He most likely won’t be hired for anything ever again.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 10:00 PM
5

I'm a bit older than you, but my evaluation of your experience against mine: Things our experiences agree upon: Women do expect their partner to be (relatively) as financially secure as them (we kind of agree on this): I've dated hundreds of women over the many years I've been alive, and it is generally (always?) seen as a benefit that I make a good amount of money and had a stable career that I love (or, at times, that I at least pretended to love), though I have dated women that made more than…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 03:30 AM
3

Are you joking? Changing a tire takes 5 minutes, and isn’t nearly as often a necessity as cooking/cleaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/18 03:44 PM
1

I have quite a few childhood friends that became doctors (I grew up in an affluent community outside of LA) and literally none of them married significantly younger, or significantly more physically attractive than they are. In fact, they are all very driven and don't really have all that much time to socialize/date (annoying for me as I want to keep up with my friends), and weren't terribly happy with their single lives because of this. I've also had no trouble dating women my age (37, and been…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/18 10:56 PM
4

Same. Went into a relationship at 25 and broke up 6 years later. Dating is so much easier in your 30s, and I suspect this won’t change in my 40s either (though I am in a LTR now at 37).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/18 08:49 PM
1

Granted I'm probably older than you, but I've slept with a lot of women; some became girlfriends, some didn't. But it's been at least 15 years since a girl required some sort of relationship contract before sleeping together. That's very much a thing that happens when you're young, at least in the circles I run in.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/18 01:30 AM
3

Most older men would probably also fuck Kate Upton. I fail to see how they’re different. Hot, wealthy celebrities are sought after. That’s not news.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/18 10:17 PM
4

37 here- wouldn’t date a 20 year old.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/18 10:11 PM
3

I've dated and hooked up with a lot of girls on Tinder that were objectively hotter than me. You certainly don't have to meet in your social circle, you just have to be interesting and fun to them through date 1. Female experience on dating apps is pretty shitty a lot of the time so it's really not too hard to stand out.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/18 08:34 PM
0

Nope, because it’s a complete fabrication.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 08:32 PM
2

So do most women. What’s your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 08:23 PM
1

This is absurdly untrue in my experience. Most women don’t give a shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 08:20 PM
5

I buy beers for my colleagues when we go out drinking, both male and female, and I don't want to fuck any of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 11:46 PM
5

No, I was working at a startup as an engineer.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:29 PM
5

I lived in Japan for a few years a decade ago... it is so, so different from Western (US) society.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:56 PM
5

This is absurd. Were you around in the early 90s? Kurt was a demigod before he died. I loved Pearl Jam and STP, but Nirvana was fucking huge.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/17 05:20 PM
7

I don't think you provided any statistical proof of anything at all in your OP...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 03:05 PM
2

Ahh, completely misread. You're right. Never mind!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 03:11 PM
1

Because I can think of so many examples of hot rich finance dudes in movies.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 03:10 PM
1

I assume you're joking, but what about the Wolf of Wall Street? Edit: ignore me, I'm an idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 07:26 AM
2

Racism comes out in a lot of ways. Do you never talk about politics in real life? I do think it's at least a little refreshing that you're not denying what you are - you don't further the "I'm not racist but..." meme. There's something to that. Either way, I'm done with this conversation, and I'm sorry about your struggles with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 03:43 AM
2

Do you realize you sound negative and racist on Reddit (granted anonymously) at least? My experience (anecdotal) is that people don't really have a great handle on how they're perceived, and I know for fucking sure the way you talk doesn't work with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 03:00 AM
2

I'll ignore the racism in your post- if the ratio is in your favor (on the order of many tens of thousands more single straight women than men) and a lot of those men are "pervy," then your odds are crazy good and you and your friends are doing something very wrong (or you're just undesirable). Do you casually spout racist statements and exude negativity in real life, or just anonymously on the internet? Because that could definitely be your problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 12:12 AM
2

Toronto is great. Ratio is insanely in our benefit. I used to abuse Tinder when I would travel there for work. Or are you in the suburbs?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 11:54 PM
1

Hence why we are either from very different places or you are young.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 11:52 PM
1

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 11:49 PM
2

Most of my friends are as well...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 10:51 PM
9

I think your world view is exceptionally skewed. I have many single male friends and literally none of them have trouble finding LTRs or ONSs with attractive women. Maybe it's just where you live?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 08:43 PM
7

Prostitution is not fully illegal in the US. Local laws control this.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 07:22 AM
1

I think if the only place you're capable of meeting women is at work then you're probably a bit of a derp (whatever that is).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/17 06:08 PM
3

That may be true in your group, but it is far from the norm. Roughly 10% of people met their SO at work. Less than through friends, at a bar, or online.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 08:10 PM
1

That's fair. I don't know anything about your situation or career but I think it's possible you undervalue what you could do if you put your mind to it (provided you actually wanted to move)- I moved to Brooklyn unemployed with only a couple thousand savings when I was 25 and it was the best decision for me. I do think it's much tougher to date in a lot of places, particularly the Midwest.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 07:15 PM
1

Yes, they are attractive and thin. I live in Los Angeles, and spent a decade (mostly single) in Brooklyn, and never had a problem. Honestly, I rarely ever see overweight people at bars or on Tinder at all. I'm going to guess your locale is a big reason for your issues - why not move?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 06:23 PM
4

Huh. I'm not super attractive and am a bit overweight and have had no trouble with either. Perhaps you have more to work on than you think? And regardless of that, how in the world do you think it's acceptable to make sexually suggestive moves on coworkers at work?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 06:12 PM
4

Your workplace is not there to be your sexual playground. Do your work, be respectful, and go get laid at a bar or the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 05:57 PM
4

Hitler's family doctor was Jewish; just because there are some women in TRP doesn't make it any less misogynist.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 05:52 PM
3

How can you love someone that you refer to as your property?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/17 01:26 AM
3

You don't speak for all men, and I feel sorry for any women in your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/17 01:19 AM
8

This chart takes inflation into account. You can't make a coherent argument by saying "do research" and not providing a link or any information at all. It's obviously because you're wrong and can't find any supporting facts to back up your batshit crazy notions. I'm done arguing with you; your critical thinking abilities are obviously underdeveloped and this is a waste of time. Have a good day.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 06:16 PM
6

What the fuck does "do your own research" mean? I pulled a chart of 50 years of data taken by the Census Bureau. What research of your own can you show to refute my chart? Also, shootings have declined significantly since the 1970s.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 06:12 PM
4

How much do you believe men made 50 years ago? Which of these lines promotes your viewpoint?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 05:44 PM
8

Honestly, I'll never understand putting sexual experience as a negative. Is it openly because you're insecure (in that she'll know you're awful in bed), or is there another reason? Also, men made less money in 1963 than they do today, and had no offsetting spousal salary to compensate. In what way did they have more power?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 04:50 PM
2

I'm a dude. No booty shorts.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/17 11:33 PM
5

That's absolutely false. I'm 36 and hook up with strangers from bars all the time, as do many of my similarly aged friends (both male and female). Maybe that's not incredibly common everywhere, but it sure as fuck is everywhere I've lived in my 30s (Brooklyn and LA).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/17 11:28 PM
5

If you're basing your entire life view on Greek life in school, then you shouldn't pose your question in such a general way.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/17 10:57 PM
7

Consent? Cat-calling is inherently without consent. Jesus dude. Do you think cat-callers have previously discussed their behavior with girls prior?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/17 10:52 PM
5

Cat-calling is not "being sexual." It's harassment.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/17 09:23 PM
1

Bear in mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/17 09:20 PM
11

I'm in Hollywood and literally never see this outside a club. Lived in NYC for a decade, same there. Where do you live that this is normal everyday attire?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/17 09:18 PM
5

It's insanely disgusting to me that someone would want that life for their daughters.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 08:38 PM
2

If you need to come up with complex theories to understand what makes men sexually attractive to women, you are obviously just frustrated about the fact that you're not. It's pretty fucking clear what is and is not attractive to any socially conscious person. You rail against women for telling stories based on their experiences rather than facts in story form based on your experiences. It's honestly insane to me that you can't recognize the ridiculousness of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 09:16 PM
5

You haven't provided a single fact in this thread; you're just telling me stories based on your interpretation of your experiences. Sounds pretty hypocritical to me. You think you're smarter than you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 08:59 PM
5

That is such a ridiculously misogynist statement to make. Nearly all statements out of every woman on earth are lies?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 08:39 PM
1

The argument is over the relevance to the jury of said facts and whether they are admissible in court, not whether the defense attorney is moral or immoral in trying to defend his client however he can. The jury only sees what the judge deems relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/17 07:06 PM
9

The rape scene in Pulp Fiction was definitely not portrayed as humorous.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/17 07:03 PM
7

More serious instances of "slut shaming" happen in the courtroom by their alleged rapist's attorney and by the media, not by their pastor.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/17 07:00 PM
8

I've dated, slept with, and had very drunk ONS with many women (including quite a few I know were clinically diagnosed with mental disorders) in my numerous years as a single straight male, and have literally never been accused of rape. Where do you get this 100% stat from?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 07:04 PM
3

If being emasculated by a stranger brings you pleasure, then Godspeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/16 01:01 AM
3

i think behavior admission defines 'break'.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/16 12:56 AM
1

Nice guysTM are not actually nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 08:19 PM
1

Maybe the problem is that you're taking random adults and putting them in bars full of college kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 03:57 PM
1

Wait, so because women are physically weaker than men on average, they are literally equated to children to you? I'd love to hear the logic that leads you to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 10:16 PM
1

My point wasn't that NO one has this opinion; clearly at least two do (via your Google searches for op-ed pieces on exactly this topic). My point is that it's not a widespread belief, even within the feminist community. Your OP states specifically that you're targeting people who DO believe this, yet the problem is that they are too few and far between to read some random post on some random subreddit to respond; the amount of actual responses you'll get from followers of this "doctrine" are ver…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 09:09 PM
2

Here's your problem... the vast majority of BPers do not believe the following is true, thus your question is not answerable. So it's pretty well established in feminist circles that being drunk removes a woman's ability to offer meaningful consent. As such if she appears to consent but is clearly intoxicated the man should back off and if he doesn't he is raping her. You're basing your entire argument on a ridiculous premise, therefore your question is targeted to no one, therefore there isn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 06:21 PM
4

My feminist rationale differs from your anecdotal, unattributed feminist opinion. I guess maybe it's true that groups of people don't always have a singular thought. That being said, I have a shit-ton of feminist friends (both male and female). In fact, most of the people that live in my large "town" (North Brooklyn) consider themselves feminists and have a LOT of random drunk sex. Most of my friends (again, male and female) have had well over 100 sexual partners over the past 5-10 years. Yet de…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 05:58 PM
2

Being young is not a personal attack - don't be so sensitive. I'm just pointing out that holding certain opinions without experience leads to fringe, black & white views on life, therefore the supposed feminists you're speaking to have no life experience to be able to dictate anything. And for the record, I consider myself a feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 05:53 PM
2

You're asking a question so targeted to the few idiotic teenage feminists you've spoken to that there is literally no way to have a real discussion here.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 05:19 PM
1

Not rape. Obviously. Jesus.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 05:18 PM
2

You're not offering any sort of debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 05:14 PM
4

No, it's not. How old are the 'feminists' you're talking to? I get, from the way you speak and the logic you present, that you're very young, early 20s or even late teens... if your peers are this age, they aren't (in general) capable of having a thought-out critical opinion based on experience on this issue; they are likely spouting generic points brought up by people the look up to who have a more nuanced way of explaining their opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 04:58 PM
8

I'm a mid 30s man, I drink a lot (too much, to excess), all of the girls I date drink a lot, and I understand this puts me in a very grey area at times. I exclusively date liberals (/feminists) and have had sex many times for the first time while drunk. Not once has anyone ever accused me of breaching consent. I think that there is a MASSIVE difference between sleeping with someone on your level of intoxication that is giving you obvious interest signs than there is with taking advantage, or pre…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 04:40 PM
2

I was under the impression that when a thread read "Q4BP" that TRP wasn't to answer as a top-level comment. Are you BP?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 04:15 PM
-1

Not really an answerable question for me, seeing as how I don't agree with the base premise (and an answer requires such).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 03:34 PM
3

Fellow 35 year old here- I struggle to have meaningful conversations with girls in their early 20s as well to the point that no physical attraction is enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 11:46 PM
2

Well, acting insecure is probably the least attractive quality in virtually anyone... I would wager it had something to do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/15 08:57 PM
1

I'm a 35 year old man that has gone to a US college and have lived in a slutty liberal world ever since and I have not seen or heard of it happening in my personal life. Marginalize my anecdote next, please.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 05:17 PM
0

Yes you can.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 05:14 PM
1

However, if you said "I have been witnessed to rapes & murders numerous times," I would suggest you look at making a life change rather than whining about it on an internet forum and berating anyone suggesting that you make a change.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 04:56 PM
4

So what you're saying is that you have literally no evidence to back your baseless claims, however when someone else provides actual evidence that disregards your life viewpoint you dismiss it with your "intellect."
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 04:37 PM
1

Do you feel you have something more relevant to add other than your condescension to relevant anecdotes? I'm surprised you don't realize that these are statistically relevant, on-topic samples - it's certainly more than you've managed to add to the thread other than deny the possibility that OP doesn't really understand boundaries and/or consent clues. Reading through a few of your recent comments makes me realize that you're very close-minded and don't have the slightest grasp of sexual relatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 04:35 PM
5

I think it's far more likely he's missing something when it comes to consent if it's happened with this many women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 04:31 PM
19

If you've been threatened numerous times by a cross-section of women, perhaps you should evaluate what you're doing. I've slept with over 100 women, many in a ONS, just about every single first time we were both drunk, and never once been accused or threatened of anything like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 02:00 AM
5

Do you think Stoya made this up?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 01:58 AM
1

I have literally never, not once, posted on TRP. Honest question: I've been on PPD for years, yet I never thought that maybe my lack of reply ability was based on something personal... might it be connected to my PPD opinions? I always assumed it was based on TRP requiring some sort of "admission" (ideal basis, not $$).
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/15 09:44 AM
1

Well, I'm not allowed to post on TRP without any infraction anyway, so I'd say that the subs aren't really that different in this regard.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/15 10:51 PM
1

To be fair, non-RPers aren't even allowed to post on TRP because we're not RP; preemptively banned without a reason whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/15 10:51 PM
-5

I think you just nailed it on the head.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/15 05:36 PM
2

What do you mean by "wonky gender roles"? By"modern gender roles", I mean equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/15 05:59 AM
2

That doesn't make any sense. Are you accepting of modern gender roles or aren't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/15 04:53 AM
1

So what you're telling me is that TRP is accepting of the way society is headed (specifically as it relates to gender roles)?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/15 04:14 AM
4

I see TRPers as people dissatisfied with the social structure as it exists today. People that are dissatisfied with the social structure are by and large not doing well in said structure, are not doing well in the structure, do not have good jobs or hold the attention of women. By this logic, TRPers are generally unsuccessful in life & with women, therefore they feel they need society to change to mold to who they are, which is their inherent goal. I know TRPers will say that their goal is to be…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/15 02:32 AM
1

You think nature is sentient? I assume this means you're religious.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/15 01:48 AM
1

I'm referring to generic TRP opinions, in that women are essentially inferior human beings; I apologize if this isn't you. And your reasoning is good to be where you are; the way I read your comment made it sound like you were unhappy where you are. To be fair, though, I'm interested in relationships as well (and have been in quite a few), but I figure while single that playing around while looking for someone that really matches with me is fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/15 01:47 AM
1

Just curious: why do you equate promiscuity with degenerates? I don't agree and don't follow the logic. Do you consider people like Derek Jeter or George Clooney to be degenerates?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 08:48 PM
2

Why not move to a place you like rather than develop shitty opinions of women then? You should like where you live.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 08:13 PM
1

You do realize most of the world agrees with me; there's only a culture of guns in the US, and even then only in certain parts. In all of the cities I've chosen to live or will choose to live have reasonable restrictions of gun control, so much that I don't really need to have this conversation ever again. I hate the debate and am thankful I don't need to. Goodbye, good sir, enjoy your weapons and your justifications.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 07:37 PM
2

I'm sure it is. I've also lived in LA for quite a few years and feel it's no different here, but yes, it's inherently easier than living in the middle of nowhere. Thankfully, I love cities, and my career revolves around them, so no worries.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 07:35 PM
2

Perhaps.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 09:51 AM
1

Honestly, I'd rather live in a place where kill-or-be-killed isn't tolerated. Gun control is sort of my bag. I don't feel comfortable with your "Rick James" types legally carrying, and I will continue to live where it isn't tolerated, but thanks for the advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 09:49 AM
3

If you're skirting 6 feet tall, height is not your problem with women. If I had to guess, you're 19 years old and that, coupled with your disdain of women in general, that is obviously your major problem, but I don't know you and can't justify your negativity further.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 07:34 AM
1

That isn't a coherent thought. Care to elaborate? In what way are homosexuals degenerates? Does their existence threaten yours? Do they threaten your way of life? Do they steal your women away? What do they do that makes you feel insubordinate to them?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 07:30 AM
2

Honestly, I do judge "them" in that I hate the marginalization of a particular segment of the human's population's emotions, which is a core tenant of TRP: that inherently, biologically & socially, women are inferior. I don't see how judging a bigoted group's feelings is worse than judging them themselves. And I also don't see how judging women negatively increases your chances of getting to stick parts of your anatomy into theirs. It's, quite honestly, baffling to me. Having spent some time in …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 07:27 AM
2

I'm happy to hear it. I like having debates with people that aren't inherently bigoted, but honestly that is s struggle here sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 06:41 AM
9

I'm not judging any strategy- I employ my own (conciously or subconsciously) which seems to work. My problem with TRP isn't on that side (though I feel uncomfortable calling it a "strategy as that feels wrong), my problem is the judgment of people that goes along with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 05:53 AM
5

Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 04:59 AM
9

I'm not unattractive; I'm tall and have a full head of hair, but I have a little belly and don't work on myself as much as I should. I think you're under-selling how much being personable and having an outwardly positive view on life will get you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 04:56 AM
5

Most people in my demographic have slept with a lot of women. North Brooklyn is a very sex-positive place.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 03:58 AM
12

I'm a 35 year old semi-successful mechanical engineer (am the director of an engineering dept but haven't ever started or held an executive role in any company) that has been single on and off in my adult life, probably for half of this time. Never married, no kids, very liberal, lived with three girlfriends, reside in major metropolitan cities (namely NYC and LA). I've slept with well over 100 women, but didn't lose my virginity until my junior year of college. I don't subscribe to any "pill" b…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 03:11 AM
3

As the director of a dept that is a perpetual revolving door of 22-24 year olds, I can tell you that they DEFINITELY are more "beta" (though I hate the term). As people get older, they become more reasoned, intelligent, and most importantly CONFIDENT. I spend a lot of my workday effort to try to make my employees feel empowered, but their tendencies are at odds with the idea. I can tell you from personal experience that I definitely have become more of an alpha type over the past 15-20 years whe…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 12:14 AM
3

I think that, considering a large segment of TRP is under 21, that most demographics make the average TRPer look very beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 11:51 PM
1

In the United States, paternity testing is fully legal, and fathers may test their children without the consent or knowledge of the mother. What is the non-partisan reasoning for it being illegal?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 11:47 PM
2

Ah, don't know anything about legal issues in France. The US is not this extreme. In the US, being a biological parent legally holds a LOT of weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 10:40 PM
1

Hipster Brooklyn, college-educated professionals, mostly single, mid 30s, very liberal. I do recognize that this isn't the 'norm' statistically, but there are a LOT of us. If my community has 100k (probably an underestimate) in NYC alone, that means there must be 100 communities of a similar size (10 million) that have literally ZERO people with 20 partners in their lifetime.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 10:36 PM
3

I'm very aware that the guy is an abhorrently ignorant bigot. I just wanted to understand how pervasive this ridiculous, backward sentiment was in his community.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 10:33 PM
1

I do not believe that 99% (or anything close to that) have had fewer than 20 partners. That is ludicrous. Are they polling 20 year olds? Maybe my demographic is a massively slutty one, but I don't think I have a single friend (male or female) that has slept with less than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 10:28 PM
4

Wait, what country do you live in that disallows paternity testing? In the US, a paternity test doesn't even require the mother's consent/knowledge.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 10:11 PM
2

Absolutely this. I drunkenly got in the middle of an altercation outside a bar in Brooklyn where the aggressor was CLEARLY in the wrong, and ended up with him pulling a gun on me. I was scared shitless; the experience completely changed how I react regarding conflict with strangers.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 09:40 PM
8

Wait, why is it the woman that is the one being irresponsible when two people have sex? I'm confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 09:09 PM
0

If I presented to you irrefutable facts (impossible) that you were wrong, you would not change your beliefs. You make assumptions to match what you believe the world to be like and discredit anything that doesn't match up. I'm just thankful that you're in the vast minority and thus are drowned out my more reasonable people. I'm sorry that women have hurt you so badly that you feel marginalized in our society.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 09:00 PM
1

So you disregard every anecdote that doesn't match a narrative with which you view the way things are. Got it. It's always nice to meet another intelligent, open-minded adult on Reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 07:59 PM
1

She owed alimony to my father as her wages while they were married were fairly significantly higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 07:50 PM
1

I'm not a divorce attorney; I just know that, at least in CA, my mother's assets prior to her marriage with my father were not factored into her alimony payments (and thus were significantly less than they would have been). Same goes to my aunt (also in CA, who married an older dentist that already owned his own practice).
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 07:28 PM
1

In general, assets acquired before marriage are not split.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 01:26 AM
1

My best friend works as a medical professional for professional sports teams and, at least of the ones in the US, the percentage of married athletes that cheat is nearly 100%.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 01:49 AM
1

Women do not make more money than men at any age by any metric I've ever seen. Please direct me to the statistical study that highlights this. Here's one I've found via Google that refutes your statement (1979-2010).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 01:46 AM
-2

I'm sorry, but maybe I missed where I said you were.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 05:03 AM
0

Look, I know you don't want to think there are any holes in your philosophy and that it's society's fault, not yours, but maybe things will get better when you start leaving behind the bitterness and taking responsibility for your outcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 03:29 AM
0

I was a very active member in my chess club, was cross-country captain (and a virgin for 2 years after HS graduation) but, by 34, have slept with nearly 100 women. Oh, and am very anti-TRP philosophy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 12:11 AM
2

None of these analogies make any sense. Why attack one while flaunting the other? They're both ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/15 08:21 AM
3

I'm a man and have been with a fairly high number of women and I actually question women that have a very low partner count (specifically because it tends to show that we likely have very different values). I'm very attracted to women that have sexual experience/freedom.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/15 08:19 AM
3

Some 2, some 3, some 4, some N/A. You're so sure that you know everything about every single man on Earth; displaying that kind of certainty about something in which you COULD NOT know says to me that you are socially ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/15 09:06 PM
7

To be honest, I don't understand the mentality. Do they view their sisters like this? Their mothers? It's honestly crazy to me. Also, I don't consider myself a BPer. I think by identifying yourself as such, you're giving an undeserved identity to RP, a movement that doesn't deserve an identity.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/15 06:55 AM
8

I don't know, I detest just about everything RP stands for, and when I'm single (which has been the majority of my adult life), I'm slutty as hell. EDIT: For context, I'm a 34 year old male.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 11:37 PM
13

I find this ridiculous. I have very close female friends that I am not in the least attracted to, yet I talk to them all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 11:34 PM
2

Pretty sure that he is, by definition, NOT treating them equally.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 09:54 PM
6

Is it possible these girls just enjoy having sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/15 09:20 PM
1

It's not at all, but it means your opinions are not relevant to adults. I felt the same way as you twenty years ago; you will grow and change. The opinions you hold now aren't based on real world experiences. It puts your arguments in context.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 11:12 PM
1

Admitting you aren't would make you a hypocrite by definition and admitting you are would either make your point stronger or illegitimate depending on the circumstances. Being worried about an internet stranger calling you a "loser" for being a virgin makes me assume you're still in HS and thus your opinion on the matter of social discourse (specifically pertaining to sex & marriage) can largely be ignored.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 05:20 PM
1

Are you a virgin?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 04:02 PM
3

I wouldn't say that permanently changing someone is a good strategy to finding a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 08:22 PM
6

The oft-used 'car' analogy is all over this subreddit. It's abhorrent. I'm pretty sure that most of the Redditers using it are insecure 19 year olds afraid that a girl will recognize that they aren't satisfying in bed. Desiring virginity, to me, is disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 05:46 PM
7

Exactly. The QB on my HS team was a decent QB, but definitely not attractive, and was NOT hooking up.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 05:39 PM
1

I'm a man, and I want a woman who either could or has been picking up lots of other men. How else am I going to to figure out where I stand on the herdiarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 05:36 PM
2

Only on Reddit is the average American man 25 years old; he is not earning average income and does not have average debt.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 05:47 PM
3

Ahem... feminists DO shit on false rape accusers because they undermine their entire movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/15 09:20 PM
1

Often, I think it IS his attractiveness (to her). I've had a girl tell me that it was unattractive to her that I played too many video games rather than looking for a more interesting/fulfilling hobby (fair), even though I was in a peak physical shape. Post-breakup, I've gotten into more interesting, social, fun hobbies (/career shift for the better) due to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 05:20 AM
2

I feel that this situation (specifically that men always want sex and that women use it as a tool) is completely overblown on these forums. I'm in my mid 30s and thus have many married friends (both male and female), and in my experience (anecdotal by definition), I've seen more women complaining about not being physically wanted than men. I've also been in a few long-term relationships and have felt both sexually unfulfilled and have been sexually unfulfilling (for completely unrelated reasons …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 11:19 PM
7

That same assumption isn't made in TRP's forums when genders are reversed, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 08:27 PM
20

This is so incredibly untrue. Maybe he has depression, horrible body image issues, medical issues, etc. There are lots of reasons men lose libido that aren't the fault of their woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 05:42 PM
5

Seeing how slavery was a huge economic factor in the time period... are you pro-slavery?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/15 10:13 PM
4

You really think that, morally or otherwise, 1715 America was a better society than today?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/15 08:09 PM
6

I think what you're saying made sense when I was in high school, maybe even college. As an adult, at least in my experience, men don't change their behavior at all when around women. Clearly a woman that has no fuckin clue what being a man is like lol To be honest, I'm fairly skeptical that you have any idea what it's like to be a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 01:59 AM
6

If you're not talking about yourself, then you're speaking for all men, which I resent as I have a completely polar opposite viewpoint. Female friends do for me exactly what male friends do for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 01:57 AM
7

Can you explain 'why'? I don't understand how you view women less capable of being worthwhile to you. I honestly can't see how you could have a half-decent sexual relationship with a woman if you only view them as a sexual possession.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 09:51 PM
18

I really don't even know how to respond to you. Your views are so deluded. Do you really believe you're incapable of being friends with women? Do you shun your sisters if they can't offer to help you get laid? Can you have a normal relationship with THEM? If so, why not an unrelated women?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 09:48 PM
15

Is there literally nothing in the world important to you beyond getting laid? Do you have any male friends that don't get you laid? You obviously don't view women as people if you see them only as a means to an end (getting your dick wet).
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 09:46 PM
11

You have literally zero real female friends? How old are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 09:45 PM
5

I was in love with my best friend in college (female) for years (I was awkward and didn't really understand how to display feelings back then, much like the Redditers who complain about "friendzone"). Now, she's married, I'm very capable of dating, and we're good friends. I have no leftover sexual feelings at all about her. "whats in that for anyone?" implies you don't value friendships. That's too bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 09:44 PM
8

I have platonic female friends who I would NOT want to sleep with.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 09:42 PM
1

I think our differences may stem from how we view sex. While it is a deeply emotional experience when shared with someone I love, it can also be enjoy it on a purely physical level (at least in my experience). I don't feel any insecurity that any girl in love with me is reminiscing feelings from past illicit encounters because what we have should be greater than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 04:10 AM
3

The point I'm making is that Gen-Xers were just as aware of this as Millenials, yet will have had more sex (10 vs 8 partners).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 10:36 PM
3

Well, I'm Gen-X, and HIV/AIDS awareness has been around since long before I became sexually active...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 08:23 PM
1

As is common here, you're defining substance solely on the merits of a sexual past. I've met quite a few very attractive girls (mostly friends from HS) with VERY low partner counts (artificially, for the same reasons that TRP dictates - so they can marry) that I would argue are so lacking in substance (vapid, narrow-minded, superficial, politically ignorant), and I've met many girls that have slept around in the past (& maybe the present) but make efforts to do great things for the world and are…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 05:08 PM
1

Your consistent use of the word slut expresses a contrary view of what you're trying to convey. The way I read your comment is that you think girls waiting to have sex with you is a bad thing (or "whack as fuck"), yet by virtue of calling them sluts, you're labeling them negatively for having had past sexual partners. Double standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 04:57 PM
1

I hate this analogy; it explicitly implies that experience equates to degredation of quality, which I've explained clearly above is exactly the opposite of my view. Do you feel that you've become less worthwhile a commodity each time you've slept with someone?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 04:52 PM
1

You're not wrong; I recognize that. My point being, people change. My dad was like me (well, the Vietnam vet / 1970s version of me), met my mom at 32 (prob equivalent to older in 2015), and was happily married till the day she died (after celebrating their 30 year anniversary). If it doesn't happen for me that way, that's okay, but that's what I'm hoping for. I guess at the core of it, I don't really plan my life around any sort of specific expectation of how I want it to turn out and it somewha…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 04:05 AM
2

I definitely would like to get married someday That isn't a statement of uncertainty. I do want to get married. I've been looking for a lot of years now. I've also lived with three different girlfriends; those relationships were good, but all had problems I felt were too significant to allow myself a life commitment. I'd prefer to be single (even forever, if it comes to that, which I doubt) rather than be in an unsatisfying relationship. And in the meantime I may as well have fun during the sear…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 12:19 AM
1

I find it interesting to understand differing/conflicting viewpoints to my own. It doesn't gain me anything. I don't really feel I was arguing in any of my responses either, just representing my own personal viewpoints via my own experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/15 11:59 PM
2

Probably. I don't have any set agenda to my life, but I definitely would like to get married someday. I'm completely on the fence as to whether or not I'd like to have a family.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/15 10:24 PM
5

It's not about capability in bed, it's about the mindset behind girls feeling that they need to treat their bodies as some sort of "gift" that I need to earn.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/15 10:21 PM
1

I don't identify with any pill. I'm just stating my personal feelings (and that of many of my friends). I'm a mid 30s single Brooklynite in case that matters. I very much like living in a sexually open environment and am looking for like-minded girls. And I've dated monogamously with girls that have a count as high as I have that I was never worried would cheat on me (and, for the record, I have never cheated on anyone I've dedicated to). I didn't say that anyone's opinions were "bad," just that…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/15 09:10 PM
4

Part of what I mean by "sexually open" is that she doesn't keep her partner count artificially low to keep her stock for a redpill high; a girl that waits till after the 5th date or monogamy conversations is probably not going to be compatible with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/15 08:31 PM
4

Because some of us WANT a girl that has had many experiences. I've slept with my fair share of women and am more attracted to girls that are sexually open.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/15 08:18 PM
0

Three real relationships. I've slept with more than the women I've been monogamous with.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 07:09 PM
0

I don't know your definition of short... 2 years (end of college), 4 years (late 20s), 1.5 years (early 30s).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/15 12:30 AM
0

She'd prefer someone inept at pleasuring who only knows sex as what he's seen in porn?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 08:27 PM
0

I've slept with a lot of women, but have yet to cheat on anyone once in a monogamous relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 08:26 PM
5

You sound a lot like me in college. All I can say (and what I wish I could tell my 20 year old self) is... don't worry, it gets better. This is all just made-up excuses due to a fear of rejection. And, yeah, condoms kind of do suck, and you'll never really get used to them. EDIT: I'm not sure if it's where I'm living (Brooklyn) or my age (31), but one of the only girls I didn't come onto early actually broke it off with me after a few weeks because I obviously "wasn't sexual enough for her." Whi…
/r/seduction20/11/12 08:40 PM
3

Absolutely, 100% agree. I know a LOT more about what I'm looking for at 31 than I did when I was 25 (back when I had "standards" and went months between hook-ups).
/r/seduction20/11/12 08:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter