TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MemerovDankh Archive

View 0 posts and 12 comments by MemerovDankh on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I was being sarcastic. Also I disagree, gender roles stemmed more from biology and labor than religion. Religion just helped cement them in society. Back when we lived in hunter-gatherer societies, they tended to be fairly egalitarian because men did most of the hunting while women did most of the gathering. They had gender roles but because the labor of gathering food was evenly divided, the societies tended to be mostly egalitarian as well. When we shifted to agricultural societies most of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 07:10 PM
1

Yeah our ancestors should have just all converted to Islam instead /s
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 06:52 PM
5

As someone on the Eastside (living in a family of 4 with a little over 200k annual combined salary funny enough), I don't think this area is especially good as far as diversity and culture goes. You get more Asians and Indians but fewer Blacks and Latinos compared to the South, so that's a mixed bag. And the "Seattle freeze" concept has been very true in my experience. I cant speak for Tennessee but I grew up in Georgia and while there were fewer of us Indians there, I still felt that there was …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 04:17 AM
0

Yeah, I'm not repeating everything I've just said yet another time if you're this stuck on something I've already explained to you is completely wrong. Try actually researching some of what you're talking about before trying to debate over it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 07:34 PM
0

Yes, which all the policies already do to a large degree, except their fertility is still well below 2.1 They could certainly ramp up their policies further but to reach replacement would be extremely expensive and probably unsustainable with the rest of their current welfare state.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 05:10 PM
0

The fact that it's already plenty accessible in these countries. Something doesn't have to be free for everyone who was going to take advantage of it to take advantage. For example the Quebec model (7 dollars a day for childcare) stacks up to roughly 150 dollars a month for childcare (7 × 5 days a week × 4 weeks a month + Ill give you 10 for remaining days). Do you seriously think that Quebecois women will on average have 0.5 children more than they do now if you gave them the equivalent of an e…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 05:33 AM
0

It would rise, just not by much and not remotely close to enough to reach replacement. there are countries that literally pay people to have kids Yes, and those countries (such as Hungary and Poland) still don't have above replacement fertility. I'm sure if you paid people absolutely massive amounts of money you could do it, but at a certain point it becomes too expensive to actually implement. Here's an article discussing that exact idea: https://ifstudies.org/blog/pro-natal-policies-work-but-t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 01:12 AM
0

You're drastically overestimating how much bigger the rate will be if you think it'll increase by 0.5. Childcare is already accessible in these areas, it doesn't need to also be completely free for people who weren't going to have kids already to change their minds on that topic. Also extensive paid maternity and paternity leaves exist in the Nordic countries. There are even countries that pay people massive amounts of money to have children, such as Hungary. None of these countries are at repla…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 08:23 PM
1

Did you completely miss the bit on Quebec and the Nordics? We've had heavily subsidized childcare in those countries and they still have fertility that's about comparable to the US, a country that doesn't have much in the way of childcare subsidy at all. If you think making that childcare completely free instead of just heavily subsidized is going to increase their fertility by something like 0.5 (up to replacement), then I really don't know what to tell you. Try actually researching the things …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 07:59 PM
0

That's a copout of a response. That's like the equivalent of me saying climate change isn't an issue because people project wrong things all the time. We have very real data of trends over time that fertility is dropping, just like we have trends of CO2 rising and temperature increasing. It's already happened and will continue to happen. The exact year might be off, but it won't be by a massive margin either. Also, saying free childcare is a better way to deal with it is a copout as well when we…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 07:54 PM
1

The world will be below replacement ratio well before that. The global fertility rate in 2019 was 2.4 and that was pre-pandemic. India recently dropped below replacement, joining China, and those two countries make up like a third of the population just by themselves. Lots of projections put us below replacement globally (or only barely above it) by 2050. Also, you're drastically underestimating how had this problem is to solve. Quebec has a heavily subsidized childcare system for example where …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 07:36 PM
0

Not forever. The countries that immigrants tend to come from develop over time and see lower fertility as well (Mexico and India are right around replacement now for example, and India actually dropped below it). Also as those countries develop and become better places to live, people are less likely to want to leave them for more developed countries. At a certain point you have to automate, raise fertility, or figure out how to extend the number of years that people can work in their lifespan. …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 06:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter