TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mehrune Archive

View 4 posts and 213 comments by Mehrune on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

narrative The only narrative is that men in their 30s and 40s gaming 20s women are "predators" that are "targeting" them. It's sexist and removes both independent agency from GROWN women in their 20s, and dehumanizes men in their 30s and 40s for engaging in VERY normal healthy sexual and dating actives. You should be ashamed for being so ass backwards and sexually puritanical and regressive. What is this the 1700s?
/r/seduction17/04/22 03:17 AM
3

Yeah men are starting to wise the fuck up.
/r/seduction17/04/22 03:11 AM
1

Yeah. Right. There's no such thing as cougars. Yeah cougars exists, and I've been with several. What does cougars existing have ANYTHING to do with most women being more attracted to men who are older more attractive?(usually 2-5 years older is the norm) You're just strengthening the suggestion that there's a double standard. It's not a suggestion it's a fact. A woman being attracted to what she is doesn't get judged but a guy being attracted to what he is gets labeled as "creepy". Exactly there…
/r/seduction17/04/22 03:09 AM
3

Oh I noticed the same thing, glad I'm not the only one. I clicked into his profile and saw that and literally lol'd.
/r/seduction17/04/22 03:00 AM
2

Thanks and I agree with you entirely. I have had the same experience. The majority of the people I know don't even ask because we look like we're the same age and the ones I tell don't care much at all.
/r/seduction16/04/22 11:24 PM
1

I suspect you're correct. I would imagine the majority of dating subreddits are filled with women like this. Even some spill over into subreddits like this one as well, as evidenced by the comments. If their mentality rubs off on some men around my age who actually agree with those women than that's fine. Makes dating even easier for me. Let idiots think it's "creepy" for an adult to date another adult. I should probably stop trying to argue with bitter older women, or "men" who are imbeciles an…
/r/seduction16/04/22 10:50 PM
2

Good mentality to have brother.
/r/seduction16/04/22 10:33 PM
2

Definitely a couple of those chicks on alts in this comment section. fr bro
/r/seduction16/04/22 10:32 PM
1

He's probably just tall, healthy/younger looking(took care of himself), has his finances in order, solid game, fit, etc. Once you have these things along with a BIT of social status women don't care about your age.
/r/seduction16/04/22 10:18 PM
2

He was creepy because he was a stalker. If he did stalk her that is extremely disturbing.
/r/seduction16/04/22 10:16 PM
2

Are your really going to tell me that you're not going to find a guy who is in his late teens or early 20's attractive when you are in your mid to late 30's? I will add to this that she might not because women are naturally wired to find guys their own age or older attractive, not younger generally. However a better example would be a TALL guy with broad shoulders and alot of charisma and charm. Perhaps well off and safe/established. I'm sure she would find such a man attractive. However I'm sur…
/r/seduction16/04/22 10:16 PM
2

similar stage of life Maybe the 22 year old is closer to him and childless. Maybe the olderwomen children and are in a different "life stage" then him. Maybe he just started a new company in the same industry that the 22 year old ALSO runs a business in. Also what the hell is a "life stage" after age 18? What stage are you on after college and have your first job? Stage 15, or is that stage 16? I always get them mixed up. What level stage are you currently? A 34 year old wanted me when i was JUS…
/r/seduction16/04/22 10:12 PM
2

But there is a difference in life stages. Not really people can be all over the place at different times in their life after age 18-21. I'm talking about dating women around 21-24. I've met 20 year olds running their own businesses, and 40 year olds rediscovering themselves and going to college for the first time. You put far too much emphasis on age, and too little emphasis on genetics, upbringing, and people taking alternative paths in life.
/r/seduction16/04/22 10:09 PM
2

Agreed. Seems more like a beacon of chaste behavior from he 1400's, pseudo-righteousness and matriarchal ideals.
/r/seduction16/04/22 10:01 PM
11

Nah it shouldn't, but people like you should feel ashamed of yourselves for giving a shit about what adults are dating what adults.
/r/seduction16/04/22 10:00 PM
1

Yes. I'm 29 and last year I went out on a date with a 41 year old woman. When I'm 41 maybe I'll date a 27-29 year old... So what of it?
/r/seduction16/04/22 08:37 PM
7

young women should be protected its 2022 1452 FTFY from predators like you I'm 21.... fortunately your personality seems like it will keep them away lmfao Speak for yourself you ageist, age-phobic, indenifyist, totalitarian.
/r/seduction16/04/22 09:42 AM
8

It's funny that the person claiming intelligent young women are too inept to make their own dating decisions is calling other people scum. How backwards do you have to be, what century is this?
/r/seduction16/04/22 09:37 AM
2

a 3 year old can manipulate you too Maybe a 3 year old can manipulate you but I would like to think I could see through that, so that's not really a point. your point about 21 year olds being able to manipulate too Yes they can, and generally far better at it than men are. 21 year old women can cause just as much damage with their manipulations. The root issue is you overvalue the life of the "younger" women and undervalue the life of the "older" man, because your mind is an emotional one. Which…
/r/seduction16/04/22 08:55 AM
8

If you are a grown man with a developed personality and some intelligence it is creepy to be with a 21 year old. What if the 21 year old has a fully developed personality and intelligence? relationship is where it gets weird and manipulative Absolutely disagree. Also the younger women can manipulate older men as well. So its a case by case thing. This I agree with. But again if you are a mature adult some of these women literally are kids in the way they think and act and is it wrong to be with …
/r/seduction16/04/22 08:46 AM
13

This is true. I place these ageists in the same category of people.
/r/seduction16/04/22 08:42 AM
30

It’s because the arbitrary age of 18 set by the law doesn’t mean children suddenly develop adult brains. The age of majority is legally 18 and if they aren't adults than the law should be changed to where they can't drive, live on their own, have their own bank without parental approval, consent to sex, etc. However we both know that they ARE adults at 18, although people certainly mature at different rates with women maturing faster than men. he brain doesn’t stop developing until at least 25 y…
/r/seduction16/04/22 08:38 AM
3

older men who are going gray, bald, getting wrinkly, losing T, maybe fat. A man that takes care of himself won't experience these symptoms or can mask them until they're WELL over 45. Young women don't want these men. Older men who don't/didn't take care of themselves? Sure yes this I agree with as well. The vast majority of women find men between 27-38 or so the most attractive age range. Take any Hollywood blockbuster classic as an example. The leading ladies are usually in their early 20s, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 08:41 PM
1

Yeah maybe you guys are right, or maybe not who knows. I appreciate the advice though
/r/askTRP08/03/18 01:54 PM
1

You might be right, she doesn't know I'm as into her as I am though. Also oneitis is for dudes with one women. I do talk to some other girls and have slept with other women this year I'm single and have fun, but I do admit I really like this girl. ♂
/r/askTRP08/03/18 01:08 PM
1

You have zero abundance. Yeah, can't disagree with you there but I wanted and opinion on this specific situation and I got your's now.
/r/askTRP08/03/18 01:02 PM
1

Nothing wrong with that at all, hell if you want to you could even get a hair piece/modern wig. They're fully undetectable. I've never had an issue with men improving their looks. To each their own, I've seen some amazing hair transplant before and afters(although I have a full head of hair myself) I understand why guys get them and I have no problem with it.
/r/RedPillWomen29/10/17 01:48 PM
9

Who? Trigglypuff? Oh god, I would think not. The men that would are so far down the ladder they're basically the bottom 1%, overweight jobless omega males.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/17 03:06 PM
2

I see where you're coming from and I like your answer and I'm also glad you went in depth and gave a cogent explanation. However I believe fundamentally based on what you've said above you're misinformed with how low risk certain forms of investing work and how money can be accumulated with less risk than you would think. Also in my opinion in takes much more work to make it on your own and make more money without a college degree. Assuming the "risk taking" self made millionaire didn't take any…
/r/RedPillWomen08/10/17 11:17 PM
2

"silver spoon" You got it, silver spoon and steady/less risk vs self made, more wealth, potentially more risk(arguable).
/r/RedPillWomen08/10/17 10:57 PM
1

Not entirely true, there's many who take calculated risks and make money over time. All banks and the vast majority of worlds billionaires got to where they are taking calculated risks. I believe you're getting investing mixed up with speculation. Also speculation mixed up with gambling. Investing is a calculated risk as is speculation. Gambling is when you have no edge and would lose half or most of the time trying to get lucky. Assuming this self made millionaire wasn't taking huge risks with …
/r/RedPillWomen08/10/17 02:06 PM
1

Not entirely true, there's many who take calculated risks and make money over time. All banks and the vast majority of billionaire got to where they are taking calculated risks. I believe you're getting investing mixed up with speculation. Also speculation mixed up with gambling. Investing is a calculated risk as is speculation. Gambling is when you have no edge and would lose half or most of the time trying to get lucky. Assuming this self made millionaire wasn't taking huge risks with this cap…
/r/RedPillWomen08/10/17 02:06 PM
1

True that, which would you choose though going off the edit I made above? The lawyer makes $180k per year and the self made drop out pulls over a million with 10+ million in assets, house paid off, etc. He does take risks but owns a business as well.
/r/RedPillWomen08/10/17 01:30 AM
1

Ah, risks being past tense, good answer.
/r/RedPillWomen08/10/17 01:28 AM
1

I did just make an edit to clarify but if the millionaire has 10+ million in assets and owns his own house(paid off), cars(paid off), etc and no debt I which is more stable than the lawyer in the long term. When it comes down to it the underlying question is would you rather date a rich self made drop out or an ivy league graduate with a good income.
/r/RedPillWomen08/10/17 01:28 AM
1

Well of course it's important, but you didn't answer the question, if given the option between these two described men all else equal which would you pick?
/r/RedPillWomen07/10/17 04:16 PM
1

You. I like you.
/r/RedPillWomen07/10/17 03:59 PM
2

Great answer
/r/RedPillWomen07/10/17 03:50 PM
1

Ah I see, no I meant he is the owner of a business not a craft on the side. As for the invested money, sure, but there's plenty of stability when you have multiple millions in assets and most of it is invested long term, home owner no mortgage, no debt, etc. No need for a fallback when you've made enough money where you're already set for life and investing to earn more, imo.
/r/RedPillWomen07/10/17 03:49 PM
1

Good Answer :)
/r/RedPillWomen07/10/17 03:35 PM
5

No exactly the same, as stated i the question one went to an ivy league school and the other dropped out of school. The Ivy League grad earns a good living and the dropout became a self made millionaire CEO and investor. Which sounds more appealing to you and why, personality traits aside?
/r/RedPillWomen07/10/17 03:33 PM
1

I wouldn't say that, I was trying to imply the millionaire was rich and self made in the question. Obviously one would have to work hard to drop out of school and become a multimillionaire investor. Also the millionaire has millions in assets where the Lawyer would only pull $180k per year. Also if you can pull millions a year with your business(even if you are a part time CEO) and investing how do you not have footing? Why do anything else there aren't many other career options where one could …
/r/RedPillWomen07/10/17 03:23 PM
4

No the means at which it's earned I guess. The underlying question is Ivy League grad vs Self Made multimillionaire? All else is even(including intelligence), who wins?
/r/RedPillWomen07/10/17 03:20 PM
2

Ah, but as I said in the post all else is equal including intelligence.
/r/RedPillWomen07/10/17 03:15 PM
3

You know women with beards 0.0
/r/RedPillWomen07/10/17 03:13 PM
7

I believe there's many older men with younger women due to the fact that traits that make men attractive improve with age. Although some like looks can and do fade in many as they do with women. Your beard will go gray and you might go bald. Even if you don't your hair will probably thin.(or you could get a transplant lol) Also weight gain and "dad bod" can happen if you don't take care of yourself. A man doesn't hit the wall the same way. Donald Trump(putting politics aside) is proof of that. H…
/r/RedPillWomen07/10/17 03:02 PM
2

Thanks bro!
/r/askTRP07/04/17 04:48 PM
1

Good man. Keep working at it and you will develop better social/dating skills over time, stick with TRP and read the sidebar if you're new. Ignore trolls like /u/msminnamouse and especially ignore women. In time you will come to learn that women will more often than not sabotage you rather then make you a better man, be wary of your friends and keep you enemies close and you'll do fine.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/17 04:43 PM
3

Get off the subreddit. Why are YOU here? We don't hate women, we're all just realistic and likely vasty more logically grounded than you are. Women should be objectified, same with men. We live in a objective based world, you may "think" with your feelings but we all think with facts. Fuck your feelings, go somewhere else with your illogically based concern trolling and vacuous sense of righteous indignation.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/17 02:13 PM
1

KEK <--------------------This one right here. KEK KEK KEK KEK I'm actually 24 years old. Seems you have women and men confused. Not all men go bald sweetheart, most don't actually. Not all men get fat either that's usually women actually once they settle into a relationship, which is why I always tell all my successful male friends to drop women like a bad habit after a few months time. As far as impotency goes the two are closely related, and both depend on how well you take care of yourself. M…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/17 03:48 AM
1

I love how this is a women talking. No you're a retard if you haven't yet observed more older men date younger women than the inverse. Specially all the older men 30+ actually worth dating. Almost half of all famous "hot" male actors in Hollywood are 30-40's age range for a reason. The "sexiest man alive" is always a successful and good looking male in his 30's-40's, don't believe me? Go fucking google it and look into it. Also note every sports illustrated cover girl, or every "sexiest women al…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/17 07:23 PM
1

I'm a successful man that has traveled the world two times over and seen more and done more with my life thus far then you ever will. "Bub." If you haven't yet made these observations you're a dumb ass or your eyes aren't open. Many, many, many women prefer a successful older man who is handsome and not bald and muscular to a guy in his 20's who is not yet put together and if you say otherwise you're lying and will have to provide evidence. Almost all women prefer a guy to be slightly older than…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/17 07:23 PM
1

Yes, it really is "that bad", would you want to stay in a relationship with a man whom was sleeping with several other women while you weren't allowed to sleep with other men? Edit: Also what are you doing on this sub for males spouting bullshit. I hope you bf/husband/future bf cheats on you and you hop on Reddit angry/depressed about it just so I can comment...is it really that bad? Most humans are geared for serial monogamy, not polygamy, especially women.
/r/askTRP26/02/17 07:15 PM
2

There will be tears :) Nope. Read: he has a lot of options. As do all successful men aged 26-27 to about 45. Sounds like you're bitter and probably a troll. MGTOW and TRP is becoming increasingly popular and men a realizing that there are no "good" women and that they're all exactly identical, and good on them for it. Don't marry, and don't have kids.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/17 03:40 AM
2

You're a fucking moron if you haven't yet realized plenty of younger women are attracted to older men.(successful alpha older men) This coming from a 23 year old guy, it shouldn't surprise you at all. Something tells me you aren't an RP'r at all.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/17 03:38 AM
1

Fair enough, and I'm sure some women are like that. But most are not. Most women are like that, while some are not. Those few buy sex toys and things of that nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/16 04:50 AM
4

applause
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 11:44 PM
5

This is why Atlas is one of the best posters on here, always telling it like it actually is. Literally lol'd at this shit
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 09:48 PM
1

Yup it's the perceiving over judging I think. I'm ENTJ-A and I'm pretty much a headstrong extremist...my "judging" is about 70%.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 06:47 PM
3

A man with a spine can't be a feminist because no matter how altruistic he is, his goals do not align with feminism. Couldn't have said it better myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 06:45 PM
1

Used to feel the same way as a "purple pill", slowly and progressively became more redpill the more I interact with people on a day to day basis and see everything we discuss plan as day.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 06:41 PM
3

Sounds about right with the context of this website which is pretty much a glorified forum. I'm ENTJ, and a male redpiller.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 06:39 PM
1

That's pretty much what I just said above for the most part, that's why to comparison so so accurate. I point stuff like this out and people...especially blue pillers lose their shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 06:31 PM
6

To have casual sex? Lol get real sweetheart, you need only exist to have casual sex unless you're trying to land a top 20% guy for that purpose...than yeah you need to be a little more attractive. I consider myself top 10% of men and I sleep with some girls over 21 BMI depending on how they hold it, and I've slept with women over 30 that had some skin imperfections. Edit: have a good career LMFAO, not even going to comment on this but men don't care at all about your career, unless you're talkin…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 06:30 PM
1

I get laid quite a bit bud, see here and learn to read: So this is subjective...for example I get laid on average twice a week usually with the same fwbs/plates and I swap them out as I meet new women, but this isn't common at all either I believe. http://imgur.com/(null) Ahem truecel...your link is broken my man, please fix so I can have a good laugh at whatever 90% study you quoted. Probably if men have gotten laid in the past year or something...of course 80-90% of 18 and over men have had se…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 06:29 PM
10

Do most men have casual sex? Nope. Let's ask two follow up questions: Are most people who have casual sex women? Yup. Do the top 20% of men(appearance wise) have more casual sex then any other group? Yup. 80/20 rule, all about appearance. Accurate guide to having casual sex: For Men: Get to 8-12% bodyfat depending on your build, preferably 8% though. Have thick hair...and if you don't get a hair transplant. Be light skinned and have a slight tan. Lift and get muscular, you will need to get as cl…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 09:54 AM
1

Many of these beta guys you describe are going to be the guys that flock into virtual reality and start using sexbots when they become acceptable and identical/better than the real thing, which they will be sooner than later. Much to the dismay of feminists and women who hit the wall in ten years there will no longer be a beta safety net. This also benefits attractive men like myself who will still be running PUA game in ten years, it will become MUCH easier to pick up women as the script will f…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 09:32 AM
2

Right you are my man, except... I guess dudes will never stop wifin' up ho's. They're all ho's dude, literally all of them AWALT.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 06:19 AM
8

In general I don't think it's that common. Probably becoming more common, and certainly more common than you believe it to be. I'm going to assume you are a women based on your assuming most people have regular sex, because only about half or so do, most of them women...I'll explain more below. Most people have sex. Hehe, not in Japan...but on a serious note you're somewhat correct. There's many deadbedroom relationships and men who get nothing but monthly "duty sex" anyway. So this is subjectiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 05:55 AM
1

Do you think you'd lie to see what you could get away with? Exactly that reason originally, now I lie with a purpose, and do so with ease. Do you remember any other motivations for lying? None that I know of. Haha, me too. I'm looking forward to the days of robotics and humans mixing. Good you should look into how amazing the future will be. It'll take a lot of money though. At first, price performance ratio improves overtime, see cellphones circa the early 90s vs today. Ours are now cheaper, fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/16 06:55 PM
1

What stops you from searching in other locations? Nothing, and sometimes I do. I've been considering hitting up nerd conventions and picking up a semi-attractive nerdy chick. Maybe then they might actually be fun to talk to. Do you have a guess for how many times you've had sex? Random guess? Idk dude I've done some shit...sex parties, etc...probably like 600-650. I've had sex multiple times a day(5-6) with some girlfriends & fwbs.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/16 06:52 PM
1

Do you think anarchy couldn't work? See the pre-middle ages, in short no I don't believe so. Although men would have a bit more fun I think. Definitely more benefits in a world of anarchy for men than for women. In a hyper advanced society(singularity, which we're heading towards) men will have the upper hand again in the sexual market place, will take 15-20 or so years though. Think full immersion virtual reality(30 years) and intelligent and realistic sexbots(8-12 years). Read into Kurzweil an…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/16 06:49 PM
3

Nail on the head.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/16 05:29 PM
1

I already answered this numerous time prior in my comment history if you want to know more. Short Answer: Nothing bad will come of it, and it doesn't(read: couldn't) flip the burden of proof, it will also be beyond a reasonable doubt in criminal law. Not only that but you can very easily prove your innocence(as you can now as well) with affirmative consent laws, based on ALI's most recent proposal for the modal penal code.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/16 05:23 PM
1

Coming from you this feels oddly sweet. I love you too boo boo. Where do you typically find women? Online, bars, raves, parties, and more recently retail stores. What's your n count? 86, will be 89 this weekend(No I don't have any STDs).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 07:28 PM
2

Don't mention it, thanks for the agreeable back and forth.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 07:18 PM
1

Precisely they only want to get other guys riled up for nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 07:10 PM
1

Much appreciated my fellow lawful evil, anti-beta, fact before feelings companion.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 07:10 PM
2

Nope, they're wrong. California's "yes means yes" policy only applies to colleges, and also even then allows for nonverbal consent as well, in every college it's applied. It doesn't fully shift the burden of proof either, it is based on a preponderance of evidence(50/50), still wrong and retarded no doubt, but nothing like the hyperbolic clowns would have you believe. There aren't yes means yes laws going up anywhere that would make any of what these people claim a reality. Don't drink the kool-…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 06:50 PM
1

Yes, but I've only met a few unfortunately. How about you?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 06:33 PM
1

The American Law Institute, no changes to the modal penal code really happen without their approval. All the best law practitioners in the country are members.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 06:27 PM
1

I agree - another reason to be glad I live in Canada. We're nowhere near enacting any sort of Yes Means Yes legislation. IMO it should be a tool for education, not the legal system. We aren't either, ALI was fully opposed to it. We will instead have an affirmative consent system where conduct(throughout the day/night), nonverbal ques, and body language count.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 06:16 PM
1

Alright so if the defendant wants to exonerate themselves they would need proof of "one" verbal yes I presume. still foolish it should also include nonverbal cues and body language.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 05:45 PM
1

I understand and I had said prefacing my comment that I was disproving that ALL men where exactly as you described. Although I do agree for the most part, most men are like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 05:43 PM
1

No idea yet, but believe me if they're out there I will find them! It's my fucking quest. Edit: Yo, reply to my other post I wrote in response to you. Why don't you back ALI's proposed sexual assault bill?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 05:42 PM
1

over an established relationship and the very real consequences that could spring from your actions. There aren't any consequences for me, I don't nor have any ever "cared" for any of my girlfriends.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 05:24 PM
1

What kind of evidence though..let's say video or audio evidence, could he produce that would auto exonerate him. People don't ask for consent every nanosecond.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 05:22 PM
1

How could a guy defend himself against a false accusation under "Yes Means Yes" as you define it?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 05:17 PM
2

You get sick of being with them after 5-6 months? Yup usually sooner I should say. Is it like boredom combined with annoyance? A strong feeling of boredom along with with declining sexual attraction to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 05:04 PM
1

Even if you are being truthful about yourself, this isn't indicative of most men. Implying that it is is inaccurate to say the least. I never did, this is me and me only, not all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 04:58 PM
1

Haha, the ideal scenario. I see myself as neutral evil in general. I used to see myself as neutral evil as well until I realized just how important the law was in society and the consequences of appearing as though you've violated it at all. On a side note, do you listen to much music? Yes of course, mostly mainstream heavy metal(90's to today), some older metal and punk. I also enjoy EDM, old school rave music, and some classic rock n roll(The Doors for example).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 04:46 PM
1

Did you learn mostly through experience? Or did you study too? Both, mostly through experience and it helps to start young. I became a pathological liar in first grade, didn't even know what that term meant until third grade. A rather efficient way to have many many children and carry your blood on. For whatever reason I simply don't feel the need to do that, but I personally want to live forever using future technology. Did you hear about a guy in China or Japan that was a successful businessma…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 04:39 PM
3

This, oh my god gentleman do I know this feel. *Edit: I don't say anything because I don't want to ruin the entirety of the sex itself by making them "self conscious". So I instead wait until after to tell them how much they suck at giving head. It's an amazing neg because then they want to learn how to do a better job, and they practice with me. This gents is how to properly neg, always have an objective in mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 04:32 PM
1

I looked at my ring and walked away. Lol, hey man to each their own, more for me. Although I'm never getting married either. I'm really just wondering what the fuck is wrong with me. Good questions, there's many modern day men that are too feelz before realz.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 04:29 PM
0

Oh my...you're back? My sincerest apologies however I once again replied in kind and the reply was intended to be "witty". As far as being civil goes it would appear as though they also violated that rule, as well as several other posters on this debate subreddit do fairly frequently. The comment could be argued to be civil in fact as it isn't a direct attack on their character, whereas theirs could be argued to be uncivil as it was a direct attack on my character when he/she didn't reply with l…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 04:14 PM
1

You just went full blown literal on that response man, you're taking the comment at face value, as it's just met to be applied in the sense that for the most part you shouldn't trust other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 04:03 PM
1

Wow, it's interesting that she didn't speak to you for a year yet you were then able to make her comfortable enough to continue being FWBs. I am a Machiavellian god, no doubt. Humility on the other hand... It can be a rather effective way to pass on your genes. I agree. She expressed wanting your kids enough to cuckold her future husband? Yes if we don't settle down together(we won't) this is something she expressed she would be open to. Although I still probably won't, I don't trust people on g…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 03:57 PM
1

Good, that's how it should be. No one owes anyone anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 03:55 PM
1

I definitely believe that Tywin should go see a shrink. You're wrong if you believe Tywin would even respond to therapy. That is one dysfunctional family Because his children are disrespectful asshats.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 03:54 PM
1

Dude, that's really great that you would do that. A lot of 'normal' men in this thread would not do that/they think that it's ambiguous because she didn't verbalise the 'no' and it's on her to do that if she wants them to stop. Hard to believe most normal men wouldn't, perhaps they just aren't any good at sex, I would imagine most men aren't from what I'm told by other women. I think that's a really ridiculous position and they're in the moral wrong. That looks like a fairly standard and non-exh…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 03:52 PM
1

I always play mind games with my therapists and have done so since I was a kid. That doesn't necessarily mean therapy is not useful to you (I've been through about 15, lol). Therapy for someone like me is fruitless as I'm a natural dark triad. I had to go see a therapist when I was very little because my mom caught me mutilating my pet hamster and some creatures I found in the woods. Years after I quit going to his "therapy" sessions I infiltrated his family as he seemed to really care for his w…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 03:48 PM
1

I would presume it comes from sadism, enjoying the pain and suffering of other creatures. Yes, this is true. Perhaps part of it is how people seem to make a big deal over what is often trivial? This does play a role, to me human attachment is inherently meaningless, but to them it's everything. I'd describe true love as a form of being obsessed with someone, they are often in your thoughts, and you appreciate the animal that they are, how they behave and react to things, see the world. It's a be…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 03:23 PM
1

Sure, but it's more like you deal with the law than want to uphold it and believe in it strongly. You're wise about the law, you don't want to follow it, you follow it because it's the smart thing to do to avoid police and prison. Precisely, you get it. Or are you completely against breaking the law? I would break the law if I knew with infallible certainty that no one would know and there would be no repercussions.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 03:10 PM
1

All real men don't, I know I wouldn't be into that shit. Wouldn't be surprised if some blue pillers were though.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 02:58 PM
1

One doesn't have to violate the law to destroy their enemies and ruin the lives of others. Avoid breaking the law to avoid getting into any legal trouble. Morality and lawfulness are two distigushed entities.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 12:58 PM
1

You can learn to measure dark triad characteristics in therapy. And, if they're there because of nurture (trauma is often the cause of antisocial personality disorder) rather than nature (biology) you can ease a lot of the symptoms by working through their core. I was born like that as far as I'm aware. I behaved very much like a psychopath -- cold, calculating, no empathy -- after being raped. The trauma created some kind of temporary antisocial personality disorder and serious sadistic tendenc…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 11:11 AM
1

The only men in their 30s who can genuinely get women in their 20s - girls who aren't putting out in exchange for resources - are the men who are remarkably good-looking in their 20s and keep their hair and looks into their 30s and beyond. Like I said...good lookingmen in their 30s. Nah, I don't see this at all. I know a bunch of very attractive girls and they're all single, or they have very short term-relationships because they can't get enough of alpha dick. Most young women nowadays don't ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 11:07 AM
2

Just because a child procures a large sum of money doesn't mean they owe their parents shit, or anyone for that matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 01:39 AM
2

Certified Dank.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 12:20 AM
1

I like my own setup, I get to know my FWBs and plates, and on occasion I go out with them in an exclusive monogamous relationship for 5-6 months and then breakup. Sex is always better in a relationship. I could never only fuck one women for the rest of my life though, but for the people who are okay with that(and vice versa), all the power to them. I love being single and juggling different girls who all beg me to be exclusive with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 12:19 AM
1

Can confirm, looks matter as well though.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 12:17 AM
2

Personality type would be no indication of sex drive, I'm an ENTJ-A and I could have sex 6-7 times in a day(and have), but generally after the 5th-6th time the skin on my dick starts to get sore and I'm pretty tired. I'd prefer twice back to back once a day, hard to find someone to keep up usually.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 12:12 AM
1

Tbh can't be bothered to read all of the data, my mind works in metric system and I'm too lazy to convert things, but I hear ya, 4-6" seems accurate. Around 11-13cm taller on average.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 11:12 PM
1

Oh, so that's how it works. Got things wrong in class, chemistry teacher oversimplified it. Sounds like it, yeah. Yeah, I suppose. I know women going to such a height difference to score that sweet spot that I'm literally having mind gymnastics wondering how on Earth does their sex look like. And most women are shorter than that and want a guy who's at least taller than them or taller than them + heels, so that seems ideal for an average woman. I've had some pretty crazy looking sex with short g…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 10:56 PM
1

Why do you think you get an immediate smile/laugh reaction? Not sure to be honest I wish I knew myself. It pisses me off more than anything because it makes me come off as an asshole, which I am but not overtly to other people. The same thing happens when someone is bleeding, or in pain and sobbing, it just triggers an instant smile I never used to be able to help it. I used to think it was normal until I broke up with my first girlfriend when I was 16 she started bawling and I laughed my ass of…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 10:48 PM
2

Good the more NTJ's the better idgaf if E or I, there's too many sensitive pussies in this day and age.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 10:26 PM
1

do you boo boo
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 10:25 PM
1

Tbh I'm not sure that's true, balding is a sign of high testosterone levels, as is a beard and good fat to muscle proportion. Nope, it's a sign you genetically are predisposed to hair follicles that are more sensitive to the effects of DHT. Although it can also be an indicator of high stress throughout life, implying he's not very fit. Hmm... This as well, plus bad genes. And the height probably depends on the population (biologically, like the ethnic group she belongs to which shares similar ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 10:24 PM
2

Yeah this is a good way to start being an extrovert, but this is just a starting tip. I could teach a fucking class on this shit the way I see other men fumbling their words around like social retards and orbiting chicks forever in the "friend zone". So many men miss their potential IoI's it's hysterical.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 10:10 PM
1

Makes sense, good to know T's are better workers not surprising at all it's my strongest trait.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 10:08 PM
1

What test are you taking that's giving you assertive level? The very same test linked in the OP, see my results down below. https://gyazo.com/e5c5eaeae1e6f191143293d748d4d7bd Do you truly not experience empathy or do you overlook feelings? I don't experience empathy but I know what it is and I think I can get an idea as to what it feels like, but I wouldn't know for sure. I don't form connections to people I know well as others seem to and often times I see people are sad, or crying, or depresse…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 10:06 PM
1

of course you are. Damn straight my husband is an entj too. Who bottoms, I would imagine you do lol? Didn't realize you were a women. im an intj Good the more NTJ's the better. I have an innate disgust for altruistic people.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 09:19 PM
2

Hell yeah, that's how it should be interpreted. Don't force your beliefs on others but don't be a bitch about them either. Agree to disagree and let them move on if they don't like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 09:14 PM
2

agreed but male esfjs are as rare as female intjs i think, the most common male types are estj and istj, it doesnt make sense that the most common males didnt evolve to be the appropriate mates the to average woman, imo Spot on brah whats youre type ENTJ-A 85% Extraverted 60% Intuitive 92% Thinking (Don't experience empathy, I do treat others with respect though not all sociopaths are bad people) 60% Judging 76% Assertive
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 09:11 PM
1

Ehhh I would say more so ESFJ would be more likely husband material. Feeling is not an alpha personality trait it is a beta personality trait.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 09:02 PM
3

Oh yeah, if INTJ's would just learn some basic social skills and learn to be more extroverted they would be fine. An introvert can feign being an extrovert, and an extrovert and feign being an introvert, but you can't pretend to be insensitive you either are or you aren't. It's that NTJ part that's important as far as not being a bitch goes. My biggest tip I give to my beta family members is instead of asking you directly state your intention and not beat around the bush. For example they might …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 08:57 PM
3

Lol astrology...also I don't take this shit that seriously, but they obviously have people nailed down pretty well. Just about everyone I know fits into one of these personality types. I believe mines pretty spot on.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 08:31 PM
3

INTJ's can sort of pull off the successful omega thing in this world of geek fetishes. There's that, but if they got out and did more they could emulate an ENTJ, so long as they're assertive. Most people don't realize how easy it is to not be a bitch, I swear some of my brothers act like if they speak up someones gonna attack them or something. As an ENTJ as long as you don't bust balls too often and you're considerate no ones gonna start shit. Also being 6'1" and cut 210lbs helps as well. It's …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 08:29 PM
2

ESFP women are fun, but the men are just so punchable. My cousin has this personality type and it drives me up a fucking wall sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 08:24 PM
1

do it brah
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 08:19 PM
3

INTP is the most beta. I would think ISFJ(The "defender" lmao) are the most beta. INTP would be more omega than beta. We need to do an RP version of these and give them RP names. ENTJ(specifically -a) would be by far the most dominant. Also willing to bet an INTJ(-a) would be the second most dominant as well, given that they're an introvert because they don't like people and not due to the fact that they're a shy beta bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 08:17 PM
2

Yup
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 08:12 PM
2

ENTJ-A, all day.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 07:53 PM
2

First thing I noticed was how flirty the girls way to young for me were.. Is it really that bad? Yes and it is going to get worse, FAST. Once this generation of women hit the wall they will collectively freak the fuck out. Alpha Chad won't want them because there will be younger and hotter pussy chasing him and Doormat the beta male won't want them because he will be too immersed in his sexbots and virtual reality games. This is literally not just the future we're already here the ball is alread…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 06:23 PM
1

I honestly feel like I'm the only sociopath even in this comments section. You're not the only one, nice flair btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 06:18 PM
2

Alright, good to know. Thanks for ruining all the fun. :(
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 06:17 PM
6

women do not marry based on sexual attraction alone. Yes but women dole out sex based on physical attraction alone. Then hit the wall and marry a beta doormat to take care of her chad spawn. Too bad those doormats are rolling themselves up and checking themselves out one after another look at Japan now, and it's only going to get worse overtime.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 06:14 PM
2

Have I directly broken any rules? If I have done so let me know, I felt I was being civil, she said we redpillers are nasty people so I responded in kind, never directly insulted her though.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 06:09 PM
2

I never said jack hammering was great "plow" could mean anything really. Also I know for a fact women prefer a longer and much thicker dick to a thinner one.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 05:58 PM
4

You didn't say that -- but you're RP flair implied that. I'm familiar with the ideology to which you subscribe. Ehhhhhhh, I agree with it about 60% of what they have to say. No normal woman responds to someone who is constantly maintaining frame, threatening to 'next' them as a part of dread etc. I don't do stuff like that nor agree with that either, actually that's a big portion of RP that I don't agree with. Dread game when applied appropriately(implied dread) can work but usually comes off as…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 05:51 PM
1

I'm confused about this, then. All I have ever been advocating is for non-verbal affirmation of enthusiasm. Oh my bad, perhaps I was blowing what you said way out of proportions. I agree that non-verbal affirmation is a good thing. I was responding to someone who was saying that if you notice that your partner's uncomfortable, but she doesn't verbalise that discomfort, and then you keep going, it's not really that bad. Well that's terrible and I would vehemently disagree with them. I'm not sure …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 05:43 PM
12

I am a 'slut'. I have never intentionally fucked a man who's an asshole. That kind of thing is just a huge, huge turn-off. Good, not a fan of assholes myself regardless of gender. I'm a male 'slut' and for me it's mostly physical appearance followed by intelligence that I'm attracted to. I am not an asshole...I'm just not a pussy. I don't take shit from people, however I don't give people shit either. I treat everyone with respect unless they have given me a reason to do otherwise. Ime, sexually…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 05:37 PM
2

I would not consent to sex with someone who didn't have basic, adult capacities to communicate. Likewise, I would feel very violated if someone were to sneak such a situation on me because I want nothing to do with any sexual situation that does not involve fully capable and consenting adults. This.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 05:24 PM
1

Yes, in the example I gave the way that consent is being affirmed enthusiastically is non-verbal. The awareness of reciprocity (which indicates consent) is how you're affirming that it's there. Yeah I do this naturally as well as most people I hope. Like I said, you don't have to do this verbally every step of the way. I know that and affirmative consent doesn't say that either it leaves room for plenty of nonverbal communication. You might want to check out the new consent standard that should …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 05:21 PM
1

I don't have time to read this all atm, but ensuring that there is enthusiastic consent at each step of the way isn't about explicitly asking 'do you consent?' all the time. I know that, thank god...no one would ever actually want to do that man or woman. It's about being aware of your partner's response and level of engagement. If someone fades away in the middle of sex (ie goes blank and limp) or gets sad and start crying, or looks like they're in pain, you take account of that and check in wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 05:06 PM
0

I don't think you really comprehend what I'm saying tbh. These unattractive guys will be avoiding women altogether. They won't want to get married or have children. These women will want a relationship and they won't so that's that. They could get laid here and there as you say but they probably won't care to with 25-35+ post wall hags. When they can fap or use sexbots that look like they're in their prime they won't have to or want to. If you're correct, most of these guys will still end up mar…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 04:40 PM
23

You ever hear how women say one thing then proceed to do another...actions speak louder than words.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 04:10 PM
7

So true.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 04:04 PM
8

We're better looking and much more alpha than our beta bluepill counterparts. Also better in bed as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 04:02 PM
3

I tell all men to never get married or have children it's not worth it and they're just liability anyway. Get in shape, get to a low bodyfat percentage, take care of your skin, and if you're bald or balding buy a hair piece(stfu) and then fuck women at your leisure. Don't swallow the "I like bald guys" and "I like dad bods" blue pill, no they don't. Women want guys with thick full heads of hair between 8-12% bodyfat with cut six pack abs, preferably between 5'11"-6'2". This is a fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 04:00 PM
3

Young men are checking out, this is the primary reason. Women are actually usually looking for a boyfriend and almost need one for the validation from what I've observed, by and large it's mostly young millennial gamers and men who normally have been betas that are checking out. Now going off of the 80/20 rule, that's 80% of young men potentially checking out of pursuing women. Women won't pursue those men because they don't pursue at all its not in their nature. So they get depressed and get pu…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 03:30 PM
3

Young men are checking out, this is the primary reason. Women are actually usually looking for a boyfriend and almost need one for the validation from what I've observed, by and large it's mostly young millennial gamers and men who normally have been betas that are checking out. Now going off of the 80/20 rule, that's 80% of young men potentially checking out of pursuing women. Women won't pursue those men because they don't pursue at all its not in their nature. So they get depressed and get pu…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 03:23 PM
2

I'm with you on this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 03:11 PM
1

Eh, I don't think it kills the moment. You don't think asking for consent every kiss or every thrust ruins sex? You're literally advocating for making men ask for consent each and every move they make...at least that's what it sounds like. How many times does it take to "ensure enthusiastic consent" from you perspective? Under affirmative consent they will only have to "ask" once. As asking can also be nonverbal through either conduct, or body language. Tbh, I having sex that isn't 'enthusiastic…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 03:08 PM
1

I don't assume all men are abusive. That's good seeing as how most men aren't for the most part, same with the fact that not all women want to divorce rape their husband, or have children that aren't biologically his...but pass them off as his own anyway. It happens, but it's rare. But most RPers, yeah. I wouldn't say that either, but I would say that most abusive men would find TRP resonates with them for sure, and I would agree that their a much more abusive men on the TRP side than the BP sid…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 02:49 PM
7

But that is not an unambiguous verbal withdrawal of consent Withdrawal of consent doesn't have to be and shouldn't have to be verbal IMO. However it should be REAL FUCKING OBVIOUS non verbally, like crying or icing up fully as you describe for instance.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/16 06:45 PM
1

Being biologically female.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/16 05:48 PM
–

lucky fucker I'm a 90s kid, so many pussy ass oversensitive teachers growing up
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/16 05:46 PM
1

I think I hurt her feels by asking too many questions.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/16 05:36 PM
–

LOL I hate my generation(I'm in my early 20s) also love your username, great fucking book. Are you a Millennial as well, or Gen x?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/16 05:36 PM
–

"threatening" to rape and kill people too many times to be considered though Lmfao how did that happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/16 07:48 AM
1

I don't want to regulate the bedroom. That's good, I think most every human being and mammal on this planets shares your sentiment, as do I. I do think that people should be considerate of each other. I agree with you here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/16 07:44 AM
1

Why are you calling me sweetheart? It's very patronising, and speaks poorly of your character. It wasn't intended to be patronizing at all. Please stop sending me PM's, too. Sure, will do, could you please answer my questions then? I apologize that you found my answers unsatisfactory You never actually answered any of the questions at all though, you vaguely replied to maybe one or two and you know you did. I just PM'd you 6 questions...give me one sentence answers to each of them and I promise …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/16 07:36 AM
1

I don't have anxiety at all. I enjoy debates and my jimmies are rustled when the person I'm debating with doesn't answer my questions back to them when I answered there's without an issue. Just so you know this is a debate subreddit sweetheart.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/16 06:56 AM
1

Because I wanted to get the supporters of this policy to give me their opinions on how they believe it should work in practice/principle. I'll stop badgering you as soon as you answer those questions. You seem to always reply with one/two sentence answers that completely dodge all of my questions. My apologies if you feel as though I'm badgering you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/16 06:50 AM
1

Holy shit, I'm not anxious about this "law" as it isn't one currently and probably never will be one anyway. What I wanted was your honest opinion about the questions I detailed above and even bolded for you so they were easier to see, despite going back an forth with you numerous times you've yet to answer them at all. This is getting ridiculous...how hard is it to reply to a couple of simple questions about YOUR opinion. I'm not asking you for actual legal advice or about how affirmative conse…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/16 06:48 AM
1

Also I saw /u/atlas_b_shuruggin 's reply and I already responded to that and it was helpful to know that you wouldn't need to ask an endless battery of questions for consensual sex not to be rape in the context of affirmative consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/16 06:45 AM
1

You didn't directly answer the questions...again. I already have a thread going in legal advice offtopic actually about this but I wanted your opinion specifically on the bold questions above which for whatever reason you can't seem to answer directly. Do you always struggle with the concept of Communication. I'm autistic(very high functioning) so yes, thanks for noticing. You see I'm very "mechanical" and prefer direct replies to questions, not open ended ambiguous answers. Could you please dir…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/16 06:43 AM
1

Here you go- 1. Just out of curiosity are you saying here that you expect men to ask...every 5 seconds...2 seconds, minute and half(let me know the frequency that makes a man not a felon and a rapist), if they have your consent to proceed? Do you think nonverbal cues are okay? 2. Do you need a separate verbal agreement for each separate sexual act? 3. How is this regulated in a court of law? 4. How do you reasonably prove you had affirmative consent in the absence of continuous questioning? Hone…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/16 05:06 AM
1

Sure but could you elaborate more on what you mean. For instance do you think it should be illegal for men to have sex with a women and not ask them if everything is okay every ten seconds? Because this is the impression I'm getting from you. How frequently do you believe they need to ask? Once at the beginning? Do you believe nonverbal cues are okay as well, for instance smiling, nodding, or former sexual contact? Would you like it if your husband asked you every time he escalated or touched yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/16 05:01 AM
2

This, a thousand times this. Why do some sexist women assume all men are abusive...or even a significant portion of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/16 04:28 AM
1

How the hell are you going to protect yourself from this? It's garbage and would never hold up in a court of law even with an affirmative consent standard. If the accuser is 18 or over and cannot communicate that they have revoked their prior consent that is their fault men are not mind readers and do not and should not need to acquire enthusiastic consent CONSTANTLY and CONTINUOUSLY throughout a sexual encounter(this would piss of most people I know man and women), so long as any reasonable per…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/16 01:29 AM
1

Good and I agree with you on that point, but you still haven't directly answered any of my questions and I'm really curious as to why that is? You do realize even under affirmative consent you don't have to get consent more than once as long as you have any reasonable person would believe that consent was on going throughout, either due to verbal or nonverbal cues. Could you answer each of my questions directly? Thanks I would greatly appreciate it as I like to hear everyone's opinions so I'm no…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/16 01:21 AM
2

Not when you practice BDSM, engaging in hardcore BDSM without a safeword is fucking retarded and not safe at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/16 10:05 PM
2

Where has this become a criminal law standard? Are you talking UK/Canada or US? Are you sure you're not referring to the college tribunal standard in CA and NY? I hasn't become a criminal law standard anywhere yet and probably won't for another decade or two, or maybe not ever. No one can really answer this question because it's so ambiguous. It's unworkable. It's burden shifting. It alters the definition of rape. I'm a woman and I don't like it because it's anti-defendant's rights and I'm a die…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/16 08:29 PM
2

I agree but I believe some people blow this policy out of proportions and I don't believe it's always as bad as some people make it out to be. If you look at my more recent comments you can see that the affirmative consent standard allows for nonverbal cues and in combination with the reasonable person standard for determining liability it comes down to whether a reasonable person would believe the had the accusers enthusiastic consent, and if this is the case it shouldn't be difficult to prove …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/16 08:25 PM
1

This is what I was hoping it was, as I have no issues with this at all, it's the continuous/on going portion that freaked me out a little bit, plus that South Park episode...lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/16 08:20 PM
2

Affirmative consent (explicit yes) is when both parties agree to sexual conduct, either through clear, verbal communication or nonverbal cues or gestures Yeah this makes me feel much better about the whole thing when combined with the reasonable person standard for determining liability. To obtain affirmative consent, rather than waiting to say or for a partner to say "no," one gives and seeks an explicit "yes." This can come in the form of a smile, a nod or a verbal yes, as long as it's unambig…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/16 08:15 PM
2

If you aren't in a handful of colleges I wouldn't concern myself with it. I'm not concerned with it so much as I'm curious about it, and also there's a chance it may become some kind of legal standard within the next 20 or so years so that's why I was asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/16 08:08 PM
5

I would expect both lovers to engage in a dialogue, as a new lover may not move at the same pace as you. You want both of you to enjoy yourselves, don't you? Sure and with new partners I do like to discuss sexual preferences before hand anyway. You might be experienced and confident, but are they? I will find out before hand their sexual tastes and interests as always, like I said above. As a non lawyer, I can't tell you about what will or won't stand up in court. I imagine that seeking regular,…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/16 12:16 PM
7

Affirmative consent is really just making sure that you're both still on the same page, and both still enjoying yourselves. There's nothing inherently wrong with the premise and this is all well and good. How awful would it be if she changed her mind, but was too frightened or shy to tell you? It's her job to let you know either verbal or non-verbally that consent has been revoked men are not mind readers. Just out of curiosity are you saying here that you expect men to ask...every 5 seconds...2…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/16 11:40 AM
3

Personally I prefer everyone being pretty vocal during sex. Hey, well I presume to each their own. But I don't know if that's actually what the law means, I don't think it says anywhere that nonverbal cues are not acceptable although I'd guess the only way to be 100% sure of a defense in a court of law is to ask in some way. That's my problem with this, it should be written into this sort of policy somewhere that nonverbal cues are acceptable as most couple and people who have sex do so nonverba…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/16 11:09 AM
3

I guess you don't have to ask in such unsexy terms as well, go with a "yeah you like that?" rather than a "do I have your consent to continue" But you do have to ask, no? I mean how often exactly according to this policy/law? IMO it would ruin sex for alot of people to have to ask/be on the receiving end of an endless battery of questions all the time. Yeah you could ask in "sexy terms", but you shouldn't have to, it should be obvious they like it based on their verbal/nonverbal cues and what no…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/16 10:24 AM
1

I disagree as most college students today that were polled recently support the first amendment and were okay even with "hate speech" being uncensored. Given 40% of those millennials polled supported limiting free speech. The take home here is with more education they favored free speech, not to mention many colleges are female dominant now and more women than men supported the censorship, however the majority of the women still favored full on free speech, even for hate speech. I doubt very muc…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/16 10:08 PM
2

personally beat up ISIS When? He said he will use our military to the fullest extent. still thinks of himself as a great military leader He never said anything like that, and he didn't have other priorities, he had bone spurs.
/r/PussyPass19/05/16 09:24 PM
1

You really hitched your wagon to a great star there! Panders and Shillary are pieces of shit, and in all likely hood he probably did actually have bone spurs, and those yearly student deferments are standard as I said before, it's what a ton of men at the time did while in college.
/r/PussyPass19/05/16 01:33 AM
3

But "Captain" Trump never served a single day in actual uniform, even though his nation was at war and over 55,000 American boys lost their lives at the average age of 19 years old. Yes, he was medically discharged as I stated before. You claimed he skipped out on the draft, which he didn't. Stop being disingenuous and simply tell the truth as it is. Given his medical reason wasn't entirely awful, he was medically discharged none the less. I say again - HE DID NOT SKIP OUT ON THE DRAFT "MULTIPLE…
/r/PussyPass18/05/16 09:00 PM
2

Donald Trump was in the military and was medically discharged, you disingenuous dimwit. I won't excuse my language because I call them like I see them, and you're a fucking retard.
/r/PussyPass18/05/16 05:27 PM
10

I think in France or somewhere in Europe it's illegal to get a paternity test on a kid at the hospital. Yes, and many people bitch about this even some feminazis believe it or not. Delaying until her period and then nexting or just nexting now will have the same result, her false claim of paternity will haunt you until you can get a blood or saliva sample of the baby. Actually the guy does have a decent point here about waiting. A false claim of paternity is laughable in the USA so long as you d…
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 08:38 PM
1

Well good luck to you, and I hope he pays you, some guys try to weasel out of it. I've always felt child support was very much justified, children are expensive and take time to raise properly. I would also draw up a custody agreement as I would want to be a proper parent to my kids.
/r/RedPillWomen19/12/14 06:11 PM
1

Lol.
/r/RedPillWomen19/12/14 05:30 PM
1

Would you have kids before getting married?
/r/RedPillWomen19/12/14 05:30 PM
0

Yup, if I ever have kids this is how I'm doing it. Non-Marital cohabitation agreement, No joint accounts, and custody agreement. Given things didn't work out, I would be fine paying child support, and helping her out if she needs it for a little while.
/r/RedPillWomen19/12/14 05:30 PM
1

If I continue to live in America I'm opting for a girl number 3. Who wants an LTR, but no kids, or marriage. What country to you live in where it's fair?
/r/RedPillWomen19/12/14 05:18 PM
2

Yes, basically, however after seeing the responses I've garnered from both AskTRP and TRPWomen, I've opted out of ever wanting to have a child. Not really worth it, imo. Not that I wanted one to begin with, I was asking just encase I ever changed my mind. So I guess I side with women that don't want marriage or children.
/r/RedPillWomen19/12/14 05:15 PM
2

No kids for me then, lol. Fuck that.
/r/askTRP19/12/14 05:07 PM
3

....If you can get the milk for free :)
/r/askTRP19/12/14 03:50 PM
-2

I think there's no reason to feel as though a married environment is any different than a committed ltr, mother, father environment other than the titles "Husband and Wife" and the rings. There has to be one women on here who feels the same way...family without marriage?
/r/RedPillWomen19/12/14 03:48 PM
-4

I wouldn't be her husband though, as I have no intention of ever getting married. She would be taking an enormous risk if she did decide to be a stay at home mom no doubt. I would have no problem helping her get back on her feet if it didn't work out. Also prenups usually are thrown out, and don't count for much. I would feel much safer if we were never married, had no joint accounts, etc.
/r/RedPillWomen19/12/14 03:25 PM
0

Yeah that's another thing, I have to make sure we aren't common law married as well. Probably draw up a non-marital cohabitation agreement of sorts. There has to be a few women out there opposed to marriage, but for children and a solid monogamous committed LTR. Surprised I'm not seeing many on here.
/r/RedPillWomen19/12/14 02:19 PM
0

I don' think it's worth the risk, even if I'm marrying a Mother Theresa type personality. I would much rather have a solid family unit without marriage, and I just hope I can find a girl with the same mindset.
/r/RedPillWomen19/12/14 02:14 PM
1

Also it doesn't matter the judge has to allow the video/audio into evidence even if it is illegally recorded, this is done often to prove innocence in these kinds of cases.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/14 01:23 AM
1

Also if this is the case, then you would no longer be charged of rape but an illegal video recording. However they would also be in trouble for filing a clearly false rape claim, and thus you could sue them in civil court for defamation, etc...or you could come to an agree and not get each other into trouble and drop the crime entirely and then you're free to go for the video recording. So you may not even need consent.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/14 12:43 AM
1

You must've missed the part of the post where I mentioned these cameras would run 24/7, with the led date signs. There's absolutely no way in hell you could be accused if you have everything on video/audio and their consent. If they ask to prove the date and time is accurate just simply dial back the video/audio feed as far to the point where you set it up and watch it advance...ideally you would have months of footage of people coming in and out of the house, without ever mentioning that the da…
/r/TheRedPill16/12/14 12:34 AM
1

Nope, if you let them know, and also have a sign up and you have it on video. Then you can prove their consent and they cannot do shit about it.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/14 12:31 AM
2

Yep. That and you could let them know, and just make up some ridiculous reason behind your recording everything(audio + video) 24/7. You could also put a sign on the door that reads "By entering this area you are agreeing to being under constant 24/7 audio-video surveillance"...."smile for the camera."
/r/TheRedPill16/12/14 12:30 AM
3

Yes, this. I'm young and will be hooking up with girls around my own age. I'm only taking necessary precautions.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/14 06:57 PM
7

This is a stroke of genius bro. Thank you for this idea.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/14 06:53 PM
1

This is entertaining for read, but a the same time horrifying. How can they think this is okay? Where the fuck do they even come up with this bullshit?
/r/TheRedPill14/12/14 04:38 PM
0

Wearing the rug is me bro. Don't call me fucked up for doing so. I do what I want, and what I think looks good when I look in the mirror.
/r/askTRP01/12/14 08:01 PM
-1

Meh idgaf, I'll wear a rug if I think it looks good, maybe go total shaved some other days if its uncomfortable. I do know the ones they make nowadays look good/totally real, and some real men like to have hair on their head. cough Wes Welker cough
/r/askTRP01/12/14 05:04 PM
–

Hey thanks bro. I think I missed the whole point of TRP initially and I'm beginning to understand. I shouldn't give a fuck what they say, or what anyone says and I should just do what I want to do. Fuck it, I know I can pull it off and they look legit, so why not? Also about the age thing I couldn't agree more. I think I'll be wearing the hair piece well into my 30's and 40's as well though if it looks good. I'm not gonna be sporting it all the time though, I've heard the shit can get itchy, I'm…
/r/askTRP
–

Wow, after reading my own post. The need for external validation is real. Fuck.
/r/askTRP
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter