TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MenBearsPigs Archive

View 0 posts and 20 comments by MenBearsPigs on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I'd say this behavior is uncommon or at least viewed poorly in specific social circles. Though it without a doubt does happen. Especially when drinks get involved. Usually it's just a few off hand comments, where you can feel the venom, and everyone just kind of laughs it off or pretends they didn't hear it lol. Men do this too btw. I don't think it's exclusively one way. Though if a man does it he's going to be viewed as a bully/abusive much faster, so it's probably slightly less common.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 10:40 PM
2

A lot of guys way over estimate how much testosterone has dropped. I see it used so often to try and justify using steroids "bro I have to cause microplastics and soy!" If you eat well, exercise hard, and get enough rest, you will have good testosterone barring a genetic issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 03:48 PM
2

I find Neurodivergent and Neurotypical to also be kind of dumb terms. I think it seriously throws a lot of people under the bus who actually are dealing with things mentally. I'd say the majority of people have varying degrees of anxiety, depression, anger, and executive function shortcomings. Feels like half the population diagnosed themselves with ADHD and calls everyone else Neurotypical. It's ridiculous. I don't believe in "Neurotypical" when it starts to be used to differentiate people with…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 03:09 PM
10

Because they're grifters who make money off of those bitter young guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 05:04 PM
21

This is why young guys often swing way too far "red pill" into misogynistic territory when they first start reading and understanding these things. Young guys just didn't understand any of these dynamics were at play, but women become much more socially aware of all these things at much younger ages. Then the guys feel like they were "lied too" and get bitter.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 03:16 PM
6

Naa I completely agree with your take. Just look at romance/smut novels. They're extremely popular still with women, and men have zero interest. Our brains work differently. Text based AI could potentially be like that perfect complicated billionaire bad boy boyfriend etc etc, except talking directly to them instead of a proxy character.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 12:39 PM
1

This was always my biggest hang up. I'd just want to know if they'd been with someone I'd see regularly or run into, that we both mutually know. And I'd definitely prefer the answer to that be no.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 01:24 PM
2

Just started seeing that term pop up a year ago or so. Now every subreddit that has to do with relationships or sex uses it regularly. It's pretty sad. These people clearly want monogamous relationships but convince themselves they don't, and that it's their fear of commitment preventing it (it's not.)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/23 12:39 PM
2

This stuff makes me genuinely a bit afraid of having a daughter. If I'm a loving, involved father, with a solid relationship with my daughter, what are the odds she still turns out like this?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/20 04:49 PM
1

Any good manager takes pride in protecting and defending their good employees. My manager knows who I am and would literally never side with a customer short of me saying something crazy.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/19 08:43 PM
3

He never said preferred or attracted to. He said he wouldn't consider being with someone who didn't have huge tits. That's his choice, but it's incredibly shallow. Stop being so fucking sensitive. It's not the end of the world to be a shallow person.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 12:47 PM
7

His argument is fucking stupid. Breast surgery isn't something that the majority of women would ever consider doing. And there are surgeries you can get to increase penis and height. It's a weak cop out argument. It's the exact same kind of shallowness. Just because breast surgery exists doesn't discredit that fact. What kind of logic is that?
/r/MensRights02/03/19 06:31 AM
4

Yes I read your comment. Do you need me to go through the sentence and break it down for you to help you understand?
/r/MensRights02/03/19 06:28 AM
2

It's shallow. You're a shallow person. Man up, accept it, and move on.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 06:27 AM
5

Your reasoning is asinine. Height then. You're the same as a woman who wouldn't ever date anyone under 6 foot. That's within their rights, but they're also objectively shallow people.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 06:25 AM
5

Did you not understand my meaning? I thought I was pretty clear there.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 06:22 AM
–

It's shallow man. You're saying you would refuse to marry someone who was perfect in every way but had small breasts. That isn't just a preference, that's the definition of shallow. If you said that's your preference and that's the type of women you'd be more inclined towards, that would be a more normal statement. What you've said is just kind of sad.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 05:43 AM
–

I don't think he cares a ton. He's just calling the guy out for being shallow, which he is. The guy has every right to be that shallow, but I don't see what the big deal is and calling it like it is. Being that shallow is a major negative personality trait. I feel kind of bad for someone if they are so shallow that they'd turn down their perfect woman exclusively because of their breast size. Having preferences is fine. But saying it is non-negotiable is shallow as fuck.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 05:40 AM
-2

Jesus you're sensitive.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 05:35 AM
–

It's a valid comparison. At least stick to your guns if you're going all in on this.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 05:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter