TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Melkor7410 Archive

View 0 posts and 426 comments by Melkor7410 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Better to do it now than wait until the decision is made for you. It's a lot easier to find a job while you have a job.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 12:03 AM
2

OK?
/r/MensRights14/05/26 01:27 PM
7

Would you not be able to do this through medical labs, where the only part that's released to the courts is the positive / negative result? Why would you have to submit yours and your child's DNA directly to the courts?
/r/MensRights13/05/26 09:17 PM
79

I doubt the government is doing the DNA test. I don't know the procedures, but I imagine you are just submitting DNA samples to medical labs, and it just comes back as you are the father, or you aren't, and that's what the government gets. I'd be *really* surprised if you had to submit the DNA to the government directly.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 09:16 PM
11

One interesting note, is they had a page called https://democrats.org/who-we-are/who-we-serve/ that listed all the groups they served. They included women in that list. But men were nowhere to be found. I noticed they have since removed it. But it's still found here: https://web.archive.org/web/20250615042752/https://democrats.org/who-we-are/who-we-serve/
/r/MensRights18/12/25 12:01 PM
1

Done. My comment still stands. Maybe be more specific.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 10:28 AM
0

Nowhere did the comment say they automatically think it's misandrist?
/r/MensRights24/10/25 08:19 PM
11

The DA probably was pushing to trial to get a plea deal more than thinking they could convict. Most defendants plea out even if there's not much evidence, so it's wrong to assume the DA thought they had enough evidence to convict.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 05:13 PM
15

The burden of proof is usually much less in a civil case than a criminal case. Criminal cases usually require a unanimous decision to convict, where as a civil case only requires a majority (sometimes a simple majority, sometimes slightly higher, depending on the state). So there is a chance that while OP could have enough evidence for a civil conviction. The biggest example of this is the OJ Simpson trials. He got found not guilty criminally, but guilty civilly.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 04:38 PM
68

It would be a lot of upfront cost from OP, pretty big burden or proof as OP would have to show proof of harm as a direct result from the accusation. I'd have to look at how often it is successful but if OP doesn't have a lot of money, could OP even afford to do it?
/r/MensRights31/01/25 01:12 PM
2

The book was even better.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 12:01 PM
7

You forgot trauma boners. Getting an erection from severe trauma is pretty common (at least that's what the paramedic was saying that did my trauma first aid training).
/r/MensRights18/07/24 12:20 PM
4

I literally said, the same thing does not happen in reverse, and that society and the law says it's right. I never said what I think.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 03:28 PM
1

The law still says slavery is right, at least in the US. The 13th amendment did not outlaw slavery. However, my point was the law and society says it's right. Not sure why you said 'And?' since that was my literal point.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 03:17 PM
14

You may think it's wrong, but the law and society in general says it's right.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 02:49 PM
86

Then how come the same thing is not said when a girl lies to a guy about being older? He's still arrested for statutory rape, there is no defense for it.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 01:50 PM
1

All I asked for was a citation, not claiming there aren't any.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 05:57 PM
1

Seeing it yourself is an anecdote however, so claiming there is a higher proportion in this generation requires an actual study. Basing a claim on an anecdote is just spreading misinformation, and hurts the Men's Rights cause.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 04:32 PM
10

I am saying I see a higher proportion of mentally unwell and narcissistic women this generation than prior ones Care to cite your study proving this?
/r/MensRights03/01/24 01:27 PM
6

I was not saying that LOW was about him, just saying that the character was based on him more than any other person, but that character is an amalgamation of many people. Even if we say that the guy is not bad, the point is that the US was willing to trade a person who they thought was really bad, to free a woman who literally broke Russian law, when there are in fact innocent men in Russia that have been imprisoned without a semblance of due process.
/r/MensRights08/12/23 10:01 PM
95

Not only was she released, but an illegal arms dealer named Viktor Bout was released in order to get her out. This guy was the main person that the character in Lord of War was based on. His nickname is the Merchant of Death. Apparently releasing a woman WHO ACTUALLY BROKE RUSSIAN LAW was so important that we had to release the Merchant of Death. She wasn't wrongfully convicted or forced to sign a confession, she possessed drugs that are illegal in Russia. Edit: fixed half-sentence.
/r/MensRights08/12/23 03:00 PM
2

I actually do agree that men in domestic violence situations should just leave. So you should just leave your kids with a known abuser? You should give up your rights to your own home? What if you have no support network? Shelters won't take you, so where do you go?
/r/MensRights06/12/23 08:51 PM
1

that men were getting injured and raped by women Ah but see, a lot of places don't consider non-consensual sex with a man as rape; there's only rape if the victim is penetrated. They often call it made-to-penetrate instead of rape. If you weren't aware of that, were you also aware that male victims of rape (or being made to penetrate, or whatever) are also made to pay child support? Even of the male victim is underage. So the male victim cannot abort the pregnancy like a female victim could (I k…
/r/MensRights04/12/23 01:46 PM
8

That form does not prove she didn't revoke consent during the act. So while it may have started consensual, it didn't end consensually, or at least that'll be the claim. And these forms do nothing to stop that. Plus, she could argue that she was coerced into signing it or some such. Same could be said for signing a form after-the-fact. I personally think these forms won't do anything.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 07:12 PM
3

Don't make excuses for her terrible behavior. You are a DV victim. I hope you've been able to come to terms with what happened to you and have been able to move on.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 05:04 PM
1

Ah yes, the 'No true Scotsman' fallacy.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 02:11 PM
2

Maybe she tampered with the rubber. Maybe she coerced him while he was drunk (it's rape when a guy does that to a girl, but probably not considered rape the other way around). Or as many stories we've seen, maybe an adult female (like a teacher) got an underage boy to have sex with her (like a student) and she's pregnant and makes him pay child support (this actually happens).
/r/MensRights18/10/23 09:06 PM
3

What exactly are the 'competing' for that makes them poor if they don't 'win'? It's not like you get a prize for spending the most money or something. It's not like a married couple having a higher household income would make an otherwise successful single person 'poor'.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 10:47 AM
161

It's been shown that the highest earnings are single women. It's also been shown that 70% of consumer spending is women. So I wonder how much of their financial woes are caused by overspending?
/r/MensRights09/10/23 07:22 PM
21

That's not at all what you first said. You said a flat out lie for one, that women are forced to choose between career or family. No one is forcing them for one. And for two, you are completely disregarding the sacrifices men make too, as shown in multiple comments.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 04:42 PM
15

You're right, if there is no global solution to something, we should never propose anything. Let's just stop everything. Or you know, come up with a local, state, or national solution first and expand from there.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 04:39 PM
16

That's not a real solution, that's just a wish list. Come up with a real, actionable solution.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 04:34 PM
2

Except that a lawyer that is licensed to practice in your locality has a fiduciary responsibility to you, unlike these other redditors. They (licensed lawyers) are legally obligated to do what's in your best interest, which is what a fiduciary agreement is. That doesn't protect you from incompetence, but it is something. Regarding comments about getting other party to pay your legal fees, you generally have to sue for that. At the very least, talk to the judge about that as you are extremely tig…
/r/MensRights03/10/23 11:27 AM
3

You're also most likely to be murdered (as a woman) by your husband, and after that, it's men you know. Not strangers, like the OP was. Also, do you honestly thing I'm not (or less) afraid of a man because of strength? Strength doesn't do shit against a knife or a gun.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 11:07 AM
6

What does that have to do with anything? Men still have to fear being murdered more.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 02:17 PM
8

As of 2020, 82% of murder victims are male... so a man is far more likely to be murdered. As of 2021, victims of violent crime in general (murder, rape, sexual assault, robbery, and assault) 53.3% were male. So men go through slightly more violent crime as victims, and like 4.5x more murders. Men have as much or more to fear as women do. And OP can still feel like it's weird that he's being perceived as a violent criminal wherever he goes. Especially since she was literally chatting with him all…
/r/MensRights25/09/23 12:25 PM
55

A friend of mine spent 6 figures to get custody of his girls. Still didn't get it. Men want it, we just don't get it.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 02:38 PM
2

You need to talk to a divorce lawyer. I'm not familiar with GA divorce law, but the laws vary greatly between states. My state, AFAIK, assets and debt you had prior to the marriage stays separate. Assets that were separate but money went into them (like a house) after marriage, you'd have to split the value of the assets that was contributed to after marriage. Cheating doesn't affect who gets what, it's a 50/50 split of marital assets regardless. Since this is contested, it'll get messy and expe…
/r/MensRights30/08/23 05:26 PM
10

I'd have responded to that like, well you're a strong independent woman, you don't need a man to fight your battles for you! I know you can do it honey, you got this! But I'm sure the way I react to things was part of why my first marriage ended in divorce.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 12:04 PM
2

Just remember that once a divorce is on the table, it takes your marriage / relationship and reduces it to a business transaction. Remove as much emotion from this as possible. Find a friend or friends, men's support group, pastor, rabbi, someone that you can talk to about all the emotional aspects of this that is NOT your attorney or soon-to-be ex. Remove emotion as much as possible from the divorce. You will need to find ways to compromise on splitting assets, but don't give it in all at once,…
/r/MensRights29/08/23 11:32 AM
2

Based on what I read, 8 states still have it as they basically always did, 2 two states have it restricted. Plus I didn't see anything in OP's post that was US-specific so I didn't want to assume.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 08:07 PM
1

I was working on the stats you provide in the text is all, to see how it related to the UN states even when they included sexual slavery as child solder. So even with sexual slavery, it didn't match their 40%.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 05:12 PM
1

I saw a total of 13,740 kids (adding the boys and girls for all bullet points). Then I added all the girl stats, and got 3,630. Divide 3,630 by 13,740 and I got 0.264192, rounded to 26.4%. Did I miss something? Edit: I worked with the figures in the bullet points you put in your post, I didn't review PDFs.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 03:33 PM
1

So with the numbers you posted, the total for girls is 26.4%, which fits within the original 10 - 30% estimate, but 13.6% below the 40% cited by the UN now.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 01:35 PM
21

Many localities have laws that say if you two are living together and acting as married (and I'd argue a civil ceremony is acting as married), then you become legally married (usually called a common law marriage but there are different terms in different localities) after a set amount of time living like that. Then you'll have all the same legal ramifications as if you had gotten married to begin with. Plus if you have kids, child support is completely independent of marriage.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 01:25 PM
3

How many songs are there about women busting up a partner's truck / house / property / whatever because they caught them cheating? Resorting to physical violence is OK for women, and celebrated apparently.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 12:55 PM
13

There are a lot of places where if you live like a married couple, you will legally be considered married (common law marrige is the typical term), and she would have the same rights to shared property etc. Not to mention, married or not, she can still take you for child support. Child support is independent of marriage / alimony.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 11:32 AM
24

Came here to say exactly this. It was meant to show the absolute ridiculousness of people saying the boy is lucky. South Park is an equal opportunity offender. The one area I think they are total sellouts was the whole 'censoring Muhammad' thing. The super best friends episode showed Muhammad, and they make fun of all religions, yet suddenly they're supposed to cater to one religion because some people from that religion overreact?
/r/MensRights23/08/23 07:30 PM
6

Not true. If OP lives in a location that has common law marriage, OP could end up being "married" that way without really knowing it.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 02:08 PM
2

Not just a will. There's also the default ability to make calls on medical issues when the person is incapacitated, making financial decisions if they are not of sound mind (like end of life decisions), being able to share health insurance (at least in the US), and I'm sure some other things. But doing a medical power of attorney and all that is definitely not cheaper than getting a JOP marriage. Also, I believe that a gay couple would have an easier time adopting children than two unmarried gay…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 11:51 AM
2

I feel like responding by checking your watch again, maybe while staring at her, would make your point. Who knows.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 12:28 PM
7

Good summary. To clarify a bit, I am the one that put together this plan and put it in action. My wife thought it was weird at first but I've talked with her and she has no doubt that there's women that make false accusations, so she said she'd make sure to help me with this as I've requested. She's one of the good ones.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 06:15 PM
48

I've already told my wife that if another woman (one of her friends, mother of one of my daughters' friends, or my daughters' friends) is at our house, she needs to be at our house too. And that I will not be alone in a room with them. She gave me a weird look when I first discussed it, but agreed none-the-less. I have a few very long term friends (some of them I've known longer than my wife) that I may not enforce this, but otherwise this is the rule.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 12:30 PM
3

I assume you mean the single lid down, which necessitates having the seat down too. And yes, the lid should be down, completely negating the argument.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 07:12 PM
1

Arranged marriages aren't forced. Both parties still must agree to it.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 06:05 PM
10

Unless you change the definition of racism: https://www.voanews.com/a/student-union_why-merriam-webster-changed-definition-racism/6191215.html
/r/MensRights29/06/23 05:55 PM
32

Seems like almost every time I comment on Reddit, I get a notification that I've been followed by a user, I check out that user info, and it's an OF girl with zero post or comment history.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 02:29 PM
1

The age by which the child can choose varies by state. OP's only option is to get a lawyer. No idea why they're asking in here and not a lawyer.
/r/MensRights23/05/23 07:05 PM
4

Got a flash back of 'How to cook people' ... 'How to cook for people' ... 'How to cook forty people' etc...
/r/MensRights18/05/23 10:55 AM
3

Idk what kind of school let's this happen. All of them?
/r/MensRights15/05/23 12:44 PM
17

Well the Mars trip, the balls to go on such a long, and most likely one-way trip. Help is 1+ years away.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 07:35 PM
2

A skill you'll need to learn no matter where you go is just how to interact with people, and how to do public speaking (basically meeting people in public can be treated this way). This may seem unconventional, but try joining a local Toast Masters and just learning it. There's a book called 'I Have Something to Say: Mastering the Art of Public Speaking' by John Bowe, who talks about a cousin who was a total introvert, and ended up finding someone and marrying her at age 59. And his cousin didn'…
/r/MensRights04/05/23 07:40 PM
2

Judges tend to believe those who have the most meticulous notes / logs. This is true for any type of case like this (DV, child custody, etc).
/r/MensRights04/05/23 03:50 PM
22

There's a difference between not receiving praise, and actually being shit on though. A lot of the time they're actively shitting on dads.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 08:36 PM
40

We should care about false information used to push agendas. We should be pushing for honest numbers.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 05:39 PM
2

Oh I wasn't saying to go ahead and apologize, I agree that nothing should be said once things turn negative. Just seeing that reminded me that I believe they actually passed a law in Canada around that, not for false accusations specifically, but for anything.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 06:32 PM
4

Apology is taken as admission of guilt Wasn't there a ruling in Canada that it's NOT an admission of guilt, because Canadians would apologize so much?
/r/MensRights17/04/23 05:36 PM
19

I believe this is called the pussy pass. But men are privileged of course.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 12:03 PM
5

I find the response from that other man to be more disgusting. He's so thirsty he could never envision a scenario where he wouldn't want to have sex? That's kind of sad.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 10:55 AM
1

It depends entirely on their relationship. If your SO has no issues with you getting a lap dance, then you shouldn't have issues with them getting a lap dance. If they have an issue with you getting one, they shouldn't get one. We don't know the parameters of their relationship. If the boyfriend goes to strip clubs, then he shouldn't have broken up with her about it. If the expectation she has of him is not accepting any dances from girls, then he should. Maybe it's a bit more nuanced, but that'…
/r/MensRights28/03/23 01:53 PM
6

I don't know a single man that this hasn't happened to.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 12:18 PM
90

Did they physically grab you? What would have happened if you refused to leave? I sure wouldn't have left, tell them that they can fucking wait.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 12:00 PM
12

If it's a single toilet restroom, and the men's is occupied and the women's door is open, lights off, obviously unoccupied, I'll use theirs. If it's a multi-toilet restroom where it'd be impossible to tell it's unoccupied, I don't. I would have a problem with women using a men's room if the men's room is occupied. And if there is a woman or women in the men's room, no other men, I'd probably avoid using it until their done (risk of false accusation seems high in that scenario).
/r/MensRights22/03/23 11:59 AM
61

Ah, so in software development terms, it's a feature not a bug.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 02:55 PM
2

Yes. I should have added, learn about, look for, and recognize signs of abuse from your partner. Leave them as soon as possible if that happens. The longer you stay, the more you'll revert to thoughts like you deserve it, then it becomes *very* hard to leave. Thanks for the reply.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 10:32 AM
95

Wrap it up, always. Never date or go near crazy. If crazy was hiding, leave as soon as you find out it's crazy. Don't change yourself to impress others. None of these are age-specific.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 05:07 PM
7

Also, *never* talk to the police. If they come to ask you questions, the only two acceptable responses are: I won't answer any questions without a lawyer present, or Please submit your questions in writing, I will review with my lawyer and get back to you at a later time. Say. Nothing. Else. "I'm sure glad my client talked to the police before talking to me," said no lawyer ever.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 12:05 PM
9

In addition to the comment that /u/EmirikolWoker wrote, I want to add that if a man is raped (or sexually assaulted or whatever it's called since most places, a woman can't rape a man (or boy)), he has exactly zero options, and his rapist can even go after him for child support. The only options mentioned in the other comment for men would apply for consensual sex. If you are not in a committed relationship, and you want kids in the future, a vasectomy would be out of the question (since there's…
/r/MensRights10/03/23 01:22 PM
1

Considering that the primary definition of female as a noun IS human, I just don't get it. I take no offense to male. To me, it just appears as people are choosing to be offended when none is required.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 11:41 AM
3

Maybe the high failure rate is why other men don't go.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 10:25 PM
8

Based on another comment in here, 80% of men that committed suicide and were in therapy, the therapy failed to identify that they were suicidal. That seems like a pretty big failure.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 09:43 PM
14

Therapy failed 80% of suicidal men who did seek therapy. They'd have better odds of flipping a quarter, heads they go, tails they stay. You know your therapy sucks when a coin flip does a better job. Edit: I also meant to say, for me at least, any type of therapy, I would want to talk to someone who can related to my issues in some way. I don't know how I'd get that from a female therapist. But a group of men in a support group type of setting, that to me would have far more benefit.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 09:40 PM
10

Not to mention it makes light of a very serious situation of someone getting black eyes from an actual domestic violence situation.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 05:14 PM
13

I don't think it'll lead to divorce. There's precedent that women who are the breadwinners will end up paying alimony to the husband's (although still more rare unfortunately) so there's a chance that could happen. Plus if she has contributed more money towards marital assets now, they'll generally split that 50/50 and she'll see it as him taking what's rightfully hers (even tho when roles are reversed, she'd demand 50/50). What will happen is, they'll stay married, he'll continue to be an emoti…
/r/MensRights07/03/23 04:50 PM
2

Divorced/widowed men were more likely to remarry or have an interest in remarrying. Probably why is because alimony goes away when you marry, and the majority of alimony recipients are women. So if they get married, they stop getting paid. Edit: as far as windows go, I'd have to see whether the SS death benefit goes away when getting married. I know a woman who won't remarry because she would still get the SS benefit from her ex husband (at least that's the reason she states).
/r/MensRights07/03/23 12:12 PM
1

Well I am a very technical person, so for me, adhering to standards is the best way I know to respect someone. Fluidity to the point of taking offense at what is, according to THE language standard, a perfectly acceptable term, just causes me to basically give up on the conversation at this point. It's just how I work. Maybe it means I'm on some type of spectrum, who knows. But no intent to offend, and using a term according to the language standard as laid out by an authoritative body (didn't t…
/r/MensRights07/03/23 11:46 AM
4

I wouldn't discuss reasons for a breakup beyond a basic reason, and leave it alone after that. No need to justify anything, because they don't have a right to your time or body. The more you try to justify something, the more they think you are lying or hiding or deceiving them, and just creates more issues. With regards to friends, unfortunately the only solution is to try to find new friends. It sucks, but there are different levels of friends. Only ones that are real, true, deep friends would…
/r/MensRights06/03/23 07:58 PM
2

It's not the lawyers that's the issue but the judges throwing out prenups that's the issue.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 01:44 PM
2

Such a bullshit response. If you look at the noun definition of female on merriam webster, the first definition is 'a female person: a woman or a girl.' How is that offensive? The adjective definition has a few definitions, but one of them is having a gender identity that is the opposite of male, and another is designed for or typically used by girls or women. Seriously, if people choose to be offended by a term, that's not your fault when you are using the term exactly how it's defined.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 01:43 PM
3

Don't feed the trolls.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 01:40 PM
6

Something else that's interesting, when college classes started being remote, attractive women suddenly weren't getting grades as high as they used to.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 09:47 PM
3

Probably the same reason they didn't take into account the draft when demanding the right to vote.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 07:27 PM
12

I believe East Germany was one of the most surveilled societies up until the internet age at least.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 05:35 PM
2

Yeah, but how many would use that method just because they feel like there's no hope but are innocent? It's all a complex matter. With the way the US legal system bullies people, it wouldn't surprise me in the least of people would just opt out because of feeling hopeless, regardless of guilt.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 05:31 PM
5

Women make a higher wage, but on average earn less over their lifetime because they work less on average over their lifetime. I believe single women have the highest average wage.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 05:04 PM
1

I know this didn't take place in the US, but in the US it costs tax payers more to sentence someone to death than it does for life imprisonment, FWIW.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 04:55 PM
3

I don't even know what qualifies as a neutral topic at work anymore. There's always someone that seems to get offended by just about any topic.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 01:51 PM
10

Yes, very sad. Men have no reproductive rights at all. All men can do is try to stay away from women like this. But even in the case of rape (sorry, unwanted touching or whatever it's called, men can't be "raped" apparently) men have no reproductive rights, no ability to force an abortion or do a financial abortion. Instead, men must pay child support to their rapists (sorry, person that touched them unwanted) even if they were a minor when it happened.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 07:32 PM
3

Only thing I can think of is stop giving any girl like this the time of day, but unless most men will do it, she'll find some other man to trap.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 07:29 PM
19

Given her behavior, if he had used condoms, she'd have poked holes in them most likely. Which again, if a man does that, rape. If a woman does it, oh well the man should've known better (or something equally stupid).
/r/MensRights14/02/23 07:02 PM
1

Yeah iron man rings a bell, pipper was the smart one tony was a moron. Maybe an emotional moron, but he's definitely not portrayed as a moron. Smart as shit engineer billionaire that just builds a particle accelerator in his basement and creates a new stable super heavy element. That's not a moron (as much as you have to suspend critical thinking for this to happen anyway).
/r/MensRights13/02/23 04:20 PM
6

Upvoted, because TikTok is terrible.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 01:23 PM
5

Came here to mention this too.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 01:22 PM
1

Aren't they owned by FB? And yes, I don't want to have to have social media to protect myself and my rights.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 03:11 PM
1

You can recommend an automated backup app that uploads to the cloud (preferably as you are recording)? One that works on Android without being tied to a social media app like FB? By automated, I mean doesn't require any manual action while I'm recording it.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 03:09 PM
1

Livestream it using... what? I refuse to have FB on my phone (nor have I logged into it at all in probably 2 years). YouTube doesn't let you stream unless you have a large enough channel. What allows me to live stream that isn't a tracking app like FB?
/r/MensRights10/02/23 03:08 PM
1

How does this not have more upvotes?
/r/MensRights08/02/23 04:21 PM
0

There's also the false positive rate to think about. What would happen if you get a false positive? Would you start divorce proceedings, not sign the birth certificate, etc.? There has to be a way to compensate for false positives here.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 06:44 PM
4

Then what was your point with the quote in response to where the story had been banned to cover? They literally quoted the article, saying a publication ban. You are getting pissed about quoting a CBC article.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 03:48 PM
3

That rape requires penetration, and isn't just a matter of lack of consent. So now, men aren't raped, and all rape statistics are automatically skewed towards women. Plus, if a woman gets pregnant from the rape (sorry, non-consensual touching or whatever), she can sue him for child support (which now touches on your point).
/r/MensRights03/02/23 02:30 PM
71

Not to mention she can't "press charges" and the gym is not liable anyway. Assuming they have security cameras, that'll cover their ass. It's unfortunate they just roll over.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 04:38 PM
6

Not always the best choice: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5687477/Ex-husband-ordered-pay-child-support-former-wife-forged-signature-undergo-IVF.html
/r/MensRights19/01/23 05:24 PM
5

Posted it on a Men's rights sub. This sub is not exclusive to men, and for me it's interesting to see the other side of getting a vasectomy, especially with "my body, my choice" being the feminist mantra.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 05:23 PM
4

Unless you audio record the entire interaction from start to finish (and have her consent to do so in two party states), the recording will mean nothing. Because she can revoke (or said she revoked) consent at any time during the act, and unless you record the entire thing, you have no proof.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 02:04 PM
11

Signing a consent form means zero and wouldn't be difficult at all to throw it out. Consent is not a one-time, fixed thing. You can sign the form and then revoke consent 30 seconds later. Or she could claim there was coercion to sign the form rendering it void anyway. Etc.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 02:03 PM
19

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksqgKZfEfNM
/r/MensRights17/01/23 08:20 PM
3

What I like to know is, how is drugging an raping a minor not a serious crime?
/r/MensRights17/01/23 02:38 PM
9

I can't speak for other men, but I can't cross my legs unless it's ankle on knee. Trying to cross a knee over the other, no way I can sit like that.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 01:27 PM
10

AFAIK they don't, but because my friend was hiding as much of this from the grandparents kids as possible. But I haven't talked to his girls in years so maybe they do now. Edit: typo
/r/MensRights11/01/23 04:20 PM
52

Unfortunately it's become a game of who has the most money. My friend lost both of his kids to the grandparents (he made some mistakes at first by basically allowing his kids to establish a life at the grandparents). The grandparents are the parents of his ex wife, who was in drug rehab. He spent over 100k in lawyers fighting this, never ever got more than visitation, and his oldest is now over 18 so it's a moot point. He's lucky enough that he had enough money to spend that without going bankru…
/r/MensRights11/01/23 03:26 PM
5

I understand that there is a gap in female sports with revenue Which is an issue women can solve themselves without men. Women are bigger consumers than men are, and there are as many (if not slightly more) women than men. Women could be providing huge revenue streams to women's sports.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 03:41 PM
0

No physical injury is required for it to be assault. Law students should know this.
/r/MensRights04/01/23 07:34 PM
0

It comes down to whether a reasonable person (including women) would consider that grabbing her wrist after an argument would have a reasonable belief that an assault could happen. Yes, if you touch my shoulder because I dropped my wallet, and you are getting my attention for the first time, a reasonable person would not assume that physical harm could happen. But grabbing someone's wrist after arguing with them, I can absolutely see that as a reasonable belief that harm could follow.
/r/MensRights04/01/23 07:28 PM
0

Unwanted touching is assault. She clearly didn't want you touching. Not sure what's hard to understand.
/r/MensRights04/01/23 07:01 PM
1

Sorry, but you should never touch anyone unless you have permission. If someone touched me, especially after an argument, I would have a serious problem with that.
/r/MensRights04/01/23 07:00 PM
-1

You shouldn't have touched her. That is assault. Just let her walk away if she's going to be childish.
/r/MensRights04/01/23 01:02 PM
13

Reporting rates also matter. If woman on man DV is reported less, then the statistics will be skewed if you use official reports. Like how a lot of places don't count something as rape unless there is forced penetration. By that logic, women *cant* rape men, therefore men suffer no rape from women at all, and wow the stats show that women are raped so much more than men! There's a lot to this.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 09:56 PM
9

I believe most assault happens from people who you do know, however.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 05:17 PM
36

Don't lesbian couples have the most DV of any type of couple?
/r/MensRights27/12/22 03:25 AM
9

You wouldnt get drunk at a conference Depends on the conference. I've been to plenty of hacker conferences, lots of drinking.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 10:04 PM
8

Action. Ban people who make those jokes, don't just say not to make them. Ban people who say "kill all men" or whatever. Actions are the only way, everything else is just words.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 05:46 PM
2

Cooking and baking for me.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 12:09 PM
2

And it doesn't even apply solely to Trump! A commenter further down posted a YT video of Biden groping women too.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 01:40 PM
12

Yup. Guys get so few compliments, if any at all. And when we do, it really *matters*. I think the total lack of positive interactions that boys can have with girls at a young age, can be what causes a lot of older boys and younger men to react in bad ways when a girl / woman shows him compassion. You've almost exclusively had negative or neutral interactions, then suddenly a girl / woman is saying you look good or are really nice or something, you will think, wow she must really like me, I shoul…
/r/MensRights14/12/22 06:32 PM
6

Unless he meant literally dude rode on a segway to transition to a different point. Then I think segwayed is correct.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 06:22 PM
4

There would have to be protections put in place, but this is the best argument so far I've seen for not making it mandatory. But it could be done to put protections in place, however the funding for that would never be approved. Police aren't even the worst of it. Healthcare companies using the data to exclude coverage for conditions you might have or something (I know not necessarily legal right now under ACA but who knows if those provisions will get gutted in the future).
/r/MensRights12/12/22 09:07 PM
6

Except that if DNA tests are as unreliable as you say, if we start getting huge numbers of false positives, there *will* be demand for more accurate testing, and it'll get solved. Or we just keep doing what we're doing and keep forcing men to care for children that aren't theirs. Not to mention, there can be updates on multiple screenings taken by different individuals, etc. But none of this will happen.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 07:32 PM
8

If a man wants to get a DNA test of his own accord and in his own time though that's a different matter. How is that different if DNA tests are as unreliable as you say? All this does is reduce the total number of false positives / false negatives, it doesn't change anything else.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 06:58 PM
28

At birth, the father should have to option to test . It should not be an option. The reason being, very few men will actually get it done, and be bullied / convinced not to do it. "You don't trust me?" "How could you even think about doing it?!" etc. If you make it mandatory, then it'll be applied equally everywhere.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 06:57 PM
6

Ouch. That burn is so bad I think I felt the heat.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 11:53 AM
9

Except that they actively fought against having to sign up for the draft to be able to vote, so they absolutely didn't want the responsibilities.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 07:42 PM
4

I always try to point out, any time on TV I see a woman hitting a man, is if you reversed genders, would the viewers / audience find this funny acceptable? If not, then it's just the media trying to normalize that men should accept abuse from women.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 06:34 PM
24

Yup, the only outrage is that Susan is a transphobe. Not that she is trying to take a man's suicide and turn it to personal gain, just that Jim was trans so she's a transphobe.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 07:15 PM
9

Fighting for equality has it’s potential risks. That's always been the case though.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 10:08 PM
6

Not to mention any teenager can figure out how to bypass this stuff.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 10:10 PM
27

I think they found that more men get chosen in completely blind studies than studies where the gender would be known (or at least most likely known based on the name). So they had to back-peddle.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 11:51 AM
6

Nothing wrong with asking for a citation of source. It's what keeps a discussion factual.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 02:14 PM
14

There's a few interesting points in this call: She sends an email about talking 1pm "tomorrow" yet says she's only available today. She mentions this on the call. I'd have immediately questioned why she asked about talking tomorrow when she's not available (but I understand not everyone, or even myself, may think about this in the moment). She keeps saying she doesn't want to talk about it yet keeps talking about it. One big hint that there's weird shit going down is this sense of urgency, that …
/r/MensRights11/10/22 04:21 PM
1

Exactly.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 08:13 PM
3

Indeed it was. I didn't think I needed to put sarcasm or joke tags, but oh well.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 04:41 PM
61

If that's a blob fish, you should read up on them. That blob fish sure looks abused (they only look like blobs because they live deep under high pressure, and basically explode as you bring them to the surface...)
/r/MensRights07/10/22 02:58 PM
2

Ah yes, that would make it more difficult. In the meantime, work on some self-improvement stuff. I found doing some type of martial arts (BJJ, Muay Thai, whatever) got me out of my apartment and socializing a bit more and helped my mental health when I was single. Exercise releases endorphins which will make you feel better.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:41 PM
2

So move? Not the easiest thing to do, but if it will improve your mental health, worth it. You are in an apartment, so moving is much easier than if you owned a house (though you could have a pet if you owned a house).
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:25 PM
3

The question shouldn't be: "Did this solve problem X", it should be "Did it reduce problem X enough to be worth the downsides?" Very true. But the women that wanted to trap a man as a father to their baby, wouldn't have used abortion. It would only help in the case where neither wants to be a parent.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:22 PM
14

The only way to win is to not play.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 12:45 PM
15

en mass creation of unwanting fathers Abortion being legal didn't stop this. And abortion being legal also took away fatherhood from men that wanted it. So it's a mixed bag.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 12:10 PM
1

Ah yes, then I did interpret it incorrectly.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 06:06 PM
1

If they would shave their legs / feet, get pedicures, and pass themselves off as tall women, I'm sure they could make good money with foot fetish stuff, never showing anything above the calves. How would you know any different?
/r/MensRights04/10/22 05:57 PM
4

Over 70% of the homeless population is MALE, let’s help our brothers out more. This has more to do with there being more support services for women and children than because of OnlyFans.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 05:43 PM
5

Another case of infantilizing women. They obviously can't be truly responsible for their actions, so we put the burden of everything on men.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 04:11 PM
24

preserving "the peace of families." How is stepping out on your husband not punishable then? That's way worse at preserving the peace of families.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 12:04 PM
3

Yet i have never seen the reverse. Archer addressed breast cancer in men!
/r/MensRights03/10/22 08:09 PM
1

Yeah it's one thing if you don't have a face to face meeting. I think I met face to face with my divorce lawyer a total of twice, once to meet and see if I wanted to hire him, and once in court (luckily it was amicable divorce and no kids involved). But I talked to him on the phone a bunch of times.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 06:14 PM
5

My wedding ring is a tungsten ring that cost like $35 on Amazon. Looks great.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 04:27 PM
4

It's because people look at what you have right now, and what you do right now, type of deal, not seeing all the work you did to build a foundation. It gets very tiresome to deal with that.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 04:07 PM
2

Like it'd only take 24 hours longer to get a female plumber.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 03:50 PM
3

I would caveat that, commercial airlines are safer. Those 1 props that amateurs fly, I do not think are as safe as cars.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 03:50 PM
3

Every single business owner I've known has worked crazy hours. And in the beginning, was one contract away from losing their house (one of my friend's did lose his house).
/r/MensRights03/10/22 12:12 PM
2

men they would rather pay than deal with the emotional consequences. Isn't this the basis of prostitution? That's been wildly successful.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 12:07 PM
2

But how is it intimidating? A victim cannot pursue the case legally, the DA must do it. What DA would not pursue a rape case if the perp gets an abortion? Wouldn't the threat of pressing rape charges unless an abortion happen be considered extortion?
/r/MensRights29/09/22 04:51 PM
22

Plenty of cases where a man (or even boy) was raped and still has to pay child support. OP should pursue it but shouldn't expect to get out of child support here. Only thing I think it'd really help with (besides getting some type of justice) is it'd make it easier for OP to get some form of custody (I would hope).
/r/MensRights29/09/22 01:52 PM
2

Must be no good excuse for not having more women in construction, septic servicing (or plumbing in general), or welding, or...
/r/MensRights28/09/22 12:17 PM
1

There is nothing wrong with wanting a certain type of partner. This cuts both ways however. If the type of partner you want isn't who your current partner is, it's wrong to expect them to change or conform to your standard. My wife and I had pretty frank discussions about how we both felt about a family, our roles in that family, etc. before we got married (some of it even before we got engaged). There are 4 things that, if you are on the same page with your partner, will generally lead to a suc…
/r/MensRights28/09/22 12:14 PM
8

Don't forget the fluffers.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 11:00 AM
8

perform like a porn performer If she wants to have a bunch of fluffers on stand-by to keep blowing me in between scenes, then I'm probably down.... /s
/r/MensRights28/09/22 10:59 AM
1

I'm counting access to guns as ability to buy a gun. I don't see that as equivalent to just owning a gun. And regarding the 16yos, they can legally own long guns just not handguns.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 10:53 AM
2

Same number as men? At least in the USA. Probably more women since a lot of men don't have access to one because of being convicted felons or having DV claims / restraining orders against them (all of which makes you ineligible to own a firearm).
/r/MensRights27/09/22 09:30 PM
6

I think the comment is, living at home. Where would you live other than at home? Who doesn't live at their home?
/r/MensRights26/09/22 02:41 PM
74

The more things change, the more they stay the same.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 02:43 PM
2

Most places where AOC is under the age of 18, there's an exception that if the person is in a position of power over the minor, that AOC doesn't apply and it's instead 18. This usually applies to police, teachers, bosses, etc. So standard AOC doesn't often apply in this scenario. Also, there's usually an age gap requirement too. As in, AOC is 16, but if they're a minor, the other party cannot be more than 5 years older (so 21 is oldest for 16yo, 22 is oldest for 17yo). This isn't true in all cas…
/r/MensRights23/09/22 02:30 PM
1

There's like 9 countries where the murder rate of women is higher than men. I don't know why anyone would make the argument that men are better at defending themselves.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 08:37 PM
1

Do you like fish sticks?
/r/MensRights22/09/22 05:12 PM
28

Considering that men are, on average, more likely to be a victim of a violent crime (it does vary per year and by locale, but I'm talking averages), if anything we're less safe.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 04:59 PM
1

Except it's also illegal to discriminate against someone for gender. So why is it OK to break that part of the law but not another?
/r/MensRights14/09/22 03:11 PM
9

Yes, that was the stupidest sentence I've read in a while.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:53 PM
3

Eh, I knew a guy that handed out business cards to women for the same purpose. They weren't his real job business cards, but literally cards about wanting to hook up. He never got arrested or charged for harassment.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 03:59 PM
6

Giving your wife a "sign this or no kids" ultimatum is not what solid marriages are built on. If this really is a show stopper for you, then you need to just get divorced. Because if you don't trust her already, then why would you trust her to stay on birth control to not have kids? Or not sabotage condoms? Seriously, don't do that type of ultimatum. If she won't sign, end the marriage.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 12:00 PM
18

It's called a postnup. But it's purely up to your wife at this point to sign it. What will you do if she refuses? She doesn't have to sign anything. If you don't trust her, you probably shouldn't have kids with her and just get divorced at this point.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 08:00 PM
2

One-upmanship goes across all genders. It's unfortunate that so many people do it.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 04:07 PM
1

I don't actually know if lactose intolerance is the issue, there's more than one type of sensitivity with milk.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 03:51 PM
4

Not for me, it'd clear the room.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 01:28 PM
1

It's called what-about-ism. Lots of men are falsely accused! What about all the men that are raped?! It's just a tactic to change the subject because they don't want to talk about the original topic.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 10:57 AM
13

And of course, there are more registered male voters than women... right?
/r/MensRights08/09/22 10:51 AM
1

I would add that technically, the phase is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 12:46 PM
1

You may want to rethink Malta: https://lovinmalta.com/news/election-2022/these-women-could-get-elected-under-maltas-gender-quota/
/r/MensRights31/08/22 12:05 PM
1

Malta good? https://lovinmalta.com/news/election-2022/these-women-could-get-elected-under-maltas-gender-quota/ they're forcing women in that weren't elected, which is not democracy.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 12:05 PM
30

Funnily enough, lesbian relationships have higher rates of abuse than other types, so this will make abuse increase too. But of course it's men's fault for not wanting to be with these women.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 04:55 PM
2

+1 on the reference. As I listen to it, this seems more and more like speech software reading text, not an actual person, which would explain a bunch of the quirks in pronunciation.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 12:53 PM
2

Am I the only one bothered by the voice saying 19 hundred and 50? Just say 1950s?
/r/MensRights26/08/22 12:25 PM
1

I don’t think it’s healthy for you to look up a cry for help. In other words, don't use real definitions to talk about stuff, and instead let you define things however you want.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 02:54 PM
2

Don't move the goal posts. Cry for help: https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/Cry+for+Help A suicide attempt can absolutely be just a cry for help and not a "I really want to kill myself" situation.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 02:44 PM
3

Always good to see a proper Tolkien fan.
/r/AntiFeminists25/08/22 12:46 PM
4

Don't feed the troll. Just downvote and move on.
/r/AntiFeminists25/08/22 12:01 PM
4

Don't feed the trolls. Just downvote and move on.
/r/AntiFeminists25/08/22 12:00 PM
2

I wonder if this comes down to more men work during college than women. Just saying that women have more debt because of sexist or racist policies is jumping to conclusions. Did they look at employment records? Did they look at whether more men were going part time and more women going full time? Also, did they look at how many women vs men applied for scholarships and grants? Etc.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:51 AM
6

Look at it as an easy filtering mechanism. You wouldn't want to be in any type of relationship with a woman that shallow, so they are filtering themselves out for you. If you want to be in a relationship with a woman, you want someone who cares about you as a person.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:09 AM
4

Because just crying isn't getting them what they want so they take it a step further.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 10:49 AM
18

Sounds like it's more that women are making more cries for help and men are committing suicide more then.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 08:05 PM
3

Yes, very true. My wife at least knows how to mow a lawn and do all the yard work needed (though she's only used a push mower, not a zero-turn that we have now). And I always have tried to show all girls I've dated how to change a tire if they didn't know how. I'm not always with them and they should just know it.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 03:57 PM
8

I never understood that attitude from men that didn't know how to cook or sew or clean. Why are you proud that you are an inept adult? I enjoy cooking, and would often sew clothes to avoid having to buy new (I'm definitely cheap), and never wanted to live in filth. There's nothing unmanly about that stuff.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 11:11 AM
4

All I can say is my friend spent over 100k to get custody of his kids (from the grandparents), and failed. Another friend got divorced and he never got custody of his kids either, but he went broke pretty quickly. I do not know a any divorced guy that has custody of their kids. However, this is not real data, just anecdotes.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 10:56 AM
1

More making a point that people can easily be framed in this digital world. And it'll ruin a man's life even if there's no proof at all the man did it, just the accusation.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 10:54 AM
1

https://www.grunge.com/101438/weirdest-things-ever-found-chernobyl/ I'll just leave this here.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 07:04 PM
2

There's life inside of Chernobyl, on the elephant's foot. We humans cannot destroy all life. We can destroy life as we know it, but life will figure things out without our help.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 07:03 PM
0

Plot twist, someone used this guy's info to create a Telegram account to do this and ruin his life.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 06:31 PM
3

That 80/20 rule applies to many things, and it is true inside of itself usually. 20% of people receive 80% of the attention, and if you looked further in, you'd probably find that 20% of that original 20% receives 80% of the attention of those, etc. So 4% received 64% of all the attention, which would in theory mean 0.8% received 51.2% of the attention. Not sure how well the data holds against this set as I haven't looked at it, but there's many data sets that show this 80/20 rule, and it usuall…
/r/MensRights11/08/22 07:20 PM
1

Even in two party consent states, they don't always have the ability to stop you recording. If you are not in a location with a reasonable expectation of privacy, you can record regardless. Like if you are on a public street, or any area that the public would generally be. If you are in a private residence, then yes probably illegal to record if they don't give consent. IANAL.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 08:43 PM
26

Also, not sure what the right is exactly, but men can be forced to pay child support to their rapists and share custody with them. Women have abortion they can use.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 05:42 PM
9

Not sure why you got the up-vote. Apparently you aren't into batman much, or you'd know about Halle Berry being cat woman. Or Eartha Kitt. Or Zoe Kravitz (did the voice in Lego Batman movie). Of all the things to criticize about this movie, having a black Catwoman is not one of them.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 11:20 AM
2

The only way to really enforce that is to have some type of child support trust setup, and have a trustee appointed. You could do a set percentage of food, housing, utilities that child support would go towards, as well as half of the costs of all child-only charges (like clothing, school supplies, etc). But there should still be some, for lack of a better term, petty cash that is at the primary custody holders discretion I think. This is still better than say, 100% of the money being at their d…
/r/MensRights04/08/22 10:42 AM
129

I think it should require paternity testing. And, if found that the person being sued for child support is not the biological father, then no child support awarded. That would be a huge leap forward in progress.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 04:36 PM
6

It sure sounds like it's against her will. And it sounds like it was forced after the first touch (because it was obviously unwelcome at that point). At the bare minimum, it would be assault, if not sexual harassment. Either way, this is a bad situation.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 08:15 PM
6

How about you enlighten them with real, legal definitions.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 07:08 PM
17

Total garbage. I'm actually at a loss for words with how much I hate this bill.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 10:53 AM
3

Missing citations I think for these claims. This whole thing just sounds gross.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 08:11 PM
11

So right wing that unless your white, count yourself into being considered a minority. Isn't this true in all states but CA right now? Whites make up 60% of the country. Kentucky isn't even the whitest state, Maine is. Though I think Vermont and Maine keep going back and forth.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 02:32 PM
3

It doesn't stop misuse of child support really. You would use child support as a percentage of groceries, utility bills, housing costs, and 100% of all child activities. However, the receiving party of it would just use none of their funds if at all possible and now use the extra money they have for not spending it on those things to instead use it for whatever they want not child related. Maybe make it like taxes, if you want a tax deduction, show receipts and such. Same with child support. Thi…
/r/MensRights25/07/22 12:16 PM
1

Except a victim doesn't have to struggle to still be a victim. If someone mugs me, I'm handing over my wallet, no struggle. Because it's not worth dying for the $40 in my wallet. How do you know a woman, after stating no, she does not want sex, decides not to struggle so she doesn't get hurt further, killed, etc? I am not saying that's what happened here, but I am merely stating that fighting back is not a requirement of it being rape. You have no way to prove false accusations in 100% of cases,…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 11:03 AM
1

I didn't say I knew he was shit at his job. But even a therapist having a bad day can make a mistake. That's not shit, everyone makes mistakes once in a while.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 08:20 PM
1

You of course assume that all therapists are perfect at their jobs. Maybe he's just not good at digging deeper like that. Or he was having a bad day so couldn't really get a handle on doing it right that day.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 08:16 PM
0

Often times therapists ask WHY something bothers a patient, because that's what matters more than the thing that happened. Because most of how you react to something has to do with YOU, not with what happened to you. Pretty common technique, though maybe the therapist could've had better delivery.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 08:08 PM
2

The OP might have felt dismissed, but often times therapists don't care about what happened, and care far more about WHY it bothers the patient. The therapist could've been asking why it bothered the OP not because the therapist didn't understand, but instead to make the OP articulate why to dig deeper. That's a common technique used in therapy.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 08:07 PM
8

It can be at least proven the defendant didn't rape her, all you have to do is to ask for credible evidence a rape took place. There's potentially cases where they had sex. The guy admits having sex, but it was consensual. The girl says it was not. There's zero evidence of rape. But it could actually happen that way. Things are not so cut and dry.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 11:34 AM
3

That's not an accident though. She knows it may not be her husbands, and so does her husband.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 01:32 AM
14

How do you commit paternity fraud accidentally? It's a conscious choice to lie to your husband about having sex with other men, a prerequisite to paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 06:31 PM
1

I don't think this would qualify as "Child Support" unless the couple is separated. Again, this is more of a divorce law issue than an abortion issue and my point is that changing an abortion law, or recognizing fetus as a human life, shouldn't impact this. Yes, I meant it as, this would be grounds for child support in the case of couple is separated. Sorry if I was not clear.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 12:49 PM
1

Child support pertains to a child's expenses like clothing, school fees etc; a baby in the womb doesn't have expenses. Medical expenses specific to pregnancy, food costs, prenatal vitamins, etc. are costs that go up in pregnancy because she is pregnant. ​ Once again, the baby in the womb doesn't consume anything outside of the womb. Though if there is a welfare element for pregnant women to ensure adequate nutrition etc then that would be logical. WIC can be used by pregnant women, so this is al…
/r/MensRights20/07/22 11:02 AM
2

That is seriously fucked up. She should be in prison for attempted murder.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 08:44 PM
5

Good for this Judge! She is just not taking shit from this woman. And she's trying to help this man realize what he's going through should not be tolerated in any way.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:24 PM
19

Also this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer
/r/MensRights15/07/22 11:15 AM
6

He was a great manager. Everyone above him was terrible, and he didn't have the power to do much unfortunately, which is why I left. But I made it clear to him that me leaving had nothing to do with him, and he seemed to fully understand.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 10:52 AM
1

Unfortunately she is abusing his mental issues hardcore.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 07:15 PM
-1

Just use a disposable phone then and don't tell them where you live. But if you are contemplating killing yourself, then why would you care if that happens? If you do care, then are you really suicidal?
/r/MensRights14/07/22 03:15 PM
-1

1-800-273-8255 national suicide prevention hotline. Please call.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 12:36 PM
80

You know it's funny how when you change the type of thing you are comparing, suddenly the problems with something are glaring. I had a previous employer that added to their HR diversity training, a course that would educate you on the differences of the generations (Boomer, gen X, millenial, etc). I was in one of the test groups that got the training first and was supposed to provide feedback for them to make updates. We did the training, I just sat quietly the whole time. My manager (who was Af…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 12:01 PM
2

Another friend of mine spent well over 100k to try and get custody of his girls (anything beyond every other weekend visitation only at the grandparents house), and never succeeded. He gave up fighting once the oldest turned 18. There was no abuse, he's a stand-up guy, and the mother didn't even have custody, the grandparents did. Dude is an amazing father too. The courts really really suck for this.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 11:03 AM
1

There are some things that are worse than death.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 11:00 AM
2

I hope he does find the courage to leave her.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 10:59 AM
1

Unfortunately, I have some experience in this too.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 10:58 AM
5

One of my workout partners is going through something similar. Crazy ex wife that was lying to try and keep his kid from him. He's been fighting the good fight for years, and is finally seeing his kid. He even brought him to a workout recently, good father / son bonding time.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 09:15 PM
4

I am glad you were able to get away. I think many men have been there at some point in their lives, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 09:06 PM
25

Good. You must maintain control of your weapon at all times. Always assume anyone trying to take it is going to kill you with it. Someone who wasn't trying to do that would first ask you about it.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 09:05 PM
8

I see a lot of calls for solidarity on this sub, and saying that bashing men for being a virgin or small penis whatever is bad, yet here people are bashing men again. It is most likely as simple as victims of abuse tend to have been screwed by their abusers so much they think they deserve it and think they can't get anyone else. To just blatantly say he can't get any other girls is just tearing him down more, which he doesn't need.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 08:21 PM
5

Just because a case can be overturned doesn't mean it's not law until it is overturned. Do you hear the words you say? And I gave another example, married men are forced to pay child support for children that are not theirs, as long as the child is born while they're married. Also, once a woman is pregnant (even by rape as I've explained) he has zero choice at all. You keep saying it's only weaponized against women but none of your arguments hold up. You keep living your bubble. But there are th…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 07:25 PM
12

So there's case precedent that men who are raped still have to pay child support to their rapists and you say it's not societal weaponized? We live in a common law society which means case precedence is equivalent to law. I like that logic you have.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 07:07 PM
4

I am not talking about women not wanting to have sex is weaponizing it at all. Apparently you are not a good mind reader (but nice attempt though). See my other comment I responded with about examples of how it can be weaponized.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 07:01 PM
6

Not joking at all, she definitely doesn't feel that way. If you are talking about sex being weaponized against men, first thing that comes to mind is this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer a guy can literally be raped, and then forced to pay child support to his rapist. In this case, an underage boy being raped. How is that not weaponized? Then there's paternity fraud and related too (since we're talking about marriage as well) such that a man can be forced to be financially res…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 06:59 PM
9

You want to talk about weaponizing sex, look at all the ways it's weaponized against men. And I can tell you that my wife in no way feels sex is weaponized against her right now.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 06:54 PM
115

Well it's not uncommon for someone who is abused (exactly what this is) to side with their abuser. We see this with women and men. But just wow, threatened to kill him. He needs out asap.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 06:17 PM
339

Why the hell does he still want to be with her? She literally threatened to kill you. First rule of firearms, only point them at something you want to destroy.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 05:02 PM
10

The issue is they are specifically manipulating their husbands and being toxic over something their husbands have absolutely no power over. Sex in a marriage should be (at least partly) about the physical expression of love and affection between you and your partner. It's not a commodity used to trade for things. There are more women voters than men, a woman on the supreme court was one of the judges that voted to overturn it, the speaker of the house Pelosi (a woman) and the Vice President (a w…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 04:40 PM
19

If I'm not having sex with my wife because she is ill or some other reason outside of her control, that's one thing. If she is weaponizing sex against me, that is an entirely different matter.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 04:30 PM
25

You punish those who are not at fault? That seems extremely toxic. Birth rates are already on the decline, and if you are a conspiracy theorist, it does have the government's attention and this is their answer. Care to provide proof that MANY husbands had a part to play? Women make up like 53% of the voting population, so why haven't women made sure to vote in people to secure these laws in place? They have the majority voting power.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:21 PM
38

Because these husbands took the rights away so are rightfully punished? That makes no sense. What these women are admitting to is that sex with them is a reward for good behavior, which is not how a marriage should be. There was even one woman on the Supreme Court that voted to overturn it, so it's not just all men doing it. How about get upset at Congress (like Pelosi) for knowing that this is legislating from the bench and not appropriate (even Ruth Bader Ginsburg said about as much), and not …
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:00 PM
1

At least someone has the ability to change their body in that sense. Can't do anything about size of your genitalia.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 12:30 PM
45

Actually they would be doing the world a favor. Men and women are equal. So commenter is doing this for equality.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 12:22 PM
14

You didn't answer my question.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 02:34 PM
18

So we should just sit in silence while misinformation is spread?
/r/MensRights08/07/22 02:23 PM
10

To add on this, men can be forced to pay child support even in cases of rape. Even in cases of underage rape where a woman rapes a minor male child. Sure sounds like there are zero rights to me.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 02:12 PM
9

I don't think it's law either that a woman needs her husband's permission to get tubes tied. I haven't really looked but never heard of such a law.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 07:55 PM
1

Commenter didn't say women started it, specifically feminism started it. This has nothing to do with genders specifically, and commenter did not say all women were this way, so not sure why you are trying to make it seem like the commenter said women or made it a gender thing.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 05:35 PM
3

No, you are inferring it. The OP is asking why he's experienced things the way he has.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 05:31 PM
3

OP didn't say indigenous people are violent. He said 9 out of 10 times he's been attacked, it's been indigenous women and wants to know why there's such a heavy lean towards indigenous women attacking him. How is that racist?
/r/MensRights30/06/22 01:41 PM
1

Does reddit ignore reports of these comments / posts for hate / harassment / threatening violence? I would go through and report every single comment / post I come across that has this. I don't frequent these subreddits that usually do this though.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 01:27 PM
8

The only issue was that he let the kids live there while the mom was in rehab, as she was in rehab near her parents. He had custody prior, but let his kids go to school down there and establish after-school activities. Once that happened, the courts didn't want to upset their life, and the Grandparents were friends with the judge. There was zero abuse or any of that, he is an amazing father. The mom was abusing drugs, not him, there was zero evidence. He is an upstanding citizen, even has govern…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 12:50 PM
10

Generally 50/50 is best case scenario. My friend could *barely* get visitation after spending 100k on trying to get custody. And this was with the Grandparents having primary custody, not even the other (they were maternal grandparents). The courts do not like men.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 12:33 PM
22

Add to that that women outnumber men in college, I believe the ratio is now 60/40 in favor of women. If we want equality, and it's acceptable to give gender-specific scholarships, we need male-only scholarships to try and increase male college attendance.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 11:17 AM
5

This study cites the gender pay gap which this sub has shown is debunked many times, so already seems suspect.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 11:10 AM
1

Keep in mind however, that we live in a common law society. Beyond just innocent until proven guilty, this also means that case precedent is exactly supposed to be considered law. So yes, actually court rulings are law and that's the way common law is designed. Of course, those rulings can be reversed, which is also part of the law.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 10:54 AM
6

Care to cite said studies? Men work plenty of unpaid hours too, both on the job and at home. I sure don't get paid for all the manual labor of doing yard work on my property (not that I expect to, it's part of my responsibilities).
/r/MensRights30/06/22 10:52 AM
3

Commenter asked for an example of feminism helping men tho, still waiting.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 10:51 AM
1

I never said they alone can amend it. But there's two ways to do an amendment. Congress puts it forward and the states ratify it, or there's a constitutional convention directly by the states (bypassing Congress).
/r/MensRights29/06/22 01:31 AM
1

I am basing on the fact that they already have laws on the books around healthcare and medical procedures, so this would just be working on existing powers, not granting them additional powers. But even then, a constitutional amendment would be able to take care of it. Of course a constitutional amendment has (as it should) a much higher bar to pass, it's still something Congress can put forward.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 04:17 PM
1

I'm not sure what grounds you use to say this (they already rule on healthcare, like the ACA, and have some control over medical procedures (FDA-related congressional committees, budgets, etc), so why is abortion different?), but they could've put forward a constitutional amendment worst case scenario. Congress can do things here, not sure why you say they can't.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 11:55 AM
1

You're the one that mentioned it as what seemed like an alternative to them having the baby, when in fact they still must have the baby.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 02:11 PM
3

You seem confused. Try reading again.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 02:11 PM
1

Or they could put the baby up for adoption TBF, they still have to have the baby to put it up for adoption.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:33 AM
3

No, but R v W was legislating from the bench, and the supreme court is well within their rights to reverse previous rulings. Congress had 50 years to pass actual laws on abortion but did not.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:30 AM
4

Roe v Wade just said that the right to an abortion was tied to the 14th amendment, and then the judges laid out the rules of when an abortion is legal and when it's not. This is purely legislating from the bench. Congress had 50 years to pass actual laws to lay out the real rules for abortion, but decided not to. Rulings in the supreme court get reversed, it happens, and every law maker knows this. The decision by Congress to do nothing for 50 years should be the outrage here, not the supreme co…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:06 AM
1

They still fall under all federal laws AFAIK, just not all state laws.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:21 AM
1

Because there are only 51 sovereign bodies in the United States. The federal government and the state governments.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:40 PM
12

There's also non-hormonal female birth control. For men, it's basically condoms or reducing testosterone.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 11:41 AM
3

Except that feminists and menslib use it, so above comment is pointing out how they are using it incorrectly, not just you.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 10:57 AM
2

Not everyone may remember, there was a period where the police and DAs in various states kept trying to charge and convict people of violating wire tapping laws and such when trying to record police. Governments are so hostile towards this I feel like it would get you in bigger trouble, not save you from trouble.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 07:46 PM
2

Another thing is there's a lot of states that require 2 party consent for recording (I live in one such state). Recording all the time would be impossible at this point.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 04:17 PM
5

It's like in War Games, the only way to win is not to play.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 10:21 AM
14

Yeah... had the same thought... unfortunately I get the 'too much internet for today' thought too many times on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 12:48 PM
-1

I probably would've had the same reaction had it been a girl leaving because a boyfriend said stuff. I read the post and it seems like the OP was reading into things a lot instead of letting her explain herself. I say this as someone who often will say the result of many thoughts and that result gets completely misinterpreted all the time. I think OP should've talked with her about it that night or the next day before leaving. If he didn't like her answers, then leave. Edit: a big thing that mak…
/r/MensRights10/06/22 08:35 PM
2

But does not eliminate I believe was the concern I had. Still growing shit in petri dishes from the toothbrush.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 10:48 AM
3

I believe their test was taking objects in bathrooms with lids up and lids down, and growing from them in petri dishes. They all had bacterial growth found in fecal matter. I don't remember all the specifics, this was years ago.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 08:06 PM
38

Refuse to talk to anyone without a lawyer. She wants to accuse you of a series crime, ANYTHING you say can and will be used against you. So you gotta have your parents get you an attorney and get advice from them. Do not say anything to anyone except the attorney.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 07:25 PM
2

Or she could use her foot (unless she has a physical disability) like so many guys do.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 07:22 PM
6

Or you could install a little night light (using the red wave length is even better) that illuminates just enough so you can see the seat. Because if you're too tired to bother checking first, I'm guessing you're too tired to wash your hands properly, which after fondling a toilet set in the dark, ew. Washing your hands would wake you up more than a little red night light (which if it is red, won't even affect your vision in the dark).
/r/MensRights09/06/22 07:20 PM
5

Stop moving the goal posts. The paper says seat, not lid.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 07:19 PM
7

Stop changing the goal posts. The paper said seat, not lid.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 07:18 PM
24

If the paper said lid, I'd agree. But all it states is seat. Not to mention that most toilets I've seen in commercial places don't even have lids so it's moot.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 07:17 PM
11

Don't move the goal posts. Paper said seat, not lid.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 07:16 PM
9

Don't move the goal posts. The paper says seat, not lid. AND most industrial toilets don't have lids anyway (I've seen very few toilets in businesses that have lids).
/r/MensRights09/06/22 07:16 PM
13

I think people are getting the seat vs lid confused. The seat being down, there's still plenty of shit that can come flying out. The lid down, not so much. But didn't Myth Busters also do tests to show that fecal matter was basically on everything in a bathroom even with the lid down?
/r/MensRights09/06/22 07:15 PM
7

What is it that women say when a man responds to her venting? Stop trying to fix my problems and just listen? Maybe men need to say the same answer then.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 11:02 AM
2

White men under 40 are the only group that you can discriminate against without any possible repercussions as they are not in any federally protected groups.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 03:29 PM
1

Text and email are not ghosting man. I didn't say you couldn't avoid phone calls. Just you couldn't ghost your ex.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 02:19 PM
1

Yup, as said, it's impossible to ghost them. Email is fine, but you are still communicating. Also, if your child has activities like sports games or school plays, you'll end up seeing the ex if she is also at those things (even if you don't talk to each other).
/r/MensRights01/06/22 02:17 PM
5

Yes, that will go over well. Daughter is in the ER and you ignore your ex's calls and never see her in the hospital or anything because you refuse to take her calls and refuse to call her. A friend of mine was going through some very contested custody issues, and there's just no way he could've ignored the grandparents (who had custody, not the dad, and paying over 100k in legal fees to get custody ended in folly).
/r/MensRights01/06/22 01:34 PM
32

You can't ghost the person who you have to share your daughter with.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 12:07 PM
7

And don't call me Shirley.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 02:03 PM
2

You are coming off extremely entitled. When I first read that she was stand-off ish, I was expecting something more more than just "oh ok." Depending on my situation, that's exactly how I might respond.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 12:09 PM
3

But overall, don't let these assholes make shit up about pregnancy death rates, which randomly became an issue recently. It's absolutely not random, it's because of the potential Roe v Wade reversal.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 09:44 PM
1

IIRC, the bill went to Congress only 400 pages, and left Congress 1200 pages. The Republicans made a lot of changes to the ACA before they passed it. I've no idea what Obama had in the bill about men and women before it went in, but both houses agreed to this as well as Obama. So blaming either only Congress or only Obama is wrong, they all did this.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 12:01 PM
16

I've said time and again, I am glad I am not dating in these times (happily married). I feel for men dating now, it's weird out there.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 12:19 PM
80

Men are expected to make the first move, but if a women doesn’t appreciate it, he’s a creep or sexual harasser. Dammed if you do, dammed if you don’t thing. Often times the only difference between being a creep / harasser, and being a normal guy just talking to a girl, is the guy's attractiveness to the woman. It's sad.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 11:05 AM
5

Can we require alternate articles when they are paywalled?
/r/MensRights11/05/22 03:21 PM
5

In the case 3 of, it says *may* terminate, not *will*. So no, there's no guarantee. And for number 7, you're saying that all a man has to do is not sign a birth certificate, and even if the mother sues for a paternity test, and it comes back that the guy is the biological father, there's no way to force him to pay child support at all? Based on the way number 7 reads, no one would be able to get child support, so that seems like it's not laid out well. Besides, in order to confirm it, you must a…
/r/MensRights10/05/22 03:14 PM
6

Uh this link does not support your case. This link you provided has this exact quote: Conversely, a court will not allow a parent to relinquish his or her parental rights simply because they wish to stop paying child support. So now, if a male can in fact still be forced to be a parent and be potentially jailed for being too poor to pay child support.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 02:33 PM
2

I wonder if BrokeAssStuart is broke because of forced fatherhood which existed during Roe v. Wade...
/r/MensRights09/05/22 08:33 PM
28

Yes, and no one should be judged based on their fetishes when done between two consenting adults.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 06:23 PM
44

How is what you're saying any different than discrimination against men for being men? Why does his wealth mean he shouldn't have sympathy for this situation?
/r/MensRights06/05/22 05:29 PM
1

Yes, Roe v Wade just tied the right to get an abortion to the 14th amendment, specifically the right to privacy. One thing that it did that does bother me though, is the judges laid out what trimesters are OK to get what types of abortions (elective vs medically suggested vs mom could die if she doesn't get it). That, to me, is legislating from the bench. Congress should've addressed this issue right after Roe v Wade in the 70s, and the fact that they haven't should be the bigger outrage than th…
/r/MensRights06/05/22 12:14 PM
5

A friend of mine is going through this exact thing. His ex wife (married at the time) had a drug problem, so he sent her to rehab. In order to help her, he sent their kids down to stay with her parents (which lived like 30min away from the rehab center) so she could see the kids regularly. He did this despite my warnings that he shouldn't let his kids establish a life down there, as he enrolled them in school and their residence was changed to the grandparents house. After she got out of rehab a…
/r/MensRights05/05/22 01:58 PM
1

The courts will be much more willing to believe you (this goes for anyone in any situation) if you are documenting everything you can in related to this, including dates a times. You must do this regularly, keeping diligent notes. Sure, it's still your word vs the other person's word. But if you are super organized and detail oriented, the other person is not, then the judge will definitely be more inclined to believe you. Please make sure you and your husband are writing down everything you can…
/r/MensRights29/04/22 07:21 PM
2

There is not much you can do to support him other than help him write down every single conversation he has with a female coworker, dates and times, etc. Being there to emotionally support him, and just believe him that he didn't do anything, helps so much more than you realize though. False accusations are stressful enough, but it compounds exponentially when you are basically turned into a pariah. This type if situation is exactly why men are something like 3x more likely to commit suicide tha…
/r/MensRights29/04/22 05:10 PM
3

It is my understanding that lesbian relationships have more DV than any other demographic. Unfortunately I do not have a source handy, so I could just be spouting more nonsense on the internet, but I know I had read that with sources at one point.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 04:08 PM
1

Eyewitness testimony is considered, when you look at the statistics of it, the most unreliable form of evidence. Yet it's the form of evidence given the most weight by juries it seems. I forget where I saw the statistic, but I believe around 74% of wrongly convicted people who were proven to be innocent later had eye witness testimony stating emphatically that the now-proven-innocent person did the crime.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 04:06 PM
3

A grey area as in... if teacher (a women let's say) was accused of harassing kids. They should be suspended from their role while they're under investigation. That is a slightly different situation than court of public opinion. And I would say, suspended with pay, and the reason for the suspension must not be made public (unless the accused decides to make it public). If there's a potential safety issue, yes steps need to be taken to separate accused from potential victims, but done in a way tha…
/r/MensRights28/04/22 02:19 PM
3

But the point is that until he's proven guilty, he's innocent. People need to stop convicting someone in the court of public opinion. It screws up the lives of many men. Why you think this is a grey area is beyond me.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 01:42 PM
2

Wow, 3 months? That's pretty crazy. My wife and I had a hard time finding our oldest a therapist but it wasn't 3 months luckily. I do not know how severe your depression is, but if you are able to, please find a physical activity you can do, something that makes you break out in a sweat. Weight lifting, kick boxing (or some other type of martial art), an adult league sport, or something solo. When you sweat, your body produces endorphins which will help (I know from experience). It's not the sam…
/r/MensRights27/04/22 10:36 PM
6

I hope you are getting help in dealing with your suicidal urges. Despite what the loudest voices in society tell you, you do actually matter. And there are people in your life where you do make a difference (even if you don't see it). Having had family members commit suicide, know that you do really matter. Please seek help.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 09:58 PM
1

Alcohol is only one method of intoxication. There's marijuana, oxycodone, and many other prescription medications. If you are not OK to drive, you should not be getting behind the wheel, regardless of the substance. They can't make car starters linked to all of them. Regarding safety net, they have one. It's called social security. Kids get money from social security until they turn 18. But no social safety net will replace 100% of the income from the parent that was killed. So again, the kids s…
/r/MensRights22/04/22 05:01 PM
5

So a parent that cannot get life insurance because of some health issue should be punished? If they had cancer, but are in full recovery, they're unable to get life insurance for a while (used to be not at all). So screw their kids right? Or what if they have type 1 diabetes, like my Aunt had. She couldn't get life insurance. But it's no fault of her own, so screw her kids right? This law only punishes someone who is driving while intoxicated. That is *stupid* no matter what.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 03:52 PM
5

It seems odd that legislation moves in the direction of punishing people instead of helping people. Does it not help the kids to continue to get financially supported when their original financial support was taken away by the driver because of a stupid decision to drive while intoxicated? As long as this law is applied equally to all genders, I see no issue. You don't want to be responsible for this, do not drive intoxicated. It's similar to the argument I have about use of deadly force in your…
/r/MensRights22/04/22 03:49 PM
11

Not to mention that a person can revoke consent at any time, regardless of what is signed. That's why porn studios have safe words for all the actors. Doesn't matter that you signed that you consent to sex, you can say stop (or whatever safe word is chosen) at any time and if anything continues, it's rape. Porn studios will interview the actors before and after as well as the contracts, and that's about as good as you can get. If the interview after the sex has the actor laughing and smiling and…
/r/MensRights21/04/22 12:26 PM
14

This TikTok trend is actively not moving or allowing the man to move so he can pull out. That's not lying, that's physically doing something the other person does not want in sex. Revoking consent means further unwanted actions are rape, according to women. Why is it different for men?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 02:01 PM
11

So, if men cannot revoke consent, neither can women? Which means once we start, all bets are off?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 01:47 PM
1

So many of the Disney movies, the mother / step mother was the antagonist. So seems to be just a Disney thing.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 05:16 PM
-9

That or say, women and children are at their highest risk maybe. I agree that it's subtle and probably left to interpretation. That's just how I read it at first. Either way, definitely can be worded better. Only reason I don't really think much of it is that it's for international women's day, when the focus is (even more so) on women. This whole war in Ukraine is just awful all around, for everyone.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 06:58 PM
-22

It says that their safety is placed at the highest risk, not that women are the highest risk. There's a difference. The way it reads to me, it's saying their safety is highest risk that their safety has ever been, not that women are less safe than men.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 06:46 PM
-25

I don't see anywhere in the tweet that they say "highest risk." I don't see any mention of women being affected more. Just some statistics on the fact that majority that have fled are women. Not surprising since men are not allowed to flee.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 06:35 PM
4

Wonder how well it'd go over if I were to respond to being accused of mansplaining by saying "maybe I wouldn't have to mansplain if you'd womanlisten." Oh the fun times.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 01:56 PM
2

I'm not sure I follow. Is sexual assault considered an appropriate response to sexual assault? What rules of engagement have been set?
/r/MensRights07/03/22 05:00 PM
4

So the original offender commits "regular" sexual assault and the comment I replied to would be committing aggravated sexual assault. Seems like a lose / lose situation to me.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 04:59 PM
12

Do we not claim in this very same sub that kicking a man between the legs is sexual assault? Is this a tit-for-tat thing? He sexually assaults your gf, so you sexually assault him? Not saying it's wrong, just wanted clarification. I think getting the law involved (another commenter mentioned this) is an interesting take as well. One thing to keep in mind, is that his assault is less likely to be caught on video as it was the first one, and after that cell phones most likely start coming out in f…
/r/MensRights07/03/22 02:59 PM
2

* still citation needed The majority of millionaires get that way through retirement funds, a lot had debt (including student loans). Not all even made 6 figures. Seems weird for you to make these claims without reading the studies and without providing citations. Otherwise it's just hearsay.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 02:50 PM
2

*citation needed More of the Forbes 400 are first gen than ever: https://www.forbes.com/sites/afontevecchia/2014/10/03/there-are-more-self-made-billionaires-in-the-forbes-400-than-ever-before/?sh=6a81dc0a3369 Every study done on millionaires so far has shown that something like only 10% are millionaires because of inherited wealth (millionaire next door and national study of millionaires are 2 easy to find studies). Edit: Also, according to a study (I forget which one, The Money Guy Show goes ov…
/r/MensRights07/03/22 02:06 PM
20

If they allow reports in women's locker rooms for women's sports, then this isn't a men issue, it's a sports issue. If reports are banned from women's locker rooms then yeah, there's a major issue here. I do not know whether they are or are not.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 09:34 PM
1

The Russians are not going to kill them all. What is the point of taking Ukraine if you're going to kill everyone in it? If that is the case, they may as well have just carpet bombed and spared the lives of their soldiers. What's your alternative? Abandon the country and just hand it over to the Russians? If you reaped the benefits of society, you should defend it.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 08:56 PM
1

I mean, if a man and woman soldier are together, and no Russians to fight right now? Why not work on the second thing you said too? :P
/r/MensRights02/03/22 05:50 PM
70

First, I think all able bodied men should stay and defend their country. Second, I think all able bodied women should stay and defend their country. It should instead read, all able bodied adults must stay, 18 to 60. Exception is if your family has children, one adult may leave with the children (there's really no reason for the children to stay, and children should not be orphaned if possible). There are plenty of women in Ukraine willing to fight. I read about the resistance in France during W…
/r/MensRights02/03/22 04:22 PM
9

Unfortunately you will be ridiculed both by other boys and by girls if you make a stink about this. However, this is textbook sexual harassment if they are unwelcome touches. The ridicule is because of the stereotype that all men want this type of attention from a girl; to not want it means something is wrong with you. This stereotype is also partly why underage boys are not really seen as victims when an adult woman rapes them (of course they don't call it rape either, but that's a separate iss…
/r/MensRights02/03/22 02:51 PM
10

I use my past experiences to make sure that I fight and advocate for my children that they get every single bit of support possible. I will not let them go through that experience, it was very debilitating. The narrative of "suck it up / man up" is used even today, even outside of school, to deny men support to succeed. Thanks for your encouragement!
/r/MensRights02/03/22 02:38 PM
14

This is also general stereotyping that is acting like all gay men are this way, all straight men are that way. I thought stereotyping was bad? If you take gay vs straight in this article and replace it with two races, you'd have *outrage* about this article and I doubt it'd even have been printed.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 02:15 PM
34

I also had heard in school and other places many times that girls were smarter / better than boys at school. I also had (still do) learning disabilities that at the time were undiagnosed. My parents had requested multiple times to have me tested, but the school refused (which I found out later is illegal where I grew up, if a parent submitted a written request, the school is required by law to test). So of course I believed it and stopped trying so hard because why bother? In the end it didn't r…
/r/MensRights02/03/22 02:13 PM
6

You completely missed the point. Whether they are real feminists or not does not matter. They are in and run most feminist groups (at least on reddit). Doesn't matter if they are real or fake if they ban men from the groups, thus depriving men of a platform in which we can make sure we have equal rights. And who are you to judge when men need and don't need? The very fact that men get banned from feminist groups for talking about men's rights ipso facto means we need a forum where we can talk ab…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 06:19 PM
5

First, you don't get to tell other people how to spend their time. Second, feminism has a history of advancing women over men. If if what you say is true, that "100% REAL feminists" believe in the same things we do, that doesn't mean we shouldn't take their history into account. Third, there are still a lot of toxic women attached to feminism, and men get blackballed easily. Look at story after story of men that post in this sub getting outright banned from feminist subs, just for posting in her…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 06:14 PM
4

But right there, you are generalizing and lumping all MRAs into one. This is textbook definition of prejudice. How can you preach for equality when you are practicing prejudice, one of the key things that breaks down equality?
/r/MensRights28/02/22 06:07 PM
3

Back before internet, everything was done through community. You'd join a local church (synagogue, temple, whichever religion you belong to), join the free masons, any other local community organizations. You would meet other men, some with wives, others girlfriends, you'd get to know them, they'd introduce you to women, etc. This day in the internet age, there's less and less local community, which makes meeting people harder. The other thing that used to happen a lot was relationships with cow…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 06:04 PM
3

Sorry it takes credibility away from your article when you say you despise MRAs. Second sentence in your article. If you despise MRAs then why are you even here since you despise us?
/r/MensRights28/02/22 05:51 PM
0

I don't think your statement shows what you think it shows. A stay at home mother can in fact baby a working husband. Cook his food for him, clean for him, handle the money for him, such that all he has to do is go to work, come home and sit in the recliner and drink a beer, then eat dinner. This is the type of relationship where his wife becomes a surrogate mother for him. Unfortunately I've seen this a lot and I think it's bad for both parties. Instead, both should be participating in all pare…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 01:26 PM
2

Sad that she lost the money, but what does this have to do with mens' rights?
/r/MensRights24/02/22 03:28 PM
1

I see no addressing the fact that you were doing exactly what you claimed I did. But I'll leave it at this. You are correct that as a whole, men are stronger than women. However there's plenty of individual women that are stronger than a lot of individual men. Plenty of women that are taller than a lot of men, etc. You keep focusing on drywall, but there's no push for equality in janitorial services, security guard services, septic services, electricians, etc. all trades that do not require sign…
/r/MensRights24/02/22 02:48 PM
1

Now you are literally putting words in my mouth, as my comment did not contain the text "men should be left to hurt themselves." Do not do what you are claiming I did. I also did not say "men should just hurt themselves for the job." So again, you are literally doing what you are claiming I did (but did not do). It should work both ways, if there really are jobs that should be left to men, that should include safer jobs too, or you are really saying it's OK for only men to do dangerous jobs, all…
/r/MensRights24/02/22 02:26 PM
1

You are the one who is using anecdotal evidence as justification for leaving some jobs to men. The dangerous jobs where getting hurt is a real possibility. You literally said that some jobs should be left to men, so not sure how what I said was putting words in your mouth.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 02:12 PM
2

I understand what you're trying to say, but there's plenty of guys that get hurt on the job. *Way* more guys get hurt on the job than women. But it's OK since we are "stronger" yes? Women get to have the less dangerous jobs, men get to have the more dangerous ones.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 11:45 AM
27

"Fathers are not second class citizens." - Best. Quote. Ever.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 04:25 PM
49

I am 100% for improved working conditions. I am against the actual antiwork movement if it's actually not working. I also think that someone does need to do some of these dangerous and hard jobs. I do not think it should be 90+% men doing it, I think we should strive for gender equality in *all* aspects of work, not just cushy high paying jobs that is the system today.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 02:22 PM
3

Or maybe he's scared of being 'canceled' online because of how damn sensitive everyone is. I honestly do not know how I'd handle dating this day and age.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 01:56 PM
1

Whoever files first with police looks to be the victim. Just because you file a police report doesn't mean you have to press charges. But you want the police report in place. Also, TALK TO A LAWYER IMMEDIATELY. It's the only way to really protect yourself, lawyer the police report.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 02:51 PM
3

Unfortunately in some places, paternity doesn't matter, if you are married to her when she has the baby, you are responsible.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 01:28 PM
2

That money doesn't come directly from you, and doesn't reduce your benefit. While I do think the way social security is run is pretty awful, there is something to be said for preventing a lot of elderly from living in abject poverty.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 12:06 PM
1

I know it's not legally a pension, I'm talking about the way it works. And it sounds like this court case was around the governments right to change social security benefit payments. Which of course, a pensions benefit payment can be adjusted too, in order to avoid the pension from becoming insolvent (which is why Congress had to modify social security benefits in the past).
/r/MensRights16/02/22 09:23 PM
1

True, although companies mismanage pensions that many people would be without their pension were it not for federally backed pension insurance. While social security's insolvency is the cause of the federal government and their borrowing against the trust, company pension insolvency is due to company mismanagement and related. Both are backed by the word of the federal government in the end.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 05:11 PM
2

My bad, I left out a single word. I will be more clear with my metaphors in the future.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 05:04 PM
0

Would not a mismanaged pension behave the same way? They've had to change how pensions pay out, or the government come in and bail out pensions in the past. They're still pensions. I never said SS was like a well maintained pension.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 05:02 PM
-1

You can opt of out SS in certain circumstances for certain incomes. And I believe there are definitely situations where a pension is not optional (I believe this is common with unions, and military as an example). SS trust absolutely invests the money. It has certain rules for how it must be invested, but so do pensions. SS benefits can be reduced, as the same with pensions. The only thing SS does that a pension never does is pay out people who haven't worked. I am not saying that the SS is *act…
/r/MensRights16/02/22 03:42 PM
-9

So it's a pension with extra benefits effectively. I understand it's a government run program, but other than points 2 and 3, it seems to be handled basically like a pension. Points 2 and 3 are just extra benefits, they aren't something that takes away from it being like a pension.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:55 PM
-1

Men in monasteries are not guaranteed to get the best healthcare specific for men, and are not guaranteed to live the healthiest lifestyles. But regardless, multiple men on my dad's side lived to 90, some beyond. Of course the women live longer (late 90s, one into her 100s) but the men are much longer than average. Regardless, things you do when you are much younger absolutely affect your health. They've found that the biggest health issue with obesity is immobility. This also means that if you …
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:48 PM
2

If your grandpa got a military pension then yes she could live on that. And no, I plan on living on my investments, supplementing with social security to reduce my draw on those investments.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:39 PM
-4

But living longer will get more of the benefit that we put in for. I don't think we've tapped the full potential of health for men, so I'm not going to just give up and say there's no way we could try and match women's life expectancy. You say a man can't just choose to not get stabbed or not get started in a way, but that's not entirely true. Men often get stabbed / shot / whatever because we put ourselves in these types of dangerous situations (or feel we're expected to because of male stereot…
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:36 PM
1

My point is that if you look at how social security is done, it seems to exactly be a pension. It's just not as big of a pension. Your employer contributes 6.2% of your salary into it of their own money. And then you are to contribute 6.2% if your salary into it. You can draw it once you hit a retirement age (admittedly it's older than standard pension, but still has a retirement age). You get paid social security indefinitely as long as you are alive, and your spouse gets a benefit. It seems to…
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:29 PM
-5

They can choose to live longer. Men have lower life expectancy because of things like doing the more dangerous job, overworking, etc. Not everything can be changed, but choosing to boycott more dangerous jobs (after all, women want equality, so they should be working more of those dangerous jobs yes?), it would increase life expectancy. I'm sure there's other things men can do to bump that number as well.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:23 PM
17

She draws the spousal benefit. As far as I know, it does NOT reduce your benefit.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:21 PM
-5

How is social security not a pension? You put in half, your employer puts in half. When you die, the pension goes away, unless you have a death benefit, which is usually around 50% of your pension goes to your spouse. Same with social security, you have a death benefit, and some percentage goes to your spouse. The only main difference is the government mismanages social security (borrowing from the trust was *stupid*), but employers can't borrow against pensions that they hold.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:20 PM
1

You can't use women to suppress wages though, because their wages are equal (again, this has been shown on this subreddit time and again). How do you suppress wages with a gender when that gender is paid the same? Either the wage gap is real and feminists are correct there, or it's not real and it can't be used to suppress wages; you can't have it both ways. Regarding societal collapse, you are treating feminism as the driving force (the virus, if you will). I think feminism is the fever, or con…
/r/MensRights15/02/22 08:47 PM
5

Not sure what the point of this post is. If a person doesn't have balls (a woman), then how could they possibly know how painful it is? if they do have balls, then they know (pretty sure every guy has been kicked in the balls at least once).
/r/MensRights15/02/22 02:40 PM
3

For point #2, the wage gap has been dis-proven, in this very sub, so how exactly are women cheaper? For point #4, machines do not do all those things, otherwise men still wouldn't be the majority of work place deaths. Regarding societal collapse, I don't think it will. Society is a very complex, moving, living, breathing "organism." It's total hubris to think we can predict how a chaotic system like this will behave. Things are swinging in one direction, and they will end up countering and swing…
/r/MensRights15/02/22 01:12 PM
6

It is super situational. If there's more than one attacker, someone has a gun, or knife to her throat, and fighting would obviously lead to death, you have to weigh whether you want to die or be raped. What about if he drugged her? She may not be capable of fighting now. Or if she was drunk and taken advantage of? If she has a legitimate fear for her life, and she'd rather be raped than die, then I guess she's getting raped. I fail to see how this is a men's rights issue though.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 02:48 PM
15

D'oh! Yeah that's pretty terrible. I believe statistics show that Lesbian couples have the most domestic violence, so shouldn't the 'wife yells at me' show as much or more info about domestic violence?
/r/MensRights09/02/22 01:07 PM
16

Where's the image for the search result for wife yells at me?
/r/MensRights09/02/22 12:58 PM
3

Yup. Which is why I think there should be some leeway based on how close you are in age to the other person. A 40 year old with a 15 year old, ew gross. But in the case of the linked article, I think what happened to the boy was very wrong.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 08:24 PM
3

There's children that reach "sexual maturity" at pretty young ages. We should not adjust them lower, ugh. I think the only leeway would be how close someone is to the younger age. An 18 year old being with a 17 year old is not, IMO, a problem, but does violate age of consent laws in some states.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 08:13 PM
1

Based on the he said / she said of rape cases, I'm sure you've provided enough that a conviction would be hard even if you decided to "turn on him." However, most guys I think worry just as much about being convicted in the court of public opinion as they do in a court of law. Even with completely false allegations, the very fact that there are allegations (especially if there's images of you with bruises or tied up or whatever your kink is, after the fact) can cause a man to get fired, never be…
/r/MensRights08/02/22 01:56 PM
3

Unfortunately you can write all the consent stuff you want in preparation, but that doesn't prove you didn't revoke consent during. Consent can be revoked at any time, and no document or declaration ahead of time can prevent that. Even getting a statement after the fact doesn't guarantee, because the argument could be made you were coerced into making that statement. There is no 100% safe guarantee for someone that a sexual act won't be turned into a rape allegation. And convincing a Jury you we…
/r/MensRights08/02/22 12:22 PM
22

Agree 100%! OP needs to leave her, and at this point needs to never have sex with her again the moment she said that, even before the break-up. Record future conversations with her, install security cameras in your place, only meet her either in public or at your place with said security cameras. Break things off as soon as you can (while recording).
/r/MensRights07/02/22 03:47 PM
33

I would be careful about having witnesses. Eye witness testimony is the least reliable form of evidence, yet it's held to be some of the most influential with juries. Absolutely record it (install security cameras in your place too, ahead of time and make sure she's aware you have security cameras ahead of time).
/r/MensRights07/02/22 03:46 PM
17

I 100% support the holiday being all about her as long as our holiday is recognized too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steak\_and\_Blowjob\_Day
/r/MensRights03/02/22 03:39 PM
6

Glad to have someone who recognizes and is actively working to fix the wrongs currently in our society.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 09:15 PM
11

The gender of a doctor doesn't really change how good they are at what they do. Should OBGYNs only be female? My wife's OB is male and she plans on staying with him until he retires (he is an amazing doctor). Requesting a specialist for the area that is having issues is absolutely fine. I would've just pressed getting a urologist, and use the argument that a general practitioner may not know all the intimate details about what could be wrong. But a female urologist is just as qualified as a male…
/r/MensRights26/01/22 07:58 PM
16

I would talk to a counselor about this first. You need to seek help to cope with the pain and suffering you have kept bottled up. If you in fact did this, and are still getting treatment, great! The reason I say treatment first, is you need to be in a good headspace to deal with this. There *will* be a huge fallout. It *will* divide the family. Your counselor can help in three ways: 1) they will help you cope with the additional feelings of trauma you'll have, possibly as severe as it's happenin…
/r/MensRights20/01/22 08:10 PM
4

Does that mean I can call my boss honky and cracker in the meeting?
/r/MensRights20/01/22 03:24 PM
9

Don't air your dirty laundry to the public, regardless of gender. Share your feelings with close friends, and a significant other. If your close friends ridicule / cancel you, then you are with the wrong friends. If your significant other ridicules you, you are with the wrong significant other. It's a good way to make sure you only surround yourself with quality people.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 12:15 PM
3

I wouldn't call millennials 'young people who have limited life experience.' There's some millennials that are 40+ now. I myself am 38 and while I haven't experienced everything (who has experienced 'everything?'), I wouldn't say I'm limited.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 12:13 PM
3

One could argue that suicide is a side effect of having to suppress (sorry, 'control') their emotions.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 12:08 PM
7

There's plenty of stories here of women abusing / killing children and having almost no consequences. So, I don't know how much people react in that instance.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 12:07 PM
5

It's hit or miss. I've definitely seen (and used) them. However I do not know if it's more, less, or the same as women's bathrooms since I don't go in there. I do know I get an earful whenever I'm out with my wife and she goes to change our kid's diaper and there isn't one in the women's, so there's plenty of women's that don't have them too. I'm also in the US.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 01:25 PM
3

Absolutely leave feedback. Do not be rude, do not have an attitude. Be 100% professional so they have to take you seriously. If they don't, then you know the type of place you work for. This reminds me of some training I did back in 2007 for a company I worked for. It was around generational differences in the work place. They had a whole PowerPoint presentation, including various "traits" for each generation (Boomer, gen X, millennial, etc). This was the first time they did it, so they left lik…
/r/MensRights16/12/21 01:07 PM
409

Check out the book Disclosure, by Michael Crichton. It's about a man who is sexually harassed by his female boss, and the horrible situation he goes through being a man claiming sexual harassment against a woman. That book is ahead of its time.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 10:15 PM
2

As soon as I read the post I thought, her behavior sounds like she has depression. You may feel unappreciated in your job, but she probably feels trapped, all day, every day, never ends. He should let her go out with friends as well, and possibly go to counseling.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 06:21 PM
8

Make sure to document everything you do when you first start. And document every lift session after that. Now you can compare yourself to yourself, which is all that matters. If you see progress, you will get motivated. You will never see progress if you don't document.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 02:23 AM
3

Yes it physically makes me ill thinking about it. I am a parent of 3 children, and I would want anyone to save them if they were in immediate danger. But I can't fault a man for not helping them based on society today. Even discussing this as a comment causes me anxiety. I hate that I feel this way but an accusation of messing with children would destroy a man's life.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 06:43 PM
3

If you are dead set on having the discussion with her, the only *possible* way of getting through to her is with facts backed by citations. You will need to find cited studies showing different stats about this. Another commenter mentioned how 30% of men are still virgins at the age of 30. Stats like that would prove her wrong and if you have the link to the study, it'd be hard for her to refute that with logic. If she comes back with a generic "must be bad study" or whatever without reading it,…
/r/MensRights07/12/21 06:14 PM
2

Unfortunately with someone like this, no response at all would change her mind. She is set in her ways, probably regurgitating all the info she gets in her stove-piped feeds, and that's that. It's best to block her / unfollow / whatever and move on.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 06:09 PM
10

It's not easy to do by any stretch, but you need to end the friendship. This is very abusive on her part. Women do not understand that just an accusation of rape can ruin a man's life in the court of public opinion. I do not let myself be alone with any woman that is not my wife unless I know them really well, and my wife does too. I also would never, ever be alone with a child I am not related to, even if they were asking for help. It makes me sick to not help a child in need, but I am just too…
/r/MensRights07/12/21 06:05 PM
2

That and one of the creators is Jewish, the other is Catholic (they make fun of Catholics too). So the creators are making fun of their own cultures.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 12:08 PM
3

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me. Martin Niemöller ​ Seems this day in age, men need to be added to that list.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 10:31 PM
2

While you are technically correct, if she has a bruise and you don't, you know that you're getting arrested and not her. Men are not allowed to defend themselves except against other men (as long as they're a straight man).
/r/MensRights24/11/21 10:27 PM
1

I *might* be able to say it's not harassment if she did it privately, just a quick check of the waist band (not pulling pants down). *Maybe*. The behavior you described, is absolutely harassment, public humiliation, and she should be fired at a minimum, if not arrested. It's disgusting to publicly humiliate anyone, especially young children for whom you are the authority figure. I'm so sorry you had to go through this.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 10:25 PM
2

Another big one is domestic violence. Either the men are wimps or they did something wrong and deserved it. And heaven forbid a man defends himself in that situation...
/r/MensRights24/11/21 07:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter