TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Meme_Devil12388 Archive

View 0 posts and 266 comments by Meme_Devil12388 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

No, they won’t. “Just take your metaphorical ball and leave!” is a tacit admission of defeat, because if they could defend the husband experience (being a glorified roommate with rapidly dwindling amounts of sex, really) on its own merits, they would. But since they can’t, they have to rely putting the onus on men to avoid such a crappy deal, rather than criticize the women for offering such a crappy deal. Because gender bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 08:04 PM
1

Feminists pulling the fire alarm at an MRA event blows a giant hole in your “hur dur MRA apathy narrative”, but since you can’t justify that on its own merits, you had to try to deflect with a trite “ok, and?” add on.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 07:54 PM
–

FATALITY
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 12:35 PM
1

Do you think you’re being witty in moronically tacking-on that “Ok, and?”
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 07:49 AM
3

yes, why do you expect feminists to initiate and fight your battles? Because they self-appoint themselves as the ultimate/only valid gender equality movement. Ergo, it’s a complimentary responsibility. But even if not that, it’s worth exposing the hypocrisy, which then leads to a loss of trust. You didn't solve our issues, why do you think we owe it to you to solve yours? Props for having the Freudian slip to admit every male ally who ever lived, who played a crucial part in the fight for women’…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 10:15 PM
-1

Oh goody, grinding away just so one can be marginally more appealing to some woman whose attraction is spurred primarily by anxiety caused by degrading facial collagen and desiccating eggs.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 01:34 AM
2

Or you could just…not put out.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 05:11 AM
-1

Easy. Man doesn’t act pushy/demanding/controlling(no my-way-or-the-highway attitude about date plans, no pressuring for sex, no kissing on the first date(s) unless there is enthusiastic consent). Which eventually incites “The Ick” because the woman sees this as un-masculine.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 12:15 PM
1

This the beat rebuttal you can muster?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 11:46 PM
5

So much for “husband material” being objectively superior to a one-night-stand.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 01:33 AM
1

See: male teachers stuck collecting dust in the so-called “Sexual Marketplace”.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 07:56 PM
1

Being “nice”/agreeable is an important quality of attraction for women to men. Nice GuysTM project that, which is why they think being “nice” is a major selling point in their own attractiveness to women. It’s the same way with this topic. Guess what’s attractive to women? Advanced degrees and/or prestigious, high-earning careers. So these girl bosses think being a man with breasts should allow them to have their pick of the metaphorical litter-they think of themselves as hot commodities, after …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 07:46 PM
2

While it’s true that one’s morality, and one’s “personality”, are not completely synonymous, it’s actually very practical and easy to learn about someone’s personality by their ethics. Hits you unnecessarily? Selfish, easily angered, animalistic, maybe even sadistic Controlling? Cluster B’s, take your pick Lying? Manipulative, untrustworthy, etc. Etcetera, etcetera… It’s so basic and common-sense. I have to wonder if blue-pillers acting like this, is just their way of rationalizing-away outward …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 07:09 PM
2

You won’t get a decent answer, either. “Toxic masculinity” is a shibboleth of cluster B personality disorder radfems, which is why their definition of “non-toxic” masculinity is, invariably, a man who’s an easily exploited workhorse who exists only to help others. That, and because of their warped sense of gender equality/gender non-essentialism, they’re not comfortable with assigning positive traits to men exclusively. That would make women deficient in one or more ways, after all. So at best t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 12:45 PM
1

One thing that cracks me up about feminists is when they excuse women sexually harassing and/or assaulting men on the grounds that “the patriarchy” brainwashed them into thinking: “women are harmless and powerless, men aren’t, therefore it’s okay”. Women have zero free will and/or critical thinking skills, apparently. Men, however, do. Which is why it’s fair to get them socially ostracized for saying gendered slurs and/or making dongle jokes. Because they have the capacity to know better. Even t…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 03:05 AM
2

Moronic rationalization on her part.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 02:58 AM
4

You’re not going to get an honest answer. “Just date other women, 4head,” was only ever a last resort excuse to absolve women of accountability. It’s basically PPD women’s version of men’s “choose better”, and, well…we all know what they think of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 11:45 PM
1

Refusing to go on dates where you’re expected to pay in entirety and/or date demanding, entitled women is a pretty good initial filtering practice to avoid being settled for; thus, past partners shouldn’t be much of a concern, if that’s what one’s worried about. Now, if she’s a single mom and/or classifies you as “husband material”, on the other hand…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 12:26 AM
3

You could’ve just cited an example, like an American Black guy going to mainland China and getting heckled with racist jokes, like being given a banana and then taunted with monkey impressions. It’s not even a hypothetical. By woke liberal standards, that wasn’t racist, because the Chinese had no systemic power and/or privilege over New World Blacks. Of course, that’s a load of bullshit, but a woke liberal, when confronted with this, would then be forced to admit racism-sorry, “prejudice”-is bad…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 04:37 PM
3

“The fact that you don’t like how assholes get more romantic success than yourself, a self-professed ‘Nice Guy’, is proof that you aren’t actually nice.” A common blue-piller refrain. Which also contains the contradiction: if it’s true that the Nice GuyTM is just a Machiavellian manipulator who is nice only to get laid, he would just try to emulate being an asshole-a red-piller, basically-instead of lamenting how being his true, kind self is a detriment to his dating efforts. But Cluster B radfe…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 08:30 PM
0

Not not beating the gold-digging allegations. Definitely beating the more intelligent and/or socially savvy gender allegations though, considering how bad of a job of hiding their moronic entitlement OP and their defenders are doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 05:09 PM
7

That, and/or they’re just misandrist shit heads who pathologize anything a given man says and/or does, hence why they’re always interpreting everything in the worst possible way, regardless of how much of a stretch it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 11:08 PM
4

That was basically bluepill’s version of “choose better”; and we all know how they react to redpill’s version. Which is why they’re titanic morons whenever they play this card.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 08:05 PM
10

You responded to me and not the other guy for a reason: They were more thorough in describing how stupid it is to claim men are liked for personality and/or decent morals, but then admit chad can jettison the value of it all just by passing the pretty privilege check.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 11:53 AM
15

That’s what’s funny about bluepillers: They’ll (usually accurately) criticize Nice GuysTM for having overly simple, incorrect views on the dating scene…and then peddle black-and-white theories, like this, that are riddled with contradictions , themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 11:44 AM
–

Funny how the “I’m/they’re worried about safety.” excuse doesn’t apply to White women clutching their purses around Black people. It goes either way too, bluepillers. Whether or not Human males are innately and uncontrollably violent (they aren’t), you seem to think women’s unfounded paranoia is justified for its own sake. Which is really just their cluster B nueroticism, but that’s beside the point. Meaning, it shouldn’t matter if Black crime stats are overinflated due to systemic racism. Accor…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/25 08:18 PM
–

FATALITY
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/25 08:00 PM
5

This is the real kicker. Which is why entitled women using pregnancy as a demand for lopsided effort and/or spent money from a stranger on a dating app is very, shall we say, Trisomy 21-afflicted.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 01:55 AM
22

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 11:48 AM
0

Because the women who say that sort of stuff are some combination of: • Ridden with one or more Cluster B personality disorders. • Totally engorged with “true crime” podcasts and/or documentaries and/or fiction, which makes them think violent crime is more common than it is. • Sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 01:12 PM
13

It cracks me up when women admit 80/20 is real when they say things like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 11:43 PM
2

“Socio-economic status doesn’t entail a power imbalance.” Except for when it’s fame, apparently. Otherwise, how, exactly, is it “predatory” for a famous musician to have consensual hookups with one or more groupies? Unless some of you are ready to admit the “predatory” accusation(s) is/are really just bitter whining about no commitment from said musician(s).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 12:26 AM
–

I noticed an even worse pattern. A common excuse women use to justify not initiating with/asking out men is something along the lines of: “If I do that, they’ll exploit/abuse me.” Think about it. When women take initiative, and thus pursue their true preference(s), they often pick a manipulative/abusive asshole. Think about what that says. Of course, I’ve also seen about equally as many anecdotes where the woman initiated and got with a great guy(according to her). So it could very well be a pat…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 11:23 AM
–

Case in point: Don Lemon getting fired for saying Nikki Haley was “past her prime”.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 02:31 AM
1

I crack-up at women wanting a “leader” reasoning that they can’t handle the “mental load” of planning dates and/or communicating openly. And of course, such a mentally weak and/or stupid person doesn’t realize how embarrassing it is to admit this.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 10:29 PM
2

Bingo; that’s the acid test. I’ve never asked my previous girlfriends about their weights because the specific values never mattered. She was either attractive or she wasn’t, which is a purely instinctive judgement. Which really says a lot about women who have specific height and/or income requirements.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 10:38 PM
1

Oh of course she’s that nuerotic.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/25 08:51 PM
1

Her own abject sexism. She’s already pigeon-holed you as some entitled, unworthy asshole for (supposedly) being below average height, but still (supposedly) thinking yourself superior to overweight women. The questioning after she made that decision was merely a formality. Why? Chances are, she’s projecting. She’s the one who has contempt for short men, which is why it really struck her nerve to see a (supposedly) short man have the audacity act like he was better than a fat woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/25 08:41 PM
1

Sharp_Engineering380, coming soon in all her passive aggressive, Mary Koss-defending glory.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/25 08:34 PM
2

What a surprise: she dodged the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/25 12:38 AM
1

Boom, headshot.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 09:33 AM
1

Nothing ever happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 12:10 PM
1

It’s always funny to see a certain type of political ideologue (we both know which one) lament how Democracy is important and/or must be protected proceed to trash populism in the same breath.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 12:05 PM
7

If desperation is unattractive, how is love-bombing supposed to work?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 09:57 AM
7

Boom, headshot.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 09:03 PM
18

“Men are responsible for their own (supposed) oppression, because a minuscule minority of men in the ruling class centuries ago created draft laws, circumcision laws, parental custody laws, and laws making female-on-male rape legal.” “Cool. So can we blame Black people for chattel slavery, since they were sold to New Worlders mostly by other Africans?” “…”
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 10:31 PM
–

“Pay for the date because pregnancy and childbirth are debilitating.” Not only is this argument nuerotic as fuck, it’s making relationships much more transactional than most other in-sells.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 08:25 AM
2

R.I.P. to your boy friend when the new relationship/honeymoon phase hormones subside, and the lack of sexual attraction on your part turns him into a good roommate at best in your eyes.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 07:14 AM
1

“We never said looks don’t matter.”
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 02:43 AM
15

So how about condemning it with the rest of the men, instead of deflecting criticism against it? Unless you’re ready to admit you really don’t care, either.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 01:05 AM
2

C: It’s a not-even-a-month old troll account.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 12:29 PM
1

Closest I could find was this.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 12:41 AM
–

Fuckin’ gottem’.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 07:32 PM
2

Next time someone makes a thread attacking some seven year old, 2018 redpill comment feel free to call it out as rage bait. I don’t agree with major rep-pillers much, and I don’t like any of them; so I won’t, because I don’t have an ideological bent that makes me want to deflect criticisms against them by calling their “content” rage bait. You, however…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 05:08 AM
3

So what if it’s rage bait? If your underlying assertion to flippantly dismissing it as rage bait is that it’s un-important internet shit, then I have to ask why the also terminally online redpill shit warrants criticism instead of an op-ed in a major reporting brand. Better yet, why even come into this subreddit at all, if that’s what you truly believe?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:52 AM
9

In before they play the “It’s just rage bait!” card. An excuse that never seems to work for the redpill.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 08:13 PM
4

It’s pretty funny to see rad-fems try to absolve Mary Koss of excluding female-on-male rapes from data sets by highlighting how the FBI independently agreed with her diagnosis. “Mary Koss said female-on-male rape isn’t actually rape; that’s terrible.” “Um actually the FBI thinks that too. Checkmate, in-sell chud.” That’s how it usually goes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 07:36 PM
2

I have to ask what you think of those who sold African slaves to the triangle traders.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 11:53 PM
4

It’s really stupid to see it claimed that the worst FDS-type IG and TikTok influencers are just insignificant schmucks who do it for attention… …in a heated gender wars subreddit. Aside from Andrew Tate, red-pillers are just as insignificant. But that excuse never works for them. Somehow.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 10:27 AM
4

There are plenty of anecdotes for this, too. Getting the ick over seeing him crying. Losing attraction over going dutch on date bills. Losing arousal after being explicitly asked for consent. Still expecting him to be the breadwinner.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 06:11 PM
10

Lol at everyone failing to realize this is a post for poking holes in the bluepillers’ idea of a dating meritocracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 11:17 PM
–

“Just because I’m not having sex with you doesn’t mean I’m uninterested; stop being insecure, in-sell.”
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 08:10 PM
21

In other words: 80/20 vindicated again.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 05:45 PM
1

Ah, that’s makes sense now. I acknowledge you aren’t one of them, but I still disagree with those who insist leaving a sex-less relationship meant the one who left cared only about sex. See: the bathroom-less house analogy
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 10:37 AM
2

Would you like to live in a house without a bathroom-no toilet, bathtub/shower/combination, no sink? That’s a romantic relationship without sex: missing a vital piece; a piece so vital you’d reject the whole thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 10:25 AM
1

I’m going to paste a good criticism, made by someone else, of why FDS advice is idiotic: Talk about wanting to be married BUT don’t include him in the picture. Say things like ‘oo this is the type of dress I want to wear for my wedding with my husband’ any points about marriage make it seem like he is not included or apart of your future plan to get married. He will realize he’s easily disposable and fall in line “Protip [plural form of a slur that rhyme with droid] from a man that’s getting mar…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 02:26 AM
4

It was Tara Reade, actually. The hypocrisy of accusing her of lying would’ve been too blatant.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 10:00 AM
1

It’s so simple, and yet they never seem to think about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 11:51 AM
0

80/20 vindicated again. Since that’s the best explanation for why there’s such a famine of men attractive enough to even have an opportunity to pass this supposedly infernal bar.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 05:21 PM
20

True, every now and then I’ll get an Instagram reel where it’s a girl complaining something along the lines of “I gave the ‘medium ugly’ guy a ‘chance’ and still got ‘played’.”
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 12:46 AM
1

Real. I manipulated a starter girlfriend for my first time specifically to avoid that failure tag.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 02:23 PM
5

Ding-ding-ding! Betcha this is the main reason a good number of them don’t elaborate much, if at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 08:15 AM
6

Yep. Even the most gracefully aging woman has to contend with a shrinking fertility window. Hence the dishonesty.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 06:45 AM
12

This is really just proof of how some blue-pillers are misandrist shitheads who pathologize anything a man says or does. Because, as you pointed-out, there’s no way for a given man to try to connect romantically without it being some form of predation. Bonus: They have to admit The WallTM is real in order for this accusation to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 06:41 AM
3

Don’t waste their time by entertaining a date in which they’re made to invest significantly more effort to maybe negotiate attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 08:57 PM
–

Right, I’ve never seen anyone else criticize this double standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 12:40 AM
1

Hear, hear. Also, being “safe” has its own risk(s): Eventually boring the woman and/or making her spoiled because she takes the relationship for granted.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 11:56 PM
5

What is it with these girls and finding so many single guys to be “friends” with. Aside from obvious free attention, it could also be because male friends usually won’t constantly try to mentally torment her as part of one-upmanship in a friend group’s social hierarchy/become a “frenemy”.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 12:09 PM
0

That’s right. And yet it’s only terminally-online legbeards with one or more cluster B personality disorders that feel the need to compare men as a whole to bears, despite empirical evidence suggesting men are at a far greater risk. Curious, that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 02:51 AM
6

Legit. It baffles me that so many fail to understand how bad it is for someone to need to try to negotiate attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 02:22 PM
–

I noticed it too. I just witnessed a post in r/nicegirls that was basically a girl being a sex-inverted Nice GuyTM, insulting a guy for supposedly leading her on in a year-long friendship. The guy ultimately admitted he only ever saw her as a friend, and there were loads of comments sympathizing with the girl; justifying her insult by saying she was “hurt”.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 08:23 AM
-3

Lmao at all these ass-blasted women bleating in the comments, as if they wouldn’t string-along some feckless schmuck, for whom they have marginal romantic interest in at best, for free benefits and validation.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 11:47 AM
14

Those undesirables shouldn’t drop-out, otherwise so many women would lose so much attention and/or uncompensated favors. Thus showing who’s really “entitled”.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 01:21 AM
9

“You should be content with being single.” and/or “Romance is a want, not a need.” are some common blue-pill sayings, so it’s funny to see them suddenly renege on them, as evidenced by them deigning to complain about a lack of men. Which wouldn’t be a problem if they genuinely believed the aforementioned platitudes. Second, this post is just further proof that blue-pillers accusing men of “entitlement” is really just projection, because it’s true entitlement to just lazily sit back and demand me…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 01:19 AM
–

One of my favorite proofs of 80/20 is women judging their hundreds of options as unworthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 11:49 PM
–

There’s nothing wrong with that sentiment. And even if it were, it’s still ethically and logically superior to constantly getting used by people out of one’s league, never learning how to avoid that, and then condemning an entire sex because of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 11:46 PM
1

“People are allowed to have preferences.” unless that includes a low-N woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 06:49 PM
1

Tell us more about that almost-rapist story.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 01:37 AM
4

Because they’re extremely nuerotic.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/24 07:48 AM
–

“Stop being insecure, if she wasn’t attracted she wouldn’t even bother.”
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 02:05 PM
5

A lot of these responses are supremely neurotic. “I’ll feel inferior to women who don’t have to approach.” This is why insecurity accusations from women are a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 11:09 AM
2

They’re always batting out of their leagues for you, aren’t they?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 11:04 AM
2

That’s actually one of the funnier proofs of the popularity of “Dark Triad”. When women make the first move-and thus try to achieve their true preference(s)-they often get with a manipulative and/or abusive asshole. Think about what that says.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 11:03 AM
8

Legit. “Stay in a tortuous relationship that leaves you romantically unfulfilled, or you aren’t actually nice.” Dudes on something
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 02:17 AM
–

Lol gottem’.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 12:35 AM
1

No, don’t agree with this cluster B schmuck. The girl could’ve just told OP she wasn’t interested, or even just ghosted, instead of leading him on and wasting his time. But, cluster B, so being considerate of others is beyond their comprehension.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/24 09:16 PM
11

The excuse-making for the girl hilarious. If she truly wasn’t interested, she could’ve politely informed OP as much, instead of just leading him on until she pulls an obvious excuse. But FDS cluster B narcissists have no concept of mutual cooperation or mindfulness of others, so they, of course, see no issue with needlessly wasting his time.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/24 01:01 AM
-1

Nice job on outing yourself for using multiple accounts.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 08:14 PM
–

You’re right. Which is why that whole, “I need my own stash/‘go bag’ in case you suddenly become abusive and I need to abruptly leave you.” thing is really just an excuse and/manipulation tactic.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 11:13 PM
4

This is the clicker. Feminists appoint themselves as authorities on human socio-gender relations-it’s an academic discipline, even,-so it’s fair to criticize them for a lack in advocacy in sexual crimes against males.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 12:13 AM
3

Props for baiting the red-pillers into exposing their moronic hypocrisy about social pressure (semantic squabbles over what it means to be “allowed” to think and/or do something).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 05:08 PM
9

This is exactly why the “I wouldn’t be dating him if I wasn’t interested.” maxim they keep spouting isn’t convincing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 09:01 PM
6

Saying that getting offended by anti-male sexism is a bad sign/saying that good men wouldn’t take it personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 02:48 AM
9

Props for decimating this clown.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 11:39 PM
25

A goalpost shift, what a surprise.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 07:24 PM
1

There was an askfeminists thread about some dipshit named Mary Koss saying female-on-male rape isn’t rape, but rather “unwanted contact”. One moronic user kept trying to justify that idiocy by saying Koss was wrong, but not hateful. “Callouss, perhaps,” they said. So yeah, you dodged worsening lunacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 09:47 AM
12

You’re right. Blue-pillers will reluctantly admit that looks matter, but they never seem to entertain the idea that a given guy could be romance-less due to a lack of looks and/or height.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 07:09 PM
2

Yeah, their hints are really stupid. Extended eye contact, really?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/24 07:29 PM
1

Pinnacle example.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/24 07:28 PM
7

I have to wonder why women would bother with men at all, if women are convinced that all men are such pugnacious assholes. Which really goes to show that they are, indeed, hamster-ing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/24 07:16 PM
4

10-day-old account with a provocative username and flair. Need I say more?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/24 03:41 AM
14

Hey blue-pillers, OP is playing devil’s advocate with your worldview. You believe in a dating meritocracy where anyone who fails in romance deserves that fate due to one or more deficiencies. Meaning, the hypothetical man was alone all his life because he was an unattractive loser. So when he finally achieves financial success-in this scenario, the only changed variable-and women start noticing him, logically he can infer it’s only because of his money. Even if we’re wrong, you can’t blame him f…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 11:02 PM
1

Acting noticeably upset/pouting, denying it when asked about it, and then getting angry at the person who asked for taking you at your word is really damn immature, yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 11:49 AM
7

I have to wonder why so many women in this thread are getting bent-up over such an inconsequential lie. Only I’m not really wondering: they’re disgusted by older male virgins, but admitting as much looks bad, so that’s why they focus on the lie so much. It wouldn’t really matter if older male virgins wasn’t an issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/24 11:57 PM
0

You could’ve just reposted the thread where several decently-upvoted women claimed they wouldn’t have sex with a 30-or-older virgin. It’s actually the top comment in this thread, as of this typing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/24 11:47 PM
2

Chad as fuck, props for annihilating those dumbasses.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/24 08:51 AM
1

The OP TikToker liked a comment calling the vid “satire”. A lie, almost certainly, but maybe we should play devil’s advocate and still point-and-laugh at Windmill for trying to support what is (supposedly) being satirically mocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 09:44 PM
-1

Unfalsifiable maxims, the FDS PPD woman’s favorite. At which point they should be confronted with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 11:23 PM
–

Yeah, blue-pillers are really damn stupid. The smartest thing for them to do was to accuse you of fabricating the story completely. That way, they wouldn’t have to contradict themselves in accusing you of being meritocratic-ally dealt a deserving fate while omitting how you still achieved a significant other. Because then they’d have to admit that Human romance isn’t fair and/or is significantly chaotic/luck-based. It’s especially hilarious how they accused you of being some maladjusted, narciss…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/24 08:12 PM
36

40 years later, when I’m a successful professional and she’s on disability after her knee replacement surgeries didn’t go so well, she contacted me to “catch up”. Lmao, the shamelessness of that. Also lmao at the blue-pillers who keep insisting this is just a “revenge fantasy”.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 05:29 PM
–

You’re dodging because you know you’d get exposed.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 07:33 PM
5

Lol it’s so fucking simple. Yet blue-pillers will perform mental gymnastics to demonize men and say thinking like this is “entitlement” and/or “manipulation”.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 07:03 PM
1

Lmao, legit. Watched the TikTok without peeping the OP, then realized it must’ve been yet another Windmill Flowers post. Lo and behold…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 11:37 PM
1

Some of you are pretty quick to throw entitlement accusations at any male who expresses even a little frustration with dating; as in, you think any kind of disappointment is indicative of entitlement. So yeah, firing back with accusations of entitlement against women who are (justifiably btw) miffed at getting “pumped-‘n-dumped” makes sense, if not being cruel as fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 09:00 AM
2

Lol it’s like Christopher Hitchens realizing waterboarding is torture only after he experiences it first hand. And his fans eat it up like it’s some profound demonstration of intellectual honesty, as if normal people can’t comprehend prolonged drowning being tortuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 01:21 AM
10

There’s a great analogy someone made about this: not buying an entire house because it lacks a bathroom. No one buys a house solely for a bathroom, but said house would be nearly worthless without one.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 08:05 PM
1

Case in point:
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 02:01 PM
2

This is it precisely. Blue-pillers always provocatively ask how a man can tell that a woman would reject said man when he was younger, as if he doesn’t have a hundreds-strong sample set/pattern that is extremely different from what he experiences presently. It’s even funnier when one considers how blue-pillers believe in a dating meritocracy, where that man being ignored until his 30’s is a result of one or more flaws, rather than rotten luck. Suddenly luck exists when women start noticing him a…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 07:35 AM
–

“Too many pills woman” 😭
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 06:56 PM
–

That one post where OP said she puts-on makeup as a hobby, and also argued that she shouldn’t have to pay for dates on the grounds that she put-on makeup, didn’t clue you in sooner? Edit: ask for that post in PM’s if you want the source.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 06:50 PM
5

Thanks for finally pointing that out. They’re moronically obsessed with acting like it’s a black-and-white dichotomy of CEO corporate jockey or financially dependent near-slave, no in-between. I have to wonder if the realize how weak their argument is if they admit it isn’t that simple, hence why they try to assert it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 02:00 PM
1

Instagram women are hilariously moronic in how oblivious to telling on themselves they are, when they make complaints like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 06:22 AM
0

Lol, almost certainly not.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 08:11 PM
–

My starter girlfriend couldn’t tell I was just using her, and I’m not some kind of master manipulator. Not even little. As for trust? She still hasn’t bothered to delete her nudes from our saved Snapchat, years after our breakup.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 01:33 PM
6

What you described is known as “Apex Fallacy”.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 02:54 AM
1

Doubling-down on insisting that the ancient marine reptile Kronosaurus queenslandicus was a Dinosaur. Even after showing her a museum website page clarifying that. “Well it doesn’t explicitly say it’s not a Dinosaur.” she said.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 03:10 AM
2

She was almost certainly trying to hamster a way to blame you for that, and went with magical bad kisser pre-cognition. Since the “Well um how did you know she was promiscuous before???” card wouldn’t work.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 10:51 PM
61

Blue pill dumbasses are real quiet on this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 11:35 PM
1

Haven’t gotten it yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 09:43 PM
4

Do you feel that you are being insulting when you are more attracted to thin, pretty, well-put-together women than you are to fat, slobbish, ugly women? No, because I don’t make character judgments onto them based solely on that, nor do I impugn them for a lack of romantic success based on a silly notion of a just world. I know “looks” are paramount, now. How many physically unattractive women did you fall in love with for their personality alone? At least one. Being decently nice to me goes a l…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 07:16 PM
2

It was actually pretty good at first; she was very nice to me, wasn’t a demanding, spoiled brat, didn’t write me off for being autistic. But that was all because of the Halo Effect, and because I think she knew, at least subconsciously, that I was the best she was ever going to get. Or in other words, I was significantly out of her league. I ended the relationship because she became increasingly needy, which would’ve been fine if it weren’t for how much she started to bore me for being too much …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 07:05 PM
1

Just about all of my other options were more attractive than the starter girlfriend, even if only slightly. One even tried to use me to cheat on her boyfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 06:51 PM
12

I think "personality" meant very little because, in terms of bluepill thought, my "personality" was supposed to be paramount, such that all of the corporeal "self-improvement" would result in a slight uptick in romantic interest *at best*. That, and also because it was the only significantly changed variable. I had the same fashion, same hairstyle, same height, same race, same location...*same high-functioning autism*. A neat little one-variable change to narrow it down enough to know it's wasn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 06:00 AM
109

Yes. Happened to me. I’m undoubtedly going to be called a narcissist for thinking like this, but after “self improvement” all that really changed about me was that I was leaner with better muscle definition. I still felt like the same person, same “personality” and everything. So when I started getting exponentially more romantic interest, I felt insulted. Because from my point of view, all I did was give myself superficial changes. My sense of self was too strong to feel like a different person…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 01:48 AM
0

Yep, it’s moronic to demand things from someone you won’t provide yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 10:04 AM
0

Hey ladies, you have piss-poor reading comprehension skills if your takeaway from this post is: “Lower your standards just ‘cause.”
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 10:02 AM
0

I’m predicting that they’re going to accuse you of omitting one or more details from your story.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 07:57 PM
–

Yep, I manipulated a girl as a starter girlfriend precisely because of this sentiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 06:38 PM
–

Lmao of course she fucking dodged the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 06:32 PM
10

That line is a lie, true. But if it wasn’t, it’d mean that moronic “women mature faster than men” maxim is a crock of shit. Which it already is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 11:19 PM
5

Boom, headshot.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 05:43 AM
3

I was, actually. Which should’ve made it more obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 03:29 AM
6

My starter girlfriend couldn’t tell I was just using her for experience, so yes, they’re pretty bad at detecting “desperation”.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 12:08 AM
3

Not gonna lie, I’m riding a dopamine rush from knowing you clowned on those dip-shits.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 08:14 AM
–

Hey ladies, if you truly don’t care if a man refuses to “chase”, then you wouldn’t deign to try insulting him for it. I.E. suggest he’s un-masculine and/or cowardly. Because that definitely comes across as lashing-out. If not just manipulative.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 09:02 AM
–

And the bloated forearm? Y’know, the decidedly stocky wrist, and everything preceding it?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 07:02 AM
–

Almost certainly Mary Koss’ sham of a study-if it can even be called that. Still, it would leave a whopping 3/4 chance of the male being harmless. I very much doubt it’s a worse chance than what the hypothetical beat would give.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 10:07 AM
9

A pretty good example of WaW is how often a story in which the woman(en) is/are indisputably in-the-wrong gets called an incel false-flag/creative writing exercise. That kind of skepticism is much more rare in the male versions.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 06:18 AM
2

Where did this myth of "guys hate women because they didn't get with Stacy" come from? Dollars-to-donuts this is yet another giant beam of projection and/or entitlement on their part. That, or it’s another hypothetical role-reversal.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 09:29 AM
–

But Louis Farrakhan bad! Social considerations of insults don’t matter if the target is bad enough, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 10:52 PM
–

Fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 10:49 PM
–

Would it be okay to call Louis Farrakhan the N-word? Or any other sufficiently immoral black person, take your pick.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 10:47 PM
7

It’s true though. Ever see those short vlog-style videos where some woman complains about men being oblivious to hints? The complaint is always that the man misses the hint(s), not that he’s not reciprocating interest. Meaning, she thinks he’s interested, but won’t take on the woman’s plausible deniability-laden hint(s). Meaning, even if she thinks he likes her back, she’d still prefer he risk the rejection by asking her out, instead of him doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 07:51 PM
1

Hey ladies, I’ve been in a sex-inverted version of this kind of story. Get this: I didn’t expect the girl to still be my friend, and I didn’t hold it against her when she decided to end our association. Why? Because unlike you completely selfish dumbasses, I: 1.) Am not confused enough to think that romantic interest and objectification are identical. 2.) I don’t expect anyone to take rejection lightly. 3.) Know that unreciprocated feelings are bad for an otherwise platonic relationship. 4.) Ack…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 01:21 AM
3

Another banger response. I have to wonder why no one wonders if the guy in this story doesn’t just feel used.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 01:13 AM
–

Don’t try to be noble, you’d be entirely justified to resent her for using you like she did.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 05:26 PM
5

It’s a sort of black pill of its own when blue-pillers tell accomplished, responsible adults to try to change their behavior into something more akin to a smarmy college boy (or worse). Not to mention how hobbies, apparently, are worth jack-shit, now.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 08:24 AM
6

Lol at her reply. That’s how I know their barrage of entitlement accusations against men are more projection than anything else. Settle for less because “pussy is worth more than dick” 💀💀💀
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 08:21 AM
1

I’ve “self-improved” to the point where a girl tried to use me to cheat on her boyfriend. Unlike blue-pilled dumbasses who are totally gripped with the idea of a just world, I can admit that was possible only because I hit decent-enough rolls, so-to-speak, on the immutably genetic portions if myself: height, skull, maybe even race. I’d still be dead-in-the water if it weren’t for those, even if I weren’t such a fatass anymore. By-the-way, because of the aforementioned success, you blue-pillers w…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 07:58 AM
1

That’s exactly the point. “Personality” can’t really be evaluated, it’s really just the halo effect at work.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 05:19 PM
2

I have to wonder why none of the target people of this thread haven’t answered yet; only women who don’t even meet the first requirement.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 09:19 AM
1

Agreed. Not only does it give experience, it’s also a way to shed virginity and/or inexperience so that you won’t get written-off by the women one actually wants. I’m so glad to know I won’t get catch-22 rejected just for being inexperienced. It’s the entire reason I did it!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 11:36 PM
-1

Yep. It’s not a “revenge fantasy”. Even the most gracefully aging women will still have to contend with an ever-closing fertility window, and/or mounting mental trauma/baggage from unfulfilling relationships-if they can even be called that. Either of those are strong enough to make many women hard-settle for a man they couldn’t care less about when they were younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 09:59 AM
0

r/threadkillers
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 01:39 AM
1

Yeah, Instagram women are like the female equivalent of the worst 4chan neckbeards. It’s like a condensation trap of girlboss-ery and abject selfishness.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:00 AM
8

They’re pointing-out how hypocritical it is to accuse women of selfishness, while you justify deceiving them to get sex. Which is selfish.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 08:07 PM
-1

Watch, they’re gonna suggest that you be “authentic”-the implication being you already aren’t-and then add that your “authentic” self will reveal vague, subtle, non-specific things that (supposedly) decent women will notice, thus making all the bling-flashing unnecessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 07:56 PM
2

Yet another thread where women finally admit to the crappiness of dating norms, only when the sexes are inverted.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 05:24 PM
1

Interesting to see women finally admit to both 80/20 and the transactional nature of relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 05:44 AM
1

a hypocritical feminist rant on a syndicated radio show Was it that WERS interview, that had Mary Koss re-classifying female-on-male rape as “unwanted contact”?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 07:57 PM
11

Epic takedown. They’re almost certainly gonna pull another lame-ass solipsism again, though. Edit: fuckin’ called it
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 07:44 AM
2

It’s interesting to see all these women admit to the reality of settling when asked if it could happen to them. A stark contrast to when they’d still call a man an insecure buffoon for worrying being settled for, when he compares his previous, desert of a romantic life to his (supposedly) better one that coincidentally begins after he gets established in his career, and/or his cohort also reaches their 30’s.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 08:04 PM
3

Drop the pics please. In DM’s if nowhere else.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 07:59 PM
4

Crickets. What a shocker.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 08:40 AM
–

Watching these dumbass Rick and Morty meta-normative nihilists start having coughing fits from getting a taste of their own naturalistic fallacy medicine will never not be funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 09:59 AM
23

What’s funny is that many will deny that such a thing could happen (over-inflation of standards due to hook-ups with much more attractive males) but then say porn does the same for males.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 09:36 AM
3

Preach. Let the girl who gets the ick from using turn signals roast to death in a heap of flaming, warped metal (car crash).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 02:39 AM
–

Really wanna see how they goalpost shift against this one. Edit: stay seething femcels, your pathetic sealioning/feigned ignorance isn’t working this time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 08:14 PM
–

RIGHT ON CUE
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 08:06 PM
–

I’m cracking-up at all the women taking offense to this post, saying it’s a generalization. Like they don’t habitually drop crime statistics to demonize men as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 07:57 PM
2

Watch them tell you that you should ignore such complaining, without a modicum of self awareness.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 04:16 PM
1

All the women here taking this post personally is interesting, to say the least.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 04:13 PM
4

Can confirm, last girlfriend said I was “mysterious”, when actually I was just being anti-social with high-functioning Autism.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 02:26 AM
6

You’re right. It’s checking the attractive box that makes them hard to find.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 01:29 AM
–

I fucking love it when types like her go mask-off.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 08:38 PM
1

“Just don’t date [person with bad behavior], rather than make them stop said behavior!” is almost always unevenly levied. By both sexes. Men will tell women to not have sex with bad men; women will not do this, and instead demand men to be arbitrarily better for some metaphysical good. This never works, of course. Inversely, when men tell women to stop being entitled brats in demanding men pay for literally fucking everything in the dating phase, women shift blame and tell the men to avoid women…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 05:16 AM
2

Don’t forget about how at least 1/3 of the answers in this thread are fictional characters. Characters who are more-or-less like you describe. The pickings are that damn slim.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 01:39 AM
3

Legit, us men major drop bags for self-improvement too, but I am yet to see any of them seriously use it as a justification for entitlement to someone else footing the whole bill on expensive dates. Funny, that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 03:10 PM
1

Ay /u/StonyGiddens let’s get your take on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 08:35 PM
–

You did a bang-up job of proving them right by calling the man a “slime ball” for merely calling a woman “pretty etc.” (sic) and asking for her number.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/23 10:10 PM
–

That semantic squabble about what it means for something to be “allowed” gave that one’s low intelligence away.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/23 10:02 PM
6

They really fucking are. Which is why I always roll my eyes when they demand men ignore social pressures on them, like having to be overtly masculine, or grinding endlessly in the corporate world. They have absolutely zero room to point fingers, in that dimension. EDIT: While I’m at it, I’ll do a two-in-one for the inevitable imbecile(s) who will trot-out this all-too-common retort: “Just don’t conform to the social pressure(s), and deal with the unfair consequence(s), pussy.” Disregarding the i…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 05:30 AM
1

OP went on to prove you right when they commented that women will use mundane a “hey” as an opener on Bumble…to “match the energy” of the recipient.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 09:19 PM
–

Hey guys, if OP was supposed to ignore the earlier manipulation accusations-y’know, ‘cuz they’re dumbass internet strangers-why can’t you ignore OP in turn?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 04:10 PM
1

Agreed. Really speaks to any woman’s abysmally low intelligence, for her to think this is the only decent way to weed-out users. Which is what makes it seem more like an excuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 09:26 AM
-2

Legit. Why do these types never fucking realize this?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 09:18 AM
6

I love it when they tell on themselves by insisting that going 50/50 is losing on their end. Because, as you said, the guy’s money is what they care about the most-if not only.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 09:15 AM
1

Don’t forget all the comments insisting that it’s unfair to judge her based on this one video, even though she’s radiating more Karen energy than a nuclear reactor. All from the same people who will call you a basement-dwelling Discord mod who’s “entitled”, if you complain about online dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 12:35 PM
–

Legit happened to me. One ex-girlfriend admitted as much. I’m Autistic and anti-social. But to her? “Mysterious.”
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 12:01 PM
1

In a just, meritocratic world, I wouldn’t have been able to string-along my starter girlfriend for as long as I did.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 12:12 PM
–

They oh-so-conveniently neglect to acknowledge why such a man would be insecure, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 08:52 PM
3

Likewise, feminist women have empathy up until it requires reflecting on their own behavior or reconsidering their own advantages. Men's interests often contradict modern feminism's. Case in point: Mary P. Koss reclassifying female-on-male, drug-induced rape as mere “unwanted contact.” Source. Start at 8:15.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 03:58 AM
–

“Beta-buxxing isn’t real, you’re just an insecure manchild if you think you’re being used for provision.” Then we see posts like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 08:13 PM
–

Legit, the frequent griping women do about the quality of the majority of their dating app prospects is arguably the best non-numerical evidence of something like the 80/20 rule being real, even if it’s not in that exact ratio
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 08:23 AM
1

Great post! I always crack-up at morons who steadfastly deny that several one-night-stands with significantly more attractive people, who are met via a dating app, could ever over-inflate one’s standards. Then, in the same breath, they blame porn for imposing unrealistic ideas onto males.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 07:32 PM
3

Sick bod, homie. But yeah, the supply’s fucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 01:11 AM
5

No. And here’s a really succinct way to realize this: Ask yourself where “Nice Guys” got the idea that being nice/agreeable is a major attractor. Hint: It wasn’t other males.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 08:57 AM
–

This thread is great; definitely saving for the next blue-pill dumbass who tries to assert there’s no stigma around late-stage virginity in males. It’s also vindicates my choice of hard-settling for my first girlfriend; to use her to gain experience, and avoid this stigma.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 06:20 AM
1

Same here, actually. Disregarding the immorality of it, it’d also be a woefully massive chore to go against my nature like that, and have to play all these stupid Machiavellian mind games to stop my hypothetical partner from losing attraction to me for not being sufficiently masculine and/or domineering. Just imagine how much of a mental tax that would be. By the way, your story is a near-perfect example of why those same red-pillers go on about not trusting women/taking what they say at face va…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 01:45 AM
2

Red-pillers noticed that too, and that’s why they try intentionally instilling at least a little insecurity in their partners and/or “plates”. Usually with subtlety. They call doing this “Dread Game”.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 01:13 AM
2

It works because it prevents/reduces feelings of taking one for granted. That, and/or it cones across as being of higher value.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/23 12:22 AM
1

Blue-piller stupidity on display once again as they try to deny viewing romance as rational, and hoping we all forget about their soap boxing about how only horribly misogynistic basement dwellers can fail at romance.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 03:51 AM
1

It also really highlights how trite that stupid-ass “Self improvement is its own reward, and/or you should be doing it anyway, regardless of whether or not it increases your chances.” maxim is. Because she very clearly doesn’t feel the need to stay on that endless and grueling self-improvement hamster wheel, if she doesn’t need to.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/23 02:42 AM
9

Legit, the whole unfalsifiable “Genuine niceness never fails/never gets mistaken, therefore any self-proclaimed niceness in the unsuccessful isn’t real niceness!” maxim is stupid as shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 08:53 AM
3

Nothing funnier than women telling men to try to ignore and/or be unbothered by social pressures. Considering they’ve concocted entire movements to destroy theirs, usually rightly.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 01:17 AM
8

Legit, it’s still a depressing black-pill; to know that a confident and brash scumbag is still preferable to a reserved, well-behaved individual.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 05:43 AM
0

Why are so many struggling to understand that this post is a return-fire on the type of women who bring a mountain of demands, and no willingness to reciprocate?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 06:50 AM
0

Hilarious that the best you can do is deflect with a what-about-isn.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 06:46 AM
19

What’s funny is that the above claim essentially proves the red-pill concept of “dark triad” traits being attractive, since every time a woman initiates, she gets manipulated. Somehow. So they’re either picking those “dark triad” men, or most, if not all, men are like that. In which case, why bother with men at all? Unless, of course, it’s as you said: it’s all just a rationalization.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 01:27 AM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 06:09 AM
1

Is this supposed to be an inversion of the clueless simp/Nice GuyTM who does loads of favors for an uninterested women, then gets angry when it’s revealed she was using him? Because if so, great job. Lots of women like to say the simp should’ve known better. But, curiously, appeal to unspoken social contracts in this scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 01:48 AM
1

I think that a lot of it is male solipsism, too, as most men's simplest requirements for a relationship partner is that she is sexy and that she is nice. Obviously when men want to commit long term they usually require more than that. Exactly, and this is a major reason Nice GuysTM are the way they are. They value nicety in women, project that, and thus assume it’s a major bonus to their appeal. The inverse of this is the education and/or career-oriented women who think their advanced degree and…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 08:44 AM
4

You’re right in that calling it “maturity” is a lie-or at best, massive naivety. But there’s extra hilarity in playing devil’s advocate in assuming it’s true, and then taking that hypothetical truth to call into question that stupid “women mature faster than men and/or are naturally more mature.” maxim
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/23 05:37 PM
–

I’m really cracking-up at all the women balking at this idea, because they’re finally realizing why it’s bad to be the “beta bux”. Perhaps now they’ll stop insulting men who are afraid of being one, and/stop calling such fear an insecurity.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 07:03 PM
2

Most: 4 Least: 1 Is 4 Stephanie “Persephanii” Nelson?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/23 10:04 PM
–

It isn’t petty/immature/small-minded to get offended/upset/disillusioned at suddenly getting attention from the sex one is attracted to, after one has an ugly duckling transformation and/or gets a significant career advancement.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 03:04 AM
6

Chains like this are how I know it’s gaslighting when blue-pillers begrudgingly, and insincerely, admit that looks are important. Because they almost always attribute failure to a character flaw. Or something. Also lol at this fucking dog-shit reading comprehension, that they can’t tell you’re proposing a hypothetical.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 01:35 AM
1

Definitely a red flag, in their eyes. I disagree with that, but one either plays by the game’s rules, or doesn’t play at all. Which is why I hard-settled for my first girlfriend, so I could at least get some experience and, more importantly, remove the stain of being seen as some sort of weirdo loser for not having a LTR/hookup of any kind.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 06:56 PM
1

only a little attraction, rather than the passion she feels for the fuckboy that will probably just use her. I suspect this is the real, main driver behind the settling: women finally getting tired of emotionally unfulfilling relationships (if they can be called that), such that they decide to try the less attractive, less “exciting” men in hopes that they’ll get what they’ve been wanting, and lacking, for a long time.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/23 07:49 AM
1

Unverifiable anecdotes about short, bald(ing) janitors of South Asian descent “pulling” women effortlessly are enough to prove that personality > looks, according to blue pillers. These anecdotes, though? Not good enough. Somehow.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/23 09:17 AM
3

Don’t forget the immense amount of effort and discipline that is required to attain an attractive male body (exercise, hypertrophy, dieting). Which also includes chronic soreness/pain. Heck, considering all of that, it’s the make who really pays more to date-and not just financially.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 12:26 AM
2

Give-up on that user. They’re just gonna continue to shift goalposts, and/or act dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 11:40 PM
1

Well yeah, most men aren’t the ones pretending to be Sherlock Holmes clones who can deduce someone else’s character traits-flaws, especially-by glancing at them for five seconds. Or deduce as much, by noticing extremely subtle body language that they, and only they, can perceive. And that this all totally, definitely, legitimately isn’t just the halo and horn effects at work. When men tell women to “choose better”, there’s a decent chance they’re mocking the above concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/23 06:36 PM
5

The comments, on the other hand…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/23 04:26 PM
3

Same here, I’d be okay with that…they wouldn’t, though. So it won’t happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 07:08 AM
1

Why assume he was groomed? In that same comment, that user explicitly stated he “never felt exploited”.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/23 09:54 AM
10

I like to think some people stubbornly deny there could ever be such a thing as virtue signaling, because to admit it is real would bring them too close to admitting they, themselves, do it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/23 07:00 PM
12

Can confirm. I basically did an ugly duckling transformation, but my sense-of-self and/or identity was grounded/strong enough that I never felt like a different person. To a small extent, I silently seethed with contempt at how the halo effect was finally working in my favor, because in my mind, all I did was amplify myself in vain ways. I use “small extent” because the benefits of the halo effect made it really hard to go full misanthrope. This is also why I hate blue-pillers: they seriously un…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/23 07:48 AM
2

Legit, there’s something to be said about women negatively judging men for their insecurities/fears, when they’re (the women) just as gripped with them, often moreso.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/23 06:59 AM
8

Unironically a great retort.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/23 06:57 AM
–

I love how blue-pillers unwittingly agree with red-pill/black-pill concepts like 80/20 and/or beta-buxxing when they gloat about how women being able to earn enough money causes them to suddenly drop huge swaths of the make population.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/23 06:38 PM
6

Bingo. An already self-actualized, practical person can’t be tempted to bust even more ass for some other, arbitrary metaphysical goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 10:10 AM
10

Blammo!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 09:53 AM
1

The above is more-or-less implied when those who complain about loneliness almost always get met with accusations of being deficient in anything but looks. It’s the modus operandi of r/inceltear
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/23 09:17 AM
0

Can confirm, after fumbling so many women I thought were at-or-around my level I decided to bite the bullet and date a clinically obese woman I, apparently correctly, deduced to have a crush on me. I did so because the metaphorical clock was ticking, so I had to either: 1.) Risk fruitlessly holding-out for women I had any semblance of attraction to, which was very dangerous because I was nearing 24 and still hadn’t had a first real LTR. I was worrying that my inexperience would irreparably tar m…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/23 03:23 AM
10

Legit, 80/20 is likely exaggerated…but the fact that women making clear-cut proposals is so rare that many men think it doesn’t happen at-all really does show women are generally pickier.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/23 03:01 AM
7

Fuck, that was alpha-fucks-beta-bucks to a T. I really fucking wish blue-pillers would stop denying the existence of that dynamic. F for Derrick, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 03:17 AM
5

Don’t forget those not uncommon anecdotes of women describing how they eventually become attracted to a friend/acquaintance they know because said person grew on the woman, so-to-speak. Especially due to “personality”. That’s another dimension of people’s hypocrisy where they chastise the friends-first strategy, but keep insisting personality is the metaphorical silver bullet.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/23 02:38 AM
1

If the man has been preselected by a “low-quality” woman, such as one who other women consider unattractive or of low class, does preselection still play any role at all? No, it doesn’t. My first girlfriend was someone I wasn’t very attracted to; largely because she was obese. I got with her so I could break-out of incel-dom, and finally get a relationship under my belt, so that I wouldn’t be cursed with being a 24 year old virgin male without any relationship experience. Because, despite blue-p…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 06:59 PM
25

Yes, it indicates she’d be unattainable to them/wouldn’t be satisfied by them, so they give-up on her. That, and/or they (the men) reason they’d be facing insurmountable competition, so they decide to invest their effort onto women with whom they have better odds. That’s how I’d see it, anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 06:35 PM
14

My hairstyle. I accidentally got a buzz cut, and my work crush actually liked it a lot. When I got alone, I giggled like an idiot for 15 minutes after she said ”Nice haircut!” when she saw me with it. I still let my hair regrow, and went back to the nerdy side-part. Chaddest thing I’ve ever done.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 08:23 PM
35

Let’s see how consistent the “Women don’t owe men anything.” crowd is on this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 12:28 AM
4

It’s a copypasta.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 02:38 PM
4

It’s analogous to thinking that hating feminism means hating women and/or women’s rights, while pretending the real causes-thinking males can’t be raped, misandry isn’t real because power + privilege, puberty blockers for preteens, etc.-don’t exist. It’s a kind of motte-and-bailey, really.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 05:13 PM
1

Can confirm, I settled hard on my first girlfriend-an actually obese landwhale-to get experience. Because inexperience is seen as a red flag in males. She told stories about the kinds of flirty comments she got from people as she worked her cashier job. She’d get obvious romantic and/or sexual interest from someone at least once every four days. That’s several times more than what I’ve received in my entire fucking life. That’s why I disbelieve all the bloopers balking about “Well um average-or-…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 03:13 AM
1

I actually hard-settled for my first girlfriend specifically to avoid this social blemish by getting experience and being able to claim I’ve dated before.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 08:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter