TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MenDeserveRights Archive

View 108 posts and 1,249 comments by MenDeserveRights on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
938

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights13/11/18 08:21 AM
324

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights21/03/18 08:20 PM
243

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:19 AM
203

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights17/03/18 06:50 AM
186

MenDeserveRights/r/MensRights21/06/18 07:18 AM
146

FeminismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights15/12/17 06:26 AM
143

FeminismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights12/01/18 07:41 AM
109

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights13/04/18 05:38 AM
90

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights28/02/18 03:22 AM
79

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights21/03/18 08:49 PM
77

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights04/11/18 09:52 PM
70

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights26/04/18 06:35 AM
67

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights05/05/18 09:32 AM
62

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights14/11/18 07:03 PM
62

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights03/04/18 06:00 AM
61

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights03/05/17 10:05 PM
60

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights04/05/18 05:34 PM
57

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights22/10/18 05:59 AM
54

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights29/10/18 06:03 AM
53

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights17/04/18 05:22 AM
52

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights09/12/17 11:15 PM
52

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights15/01/18 04:52 PM
48

MenDeserveRights/r/MensRights28/03/17 10:18 PM
47

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights06/01/18 08:10 PM
43

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights13/01/18 03:36 AM
43

Social IssuesMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights13/02/17 02:21 AM
42

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights13/01/18 08:38 PM
42

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights06/03/18 10:56 PM
40

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights09/11/18 07:53 PM
38

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights08/01/18 12:16 AM
37

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights17/03/18 08:12 AM
34

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights17/04/18 04:44 AM
33

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights23/02/18 07:12 AM
33

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights15/03/18 11:46 PM
32

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights24/08/18 02:07 AM
32

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights15/01/18 09:06 PM
31

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights14/03/17 11:43 PM
30

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights14/11/18 06:49 PM
30

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights14/01/18 12:59 AM
30

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights26/03/18 10:40 PM
30

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights07/06/18 06:23 PM
29

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights16/04/17 03:55 AM
27

FeminismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights09/03/17 04:23 AM
26

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights14/04/18 04:25 AM
25

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights10/11/18 10:25 AM
24

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights16/07/18 04:09 PM
24

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights04/04/18 05:22 PM
23

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights09/01/18 08:01 AM
23

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights15/03/18 09:45 PM
23

MenDeserveRights/r/MensRights02/04/17 09:01 AM
23

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights06/03/18 02:37 AM
23

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights22/03/18 10:55 PM
22

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:04 PM
22

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights26/04/18 07:01 AM
22

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights14/03/18 05:35 AM
22

Social IssuesMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights17/03/18 09:26 PM
21

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights14/11/18 08:08 PM
21

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights12/06/18 07:37 PM
20

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights27/06/18 08:23 AM
20

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights18/03/18 08:23 PM
20

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights13/04/17 07:28 PM
19

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights12/09/18 05:53 PM
18

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights07/04/18 07:13 PM
18

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights17/03/18 06:22 AM
18

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights16/09/18 09:13 AM
18

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights09/11/18 10:48 PM
17

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights11/03/18 07:31 AM
16

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights17/03/18 09:23 PM
15

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights15/04/18 05:34 AM
13

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights10/01/18 01:11 AM
13

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights09/01/18 02:09 AM
13

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights13/04/18 08:22 PM
12

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights10/01/18 06:28 PM
12

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights25/03/18 05:28 PM
12

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights30/03/18 02:08 AM
11

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights05/04/17 01:35 AM
11

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights12/01/18 06:47 AM
11

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights07/11/18 03:23 AM
10

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights27/03/18 03:39 AM
10

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights28/04/18 03:18 AM
10

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights11/01/18 12:08 AM
9

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights22/10/18 08:38 PM
9

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights14/11/18 08:59 PM
9

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights08/11/18 11:10 PM
9

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights12/01/18 02:03 AM
9

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights11/01/18 08:11 AM
8

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights12/05/18 07:41 AM
7

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights14/11/18 11:21 PM
7

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights12/01/18 10:42 PM
7

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights22/09/18 07:09 AM
7

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights09/04/18 06:48 AM
7

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights11/01/18 12:00 AM
6

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:07 PM
5

QuestionsMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights06/04/17 03:58 AM
5

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights31/12/17 06:44 AM
5

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights23/10/18 01:39 AM
3

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights10/11/18 08:55 AM
3

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights10/11/18 12:33 AM
3

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights04/06/18 02:13 AM
2

GeneralMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights24/07/18 07:51 AM
2

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights11/09/18 01:12 AM
1

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights05/03/18 01:32 AM
1

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights22/10/18 08:19 PM
1

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights22/10/18 02:13 AM
1

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights11/04/18 03:16 AM
1

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights17/06/18 05:22 AM
1

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights08/11/18 06:56 AM
0

IntactivismMenDeserveRights/r/MensRights06/04/18 10:02 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,249 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

But that alone won't make them feel guilty/bad about it.
/r/MensRights31/10/18 06:11 AM
1

No, it isn't.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 05:37 AM
3

Genital mutilation is a far more accurate descriptor than "circumcision".
/r/MensRights29/10/18 09:20 PM
8

Anyone who thinks "circumcision" is a good thing is an idiot.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 09:20 PM
7

Me, too.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 09:19 PM
7

All of these mutilator moms have their entire genitalia, yet they deprive their sons of the same thing. Fuck them.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 09:19 PM
1

Parents like this are the worst.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 09:18 PM
8

Genital mutilators deserve far worse than internet judgement...
/r/MensRights29/10/18 09:18 PM
3

Agreed.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 09:17 PM
6

The title is grammatically correct.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 09:17 PM
1

They're still guilty, even if they weren't the ones who set the whole thing in motion. Even if you're not the one causing the horrible acts, going along with them is still bad. And I would not stay friends with any woman who circumcised her son unless she was Jewish or Muslim.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 11:03 PM
1

You're a great mother, thank you for protecting your son. I'm mutilated, but my sons will be left whole if I ever have any.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 11:02 PM
1

No, since it does fuck all for the boys they've already harmed. I'm not a forgiving person, nor do I expect forgiveness from others.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 10:04 PM
1

My rebuttal is that this should be a movement of victims sharing their anger with the world, not some sort of support group for genital mutilators who happen to say "oooh I feel bad now"
/r/MensRights25/10/18 08:40 AM
1

The majority of our supporter base is male genital mutilation victims, not narcissistic "regret moms".
/r/MensRights25/10/18 05:53 AM
0

I want them to suffer. They caused me to suffer, so it's fair for them to suffer, too. If my mother was willing to have her genitals sliced up with no anesthetic, that might make it up for me, because then we'd be even.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 03:29 AM
12

Because it's the only way to get our message across in a world that is completely uncaring and hostile. People respond to humor better than they respond to soapboxing. And it's a bitter joke, not a goofy one.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 12:56 AM
12

How can we be sure that Harry Potter is fiction? Because the mother in it actually loves her son!
/r/MensRights25/10/18 12:17 AM
1

As long as women circumcise their sons, I will try to take birth control access away from them.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 12:07 AM
9

It's time to stop centering "regret mother" narratives, and start centering the narratives of actual MGM victims. These "regret mothers" have done something horrific, and they don't deserve to be treated as courageous or heroic just because they said "oh I'm sorry now". No. They made their bed, now they can lie in it.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 12:06 AM
0

There's nothing she can ever do to make it up to him. I hope every single day of her life from now until the day she dies, she feels nothing but utter self-hatred and neverending emotional agony.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 12:04 AM
1

They told Martin Luther King the same thing.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 05:07 PM
1

We have different goals, then. My goal is to punish circumcisers regardless of how they feel now in order to feel better about what happened to me. Circumcision bans are secondary to me, but I still strongly support them.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 07:04 AM
1

What happened to my penis wasn't fair, it's time for "regret moms" to reap what they've sown.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 07:03 AM
1

You're more forgiving than I am. I am cruel, but fair.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 12:59 AM
1

But nothing she changes in the future will ever make her a good person.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 12:08 AM
1

That won't do anything for her son, so it won't make up for what she did. She needs to shut her mouth and never speak about circumcision again.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 11:13 PM
1

I'm not "black propaganda", I've been posting here for almost 2 years. And "Wikipedia Britanica"? You're not really that bright, either.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 11:12 PM
1

I'm a victim of this practice, and I support punishing people in arrears.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 11:11 PM
1

Black propaganda? This has nothing to do with race, and I'm actually White.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 09:38 PM
1

The pro-life movement has tried your method of "include regretful women", and has gotten absolutely no where. Abortion is still legal in all 50 states. Why the #*%$ should we try tactics that others have already failed using?
/r/MensRights23/10/18 09:37 PM
1

But even if they regret it, they don't suffer the way their sons do, so they need to be made to suffer.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 09:36 PM
1

lol :)
/r/MensRights23/10/18 09:36 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 09:36 PM
1

So she doesn't need "kudos", she needs to shut her mouth and spend the rest of her life feeling nothing but guilt, shame, and self-loathing.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 09:36 PM
1

Your idea that perpetrators should be let off the hook if they meant well is about as insensitive to victims as it gets.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 09:35 PM
1

I've been observing an argument between a MGM victim and a narcissistic "regret mother".
/r/MensRights23/10/18 09:34 PM
2

It reduces sensitivity and is a traumatic experience for the baby, but the biggest reason it's a problem is because it denies the owner of the penis any input into whether or not he'd like half of it amputated.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 09:33 PM
1

:)
/r/MensRights23/10/18 07:09 AM
3

I wasn't describing my own mother. I've never discussed this topic with her, and don't plan to.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 07:09 AM
1

If you agree with me that circumcising infants is wrong, then why do you stick up for these "regret mothers"? (also, I assume that you're female, please correct me if I'm wrong)
/r/MensRights23/10/18 07:08 AM
1

I can't provide it since I'm not allowed to link to facebook
/r/MensRights23/10/18 06:39 AM
1

I'm American. These vulgar insults only make you seem immature.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 06:38 AM
1

We simply have different theories of justice, you and I.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 06:38 AM
1

If you think I'm the only one affected by this, you haven't seen r/foreskin_restoration
/r/MensRights23/10/18 06:36 AM
1

Insurance pays for it in most states.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 06:36 AM
1

A narcissistic idiot who circumcised her son and then tries to get circumcision victims to feel sorry for her.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 06:35 AM
3

It still does fuck-all for her first victim, I mean son.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 06:35 AM
2

Thanks!
/r/MensRights23/10/18 06:34 AM
1

You speak for yourself, bub.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 06:34 AM
1

Treating them as brave or seeing them as victims as well is in effect letting them get away with it.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 06:34 AM
1

But that still doesn't change what they did. Their sons will never be whole again, why the fuck should they be able to get away with it scot-free?
/r/MensRights23/10/18 01:43 AM
1

No, mothers who circumcised their sons are the ones to blame. And as far as I'm concerned, there's no difference between a "regret mother" and an unrepentant circumciser. The effect on their son is the same. If I was a leader of intactivism, I'd tell all the "regret mothers" to pack their bags and take a walk.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 01:42 AM
1

They're morally guilty because their actions had a negative impact on their sons. I don't give a fuck about "intentions" or "mens rea"
/r/MensRights23/10/18 01:36 AM
5

Why archive this? It's on a friendly site, so there's no harm in it getting clicks...
/r/MensRights23/10/18 01:35 AM
1

I DON'T CARE IF THEY DID IT MALICIOUSLY OR NOT, THE EFFECT ON THEIR SON IS THE SAME. Intentions are irrelevant to me, effects are what matters.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 01:35 AM
1

thanks
/r/MensRights23/10/18 01:34 AM
1

Why do you say that?
/r/MensRights23/10/18 01:34 AM
1

Self-defense is the only time motive matters. Killing someone who wasn't trying to kill/maim you is equally bad if it was an preplanned murder, crime of passion, or accident. And "regret moms" aren't innocent. THEY STILL MUTILATED THEIR SON...
/r/MensRights22/10/18 11:49 PM
1

They're morally guilty in my opinion, even if they meant no harm and are not legally culpable for anything.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 11:48 PM
1

Who cares if they were malicious? It's completely irrelevant. It doesn't change the damage done. It's high time our legal system stop looking at motivations and circumstance, and start to only look at the impact and the damage done.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 11:30 PM
2

Just because "regret moms" aren't the only enemy doesn't mean they're the wrong enemy. We can focus on more than one type of enemy.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 11:29 PM
1

Even if they weren't being negligent and it was just a tragic accident, they still face some kind of punishment. I'm not saying that "regret moms" belong in Guantanamo, but they should face some sort of punishment.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 11:29 PM
1

That doesn't make it right. If every parent who had to do it was fined say $20,000 per kid they inflicted it on, the circumcision rate would drop to virtually 0% overnight.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 11:03 PM
2

At least I'm not defending "regret moms"
/r/MensRights22/10/18 11:03 PM
1

Then why do people who accidentally kill pedestrians with their car while completely sober still have to face legal consequences?
/r/MensRights22/10/18 11:02 PM
1

Doctors need parental consent to do it.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 10:31 PM
3

She deserves it for what she did. "Regret parents" need to sit down, shut up, and stay out of the intactivist movement. We neither need nor want them.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 10:31 PM
1

read the thread linked
/r/MensRights22/10/18 10:30 PM
-1

Their sons didn't deserve the mutilation either. I say, an eye for an eye.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 10:30 PM
1

Yes, they do. It doesn't matter why they did it, it matters that they did it. Just like people who accidentally run over children in their car still get punished for it, even if they didn't mean to.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 10:30 PM
1

If we make an example of some mutilating parents, it might encourage expecting parents to think twice. And "regret moms" deserve to feel crushing depression and guilt and self-hatred and shame until the day that they die. And if it were up to me, all "regret parents" would be permabanned from the intactivist movement. They don't belong.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 08:48 PM
-1

Closer to 3/4 of adult American males. All of those mothers deserve the hatred, though.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 08:14 PM
-1

They still chose to do it, and don't deserve to be let off the hook. Their sons will have to live the rest of their lives with mutilated genitals and an almost total lack of sexual pleasure, so it's more than fair for them to have to live the rest of their lives with nothing but guilt and neverending emotional pain, and no relationship with their sons. You reap what you sow.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 08:07 PM
3

I'm willing to forgive most things. Genital mutilation isn't one of them.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 08:04 PM
1

They don't deserve good lives after what they've done. Should a former slave/plantation owner have been let off the hook if they claimed to regret what they did? One benefit is that they will feel the pain they've caused.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 08:03 PM
0

They need to feel the pain they've caused. Why are you so eager to let them off the hook?
/r/MensRights22/10/18 06:12 PM
4

Obviously I don't think regret moms are actually victims, rather I sill see them as perpetrators, and don't think they should be forgiven ever.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 05:27 PM
1

There is nothing a regret parent could ever do to pay off their debt.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 05:25 PM
4

She said she feels "guilty" and "shameful" and "self hating". Good, I hope those feelings only get stronger and that she carries them with her to the grave.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 05:25 PM
1

What the hell have they done to deserve forgiveness?
/r/MensRights22/10/18 05:24 PM
-1

What's important is making "regret moms" truly feel the pain they've caused. You can't make up for vivisecting your child with meaningless online platitudes.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 05:24 PM
0

The problem is that it just lets the parents off the hook with no real consequences, since the only person who bears the consequences of the parents bad decision is the son. Our movement would be stronger without "regret parents" and their crocodile tears.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 09:05 AM
1

If your whole existence is locked up in your foreskin, I feel sorry for you. It isn't, but that doesn't mean it's irrelevant to me. If you are unable to forgive the transgressions of others, sooner or later you'll be an island. I can forgive transgressions, but not huge ones like this. Would you forgive your parents if they blinded you at birth? Enjoy your solitude. Like every tree stands on it's own Reaching for the sky, I stand alone I share my world with no one else All by myself, I stand alo…
/r/MensRights22/10/18 08:28 AM
1

She doesn't deserve compassion, either. She did something beyond evil, and should never be forgiven. I've never done anything remotely as bad. I'd forgive someone for something like eating my leftovers, or forgetting my birthday, or other such frivolities. Forgiveness doesn't heal the forgiver, that's hippie BS If you wronged me in a major way, I will never forget, nor forgive you. What possible benefit could a MGM victim forgiving his regret mother have? It would bring his foreskin back, and it…
/r/MensRights22/10/18 06:40 AM
11

Women who like circumcised penises need to suffer the same social stigma that a man would if he said "I like infibulated women"
/r/MensRights22/10/18 06:32 AM
0

She needs her son to forgive her. I hope he never does. That's like saying, "Bill Cosby raped women, but kudos to him for not doing it again" She's a genital mutilator, regardless of if she protecting her second son, because that still does fuck-all for her first son. Regret moms need to GTFO out of intactivism. They fucked up, if they were truly sorry they would shut up and let the actual victims of this procedure run the movement.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 06:27 AM
1

Thanks: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9qazmb/its_barbaric_to_criticize_me_for_mutilating_my/
/r/MensRights22/10/18 06:00 AM
2

Fuck the CDC. Hypocritical, misandrist bastards.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 05:57 AM
1

Can I repost it without the quotation marks?
/r/MensRights22/10/18 05:56 AM
0

So why the $%*( should she be forgiven? It's not like regretting it undoes what she did. She'll never be able to make it right with son #1, no matter what she does "regret parents" are as useful to the intactivist movement as "regret slaveowners" would be to the abolitionist movement.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 05:46 AM
1

Will do
/r/MensRights22/10/18 05:45 AM
9

Sexual preferences are fine until they start violating human rights. What if I had a fetish for infibulated women? (because that's what liking circumcised penises really is...a genital mutilation fetish)
/r/MensRights22/10/18 05:45 AM
0

I'd honestly rather date Lorena Bobbitt than a feminist. At least she's honest about hating men and our penises, and doesn't try to hide it behind some sort of "women are oppressed" veneer.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 02:14 AM
3

I agree.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 02:12 AM
1

I completely agree.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 02:12 AM
1

Circumcision is the removal of almost all the pleasurable regions of the penis, should it really get points because it leaves behind a genital remnant you can pee out of?
/r/MensRights22/10/18 01:52 AM
4

You're right. Male circumcision is worse because it removes more nerve endings.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 01:50 AM
3

Which has fewer nerve endings than the foreskin.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 01:50 AM
3

The mother and doctor should both be thrown in jail for the rest of their lives.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 08:24 AM
2

Porn is not an accurate depiction of sex...it's heavily staged and edited. Male circumcision is as detrimental to male pleasure as female circumcision is to female pleasure.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 06:56 AM
2

Your dick doesn't work as well as it would have if half of the skin hadn't been amputated.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 08:50 AM
2

I'd cut your cousin out of your life, if I were you. If any friend/relative of mine circumcised their son, they would be instantly removed from my social circle.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 06:14 PM
7

I don't want money. I want a functional penis. Since I have been circumcised, I will never have a functional penis. No amount of money will ever make right what was done.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 06:41 AM
3

I don't feel remotely bad for her being genitally mutilated because she did this to her son and bragged about it. And also because her description of her son's penis is borderline pedophilia.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 09:14 PM
4

Anywone who still views her as a "human rights activist" after reading that needs to be sent to a mental hospital.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 09:13 PM
4

Well, either way, this woman is unfit to be a mother and in a sane world, she would be imprisoned for life and have her child put in foster care.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 11:42 PM
3

I've come across this disgusting attitude before
/r/MensRights21/09/18 10:49 PM
7

Go back to your cave, troll.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 10:48 PM
5

I at least hope that her childbirth was excruciating agony. She deserves it.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 10:47 PM
1

Who TF says "daddy" in a non-ironic way anymore?
/r/MensRights21/09/18 10:47 PM
6

u/TheMythof_Feminism is either an extreme libertarian or a troll who believes that making it illegal to mutilate children's genitals is akin to "communism" and "subjugation of parents as vassals of the state"
/r/MensRights21/09/18 10:46 PM
3

I'm another circumcision victim who has become a MGTOW as a result. Ask your mom "how does being upset that the best part of my penis is gone make me a woman-hater?" There's no logical answer to that question
/r/MensRights21/09/18 07:26 AM
12

Feminists don't care about children. Not when they're screwing them over in custody arrangements, not when they are mutilating their genitals, not when they are murdering them in the womb.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 07:23 AM
7

Is it wrong to ban female circumcision, as well?
/r/MensRights20/09/18 01:14 AM
4

Less than 5% of circumcisions in America are connected to Jews.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 12:54 AM
7

Society cares more about piercing the ears of young girls than about mutilating the genitals of young boys.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 09:39 PM
4

If you're an American Gentile, you're not circumcised because of "the Jews", you're circumcised because of bad medicine.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 09:38 PM
4

Please don't bring anti-semitic conspiracy theories into this. There are a lot of Jews who are Intactivists.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:33 PM
7

Basic restrictions on parents harming their children =/= totalitarianism
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:51 PM
6

It's the same kind of logic abusive partners and spouses use.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:15 PM
7

You seem to be some kind of anarchist who things there should be absolutely no laws preventing anyone from doing whatever they want.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:14 PM
3

facepalm
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:13 PM
13

The only troll here is you.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 09:35 AM
1

The difference is that woman are biologically supposed to get pregnant, but men aren't biologically supposed to get castrated.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 09:10 AM
5

So this time he lost the entire penis instead of just losing virtually the entire penile sensitivity, like a normal "circumcision". "Circumcision" removes all the good parts of the penis, and leaves a man with a penis remnant that can hardly feel a thing. So while yes, this is horrifying, standard American/Canadian/Jewish "circumcisions" are just slightly less horrifying.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 07:38 AM
7

"Boy, 6, Loses Penis To Bad Circumcision" There's no such thing as a good circumcision.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 07:37 AM
14

If feminism was really about gender equality, they'd care about this. But instead they're more worried about "manspreading".
/r/MensRights14/09/18 07:36 AM
1

It was r/darkjokes that this happened on
/r/MensRights13/09/18 06:37 AM
4

He's caused far more harm to Reddit than Russian trolls ever could.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 06:37 AM
30

I remember N8theGr8 from when he tried to censor offensive jokes on a subreddit dedicated to offensive jokes. He's a sad, strange little man.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 05:52 PM
1

So it means he probably doesn't have a strong opinion one way or another, so this is a good chance to educate him and save his son.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 02:11 AM
2

Exactly. I'll never have great sex, or even good sex, so I'll just choose to spend my time doing things I can enjoy fully.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 09:04 PM
1

Everytime this has come up with a friend, they have known whether or not they were circumcised. It could be a regional thing, though.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 09:03 PM
2

I know someone who had to have their gallbladder removed, but that doesn't mean we should remove gallbladders from healthy children.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:43 AM
1

Circumcised sex is like watching a grainy old black and white film Intact sex is like watching a 4K color TV with surround sound
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:42 AM
1

There are millions a year - every time a feminist circumcises her son, that's a feminist terrorist act.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:08 AM
2

I know this might sound crazy, but I don't really want to have sex at all, since I know I'll never have the pleasure of natural and normal sexual intercourse. It's not that I'm asexual or have a low sex drive, it's just that because of the harm done to me, I know that sex will never really be very good, so I just think it's more productive to spend time on things that I can do fully.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:06 AM
1

If Kavanaugh had mentioned circumcision, he would have probably lost votes from all Republican senators with mutilated sons. I don't think any Democrats are planning to vote for him, anyway.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:05 AM
2

He's also a circumcised man with intact sons. I respect him deeply for that.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:03 AM
1

Anyone with a doctorate who asks anyone other than their students or patients to call them "Doctor" is a pretentious wanker.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:01 AM
3

I learned when I was 9, most teenagers know what circumcision is and if they are, since it's easy to google.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 07:57 AM
3

Virtually no one will take teenagers saying they are angry at their parents seriously, since our society treats complaints about parenting by teenagers as frivolous and something they will grow out of. Posting stuff on social media about angry teenagers will make us (intactivists) look like a childish movement, and will probably get us linked to mostly-teenage and young adult online groups like Kekistanis or the alt-right in the public consciousness. This is the absolute opposite of how we want …
/r/MensRights09/09/18 07:57 AM
1

Why would you be proud of only having half of your penis, and the least sensitive half at that?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 07:47 AM
7

Your dick still works in the sense that you can urinate and ejaculate. Your dick doesn't work in the sense that you can't feel much pleasure.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 04:22 AM
2

Their soul's been sold for the love of strange medicine...
/r/MensRights25/08/18 04:21 AM
2

Watch a circumcision video with the sound on, and then ask yourself if you really want to put your innocent, defenseless son through that.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 05:19 PM
1

More proof of his idiocy: he's been banned from local supermarkets for complaining about "uppity Negroes" before.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 05:18 PM
9

I'm very tempted to register on that forum to rebuff his drivel, but I already spend enough time online, and the posters there have already done a good job of it. This just shows how some circumcised men are desperate to disregard the truth.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 02:08 AM
3

That's a year before I was born. If only my parents gave a shit about men and boys...
/r/MensRights24/08/18 02:06 AM
6

Leave those videos up. Let's hope more people see them, so that they understand how horrific male genital mutilation truly is.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 02:05 AM
4

They were already attacked in a violent way when they were infants. Compared to that, a few harsh words are nothing.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 01:19 AM
13

I guarantee you that having your genitals mutilated is much more unpleasant than watching someone else have their genitals mutilated.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 05:34 PM
22

Your little brother was probably forcefully retracted as an infant or toddler, which led to the problems. Any woman who would reject a man for not being genitally mutilated isn't a woman worth having a relationship with anyway. And no one cares if your brother's mutilation was unpleasant for your mother, since I guarantee you it was 1,000,000 times more unpleasant for him than it ever could be for her.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 05:31 AM
1

Maiming and disfiguring children is not a right.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 06:44 PM
4

This is why I don't date/sleep with women, despite being straight.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 06:44 PM
2

It just boggles my mind that anyone could be happy with having half of a penis.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 06:44 PM
5

But why? All the good parts of your dick are missing for no real reason
/r/MensRights24/07/18 06:43 PM
1

Thanks for letting me know
/r/MensRights24/07/18 06:42 PM
1

I'm advocating preventing parents from doing something they never should have been allowed to do in the first place.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 07:51 AM
1

I don't love communism, and genital mutilation is a far greater evil than laws restricting the practice.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 07:00 AM
1

facepalm x2
/r/MensRights24/07/18 06:07 AM
1

There is no context in which cutting healthy, functional parts of an infant off is acceptable.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 06:07 AM
22

Who would actually be glad that the good parts of their dick are missing?
/r/MensRights24/07/18 05:44 AM
1

facepalm
/r/MensRights24/07/18 05:43 AM
1

a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 05:42 AM
2

Look up what communism is.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 12:42 AM
1

So then what makes shooting your neighbors wrong, if there is no absolute morality?
/r/MensRights24/07/18 12:42 AM
12

Honestly, the more I think about it, the more it seems to me that circumcision and penectomy are essentially the same phenomenon, just various degrees of severity. Penectomy removes the entire penis, but circumcision removes all the good parts of the penis. Maybe we would make more headway (no pun intended) if we started calling circumcision "partial penectomy", which is really what it is.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 12:02 AM
1

This has nothing to do with communism, and you're just mentioning it to be inflammatory and derail the debate.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 12:00 AM
1

A moral wrong must never be a legal right.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 11:59 PM
1

u/TheMythof_Feminism is a troll.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 11:58 PM
3

Why? Do you think male sexual pleasure is less important than female sexual pleasure?
/r/MensRights22/07/18 05:44 PM
4

Sometimes, the right thing to do is not the easy thing to do. Now is one of those times.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 05:43 PM
2

You can regain a mostly natural appearance and some function, but you can never get back all that was stolen from you.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 05:22 AM
2

Her name is blank just like her moral compass.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 05:21 AM
31

If I had a wife (I'm currently 20 and single) who wanted to mutilate/circumcise our son, I would do everything it took to protect him, even if I had to steal him and hide.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 05:18 AM
9

Good for you.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 05:17 AM
2

There is no language bad enough for women who are pro-"circumcision".
/r/MensRights20/07/18 07:05 AM
19

You know the world is fucked up when a pinprick of a girl's ear draws more outrage than the amputation of half a boy's penile skin.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 04:37 AM
1

They're both brutal, barbaric traditions.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 02:16 AM
1

But it's an equally important tradition for other groups. Or are only your group's traditions above reproach?
/r/MensRights18/07/18 02:15 AM
1

Do whatever you want to your own body, but don't carve your traditions into infants.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 02:15 AM
1

I don't actually want to have an abortion discussion, and with Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court, don't be surprised when abortion is illegal in half the country by 2019. The point I was trying to make is that the comparative treatment of circumcision and abortion by the media and society in general shows how little value men's rights are given by most people.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 07:40 AM
1

Correct. Until I've got my basic rights, I'm not going to spend any energy on someone else's much less basic rights. (Even if abortion is a right, which I don't think it is, it's certainly much less basic/primary as a right than the right to bodily integrity.)
/r/MensRights14/07/18 04:47 AM
1

Once again, I don't think abortion is a right, nor do I think it should be legal, but that's not really germane to this discussion. The point is that as long as men's rights are violated in such an egregious way on such a massive scale, I have very little sympathy for feminists whinging about how women are oppressed, when men have it far, far, worse in this country.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 04:41 AM
1

I don't see abortion as a right, but you're missing my point. As long as most of the men in my country don't have the most fundamental right to preserve their bodies, women complaining about "my body, my choice" rings hollow to me.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 05:01 PM
26

Good for them. I wish American hospitals would do the same.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 07:43 AM
0

As long as men don't even have the right to decide how much of their penis they want to keep, I don't feel sorry for women who can't kill their unborn child at will.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 07:43 AM
3

I'm conservative and voted for Trump, but I'm not alt-right or anything like that.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 07:07 AM
2

I read this as "Billy Joel's Critique of The Red Pill" lol
/r/MensRights10/07/18 11:32 PM
1

Interesting how (mostly circumcised) American men don't have a lower rate of HIV infection than (mostly intact) European men.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 07:24 AM
1

Circumcision rates are increasing in some African countries, but they are declining in Anglosphere countries.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 06:11 AM
4

The circumcision rate is decreasing amongst all Western groups, although some European countries are having an influx of Islamic migrants which is driving up the rates there. The US infant circumcision rate is about 60% now. It was about 85% 50 years ago.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 05:49 AM
1

The circumcision rate is decreasing amongst all Western groups, although some European countries are having an influx of Islamic migrants which is driving up the rates there. The US infant circumcision rate is about 60% now. It was about 85% 50 years ago.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 05:49 AM
1

It's a harsh reality, but that doesn't make it any less real.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 04:55 AM
1

The foreskin is half of the penile skin, and most medical professionals in Europe, Oceania, and Canada are anti-circumcision.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 04:54 AM
3

The foreskin is half of the penile skin, and most medical professionals in Europe, Oceania, and Canada are anti-circumcision.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 04:54 AM
15

If any woman tells me "I prefer cut men", I'll tell her to fuck off until she's willing to cut off her clitoris to please a man.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 05:50 PM
5

Pulling your teeth makes it easier to clean your mouth, what's your point? No matter what, you still have to engage in safe sex. So would you rather cut off half of your penis and wear a condom, or just wear a condom without cutting off half of your penis? Then how come (mostly intact) European men don't have higher rates of penile cancer than (mostly cut) American men?
/r/MensRights08/07/18 05:49 PM
1

Pulling your teeth makes it easier to clean your mouth, what's your point? No matter what, you still have to engage in safe sex. So would you rather cut off half of your penis and wear a condom, or just wear a condom without cutting off half of your penis? Then how come (mostly intact) European men don't have higher rates of penile cancer than (mostly cut) American men?
/r/MensRights08/07/18 05:49 PM
6

agreed
/r/MensRights08/07/18 07:34 AM
7

facepalm
/r/MensRights08/07/18 07:34 AM
5

Your genitals have been mutilated, even if you are not upset about it.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 07:30 AM
5

HEALTH: No national medical association recommends it, not even in America or Israel. AESTHETIC: Completely subjective, and thus, only a benefit when chosen by the man whose penis it is. HYGIENE: Washing your foreskin is no harder than washing your hands.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 07:07 AM
2

@mods u/maluminse is a circumfetishist troll. Please ban him.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 07:06 AM
4

My penis is broken beyond repair, but hopefully this movie will protect lots of boys in the future.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 07:05 AM
3

The best part of your penis is gone forever. And if you really didn't care, you wouldn't be arguing about it online.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 07:04 AM
6

I'm definitely projecting. I'm so unhappy with my own penis that it's very difficult/near impossible for me to see how any man who knows the harms of circumcision (as opposed to someone who doesn't know what he lost) could ever be happy with his penis. As for being resentment - my parents and doctors are the reason that my penis is permanently damaged, and as long as the physical damage remains, so will my anger at them. And since Foregen looks like it won't pan out, that means they are stuck wi…
/r/MensRights08/07/18 07:02 AM
8

That doesn't make it any less morally abhorrent.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 06:21 AM
5

You think that genitally mutilating infants is acceptable, which shows you have a flawed moral compass.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 06:16 AM
12

I'm not talking about you specifically, but circumcised men not wanting to admit that they were wronged is one of the biggest reasons circumcision continues to this day.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 06:13 AM
5

Please read this and consider giving your son the choice you never had
/r/MensRights08/07/18 06:06 AM
3

it's a decision a parent should make. It's not their penis, it shouldn't be their decision.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 06:06 AM
3

Virtually all medical professionals in Europe and Oceania are strongly against infant male genital cutting.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 06:03 AM
7

Abolishing slavery seemed radical in 1840. What's your point?
/r/MensRights08/07/18 06:02 AM
9

99% of intact adult men will never get a circumcision, and if the medical "benefits" of forced infant genital cutting were real, then (mostly circumcised) American men would have better genital health than (mostly intact) European men. They don't, so your premise is invalid.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 06:00 AM
11

Male genital mutilation (aka "circumcision") makes it impossible for the penis to function normally, although cut men can technically still ejaculate.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 05:59 AM
11

The person whose penis it is is the only one who should be making that decision.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 05:57 AM
13

Regret is the wrong word since it implies you feel badly about your own actions. I don't regret being circumcised. I resent it, and my mother and doctor for doing it to me. I loathe my penis and what was done to it.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 05:56 AM
12

I understand where you're coming from, but cut men being "happy with what they've got" is one of the biggest reasons this gruesome practice continues.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 05:54 AM
7

Every time I look at my mutilated penis, I feel angry, sad, and betrayed. The fact that my parents did something this horrible to me, when they should have protected me, is one of many reasons that the only person I trust is the man in the mirror.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 05:53 AM
11

You're missing almost all of your penile sensitivity.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 05:52 AM
8

To be honest, and I know this sounds crazy, but I would have rather mine had been botched and lost my penis. Why? At least then the doctor would be punished, and future victims of his may have been spared. My parents would have felt guilty for the rest of their lives, like they deserve. They may have protected my younger brother. And honestly, in terms of sexual pleasure, a circumcised penis is almost worthless. As far as I'm concerned, circumcision removes all of the parts of the penis that mak…
/r/MensRights08/07/18 05:51 AM
6

Thank you for protecting your nephew.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 05:48 AM
5

Because deep down, I think many women enjoy seeing men sexually diminished and maimed in the most intimate area.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 05:47 AM
4

You're a good father.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 05:47 AM
1

Who cares if they were pressured into doing it? They still did it. I feel a lot more sorry for the sons, the true victims, than I do for the mothers who did this to them. If my mother ever told me she felt bad about it, I'd tell her to drown in her tears for all that I care.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 01:27 AM
1

And a lot of mothers know it's bad but do it anyway
/r/MensRights02/07/18 05:50 PM
1

That doesn't mean they're off the hook. They are still mutilators, even if they meant no harm.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 08:07 AM
1

Mothers sign the majority of mutilation/circumcision consent forms in hospitals.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 10:07 PM
2

There's a difference between totalitarianism and laws that prevent gross human rights violations.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 07:33 PM
3

Advocating for personal rights over your own body doesn't make me a communist.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 08:37 AM
8

It has the tri-fecta necessary to make the procedure compliant with the guardians, with medical personnel and with government. None of those three actually have the right to make this decision. The only person who legitimately does is the man whose penis it is once he comes of age. you are a communist so you seek to implement communism to resolve it. No, this has nothing to do with communism. You believe totalitarianism/communism is the solution and I do not agree. You seem like some kind of ana…
/r/MensRights27/06/18 08:18 AM
7

Banning violent human rights violations is hardly totalitarian.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 05:13 AM
6

Children are people under custodial guardianship, and still have rights. They are not property with no rights.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 05:13 AM
7

u/TheMythof_Feminism is just an unfunny version of this guy.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 01:34 AM
7

Once again, preventing someone from mutilating another person's genitals is not "subjugation".
/r/MensRights27/06/18 01:33 AM
7

I highly doubt you have a 10 year old nephew, since your posting and maturity level leads me to believe your barely over 10 yourself.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 01:32 AM
7

Go away, troll
/r/MensRights27/06/18 01:32 AM
10

Genital mutilation is a far greater atrocity than limiting what parents can do.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 01:30 AM
6

"Ward", "Subjugated". Why are you talking like a feudal lord from medieval times?
/r/MensRights27/06/18 01:29 AM
8

"No, officer, you can't arrest me for arson, Jesus told me to burn these houses down and my religious freedom!"
/r/MensRights26/06/18 09:31 PM
11

It's not remotely a strawman. If parents have a right to mutilate a boy's genitals, they also have a right to mutilate a girl's genitals. This is literally the definition of gender equality.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 09:31 PM
8

I do not believe in subjugating others. Actually, you believe in letting parents subjugate their sons in the name of "religion" or strange medicine.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 09:22 PM
9

Even the freest nations have limits on what parents can and cannot do to their children.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 09:22 PM
14

Should shooting people in the street also be "liberty", then? Or should your rights to do as you please end when you wish to infringe on someone else's rights?
/r/MensRights26/06/18 09:21 PM
13

Preventing you from maiming your child for religious reasons is not an infringement on your rights.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 09:20 PM
10

So then does liberty also apply to the liberty to mutilate a girl's clitoris?
/r/MensRights26/06/18 09:20 PM
13

Cowards.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 09:19 PM
1

I know it's off-topic, but this video about philosophy is utterly hilarious (and also completely NSFW)
/r/MensRights21/06/18 05:36 PM
30

"The suffering of adults — and adult men at that — doesn’t pique popular sympathy the way that the mistreatment of children does."
/r/MensRights21/06/18 07:18 AM
11

Who cares about parental consent? He was circumcised without his consent, and that's all that matters.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 07:04 AM
3

Disgusting but predictable
/r/MensRights17/06/18 06:11 AM
1

Well, our fucked-up society doesn't consider chopping up a baby boy's penis to be violence, so this doesn't surprise me.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 05:29 PM
3

Read the article. Some news outlet calls all academics Mr/Mrs/Ms and only physicians Dr, but some feminist made it into a gender issue. Pathetic and predictable.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 04:39 AM
4

Let's just stop using goofy titles anyway. It's 2018, just call me by my name, not "Mr. Surname".
/r/MensRights16/06/18 04:35 AM
0

I think that if a man is happy with diminished sexual sensitivity and scarred genitals, he's lying to himself.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 07:56 AM
1

You've said you think people should be allowed to circumcise children, because you think it's "harmless." You have no legitimate reason to be happy with your penis, you're just thinking emotionally, and not wanting to admit you've been harmed.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 07:25 AM
2

We attacked you for saying it should be okay to do to babies. It's fine if you're happy with your own penis, as long as you realize that it's wrong to do to babies.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 05:08 AM
3

I like Lauren Campbell's answers.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 06:24 PM
2

So then why not cut off the earlobes?
/r/MensRights12/06/18 05:37 AM
8

No, it's because virtually all of them love their natural penises and never have any problems with their foreskins.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 05:36 AM
2

That skin is part of the penis.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 04:04 AM
3

Read this
/r/MensRights12/06/18 04:04 AM
5

Are earlobes an "unnecessary growth"? The foreskin is half of the penile skin, not just 1% of the penis.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 04:03 AM
4

The foreskin is a natural part of the penis, not an "unnecessary growth". And if you cut part of something off, it gets smaller. It may not get shorter, but the overall volume is still reduced.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:24 AM
4

You have less sensitivity than an intact man, even if you have no other problems.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:23 AM
4

Why are you happy to have less penis?
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:23 AM
7

99% of intact men never have to or choose to get cut.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:22 AM
6

I'm glad that you had the courage to admit you were wrong and protected your third son. His older brothers penises have been damaged beyond repair, and that sucks, but at least you broke the cycle of cutting and protected one boy.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:19 AM
9

He probably did it, but he's legally innocent until proven guilty, just like anyone else.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:15 AM
2

Good point, although I've disliked circumcision since I was 14.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 03:36 PM
3

She probably won't help him out with it
/r/MensRights09/06/18 03:35 PM
2

Agreed
/r/MensRights08/06/18 07:21 PM
39

She has a White son. Just goes to show that feminists in some cases hate even their own male relatives.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 04:47 PM
1

I don't want to antagonize you. I want to educate you on why mutilating children's genitals is wrong.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 04:46 PM
2

I'm paraphrasing, to show that you bragging about the length of your comment history is just pathetic.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 01:33 PM
2

Your viewpoint is horrific. You think that parents should be able to genitally mutilate their children.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 01:33 PM
16

As far as I'm concerned, my penis is sexually damaged beyond all repair, even though my mutilation wasn't botched. I've lost all sexual desire since I know I'll never get to truly experience sex the way it should be, though oddly enough my sex drive is still there. It's too late for me, but if I ever have a son, I'll make sure that he is protected and given the choice I never was.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:30 AM
20

u/taybrad99 is the worst of them, since she claims to be neutral, yet goes out of her way to defend MGM, and then tries to play the victim card when you call her on her bullshit.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:28 AM
3

Being mad at your parents for not cutting off your foreskin is just as dumb as being mad at your parents for not cutting off your toes, earlobes, clitoris, or any other body part.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:22 AM
3

"If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor" - Desmond Tutu
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:20 AM
2

Pulling out all the teeth makes the mouth cleaner. Plaque can build up between your teeth even if you brush twice a day. That doesn't happen if all your teeth have been pulled out.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:19 AM
1

If there are medical benefits to male genital mutilation (euphemistically referred to as "circumcision"), then how come European men, who are mostly intact, don't have higher rates of ANY of the conditions circumcision allegedly lessens/prevents than American men, who are mostly cut?
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:17 AM
2

Well, Taylor, "fem" in this case is short for "feminist", not "female", so it's not literally against women. But you're only 18, you still have a lot to learn.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:14 AM
1

Don’t act like you know what I post about unless you’ve read my entire comment history, which, by the way, is very lengthy and includes a diverse array of MANY subreddits. "My comment history is longer than yours" - u/taybrad99
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:13 AM
2

You have to deal with people giving you mild, polite, criticism for holding a horrific viewpoint. I have to deal with having mutilated genitalia for life. Who really has it worse here?
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:11 AM
2

Most women in Somalia are circumcised. What's your point?
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:10 AM
2

There's a difference between a necessary medical decision and an unnecessary cosmetic procedure that damages penile functionality. I'm appalled that you would even defend genital mutilation. You're making me feel attacked How do you think baby boys feel when their genitalia is mutilated?
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:10 AM
2

Because patriarchy /s
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:08 AM
3

I didn't put men's pleasure above women's. Read closely. What I said is that there's a difference between women not orgasming during all sex due to the natural way their anatomy works and men having massively reduced pleasure due to genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:07 AM
2

It's not something that you do FOR all male members of your family, it's something that you do TO all male members of your family. You don't have to blindly follow your family's customs, and one day, if you have a son, you should let him choose for himself if he wants to have the most sensitive parts of his genitals removed.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:05 AM
4

So then why don't you think men should have the same right to bodily integrity that women have?
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:03 AM
3

Nope. I'm doing it to draw attention to her, not to myself.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:02 AM
2

No, I did it because it was an old post, so no one would see her stupid comments otherwise.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 11:18 PM
3

If you think genital mutilation is okay, there is something deeply wrong with your moral compass.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 07:49 PM
7

Feminists want to make men's lives worse. What better way to do that than to chop up our genitals?
/r/MensRights07/06/18 07:42 PM
5

Someone from this country who is a victim of this sick "custom".
/r/MensRights07/06/18 07:41 PM
3

The sexual pleasure and gratification of both sexes is EQUALLY important. Yes, which is why cutting off part of one gender's genitals is just as wrong as cutting off part of the other gender's genitals. Don’t act like the inability to orgasm for a woman is not important for a woman but is important for a man. I never said that. I said that there is a difference between a natural biological difference and an intentional mutilation of the genitals. I’m done talking to you, you’re clearly a misogyn…
/r/MensRights07/06/18 07:41 PM
8

I don't think there's anything wrong with your natural biology. Women not orgasming during every sexual encounter is a natural biological feature, and therefore not a problem. Men having massively reduced sexual pleasure because of circumcision is an unnatural mutilation, and therefore a problem. Stop acting arrogant.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 06:52 PM
12

And circumcised men have less intense orgasms than intact men as well, so they never get to reach their peak of sexual enjoyment. And saying "there are clearly bigger fish to fry" is the fallacy of relative privation. And there's a difference between not orgasming during every sexual encounter because of your natural biology, and having extremely reduced sexual pleasure because your genitals were mutilated in infancy.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 06:33 PM
12

And you can still follow the plot of a movie if it's low-res and in black and white. That doesn't change the fact that it's more enjoyable to watch in color and HD. And unlike men, women don't need to orgasm for sex to fulfill it's biological purpose. So if you're saying that sex should be about more than simply procreating, and that pleasure is important too, then why are you okay with stripping away most of the man's pleasure? A circumcised man can still procreate (so can a circumcised women, …
/r/MensRights07/06/18 06:22 PM
3

https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1kwnkp/us_circumcision_rates_drop_by_10_percent_cdc/ Also, even if it was "normal" to be genitally mutilated ("circumcised"), most of the time, other people don't see your penis so it doesn't really matter if it looks like most men in the area's anyways...
/r/MensRights07/06/18 06:18 PM
1

Who is this directed at? Me or u/SmellyFarts123
/r/MensRights07/06/18 06:16 PM
11

Why do you think that it's okay to cut off any part of a child's genitalia? And lots of girls only have their clitoral hoods removed. And it is ridiculously easy to keep a foreskin clean. Also, the foreskin is very sensitive, and is not a "useless piece of skin". Honestly, though you may not want to admit it, circumcision removes the best parts of the penis, and a penis without a foreskin is about as enjoyable as only watching black and white 240p videos (as opposed to HD videos in full color)
/r/MensRights07/06/18 04:28 AM
3

Most circumcisions remove the frenulum in whole or part, but the foreskin itself is also very sensitive.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 04:26 AM
5

The infant circumcision rate in America is down to 60%, so leaving them intact won't make them unusual.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 04:25 AM
14

How am I a dumbass for not knowing you have a boyfriend? Am I supposed to be able to read your mind or something? Anyone who is happy that half of their penis is missing is either repressed, deluded, or both. And if your attitude towards men is not hostile, then why are you okay with mutilating their genitals, but hypocritically insisting your gender's genitals must be protected?
/r/MensRights06/06/18 09:18 PM
6

I'd rather do what's right than do what's wrong just because it's considered "normal".
/r/MensRights06/06/18 09:16 PM
5

100% of circumcisions remove the most sensitive parts of the penis.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 09:16 PM
3

They're pretty similar. Both involve amputation of functional, healthy, tissue from non-consenting children.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 09:15 PM
1

Fine: It may not be as surgically extreme as the worst types of female genital cutting, which are constantly and falsely portrayed as the vast majority of FGC by the Western media.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 09:14 PM
8

No, only ignorant and shallow women reject men for being intact. Foreskins are excellent airhead repellent.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:22 PM
4

Because you said positive things about a horrible practice.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:21 PM
9

How come we dont hear these stories in the rest of the world where men are intact and usually stay that way from birth to death? Because foreskin problems in American men overwhelmingly come from doctors who improperly retract the foreskin because they are idiots, and cause damage.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:20 PM
6

A penis isn't supposed to look like a "mushroom head".
/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:18 PM
7

Those who have had both usually don't, and even if they did, who cares? I shouldn't have parts of my dick cut off to suit someone else's preferences, since it's my dick, not theirs.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:17 PM
6

100% of circumcisions reduce penile sensitivity and diminish the victim's sex life.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:16 PM
-1

circumcised men are disgusting mutilated freaks of nature Circumcised penises are disgusting and mutilated, but it's not a freak of nature. Freak of nature implies it was always that way. Circumcision is a deliberate injury, not an unfortunate birth defect. It's not uncircumcised men that are circumcising their baby boys No, it's overwhelmingly uncircumcised women who are doing it. there is nothing wrong with being circumcised Wrong.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:14 PM
3

Exodontia* is performed because it makes it easier for people to keep their mouths clean. Unexodontised mouths can get all sorts of gross plaque and stuff in the gaps between the teeth, and if you don't keep them clean enough, they can get infected. Source: An older relative of mine had to get all of his teeth pulled because he didn't brush well enough. * Tooth pulling
/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:14 PM
2

To be honest, I hope that girl grows up to be a woman who has multiple painful childbirths.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:11 PM
1

I wonder what the point of it all is in the end... Probably to help Dr. Mutilator pay for another yacht or something, that's why most doctors push these mutilations
/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:10 PM
4

If had just one minute alone in a room with the doctor who mutilated me, I wouldn't need another minute with him afterwards.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:09 PM
8

Oftentimes, women who are not yet mothers are the most receptive to this, because parents don't want to admit they harmed their children and men don't want to admit that they themselves were harmed.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:08 PM
3

Even if some forms of FGM are worse than male "circumcision", that doesn't make either okay. Cutting off a child's entire hand is worse than cutting off one finger, but that doesn't mean cutting off one finger is okay. This is something very real, and I'm not an incel in my mom's basement. Good luck finding a boyfriend with your hostile, disrespectful attitude towards men, though.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:06 PM
0

You need to learn how to respect men.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:10 AM
2

Why should parents be allowed to decide to cut healthy, functional body parts off of children?
/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:09 AM
1

That's also the part of America with the highest male genital mutilation rate, so disregard to or even open hostility towards pro-male sentiments doesn't surprise me.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:07 AM
2

No self respecting man would ever even kiss a feminist, let alone have sex.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:04 AM
2

A migrane?
/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:04 AM
5

The only Jews that are getting hurt are the little Jewish boys who are having their genitals sliced up.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:02 AM
1

Because society as a whole doesn't value men nearly as much as women, and 13 Reasons Why was geared at society as a whole.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:01 AM
8

Any parent who circumcised their child belongs behind bars, no matter how much they claim to regret it.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 06:00 AM
2

:)
/r/MensRights05/06/18 11:56 PM
3

"Genital cutting" would probably be better as a descriptor for both sexes, since it gets across the point (this is a cutting of a child's genitals) without using inflammatory language that makes a lot of cut men act defensively and not listen.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 09:37 PM
3

If you are circumcised, you don't have (fully) functional genitalia. You have semi-functional genitalia.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 09:36 PM
3

The vast, vast, majority of Christian Europeans are intact.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 09:44 PM
1

Europeans are mostly intact/uncircumcised, though.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 07:15 PM
1

Yes, but if they're done having children, there's no reason to net let loose.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 03:35 AM
2

If they've done it to their children, they deserve much worse than just some mean words on the internet.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 02:14 AM
3

Fair enough. Far too often, I see intactivists being too "soft" in order to protect circumcised men's feelings, which I think dilutes our message, though.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 11:37 PM
2

So you didn't circumcise him? If so, thank you. I know it can be hard to stand up to societal and cultural pressures, but protecting children is worth it. None of my friends have had children yet, since I'm only 20, but if they did and circumcised them, they would be out of my life with no chance to become a part of it again.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 10:19 PM
2

Please don't circumcise your son. It should be his choice, not yours or your SO's. After all, it's your son's penis, not yours or your SO's.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 10:07 PM
2

I'm not close to mine, either. I don't hate them, nor do I try to keep them at a distance, so I'd say I'm "average" with my relationship from them - neither exceptionally close nor distant nor estranged.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 09:32 PM
2

Fair enough. I would never forgive my parents for doing it to me, even if they were pressured or outright forced into it. I have to live with only half of my penis, so they have to live without my forgiveness.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 09:04 PM
5

Imagine cutting off a baby girl's clitoris if you found that 80% of the men you asked preferred it.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 08:50 PM
5

I hope you made the right choice and left him whole. Any woman who would reject him for having his entire penis isn't a good woman anyway. Foreskins are excellent airhead repellent.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 08:50 PM
5

Why did you forgive your parents? I'd never forgive mine, not even if they got on their knees and begged.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 08:49 PM
4

I wish my father had felt like you do.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 08:47 PM
6

They're not "foamier", they're absolutely right. I don't know what it's like to have a normal penis, and I likely never will. I just no what it's like to have a partial penis, or a "penis remnant" if you will.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 08:46 PM
5

I hate that it was done to me, resent my parents for agreeing to it, and hate the whole medical industry for doing this to me. I feel violated and mutilated, and sometimes I feel like I would rather have no penis than a circumcised one. I realize that this is fairly extreme, even for men who dislike being circumcised. But does your husband really want even a 1% chance that his son will grow up to feel like this?
/r/MensRights03/06/18 08:45 PM
1

At least it will raise awareness.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 04:46 AM
6

This is amazing. My penis has been ruined beyond repair (unless r/foregen pans out), but it brings me joy to know that Danish boys will be protected and given the choice I never was. I'll never have a good sex life, because it's impossible if you're circumcised, and honestly I'm still pissed about that, but it really does warm my heart to know that others will.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 04:22 AM
2

I'm also staying celibate for now.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 08:13 PM
2

I envy both intact men and women. I'd happily give birth and menstruate if it meant my genitals were protected from mutilation.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 07:29 AM
1

If I was ever with a woman who said she liked that I was circumcised (not likely, since I'm restoring, so my days of appearing circumcised are numbered) or that she preferred circumcised penises, I would tell her, deadpan, "I don't like your labia, you should get those trimmed." When she objected and called me horrible, I'd call her on her double standard. (Since there seem to be a lot of stupid circumfetish trolls that come here: I don't actually want women to cut off their labia)
/r/MensRights26/05/18 07:28 AM
1

Yeah, I don't remotely care what women think about my penis. It's mine, for my satisfaction and pleasure, not theirs. If they want a penis that's been redesigned for their pleasure, they can order a custom dildo and leave me the fuck alone.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 07:26 AM
1

Also, the "women prefer it" excuse just makes me avoid sex, since if I was mutilated in order to "please women sexually", you can bet your ass I'll go out of my way to avoid ever pleasing a woman sexually.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 07:24 AM
2

Wow! Such an intelligent response!
/r/MensRights25/05/18 05:31 PM
2

Yes, I will, and no, I'm not.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 05:30 PM
1

I read what you're saying, and you're clearly saying that you think it's acceptable to do to infants.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 05:30 PM
1

What other parental choice involves cutting off a healthy body part?
/r/MensRights25/05/18 05:30 PM
1

Why should your parents get to choose how much of your body you get to keep?
/r/MensRights25/05/18 08:14 AM
1

If you're not saying it shouldn't be done, then you are implicitly saying you think it's an okay thing to do.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 08:13 AM
2

You really think the possibility of minor health benefits is worth a second-rate sex life?
/r/MensRights25/05/18 08:11 AM
2

Then why not let the man whose penis it is weigh the reasons when he's old enough to decide for himself whether or not to cut half the skin on his penis off?
/r/MensRights25/05/18 08:10 AM
3

I don't even want to watch it, but I've already decided that any son I have will be left intact even if I have to fight my future wife and family for him. Any parent who actually wants to mutilate and torture their son in this way should be forced to watch this video on a loop until they realize it's wrong.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 08:09 AM
2

Thanks. Now I know to avoid listening to Aguilera's "music", if you can even call it that.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 06:14 PM
6

And the sick thing is how overwhelmingly upvoted this clip is on YouTube. I downvoted it, but my downvote is just a drop in the bucket.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 05:17 PM
1

Whose son? Aguilera's or Bullock's?
/r/MensRights19/05/18 05:15 PM
2

Padding your credentials and making other people think you're smart?
/r/MensRights18/05/18 07:07 PM
1

I remember somewhere that she just essentially said she did it because of religion and she didn't really care about anything else. God is all-powerful, and will be fine with or without you. Your son is helpless, and needs your protection.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 05:40 PM
1

It's all for the love of strange medicine.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 05:39 PM
1

This is why I don't take her preaching about consent or sexism seriously.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 05:38 PM
9

Yeah, this is the big reason all the "MeToo" Cosby/Weinstein shit rang hollow with me. From the "penis facials" to Bialik hanging her son's foreskin on the wall, Hollywood women are the last people worth talking to about consent.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 05:36 PM
3

Brian Morris has entered the comments section! That dude is so predictable...
/r/MensRights17/05/18 10:02 PM
6

What the fuck is wrong with people? Seriously...
/r/MensRights17/05/18 10:02 PM
10

Do whatever you want to your own penis for religion, but leave everyone else's penises alone.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 08:01 PM
2

This is a really stupid article, but Kimmel has written one good article at least.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 07:40 AM
1

There's also the concern that doctors could do it nonconsensually. I've read about that before
/r/MensRights11/05/18 06:29 AM
1

I'm not married, it was just a hypothetical fear of mine.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 02:04 AM
1

I'm just worried that when I have kids, Mrs. MenDeserveRights or the doctor will get it done behind my back.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 10:54 PM
1

Exactly. That's why I've just chosen to take myself out of the dating market. They don't deserve me.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 09:09 PM
3

In America, mothers sign a majority of circumcision consent forms.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 09:05 PM
3

Does it really matter if they regret it? They still did it. Even if my parents felt deeply sorry and apologized, I wouldn't ever forgive them, since forgiving them wouldn't fix my penis. They screwed up, and it's too late to make amends. But to each his own.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 09:00 PM
2

I didn't realize that. Also, do you know how to switch back to the old reddit view?
/r/MensRights06/05/18 08:20 PM
5

It still is the cutting off of a body part. Let your sons make their own decisions about their penises.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 02:14 AM
5

Circumcision involves the amputation of the foreskin, and if it really reduced the risk of HIV (which is capitalized, BTW), then how come Europe, where most men are not circumcised, has a lower rate of HIV infection than America, where most men are?
/r/MensRights06/05/18 01:01 AM
6

The difference is that none of those involve amputating body parts.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 12:36 AM
6

It shouldn't be the parents' decision, because it's not their penis.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 12:22 AM
5

You're wrong. It's about every person, male or female, having the right to decide for themselves if they want part of their genitalia amputated. And it's not a false equivalency.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 12:22 AM
2

No, u/taybrad99 deleted only her OP, not her account
/r/MensRights05/05/18 11:15 PM
6

Circumcision removes almost all the sensitivity from the penis. A circumcised penis can penetrate and ejaculate, but there is very little pleasure. But that's not really what I meant. What I meant was that from an ethical standpoint, cutting off a healthy, functional body part from a child is equally wrong no matter what part you cut off.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 11:14 PM
3

Would you ask them to cut off their clitoris because you think it looks better?
/r/MensRights05/05/18 11:12 PM
2

You disagreed with "'aesthetic benefits' are entirely subjective."
/r/MensRights05/05/18 11:12 PM
4

No, aesthetics is inherently subjective. My parents think cut looks better, I don't. It's my penis, so it should have been my choice.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 09:48 PM
4

No, but in some ways, it's just as bad.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 09:47 PM
6

It's not the parents' penis, so it's not their right to cut part of it off. There are no aesthetic benefits, it makes the penis ugly.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 09:47 PM
8

Cutting off genitalia is abusive.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 07:59 PM
6

Parental preferences should not be allowed to supersede the child's rights.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 07:56 PM
2

Stretching the skin out won't undue anything. *Undo
/r/MensRights05/05/18 07:54 PM
4

You are the one talking about removing rights. No. You don't have the right to cut parts of children off.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 07:53 PM
4

Having part of your genitalia removed is a serious problem, dude.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 07:52 PM
3

The medical benefits are so incredibly minuscule that they are irrelevant, and "aesthetic benefits" are entirely subjective.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 07:51 PM
3

Since when is having part of your body amputated without your consent a right? Like what kind of insane troll logic is that?
/r/MensRights05/05/18 07:48 PM
3

If it's not cut off, then how is it removed? Voodoo magic?
/r/MensRights05/05/18 07:47 PM
5

I agree. The right of adult men to get circumcised if they want to should not be trampled on. Doing it to a minor tramples on their rights, though.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 07:47 PM
1

And this is one of the biggest reasons I'm a right-winger.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 07:46 PM
4

Christians? Christians don't ever circumcise for religious reasons.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 07:45 PM
5

I agree that it's good that most posts there condemn MGM, I was just pointing out that some people really do think that it's fucked-up and backwards to protect boys, which shows that some feminists are truly quite misandrist. Also, the person who posted this is a teenage girl, which makes it even more concerning, because if the upcoming generation has a lot of people who think like this...
/r/MensRights05/05/18 05:45 PM
5

" All I wanna say is that they don't really care about us" - Michael Jackson
/r/MensRights04/05/18 08:25 PM
2

Just like rights means "women's but not men's rights" to most of the world.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 05:12 PM
1

Some are believers Some don't know Some are lost They're lost and alone
/r/MensRights03/05/18 03:27 AM
3

How is this not from the Onion?
/r/MensRights03/05/18 03:23 AM
1

Makes sense
/r/MensRights02/05/18 11:34 PM
3

Why would you be friends with someone like this?
/r/MensRights02/05/18 05:26 PM
1

The problem with that is people might then think it's an intactivism-related post, which it isn't.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 05:26 PM
3

Well then, meet me.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 04:02 AM
5

Well, it's legal to mutilate male genitalia but not female genitalia, so I'm not really surprised by this.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 03:54 AM
9

I don't agree with transgenderism either, but it's irrelevant to the discussion. Even if they're mentally ill, they're at least getting what they wanted, not just what their parents wanted.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 03:38 AM
2

As long as they're not violent, they're fine.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 11:43 PM
9

What about the basic human right to bodily integrity?
/r/MensRights30/04/18 11:42 PM
17

There's a difference between mutilating your own genitals (which you can do as much as you want, after all, they are your genitals) and mutilating a helpless infant's genitals (which should be illegal, since they are someone else's genitals)
/r/MensRights30/04/18 11:41 PM
6

Cowards.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 04:51 AM
10

Not her penis, not her choice.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 04:50 AM
2

You should try to restore - that could help with tightness
/r/MensRights29/04/18 09:10 PM
5

It's fine if you're happy with your penis, as long as you don't circumcise your sons. Let them decide for themselves.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 09:09 PM
6

It would actually be more meaningful if it was chosen by an adult, rather than forced on a kid.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 09:08 PM
30

You don't get to carve your religious beliefs into someone else's genitals. It's really that simple.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 07:18 AM
6

Who cares if it's practiced by a minority? Practices need to be evaluated on their own merit, and not given a pass just because a minority does them.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 06:11 AM
16

The only problem with Iceland's proposed ban of infant circumcision is that it didn't pass.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 09:39 PM
2

You should read this whole comment thread Despite having left her son intact, she seems intent on defending parents who mutilate.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 05:46 PM
3

Exactly. I'm an adult now. If I wanted to cut off my foreskin, or implant whiskers and get my teeth reshapen to look more feline (someone actually did this), that would be fine. What's not fine is forcing the procedure on infants.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 03:19 PM
1

The foreskin is part of the penis. When you cut it off, you have less penis. This isn't rocket science, bro.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 07:20 AM
1

Thank you for caring about MGM. Far too many people in my country don't.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 07:19 AM
2

As long as you are anti-MGM, you are my ally.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 07:19 AM
5

I'm furious with my parents for doing this to me. It's no better than the clitorectomies done to young girls in Africa. The way I see it, it's fine if you're happy with your own circumcision as long as you don't inflict it on your son.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 05:33 AM
5

Hurt people hurt people...
/r/MensRights27/04/18 05:31 AM
9

Who cares what women prefer? It's not their penis.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 03:16 AM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights27/04/18 03:07 AM
3

Sadly, yes. My (secular, liberal, nominally Christian) parents mutilated me, and so did most parents of boys I know. No way in hell I'll ever let anyone circumcise any son of mine.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 03:07 AM
3

How come? It's women who push for circumcision because they think "it's more attractive" At least in America that's the case
/r/MensRights26/04/18 10:50 PM
2

Andrew who?
/r/MensRights26/04/18 10:41 PM
3

Mothers sign a majority of circumcision consent forms.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 10:36 PM
1

When in reality, mothers are a far greater danger to sons (circumcision) than men ever have been to women.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 04:19 PM
6

feminist triggering intensifies
/r/MensRights26/04/18 03:05 AM
52

FEMALE PROBLEMS Dress code violations Imagined microaggressions Occasional sexual comments MALE PROBLEMS Genital mutilation Longer prison sentences More likely to lose custody of your own child
/r/MensRights25/04/18 10:52 PM
1

European Liberals aren't center right...center right is someone like Paul Ryan or Marco Rubio. (i.e. Republicans who aren't affiliated with Trump or the Tea Party)
/r/MensRights25/04/18 03:15 PM
2

No because girls are precious and boys are disposable. That's just the way our society works, as much as feminists want to deny it.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 05:45 AM
9

This is a religious nutjob hearing what he wants to hear. The "Board of Deputies" is not an official Icelandic organization.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 05:20 AM
1

How much do you want to bet that she mutilated his genitalia in infancy?
/r/MensRights25/04/18 03:05 AM
1

Some mothers see those videos and mutilate their sons anyway Stuff like this is why I have a hard time trusting women.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 08:14 PM
2

The UN promotes MGM, I think
/r/MensRights24/04/18 08:11 PM
2

Michael Jackson was right. They don't care about us.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 07:12 AM
1

lol
/r/MensRights24/04/18 07:11 AM
4

Just because it's religious doesn't mean it's not abusive.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 03:29 AM
6

Childbirth isn't nearly as traumatic as circumcision.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 03:29 AM
4

Cutting off body parts for "hygiene" is just stupid.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 11:58 PM
3

So is bodily integrity.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 08:03 PM
3

Religious freedom is always secondary to human rights.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 03:15 PM
5

It's a spiritually uplifting act for the parents who are inflicting it, not for the child whose genitals are being tortured. A child is being mutilated to please the parents, this is wrong.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 03:14 PM
1

Fair point. I'd just rather talk about Men's Rights then get into debates about philosophy
/r/MensRights23/04/18 08:07 AM
8

No, it's not. All I'm saying is people should have a say as to whether or not their parents' religion (which they may not believe in) is branded on them.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 07:17 AM
9

Yes, it is. Their cognitive abilities have not developed to the extent where they can consider religious propositions and decide whether or not to believe in them.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 07:16 AM
3

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 07:15 AM
8

Protecting children from harm matters more to me than accommodating religions sensibilities. Sorry, dude.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 07:09 AM
9

Infants have no religion.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 07:07 AM
2

They tried and failed to overturn the ruling.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 07:07 AM
6

You believe you have a commandment from God. Your son may not grow up to share your belief.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 07:06 AM
1

That's a fair point, but a discussion of whether Harris is a valid philosopher is really off topic for Men's Rights
/r/MensRights23/04/18 06:43 AM
7

And Orthodox Jews are less than 1% of America, so the tent is barely shrinking.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 06:28 AM
1

Most professional philosophers don't care for Harris.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 06:28 AM
5

You're the one who calls everyone else on this sub confused and foolish, so you're kind of calling the kettle black right now.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 05:47 AM
2

Did you forget about the Christian bakers who were compelled by the government to bake a cake for a gay wedding?
/r/MensRights23/04/18 05:46 AM
4

"From my point of view, the Jedi are evil" You right now
/r/MensRights23/04/18 05:45 AM
2

Doing the right thing isn't always easy, but it's always right.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 05:45 AM
4

The only one who is humiliating themselves here is you.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 05:44 AM
8

Intactivism is part of Men's Rights. If you don't like that, don't associate yourself with Men's Rights. We already have a lot of enemies, one more wouldn't hurt.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 05:42 AM
12

Your right to practice your religion ends where someone else's body begins. Children are not property.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 05:42 AM
1

Aristotle and Plato lived in a different time, and the Dalai Lama is a religious leader, not a philosopher. But this is really OT for this sub.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 05:41 AM
3

Sam Harris isn't a legitimate philosopher. He's never published any peer-reviewed work on philosophy, nor taught it at any college, nor does he have a graduate degree in philosophy.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 05:37 PM
3

Because Sam Harris is literally human garbage.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 05:36 PM
2

You can't fix crazy.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 05:35 PM
3

I'm not sure I'd actually want them to know about it. They're almost 60, so they aren't going to have any more children, and I'd rather not have the awkward conversation. If my brother decides to have kids, I'd talk to him about it, but I just see no point to discussing it with my parents.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 08:39 AM
5

There's nothing good rattling around that head of his. Just plans for preemptive nuclear attacks on the Middle East. (Yes, really)
/r/MensRights22/04/18 08:38 AM
6

Sam Harris is just an idiot. An eloquent, well-read idiot, but an idiot nonetheless.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 08:37 AM
7

Harris is an idiot. A recap of some of his greatest hits Said that religion is worse then rape Thinks some beliefs might be dangerous enough to justify murdering people who have them Proposed a pre-emptive nuclear strike on the Middle East Came from a rich Hollywood family, spend more than a decade smoking weed and traveling around Asia, didn't graduate college until age 33 Claims to be a philosopher and neuroscientist, despite the fact that he's never done any peer-reviewed work in either disci…
/r/MensRights22/04/18 08:36 AM
3

I don't think my parents even know what Foregen or intactivism is.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 08:28 AM
3

I strongly suspect that you guys will succeed within the next 3-5 years, what I'm not sure of is if I'll have the money to fly to Italy and then buy the procedure lol And then there's also the question of coming up with an excuse to tell my friends and family as to why I'm suddenly flying to Italy for a month. (I've never talked to my parents about circumcision, and never will)
/r/MensRights22/04/18 06:16 AM
5

Sadly, I don't know anyone at Harvard. But I really hope that intactivism is finally having its gay rights moment.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 06:06 AM
6

Best of luck with the event! Sadly, I'm not in the area.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 04:37 AM
6

But I think that "male genital mutilation" is oft-putting to too many people. Calling it "male genital cutting" is a less inflammatory way to get the same point across.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 06:44 PM
11

Calling someone "uncircumcised" is just as stupid as calling someone "unlobotomised", "unclitorectomised", or "unvasectomised"
/r/MensRights21/04/18 06:43 PM
11

Stuff like this is why I don't want to date women, despite being straight.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 06:39 PM
2

Bobbitt cut off her husband's entire penis...this isn't really related to intactivism
/r/MensRights19/04/18 02:23 PM
4

Why? In intending to continue the current, more damaging form of circumcision, you're already implicitly admitting that practices can change, since you're deviating from the original biblical norm.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 03:24 AM
3

So then how do you reconcile this with the fact that the original Biblical circumcision only removed the tip of the foreskin, and not all of it?
/r/MensRights18/04/18 09:52 PM
4

Circumcision has the same physical effects regardless of the religion of the child's parents.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 09:52 PM
7

Your sons are not your property.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 09:51 PM
4

You do want to impose a change on your son's penis, though.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 09:50 PM
7

Infants don't have a religion.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 09:49 PM
4

I'm not confused. And I'm angry at you for refusing to listen to any viewpoint but your own, not because I'm circumcised.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 09:14 PM
7

I'm angry that it's legal to cut off part of a newborn's penis.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 08:13 PM
5

Wrong. People get to decide for themselves what religion they are. You are religious, but your sons may not grow up to be.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 08:12 PM
12

Who cares what women prefer? If they want a penis that has been redesigned to their specifications, they should order a custom dildo.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 03:31 PM
13

Tradition doesn't make you right. Make no mistake about this. You get to be circumcised. I don't want to force you into anything. But you do not get to force circumcision onto others.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 03:29 PM
6

You can't even spell it properly, though.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 03:28 PM
6

There are only three groups of boys that need to be circumcised: Muslims, Jews, and boys at risk of phimosis (or some similar medical requirement). There's no such thing as a Jewish or Muslim baby. Babies have no religion, so your argument is invalid. But your argument demands that it not be done even when required, which is a problem. You need to change your opinion to avoid creating a problem where one does not exist. I have nothing against it being done as a last resort to treat a condition t…
/r/MensRights18/04/18 03:20 PM
7

If you don't want people to call you on what you say, don't say it.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 03:12 PM
5

Stop calling everyone who you disagree with "confused". It just makes you look childish.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 03:12 PM
9

Circumcision is like vaccination or removing a cleft palate in that you are helping your child before your child consents to the procedure. Circumcision doesn't help the vast majority of baby boys it's done to. The medical benefits are negligible at best, and the loss of erogenous tissue is a major downside. In religious law, you are obligated to help a person when they are not aware that they can come at a loss without your intervention. I'm unsure what you think boys left intact would come to …
/r/MensRights18/04/18 06:07 AM
10

Attacking people who never harmed you makes you a jerk. Circumcisers did harm me.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 06:04 AM
11

Being an asshole to people who have not bothered you and have no intention of bothering you is not a good thing. It's a lot better than chopping up a child's genitalia.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 06:04 AM
1

What did the removed comment say?
/r/MensRights17/04/18 04:20 PM
3

Exactly. I actually took a class on Judaism last year, and I was surprised to learn how much the religion has changed already.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 02:10 PM
6

I agree, but it's also important not to extent the wonderful Jewish and Muslim intactivists
/r/MensRights17/04/18 05:20 AM
1

What's the HDTV meme?
/r/MensRights16/04/18 10:39 PM
4

Because women need to be protected from wicked, evil men, despite being just as strong as men /s Seriously, feminist "logic" makes no sense whatsoever.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 08:16 PM
44

Age: 40 Never married and no kids, but I want these things Does she not know the meaning of the word "menopause"?
/r/MensRights16/04/18 06:20 PM
2

If you ever have a son, please don't circumcise him. The health benefits are incredibly minor at best, and it removes the most sensitive part of the penis. I feel horribly violated that my parents just cut off part of my penis without caring how I felt about it, so please don't do it to your son. (If you ever have one) 99% of men with a foreskin never have any problems with it.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 03:34 PM
3

Tucker Carlson?
/r/MensRights16/04/18 03:18 PM
1

I agree with you on this. All infant circumcisions are horrific, but Jewish circumcisions, which are based in thousands of years of tradition and deep religious convictions, are arguably the least horrific, since they at least have a reason behind them other than "I want him to look like dad". That said, all circumcision of infants should be banned, religious or not.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 05:58 AM
1

The vast majority of Gypsies are intact. I know several, and it is not a normal practice in their culture. (Very few Gypsies are Muslims, and virtually none are Jewish)
/r/MensRights16/04/18 03:24 AM
1

It's just like that old Michael Jackson song - "They Don't Care About Us"
/r/MensRights15/04/18 05:20 PM
2

This seems like a good idea, but a lot of the time. mothers don't care that they're hurting their child with circumcision It would probably still sway a few women, though.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 05:20 PM
3

I agree with most of this, but being circumcised is in itself a form of discrimination and abuse. And I think that Europe may be there by the 2020s, but it's still like 60% in America, and very culturally ingrained. It's an uphill slope, but I won't lose hope.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 05:13 PM
1

Interestingly enough, polygamy actually benefits women more than men, since it ensures most women will get a high-status husband, but the lower-status men don't get a wife. It's somewhat counterintuitive, since most people think that polygamy was something men did to increase their own power.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 05:12 PM
2

Given that it's still legal for mothers to mutilate their babies' penises in all 50 states, this doesn't remotely surprise me.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 05:14 AM
1

I don't trust anyone from Bluecheckistan.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 09:29 PM
2

I’m sorry your mom did that to you and I hope the practice is abolished soon. But we women aren’t all awful, I promise. Thank you, and I don't think that women are all awful, but I am glad my mother had difficult births because of what she did to us.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 07:55 PM
2

Exactly. The female genitals are literally a gaping hole that secretes fluids once a month, yet somehow it's the male genitals that need to be cut up for hygiene? Miss me with that illogical BS.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 07:14 PM
1

Yes, but neither a c-section nor an episiotomy permanently removes a body part, let alone the most sexually sensitive body part. Both me and my brother's birth were very difficult and painful for my mother, but since she had both of us cut, I don't feel remotely bad for her. In some ways, it feels like karmic justice to me. I'm thrilled that you left your sons intact, they will thank you some day.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 07:13 PM
2

My mom is a feminist and she believes that mutilating male genitals is okay. Feminists need to stop pretending to care about gender equality and be honest that they only care about advancing women at the expense of men.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 03:22 AM
3

Let's hope they lose their seats in November.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 03:14 AM
15

What is up with feminists and cutting up men's genitals? First circumcision, now this?
/r/MensRights14/04/18 02:55 AM
3

Yet the feminists still claim women are the oppressed ones. Such bullshit.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 11:50 PM
2

Agreed. And I have very mixed feelings about regret parents. On one hand, they may be useful to the movement, but on the other hand, what they've done is unforgivable.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 11:49 PM
11

Having half of my dick chopped of for no real reason as an infant.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 05:44 PM
8

I kind of understand how people who don't realize that it's mutilation could do it, but how could you recognize that it's mutilation, write a paper about it, but then do it anyway? She's unfit to be a mother.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 04:34 PM
8

It's borderline pedophilic - carving your sexual preferences into your children.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 03:37 PM
7

The funny thing is it had the opposite effect on me - I'm embarrassed by being mutilated, so I go to great lengths to ensure that no one, male or female, gets to see my penis.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 03:36 PM
3

The woman who I linked to? Her son was born in 2016, unfortunately. And one of the worst things about it is that from reading her other posts (in order to downvote all of the ones that hadn't been archived yet), seems like she has a very good sex life. Few things irritate me more than a circumcising mother having a good sex life, since they have forever ruined their son's ability to have the same.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 03:33 PM
6

In some ways, it's a good thing, since it allows us to sort out shallow and thoughtless idiots from women who would actually make good partners.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 03:31 PM
7

Among many other things, they never have to worry about being cut up as a child. This is one of many reasons that arguments about "male privilege" have always rung hollow to me.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 03:31 PM
3

This is why I half want to just go MGTOW, but on the other hand, I want to have a son and leave him intact so I can break the cycle.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 03:28 PM
4

I find it curious how anyone cares what women think a penis should look like. If they want a penis that has been redesigned to suit their preferences, they should order a custom dildo.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 03:17 PM
2

That's why I've decided to not even try dating/sex until I've restored to a point where I can pass as intact. If then, a woman rejects me for seeming to be intact, I will feel relieved, since I dodged a bullet in avoiding a pro-mutilation idiot.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 03:16 PM
2

If you don't think men deserve the right to decide what happens to their own genitals, you don't really support men's rights.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 04:46 AM
4

Yes, I'm here, but I use a VPN and have never posted any personally identifiable details here. I've talked about circumcision with only a few close friends.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 04:39 AM
1

I don't really want to go public with intactivism right now - I'm not sure how my parents would react, and I'm still financially dependent on them.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 03:24 AM
15

Young boys need to not be circumcised, actually.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 08:45 PM
1

My econ prof just showed us that graph last Friday
/r/MensRights12/04/18 02:58 PM
1

A woman shares her story and it's somehow misogynistic. WTF r/videos?
/r/MensRights12/04/18 03:56 AM
7

My college isn't on the list :(
/r/MensRights11/04/18 11:13 PM
6

The foreskin is so much more than just a little skin, it's the most sensitive part of the penis.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 03:38 PM
1

Young men have every right to be angry, and the vast majority of feminists (which is not interchangeable with women in general) don't care one bit what happens to men.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 05:26 AM
1

There are site rules against it, but they're not for good reasons. That said, I'll obey the rules even if I disagree with them.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 05:25 AM
1

If you really want to know her name, just google the text in the tweet in quotations, and you will find the original tweet. i.e., search "I'm trying not to get cynical about what is a totally devastating tragedy but the maleness" in Google, with the quotation marks around it.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 05:24 AM
1

If someone posts something with their name attached to it somewhere else, it should be allowed to post their name attached to it here. That's not doxxing. Doxxing would be finding out the identities of people who post things anonymously and then leaking that information.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 05:22 AM
1

I think it's good to let your feelings guide your judgement.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 05:18 AM
1

You don't turn a lie into the truth by repeating it over and over.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 05:16 AM
1

Seriously, what is the point of comments like this?
/r/MensRights11/04/18 03:47 AM
2

Circumcision is one topic that is very uncomfortable to discuss in public, because it combines sex, violence, and religion. But please, don't cut your sons. Every man should get to decide for himself how much of his penis he wants to keep.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 02:09 AM
3

People are more open about it on the internet. I wouldn't be nearly this open in person, because I'm a lot more worried about social judgement in person than as an anonymous redditor.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 01:27 AM
2

Then you haven't looked around enough. Here, look at r/foreskin_restoration
/r/MensRights11/04/18 01:03 AM
2

As someone whose parents circumcised me, please don't circumcise your kids. It's their penis, it should be their decision.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 01:02 AM
4

The doctors are just everyday men and woman who have dedicated a lot of their time to help everyday people. I'm interested in hearing how you think mutilating children's genitals is "helping everyday people".
/r/MensRights10/04/18 11:41 PM
8

So all the other health benefits are irrelevant? Bodily integrity and human rights > extremely minor health benefits
/r/MensRights10/04/18 11:38 PM
5

So even though the "benefits of male circumcision outweigh the risks" (https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/male-circumcision-benefits-outweigh-risks-cdc-says/), there are still risks. The CDC is wrong about this, and most other Western medical associations agree that they're wrong.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 11:37 PM
7

I'd rather have a "cottage cheese dick" than only have half of a dick.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 11:35 PM
7

There are MUCH bigger fish which need frying. This is a first-world problem, with first-world sufferers, and first-world solutions. Well, this problem effects me, in a way that third-world problems don't. In fact, if I had to chose between being a mutilated American like I am now, or an intact but impoverished third-worlder, I'd trade in a heartbeat. And I'm dead serious.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 11:33 PM
8

I don't understand how any cut man could not feel bad. I'm cut, and I hate it. I hate Dr. Mutilator as well.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 11:31 PM
7

Why are you okay with having a greedy doctor trick your parents into cutting off half of your penis?
/r/MensRights10/04/18 11:30 PM
8

The doctor holds the most blame, but he was just doing his job. This is an example of the Superior Orders/Nuremberg defense
/r/MensRights10/04/18 11:29 PM
49

Good. Let's get it down to 0% now.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 11:25 PM
4

What, that Foregen will hopefully be successful in the next couple years? I know it's optimistic, but I think they're making good progress.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 11:12 PM
5

What's bjj?
/r/MensRights10/04/18 05:34 PM
8

Yikes! Hope she's okay now.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 05:24 PM
7

What's spinal fusion?
/r/MensRights10/04/18 05:18 PM
3

Thank you
/r/MensRights10/04/18 05:05 PM
5

Well, circumcised men will never really get any significant amount of pleasure out of sex. For now, restoring is the best option, but hopefully r/foregen will succeed in the next couple years.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 05:05 PM
16

What did your girlfriend think of the film?
/r/MensRights10/04/18 05:03 PM
1

But you're not "just doing what you"re told" if you're also doing other things - like asking questions and get other opinions. That's actually the opposite of just doing what you're told. Still, failure to even consider that mutilating your child's genitalia is a bad idea represents a huge failure to think logically. And now you're allowing that same mistake to make your medical decisions for you and control your relationship with your parents. I hope that works out OK for you. I don't hate my p…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 02:26 PM
1

Unless they literally just did what they were told to do, with no questions or the general medical "knowledge" laypeople had the time, then it's by definition not blind obedience. Literally just doing what you're told to do is the definition of blind obedience. I don't really care why they did it - I've never asked them, and I never will. There's no excuse good enough. If there's no possible combination of explanations, your own research, and second opinions that would change your mind, you're b…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 04:27 AM
1

I've never PMed you. You must be confusing me with someone else.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 10:33 PM
4

You're the one who believes that Children who don't follow their parents' religion are confused Conservative and Reform Jews aren't actually Jewish Religion can't change at all, and must stay exactly the way it was hundreds of years ago Yet you call us backwards? I think you're projecting...
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:22 PM
7

Meanwhile, still no human rights charges for cutting into a baby boy's penis.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:30 PM
2

The vast majority of Jews don't do this - it's only the ultra-Orthodox who do.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:28 PM
2

Being willing to accept medical advice from a medical professional isn't a sign of brainwashing, it's a sign that you understand what their field of expertise is, and reflexively ignoring their advice is certainly even dumber than taking it into careful consideration. Blindly listening to a doctor who tells you to chop up your son's penis isn't exactly brainwashing, but it is blind obedience to authority. Skepticism and second opinions are good, but this feels more like paranoia. Me not removing…
/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:27 PM
2

That doesn't change the fact that the parents are still the responsible party. Yes, I get that they didn't do it maliciously, which is why I don't hate them, but they're still responsible, and I'll never trust their judgement with regards to anything remotely medical again. The parent which parents least parents best.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:12 PM
2

I was born in the Midwestern US several decades earlier, in an area where the rate was at least 90%. Again, the only people my parents even heard of who didn't cut their boys were ones that simply couldn't afford "proper, modern medical care". So then it's different for you. Doctors cut babies without their parents' consent a lot in those days as well. Whereas my parents had lots of experience with computers and investigative journalism and research when I was born. Yours have an excuse, mine do…
/r/MensRights09/04/18 07:36 AM
3

They could have and should have realized that cutting off healthy body parts is wrong. And no, there were ample opportunities for them to know. I was born in the late 1990s, and both of my parents are well-educated people. 20% of babies born in my region in my year were left intact, whereas less than a percent were probably left unvaccinated. I don't see how going with the best medical advice available to you at the time could ever be "bad judgement", no matter how terrible the results. Because …
/r/MensRights09/04/18 05:19 AM
2

It's the cold weather there...everyone's brain is frozen.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 05:17 AM
5

Removing body parts for "sanitary reasons" is just ludicrous.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:33 AM
7

Done.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:32 AM
4

What are we going to be blaming you for in a few decades based on information that you simply don't have right now? If I do something bad, even if I didn't realize it was bad, I would fully expect to be blamed for it, because I still did it. Especially if that something bad destroyed someone else's genitalia. They still did it to you, and they should have realized that cutting off part of the penis isn't a good idea. I don't hate my parents, because I know it wasn't malicious, but I don't trust …
/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:31 AM
1

That's not why I said he was stupid. I said he was stupid because he confused orgasm with organism.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 02:39 AM
2

u/Clawedd is not very intelligent. Intelligent people don't say things like you don't get organism from handshakes
/r/MensRights09/04/18 01:00 AM
2

I am for evidence based western medicine Denmark, Iceland, Norway, and Germany aren't Western countries since when?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 12:52 AM
2

Male circumcision can dramatically reduce a man’s risk of acquiring HIV infection by 50 to 60 percent during sex with HIV infected female partners This is done by dividing two minuscule percentages by each other to get a seemingly large number. parents should be able to decide with patients doctors to circumcise newborns. Why should someone else get to decide to cut of part of my penis?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 12:49 AM
9

Who cares if they meant well or not? OP is suffering because of their decisions. Why would I be thankful I still have one?
/r/MensRights08/04/18 11:38 PM
11

Why are you happy your mom cut off half of your dick?
/r/MensRights08/04/18 11:37 PM
10

Here! Have a downvote!
/r/MensRights08/04/18 11:37 PM
6

They still signed off on it. You can and should blame and distrust them, since they signed off on it and had bad judgement, but you shouldn't hate them, since it wasn't done maliciously.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 11:36 PM
2

What would you say to your own son or tell him to do to help him feel better about it? Why would you feel remotely sorry for a regret parent? They made their own bed, let them lie in it.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 11:36 PM
37

But that would be different because patriarchy!!!!!! /s
/r/MensRights08/04/18 11:33 PM
2

Yes, it's less shitty, but still really shitty.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 09:54 PM
6

Everybody's crazy.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 08:58 PM
15

No, any mother who did this to her son(s) has already crossed the Rubicon in terms of forgiveness. This mother had no idea it was even happening, so she's not responsible.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 08:57 PM
53

She didn't consent or even know about the circumcision. The baby's Muslim father and grandmother did it behind her back.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 08:56 PM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 08:24 PM
13

This is ridiculous. "Your son will hate you if you don't bring him up in my religion." Who actually believes that nonsense?
/r/MensRights08/04/18 08:13 PM
9

Well, then I hope you don't mind being downvoted to oblivion for posting that nonsense in this sub.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 08:12 PM
11

Who cares about her consent? What matters is that they mutilated him without his own consent.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 08:11 PM
1

I'm a lot less harsh on circumcising fathers, since they are almost always cut themselves, and I understand the desire to do to others what they have done to you. Also, I'm somewhat jealous of/angry at women for getting to keep all of their genitalia, where most men do not, which contributes to me blaming the mothers more.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 07:11 PM
0

much content feels anti-woman or anti-feminist Those two things are far from equivalent.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 07:31 PM
3

No, but she doesn't deserve any upvotes on that awful video.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 07:30 PM
2

Time to downvote that video from my dozens of google accounts.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 07:09 PM
2

Given some of the stupid stuff feminists say every day, who really can tell?
/r/MensRights07/04/18 05:39 PM
0

Give them the benefit of the doubt For future mothers, this is true, but not for women who handed their sons over to Dr. Mutilator. (It's different for Jewish women, since I understand how deeply ingrained religious practices are, but gentile women have no excuse)
/r/MensRights07/04/18 08:33 AM
6

They should rename themselves the WBSO (World Bullshit Organization)
/r/MensRights07/04/18 08:31 AM
2

u/Ex-tool3 Who wrote this response? Circumcision is wildly misrepresented in some online sources such as this subreddit. Contrary to what most believe, circumcision is not an "evil" procedure, and it is almost always done under anesthesia. I see circumcisions as nothing more than vaccinations. Regarding infant circumcision, I obviously don't believe that it should be mandated, but I think it should be encouraged by doctors and government funded campaigns. As a feminist and a woman, I believe tha…
/r/MensRights07/04/18 08:03 AM
5

Because a pin-prick and having half of the skin on your genitals amputated is exactly the same! There's no significant difference at all! /s
/r/MensRights07/04/18 08:01 AM
3

Clawedd is allegedly Australian. Maybe he's Brian Morris's sock puppet?
/r/MensRights07/04/18 08:01 AM
4

And he deleted his account. What a coward.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 04:19 AM
1

What would you suggest?
/r/MensRights06/04/18 06:50 PM
7

Preferences are preferences. Be it so. This cutting of penises is your preference; prepare the circumstraint. But I have also a preference - for women to have streamlined and easy-to-clean vulvas. My daughters shall therefore have most of their labia removed. Let us all act according to sexual preference.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 05:28 PM
2

As long as more than half of women in the country are mutilating their sons, I don't want a dime of my money going to buy them contraceptives. Sorry, but that's just the way it goes.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 05:25 PM
2

Erectile dysfunction is a medical disorder. Fertility is not.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 05:13 PM
30

Who cares what women like? It's not their penis. If women want a penis remodeled to suit their preferences, I'd recommend ordering a custom dildo.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 05:11 PM
33

They would freak out, because men are disposable to society but women are valuable. Thus, Louis CK asks a woman to watch him masturbate, she says yes, and he still gets in trouble for it. Mariah Carey gropes men and no one cares.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 12:16 AM
3

No, since u/stupidname91919 is an extremely dogmatic religious extremist who flat-out ignores anything that contradicts his very narrow interpretation of Judaism. (He doesn't even see other Jewish denominations as practicing true Judaism)
/r/MensRights05/04/18 07:53 AM
1

And, just like I thought, it's just a dumb shitposter
/r/MensRights05/04/18 07:51 AM
9

Like what?
/r/MensRights04/04/18 10:20 PM
1

Yes, but women's genitals are protected and men's are not, which means that a woman who circumcises her son is a lot less sympathetic than a circumcised man who does. Also, most circumcision consent forms are signed by mothers, not fathers.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 07:22 AM
9

As long as they are intactivists, they're fine with me
/r/MensRights04/04/18 05:03 AM
3

Thank you. I guess you're just more forgiving of circumcisers than I am. Which is fine, we both agree that it's wrong, and that's the only thing that really matters.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 12:50 AM
1

Well then they are foolish sheeple. Either way, it's not nearly as ingrained in American gentiles as it is in Jews and Muslims.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 12:34 AM
2

It's so superficial. I've been in contact with both and it has never mattered. I'm not quite sure how to interpret this. Are you saying Circumcising infants is superficial, you've been in contact with your friend and her son, and he's never cared about what she did to him or Whether a man is intact or mutilated is superficial, and you've had sex with both and it hasn't mattered
/r/MensRights04/04/18 12:21 AM
2

Except it's only a tradition for Jews, Muslims, and some African groups. For American gentiles, the vast majority of their great-grandfathers were intact.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 12:19 AM
5

I don't see anyone who circumcised a child as a good person. (Unless they are Jewish, because I understand the power of religious conformity, as a fairly religious person myself. I still don't approve of religious circumcision, though) I don't think they're all bad people, but committing an act of mutilation against your own child moves an otherwise good person into the morally ambiguous category in my opinion. There is nothing a circumcising parent can ever do to make it right with their child.…
/r/MensRights03/04/18 11:36 PM
2

Do you have any evidence he's conservative, or are you just trying to insult a political viewpoint you don't like?
/r/MensRights03/04/18 11:17 PM
6

Moms caring about how their sons' penises look is really creepy. Imagine the reaction if a man cared about how his daughter's vulva looked. Also, I'm surprised you stayed friends with her after she mutilated her son. If any friend of mine mutilated their son, they would be out of my life. (The one exception would be for Jewish friends, because I understand how hard it is to go against your religion)
/r/MensRights03/04/18 11:16 PM
6

Circumcision isn't correlated to political ideology at all. My (very liberal) parents mutilated me and my brother, and all of their friends (also very liberal) sons (that I know of, I don't know everyone's status) is similarly mutilated.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 10:16 PM
5

Because u/stupidname91919 is an extremely dogmatic Orthodox Jew who views any change to religious practice as horrific, believes children who do not follow their parents' religion are confused, and believes that Reform and Conservative Judaism are not legitimate forms of Judaism.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 04:44 PM
1

Agreed. Women are probably more to blame, in part because the fact that their genitals are protected while ours aren't is just not fair.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 04:43 PM
11

I'm glad to see the rate is so low compared to the rest of the country...and I think it used to be high there. This is a good sign.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 06:01 AM
1

They're different, but neither should be done to children. A child has no religion, and may not wish to follow their parents' religion as an adult.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 05:36 AM
28

"Circumcision isn't cutting genitals off" - it is cutting part, but not all, of the genitals off. This guy is really dumb.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 05:23 AM
27

Ya know, we're not the ones groping and slicing at infant's penises. Just sayin'...
/r/MensRights03/04/18 05:21 AM
2

It's just like the Titanic - women and children first
/r/MensRights03/04/18 05:20 AM
1

Chopping off a body part is the definition of extreme, dude.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 03:14 AM
1

you can't miss what you don't have Is not a justification to mutilate children's genitals.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 09:40 PM
1

No, because unlike MGM, FGM isn't practiced by "civilized" peoples and religions. It's a lot easier to ban a practice associated with tribal barbarism than it is a practice associated with the largest first world country and a respected religious minority. If FGM was practiced by Jews and Americans and MGM was practiced by Africans and Muslims, FGM would be legal and MGM would be banned.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 07:01 PM
6

If they can wash their hands and brush their teeth, they can wash their foreskins.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 06:59 PM
2

There's a difference between having an ethical opinion and just hating male sexuality.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 06:36 PM
1

Sad
/r/MensRights01/04/18 06:36 PM
5

That's because they didn't have the most sensitive parts of their genitals amputated at birth.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 08:43 AM
5

That's only because women get to keep all of their genitalia.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 08:43 AM
3

I've never seen a feminist care about men's perspectives one bit.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 06:58 AM
12

As long as you leave your kids intact, you can do whatever you want to your own penis.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 06:57 AM
4

Yeah, they freak out at the thought of having to buy their own birth control, but think that a massive reduction in male pleasure is a good thing.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 03:43 AM
7

Dear women, I'm sorry for being born with a Y-chromosome. I know that my genetics oppress you. Sincerely, u/MenDeserveRights
/r/MensRights01/04/18 02:32 AM
5

At least she's not going to mutilate her child. But her whole argument is still facetious, since the amount men think about sex isn't affected by if they're intact or not. If anything, intact men will think about it less, since they won't be constantly trying to feel satisfied with damaged equipment.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 02:31 AM
4

If they don't share my values, its because they are confused You're the one who is confused if you believe that your values are the only legitimate ones. I also ascribe to what I imagine you would view as a narrow definition of what constitutes a legitimate mainstream Jewish group. Let me guess, you don't see Reform or Conservative Jews as real Jews? and he did a disservice to his son If a father doesn't cut off his daughter's clitoris, has he done a disservice to her? Then you are confused How …
/r/MensRights30/03/18 11:00 PM
4

Being intact isn't a problem that needs to be fixed, it's the natural state of the human body. I will defy any such law, since I am more concerned with how I would be judged in heaven than how I would be judged by a court. I'm a fairly religious Christian, and if my religion called for me to damage my children's bodies, I would still say no. I'd rather be punished by God then inflict physical damage upon my children. This isn't a preference for me. Its the most important thing in my life. But wh…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 10:02 PM
9

But of course women deserve full custody in most cases, because men are bad REEEEEEEEEE
/r/MensRights30/03/18 05:38 PM
9

Also, an infant's foreskin shouldn't be retracted at all. Only clean what is seen. When intact, don't retract.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 05:31 PM
6

I have some advice to help you convince her Make her watch an infant circumcision video with the sound on. Make her read this Ask her if she'd ever dream of amputating part of a daughter's genitalia
/r/MensRights30/03/18 05:30 PM
5

You do realize most Russian Jews don't circumcise and haven't for generations, right? And only 40% of Swedish Jewish boys are circumcised nowadays. If it is made illegal and you don't comply with the law, you will either be fined or imprisoned, just like you would be if you cut into a little girl's genitalia. That's how the law works. Religious rights are important, but they're not a trump card that overrides everything else. You can do whatever you want to your own penis for religious reasons, …
/r/MensRights30/03/18 05:24 PM
8

Put your foot down and tell her that there's no way in hell you'll let someone take a knife to your son's genitalia.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 04:18 PM
4

Ok, then come here. My religion is no-earism.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 04:17 PM
7

You can call yourself a MRA if you support cutting up infant boys' genitals, sure, but you're not actually aligned with the goals of the movement you claim to be a part of. If your interpretation of your religion (which not all members of your religion share, btw) calls for the mutilation of infant genitalia, then I am obligated to fight you as well. If your sons are angry about what you did to them, what will you say to them?
/r/MensRights30/03/18 04:17 PM
8

You live for the fight when it's all that you've got. If you don't support men being able to decide for themselves how much of their genitalia they get to keep, you don't support men's rights. You care more about your religion than you do about men's rights.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 08:05 AM
3

If you're not an ultra-Orthodox Jew, you've already given up some Jewish practices. Why not give up the only one that actually causes bodily harm to an infant?
/r/MensRights29/03/18 10:41 PM
4

Your right to practice your religion ends where someone else's body begins. I can't tattoo my children with a crucifix in order to remind them of Jesus either.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 10:40 PM
3

So then can we at least all agree to ban non-religious male circumcision? In that case, child rights collide only with parental preferences.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 07:52 PM
3

At least I'll break the cycle and protect my son.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 05:27 PM
1

Nope. Abortion involves two bodies, only one of which is ever given the choice.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 08:00 AM
1

Vaccines are a pinprick, not an amputation of a body part. They're not natural, but they don't permanently change your body. That's the difference.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 01:00 AM
1

Vaccines don't involve surgery or removal of a body part. Name one other case where it's considered acceptable for parents to surgically remove healthy, functional, normal tissue.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 12:49 AM
2

None of your examples involve healthy, normal body parts. They all involve birth defects or abnormalities. You're comparing apples to oranges. It's a shame that your son won't be able to do what he wants with his penis.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 10:25 PM
4

I don't like to go to the doctors because they cut off half of my penis.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 07:40 PM
3

This is the only time your decision determines how much of their body they get to keep. Cutting off part of the genitalia isn't minor. The only person whose opinion on circumcision matters it the person whose penis it is. It's his penis, not yours.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 07:33 PM
1

I guess so
/r/MensRights27/03/18 05:48 PM
5

I don't think he's Jewish. He's from Canada, which makes it even stranger. Most young Canadians are intact.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 05:48 PM
3

The health benefits are minuscule at best and can all be attained in much less invasive ways. The cosmetic "benefits" are completely subjective. Some prefer cut, some prefer intact. The problem is that you don't seem to care what your son wants, you want to reconstruct his penis in a way that is pleasing to you, which is rather disturbing. They don't recommend it, which means that they don't think it's a good idea.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 05:46 PM
3

At least I'm not amputating the most sensitive parts of my children's genitalia. Here's the link
/r/MensRights27/03/18 05:09 AM
3

I'm not okay with removing an extra toe on someone's body, but I think it's a lot less problematic than amputating a normal body part. Vaccines don't remove body parts. Most younger Canadians are intact, and Canada's national medical association recommends against infant circumcision.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 04:35 AM
5

I never said removing a birthmark was okay, I think it's ethically problematic, but not nearly as bad as circumcision. Once again, there's a huge difference between vaccines and amputating part of the genitals. Where are you from?
/r/MensRights27/03/18 03:03 AM
3

Because that's what circumcision is. The removal of healthy, normal, erogenous tissue from someone who can't consent. Once again, a birthmark is a deformity, and not equivalent to a natural foreskin. There should be limits to what parents can do to their children. Most women aren't repulsed by the foreskin. There were several intact guys at my high school, and none of them had any problems with girls.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 02:20 AM
5

No, it isn't. Removing a healthy, normal part of a child's body without their consent is wrong. Is female circumcision acceptable to you? Most men in Europe, Canada, and Australia are intact, and they don't seem to have any problems with women and relationships there.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 01:25 AM
8

A sixth toe is an abnormality. A foreskin is not. Why should the cosmetic preferences of some women dictate how much of his penis he gets to keep? Because not all women prefer cut, even in America, and the vast majority of European, Canadian, and Aussie women prefer intact.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 01:12 AM
7

What other decisions involve removing part of his body? Why do you think removing a lot of sensitive, erogenous tissue would improve his sex life?
/r/MensRights27/03/18 12:46 AM
11

He only thinks it improves the sex life because some ignorant women prefer it.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 11:44 PM
6

You are correct.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 11:43 PM
8

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion on this, which is why carving your opinion into your son is problematic. Should they? No. But if was a thing men preferred and they want to be appealing to more men then that's an option for them. Exactly. It should be an option given to them when their adults capable of deciding what they want for their bodies. The same applies to circumcision. If it comes up I'll tell him, medical benefits, looks, cleanliness and to aid his sex life. And like most men …
/r/MensRights26/03/18 10:40 PM
4

My opinion is that it's unacceptable to chop of a healthy, normal, part of someone else. Cutting out men's nipples would reduce their breast cancer risk, yet we don't do it to baby boys. Ask yourself why. The medical benefits of circumcision are negligible at best, ergo you can't justify doing it to babies and children. Circumcised doesn't look better, it's no safer, a foreskin takes 5 seconds to clean in the shower. Cutting up boys to suit the cosmetic preferences of women is perverse to the ex…
/r/MensRights26/03/18 09:06 PM
3

The difference is that a vaccine doesn't remove any body parts, and has very real medical benefits. Whereas circumcision removes healthy, erogenous tissue, for health benefits that are incredibly minuscule at best. Not everything should be decided by the parents. You shouldn't be able to cut of your children's toes, labia, or earlobes for example. Why are you glad that part of your penis is missing?
/r/MensRights26/03/18 05:36 PM
7

Intentions don't matter - effects do.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 01:37 AM
4

It's not your penis, why not let the person whose penis it is decide when he's old enough? And you don't see amputation of part of the genitalia as a downside?
/r/MensRights25/03/18 11:42 PM
6

Parents shouldn't be able to cut parts of their children off for any reason.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 11:41 PM
6

That's what happens in the week or so after the circumcision.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 11:40 PM
9

It is the amputation of the foreskin. Some religions call for female genital cutting, but that doesn't mean it should be allowed. Your right to practice your religion ends where someone else's body begins. Circumcision benefits about 1 out of every 120 men who have it done. That's not a justification.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 07:08 PM
1

I was born a premie too. The last thing people should think about doing to a defenseless baby is mutilating their genitals. I guess I'm lucky in that I've never had any tonsil or appendix problems. The worst that could happen with my wisdom teeth is that they could cause me some mouth pain every now and then, so I decided to leave them in there. Like I said, I don't trust my parents judgement about removing body parts.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 07:08 PM
6

As am I. If you don't think men deserve bodily integrity, you don't really support men's rights.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 07:06 PM
8

Two things. Learn how to spell "foreskin" You've admitted on here that the health benefits are minuscule at best. Why did you do it?
/r/MensRights25/03/18 05:28 PM
10

Because nothing is more hygienic than an open wound in a diaper /s
/r/MensRights25/03/18 05:26 PM
10

It is the amputation of healthy, functional tissue from a nonconsenting minor. It's wrong.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 05:26 PM
2

Are you Greek-American?
/r/MensRights25/03/18 05:24 PM
2

Because you can't be pro-MGM and pro-men's rights.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 05:20 PM
5

Nothing wrong with being pro-circumcision as long as you recognize that the child you are circumcising may not grow up to be pro-circumcision, and thus, should be able to decide for himself if he wants to have half of the skin on his penis cut off or not.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 05:20 PM
7

The benefits are fairly minimal, and the downsides are large, so why not let the person with the penis make the decision?
/r/MensRights25/03/18 05:17 PM
6

Why did you cut off half of your son's penis?
/r/MensRights25/03/18 05:12 PM
5

Just look at the foreskin restoration sub for men who are upset about it. What other body parts are parents allowed to remove without a legitimate reason?
/r/MensRights25/03/18 05:09 PM
52

That's fine, as long as you recognize that a lot of people this is done to vehemently dislike it, and don't do it to your kids. It's their penis, let them make their own choice.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 07:17 AM
2

Are you too stupid to know how to wash yourself?
/r/MensRights25/03/18 04:52 AM
3

Yes, I want men to have the same protection women do from non-consensual genital cutting.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 04:51 AM
3

I'm not having my wisdom teeth extracted. 20 years ago, doctors told my parents that it would be best to have half of my penis chopped off, and I was powerless to resist it. A couple weeks ago, doctors told my parents and I that it would be best to have my wisdom teeth ripped out, but this time, I was able to say no. Circumcision has made me very suspicious of any medical recommendation to remove a body part, since the removal of the foreskin was so unnecessary.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 04:50 AM
2

It's cleaner to rip off your fingernails, yet we don't do that to babies.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 04:48 AM
1

Christianity does not require or even recommend circumcision.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 06:17 AM
2

Did she say she'd leave her own sons intact as well? My only sibling doesn't want to have children, which make this easy for me - no siblings to convince. I'll obviously leave any sons of mine intact. Hopefully by the time my children have children (probably will be the 2050s), male circumcision will be either so uncommon or outright banned in America, but if need be, I will talk to me children to spare my grandchildren.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 05:32 AM
3

Follow the money. American doctors are the only ones who ever seem to find benefits. They're also the only ones who can make $400 in 15 minutes by performing them. Hmmm.....
/r/MensRights24/03/18 03:43 AM
5

Less than 1% of intact boys ever have foreskin problems. Please leave your sons intact.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 03:41 AM
3

It's mutilation if it's the removal of healthy tissue from a nonconsenting person.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 03:41 AM
2

No form of FGM is analogous to female castration - hysterectomy is, and no tribe performs that
/r/MensRights24/03/18 03:40 AM
3

1 out of every 120 men will have a foreskin problem in their lifetime. Such a minuscule benefit doesn't come remotely close to justifying the removal of at least half of the male erogenous tissue.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 03:40 AM
3

I'm glad that your sister was supportive of you. Have you talked to her about leaving her sons intact yet?
/r/MensRights24/03/18 03:38 AM
2

Kimmel gets a lot of things wrong, but he left his son intact despite being Jewish, and thus, I see him as worthy of respect, although I disagree with him on pretty much everything else.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 07:31 AM
12

Doesn't necessarily mean the kid shouldn't have been born, just that some parents should have their children taken away from them by CPS.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 01:29 AM
3

What was the medical condition?
/r/MensRights22/03/18 08:43 PM
1

I don't hate my parents for doing it, because I know it wasn't malicious. But still, I've been scarred for life by their shitty judgement, so while I don't hate them, I don't trust them.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 04:09 PM
3

Some people thought it was the sockpuppet of a pro-mutilation troll.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 04:08 PM
4

No, I hope it's real, and I hope that she takes him to a doctor, and the doctor refuses to cut the boy and tells the mother off in the strongest possible terms, and maybe even reports her to CPS.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 06:15 AM
5

Is that the Dutch guy who claims he had to get circumcised as an adult because smegma got into his urethra?
/r/MensRights22/03/18 05:50 AM
2

He should call CPS and get away from his crazy mother ASAP. If I wasn't a broke college student, I'd offer to pay for a lawyer for him.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 05:50 AM
7

You can't diagnose phimosis in a baby. The doctors lied to sell your parents a $400 dollar operation.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 05:49 AM
34

The "women prefer it" justifications just make me want to avoid sex and women all together. If you won't sleep with a man unless he chops off part of his dick, you don't deserve a man.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 04:03 AM
8

I wish this was true for all ages.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 03:53 AM
5

Hopefully.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 03:53 AM
9

They deserve all of the heartbreak and regret they're feeling. Everyone who circumcised their son does. Feeling guilty isn't nearly as painful as having your genitals torn and sliced apart. I truly feel sorry for your friend, though. Hopefully he's in a better place now.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 03:46 AM
5

Because it involves the amputation of healthy tissue from a nonconsenting minor. If an adult wants to get circumcised, that's fine, but it should be up to every man to decide for himself if he wants half of the skin on his penis chopped off.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 03:42 AM
13

And the difference there is that the hymen is eventually supposed to break, unlike the foreskin. I saw that comment, it was especially awful.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 03:11 AM
15

You may like being circumcised, but they may not. It's their penis, let them decide if they want to get it chopped up.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 01:52 AM
17

I hope that a doctor would at least consider refraining from amputating tissue from a patient who clearly doesn't want or need it, but the love of money is the root of all evil.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 01:51 AM
17

They all cry "me too" when some man grabs their butt, yet they're okay with grabbing a baby's dick and chopping it up for their skin. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 12:08 AM
5

I linked to another story about that in this thread
/r/MensRights22/03/18 12:06 AM
3

Are you sure? It sounds a lot like the justifications I've heard by people who actually mutilated their boys
/r/MensRights21/03/18 11:37 PM
42

Assuming she's actually a mother and not a troll (which seems possible, given the account has no other contributions), I agree
/r/MensRights21/03/18 08:33 PM
1

Like when my mother had half of my dick chopped off?
/r/MensRights21/03/18 05:26 PM
18

Sort of like how most American boys get their genitals scarred for life by their mothers.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 07:18 AM
2

Pretty much all circumcisions remove most pleasure.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 08:08 PM
3

That describes most circumcisions.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 07:54 AM
7

I'm American, as are many intactivists. I don't hate my parents, but I deeply resent that they did this to me.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 09:24 PM
5

It's because cutting off a healthy part off of a child absent medical need is wrong.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 08:50 PM
3

What's your culture?
/r/MensRights18/03/18 08:49 PM
10

It's not the family's penis or the culture's penis. The penis belongs to the man it is attached to, and no one else has the right to make decisions about it.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 08:48 PM
6

It's fine if you're happy with your own penis, as long as you let your sons decide for themselves if they want to have part of their penises cut off when they're adults.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 08:47 PM
11

Just like circumcision has a direct and negative impact on your sexual ability.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 08:46 PM
12

If part of your penis was cut off, you by definition don't have a whole penis. Are you confused about the meaning of words? PM me your mailing address, so I can send you a dictionary.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 08:45 PM
8

See, this is an example of an incredibly articulate and well thought out argument! /s
/r/MensRights18/03/18 08:43 PM
15

We don't need circumcision It doesn't do a thing Except mutilate the genitals The devil's got his ways Jason Paige, lead singer of the Pokemon theme song
/r/MensRights18/03/18 08:43 PM
2

Wrong. If you support denying men bodily autonomy, you don't really support men's rights. You support allowing parental beliefs and preference to override individual rights.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 06:17 AM
2

If you don't support men having the ability to decide what happens to their own bodies, you don't truly support men's rights. I'm sorry, but that's just the way it goes.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 03:24 AM
2

If you don't think men should be able to decide what happens to their own bodies, you don't really care about men's rights.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 03:05 AM
2

You're the pro-male genital cutting guy, right?
/r/MensRights18/03/18 01:20 AM
1

It was common in the US because Dr. Kellogg (inventor of corn flakes) thought it would stop boys from masturbating. There was never any religious rational behind the circumcision of American gentiles.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 01:18 AM
1

Christians aren't required to get circumcised anymore than they (we) are required to keep kosher or not work on Saturdays.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 01:16 AM
3

Here's an essay about it
/r/MensRights17/03/18 07:56 PM
5

You can practice your religion on yourself all you want. If I wanted to stick nails through my hands as a show of solidarity with Jesus on the cross, I could do that. I never would, but it would be perfectly acceptable for me to do that. If I wanted to stick nails through the hands of my children to make them empathize with the suffering of Jesus, that would not be okay.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 07:49 PM
5

Your religious freedom ends where someone else's body begins.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 07:47 PM
3

Yes, I do. Christians aren't supposed to circumcise their sons anyway. As for Jews, most Jews nowadays ignore a lot of Jewish commandments, such as those about not working on the Sabbath and not eating pork. If they can do away with those, they can do away with this one too.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 07:47 PM
7

Agreed. I was arguing with some new mothers on Twitter the other day, and they kept responding with nonsense about how "I get to make every choice for him until he's grown up" and that "it's my kid". Some people truly are beyond all help.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 07:45 PM
6

You're a wonderful father.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 07:44 PM
43

Also, who cares what women prefer? The penis is a part of a man's body that exists for his pleasure, not a living dildo that should be chopped up to please a shallow woman...
/r/MensRights17/03/18 08:04 AM
6

I'm circumcised and unhappy about it, so your contention that I'm just mad because a woman rejected me for being intact is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 08:03 AM
3

I'm not gay, if that's what you're asking. I'm attracted to women, but I've decided that dating just isn't worth it. The lack of compassion most women have towards men, such as my mother when she paid a doctor to chop up my penis, means that while I don't hate them, I'm better off keeping my distance.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 05:11 PM
1

It's a difficult question, because it's a debt that can never truly be repaid, due to how atrocious it is.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 08:18 AM
2

Fair point.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 08:18 AM
2

Please read this Some men, believe it or not, are unhappy that part of their penis was cut off.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 06:54 AM
6

Then how do you explain the Jewish and Muslim men who don't like being circumcised?
/r/MensRights16/03/18 06:48 AM
6

Your right to practice your religion ends where someone else's body begins. Don't believe me? Then come here, my religion tells me I have to cut off your ear.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 06:47 AM
13

And thankfully, my own sons will be protected where I was not.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 05:02 AM
2

Any woman who circumcised her sons should have to pay them reparations.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 05:01 AM
16

It's removal of healthy, functional, tissue without the consent of the patient. That's wrong. If a parent wanted to trim their daughter's labia, would you be okay with that? Banning circumcision is the most important Men's Rights cause, because circumcision is a violent violation and mutilation of men when they are at their most vulnerable. Which men's issues do you think trump this?
/r/MensRights16/03/18 03:58 AM
13

So you don't think the genital mutilation of men is a problem?
/r/MensRights16/03/18 03:10 AM
5

Exactly. Orthodox Jews will probably never accept not circumcising, but if we could get them to go back to the original form that was just the tip of the foreskin, that would be better than the current form.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 03:10 AM
2

Shit like this is why I don't date women.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 02:28 AM
4

The problem is that the intended goal is never the goal of the victim, I mean patient.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 02:17 PM
4

Although I am very proud to be America, our hypocritical double standards on cutting infant genitalia brings me great shame.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 05:36 PM
5

The complication rates are 100%.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 05:36 PM
4

I hope any parent who had their son undergo this feels ashamed, horribly guilty, and completely inadequate as a parent until the end of forever.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 05:35 PM
6

I'm restoring. If any woman ever told me to get cut (I don't plan on telling anyone once the restoration is complete, I'll just try to pass as intact), I'd tell her: "Cut off your clitoris for me and then I'll cut off my foreskin for you."
/r/MensRights14/03/18 05:35 PM
15

Thank you for protecting your sons.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 06:55 AM
11

The world is a crazy, fucked-up place, and I have a reminder of that every time I go to pee.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 06:55 AM
17

The worst part is the part at the end where they say that parents shouldn't be shamed if they choose to genitally mutilate their sons.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 06:25 AM
2

Which is why I think he doesn't regret it, I think he's just being willfully obtuse.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 07:07 PM
2

What makes you think the guy regrets it? He seems awfully defensive and dismissive...
/r/MensRights11/03/18 06:04 PM
6

And the worst thing is that the dude defends the gendered double standard on genital cutting like it was the most normal thing ever.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 09:50 AM
5

A lot of people choose to let their pride get in the way of honest circumcision discussion.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 06:05 PM
4

Regrettably, new fathers sometimes attempt to validate/justify their own circumcisions by having their sons cut, too. This is a psychologically weak path. I will instead protect my sons from circumcision.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 06:05 PM
6

I hope that Doctor spends the rest of its life in jail.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 01:50 AM
1

Cutting off part of your child's genitals isn't a decision parents should be able to make.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 06:05 PM
3

WTF is a "gentle circumcision" Is that like a gentle decapitation or a gentle castration?
/r/MensRights06/03/18 06:03 PM
2

Reminds me of how a greedy, bloodthirsty doctor tricked my well-intentioned but gullible parents into cutting off part of mine.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:55 PM
6

All circumcised men have a scar where they cut the foreskin away.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 12:19 AM
2

Your right to raise your children as you please has limits. If I decided that I didn't like my children having 10 toes and only wanted them to have 9, I couldn't cut off a toe, even thought that would be less harmful than cutting off the foreskin.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 08:53 PM
6

How is a scar on your dick "better-looking"?
/r/MensRights04/03/18 04:56 PM
2

Thank you
/r/MensRights04/03/18 01:00 AM
7

Yeah, I respect religion deeply as a person of faith myself, but I also respect that I don't have the right to carve my religion into my children's bodies. Tattooing a cross onto an infant's back is much less harmful than circumcision, because it removes no tissue, yet it is still illegal.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 09:29 PM
12

Children need protection from harmful cultural practices, Muslims don't need to come into Europe.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 08:43 PM
6

But what about all of the men who were circumcised without a religious reason? Can the author of this shitty article at least admit that was wrong?
/r/MensRights03/03/18 08:40 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights02/03/18 06:24 PM
1

Just some examples. Why?
/r/MensRights01/03/18 07:22 AM
2

https://carm.org/contradictions-quran
/r/MensRights01/03/18 04:25 AM
2

It's equally low amongst Britons, but the number is inflated by Islamic migrants and their children.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 02:36 AM
4

For all living men, yes, but for newborns in 2017 no.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 10:07 PM
4

It doesn't command circumcisions, but the Koran has a lot of other internal contradictions.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 10:07 PM
3

I think so. Even if it were free, I'd never to it to my child. Not even if I was paid to do it.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 10:06 PM
3

The Koran is fairly self-contradictory.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 06:28 PM
33

So is clitorectomy.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 06:39 AM
2

Kind of like how my mom paid a doctor to forcibly touch and cut at my genitals, and I have no legal recourse against either one of them.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 05:50 PM
25

Your right to your religion ends where someone else's body begins.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 08:57 AM
5

Since it was not medically necessary, I'm mad that it was done without waiting to see if I wanted it done.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 12:04 AM
7

I'm upset with the procedure being done to children, regardless of if it is religious or secular. I support the Icelandic ban, because if my country had had a ban when I was born, it wouldn't have happened to me. I think it's a flawed assumption to assume children will want to follow the religion of their parents as an adult. I don't. My parents are vaguely Catholic, and I'm a fairly religious Protestant. That said, if my faith required me to make permanent changes to my children's bodies, I wou…
/r/MensRights26/02/18 10:33 PM
7

It may be halachic to do it to infants, but the religious beliefs of the parents cannot be allowed to override the right of the man whose penis it is to decide for himself if he wants to be circumcised. Yes, I do know that, given I'm a non-Jewish American.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 09:53 PM
2

I'd never go to a brit milah. And I have many Jewish friends.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 06:36 PM
8

Well I didn't want it done, but since my parents did it, there's not much I can do about it. Whereas if you hadn't been cut and you wanted to be, you always could get it done.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 06:35 PM
3

Lots of other groups have, and it's not like people look at each other's penises a lot. Also, I'm not Jewish. So I was circumcised for no real reason.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 06:12 PM
5

Cutting off part of my genitalia keeps me safe how? And lots of other groups have managed to maintain their identity without genital cutting. And there's no evidence that circumcision slows Jewish intermarriage or secularization.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 04:25 PM
3

What makes you think that it shouldn't be there?
/r/MensRights26/02/18 06:42 AM
9

One person's problem doesn't justify the amputation of most or all foreskins. My aunt almost died from appendicitis, but that doesn't mean we remove appendices routinely.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 05:32 AM
6

How is getting half the skin on your dick chopped off a blessing?
/r/MensRights26/02/18 05:31 AM
4

Well I've had massive issues with mine. Your son could feel the way you do about it, or he could feel the way I do about it. Do you really want to take that risk?
/r/MensRights26/02/18 12:42 AM
5

I didn't want somebody else's identity carved into my genitals.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 12:41 AM
4

you can grieve your loss and move on, or you can kill yourself There's a third option - restoration, which is what I'm doing, mostly so that I can pass as intact. For me it's not even about pleasure/sensation, I don't really want to have sex, in part because the last time someone else touched my genitals, it was with a knife to cut at them. But it will be nice to have my penis look near-intact.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 12:28 AM
10

That's as stupid as believing that your eyelid is trying to choke your eyeball.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 12:05 AM
4

Because pleasing a group that hasn't even been in the country for a century is more important then protecting helpless babies. /s
/r/MensRights26/02/18 12:04 AM
7

There are less than 100 Jews in Iceland and no synagogues in the country. Have the rabbis involved ever even been to Iceland?
/r/MensRights03/02/18 12:52 AM
1

I agree that it's a preference, and that's why I think the decision should be made by the man whose penis it is.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 01:52 AM
2

"Give me the beat, boys and free my soul" "Saturdays are for the boys" "I still dream of the simple life, boy meets girl makes her his wife" Does she not realize the word "boy" is used the same way?
/r/MensRights21/01/18 03:31 AM
13

I used to edit Wikipedia. Used to.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 06:27 PM
3

Finally you cite Dr. Van Howe. At least he's an actual medical doctor, unlike Brian Morris (university PhD professor, not MD doctor), Vernon Quaintance (convicted pedophile), and Jake Waskett (no doctorate) If it reduced pleasure to a biologically significant degree, you would expect a reduction in libido or sexual frequency. As you get older, you lose hearing sensitivity, yet old people don't listen to music less than young people. The issue is that it is a cosmetic surgery that removes healthy…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:29 AM
1

The fact that you are using "Lol" (A casual, texting acronym) in a serious discussion of medical ethics indicates you are a troll who does not take this discussion seriously.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:26 AM
1

If there's a tooth problem, they absolutely do it with as much consent as they need for circumcision. If there is a legitimate foreskin problem (which there almost never is), then circumcision can be performed without consent of the child. So if a child was in an accident or has a birth defect, they shouldn't have any avenue to correct it? Or do you think it can be done based on consent of the parent along with the judgement of a qualified medical profession (same conditions as circumcision). Th…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:24 AM
10

It's not about attacking religion, it's about defending bodily integrity. It's illegal to cut a girl, why should it be legal to cut a boy?
/r/MensRights16/01/18 01:26 AM
10

Religious rights override the right to bodily autonomy in your opinion? Fine. Come here, my religion is no-earism!
/r/MensRights16/01/18 12:32 AM
11

Your right to practice your religion ends where someone else's body begins.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 12:08 AM
8

If a hospital did that to any son of mine against my wishes, I would sue them so fast they wouldn't know what hit them.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 09:02 PM
13

You had no choice, but you can protect your sons and make sure they get to decide for themselves if they want to be circumcised when they are adults. I'm in the same boat (except I was born in America, not an Islamic country)
/r/MensRights15/01/18 09:01 PM
4

The glans of the circumcised penis is less sensitive to fine touch than the glans of the uncircumcised penis. The transitional region from the external to the internal prepuce is the most sensitive region of the uncircumcised penis and more sensitive than the most sensitive region of the circumcised penis. Circumcision ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 02:00 AM
3

Yes, genitals change between infancy and adulthood, which is all the more reason not to cut off part of an infant's genitals. Adult circumcision is better, because the foreskin is not fused to the glans like it is in infants, and adults can be given proper pain relief. NORM doesn't recommend surgical foreskin restoration. They do recommend manual foreskin restoration, which consists of stretching the remaining skin to cause mitosis to grow more tissue. Circumcision ablates the most sensitive par…
/r/MensRights15/01/18 01:59 AM
1

I have no problem with consensual tooth pulling, it would be wrong to do to infants. I have no problem with consensual ear piercing, I think it's wrong to do to infants, but it's a lot less problematic than circumcision, so I don't invest effort into it. I don't think cosmetic surgery should be performed on children. I don't approve of cutting a child's toe webbing, but it effects exponentially fewer people than male genital mutilation, so I don't invest effort into it.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 01:55 AM
1

Cosmetic surgeries are fine if consented to by the patient. Surgical cutting of skin en route to a diseased tissue is an unfortunate necessity, as otherwise the diseased tissue could not be removed. Ear piercing is rarely done in infants in America - I think it's mostly a Latin American thing. I don't approve of it but it's a lot less harmful than circumcision. My teeth were not pulled for braces, nor were the teeth of anyone I know other than my parents, which is why I said it hasn't been done …
/r/MensRights14/01/18 09:15 PM
3

So is the loss of foreskin...
/r/MensRights14/01/18 09:11 PM
3

They both remove the foreskin. Also, men who have restored their foreskins have reported greatly increased sensitivity.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 09:11 PM
3

Imagine unironically believing you can't leave the hospital without cutting part of your baby off.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 09:10 PM
2

It's horrifying. Amputating part of someone else's body just because you felt like it.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 09:09 PM
9

The mother chose to get pregnant, knowing there was a possibility of surgical scarring from delivery. Those scars do not remove any tissue. So her response is to remove the best part of her son's penis as "revenge"? Disgusting.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 11:51 PM
4

Men who have experience both realize the importance of the foreskin. Most circumcised men are capable of sex and ejaculation, but if they had been left intact, it would have been a more enjoyable experience for both them and their partner.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 11:12 PM
5

Colorblind people usually get by just fine in the world (i.e. with things like driving, reading, sports), but that's not a justification for making all people colorblind.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 11:11 PM
2

Circumcision is the surgical removal of healthy, functional tissue. That's indisputable. Hair is not living tissue, and it grows back. Ear piercing is a consensual body ornamentation that pokes a hole that can usually close up if the earrings are left out for long enough. It's not remotely comparable to ripping and slicing a newborn's genitalia. Trimming of toe webbing and benign moles is correction of a birth defect, whereas foreskin is clearly not a birth defect. Pulling of teeth for braces ha…
/r/MensRights13/01/18 11:09 PM
2

Most cases of phimosis can be treated without circumcision This entire post that you commented on is about routine infant circumcision, not phimosis or adult circumcision, though
/r/MensRights13/01/18 09:54 AM
2

The vast majority of women who have had both intact and cut prefer intact. Even if women did prefer it, I wouldn't be willing to chop off part of my dick to please them. I'm furious that it was done to me without consent.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 09:32 AM
3

Fine: Destruction of healthy, functional tissue is physical harm
/r/MensRights13/01/18 08:15 AM
2

I was forcibly circumcised at birth...
/r/MensRights13/01/18 08:15 AM
1

Amputation of healthy, functional tissue is physical harm.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 06:19 AM
6

Also, it's awful that she's portraying genital mutilation as fun for the siblings of the victim
/r/MensRights13/01/18 01:31 AM
1

Thank you
/r/MensRights13/01/18 01:29 AM
1

The problem with that is that most girls where I live choose to get it done, and it's seen as a good thing here, whereas most intact boys never want to get cut.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 01:29 AM
2

It's still better than chopping off your foreskin...
/r/MensRights12/01/18 10:28 PM
3

No, you stretch your foreskin if you have phimosis so you can keep it...
/r/MensRights12/01/18 09:47 PM
1

He's a molester/sexual harasser, not a rapist. There's a distinction. What he did was bad, yes, and he deserved punishment, but at the same time he shouldn't be locked in prison for life and have his life destroyed. He lost his shot at the Olympics and got kicked out of school. That's punishment enough.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 09:46 PM
4

For someone who left her sons intact, she sure seems defensive of male genital cutting...
/r/MensRights12/01/18 09:32 PM
1

Canadian doctors are paid by the hour?
/r/MensRights12/01/18 09:31 PM
2

I posted the argument I was refuting in the OP But these are all good, thank you Also, for "but hygiene" - do you brush your teeth or pull them out? is also good
/r/MensRights12/01/18 09:31 PM
4

I'll try this next time - thanks!
/r/MensRights12/01/18 06:26 PM
2

He probably had phimosis, which can be treated in a much less invasive way. But circumcising him makes the doctors more money, so...
/r/MensRights12/01/18 06:26 PM
2

Agreed
/r/MensRights12/01/18 06:25 PM
3

Thanks - I'll try these next time someone makes that argument
/r/MensRights12/01/18 06:25 PM
5

Thanks - this is a good point, but the problem with it is that pretty much everyone who regurgitates the statement I quoted in OP doesn't believe it's unethical, even though it clearly is.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 07:38 AM
3

Good point - thanks! If they are Jewish, should I bring up that technically speaking, the traditional way to circumcise only removes the tip of the foreskin and not all of it. Even if I can't talk Jewish friends out of circumcising entirely, do you think it would be worth trying to talk them into the less harmful kind?
/r/MensRights12/01/18 07:37 AM
2

Good point - thanks!
/r/MensRights12/01/18 07:36 AM
34

The author is clearly ignorant about the history of circumcision. Even the Rambam admitted that it was about diminishing male sexuality.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 03:09 AM
17

Organ theft at its finest.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 03:08 AM
38

Foreskin anti-wrinkle skin cream: Because helping old ladies look younger matters more than the human rights of men and boys! /s
/r/MensRights12/01/18 03:08 AM
3

It is
/r/MensRights11/01/18 08:38 PM
3

The foreskin is fused to the glans until puberty - no need to try to retract your child's or wash under it - once it has separated, he can wash under it by just retracting it in the shower and rinsing it with water.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 08:26 PM
3

No medical association recommends it. Out of every 120 boys circumcised, only one will ever benefit from it medically. That's a terrible benefit for the cost of half your penile skin and nerves.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 07:04 PM
2

I loved the part of that episode about Mr Mackey (the school counselor) and drugs. The circumcision plot-line was horrific, though.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:30 PM
3

Because it's a way for them to make $300 in 30 minutes
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:27 PM
3

It's fine if you're happy with your dick, but don't assume that any sons you have will be if you do it to them.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:27 PM
1

The ACLU has also opposed allowing people to mistreat others because of their religion (i.e. Christians refusing to bake gay wedding cakes) It's astounding that they can't see how similar this is. In both cases, one person thinks their religion justifies mistreating someone else.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 06:34 PM
9

And since every other western medical association recommends against it, it's not a good idea to do it.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 11:37 PM
1

Imagine not being aware of condoms.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 06:30 PM
4

The foreskin is highly sensitive, and contains mucosa and muscle as well. Only 15% of FGM removes the entire thing
/r/MensRights08/01/18 06:56 AM
5

It's fine if you're perfectly okay with your penis being circumcised. What's not fine is doing it to children. His penis, his choice.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 06:55 AM
5

Foreskin infections are beyond rare - toe infections (fungus) is far more common, yet we don't amputate toes in order to prevent that...
/r/MensRights08/01/18 06:54 AM
11

That's Jake Waskett
/r/MensRights08/01/18 06:17 AM
6

Imagine unironically believing that it was okay to mutilate infants in order to allow old people to avoid coming to terms with their own age.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 06:41 PM
7

It doesn't matter if parents mean well by circumcising their sons. What matters is that it's an abusive practice that removes healthy, functional, tissue for benefits that are either nonexistent or incredibly marginal.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 06:38 PM
7

They loose between 30-80% of their sensitivity and are more likely to have ED and some other problems.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 06:37 PM
5

Agreed. If you think it's okay to cut off half of the skin on an infant's genitalia because you prefer the appearance, you are deeply morally bankrupt.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 06:36 PM
4

That's what they do, but it does regenerate your original, fully functional foreskin. It will probably be perfect or very close too. Certainly much better than restoration, which is much better than remaining cut.
/r/MGTOW07/01/18 06:28 AM
13

Tell her from your personal experience about how important your foreskin is an how much you enjoy having it. Thank you for trying to save a baby from becoming a victim of this brutal assault.
/r/MGTOW07/01/18 06:14 AM
6

look into r/foregen - they're making progress at regenerating a fully natural and functional foreskin - they may be ready in 3-5 years
/r/MGTOW07/01/18 06:13 AM
12

FGM is defended in countries that practice it for health reasons. See here for shockingly similar justifications of it It prevents unpleasant odours which result from foul secretions beneath the prepuce. It reduces the incidence of urinary tract infections It reduces the incidence of infections of the reproductive system. Male circumcision was initiated as a way to cripple males sexually, it became ingrained, and then was given imagined medical justifications. Genital cutting is wrong, no matter…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 06:12 AM
5

I don't think so
/r/MensRights07/01/18 01:58 AM
4

Just point out to them that an intact penis is easier to clean - just wipe off the outside like a finger. Circumcision requires a ton of aftercare and cleaning of the wound.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 01:22 AM
1

I don't have enough money to buy a bitcoin
/r/MensRights06/01/18 01:36 AM
22

Any adult man or woman who wants part of their genitalia amputated should be allowed to have it done, since it's their body. No infant or child, boy or girl, should have part of their genitalia amputated by their parents, because their body doesn't belong to their parents.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 03:27 AM
5

Virtually no intact men actually need to have it done later, though.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 11:37 PM
14

Imagine unironically believing that chopping up someone else's genitalia is a parental right
/r/MensRights04/01/18 06:22 AM
3

Wonder if I could actually invest wisely and turn ~$1k into ~12k by 2020
/r/MensRights02/01/18 07:21 AM
16

This is terrific. I just hope that despite being a college student who will have a lot of loans, I'm able to get the money to go to Italy for the procedure
/r/MensRights01/01/18 09:19 PM
2

Within reason. If a parent decides trimming their daughter's labia is best for her, they're not allowed to. Who are my parents to amputate a healthy part of my body without my consent? Your religious rights end where someone else's body begins.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 09:51 PM
8

It removes the most sensitive parts of the penis. Even if that wasn't true, it's not medically necessary, and thus, shouldn't be chosen by parents.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 09:05 PM
6

"They have smaller populations" - yes, that's why I said rates (i.e. what % of men get this condition) and not numbers (i.e. what number of men get this condition) An equal or smaller percent of their men get the conditions circumcision allegedly prevents. I'm not denying that my parents thought they were doing the right thing, and I don't think they did it to hurt me, but that doesn't mean it's right to circumcise infants. When you know better, do better.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 08:57 PM
1

The problem with your viewpoint is that if the man whose penis it is wishes he hadn't been circumcised, there's really nothing he can do about it. Why should anyone else get to decide how much of my genitalia I keep?
/r/MensRights31/12/17 08:29 PM
1

Here are some good songs about men who realize the value of independence. There is no worshipping women or giving it all away, these songs value male independence and happiness. (Though these artists have made a lot of "blue pill" music in addition to these) Bon Jovi - Breakout (A song about how he's better off on his own, without his manipulative girlfriend) Michael Bolton - Start Breaking My Heart (a man telling his ex that she was wrong when she said he'd miss her) Layzie Bone - Can't Come Ba…
/r/MensRights31/12/17 08:03 PM
3

Imagine if someone said "I am on the redline with all whites at 12:12 AM and I have never felt safer" Imagine the reaction they would get. Now compare that to the 124 (mostly positive) reactions to this on FB. This is why we need the MRM
/r/MensRights31/12/17 07:52 PM
16

But of course there's an anti-women rape culture! I read it on tumblr, so it must be true! That's why I dyed my hair pink! /s
/r/MensRights31/12/17 07:49 PM
1

Parents can't consent for any other cosmetic, non-medical procedures, so it's time to treat circumcision equally, just like any other cosmetic procedure, and let only the person whose penis it is decide.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 05:54 PM
1

I don't regret it, because I didn't choose to have it done. I'm angry about it.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 05:52 PM
12

If male circumcision has health benefits (usually claimed to be reduction of STDs, UTIs, and penile cancer), then why does (mostly intact) Europe have equal or lower rates of those conditions as (mostly cut) America? And it should be a personal decision. It's wrong for someone else to decide how much of your genitalia you get to keep.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 05:26 PM
1

Thanks - It's not actually my article, the title of the article is just "My Response..."
/r/MensRights31/12/17 08:45 AM
1

How do you keep the thumbnail from showing an image?
/r/MensRights31/12/17 08:20 AM
2

A lot of doctors want a quick, easy buck, regardless of the damage they do.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 07:37 AM
4

I'm beginning to think that feminism is just another type of insane troll logic They honestly believe Man rubs woman's but without her consent, causes no physical pain or damage = horrible violation of her body Doctor straps baby to board and amputates the most sensitive part of his penis = normal medical procedure mean need to stop complaining about so they can focus on something (Female cutting) that doesn't even happen in this country almost ever. Do they not see how hypocritical and callous …
/r/MensRights31/12/17 06:50 AM
11

One day our descendants will look back on circumcision with the same horror and disgust that we do with castration.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 06:48 AM
3

It's an intactivist group, not a pro-cutting one
/r/MensRights29/12/17 09:25 PM
3

I had my foreskin forcibly amputated as an infant, and I don't think "circumcision" is a good word for it - it masks the true nature of the procedure. Mutilation is much more accurate, but being the victim of it doesn't make you "less of a man" any more than being the victim of any other assault or crime.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 05:29 PM
1

When feminists stop saying that men need to be trained not to rape, I will speak of feminists with less hostility. When feminists stop cutting off healthy parts of their son's genitalia, I will speak of feminists with less hostility. When feminists stop claiming that men's problems are all our fault, I will speak of feminists with less hostility.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 08:08 AM
1

There were only two candidates with any chance of winning, and Clinton's support for feminism and circumcision offended me far more than any of Trump's inflammatory comments about women or minorities.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 10:18 PM
1

Let's hope this makes Sarsour into a persona non grata, Weinstein-style.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:53 PM
2

At least Trump didn't promote male circumcision and say "women are the primary victims of war because they loose their male relatives" A man voting for Hillary would be like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:52 PM
4

Good to finally see false accusers being brought to justice
/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:20 AM
1

GOP isn't perfect, but it's better than the heavily feministic Democrats. For Men's Rights supporters, I see it as the lesser of two evils
/r/MensRights17/12/17 10:34 PM
7

If a woman says that, I'd just respond with "any penis is cleaner than all the folds of your vagina" I really have no tolerance for women who force their sons to get circumcised because of their own preferences. Want to cut off someone's genital skin? Cut off your own.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 06:33 AM
3

I've never liked doctors/medicine, and disagree with my parents on most things, though I do get along with them, so I guess that makes it easier for me to accept that I was ritually abused than some other guys.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 06:31 AM
8

But it's objectively false to claim that something isn't missing. The foreskin, which is part of the penis, is missing.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 06:20 AM
9

It's a good name. I was circumcised in infancy, I'm not happy about it, and I recognize that my penis isn't intact, that something is missing.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 08:37 PM
1

I'm a Christian, and there are lots of Jews who wish to ban the practice as well.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 08:11 PM
2

If you don't want to be circumcised, but your parents did it to you as an infant, it's too late. Circumcision should only be done to adults who have given informed consent.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 04:47 AM
1

Society is definitely fucked, given that most Americans are more disturbed by Female Circumcision than Male Genital Mutilation, despite the fact that the former almost never happens here, yet the latter is an everyday occurrence.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 04:45 AM
20

FGM shouldn't be punished more harshly if MGM isn't punished at all. That's girls being prioritized over boys yet again. FGM should stay 5 years. When boys are protected, it's worth considering giving girls even more protection.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 11:33 PM
35

Do they not realize how hypocritical they sound, or do they just not care?
/r/MensRights10/12/17 11:25 PM
14

Taking any kind of interest in your child's penis is creepy, if you ask me.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 12:24 AM
5

Fair point. I don't see parents who circumcised their children as irredeemable monsters, but I don't think they should have a safe place to hide from what they've done.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 05:29 PM
3

Lots of respect for Terry Crews as an person and actor
/r/MensRights04/12/17 07:40 AM
3

Why should parents who mutilated their children get to enjoy "quality time" with their victims, I mean children?
/r/MensRights04/12/17 07:38 AM
4

If they made the right choice and didn't mutilate their children, it will be a very easy conversation. "We didn't cut part of you off". If they mutilated their children, they deserve to have their "quality time" disrupted
/r/MensRights04/12/17 01:56 AM
5

They should publish these articles next: "5 Reasons Parents Do And Don't Cut Their Children's Toes Off In 2017" "5 Reasons Parents Do And Don't Cut Their Daughters' Clitorises Off In 2017" "5 Reasons Parents Do And Don't Pull Their Children's Teeth Out In 2017"
/r/MensRights03/12/17 07:47 AM
19

"Rhinoplasty does not cut your face. It is just the nose that is cut. Your face is under the nose."
/r/MensRights02/10/17 04:48 AM
31

"Circumcision does not cut your penis. It is just the foreskin that is cut. Your penis is under the foreskin" Does whoever wrote this not realize the foreskin is part of the penis?
/r/MensRights02/10/17 04:35 AM
3

The child is not old enough to decide if he wants to be part of your religion.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 07:59 PM
1

Trump's father was probably intact (born to German parents in the early 1900s), and Trump's mother was from Europe, so he very well may be intact. Ivanka's on record having cut her sons, though.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 07:58 PM
5

You don't have all of your genitalia, and neither do I. I've never forgiven my parents for it.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 07:47 PM
13

This is like branding a child for political reasons, only much more painful and disfiguring. There are better ways to express your political beliefs and honor your heritage than amputating parts of your son's body.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 04:02 PM
2

HALLELUJAH!
/r/MensRights10/05/17 11:31 PM
2

Agreed
/r/MensRights10/05/17 11:31 PM
5

I realized when I was 10 and I saw a reference to "uncircumcised" men in a medical pamphlet.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 08:55 PM
4

This news from Calcutta shows that the Men's Rights Movement is truly needed worldwide, unlike feminism, which is only maybe necessary in some third world countries, but maybe not even there.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 08:54 PM
2

Why would you rather have the most sensitive part of your penis permanently amputated then undergo an hour or so of something horrible?
/r/MensRights08/05/17 06:17 AM
2

I was forcibly circumcised as an infant. I would rather be raped a dozen times. They both cause psychological damage, but only one leaves a giant scar on your most intimate part.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 06:17 AM
2

I consider having my genitals mutilated in infancy to be a horrible sexual assault. The comparison is involuntary body modification (MGM/"circumcision") to involuntary sexual intercourse (rape)
/r/MensRights08/05/17 06:15 AM
1

I would rather have someone forcibly touch or penetrate me than have someone grab my genitalia and amputate part of it without any anesthetic.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 06:13 AM
2

In what world is having someone forcibly penetrate you worse than having someone forcibly hack off part of your genitals with no painkillers?
/r/MensRights08/05/17 06:12 AM
6

Reminds me of the time I stayed at a hotel in Germany that had a sauna with a womens-only area and a mixed-gender area, but no area for men.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 08:54 PM
19

I remember when I was younger (i.e pre-teen), having thoughts about getting a painful papercut on my penis. I wonder if that was my subconscious remembering my circumcision.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 10:58 PM
3

No one except the mother knows what is best for her baby. Bullshit. My mother thought that amputating the most sensitive part of my penis without anesthetic was best for me. She was definitely wrong about that.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 11:45 PM
5

So if someone takes a photo of a four-year old's penis being touched by another adult, is that child porn?
/r/MensRights20/04/17 05:09 PM
2

"Once, this one man looked at my boobs when I was walking down the street. I felt so violated, it was a literal rape. Yeah, I know that men are so much more likely to be homeless, die on the job, and have their genitalia mutilated, but the fact that some guy looked at my boobs once is way worse. Where's my pacifier and diaper?"
/r/MensRights18/04/17 04:40 PM
1

It's like the fox who lost his tail.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 04:38 PM
2

I would definitely rather be called "kortibortor" than have half of my penis amputated.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 03:03 AM
1

Where was your father born?
/r/MensRights18/04/17 02:20 AM
7

Even if his future wife prefers cut penises, so what? Men aren't sex toys for women, to be modified for their pleasure. We're people who deserve rights.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 01:54 AM
3

1 Simple Thing Men Can Do For Feminism End It.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 09:34 PM
1

Yes, and intentionally cutting off part of someone's sex organs is sexual assault. Watch a circumcision, and you will see just how much they actually grope the infant's penis.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 09:31 PM
1

Yes, and circumcision is assaulting someone's sex organs with a knife, hence, it is sexual assault.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 07:07 PM
0

If it's intentionally directed at the penis, which circumcision is, it is sexual assault. If it's accidental (i.e. trying to shoot someone in the knee, having bad aim, and accidentally shooting their dick), it's not sexual assault. Intent matters.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 05:34 AM
2

If you stab me in the penis, that is definitely sexual assault of some form.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 02:59 AM
3

To circumcise a baby, they stick a sharp object between the foreskin and the glans. That sounds like penetration to me...
/r/MensRights07/04/17 10:19 PM
5

Reminds me of the time I was in Berlin, and the hotel sauna had a mixed-gender area and a women's only area. Absurd.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 06:18 PM
6

Fondling and cutting someone's genitals is rape. Forced infant circumcision is far worse than conventional rape. At least conventional rape doesn't permanently scar your genitals.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 05:01 PM
1

Heard of this?
/r/MensRights07/04/17 03:51 PM
12

You should have asked them, "how would you like it if your parents had trimmed your labia during infancy?"
/r/MensRights07/04/17 07:43 AM
3

I know, it was thinly veiled pro-MGM propaganda
/r/MensRights07/04/17 07:41 AM
9

Making it illegal to cut part of someone else's body of because of your religion is hardly a ban on religious practice.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 04:00 AM
8

Yes, because there is nothing more beautiful than holding down an innocent child and raping them with a knife! Such beauty!
/r/MensRights07/04/17 03:57 AM
7

I remember hearing about male genital cutting twice in sex ed. First, in fifth grade, when we learned about the scrotum, a friend of mine asked "is that what they cut off?", to which the teacher replied "no, and they don't really cut it in Europe." Then, in high school, our packet had one line that said "you are completely normal with a circumcised or uncircumcised penis."
/r/MensRights07/04/17 03:55 AM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights06/04/17 11:30 PM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights06/04/17 05:59 PM
2

Thanks!
/r/MensRights06/04/17 05:10 AM
23

MODERN SOCIETY It's okay to make fun of men for having small penises, but making fun of women for their breast size is wrong It's okay to cut off the most sensitive part of a baby boy's penis without their consent, but any cutting of the female genitals is horrible Women do better in school than men do, and are more likely to get a college degree Yet feminists claim women are the ones who are oppressed. If this weren't such a serious problem, it would be grotesquely comical
/r/MensRights06/04/17 03:52 AM
5

One of my professors does this.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 07:44 PM
1

I have dual citizenship (America and a European country, I won't say which one because it could be used to identify me), so if I want to have children, I would have to marry their mother in order to pass my European citizenship on. I would insist on a solid prenup, though.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 07:43 PM
3

How is someone evil or crazy enough to torture their own son?
/r/MensRights03/04/17 07:03 AM
2

Feminists need to understand that 1984 was a warning, not an instruction manual.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 05:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter