TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mencite Archive

View 12 posts and 989 comments by Mencite on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
158

Social IssuesMencite/r/MensRights02/03/18 05:33 PM
97

Mencite/r/MensRights27/07/18 11:44 AM
72

Social IssuesMencite/r/MensRights07/08/17 07:39 PM
60

DiscriminationMencite/r/MensRights13/04/18 03:16 PM
50

Edu./Occu.Mencite/r/MensRights06/04/16 10:30 AM
19

Social IssuesMencite/r/MensRights12/06/18 10:55 AM
16

Social IssuesMencite/r/MensRights12/07/17 12:52 PM
9

False AccusationMencite/r/MensRights12/01/18 10:49 AM
8

Social IssuesMencite/r/MensRights14/04/17 09:22 AM
6

Social IssuesMencite/r/MensRights12/07/17 01:02 PM
2

Social IssuesMencite/r/MensRights02/03/18 04:59 PM
0

Social IssuesMencite/r/MensRights16/11/17 12:56 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

ta for the answer.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 12:25 PM
2

Where did you read she sexually assaulted a man link please?
/r/MensRights18/04/19 12:09 PM
1

Female victimhood exists outside of feminism it also advocated by those so called anti feminist traditional woman and defended most by traditional man. You need to read what I wrote. I never said feminists aren't concerned with victimhood. The main danger today is female victimhood has grown in to a dangerous beast, the problem is many MRA's think well feminists are the issue so traditional women are the good girls cos they don't like feminists. This is very mistaken, women today who would claim…
/r/MensRights18/04/19 11:41 AM
1

Lets say a woman hit by her husband, in one instance. Perhaps a husband hitting in retaliation traditional woman argument would be she wouldn't have hurt him. Or it might be a case of a woman makes up a false case of assault and traditional woman would say well police have to investigate it women must be protected. (ie. the must be treated as ten times more important than men although they wouldn't put it that honestly.)
/r/MensRights13/04/19 06:25 PM
1

Female victimhood exists outside of feminism it also advocated by those so called anti feminist traditional woman and defended most by traditional man.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 11:24 AM
1

We've much more to fear from female victimhood its far more powerful than feminism. If you had you're eyes open you'd see most women are turning against feminism a clear indication that its not the real enemy.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 10:37 AM
14

the thing is while we may recognise the physical injury we don't recognise this as sexual assault. We assume that girls could never sexually assault a boy. If the genders were reversed this would be treated as ten times worse, it would be a national outrage.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 10:35 PM
2

This doesn't absolve men from having the responsibility to think for themselves. Why do white knights automatically side with women? Talking about feminism automatically distracts from the issue the issue is the self hatred that men feel that feel they have to attack other men. We need a far greater discussion on this self hate not just how men can help women. ​
/r/MensRights05/04/19 09:13 AM
4

He was asking the question from his point of view as to why he is automatically treated as guilty as a man but they are so selfish and conceited they talked about how he could help them. ​ This demonstrates why the selfishness of women means they can't have a monopoly on the discussion.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 08:31 AM
1

He was asking the question from his point of view as to why he is automatically treated as guilty as a man but they are so selfish and conceited they talked about how he could help them. ​ This demonstrates why the selfishness of women means they can't have a monopoly on the discussion.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 08:30 AM
2

Thanks done.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 08:18 PM
7

Absolutely brilliant question could we request this is stickied. ​
/r/MensRights04/04/19 07:29 PM
11

Yea he raised a fantastic question why am I guilty I've done nothing. As a man he's treated as guilty for all the bad things that have happened to women, he's asking is this fair. If a woman accused him he'd be treated as guilty by the system. ​ But these self centered women made it all about their suffering and the imaginary pay gap. True some women suffer somewhere but its the system itself which attacks men.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 06:07 PM
1

Have you ever come across the phenomenon of white knighting. Where a man will get really angry if he feels a man shows disrespect to a woman or a lack of care for a woman but the same man would never get this angry towards a man for disrespecting another men. Ie. a woman's welfare figures very high for him. Have you never heard of the term white knight in MRA circles. Just google the terms "White Knight" MRA. Why is this word so popular if this thing doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 08:12 PM
1

If you say anything against women its men who will attack you most.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 08:04 PM
2

Look you've never watched TV then? very naive. And mostly men will suggest men should be guilty in a discussion by bringing up a case of rapes in an argument to guilt trip men. ​ ​
/r/MensRights31/03/19 07:58 PM
2

Have you watched any tv?? Men go on about how all men should feel guilty for the bad things that a small number of men have done to women.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 07:51 PM
-2

Of course they're different, Traditional man's need to put women on a pedestal and treat men like dirt is the main driver of men's problems. White knighting through out the police the legal system and the media are the key issue. The fact that you don't realize feminism is different from white knighting suggests you need to go back to 101 and study this.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 11:39 AM
1

The issue is those white knights in the system who put women's victimhood on a pedestal. Mostly its the traditional men who put women on a pedestal nearly all of these police, judges and media propagandists are men. If we want to do anything about this we have to understand the anti male system. This tradcon male underlies all of this immense victim power women have.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 12:32 AM
-26

Nothing funny scummy cunt, post an articulate comment or don't post at all. Feminists aren't the issue the issue is those white knight men who believe female victimhood is sacrosanct.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 12:25 AM
1

You said it in response to my comment. Ie. my comment is puke. Its in everybody's interest that we have good communication.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 10:02 PM
1

I know what you said you didn't get my point. You must take a more tactical approach if those dummy white knights get burned by their own anti men bull it'll wake them up. What's puke supposed to mean? ​
/r/MensRights29/03/19 09:58 PM
1

This board is about communication so its important to be clear on what you're saying, quite being so cryptic.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 09:50 PM
2

I take the general point about the lack of progress in the men's movement I've been in this along time too and have become demoralized. But where you don't get somewhere you have to rethink your whole strategy. Our problem essentially is that the very people we're trying to help are our biggest opposition, white knights or generally traditional men. Thus we need a change of direction we must start to network at a local level and help those men who're genuinely support men's rights and and are ch…
/r/MensRights29/03/19 09:49 PM
2

I take the general point about the lack of progress in the men's movement I've been in this along time too and have become demoralized. But where you don't get somewhere you have to rethink your whole strategy. Our problem essentially is that the very people we're trying to help are our biggest opposition, white knights or generally traditional men. Thus we need a change of direction we must start to network at a local level and help those men who're genuinely support men's rights and and are ch…
/r/MensRights29/03/19 09:49 PM
1

No one on this board thinks of what they're saying or expresses what they want to say properly.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 04:41 PM
1

Ok interesting analogy but I think a better analogy is a war between two countries. Your side is vastly superior in warfare terms to the other but the opposition is winning only because a large percent of your troops feel a great self hatred and so attack their own people. Who then is the real enemy?
/r/MensRights29/03/19 10:47 AM
1

But its overwhelmingly men pass these laws and apply these unjust laws. Men are in the positions of power. Whether we call it chivalry or white knightism its men who feel good about attacking other men are the issue.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 10:36 AM
1

Yes but who is our main opposition?
/r/MensRights29/03/19 10:26 AM
1

If you can't make a sentence retard go somewhere else.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 08:57 AM
5

They're trying to make an example of her to convince men the system is fair. Now that men are starting to question that suffering of women is ten times more important than men they need to placate men and direct them to an enemy. She isn't the enemy the enemy is those white knights who put women on a pedestal.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 08:56 AM
3

No we want to wake men up to the reality of female victim supremacy.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 06:10 PM
1

Good question I believe a dual approach is required. ​ 1.advancing arguments on men's issues in a clear concise way on the internet. ​ Networking and finding like minded conscientious MRA's locally and helping them when they get in trouble with the system and helping them particularly when they challenge the system. I stress this as its mostly traditional men themselves are our biggest opposition they believe men must always put women first and insist men man up. So we should appreciate it when …
/r/MensRights26/03/19 12:48 PM
2

Thanks a very good question. However our predicament is worsened by the fact that the very people we wish to help are our worst enemies i.e. men. Why should we be supporting those men who're out greatest enemies. If they need to get falsely accused and have their lives destroyed to wake up then so be it. I would say we should form closely knit grass roots groups of men of a similar view point and support each other either in practical ways like contributing financially for a false allegation cas…
/r/MensRights08/03/19 01:11 AM
-11

Dumb article this is hardly the real opposition of men's rights.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 01:04 AM
3

We must challenge female victim power at a deeper level. We must destroy the idea than any infringement on a woman is ten times more significant on an infringement on a man.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 09:44 PM
3

If if that's the case it's still very extreme to be in court for propositioning a woman. If a man was hit the police wouldn't care whatsoever. But a woman is propositioned winked at or otherwise they bring him to court. It just goes to show that men themselves are men's worst enemies.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 01:26 AM
1

The equivalent would be to bully a women about her vagina that its too wide, or her labia aren't big enough or too smelly. The most annoying thing is this is from the lad bible they'd be terrified to make jokes about women even though they pretend to be lads. They'd make jokes about tits but never the sacred furry pot. ​
/r/MensRights10/02/19 03:02 PM
1

The equivalent would be to bully a women about her vagina that its too wide, or her labia aren't big enough or too smelly. The most annoying thing is this is from the lad bible they'd be terrified to make jokes about women even though they pretend to be lads. They'd make jokes about tits but never the sacred furry pot.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 02:58 PM
1

Yea obvious bias but when exactly has Carlson argued in favor of men. He's no hero of ours. He argues for the traditional model of men where men are praised for putting women first and self sacrificing. Strangely he never argues against the gains gotten by women over the last couple of generation that would be too controversial. Hence he gives allows women the best of both worlds and men the worst of both worlds. Even worse he dresses himself up as being pro-men hence far worse than the worst fe…
/r/MensRights08/02/19 02:43 PM
1

For us as MRA's this is one of the central issues to demolish female victim power not testicular cancer or male suicide or divorces but Female victim power. Everything else revolves around this.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 11:59 PM
5

You forgot that talking about a guys dick size is much more personal. A better comparison would be guys talking about a woman's labia and clitoris which most women would be horrified with the idea if a boyfriend discussing openly. Dick shaming would be far worse given how much of men's identity seems to be bound up in it. ​
/r/MensRights18/01/19 03:43 PM
1

How are they nice guys?
/r/MensRights03/01/19 05:00 AM
1

They are men who get off in attacking other men in defense of the women folk they see this as a type of moral superiority but in reality its based on self hatred and the guilt tripping of men that's been going on for the last 70 years. They'd fall in to the tradcon category they get their name from Middle ages chivalry as they might see themselves in the tradition of such a knight. However in reality such knights wouldn't have been as subservient to male guilt and female victimhood we know from …
/r/MensRights03/01/19 03:02 AM
1

Crazy RadFems aren't the main enemy of men the main enemy is the chivalry white knights. RadFems are just a distraction from the real issues so stop bringing them up. ​
/r/MensRights02/01/19 11:24 AM
1

You're completely missing the point of this we're not necessarily concerned that someone got sexually assaulted. The issue is the double standard society says if the victim is female its a heinous crime if its male its a joke and the guy shouldn't be upset about it. Why are you here if you don't think issues effecting men are important. What's ridiculous getting all arrogant if you don't even understand the point being made. What age are you?
/r/MensRights01/01/19 06:54 PM
2

the double standard is there because it happens more often to women and generally they aren’t as strong physically to defend themselves. Yes but don't you understand that laws should treat people objectively and a crime against one person should be the same as a crime against another. Your argument is like saying well I've been mugged many times before so someone mugging me should be treated more seriously by the law. That doesn't make sense. Also the man is in politician mode so we don't know w…
/r/MensRights01/01/19 02:47 PM
1

Its not so much that I believe I'm going to be groped when I go out I just think no other area illustrates the differential in the treatment of men and women in society. If a guy grabs a woman's pussy he's treated like a very serious/dangerous criminal but if she groped his crotch area and he tried to report it at the very least he'd be told to shut up its a trivial thing. Is that differential in treatment fair.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 02:39 PM
2

Yet you'd be treated as a serious criminal if you did that to them. This is the area where the greatest differential exists between the sexes.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 02:30 PM
1

There’s no other area where the differential in the treatment of the sexes is so great than the area of sexual assaults. Where a man gopes a woman’s crotch its seen as a very serious crime the man would be charged, jailed and have to sign on the sex offenders register for a long time after but were it the other way around the man would be ridiculed for complaining. Remember the way David Beckham was treated by the newspapers when he was sexually assaulted, he was belittled and told he shouldn’t …
/r/MensRights01/01/19 02:28 PM
1

So why is it we never her guys like you telling a woman not to be neurotic when a man grabs her pussy.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 03:40 PM
1

You're reply is ambiguous. Are you saying grabbing someone's pussy is sexual assault or not??
/r/MensRights31/12/18 03:39 PM
8

Yea these women aren't as concerned about men as they're concerned that many men are starting to wake up. And they're concerned that these false allegations are playing out in the public arena where its starting to wake men up.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 03:37 PM
1

If a man had grabbed a pussy would it be sexual assault retard? ​
/r/MensRights30/12/18 08:06 PM
1

It would take one public case maybe to change it suddenly it wouldn't be ok.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 08:02 PM
2

Dummy so why aren't you in public telling women they shouldn't be so neurotic about this.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 07:56 PM
2

You're ignorant if a man grabbed a woman by the pussy he's be charged and on the sex offenders register for life. When a woman does he its made in to a joke. The police wouldn't take it seriously. Remember when David Beckham was grabbed by the genitals by a woman it was treated as a joke. You're totally discrediting yourself.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 10:30 AM
2

This is an excellent initiative I can't understand why a member of this subreddit would not support it unless they're trying to bog the sub down in petty arguments. We should be able to handle opposing arguments if this individual was putting forward well formed arguments that would be one thing but he's simply trying to put forward specious arguments to wear productive members down. I've noticed a lot of his posts are about throwing out specious comments which aren't to make a logical point jus…
/r/MensRights29/12/18 09:23 PM
6

Common dopey you missed the point of the argument, He didn't say all women were sex offenders he's saying there's a complete double standard in how society views both sexual assaults. I can't believe someone here tried that argument.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 09:06 PM
28

Yea definitely deserves jail time, if a man had grabbed her in the genitals he's be doing jail time.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 09:05 PM
1

Yea men feel they have to be extra careful but ultimately this is more down to the white knights who feel they have to attack any man who says something even vaguely disrespectful to women. We have to identify white knights as the main enemy of men's rights.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 09:05 PM
1

You're reasoning skills are severely limited, one doesn't prove all.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 05:39 PM
6

But at least in China men can hit women back they're not drilled with white knighting and chivalry all their lives. Obviously in this case he should have continued driving and kicked her cunt in when he got to her destination.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 05:38 PM
12

Everyone blames the woman primarily, she was on video hitting a bus driver. Hardly even a subject for men's rights we should be concerned with those subjects where society is against us not crap like this.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 05:37 PM
39

Obviously pretty stupid but it may wake up a few people.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 05:22 PM
2

I was at a community event helping out a dog came barking over to me I started chatting to the two girls with the dog. The father came over to me started asking me who I was and got angry I was talking to his kids. I told him he was overreacting and he started asking me if I had kids almost like it gave him a type of moral superiority. He did not realize that practically accusing someone of being a pedophile could be offensive. ​
/r/MensRights02/11/18 05:11 PM
6

I was at a community event helping out a dog came barking over to me I started chatting to the two girls with the dog. The father came over to me started asking me who I was and got angry I was talking to his kids. ​
/r/MensRights02/11/18 05:07 PM
2

I've respect for a woman who says that, it means she doesn't sanctify the female victim card, female victimhood is the real enemy.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 04:57 PM
1

Men express white knightism even when women aren't around. This is something in grained in men since they're born and at its core it has the guilt we've been fed throughout our whole lives. Don't know why guys keep red arrowing me we have to understand the process of why men are so anti men before we get anywhere.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 07:55 PM
2

Of all the prejudiced assumptions our society has against men this is the most insidious. Our whole culture assumes its impossible for women to have any sexual interest in children and all men are paedophiles waiting to strike. Any men working in this nursery would have been under suspicion. And the only reason this woman was caught was because she took these photographs and distributed them otherwise the thought of her abusing a child could never be entertained. We should spread this link every…
/r/MensRights27/10/18 03:56 PM
-1

Sorry but you've forgotten the fact that men are their own worst enemies and are often the ones to glorify white knightism and attacking men who've offended the women folk in any way. At the same time its they not the feminists who tell men to man up if they're attacked in anyway even if very severely. Its not feminists that are our primary enemy but these white knights which pervade thought out society.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 03:36 PM
1

Cheers for that.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 01:31 AM
14

This sounds like alarmism, if we're in the same list as the Jordan Petersen subreddit then we're in safe company. He's still a professor in the University of Toronto. As long as we don't incite violence (the reason the incels were banned) then we're ok. You have to wonder about the motives of such a member telling us we'll likely be banned. Is he/she trying to get us to self censor? this is the last thing we should be doing.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 11:11 AM
2

Yea often men accused of raping a woman is stripped beaten and tortured to death such is the obsession with female welfare. All the torturers are men. The real problem is men's greatest enemy are men not feminists. Its far better for enlightened men to network and support each other.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 10:27 PM
1

Why is rape worse than forced circumcision by a group.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 01:27 PM
0

Are you an idiot retard do you realize most don't come here everyday but if they find a reply in their inbox a few days latter the felt the need to answer that. They're not exactly equal dummy they're different acts some might argue forced circumcision is worse than rape. If you want to use female genital mutilation as a comparison, if a village was to forcibly circumcise a woman wouldn't it be see as a heinous crime it would be covered by newspapers all over the world. Result is the same crimes…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 08:36 AM
0

You really must be a bit slow if you don't think either of these points are relevant. First you say a comparison isn't relevant. If you hadn't noticed this subreddit is about equality hence we have to always do comparisons like I explained. You seemed to be dismissing this point. Its such a basic means of getting our point across to ask "what if something like this happened to a woman?" and demonstrate people would be outraged. It beggars belief that someone couldn't understand such a basic fact…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 05:32 PM
1

No I just asked him a simple question of clarification. See my reply to the poster.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 12:17 PM
1

Was curious if it was American law. Thanks for that might be possible to use it would at least be a useful argument to make. In theory everyone is treated equally under the law but we tend to apply these laws in very discriminative ways, normally we don't apply them when they might favour men. But even attempting such a legal action would help in changing the deeper prejudices in society, if the public discusses such a legal case they'll be more receptive to the arguments about the wrongness of …
/r/MensRights19/08/18 12:16 PM
2

Because everybody especially the Western media would be outraged if an entire village raped a woman because a couple of men had bits of their genitals cut off by an entire village its treated as nothing. In order to get our point across we always have to do comparisons to demonstrate the double standards in society. Obvious if you think of it, are you a woman?
/r/MensRights19/08/18 12:07 PM
24

Are you referring to American law?? Notice the quote I made where it says that nothing is done about these cases of forced circumcision.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 01:48 PM
1

Yea but is the person tht makes such comments the issue or is it those women who slyly play men against each other.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 01:25 PM
190

Horrific, and its far worse than rape. Its physically worse than rape given its cutting off part of the genitals. The fact that its done by a large group and hence part of the values the people makes it worse, just like the rape of a woman would be worse if carried out by a whole village. He said the practice has been ongoing for decades yet nobody has been apprehended to face charges of inflicting injuries on underage boys who cannot make decisions on their own. It looks like nothing is being d…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 01:22 PM
1

Yes that's true but isn't that the reason for this reporters criticism of Husar. Is she more worried about women than men, she's worried this plays out in the public arena, she's worried where men will see the female victimcard is abused they might take it away. see my previous post: Its an interesting article however I'm not sure she's as genuine as she makes out. Is she concerned that this is playing out in public and men are starting to catch on that women are abusing their victimcard. She's …
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:53 PM
1

Its an interesting article however I'm not sure she's as genuine as she makes out. Is she concerned that this is playing out in public and men are starting to catch on that women are abusing their victimcard. She's more clever than most she realizes that if we pedestalize women that men will resent it if women start to abuse it. I would love to be proved wrong but show me an article where she genuinely criticizes female victimhood and asks simple questions like why is a physical assault on a wom…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:43 PM
4

Moving forward, Mr McKenna will graduate from Duke in December and return to Scotland and has hopes of one day entering politics and becoming an MP. Maybe he'll be a spokesman for men. Sadly more people have to be burnt by female victimhood before guys start to wake up and do somethig about it.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 12:25 PM
1

I understand its gone on but maybe for the first time on reddit we've actually had a discussion so its time well spent. It matters less whether this comes from the left or right but the important point is that we can't lump it all in as gynocentricism or feminism. A woman who wants to be a top CEO is very different from a woman promotes female victimhood a woman who wants women's feelings or crimes against women to be considered 10 times more important than crimes against men. We shouldn't fear …
/r/MensRights10/08/18 07:17 AM
1

I've no problem with the original poster anyway she's saying women are strong. That would be a positive if we started treating women as strong and stopped treating them like victims. Certain women knock those women who advocate for the strength of women not for any concern for men but because they believe it might effect women's victimhood.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:29 PM
1

White knighting is mostly done by conservatives, notice how Antifa is able to punch, kick and pepper spray women. Talking about our culture being gynocentric and that's why men white knight isn't telling us anything. In a way its gynocentric in a general sense but that's just saying its women focused, that's the result not the cause. Female victimhood is so sucessful today as it gives men a way of asserting their manhood. Given men are so brow beaten and guilt tripped the only acceptable way of …
/r/MensRights09/08/18 01:59 PM
1

Calling it gynocentric just says its women focused it doesn't say much else, describing it as white knighting describes its origins better. This female victim system has fed off a synergy between the female victims and the traditional need for men to feel strong in protecting women. The interesting thing about this avenging the women folk is it comes more from those traditional men hence I call it white knighting.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 08:13 PM
1

Victimhood comes from women today most of these women would never call themselves feminists. We have to get rid of the term feminists its a complete distraction. These women who say they hate men aren't the problem they don't influence other men to attack each other. We must be clear on this. There is perpetual pity machine in action cultivating guilt in men and rewarding white knighting. This has formed the anti male culture today such that most men seem to be effected today but to different de…
/r/MensRights08/08/18 11:43 AM
1

It depends on how a woman behave not whether at some point in their lives they've used the word feminist to describe themselves. Just because someone uses the word feminism doesn't make them suddenly our enemy. What matters is do they promote female victimhood?? I know many women who're very sly they'd never call themselves feminists but would play the victim and play men off against each other.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 11:25 PM
1

The guilting of men has gone in to overdrive over the last 60 years, this is what's really turned men against each other. We're shown the abusive husband abusing his wife or the nasty man raping a defenseless female.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 11:14 PM
0

I've known many men who exposed this but their now living in bedsits while their wives shag a younger men in the house this guy is still slaving to purchase. Don't you think its about time we started to question all of this.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 11:13 PM
0

Do Irish women have any idea how sly and revolting they are? You're on a men's rights board trying to bully a man because he's looking for the equality that we're supposed to have. At some point you'll find a man who won't tolerate your Irish woman slyness and nastiness!
/r/MensRights07/08/18 11:11 PM
1

It is everywhere women constantly promote their victimhood. White Knights aren't just one individual white knights are all those instruments of the state that are used to attack men, the police, the military and the legal system.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 10:56 PM
2

Yea far worse are those women who pretend to like men but then play men off against each other by harnessing men's needs to feel strong and self sacrifice for women. We have little to fear from this woman we've a lot to fear from women who constantly promote female victimhood.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 10:54 PM
0

This made more sense 100 years ago a woman couldn't have just kicked a man out of the home, or she couldn't have just made up a story of him hitting or raping her and destroyed his life. Women are manipulating this sense of self sacrifice to play men off against each other by playing the victim. We should have far more respect for a woman like this who's prepared to be honest with us.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 10:49 PM
1

She maybe you're enemy but at least she's telling you this to your face. Please learn something about women they manipulate,they manipulate men against each other. Today female victimhood is all powerful they just have to play the victim to play men off against each other.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 10:43 PM
0

No its female victimism combined with the traditional protective model of men which plays men off against each other and is the real danger. At least we're on guard for anything man hating feminists say.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 02:01 PM
-8

So what a woman who's honest for a change, far better than those women who manipulate us in to the traditional model and play the victim so they can play men off against each other. You're really very naive if you think she's the enemy.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:47 PM
0

Its not just about men's rights versus feminism, those women who try to get men to fall in to the traditional role model and be women's protectors are far more dangerous than feminists they can play men off against each other. Just because a woman used the word feminist to describe herself at some time in her life is irrelevant its just a distraction from the real issues. Those traditional obligations on men to sacrifice themselves for women.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:41 PM
0

I love women there's something about Irish women. They're the slyest creatures on this Earth, and think people don't see through them we know how to treat Irish hags in Canada.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:35 PM
3

Its not just about men's rights versus feminism, those women who try to get men to fall in to the traditional role model and be women's protectors are far more dangerous than feminists they can play men off against each other. Just because a woman used the word feminist to describe herself at some time in her life is irrelevant its just a distraction from the real issues. Those traditional obligations on men to sacrifice themselves for women.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:21 PM
1

Its not just about men's rights versus feminism, those women who try to get men to fall in to the traditional role model and be women's protectors are far more dangerous than feminists they can play men off against each other. Just because a woman used the word feminist to describe herself at some time in her life is irrelevant its just a distraction from the real issues. Those traditional obligations on men to sacrifice themselves for women.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:21 PM
1

Aggressive feminists who say they hate men get our shackles up. Female victims play on our emotions. Who is better at influencing us and putting us on the side of women.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:24 AM
2

Common what most other women do is far worse than these lesbians, they treat men like dirt and then play other men or the system against men.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:23 AM
2

Far better a woman who's honest about what she thinks than those women who play us men off against each other. We've really got to smarten up men are being played off against each other all the time.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:56 AM
0

Was confused by your commentary so I followed the fishy smell to your crotch. There's something about the slyness of Irish women, you hardly think you can come on a men's rights board make insults and try "the lame 13 year old kid" line just when someone makes a vagina joke. Shaming tactics don't work on a men's rights board and nothings off limit on the internet definitely not your smelly pussy.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 07:25 AM
0

Checked back your profile and commentary. Something smells fishy must be your tuna crotch.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 10:28 AM
2

I'll clarify I didn't like her speech overall, like most women she's not as much of a victim as she thinks she is, She at least is being honest, I don't think she's trying to deceive men by in to helping feminism, her brand of feminism is more genuinely concerned about men, hence her request for men to help her brand of feminism. Her brand of feminism is at least more fair to men than victim feminism which is the most dangerous brand at all.. At the very least she recognizes that men are harmed …
/r/MensRights29/07/18 03:00 PM
1

I understand you're point but I'm making the point that many of those women who praise men do so as they want to keep be best of the traditional world where men white knight for women and men see female victimhood as ten times more important than men's welfare. We need to learn to be tactical if a feminist says she hates men that's a good thing that'll redpill some men. Now that men are waking up that something is wrong, the last thing we need is women placating men or throwing in distractions o…
/r/MensRights29/07/18 02:44 PM
2

TBH I'd imagine she's repent on that statement I've seen some of her more recent videos. I make the point because its far more complex that a woman says good things about men therefor she's our ally. Often these women who butter us up are trying to placate us give we're catching on something is wrong. They want to sell us the traditional model when it comes to female victimhood being sacrosanct and men risking their lives for women. They won't argue for a complete return to the traditional model…
/r/MensRights29/07/18 02:29 PM
-3

We have to do something about guys who just throw around insults without reading the comment they're referring to. If you have an issue this guy should be able to make a logical argument. Such insults doesn't do anything to create any discussion.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 02:26 PM
0

That would suggest a case for legal action given its organized humiliation of men. Women are expected to use the stalls where they get privacy from the opposite sex. Men are expected to use the urinals in front of women which is sexually humiliating to one gender hence its sexual discrimination.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 02:15 PM
2

What kind of point is that. This organized humiliation of men shouldn't be acceptable they're basically saying women should use the stalls and have privacy. Men should use the urinals in display of women and be humiliated. There's obviously a case for a legal action given its organised sexual humiliation of one gender.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 02:12 PM
1

You've an interesting point, please clarify.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 02:06 PM
1

Wasn't sure if that was sarcasm or genuine. Could you clarify please.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 02:01 PM
1

But not very dignified if men have to go to the toilet in front of women.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 01:59 PM
1

That means then men have to use the urinal in front of women.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 01:57 PM
2

Wasn't Camille Paglia the one who described the cutting off of Bobbits penis as revolutionary act.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 01:38 PM
1

What is the layout of the gender neutral toilet? Is it just stalls, is it one toilet, or is it stalls and urinals?
/r/MensRights28/07/18 01:37 PM
1

If the other toilet is gender neutral there are no urinals there either.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 01:36 PM
4

Do you think most men want to be using the urinal in front of women. Stalls are better than urinals.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 01:34 PM
12

Men can use the actual toilet, more conservative men don't want to be using a urinal in front of women. A urinal is a single use device a toilet is more useful.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 01:32 PM
1

This is the most important thing someone could say today. She said positive things about men in that speech but more importantly women saying something positive doesn't mean anything its their sense of fairness that matters. Often women who say "positive" things like "oh yea men are great" are those women who want to manipulate men they want to lock men in to the traditional way of thinking where men have to defend the women folk. Thus women can keep their equality privileges and men will still …
/r/MensRights28/07/18 12:17 PM
-19

I would be interested in knowing whether these initiative s advance the cause of men's rights in terms of tackling the direct aggression of the state against men. I'm not saying these sheds aren't a good thing but what about the direct aggression of the state against men when woman plays her victim card. Often these sheds are being initiated as a way of placating me given men are starting to wake up to the double standards in society. What about the more controversial issues in society like fals…
/r/MensRights28/07/18 12:03 PM
1

This week Nagaland Government said he was innocent. It submitted a report stating the man was falsely accused of rape and it was in fact 'consensual sex', but the investigation is still ongoing following the arrest of 42 locals involved in the beating. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2993383/Terrifying-new-footage-reveals-1-000-strong-Indian-lynch-mob-string-slowly-kill-man-accused-raping-murdering-11-year-old-girl.html
/r/MensRights28/07/18 10:01 AM
1

He's making up nonsense that he was from Bangladesh, that was a different case. Also he just made up he wasn't found innocent. But he never got a chance to be found innocent as the was tortured to death. His attempt to just throw out two bogus defenses of this was just an attempt to muddy the waters and distract from the fact that India is a man hating place where female victimhood is invoked especially as its under pressure from the international community. We must get rid of guys on this board…
/r/MensRights28/07/18 09:59 AM
1

Yea sorry for being rude. I missed where I said that, but there are so many members on here who just try to write nonsense comments just to distract from the truth I mistakenly assumed you were another one.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 09:54 AM
0

I've heard many feminists say positive things about men in fact far more positive than most women. For example Emma Watson discussed how men are harmed by the chivalry dynamic I don't have her exact words but she talked about how men are harmed by the obligation they feel they have to attack other men in defense of women. This is probably the most honest thing I've ever heard a woman say. Feminists are often far more honest and forth-right about issues than other women who often slyly manipulate…
/r/MensRights28/07/18 09:52 AM
1

Who's attacking a strawman?
/r/MensRights27/07/18 08:25 PM
1

Who are you saying "fuck you asshole to"?
/r/MensRights27/07/18 08:24 PM
1

So you're saying it was because he was from Bangladesh but then you're saying its because he was found guilty.You're a lying sack of shit in other words. Authorities believe the guy is innocent the Bangladesh case was a different case. This week Nagaland Government said he was innocent. It submitted a report stating the man was falsely accused of rape and it was in fact 'consensual sex', but the investigation is still ongoing following the arrest of 42 locals involved in the beating. http://www.…
/r/MensRights27/07/18 08:18 PM
1

He quoted only part of it.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 08:11 PM
1

Who is this directed towards????
/r/MensRights27/07/18 08:10 PM
1

We don't need to come here for anti male comments. You see such a picture and all you can say is he wasn't found innocent. If you were stripped and tortured to death for hours you wouldn't be found innocent either as you'd be dead. The authorities believe he was innocent. The case from Bangladesh was a different case.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 08:04 PM
1

It appears he was falsely accused of rape but its irrelevant if we can't conclusively prove his was innocent he should have got a trial. It submitted a report stating the man was falsely accused of rape and it was in fact 'consensual sex', but the investigation is still ongoing following the arrest of 42 locals involved in the beating. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2993383/Terrifying-new-footage-reveals-1-000-strong-Indian-lynch-mob-string-slowly-kill-man-accused-raping-murdering-11-ye…
/r/MensRights27/07/18 07:57 PM
2

It appears he was falsely accused of rape but even if we can't prove he was innocent he never got a trial. It submitted a report stating the man was falsely accused of rape and it was in fact 'consensual sex', but the investigation is still ongoing following the arrest of 42 locals involved in the beating. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2993383/Terrifying-new-footage-reveals-1-000-strong-Indian-lynch-mob-string-slowly-kill-man-accused-raping-murdering-11-year-old-girl.html
/r/MensRights27/07/18 07:55 PM
2

Thanks a sane reply for a change. It submitted a report stating the man was falsely accused of rape and it was in fact 'consensual sex', but the investigation is still ongoing following the arrest of 42 locals involved in the beating. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2993383/Terrifying-new-footage-reveals-1-000-strong-Indian-lynch-mob-string-slowly-kill-man-accused-raping-murdering-11-year-old-girl.html
/r/MensRights27/07/18 07:49 PM
1

If you're not going to engage in proper debate get lost you're milestone around the necks of men.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 07:47 PM
-6

what does that mean???
/r/MensRights27/07/18 02:10 PM
-1

Don't you think genius if lynch mobs were stripping publicly and torturing people in front of thousands in India just because they're from Bangladesh it would be on the news nightly. The reason they're treated like this is because he was accused of a crime against women.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 02:07 PM
-7

Why does it make zero sense. He's using two arguments just to be on the safe side not sure what his real argument is.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 02:01 PM
1

Look at the title you retarded fool. Get lost if you want to help men's rights.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 01:42 PM
-5

So you're *saying* it was because he was from Bangladesh but then you're saying its because he was found guilty.You're a lying sack of shit in other words. *edit word omitted.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 01:41 PM
1

This article is about feminists all feminists being incels. You've just said 80% of women so likely 80% of feminists are considered attractive by men. So at the very least 80% of feminists couldn't be incels, so at the very least 80% of this theory is complete horseshit you brain dead cunt. Please go some where else or stop posting on here, I've come across you before and you just wast peoples time here. Please go somewhere else if you care about bettering the situation for men.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 11:39 AM
0

A better comparison would be if it was about how men preferred tight vaginas or big meaty pussy lips.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 11:34 AM
1

There are lots of attractive feminists out there they're obviously not incels. No point in making a point like this which everybody knows is rubbish.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 02:50 PM
1

That's my point, she's a feminists. The title of this thread is "Feminists are just female Incels". Emma Watson is a feminists therefor it follows she's a female incel. Do you see my point?
/r/MensRights09/07/18 02:48 PM
0

Is Emma Watson an incel? I could give plenty of other examples but you get the point while it may be true in a small number of cases some women can't get sex this isn't true on the whole of feminists, most have completely different motives usually misplaced sense of victimhood. Saying feminists are incels is irrational and just makes us look stupid.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 01:38 PM
0

Why should women be incels? They can easily get sex. Reread my comment.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 05:30 PM
-10

Yes but that doesn't mean a woman becomes a feminist because she can't get sex. Most women even if they're ugly can get some guy to have sex with them. This dumb thread is just another distraction. It looks like the starter is annoyed the term incel is being associated with MRA's so he thinks its genius to associate it with feminists. A very stupid exercise.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:52 PM
11

Its much deeper than whining wimps or feminists, feminists couldn't have controlled the system as much as this. This is largely the traditional model telling men they must man up and not be whining wimps. Worse of all men themselves are played off against each other.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:48 PM
4

A few ugly lesbians that every body hates, that created this.. Its female victimism that's create all of this.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 11:17 AM
2

I'm for men's rights, for women's rights, for children's rights. Possibly the most vacuous pointless comment you could make. You are not respectful this is one of the few politicians who's put his head above the parapet to say just how it is how all men are demonized and you then knock him down in such a sly way. This isn't something that has been demonstrated by either DL or SHY in this instance. If you have a problem with David Leyonhjelm has said you should formulate it better than some ignor…
/r/MensRights05/07/18 12:19 PM
7

Look we don't have the language yet to tackle this misandry so its inevitable that we'll get frustrated with the other side. We cannot fault this guy who's the first to say in this way that men are blamed for the actions of a small number of men. But more to the point this is idiotic that the first post on this matter is that "he just keeps digging himself deeper". When go out in to the public and argue for men's rights we get told we just dig ourselves deeper and deeper.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 04:49 PM
5

One of the first public official to stick up for men's rights and understand that men are maligned in society and this is the first comment? What is the likes of you doing on this subreddit in the first place?
/r/MensRights03/07/18 04:00 PM
2

< It just isn't considered due to a combination of women being physically inferior to men, and women having extreme favor in the justice system Yea hence the real enemy isn't feminism but chivalry/white knightism. Men are their own worst enemies.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 01:23 PM
1

You said you've no interest in men's rights so stop taking up bandwith idiot.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 07:03 AM
1

Like I said you've not interest in men's rights so get lost.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 02:04 PM
1

If you're not interested in men's rights get lost. You're doing so much to justify you're original stupid comment about avoiding women. No matter how much you try to justify your original stupidity bottom line is we as men shouldn't be afraid to walk next to a woman for fear of being accused of rape or harassment. You've no interest in getting rid of the prejudice against men so get lost. If you don't see this simple
/r/MensRights21/06/18 02:03 PM
2

Yea but my point is we need to stop caring about these women completely, we need to stop thinking its our duty to be good men and defend the women.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 10:56 AM
1

You're not threatened by a situation the woman feels she is dummy. Do you actually cross the road every time you see a woman in the distance for fear she might make a false allegation.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 10:52 AM
1

That is not being smart that's living like a coward. Living smart is confronting your fears and the prejudices against men in society so you can walk down the street with out being accused.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 10:51 AM
1

If you aren't interested in eradicating the anti male bias in society why are you here?
/r/MensRights20/06/18 07:58 PM
1

What age are you?
/r/MensRights20/06/18 07:56 PM
0

Retard the world shouldn't revolve around women, why should a man cross the street on the risk that a woman may make up a false allegation.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 07:55 PM
1

I tried my best to explain it to you, surely you can't be this stupid. The black person isn't the one threatened the white person is the one claiming to be threatened. Should the black person cross the road because the white person claims to be threatened by him because he is black?
/r/MensRights20/06/18 07:49 PM
2

You're avoiding the question. Would a black person interested in black rights say that he would cross the road the avoid a white person accusing him of attacking him. He would make a point of walking alongside the white person to express his rights.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 06:33 PM
1

Lets try again. Would a black person say "there is a white person I better cross the road in case they accuse me of trying to attack or rob them." I think you can understand that. Would a black person say that? Yet you're on a men's rights board but say the equivalent.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 06:03 PM
0

Would it be right to cross the street as a white person, when encountering a black person heading towards me? Not at all what I was saying. reread what I said. On principle, no. On the other hand, if your neighbourhood has high crime rate then I'd advocate crossing the street to avoid anyone (that's regardless of gender, race) if it means ensuring your own safety. Nothing to do with it, crossing the road for safety is something completely different. To bring this home -- You don't know the woman…
/r/MensRights20/06/18 05:50 PM
2

Keeping a receipt is very different. Would you cross the road to avoid being accused of trying to attack a white person? The possibility of being accused would make you more likely to walk alongside this person.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 05:45 PM
1

I know its a reality that women are allowed make false allegations and the the police are obliged to give priority to women but we're here to change just that not play along with them. Look at my analogy of a black person. Would a black person say I change to the other side of the road if I see a white person just so a white person doesn't make false allegations against me that I tried to attack or rob him?
/r/MensRights20/06/18 05:23 PM
1

I'll give you a simple analogy if you would respond to it. He's saying its good for a man to cross to the other side of the street in case the woman things he's a danger to her and in case he gets accused and charged. Would he say to a black person its a good idea to change to the other side of the street in case you're accused of trying to attack the white person or rob him. No how do you think that would be received. Surely the black person would be angry and after lots of expletives would say…
/r/MensRights20/06/18 05:17 PM
2

So do I. If in doubt sex swap and ask if your comfortable with the conclusion you get.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 04:20 PM
0

Why should he have to cross the road just cos she fears him. Why should she have the right to make false allegations just because she fears him. Is this fair? If we're here to change this then why is he here.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 04:19 PM
-2

Look you fool why do we accept the premise that women have the right to make accusations and play the system against men if they even fear us. That's what we're hear to change.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 04:16 PM
1

No I read it all why should we play along with their rules that men are a danger to women and have to cross the road so they don't fear us. Why do we have to care whether they fear us or not. Your comment suggests you didn't engage your brain before you started on the keyboard.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 04:14 PM
0

It is fine for women to state at men's crotch, just like it should be fine for men to look at women too Look at you wrote. Is it OK for men to stare at women's crotches notices you deliberately left this out. So the implication is that you don't think its OK to look at women's crotches.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 10:56 AM
1

You missed the point tits aren't vagina. Would they object if you stared at their crotch?
/r/MensRights20/06/18 10:52 AM
2

The comment that men are flattered beyond imagination is very ignorant. But excellent retort that he believes women are flattered beyond their imaginations when he shows and interest in their crotch.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 10:40 AM
24

Call them a disgusting old paedo woman and threaten to call the police. If you tried touching some woman's kids she'd do that.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 10:27 AM
12

Exactly why should be accept the premise that women are ten times more important than men.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 10:25 AM
-14

You're an idiot you're accepting the premise that men are evil.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 10:25 AM
-4

If I've a few minutes to kill I might follow her a few blocks, problem is I usually don't.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 10:22 AM
1

This all goes to show how severely bigoted most women are, they're severely clueless as to how bad they are and need a spell on the inside to persuade them.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 01:03 PM
1

No just arrest them for breach of the peace and for the most extreme bigotry possible, labeling men as pedophiles together, this together with a long sentence might wake them up.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 12:59 PM
1

Not this nonsense again, we were never this subservient to women. At those times when we would have defended women men would have had compensations. A father would have risked his life for his family but would have at least have been treated with respect in his household to balance things out. If his wife insulted him he could have hit her, in fact in those times rape of his wife or daughter would have been a crime not against the woman but against the property of the man. My question to these d…
/r/MensRights19/06/18 12:50 PM
27

Some mums use their mum status i.e. female victim status to be bullies to men. He should have just ignored them and carried on changing the child's nappy, it would have been interesting to see what would have happened if the police were called.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 10:16 AM
1

Think I'd prefer to see her dressed like that.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 08:13 AM
5

Yes but the chivalry traditional man with its demand that men should self sacrifice for women is a far greater enemy to men than feminism. Real problem is traditional man is very effective at selling this self sacrifice for men.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 07:10 AM
1

Yea it would be seen as sexual harassment if a man had been watching the woman.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 07:07 AM
1

Yea interesting its just that most men would feel they shouldn't complain about these type of things. Would be interesting if more men tried it. The case you're thinking of however may have happened in the US. https://www.nytimes.com/1990/11/03/us/woman-is-acquitted-in-trial-for-using-the-men-s-room.html
/r/MensRights18/06/18 07:06 AM
2

You missed the point again, the thread starters point is it is an infringement on the men's privacy to have to pee in front of a woman. It would be if women had to pee in front of men.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 06:46 AM
1

You missed my point I'm not talking about a teacher being caught in bed with a 15 year old. I'm talking about cases where a female baby sitter removes a boys underwear to examine his penis but says she's checking if he wet himself.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 04:46 PM
0

But my argument eventually sinks in which is what's important in the end.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 04:38 PM
16

The real story is society ignoring those cases of sexual abuse of young boys by female babysitters. At least the newspapers have started to talk about teachers having sex with underage males.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 10:41 PM
13

Wake up to what exactly? I understand there is sexism, but that’s not something can can be legally or politically fixed, outside of criminal actions, in the same way as racism. Are you joking? If you were hit in a bar the police wouldn't care if a woman were the CCTV would be on the nightly news. Everywhere you look women are treated as ten times more important than men.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 06:43 PM
1

Starting to agree with this, we have to stop being upset with female victimhood.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 06:35 PM
-12

Its so blatant it'll wake up some men. But not a dummy like you.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 06:33 PM
-31

Of course but its a good thing they charge a man tax. It wakes up a few more men.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 03:55 PM
0

Your period flow is drowning this thread, shove a sock in it.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 01:51 PM
3

Yes but it'll take a high profile case of a woman being charged for people's attitude to change and people to say "oh this is sexual assault".
/r/MensRights13/06/18 12:40 PM
4

Yea definitely these women are sexually assaulting the guys and should be charged. This seems to be a regular technique by women to pick pocket but they should still be charged for sexual assault. Problem most guys don't believe they should complain they don't believe sex assault is something a woman does to a man or they believe they have to like it.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 12:39 PM
0

I don't consider it a disgrace to be willing to defend someone who is weaker than me. First thing is dummy American if you're going to start making angry dumb posts at least understand the other sides point. We don't think either its a disgrace to help someone who's weaker than you. It just when did you last see an article attacking people for not coming to the aid of a man who was kicked by a stronger man. In the scheme of things a kick is a relatively mild attack if a man was beaten badly on a…
/r/MensRights13/06/18 11:27 AM
1

I'm not pissed off women want equality I'm pissed off once moment they want equality the next second they want white knights to risk their lives in a way women from 200 years ago wouldn't have expected. We're not incels mostly mgtow (hope you know the difference) also many have girlfriends/wives. What is your idea of striving for men, do you want men to feel obliged to risk their lives for women. Do you want society playing men off against each other with 2 sons. Let me guess you're American?
/r/MensRights12/06/18 09:12 PM
-2

No but they do read my message twice.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 07:42 PM
1

Are you for real. Do you realize you're on a men's rights board idiot. The whole reason behind this board is we shouldn't have to self sacrifice for someone who wants equality and hates us. What the fuck are you doing here if you can't understand this.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 06:59 PM
1

I will take it up with him. More to the point though we should have a very clear message if women want equality which they do let them have it. Stop playing to any suggestion that we have to self sacrifice for women.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 06:51 PM
-3

If you knew anything all this nonsense about CIS gendered and what sex someone identifies with is a complete distraction we should be facing on the key things like the fact that society tells us we must self sacrifice and ultimately attack other men for the good of women.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 06:48 PM
-2

Have to wake up some dummies here first before waking up the newspaper.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 06:43 PM
6

Maybe this will annoy some men and perhaps wake them up.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:59 PM
1

Look on the bright side this might annoy some people and wake them up.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:58 PM
3

Yea but they make it so obvious like that you've got a possible legal case.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:42 PM
6

Furchfur, Can you reply to my message please. Regarding thread there is no way out of this but to destroy the victim card.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:40 PM
-6

Regardless of whether she attacks white men what right does she have to expect men to risk their safety for her. Is this not female entitlement? Even worse that a newspaper should print such an article shaming men and playing men off against each other for the safety of women. If we don't understand how this works we're nothing.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:28 PM
2

Men don't get paid more than women for the same work dummy. Do you believe men have to protect women?? If you believe men have to protect women then you accept women's ability to play us against each other.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:25 PM
0

Are you new to men's rights? Forget the who do they identify as shit surely we've more important things to worry about. Like the fact that national newspapers are shaming men to risk their lives to defend a woman who despises them when the same newspaper would tell the men themselves to man up if they were attacked on the tube. Men today are played off against each other. Geddit?
/r/MensRights12/06/18 12:49 PM
1

This is just silliness nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 11:17 AM
10

If you think about it for a second we don't want anonymity surely we want discussion of this. We want society to stop the two class system where female victimhood is sacrosanct and men have to man up.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 11:04 AM
1

Yes I understand there's a change in pain response long term that was the point of the study. But in the title of this thread mentions "circumcision results in long term cognitive changes" this isn't talked about in the study.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 08:56 AM
1

Interesting study but headline is incorrect, where does it say anything about circumcision resulting in long term cognitive changes.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 08:16 PM
1

Interesting study but headline is incorrect, where does it say anything about circumcision resulting in long term cognitive changes.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 08:16 PM
1

But its good that she's being honest and forthright about her hatred. Far worse are those women who manage to play the part of victims and manage to play men off against each other.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 02:42 PM
3

We've all absorbed this anti male hatred in society.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 02:03 PM
1

There's some truth in this, its men themselves are men's worst enemy usually in the form of white knights who feel they have to attack other men based on the victimhood of a woman.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 03:30 PM
7

Yes this is deeper than feminism very often its men themselves are men's worst enemy not 3rd Wave Feminism. Largely for the last 60 years we've been conditioned to get upset on any infringements of women and to laugh off any injustices towards men.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 07:44 AM
2

Problem is men are men's worst enemy. Women automatically get upset about another women's suffering but men are ready to attack any men who's seen as disrespectful to women. We're fed constantly the narrative that men are the abusers and the dead beats, so most men are ready to attack men. This isn't discussed in society, so the first most men become aware of this is when they're attacked by the system. We need to start networking at a local level and help those men who're awakened and want to s…
/r/MensRights07/06/18 07:29 AM
1

Yea true I was more of raising this as a possibility. I'm aware that most men wouldn't want to press charges. That's why I believe that our main objective isn't fighting for men's rights as such but educating men and raising their consciousness. Once we raise their consciousness changes will happen soon enough.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 06:33 AM
168

Looks like an admission of a crime he could have her charged on that basis problems is men thing they're supposed to enjoy this type of thing and feel they have to man up.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 03:15 PM
1

Look when I talked about the getting rid of the victim card I was talking of the female victim card not the male victim card.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 12:27 PM
0

THE FEMALE VICTIM CARD! COMPRENDE?
/r/MensRights01/06/18 04:50 PM
-3

A large percent of women use their victimhood as a weapon. Are you a woman?
/r/MensRights01/06/18 01:36 PM
1

How many times do I have to tell you women don't have to complain because they're assigned female nurses in the first place. They may be assigned to provide food but not to wash the or touch their genitals unless it was a truly exceptional situation. Have you any idea how bad your comments are? What is it about women that makes them so angered about men caring about their privacy. Why is it women feel they have to come on here an bully and abuse men for wanting the rights that they take for gran…
/r/MensRights01/06/18 12:06 PM
-23

Yea, but women have such victim power I resent it, they can destroy you at any second so why should I play fair.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 11:47 AM
0

There's nothing there except past comments, there's no profile as such. I know there are plans to roll out a profile but haven't seen signs of it yet. If you meant past comments you should have said that.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 10:48 AM
0

Before everyone is like "Oh a feminist in disguise". Check my profile you will see that I'm definitely not one. We have a profile in reddit? How do I access your profile?
/r/MensRights01/06/18 10:22 AM
2

Google is just a reflection of the underlying prejudices in society against men. No point in being angry with google for this, we have to work on the anti male sentiment in society which mostly comes from men themselves.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 10:05 AM
1

Google is just a reflection of the underlying prejudices in society against men. No point in being angry with google for this, we have to work on the anti male sentiment in society which mostly comes from men themselves.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 10:04 AM
18

Gundrum cited Title IX, saying that the school district was discriminating against her daughters because they were sexual assault survivors. We have to understand that female victimhood is a weapon against men, we have to fight female victimhood.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 09:15 AM
-23

Wouldn't want to touch them either they're as ugly as sin.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 09:13 AM
34

Everything comes back to our obsession with female victimhood. We can never have fairness in society if we've such an obsession with female victimhood. We can't have logical resolution of our problems with such an obsession with female victimhood.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 09:08 AM
0

Why don't you read my comment before posting. I'm talking about the female victim card you fool. If you groped a woman you'd get a few years in jail if she groped you nothing would happen. Any crime against women is seen as ten times more important than the same crime against men. All roads lead to female victim power if you don't understand that don't come on here making a fool of yourself.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 08:37 AM
1

You were the one who started by calling me an asshole because I asked for something for men that women take for granted. And stop hiding behind nurses pretending I'm abusing them to make abusive comments to me. What is it about some women that makes them feel they have to silence and bully men who speak out about this subject? How many times have you told women to stop being assholes because she didn't want a male nurse fiddling with her vagina..
/r/MensRights01/06/18 08:32 AM
1

No, we must stop thinking any sexual assault on women warrants 7 years in prison.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 11:18 PM
1

having or showing a cunning and deceitful nature. "a sly, manipulative woman" Although this doesn't really convey the nastiness and furtiveness I've experienced with women. The word sly conjures up very nasty associations.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 07:55 PM
1

I've never in my life heard a woman dismiss women as being petty or ridiculing them for wanting privacy from male nurses or even male doctors. Hence I rest my case you're being sly again.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 07:24 PM
2

Which is why the only solution is to destroy female victim card. As long as it exists female victimhood will come back in some form to destroy men.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 05:33 PM
0

No we must give up on the victim card completely why should crimes against women be seen a ten times as important as crimes against men.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 05:31 PM
1

A reasonable point but if its so clear cut the system will probably charge her just to give the impression that the system is fair, given there's been so much publicity to false sexual assaults recently.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 10:30 AM
12

Yea good that he reported it but she should have been charged with something more serious.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 11:09 PM
1

Yes but why don't you tell women they're snowflakes or assholes for wanting a female nurse, why is it you come on to men's rights board telling us we're assholes for wanting equality.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 07:23 AM
1

Look very often a trial can go on for years or in this case he spent 8 months in jail. We shouldn't be happy being second class citizens by a long shot. Publicity like this wakes young guys up. Do we want men to be bullied in the quiet where the public never finds out about it until its too late.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 06:39 AM
0

It was a rhetorical question, I meant we should be demanding to stop treating female victims of sex crimes as all important. If we give women this all important victim card we shouldn't be surprised with they use it dishonestly. Its time to stop giving women this almighty victim power. Thus we must start pushing the mainstream media to ask these question. As it is we're pushing the mainstream media about anonymity which sweeps the problem under the carpet.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 07:02 PM
1

Never said it shouldn't have consequences, why doesn't anyone around her ever read the post they're replying to. My question was why in the first place should crimes against women be seen as ten times as important as crimes against men?
/r/MensRights24/05/18 03:52 PM
1

Well I've addressed these points previously. But: Get over yourself, snowflake. The lady nurses are not interested in your pee-pee. I wonder has such a sentence ever been uttered to a female patient who objected to a male nurse washing her or touching her vagina?
/r/MensRights24/05/18 03:50 PM
3

It might be good, might wake up a few Swedish guys but probably not.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 12:12 PM
1

Thank you for answering my question but seeing as it took you 10 (???) attempts at answering the question I’ve reason to doubt the truth of your answer its seems its more likely to be thrown in finally as a way of not losing the discussion. Anyway we all know its not the case that women have male nurses giving them intimate washes or touching their genitals in anyway. If it did happen that a male nurse was assigned to them even on a vaguely intimate task no one would get angry with them and call…
/r/MensRights24/05/18 11:46 AM
39

Yea good post but you can put this in your description of the original post. My questions for all the reddits here: What good does anonymity do some guy who is put in jail like this? What good is it for men's rights to sweep this under the carpet? Don't we want the public discussing this? Why should crimes against women be 10 times as important as crimes against men in the first place?
/r/MensRights24/05/18 10:28 AM
7

While its good that she's being charged and good that this is finding its way to media, the title of the article is very misleading. It makes it sound like she said you've a nice ass or something when in fact she tried to sexually assault him, she tried to perform oral sex on him.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 10:10 AM
1

I've never complained about the nurse assigned to me on the basis of their sex, race or any other inborn trait, and I think that people who do so are being incredibly disrespectful. Are you really this stupid or are you just being sly again. You don’t need to complain as male nurses aren’t doing intimate care of women, they’re not giving women baths they don’t have their hands on their genitals. Women choose their OB/GYNs. There are many female obstetricians, we don't select a male doctor out of…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 01:56 PM
0

How can you excuse severe sexual abuse of boys like this.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 09:07 PM
1

Because we're conditioned to believe women are good and can't be sexual abusers of boys. Believe it or not this case is progress.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 11:14 PM
0

While I think I agree with your comment forget the sarcasm and trying to be clever, not good if people don't know what your saying.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 11:13 PM
1

Its not even that normally its "I had to check if he wet himself" or they don't even have to say anything we can't conceive that women can sexually assault young boys.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 10:58 PM
1

I honestly could not tell you what percentage of women might object to having a male nurse. I don't think any research has been done on that. What I CAN tell you is that I have received excellent care from nurses of the opposite sex, and I find the notion of refusing care from a man just as ludicrous as refusing care from a black person. Bigots generally feel "disrespected" when society decides not to accommodate their bigotry any more. Nothing to be done about that, it's a self-correcting probl…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 10:54 PM
1

Not clear what at all your replying to anyway you're nonsense is completely irrelevant to the subject of this thread.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 10:06 PM
7

Yes use of the word paedophile is progress. The only reason this was uncovered was that these women are disabled, deaf and cut off from society and didn't know how to cover their paedophilia. Normally what women do is use a cover story that they were checking if a young boy wet himself and use it as an excuse to fondle his penis. Even without this cover story a woman would likely get away with it given society is so conditioned to believe a woman can't be a paedophile.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 11:00 AM
1

You're completely dishonest again of course its different if a doctor examines you. If its a doctor its more once off and not daily. By definition a doctor is a specialist, given there are less of them so there would be less choice about specialists. But even if what you said was true and not made up for the sake of winning an argument, this would be in a fraction of a percent of the cases. In almost all cases of routine care women would get female routine nurses men would almost always get wome…
/r/MensRights17/05/18 08:57 AM
0

Care providers meaning doctors not male nurses. And you're calling us snowflakes for insisting on what 98% of women take for granted and would be outraged if it were taken from them.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 10:26 PM
2

Should have objected a woman would have.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 10:23 PM
8

should have complained a woman would have.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 10:23 PM
0

So if you're not avoiding anything why not answer my question? Would you object to a male nurse examining your genitals or giving you a body wash?
/r/MensRights16/05/18 09:01 PM
1

As I said above trying to avoid the issue again. Having someone bring you dinner is different to someone intimately examining your genitals.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 05:20 PM
2

I have had several male nurses in the course of my various births and other hospitalizations. Because I am not a moron, I did not regard it as humiliating to be cared for by a member of the opposite sex. You're slyly trying to avoid the issue. Thanks for demonstrating your slyness, have you had male nurses examining your genitals? There's a difference between a nurse bringing you dinner and examining your genitals. Are you really this stupid I doubt it. Respect is a two-way street. Why not show …
/r/MensRights16/05/18 05:19 PM
8

There's nothing more obnoxious than a woman telling men they should put up with sexually humiliating treatment something these women would never put up themselves. Women would never settle for male nurses fiddling with their vaginas. There are more occasions where a nurse has to examine someone intimately for a doctors its usually a once off.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:40 PM
13

Would you accept a male nurse examining your vagina without the normal modesty gown. With your lower half bare and your legs open. Your arrogance defies belief that you would come on to a men's rights board and tell us we're completely arse-backwards for wanting some respect from the medical profession which women can take for granted.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 02:43 PM
4

Why wouldn't you have demanded a male nurse from the start?
/r/MensRights16/05/18 02:37 PM
8

Definitely we should start making an issue of it at hospitals. Lots of men deep down object to female nurses violating their privacy, problem is men would feel they shouldn't make fuss about their feelings especially their privacy they'd be made to feel petty and less masculine.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 02:36 PM
0

You misread my comment. I say we should be more concerned about women who play us against each other. The enemy is white knights.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 06:01 PM
1

Was once a nice guy.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 05:59 PM
9

Even here you're wrong if a man abused a boy he's treated as a criminal. It's where a woman abuses a boy nothing happens.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 09:58 AM
17

Stop being an idiot if a man abused girls he'd go to jail for a long time most guys would be baying for his blood wanting to lynch him. Don't know why we tolerate nonsense like this on the board.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 08:20 AM
14

Yea we need to give these sick old hags a taste of reality.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 08:13 AM
1

Nonsense like this should be banned from this subreddit. Who cares if some transgenders don't want you at your party its the women that play us against each other are the real enemy. Its women who play us against each other are the real issue, its women who can play the system against us or can play brother against brother.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 07:43 AM
-11

Nonsense like this should be banned from this subreddit. Who cares if some transgenders don't want you at your party its the women that play us against each other are the real enemy. Its women who play us against each other are the real issue, its women who can play the system against us or can play brother against brother.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 07:42 AM
1

They're hardly the enemy the enemy is female victimhood. Who cares if they don't allow you at a social event. Dumb posts like this just show how idiotic some of the posters here are.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 07:32 AM
1

Hence my point that this is cultural that the female all powerful victim card isn't inevitable.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 07:16 AM
2

Not that I'd want to stone any one to death but the fact that women in some Middle Eastern Countries demonstrate that we could have a society without the victim card. In fact in most of the 3rd world women have no where near the victim card they have in the West. Even 150 years ago a man could have beaten his wife if she was rude to him without any repercussions. The obsession with female victimhood has only happened in the last 200 years. Chivalry was in fact a way of protecting your property a…
/r/MensRights13/05/18 03:53 PM
20

While its good news what is far worse is women playing the victim. We should concentrate on destroying the victim card.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 08:03 AM
3

Great article and excellent analysis by Reven311 however we need to stop thinking these kind of stories are bad news, we need to start thinking tactically. If lots of guys like this aren't beholden to women and and are essentially alienated from society it'll mean good recruiting grounds for MRA's. It'll mean these men will demand fairness from society it'll mean they can't be blackmailed by being told what about your wife and daughter.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 12:43 PM
3

Think he has a sense that men should have more freedoms and not be straight jacketed by fears of not being masculine. He was ahead of the times in so many ways.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 06:35 PM
7

John no one even the most chivalrous whiteknight would defend this woman. All of society hates her. Surely we've better things to do than this, we must concentrate on those that play men against each other.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 10:43 AM
8

Whether women use the label or not is irrelevant most women aren't feminists but that doesn't mean they don't play men off against each other. Why are people hailing this as a victory? You notice she says "women have more opportunities than ever before" If she was honest she would say women's welfare is everywhere seen as ten times more important than men's.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 03:23 PM
2

Thanks I only had time to look at one of those videos, its horrifying. Couldn't contain myself to actually read all of its content.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 02:59 PM
1

Yes we're way behind that's my point it'll take 40 years before we've anything near equality. Thus in the meantime we need to be networking and helping each other. Why should we help whiteknights and gynocentrics who’re our worst enemy? Surely not if it takes being falsely accused and being burned by other whiteknights to wake whiteknights up then that’s what they need. In helping other men we need to help those with the most similar philosophy to us. I really, really hate whiteknights and gynoc…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 02:52 PM
1

I know you're not arguing against a support group but it was very meandering paragraph, difficult to understand and difficult to apply your metaphor of drilling a hole and what it mean for our support group but the final suggestion not having a support group summed up the pointlessness of this paragraph. We men tend to get to the point.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 02:35 PM
1

I agree the feminists have more integrity on this point.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 03:43 AM
5

Disgusting website I look forward to the day such sickos are arrested and sign on the sex offenders register.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 03:39 AM
1

Given you're answer the solution must be for us to form small core groups where we can at least help and support each other. And put less emphasis on helping those white knights who'll always be our enemy anyway.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 02:21 AM
1

Yea we need to organize at grass roots at first. I've found it helps to have a buddy MRA with whom I can arrange Men's Rights discussions. Two people on the same side can sway a larger group. This is one tangible area where we can expand. Any group who achieved anything had a grass roots following at the start. Problem is on this subreddit we don't have a profile, so we don't know what country the other guys are on. Is there a way of attaching profile information here? Where are you based?
/r/MensRights08/05/18 10:39 PM
1

But most guys now have realized feminism isn't their friend but haven't yet realized the traditional model which extols men attacking other men in defense of the womyn folk.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 09:37 PM
3

Well most men can spot them. But the traditional model of man is far more insidious. It expects men to man up and be the protector of women thus playing men off against each other. Problem is most men fall for this. Surely you being a Razorbladekandyfan understand this?
/r/MensRights08/05/18 09:24 PM
1

Good our fellow white males are our worst enemy anyway feeling they always have to white knight on behalf of the womynfolk.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 07:32 PM
7

Its far deeper and broader than feminism, our biggest enemy today are our fellow men.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 07:18 PM
1

When I said why don’t we let men decide what they need, it was in response to the people who plowed in to dictate how a group should operate with zero consideration for the people it was intended to help and little objective to help anyone at all. This conversation was such an opportunity to help men, and was rapidly derailed by people who only saw an opportunity to attack women, trampling all over men in the process. We did this. I would have liked to see discussion around things such as whethe…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 04:48 PM
1

Your correct. (Just kidding, yea I spotted it).
/r/MensRights06/05/18 01:13 PM
1

I should of course clarified with you what you were saying, Its not really your fault this is what I associate that phrase with, that's how I've seen it often used. You see most men are against MRA's this is all about emotions. Men want to feel strong they don't want to feel they're fighting for their rights against women. So a good way women have of silencing MRA's speaking out is to say ask men what they want. MRA subjects aren't discussed among most men and so they react against MRA's seeing …
/r/MensRights02/05/18 01:27 PM
2

No one has yet shown me where it says this is part of an initiative to stop sexual assault and domestic violence. I've deferred judgement until I see that information. First I don't agree with the statement that men shouldn't be "encouraged to fulfill traditional gender roles such as being successful" We should all be encouraged to give it our best shot as you put it. I can't understand how guy like you who're presumably concerned with men's rights can't see that this traditional model of mascul…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 10:56 PM
1

I found that comment "why don't you let them decide what they need" as indicating you weren't in favour of such a group. Often people use the phase "let men decide what they need" when you suggest some support for men. Its an effective way of silencing pro men support because men feel they're being cued to be manly and give support for who ever prompts. The problem is that if you let most guys decide on whether they needed such a group they'd say they don't need it. I noticed later that you gave…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 10:05 PM
0

Stupid an honest woman for a change she's far better than other women who manipulate us against each other.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 09:22 AM
1

It seems a waste of time answering your questions if you aren't going to read them. I'm trying to understand you're comments here they sound bizarre, you sound like a computer program. What age are you? Where are you from?
/r/MensRights30/04/18 12:50 PM
1

So is that a good thing?
/r/MensRights30/04/18 12:48 PM
1

Hopefully you would see that you're thick non thinking comments are an obstacle to progress in any discussions and you would self censor or hopefully some moderator would delete you.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 12:25 PM
1

You've no idea how think your responses are. Presumably you've never seen a woman raped either but that doesn't stop you believing its a serious issue. You don't hear about boys being sexually assaulted by women as society doesn't believe sex assaults by women are an important issue and women censor these discussion.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 12:24 PM
2

Yea the obsessive anger with feminism is destroying the whole debate. I believe the word should be banned from these discussions. The feminists I know are genuine about wanting equality for both sexes they're very forthright about what their issues with men but I believe that's a good thing. We've far more to be concerned about from those women who slyly play men off against each other and those traditional structures which encourage a dense, non thinking mentality in men. Their whole approach i…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 12:14 PM
1

Yes I've come across her past posts where she expressed support for male victims of sexual assault. I find her initiative genuine and very admirable.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 11:59 AM
1

How dare you come on here complaining about male victims of sexual assault having their own support group. Female victims of sex assaults dominate all of society surely its about time men had some support. What gender are you? You're a great example of why we need a support group specifically for men. You're on a men's rights board and you're crying about women victims not having representation. Female victims are far better at asserting their victimhood. Female victimhood dominates all of socie…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 11:57 AM
1

You're a great example of why we need a support group specifically for men. You're on a men's rights board and you're crying about women victims not having representation. Female victims are far better at asserting their victimhood. Female victimhood dominates all of society. If we allowed women the male victims would be drowned out by the female victims. And the men will automatically feel they have to side with women men have been so trained in being subservient to female victimhood and attack…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 11:55 AM
1

Excellent point. Women instinctively control the parameters of discussion and men are obliged "protect" women and attack other men at the behest of women.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 11:45 AM
1

You're question has been answered many times beat it bozo.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 11:38 AM
1

why don't you ask who what genius. If you're going to ask a question at least know what you're trying to say.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 11:37 AM
1

How are we becoming feminists? Please name some Rights organization which didn't have some core cohesive group. Any group supporting each other's rights and dignity has to be a bit cohesive and form a core group. If we have a men's convention are we like feminists. If we say the sky is blue are we like feminists. Stop throwing out silly comments without thinking of what you're saying.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 11:34 AM
1

Sorry but this subgroups sounds like a good idea why don't you leave it at that.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 11:31 AM
1

No most support women offer is illusory its more correct to call it manipulation.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 11:30 AM
7

Look if we're to get anywhere we'll have to do a bit better than scream feminist at every woman who tries to help us. I've followed BernieSandersGirl for a while she posted a lot of comments regarding her sympathy for male victim so the creation of such a group is in fitting with this.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 11:24 AM
30

You've made her an honorary man? Arise Sir BernieSandersgirl101.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 01:10 PM
2

runner557 I'm tried conversing with tenchineuro but he's either a troll or a computer program which can understand sentences at a very superficial level, and just creates a reply which is just some statement but not at all relevant to what is being discussed. No human could be that stupid. The issue sane members should have here is how do we get rid of crap like tenchineuro.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 01:07 PM
0

That's already happening. The state is reacting by shortening common law marriage, it will keep getting shorter and shorter, I'm saying we have to change the notion that men have to self sacrifice towards woman. Did you deliberately misinterpret my comment or are you really this stupid. Women expect that option and the state is happy to provide. can you stop throwing in irrelevant things in to the discussion. That's why hookups have replaced dating and relationships today. Even college men know …
/r/MensRights29/04/18 01:02 PM
1

The problem is not men's mindset, but the law. You can be positive as the state takes everything you've earned and gives it to the woman that divorced you, but why would you? Its both. At least changing the mindset of men will ensure other men won't take it so its going to be easier to change the law. Or maybe the execution. In practice that always seems to mean more for women. That's what I'm saying. So you acknowledge the problem, it's a start. Of course I'm acknowledging the problem you're no…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 12:55 PM
-2

What red flags? There are some good sign there, like it recognizes that we have a restrictive masculinity and that men are told to man up.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 12:48 PM
-1

First how do you know this is a feminist course? Any thought and discussion on this subject is good. This maybe an initiative organised by men and even if its by women its possible they genuinely have men's best interest at heart. That they believe always telling men to man up isn't good for men's health. They may believe that there are many double standards which work against men in society. We need a better approach than to just always snarl "feminism" at everything.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 11:46 AM
0

It's the law dude. And if you can't provide for yourself, the state is not going to do it if you are able-bodied and male, I don't think living on the street is a viable option, but YYMV. We at least have to start eroding the notion of self sacrifice. Don't think men or women should be looking for the state to support them. Sure, it's a simple matter to change the culture and hundreds of years of common law, right? No didn't say it was simple but nothing will happen without changing men's attitu…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 11:42 AM
1

Look its more important to change men's mindsets themselves first then real change will happen. The effectiveness of laws is in the interpretation. The sexes are supposedly equal under the law but in the interpretation and execution both are treated drastically different. If someone hit you in a bar and you reported it to police they'd arrest you for wasting time. If a woman was hit the CCTV would be on the nightly news. But supposedly the sexes are equal. And even if you don't agree that men's …
/r/MensRights29/04/18 11:25 AM
1

Given that women, and indeed the law demands breadwinning from the man, and welfare is generally not available for single able-bodied men, I don't see the upside of ignoring reality. Yeah, but it's a legal requirement and I don't think this class will change the law, it will just put men in a bad unsupported position. That's what they're trying to challenge. Most likely this position will be filled by a feminist, maybe with red hair. Obviously this idea depends on the execution but they at least…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 10:14 AM
1

Do you actually agree with the restrictive model of masculinity and that men always have to man up? When men have to do all the work they’re told to man up. When they get divorced and get kicked out of the family home and can’t see their kids they’re told to man up. When the get falsely accused and beaten by police they must man up. Man up is a way of tricking men in to accepting they’re second class citizens. Of all the things you could have a problem with an initiative designed to support men …
/r/MensRights29/04/18 10:08 AM
-4

John, Do you actually agree with the restrictive model of masculinity and that men always have to man up? When men have to do all the work they’re told to man up. When they get divorced and get kicked out of the family home and can’t see their kids they’re told to man up. When the get falsely accused and beaten by police they must man up. Man up is a way of tricking men in to accepting they’re second class citizens. Of all the things you could have a problem with an initiative designed to suppor…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 10:06 AM
1

John Kimble at least discussions like this bring it to the surface that there's an anti men sentiment today.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 08:07 AM
1

Well it looks like it is up to me to figure out what's going on in your brain. So you believe its the teacher that gropes boys and sleeps with them. So you believe that the fact that the teacher gropes boys and sleeps with them means that female baby sitters don't sexually assault young boys. Why should one mean the other can't happen?
/r/MensRights29/04/18 08:04 AM
1

Thanks for your question? But can you formulate your question properly its not up to me to figure out what's going on in your brain.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 04:37 PM
2

Those of us interested in promoting men's rights, its not in our interest to censor the subject or silencing the subject. Right is on our side.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 09:24 PM
3

If its the same as the UK does that make it OK?
/r/MensRights27/04/18 04:59 PM
10

Do you think they're going to hang female baby sitters who sexually grope boys?
/r/MensRights27/04/18 04:56 PM
6

Do you think they're going to hang female baby sitters who sexually grope boys?
/r/MensRights27/04/18 04:56 PM
1

We really don't care about labeling any group as a hate group. We don't want to censor feminists we've little to fear from them we should be pushing for open discussion. In fact it's not feminists are the true enemy its the white knights are our real enemy.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 04:52 PM
2

We really don't care about labeling any group as a hate group. We don't want to censor feminists we've little to fear from them we should be pushing for open discussion. In fact it's not feminists are the true enemy its the white knights are our real enemy.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 04:52 PM
1

Maybe but they still manipulate us against each other, they play brother against brother. In fact its the ones who profess to love men are the worst.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 04:49 PM
1

Better women say this explicitly rather than play men against each other. Most women are far worse than this at least she's being honest it allows us to address it.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 07:12 AM
4

Better women say this explicitly rather than play men against each other. Most women are far worse than this at least she's being honest it allows us to address it.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 07:12 AM
1

Better women say this explicitly rather than play men against each other. Most women are far worse than this at least she's being honest it allows us to address it.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 07:11 AM
1

No where is the double standard more prevalent that here. Imagine the outcry if actors were making jokes about kicking a woman in the vagina. Its tragic that a thread like this will only have a few comments and a thread on mansplaining will have 100's.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 08:44 PM
1

Anyone know who produced this?
/r/MensRights18/04/18 09:29 AM
1

No most men deeply feel women are more important than them they are so bombarded by quilt. That's why we have to ask such questions on message boards and talk radio: "Why are crimes against women 10 times more important than crimes against men" Just short pithy sentences. Avoid all the other stupid discussions like are women more important or why don't women want to date such and such a guy. Just keep it simple.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 07:30 PM
1

Where does she say women should stop playing the victim. This is the most dangerous think in society as it plays men off against each other.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 07:04 AM
1

Where does she say women should stop playing the victim. This is the most dangerous think in society as it plays men off against each other.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 07:03 AM
1

If a woman was attacked or hit the offender will get a tougher sentence? Obviously the judge might not be in your view a classical white knight but he still thinks women are twice or five times as important as men.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 06:39 AM
1

Its mostly chivalric white knight type men that are the first to attack other men if they appear to be anti women in any way. Obviously the majority of the police and legal system are men aren't they.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 07:00 PM
0

This guy the Thinkery is taking some easy opposition some idiot feminist in America who's a mind of little girl in a tantrum. No one likes girls like this feminist tantrum girl or this male feminist sociologist. If The Thinkery is serious how about taking on some real opposition like the all powerful beast female victimhood like the fact that everywhere we look a woman is ten times more important than a man. If a woman was hit in public CCTV would be on the nightly news if a man was hit he'd be …
/r/MensRights15/04/18 01:08 PM
1

What exactly is your counter argument? How does a woman groping men change/negate/validate a man doing it? I said you can't read because I never said women sexually assaulting men made it ok for men to sexually assault women. I said why should a woman be 20 times more important than a man. I mentioned about you're period flowing out of your mouth as you're enraged about any infringement on women but dismiss that of men. This is what's so frustrating to MRA's we're conditioned to see women as ten…
/r/MensRights15/04/18 09:43 AM
0

This is far broader than feminism the real danger is the growth of female victimism where men are more our enemy than anything. This idiot changing the subject to feminism doesn't help men at all.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 08:30 AM
2

I've posted links to discussions about nurses abusing men in hospitals before. My point here was they didn't even allow me to give a counter argument about women sexually groping men. And genius how am I supposed to link to articles about nurses abusing male patients if newspapers won't create articles on it or it doesn't even get recorded as sexual abuse. Only rarely if a man pushes it is it recorded as sex abuse. Don't know why you're so bitchy and nasty to everyone on the board.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 07:30 AM
1

The contesistential retard is just here to annoy people. The story WTFOMGBBQ describes is very believable women often talk about kicking guys in the nuts. Some guy asking to see screen shots before he believes you is just trying to annoy you. Hard to imagine this contexistential creature has any positive intention for this board. He/she should be banned.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 07:26 AM
2

Just because you're on your time of the month doesn't mean you shouldn't be able to read. He is definitely wrong. And you’re excusing it. Now I see. It’s totally ok that this male doctor molested his patients, because hypothetical women do it all the time. You need to learn to read. Where did I say it was ok for him to molest his patients. I'm pointing out the fact that we automatically think women are 10 times more important than men. Just like you claiming to be pro men's rights but you're per…
/r/MensRights14/04/18 07:14 AM
2

Thank you for a very informative post, which we'd more like this. I'm not in the US.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 07:11 AM
3

Sex with a child? Surely that was a crime? I've read the article many times to try and make sense of it. How could she be guilty of child sexually abusive material but not a sex act with a child. However, Pacyga was found guilty of producing child sexually abusive material. That charge normally has a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison, but Pacyga's habitual offender status bumps that up to 30 years. And she wasn't sentenced yet. That's the potential sentence she could get.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 08:05 PM
14

Yes but women will change their mind where and when it suits them and the law has to side with them as their permanent victims.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 08:00 PM
3

What are you doing on a men's rights board asshole. Why should women be able to abuse men?
/r/MensRights13/04/18 07:59 PM
7

Rights are about relativity if one group is held to high standards the other should be also. People would automatically make excuses for female nurses but they don't do that for a doctor.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 06:17 PM
8

How did she get off of the charge of sexual abuse? Can anyone explain that. This revolting creature should be euthanized.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 06:09 PM
1

Yes but the problem isn't so much the women but the system who allow this to happen, mostly I would add populated by men. Men are their own worst enemy.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 06:07 PM
3

Yes but a woman can destroy your life at any moment by playing the victim.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 04:47 PM
1

We all know this genius you're wasting peoples time by saying something so obvious hence by question to you. Are you under 10 which is the only explanation for such a silly statement.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 03:18 PM
0

What's that supposed to be if you'd make such a dumb reply and don't care about men's rights why not go somewhere else?
/r/MensRights13/04/18 02:57 PM
0

Wasn't that his point? What age are you?
/r/MensRights13/04/18 02:04 PM
5

The real enemy is female victimism not feminism.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 09:33 PM
3

Yea dumb thread what has this game to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 03:24 PM
2

Yea I should give you more credit for noting that the media is a major factor in guilt tripping men most MRA’s don’t even see that. But I disagree with your comment on feminism it’s way overrated as a factor in this anti male environment. The traditional model of men holds that men should man up, protect women and provide for women. Traditional man wants to hold men to these traditional responsibilities but not daring to question any of the gains women have made. It’s not like any would dare to …
/r/MensRights06/04/18 11:04 PM
0

I agree with most of what you have to say here but its not feminism so much as the media and culture that has pushed male guilt and men being protective towards women. In fact we've much more to fear from the traditional model of men than feminism.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 09:40 AM
1

I'll answer your questions again please read a number of times before you comment. If we had equal rights from the get go we wouldn't have to have these threads... or groups called Men and Woman's rights. Obviously but we don't hence the need for this subreddit. What exactly is your point? Women are not seen as "more important." At the very least I've never heard any gender/sex say as much personally- not that it doesn't exist but I don't think it's a huge issue. We don't say so explicitly. I'm …
/r/MensRights05/04/18 07:28 AM
1

Obviously men and women should have equal rights from the get go. We know why things are like that, why women are seen as more important. Anyway that isn't key. Controversy is good notice anytime a popular figure is accused there's a lot of discussion and a lot of men wake up. When guys see woman saying they hate men it helps wake them up.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 05:16 PM
3

Its mostly just to counter act the burgeoning push back from men and not wanting this to go grow any further. Yea I'm sure the officers will still believe women. This is far deeper than police practice its a cultural thing that we tend to believe women are right men are wrong, women are good, men bad. And even if they were genuine about not automatically believing sex complaints. Why should be treat crimes against women as ten times more important than men. Would police car about a woman grabbin…
/r/MensRights03/04/18 05:10 PM
1

BoringHair1 Its childish to delete your comment just because someone disagrees with it. Argue your point.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 05:06 PM
1

Imagine jokes about kicking a woman in the vagina we'd never hear the end of it. Also in work I find it sly women can make jokes constantly about penises but men can't make jokes about vaginas.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 08:32 AM
1

Seafood is tasty and healthy.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 09:10 PM
1

I'm not talking about 14 year old victims I'm talking about 4 year old victims. Have you got around to recognising that women can sexually abuse 4 year old boys?
/r/MensRights01/04/18 07:53 PM
2

At least we recognize that women can have sex with 15 year old boys. But we haven't even got to the stage where we recognize women can sexually grope small boys. Women regularly sexually grope young boys they're babysitting and cover it up with excuses they're checking the boy needs changing or something else or excuses of female moral superiority. there is no area where there's such a discrepancy in the treatment of the sexes than in female pedophiles where the victim is a young boy.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 06:30 PM
1

Exactly Consilio, but most on here want to help them do that sweep this issue under the rug. We're not going to get anywhere with Men's Rights if we can't first persuade those well meaning Men's Rights Advocates here. Please help me persuade them that their actions are counter productive for men. Questions to ask are: Why should a crime against a woman be considered ten times as important as a crime against a man? Was the publicity surrounding this controversy good for men's rights?
/r/MensRights31/03/18 03:17 PM
1

furchfur, Do you believe this controversy has been good for men's rights.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 03:07 PM
2

Thanks.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 02:59 PM
2

Ok next time there's a discussion about anonymity for defendants join in with me saying that why should women be ten times more important than men. Why do we want anonymity why do we want this treatment of men swept under the carpet. False accusations are the best weapon in our arsenal.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 07:45 PM
1

Or its a deeper cultural thing that any sexual abuse of boys well thats cultural sex abuse of girls is 20 times worse.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 07:42 PM
1

Did you read the article this is sexual humiliation verging on sexual abuse. This very different to a clinical setting in a hospital.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 07:41 PM
-2

Dozey why beat up some guy for offending the women folk. We must give up thinking women are ten times more important than men.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 01:48 PM
6

Thanks one of the most incisive comments I've come across on reddit. We do have to look at our psychology and how male identity is formed rather than charging off against at something or someone. We do have to understand the bigger picture of how all this fits together.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 01:20 PM
-4

Did you just hear about falsely accused men and figure out innocent men were being jailed and we men had to do something about it. LoL Did you get mommy's permission before you used the puter. The top comment, I think we're fucked if this is the top comment. Men need to be united? even MRA's on this board aren't united. Men need to be united? That would be wonderful genius but we are fighting men, not feminists not women. The police, the government and the legal system are all men. Even the guys…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 01:14 PM
2

Glad to hear this false allegation did't get anywhere. But why bother to convict a guy accused of rape time we stopped treating women as ten times as important as men.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 08:16 AM
1

Thanks for your clarification of the laws but I still believe in freedom to have male or female clubs. Of course I know male only clubs wouldn't get away with it but concentrating on this I believe isn't important wouldn't be much of a victory. It allows the system to pretend things are fair where there are massive discrepancies in the way both sexes are treated.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 08:13 AM
1

Challenging these women-only clubs is stupid. We're just playing within their rules as if it a victory for us.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 08:08 AM
2

Yea I agree people should have the right to associate with who they want. Men should have that right too needless to say. This is a very hollow victory, they're doing this to pretend oh society isn't prejudiced towards men.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 08:06 AM
1

Why do we want to sweep this anti men sentiment under the carpet where men never see what's going on. Truth is on our side we want men to see how bad it is.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 09:22 PM
2

I agree why do we want to sweep this anti men sentiment under the carpet where men never see what's going on. Truth is on our side we want men to see how bad it is.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 09:21 PM
1

Why do we want to sweep this under the carpet. Right is on our side we want men to know how precarious their position in society is. When guys see their heroes have fallen it upsets them and makes them see how anti men the system can be.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 09:20 PM
4

Women only clubs should be allowed just like Men only clubs. People should have the right to associate with who they want to. Trouble is women will whine about misogyny if women aren't allowed in and the men will be terrified and run for cover. Men need to stop being afraid of the misogyny label.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 09:11 PM
5

Women only clubs should be allowed just like Men only clubs. People should have the right to associate with who they want to. Trouble is women will whine about misogyny if women aren't allowed in and the men will be terrified and run for cover. Men need to stop being afraid of the misogyny label.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 09:11 PM
1

Problem is we can't bring them in with just words, Western culture is so trained in the nurturing instinct towards women we can't see the injustice towards men. We can't feel the injustice of this guy bullied by the system we're just trained to get angry with him. Sorry we won't just logically wake men up by explaining to them. Men have to experience this aggression by the state or see a friend experience it to awake to how bad it is. Even you who've found your way to this board have little idea…
/r/MensRights29/03/18 08:39 PM
2

Sorry to hear you were falsely accused however I was awakened to what was going on without being falsely accused, I was waiting WTF is wrong with all the other guys can't they see what's really going on. Hopefully a lot of other guys can see what happens to these high profile players to see what's going on without having being falsely accused. Its better it happens to one famous athlete than to 20 ordinary guys these cases are swept under the carpet. I wish it wasn't necessary for another guy to…
/r/MensRights29/03/18 08:07 PM
8

Dozey he's not supporting men's rights he just want to sweep this under the carpet. We need the public to know what's going on that's the only thing that wakes men up to how precarious their position in society is.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 02:16 PM
0

Maybe but ultimately we want to wake men up to how precarious their situation in Western countries is. Do we want this bullying of men to be swept under the carpet. Men themselves are their own worst enemies we have to be more practical and tactical. We have to stop thinking we support all men we must focus on attention on supporting MRA's. We certainly don't need to support sporting heroes who invariably decry us as misogynistic or losers given they're insulated form the real world surrounded b…
/r/MensRights29/03/18 02:10 PM
29

John why do we want anonymity we want the public to know whats going on. We have to start addressing the fact that Western values are sick to the core. Why should the welfare of women be ten times as important as men in the first place? Why are crimes against women treated as ten times as important as crimes against men.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 09:29 AM
4

Yea I understand that they're mutilated in the West but not in such a barbaric way and the group sexual humiliation of this makes it far worse.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 09:18 AM
3

I meant it rhetorically obviously I know its because they're boys but in a way the Western media is just as as complicit in this by ignoring this.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 09:15 AM
2

The key thing is that we need to reject the female victim card. Western society is now meant to be based on equal rights under the law. Complicating this unnecessarily just distracts us from our key goals.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 12:53 AM
56

Why aren't Western Media outlets decrying the mast sexual mutilation of these boys in particular the barbaric nature of this ritual. Its made worse by the fact of the women sexually humiliating these boys.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 12:49 AM
1

If someone hates you, you can avoid them, believe me their are lots of people in the world that hate you ..... and I. What's the greatest danger to you is someone who is able to play your brother against you in which case they won't come with a warning sign that they hate men. In fact we should welcome women who openly declare their hatred of men, they wake men up.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 11:02 PM
1

Yes I agree but in order to do so they're must be a drastic realization that there's something disastrously wrong in society, that there's a massive imbalance in how the welfare is treated. Men themselves are their own worst enemies so they need to be persuaded first. Hence such high profile cases are critical to us in opening me's minds to this. Men are far more likely to be on the side of a famous sports star than some guy branded a rapist and hence they'll will have their eyes opened about ho…
/r/MensRights28/03/18 10:39 PM
2

But you said you agreed with my previous comment. Obviously I understand the argument about the defendant should have anonymity if the accuser does. But cases like this are like gold dust to us. Men have to know how anti men the system really is, many will only be awakened by the plight of their friends or heroes when they're accused. Even more important such players are usually the biggest white knights and are the first to attack Men's Rights Advocates as misogynistic or losers. Such men are i…
/r/MensRights28/03/18 09:59 PM
1

It just shows how far we've to go. The idiot poster thinks because a woman says she likes men she's ok and if she says she hates men she's the enemy. Its the women who play men off against each other are the main enemy and they won't hold a "I hate men sign". Its important for us to start using our brain if we've to get anywhere.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 08:42 PM
1

Yea, It just shows how far we've to go. The idiot poster thinks because a woman says she likes men she's ok and if she says she hates men she's the enemy. Its the women who play men off against each other are the main enemy and they won't hold a "I hate men sign". Its important for us to start using our brain if we've to get anywhere.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 08:41 PM
0

It just shows how far we've to go. The idiot poster thinks because a woman says she likes men she's ok and if she says she hates men she's the enemy. Its the women who play men off against each other are the main enemy and they won't hold a "I hate men sign". Its important for us to start using our brain if we've to get anywhere.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 08:40 PM
1

It just shows how far we've to go. The idiot poster thinks because a woman says she likes men she's ok and if she says she hates men she's the enemy. Its the women who play men off against each other are the main enemy and they won't hold a "I hate men sign". Its important for us to start using our brain if we've to get anywhere.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 08:33 PM
1

Do you think its a good thing that newspapers are covering this?
/r/MensRights28/03/18 08:01 PM
1

But advocating for tougher laws for guys who grope women than the other way around you are supporting that. You don't have to explicitly state something to support it. Are you an advocate of men's rights.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 07:19 PM
3

I don't expect these well connected rugby players got the same bullying from the police, general police bullying also being a form of punishment for men and a way of keeping us in line. The police know they'll be treated as heroes for bullying men who're deemed misogynists, the public will say their heart is in the right place anyway. And cases like this out in the public eye are invaluable publicity to us it wakes Joe Public to the fact that men are in a very precarious position today. It's mor…
/r/MensRights28/03/18 06:52 PM
9

furchfur, It likely would have been taken even if they weren't famous. The common an would have been treated far worse by the police given they don't have access to financial resources and the same powerful connections.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 05:35 PM
3

Does anyone know what this crap is about??
/r/MensRights26/03/18 12:10 PM
8

Fine but we should be more concerned about the states aggression towards men. Men have a choice about smoking not about the states anti men stance. Many men commit suicide because the state is anti men.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 12:09 PM
2

Female victimhood is the enemy not progressive feminism who just want women to be as good or better than men. We must stop talking about feminism and realise this is much deeper and broader than that. On this board we're completely sidetracked by feminism firstly there are far different types of feminism some are progressive some just openly hate men but the real dangerous type is victim feminism. We won't get anywhere until we identify who the enemy is "female victimhood".
/r/MensRights25/03/18 07:24 PM
1

Because why should women's victimhood be ten times more important than men's.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 07:17 PM
4

These tricks and blackmail against men are built in to the system, they've evolved over a long period to extract the most from men.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 07:16 PM
0

Is putting your hand on a woman's crotch, who you don't know, in a night club worse than punching a guy and bloodying him.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 12:07 PM
2

Thanks hankrila you beat me too it. We're obsessed with female victimhood but don't care about men. Objectively a sex assault on a woman is relatively minor compared to a man being beaten unconscious, but we see it as ten times worse given our obsession with women's welfare.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 12:05 PM
1

This case appears to be ongoing I haven't followed it. Even if he's found innocent I doubt she pays the money back. But the money isn't the key thing the key thing for us is why is a woman ten times more important than a man always in Western Society. A man is a hero if he beats a guy unconscious but if it puts he's hand on someone's crotch then he's a pariah for the rest of his life. Female victimhood is out of control.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 12:01 PM
7

We need to stop playing to their victim card. If man was beaten unconscious his attacker might get 6 months but if a woman's raped its treated like the end of her life and the man gets 8 years and is a pariah for the rest of his life. Its time to give up in women's victimhood, rape is just sex its not like she was beaten unconscious.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 11:26 PM
1

Why are you on this Sub?
/r/MensRights21/03/18 10:29 PM
1

They need to become one with their haggyness and not use the foreskins of infant boys. That article treats it as if it was nothing a cream made from plant oil. If this was a just world such vain women would be pilloried. They feel no shame for what they're doing, they're almost proud of it.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 10:07 PM
1

This is really sick. Like soul-crushingly sick. If you didn't know the reality of women yes it is, but on the good side you've been awakened so some good came out of it.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 11:24 AM
2

Yea this is the best article I've read in a while. Doubt I've seen any man write an article as aware as that.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 08:56 AM
3

Yes because society is in denial about women sexually assaulting men or you'd be belittled if you accused a woman of sexually assaulting you.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 12:26 AM
-2

Well bozo its one of the first sites to write articles like this discussing that girls can sexually assault boys. What other articles discuss things like this.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 11:59 PM
1

WTF why would that help me??
/r/MensRights18/03/18 11:26 PM
1

Ye need to get it licked. No nothing against you I've a taste for clam juice too.
/r/MGTOW18/03/18 10:08 PM
4

I believe its a big step to have these sex assaults on boys recognized. Other than this comment about girls bearing the brunt of sex assaults its an excellent article.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 10:02 PM
2

Yea I see your point but she may have had to make a caveat to get the article published. Its a big step to have this subject discussed in the first place.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 09:59 PM
6

Nowhere is the discrepancy between the rights of male and female more pronounced than in the case of sexual assault. Any sexual assault of a woman is treated as all important it would be a life changing event for a man accused but if man is sexually assaulted by a woman its treated as the most trivial thing. He’d be belittled if he brought it up. Society seems to believe girls are free to violate boys. Boys will feel as if there’s something wrong with them if they object. Most boys feel they hav…
/r/MensRights18/03/18 09:57 PM
1

Dumbass, The system will continue to shaft men as long as we put up with it. If they realize a significant percent of men are angry they'll do something about it.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 05:45 PM
1

Hotrod He's afraid of what people will think of his posts. He could have his life destroyed by a woman at anytime but he's afraid of people knowing he's angry about it.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 05:43 PM
0

But "we" - whoever "we" may be, and that is not well-defined on here I think you know "we" means men who're interested in advancing men's rights. should also be aware of who else reads what is written on here and what conclusions they might draw from it. Exactly my point you're a coward.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 03:04 PM
0

You're pretty stupid if you think this is ok. You know very well a woman wouldn't be treated anyway as bad as this man would hence its on a Men's Rights sub. And you've got something seriously wrong with you if you'd laugh at an incident like this.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 02:57 PM
3

Surely having female guards watching male prisoners forced to be naked is sexual abuse. They should be charged for this.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 01:42 PM
-2

ThirdTurnip you're missing the whole point of this. This woman wasn't abused by staff and certainly wasn't sexually abused.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 01:38 PM
0

Yea, but we should be grateful that its being reported at all.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 12:55 PM
1

Some good links there William but the tone of your whole post is almost apologetic. We have to have more confidence in ourselves if we want to get anywhere. Why should women be ten times more important than men in the first place? Why should women be able to destroy a man's life on a whim?
/r/MensRights18/03/18 12:21 PM
7

Imagine if Hollywood men were getting bits of baby girls genitals put on their face for vanity. How sick and pathetic would that be. These old hags should be boycotted.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 10:26 AM
1

Imagine if Hollywood men were getting bits of baby girls genitals put on their face for vanity. How sick and pathetic would that be. These old hags should be boycotted.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 10:26 AM
1

Not sure why we care about this idiot.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 10:24 AM
1

I haven't used it except to clarify what another poster meant.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 07:50 PM
1

Very silly but hardly anything to do with Men's rights.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 07:49 PM
1

I agree that its more so societal expectations on men are toxic. I was clarifying what a previous poster was saying I was just disappointed that this whole thread got hijacked by a discussion on whether men should be traditional macho types who defend the homeland or more progressive who demand that society recognize that men have to be treated fairly as well. Its looking like discussion is impossible on the board members read what they want in to other peoples comments and attack a strawman.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 01:37 PM
1

But talking about "Toxic masculinity is the societal expectation that a man should be manly" he's talking about the insistence that men should man up when they're attacked. In the past men were prepared to accept more hardship than women given women were in a more vulnerable position. Men risked their lives both in work and war as in those days women couldn't destroy mens lives with false accusations. They wouldn't have risked their lives in toil or war if the society was so anti men as it is no…
/r/MensRights11/03/18 11:15 PM
1

Not that we need links to state the obvious. Spousal Abuse in 14th Century Yorkshire. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/flor/article/viewFile/14446/20238 3rd world countries are indicative of what attitudes would have been like in a few generations ago. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/11/world/africa/entrenched-epidemic-wifebeatings-in-africa.html If women are stoned in some Muslim countries on a judgement of their own legal system how does that fit with your idea that men are naturally prote…
/r/MensRights09/03/18 11:49 AM
1

Wife-beating was both widely tolerated and sanctioned by law in 18th-century England. Yet the ordeal suffered by Mary Eleanor Bowes, Countess of Strathmore, at the hands of her husband so shocked Georgian sensibilities that she not only won landmark legal battles but her husband was banished to prison. Marital violence is as old as marriage itself. In Georgian England, husbands were legally entitled to strike their wives in order to ‘correct’ their conduct so long as moderation was the watchword…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:21 PM
9

Sounds good but it all depends on the implementation. Will it just stress and appreciate our role to be the protectors and defenders of women. If we're the protectors of women women have great power to play us off against each other. At best it'll talk about health and homelessness which are important but it won't talk about the fact that the state itself is the main enemy of men. It won't talk about the fact that a crime against a woman is ten times more important than a man, a crime against a …
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:00 PM
1

Can you tell me why you're calling me a feminist? All I said was we need to form networks and ensure good communication. How should that make me a feminist?
/r/MensRights08/03/18 02:27 PM
-15

I believe we should all express our support for female equality in the ways women were disadvantaged almost always in the past. Thus we're able to demand equal treatment in the way we're disadvantaged.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 12:05 PM
1

Not that you need this you know very well historically men often beat their wives confirming that we weren't in the past obsessed with female victimhood as we are now. Don't know why you're playing stupid. This reference here is from 1850 which is relatively recent 500 years ago it would have been far worse than this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_violence#History Prior to the mid-1800s, most legal systems viewed wife beating as a valid exercise of a husband's authority over his wife.[3…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 12:01 PM
1

Think you're just trying to frustrate now. From the 50's time magazine is that a feminist website. ‘The periods of violent behavior by the husband,’ the doctors observed, ‘served to release him momentarily from his anxiety about his ineffectiveness as a man, while giving his wife apparent masochistic gratification and helping probably to deal with the guilt arising from the intense hostility expressed in her controlling, castrating behavior.’ Where are your links and the extract that prove the p…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 11:51 AM
1

Well just a few.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 11:14 PM
1

Where does it talk about flogging a man who hit his wife. So do I order the book and read it all when it arrives in 2 weeks. Caught our as a fraud once again. Look there's plenty of links to demonstrate we weren't obsessed with female victimhood and that men could hit women routinely. http://www.historyofwomen.org/wifebeating.html During the 1800s wife beating was extremely common and only caused outrage if it was exceptionally brutal or endangered life.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 11:14 PM
1

Dishonest about what???
/r/MensRights07/03/18 11:07 PM
0

Give me a source for that please?
/r/MensRights07/03/18 01:54 PM
-5

He's giving her the finger test, not sure if she past. ;) As an officer I always give the ladies the finger test first.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 12:12 PM
-11

Looks like she's enjoying a good fingering, maybe the officer needs to write the latest foreplay book. Honestly lets give up on women's victim card.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 12:06 PM
0

Look brainless a man could have hit his wife if he felt like it and know one would have cared. So it was very different times to now. Now we're obsessed with guilt and women's victimhood. Obviously these are very different times. Are you saying you can't see the difference between now and 100 years ago.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 10:51 AM
0

But saying we should organise and support each other I'm behaving like a feminist. Every group that is successful has to do this. Can you switch your brain on before you come here or fuck off.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 10:49 AM
1

I never said Hollywood wasn't corrupt. I've said many times my main issue is the comments of the public at large. They were outraged at Roman Polanski and still are 15 years later. But they see what happened to this guy as a joke.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 10:48 AM
1

While I don't know much about this feminist we should recognize that some feminists are far more honest than most women. Feminists aren't automatically the enemy.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 12:29 AM
1

While I don't know much about this feminist we should recognize that some feminists are far more honest than most women. Feminists aren't automatically the enemy.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 12:28 AM
1

100 years ago, women were literally dependent on men, and we protected them. It was a symbiotic relationship that ensured the survival of the species. Now women are not dependent on men, but we still protect them. We will continue to protect them, because that's hardwired. there's a difference between helping women who're genuinely in need of help and being obsessed with female victimhood like today. Why for instance should an assault on women being 10 times more serious than an assault on a man…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 12:26 AM
1

I read about guys being charged for drugging instants every day in the newspapers. I haven't heard of male actors drugging teenage women. This woman may yet be charged but its the comments of the common people that bothered me that he should be happy with it.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 12:18 AM
1

We protected women in practical way so they could pop out babies out of their fannies but we didn't allow ourselves to be subservient to their victimhood. A man could easily have hit his wife and not have repercussions not that you should hit your wife. A women couldn't just go to the police station and have him thrown out of his own home. Women couldn't have treated men like dirt or humiliated them like they do today.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 12:16 AM
1

Yes Rethgil, but maybe its good that they're being honest for a change might wake up a few people.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 10:17 AM
0

Looks like you're just new to this. The discrimination is far deeper and wider than admission price to bars. Lots of men are kicked out of their own houses on the world of a woman, issues of admission price are trivial by comparison. Oh and can you get a proper name so we can remember you if you're serious about coming on this board.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 02:07 PM
3

Not really a men's rights issue can't really blame Angelian Jolie for this.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 02:04 PM
3

Yea we know that but its not reallly the point the point is women's victimhood seems to be the deciding factor in society these days especially in the area of bodily privacy.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 02:02 PM
2

Idiocy women's victimhood seems to be the overall driving force in everything. Now where is this more prevalent than in privacy. No where is the discrepancy in rights between the sexes than in privacy, no one would care about the privacy of men, in fact women get angered when men ask for bodily privacy, they've no problem invading men's changing rooms but would be looking for police to be involved if men did the same.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 02:00 PM
1

Most of these guys won't think unless we're forced to think.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 11:25 AM
1

Oxygen Thief.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 10:35 AM
1

Me neither but if it changes my enemies mind its not all bad.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 10:33 AM
1

Have you run out of cute 12 year old comments.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 12:10 AM
0

He's argues for chivalry and white knightism so he's an anti. Its the worst type of anti as its packaged as being pro men. This is MRA 101. Some times you have to be blunt to get the point across so saying he's the enemy is as clear as it gets. You appear to be about being cute and clever. We're here to communicate on different ways of helping men's rights if you aren't interested get lost.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 12:10 AM
1

You're on a men's rights board arguing about "religion". Can you stop trying to be clever and cryptic that's a bit 12 years old.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 12:02 AM
1

Maybe there is a real physical world What are you on about????? Try and make sense on here. The fact is Piers is the worst type of anti. And anti who pretends to be supportive of men.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 12:00 AM
1

You're on a Mens rights board so you're in identity politics genius.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 11:57 PM
1

Yea I regularly tell women to woman up or man up you're not a child. More guys have to start telling them this.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 11:55 PM
0

It can be alot worse than that, when expressed in the form of white knightism its hate. Men keep themselves in line. We have to recognise who our real enemy is.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 11:50 PM
1

If women are going to always win what are you doing here?
/r/MensRights03/03/18 11:47 PM
1

This is an MRA board so we don't support people who aren't on our side. Don't know whats so hard to understand about that.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 11:44 PM
1

Well I was saying they like pretending to be laddish but their really doing it with in the parameters women set for them. They like to appear to be assertive and not afraid to challenge women but are in actual fact as you say white knights. What part of England are you?
/r/MensRights03/03/18 11:39 PM
5

Its amazing the amount of guys her feel they have to protect all men. They fail to realize that these white knights are the biggest enemy of all. A white knight might be a neighbor in your street or in a bar. But often its the white knights in the police or the legal system that do the most damage. If white knights realized they weren't the moral heroes they thought they were but were in danger it would give them pause for thought from their phony moralizing. This is the biggest switch in MRA's …
/r/MensRights03/03/18 09:42 PM
4

Because when it happens to men it doesn't matter its only an issue when it happens to women. Sarcasm of course.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 09:08 PM
1

If a white knight who attacks men when he has the chance suddenly gets accused of something either hitting or sexually assaulting a woman is that a good thing?
/r/MensRights03/03/18 09:01 PM
2

You have to think more tactically. You have to realise that men aren't getting very far we've made slight gains in the last 30 years. If guys don't see the bullying that goes on behind the scenes then this won't sway them. They have to see the attack on a friend or experience it themselves before they wake up.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 09:00 PM
3

LOL or his girlfriend. Problem is there's a lot of truth in this. Most guys especially English guys like being laddish or asserting himself but ultimately they're being manipulated by their girlfriends to say whatever they say. Like here Piers is pretending to be assertive but he knows he's following a path preapproved by women.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 08:55 PM
6

You replying to me?
/r/MensRights03/03/18 07:06 PM
-4

No "Hell" is someone like Pliars Morgan moralizing.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 05:52 PM
2

I hope no one thinks Piers Morgan is on our side. I agree with the woman in this instance its would be good to open doors for people but not chivalry. I've respect for a woman who doesn't want to be seen as a damsel but wants to get a head professionally. If a woman is attacked I hope a man helps her but I hope he'd also help a lowly man.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 05:51 PM
2

Well true some of us didn't need to have bad things happen to us to be redpilled but we're the few on a men's rights board what about the 99% of men who aren't on a men's rights board and who attack/belittle us if you bring up the issue of men's rights. They need something to shock them. Notice how when a guy is accused of rape him and most of his friends suddenly awake. Is that such a bad thing?
/r/MensRights03/03/18 04:25 PM
-4

Problem is they won't be redpilled until they or some man they know is falsely accused otherwise on cue they'll direct their hatred to an accused man. I hate to say it but most men are our enemies until they change so why should I care about my enemy. Its natural for women to stick up for their own side its natural for men to want to stick up for their side but instead they attack men who stick up for men. Armies of old have always had a special hatred for those who betrayed their own side. Trai…
/r/MensRights03/03/18 03:46 PM
-13

Some men hate other men they've been encouraged to do so in society. So when they hear of a man who does "bad thing to a woman" they want to attack him or they want the state to put him behind for a long time. So why wouldn't I want such an enemy to be falsely accused by a woman so that he'll know things aren't so simple.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 02:54 PM
-43

Maybe this is good, it wakes up a few men, if it takes physical violence to wake some men that's what it takes.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 02:09 PM
5

Amazing he has to launch a legal bid just to uncover their names but great that men have started taking legal action. We need to start taking legal action to get anywhere.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 09:46 AM
1

Thanks for the link John but what this eg shows is that the real enemy isn't feminism but female victimhood.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 09:27 AM
2

He probably went public himself which lends credence to his story.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 09:22 AM
2

Yes it would be great if they would press charges even Weinstein didn't drug women. We should capitalize on this discussing it on other sites.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 09:20 AM
1

People are up in arms about Roman Polanski but the say this man should man up. You give the one in a thousand counter eg indicating that you're an anti. I'm angry as this sub gets no where because of 9 year olds or clever antis.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 09:11 AM
0

Thanks. Have you a link?
/r/MensRights03/03/18 09:07 AM
2

Well she deserves a fair trial then she needs to be impaled with a stake up her twat Vlad Tepes style.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 09:06 AM
6

Yea that's what I'm saying most men would want to kill the man who who would so such a thing to a girl but then if it happens to a man tell him to man up. Most men seem to be our worst enemy. Which is why we're not fighting for all men we're fighting for a small core of enlightened men who demand not beg for equality. We must network for such men and mutually support each other against the aggression of the state any may be support each other business wise.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 09:00 AM
1

Doubt we need to fight for equality for women, the whole of society is geared around women's rights so don't march for them. Its much deeper than you're making out the West makes men want to man up and it belittles men marching for Men's Rights, so that's precisely what we must do. We must get over these mental barriers. This is not about us begging for equality as society looks down on men who beg, its about us being stronger forming networks with other strong MRA's and supporting them. Let soc…
/r/MensRights03/03/18 08:55 AM
3

Thanks for that. This is an effective way for antis to operate just make a few carefully chosen posts and everyone argue about that instead. But we have to start addressing antis. I've noticed those two shit post quite a bit they're either antis or they may be under 9 (chronologically or mentally). If the board is sinking in 9 year old posts we're not getting anywhere. Is there away of requiring people to give some profile information. Or we should require new members to only make a few posts a …
/r/MensRights03/03/18 08:44 AM
1

OK I take you're point. But some core MRAs have formed since then. This core needs to be much clearer on what it is and what its goals are but at least something has formed. This is the most difficult stage given the powerful chains on Western Men that require us to man up. Women will not save us men will but its going to take a long time yet. The real answer is to form networks of real MRA's who support each other if they run fowl of the laws let the other men who're mostly antis get screwed an…
/r/MensRights03/03/18 08:37 AM
3

Its seems female victimhood is the over riding factor an ugly over weight female will still be treated far better than a handsome man.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 11:20 PM
3

Well their consistent in that they consistently treat men very harshly for these crimes and treat women leniently. Most especially the men would agree with this treatment another reason why we must start networking with other MRA's and help genuine MRA's. We seem to be the enemy of most men even some on this board, look at the state of this thread for example.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 10:20 PM
4

One last time this was mean't to be a thread about Jaime Luner not Roman Polanski. By derailing important threads you're preventing MRA's from making progress. If you care about Men's Rights take a couple of years off from posting and just read.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 10:06 PM
-2

Crap its just today we're obsessed with women's victimhood.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 10:02 PM
2

Very good technique though I personally think both men and women should leave an abusive relationship. But good idea for flyers, might drop some on the subject of "women's victimhood is dangerous."
/r/MensRights02/03/18 09:59 PM
3

yes but she drugged him.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 09:56 PM
5

But these are seen as serious when Jaime Luner does so its not seen as so.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 09:43 PM
16

This is a thread about Jaime Luner not Roman Polanski.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 09:40 PM
10

There were specific reasons why Polanski wasn't charged one of those reasons is he's not in America. In 999 cases out of 1000 the man would be charged but you choose to give the 1 in a 1,000 case where he's not charged. And he's criticized constantly in the media no one would say his victim was lucky. Make another thread on Polanski but don't destroy this thread. If you're on the same side start acting like it.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 09:28 PM
1

Not sure its really the best way given most men are believe they should man up. So they'll likely scoff (at best) at MRA's marching for equality. What we need to be doing is networking, ensuring good clear communication so we're all ways learning and helping fellow MRA's. Protests are really only for networking with other MRA's.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 07:47 PM
1

You're an idiot you can't rely on women to save us. So women are going to realize being a man isn't all they thought and their going to roll the clock back to 1901. Men themselves have to challenge women's victimhood. 100 years ago while we protected women as they provided children we weren't subservient to women's victimhood as we are now. We have to form networks and work against the idiots. We must ensure good communication especially on this board starting with clearing crap like you off it.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 07:22 PM
0

We didn't have that obsessive drive to protect women 100 years ago they may have been treated better than men but not to the extent that they are now.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 07:14 PM
2

There are very specific complicated reasons why Polanski is getting away with it too complicated to get in to as I said brainless this is not a thread about Polanski. Do some research on him if you want. In 999 out of 1,000 cases the man would be charged if convicted he'd be treated as pariah for the rest of his life. Why bring up this 1 out of 1,000 cases as if its typical. Unless you're an anti, looking at your other comments you're trying to sow discontent.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 07:14 PM
1

It was nothing like this 100 years ago start reading will you.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 07:13 PM
4

He's in exile dozy. In case you didn't realize retard this thread isn't about Polanski. If you're anti men go some where else, if I wanted anti male comments I'd go to the Dailymail.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 06:53 PM
10

Stop being an idiot loyal supporters he's very well connected and extremely wealthy. Notice I said he had to avoid going to the US as he might be charged. There regularly are articles around the internet attacking him but people treat the reverse an attack on a boy as a joke even say he's lucky. Read what I wrote a few times I can't work your brain here.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 06:48 PM
20

Are you pro or anti men's rights? Why bring up Polansky he's not in the US and notice he had to avoid the US to avoid charges. And of course there was huge outcry against him. Sometimes I wonder what kind of people are on this board they always side against men.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 06:04 PM
2

So what if women express what they think, its good if women are honest about what they think of us. Its when they lie and manipulate men against each other we have to be concerned.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 05:36 PM
1

Done.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 05:34 PM
1

People have often requested anti's a crap posters to be deleted but always with the reply that mods don't delete posts. But of all the posts you delete you delete this.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 05:29 PM
1

What are you complaining for bitch? Sounds like someone's had a sheltered life. How about you complain about the fact that on every level a woman's welfare is treated as ten times more important than men.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 03:15 PM
3

The accuser in this case was 15 while it is wrong what about those cases where young boys are sexually groped by women or female baby sitters who claim to be just checking or just satisfying their sexual curiosity about penises. Why should we ignore these just because alcohol isn't involved or the woman doesn't end up in bed with the boy. Groping a 3 year olds penis is every bit as bad in fact far worse in fact given the 3 year old is defenseless.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 12:03 PM
7

This is in the so bad its good category. At least it'll wake a few more guys as to how anti men the legal system is.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 12:08 AM
3

Yes but men are the first to agree with this. They're angry at the guy accused. Men themselves are the problem until we see this we never get anywhere.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 12:21 AM
22

Horrible but maybe some guys need this to wake up as to how anti-men the system is.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 01:18 PM
2

Ok thank you I'd say its a child sex abuse.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:01 AM
2

Did you routinely check the vagina of small girls as well for any dangers? Its hardly necessary for this to be done at all such routine acts wouldn't be performed on girls.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 06:24 PM
1

Why would he cringe at one and not the other?
/r/MensRights16/02/18 06:22 PM
3

Definitely reporting a doctor for sexual assault of a minor which is what it is would make them think again.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 04:26 PM
2

Definitely routinely groping a boys genitals like this is wrong. While I'm impressed that this woman is as concerned about boys as she is about girls I wouldn't call these doctors well meaning. They should probably be charged or struck off as doctors.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 04:25 PM
2

I'm impressed that this woman is as concerned about boys as she is about girls. I wouldn't call them well meaning they should probably be charged or struck off as doctors.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 04:24 PM
2

The morality of it is working attitudes to circumcisions is changing greatly. Once people would laugh at it its far more common now to take it seriously.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 04:22 PM
1

What's your problem? You mean you didn't cringe at the common sexual assault of boys in hospital but on the imagined assault on girls.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 04:20 PM
7

I so much agree with you why do we have to base our arguments on whether it leads to less orgasms or even whether its good for women. Don't cut little boys genitals. We instinctively know its wrong to cut or even mess with baby girls genitals.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 04:12 PM
1

You need to go back and read my comment I'm against the idea that women are ten times more important than men. I want us to stop thinking a sexual assault is equivalent to torturing and burning someone alive. Or better yet go somewhere else.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:42 PM
1

Then share your knowledge genius why should crimes against women be ten times more important than crimes against men.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 09:14 PM
1

For an intimate exam don't you think men should have the possibility of requesting a male doctor just like women can request a female doctor?
/r/MensRights08/02/18 10:37 PM
1

Well men are belittled if they do ask for privacy/dignity so they're mostly afraid to ask for it. They're made to feel petty, unmanly or even misogynistic.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 10:33 PM
9

Or maybe we need to challenge our paradigm that crimes against women are 10 times more serious than crimes against men. And do we really want them to sweep this under the carpet. Open discussion on falsely accused men is generating discussion about the all powerful victim card.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 10:25 PM
1

Well said thanks!
/r/MGTOW08/02/18 10:22 PM
1

Sorry I was reading it completely differently. Thanks very much for that.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 09:55 PM
3

Why are you describing him as an MRA? Link please??
/r/MensRights05/02/18 07:29 PM
1

maybe they are brainless nothing to do with men's rights but biology.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 07:19 PM
6

If there's a double standard its that the female nether regions are sacred and it would be considered vicarious rape for his tongue to be in her vagina.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 07:18 PM
1

Brainless would you call groping a woman sexism. Sexism is saying sweetie.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 07:17 PM
1

What you've described just there isn't sexism, the word sexism trivialises it. Sexism might be opening doors for women.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 11:12 AM
2

Yea guys have to concentrate on bettering themselves and the women will follow.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 06:25 PM
3

Yea there's a major stigma about vagina we almost never hear discussions about the vagina in polite company. We pretend vaginas don't exist we even pretend breasts are the female equivalent to penises. These vagina monologue type efforts are to destigmatise vaginas and hence liberate women. While these women aren't as oppressed as they think they are I've no problem with them destigmatising a body part.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 02:55 PM
55

Yea but it isn't sexism its sexual assault.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 02:10 PM
5

I know plenty of these types of women they'd look at you confused if you called them a feminist. Can you get your shit together.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 02:08 PM
1

When did I say I was a tradcon. The current effort to sell men the traditional role, sell men on chivalry/white knightism is the biggest enemy we have.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 10:43 AM
2

Woman spreading refers to something else, google it if you dare.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 09:39 PM
21

Yea "The Good Men Project" is based on the philosophy that men are morally inferior and that we must strive to redeem ourself by self sacrificing ourselves for women. No mention that society condemns men and takes away their rights on the word of a woman.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 07:20 PM
-1

Which shows your whole ignorance and conditioning to think women are 100 more important than men. Being tortured for hours is like 5 minutes of rape for some people. What brought you here brainless, you need to get out of your conditioning what would cure you hours of torture??
/r/MensRights24/01/18 02:32 PM
1

Far worse than feminism or marxism is the traditional man attack which plays on men's insecurities and wanting to be strong and tells men to man up. Now that men are waking up to something is wrong they're being sold the traditional man route by slime like peterson. So women get to keep all their advantages but men get the obligations but none of the advantages. Surely you can see this. Brainless what brought you to a men's rights site?
/r/MensRights24/01/18 02:30 PM
1

Its not just our evolutionary past 150 years ago could a wife kick a father out of the house and not let him see their kids but still demand he pay her. If a wife hit and the husband hit her back he wouldn't be vilified by the whole community. Surely you realise somethings happened in the last 50 years we've been demonised and guilt tripped and turned on each other. In everything you say you seem content with these double standards or at least a certain amount of these double standards because t…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 12:50 PM
7

Thanks I'll look at those links later they look pretty good. I'm well aware that females are often sexual predators As a young child I was a victim of a female sexual predator.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 09:34 PM
1

I'm asking you to think a little bit harder. Forget about the feminists and the marxists. What is it about men that have made us unable to resist this anti male propaganda, why is it when a female plays her victim card men rush to avenge the evil man. Its a virulent form of traditional man is the real issue here and its that must be identified and destroyed. Slimey petersen doesn't address why are crimes against women 20 times more important than crimes against men. He's more interested in this …
/r/MensRights23/01/18 09:08 PM
2

Does forced envelopment mean rape by a woman? Your previous post was a bit ambigous that's all.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 08:59 PM
0

Brainless did you even read the opening post. Why is rape the one of the most heinnous things you can do to someone without killing them. How about torturing someone for hours surely that's worse than sticking your dick in a pussy for a minute or so. Do guys on this board ever think of what they write.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 07:46 PM
5

You missed the point of the opening post he's arguing that all rape shouldn't be considered as bad as it is when we consider violence against men as being of no importance.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 07:44 PM
2

I agree we're jsut obsessed with women's vicitmhood every womann gets a word in about her victimhood any chance she gets. The pendulum continually changes and I believe in decades the natural result of the over obsession with female victimhood is we'll dismiss it completely.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 07:42 PM
2

She dismisses the impact almost entirely. The impact on who men or women.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 07:38 PM
0

You missed his point brainless he's talking about all rape isn't as bad as we make it out to be. Its just because the vicitm is woman its considered worse. Forget the discussion for did she drink too much that's for the dailymail its about time we took away the female victim card completely.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 07:36 PM
-2

you went off topic idiot.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 07:33 PM
4

I agree good post we have to stop thinking female welfare is 20 times more important than mens. If a man was badly beaten no one would care but a woman who's sexually assaulted is considered the worst of all crimes. There's a slight bit of violence but our view of sex crimes or any crimes against women is totally out of proportion.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 07:30 PM
2

This is just spam again some clever anti just posting garbage again.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 07:22 PM
1

That's just the way it is. You can't go around pinching women's asses, because again, they are seen as the gender most important to procreation. That's why female sexuality is seen as more sacred than men's, and why you go to jail for doing it, but she wouldn't. It is a remnant of our evolutionary past that protects women above all else in a society. Surely on a men's rights board, we should be challenging these double standards against men if not why are you here. There was not this obsession w…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 07:09 PM
1

He's not on a roll he's selling out, he never talks about how men are maltreated by the system. He's just worried that so many men are dropping out of the system and he's helping society patch this up.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 06:58 PM
1

You can't go around pinching women's asses, because again, they are seen as the gender most important to procreation. Raping is done in nature all the time the Ram jumps on a female. When one country defeated another they usually raped the females, to the victors the spoils. I'm making it simple for you, you are arguing that women are more valuable and we must treat them better then you are eradicating these universalist principles which developed over the last few centuries in Europe. If we are…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 06:56 PM
2

Look guys like you bash men all the time, wax on about how sacred women's welfare is and then cry when things like this happen. Don't you think theirs a link between putting women on a pedestal and then getting screwed over by the system. If you give women this victim power they'll use it against you.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 06:07 PM
1

At the core of this anti male society are the white knights, they're the real enemy without them the system couldn't fit in place, whether they be police, judges or the guy who attacks you in a bar for offending the women folk. Until we recognise this we'll never get anywhere.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 05:38 PM
1

Its not women who bitch about men are the problem its women who pay me agaisnt each other. And of course the white knights who allow themselves to be manipulated by women and attack men.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 05:34 PM
1

Maybe we have to start seeing this colapse as a good thing. Women are so sly and tricky nothign but completely starting afresh will do. MRA's are a tiny number of people in society even on this subreddit real MRA's are probably a minority. MRA's have to start helping each other and forget about men who aren't MRA's and who hate MRA's.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 05:21 PM
1

So the equivalent would be for women to have their vagina flaps taped up.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 05:00 PM
1

I don't treat genitals with fear or distain. I love vagina. I just get very disappointed when we're maipulated by women tothink breasts are the equivalent so we won't make jokes about vagina. Its just another way we're manipulated by women. More to the point this is a nonsese thread its just made up to distract from real issues.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 04:53 PM
1

Are you for real?? Brainless you're on a men's rights website and you're saying women are more important as women are more important to procreation??? And you say Men cannot sexually assault women and your implication that its not a problem for women to sexually assault men. Again Brainless Monkeys work on the basis of hierarchy if the monkey is the head of the hierarchy he could rape all the females he wanted. If the monkey took all the food he'd be killed but not for raping a female. Down thou…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 04:44 PM
-4

Brainless its not a personal distinction. Breasts are not genitals. this isn't a real story anyway is it. why make up nonsense like this.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 04:23 PM
1

Its not an MRA issue its a bullshit issue the flight attendant would not say something as stupid as that. doubt she's even notice. We have enought of issues without distracting with retardness as this. I've never heard of a flight attendant saying something so stupid.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 04:22 PM
-5

Where did she she hoped they would never sexually assault someone.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 12:38 PM
0

This whole thread needs to be deleted this is spam just to waste everyone's time. Threads like this destroy the board when spam like this comes up just delete the thread and delete the userid.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 11:56 AM
2

Yes glad someone noticed this people are just posting nonsense articles just to make this sub reddit non workable.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 11:44 AM
-13

tits aren't genitals retard. And in case you haven't noticed idiot this is a spam nonsense article. No one got charged with rape for having an erection.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 11:43 AM
1

where's the origial article I can't see it there.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 11:41 AM
-1

We know that idiot no one's saying you have to eat a vegan diet.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 11:38 AM
1

This is a non story why fuck up this board with nonsense like this?
/r/MensRights23/01/18 11:38 AM
0

The thread starter should give the full story otherwise he should be banned.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 11:37 AM
1

Yea men are convinced they have to pretend they enjoy it.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 08:40 PM
1

I had the bouncers boot her, Hopefully litterally. Yes you were sexually assaulted problem is most guys feel they have to be happy about the double standard.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 08:22 PM
2

Exactly he was the first to bash men himself. We have to come to the conclusion MRA's are not fighting for all men but for those who'll support their fellow men. MRA Networking is key so we can help ourselves help each other.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 07:45 PM
1

One of the thinks he often talks about is the pay gap is largely due to women being more agreeable than men. Ie women are so nice they get paid less.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 08:48 PM
1

Your talking about natural laws??? If it we were dealing with natural laws guys could go out an rape women as they're stronger. But in actual fact we're obsessed with women's victimhood. Just pinch a womans fanny and you're in jail. See that's the problem the likes of you and jordan go for the natural law when it comes to men but are ever so sensitive when it comes to women's welfare. Thus men loose out in both ways.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 08:09 PM
1

Inciting men to act but first inciting men to think. What good is it for men to have the shackles of traditional man if women can have all the freedoms of modern woman. In this paradigm men still have to self sacrifice for women and must man up but women can pursue what ever paths they will with out the restrictions of the past. Don't you see how unbalanced this is??
/r/MensRights19/01/18 11:18 PM
1

Just when men are starting to wake up and starting to ask the question if we’re meant to be equal why is women’s victimhood ten times more important than men’s. Then along comes Jordan pretending to be a friend of men and completely confuses and distracts from this key issue. He makes the issue about men being noble and being able to accept everything thrown at them, must self sacrifice and be honourable like the men of old. This is all short hand for men need to man up. He takes a knee jerk rea…
/r/MensRights19/01/18 11:16 PM
1

Ok thanks for a quick reply. I would have thought otherwise there was a case against the company for compulory humilation of men. There would be a case if women had to pee in front of men.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 11:12 PM
1

Yes but the question I'm asking is the urinal just outside the door in which case the user of the urinal doesn't have privacy.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 10:51 PM
-51

Jordan Petersen is the most anti men there is. He wants men to man and return to the traditional model of working hard but keeping women first but no mention to giving men back privileges. He's great at complimenting men but he stops at saying any thing anti PC. He would never say something controversial like what are crimes against women ten times more important than crimes against me.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 10:29 PM
2

So does this mean that the men have to use the urinals in front of women who come in to use the stalls?? Surely that would be a breach of human rights.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 10:18 PM
1

In the shared bathroom is there urinals or just stalls??
/r/MensRights18/01/18 10:08 PM
1

Looks like you should just go ahead and use the women's shower cubicles and if someone makes an issue of it make an issue of the discrepancy of shower cubicles for men. I believe most here were as confused as I was as you posted pictures of what look like toilets and used the American term bathroom which refers to toilets. The title is also misleading as its not that only women get privacy its more an issue of the difference in the number of shower cubicles for men an women.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 06:06 PM
1

the women’s showers (as in private cubicles) are frequently empty. Look at what you wrote above it contradicts with what you just wrote here.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 01:17 PM
2

so do the women have private cubicles for their showers but not the men?
/r/MensRights13/01/18 12:52 PM
1

Of course the cubicles can be locked. Seriously what are you up to? can you stop messing people around. What exactly is your issue on privacy. Is it when you're showering? Is there a communal shower for men and women?
/r/MensRights13/01/18 12:40 PM
1

Not in the US. You mean people going to the cubicles can watch those showering. You picture is propbably redundant and misleading then. And if its a communal shower its theoretically the same for both sexes hence your title is misleading. Of course you shouldn't be apologetic about no wanting women watching you changing its natural its just some macho thing that's crept in to society in the last few decades that men are supposed to be happy about being sexually humiliated. You should be apologet…
/r/MensRights13/01/18 11:31 AM
1

Of course general health is important for everyone, getting sleep getting help for depression anxiety etc. Self improvement is good for everyone thats a topic for a different type of board, self improvement boards are all over the internet. You're not fighting other people to do this but you are fighting the state if a woman makes a false allegation against you. As MRA's we're concerned with
/r/MensRights12/01/18 09:45 PM
1

You should have said showering do people who enter the toilet-gym changing room see people changing? Bathroom in the US refers to WC.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 09:43 PM
1

Thats idiotic how would having better health stop the police attacking you.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 03:13 PM
1

Largely men are guilt tripped by the whole of society about any abuses of women. We focus on female suffering excessively. Thus men feel angry anytime they see a woman suffering and feel they have to attack some man either physically or indirectly via the legal system.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 03:10 PM
1

What does communal bathroom mean?????? I know in the US bathroom means what we in Europe would call a toilet. I don't think men and women shit in front of each other so what exactly do you mean by that?? presumable they shit in cubicles??? Can you stop messing around. If its showering you have an issue with say that. If you're starting a thread about a men's rights issue you owe it to others in Men's Rights to be clear on the issue you're describing.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 02:53 PM
5

I've read the whole thread and I'm as confused as ever as to what you're point is and I'm a sympathetic listener. Sounds like most of the other commentators are also confused. If you are going to make a thread you should at least make it clear. Please explain the lay out of the bathroom. Are you saying those toilets you showed are in the same room as the shower room so women can see guys showering?
/r/MensRights12/01/18 01:11 PM
1

Its the whole guilt dynamic that makes men feel they have to attack other men is the real driving force in this.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 11:26 AM
2

No its far more widespread than this. Any time a woman plays the victim card the state will attack the man in some way (or 98% of cases). People try to distract us from this in to health issue but attacks by the state are the biggest problem men face.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 11:18 AM
1

Wow someone agreed with men on reddit. I'm in shock.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 11:16 AM
1

Reason is what decides what's the best course for Men's rights. Feminists get peoples back up, SJW's are mostly a joke. Its this traditional man stance where they're angered to attack other men at the behest of women and women's victim power that underpinns everything.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 11:08 AM
2

Campaigns like this distract from the issue that the real problem men have is the state itself and its direct attacks on men at the behest of women. It would be more important for us to concentrate on these direct attacks rather than men's health generally.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 10:38 AM
2

Campaigns like this distract from the issue that the real problem men have is the state itself and its direct attacks on men at the behest of women. It would be more important for us to concentrate on these direct attacks rather than men's health generally.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 10:37 AM
2

Yes but we must learn the real dynamic here ultimately its the guilt tripping of men that's the issue. This guilt tripping of men makes men feel the need to attack other men either in the form of physically attacking or attacking in the form of the police.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 08:10 AM
0

Prior to the demonisation and guilt tripping of men which started 50/60 years ago men were able to stick up for themselves against women. They didn't have to fear attacks by the chivalry White Knight types. If you're interested in Men's Rights or Men's Advocacy you need to learn the real dynamic here that its the White Knights are the real enemy.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 08:08 AM
6

she's naieve if she thinks the demonisation of men is just a new thing. This has been on going for 50 years. We're guilty automatically by virtue of being men. And its a bit tragic that they're no high profile male actors comming out complaining about the demonisation of men. We can expect women to save us nothing's going to change till men wake up.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 07:14 PM
1

Thanks for saying this Catherine Deneuve, but she's naieve if she thinks the demonisation of men is just a new thing. This has been on going for 50 years. We're guilty automatically by virtue of being men. And its a bit tragic that they're no high profile male actors comming out complaining about the demonisation of men. We can expect women to save us nothing's going to change till men wake up.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 06:53 PM
1

Thanks for saying this Catherine Deneuve, but she's naieve if she thinks the demonisation of men is just a new thing. This has been on going for 50 years. We're guilty automatically by virtue of being men. And its a bit tragic that they're no high profile male actors comming out complaining about the demonisation of men. We can expect women to save us nothing's going to change till men wake up.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 06:53 PM
6

Like people thought that if you give women legal advantages over men that women wouldn't lie and manipulate these advantages. Our whole society assumes women are uniquely virtuous.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 05:29 PM
3

Good nothing like drops in salary to get guys worked up, literally nothing else gets them upset.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 09:52 PM
1

What does "pull your knock in mate" mean? Men's rights are about challenging the inbuilt assumptions on which our society is built. Assumptions about crimes against women being 10 times more significant than crimes against men. But you're accepting this as a premise. Don't know why you don't understand this. We should be using the controversy generated recently to initiate real reflection in society about women being far more important than men.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 04:57 PM
1

Why should crimes against women be ten times as important than crimes against men in the first place. If you told the police you were sexually assaulted by a woman they'd just laught at you. The idea that sex crimes against women are the worst crime imaginable has to be tempered with more rational thinking. It should still be a crime but not given 10 times the significance it should have.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 04:54 PM
1

Our response shouldn't be to accept it brainless!
/r/MensRights06/01/18 09:15 PM
1

Stop trying to promote acceptance of this then. Do you regard yourself as supporting men's rights.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 09:13 PM
1

"its not rape if he did not know or understand that she had nnot consented". Look furchfur, why do we have to reason within their parameters. Their parameters say crimes against women are ten times as important a crimes against men. We have to give up on the sanctity of crimes against women and give them the equality they've ask for.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 09:00 PM
1

What men should be thought from a young age to be accept being second class citizens. Why not charge her for rape given he was drunk??? we need to argue for equality not trying to encourage men to accept being second class citizens. That's what equality is about.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 08:46 PM
1

You're an idiot why does a woman have to privilege of making up false allegations in the first place? Why does she have the privilege of being able to destroy a man's life. Its disgusting that this retarts post comes up first someone needs to delete nonsense like this.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 08:12 PM
2

Its much more than feminism its female victimism.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 09:28 PM
1

Its similar to everywhere else why are crimes against women ten times more important than crimes against men?
/r/MensRights03/01/18 08:48 PM
2

Its similar to everywhere else why are crimes against women ten times more important than crimes against men?
/r/MensRights03/01/18 08:48 PM
9

But at least she comes with a warning sign attached to her. We should be applauding her honesty. Its the ones who're able to manipulate the system (not to mention friends annd brothers) against us that we should worry about.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 11:28 PM
0

She's partly right in what she says women give birth men don't. Not sure why any thinking man should be upset about this what we need to be worried about is women who play the victim.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 03:19 PM
1

Partly true but we need a realisation that this is a society wide problem. Most men see everything through the lenses of women's suffering is much more important than men. Nothing much will change until men change.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 06:22 PM
4

I believe they're trying to head off the growing discontentment amoung young men who're starting to realise that the whole system hates them. I'm more cynical of them actually doing anything when in the same article I read comments like this from the Met Police commissioner. Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Dick told the BBC that the use of evidence in other cases was being looked into to reassure the public. How can we be reassured if the police is institutionally anti-men? And its not…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 06:10 PM
17

They're desperate to down play this. They're trying to spin this in terms of police automatically believing the victim to make it gender neutral. This is about much more than the police automatically believing the victim or automatically believing rape accusers. The police are institutionally bigoted against men why? because our whole culture is bigoted against men. What needs to come out of this is a greater realisation that women's victimhood is seen as ten times as important as that of men, a…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 12:52 PM
1

Allowing the system to go in the damage limitation mode is not in our interest we should be making the most of this by ensuring a greater realisation that the whole system even our society is anti men. Its not in our interest to pretend its just about one man.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 11:17 AM
1

Yea but we should be leveraging the outrage about this mistreatment not arguing that they should tidy things up and sweep anything under the rug. We should be leveraging this case to prove there is institutional bias against men in the police and criminal justice system (and deeply ingrained in society too). We should be arguing we need the authorities to recognise that men are treated as second class citizens compared to how female victimhood is treated and a man's life can be destroyed when a …
/r/MensRights20/12/17 07:19 PM
1

I have read the article zombie but we should have good comments at the top of the thead, this tread is a waste of peoples time.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 10:08 AM
3

Its little do do with Mark Azariah we don't want fall guy or we don't want annonymity. We want the criminal justice to face to the face that they're two classes of people in society men and women and this is the biggest problem we face in society today.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 10:04 AM
19

exactly the met is making it about one man when the whole organisation hates men. It treats men like they have no rights when a woman plays her victim card.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 09:50 AM
1

How about institutional biggotry talking of sexism is making a joke of it. Anyway these examples are good for us in raising awareness. The last thing we want is annonymity.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 09:48 AM
0

Tragic that a dumb comment like this is first. How is the reader supposed to learn from a comment like this?
/r/MensRights19/12/17 11:04 PM
0

We can't treat everyone as equal then the few decent comments will sink under the weight of garbage.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 06:43 PM
1

What are you talking about if you're going to draft a reply at least use your braincell.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 06:42 PM
1

Brainless now that some momentum has built up how about using this productively to actually solve it now just placate the problems or deal with the symptoms. How about the heads of police who constantly pour resources in to attacking men. How about the women who constantly play the victim. How about not treating all crimes against women as ten times as important as crimes against men.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 06:41 PM
2

Common playing with words now. They don't think they're superior to men but they expect society to care much more about women's welfare than men's.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 07:14 PM
1

Ok when you come back from your job give it a quick reread. The only way we'll get anywhere is by real MRA's networking and coming to each others help when we challenge the system. We need to start by finding genuine MRA's with beliefs in line with our own help them as brothers and grow from there. All the best, bro.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 05:59 PM
2

The word feminism is never used by most women in society let alone as a description of themselves.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 05:54 PM
1

There are always going to be dishonest people in society we can never stop that. But society is meant to treat people equally and not treat one gender as ten times more important than the other. Why should a sex assault on men be treated as a joke and a sex assault on a women as a crime worth ten years in jail and complete ostracisation as the most vile criminal for the rest of your life.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 05:52 PM
3

Most women wouldn't even mention the word feminism but still slyly demand more concern for the welfare for women. Not sure why anyone would try to deny this.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 12:26 PM
1

Someone can take a case against the police and the legal system that they treat the sexes as two classes of people.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 12:25 PM
0

Not sure why we let garbage on the board like this.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 12:23 PM
1

Why are you here if you're so defeatest? Get lost if you don't mind.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 12:22 PM
1

Macheako, I said more than looking at people as their title. Can you go back and reread it there's valuable information there.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 12:20 PM
2

Its not just feminists most women that would profess to hate feminists believe women should be twenty times more important than men.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 10:26 PM
8

Hopefully not surprising everywhere you look a woman is ten times more important than a woman. The issue isn't about a false accuser, corrupt cops or an overzealous prosecutor its about the value system in England.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 10:19 PM
6

Its the system is wrong she's just some crazy bint. It if wasn't her it would a different crazy bint. We have to give up thinking a sex assault against women is so important as to destroy a man's life. No one cares a about a sex assault against a man.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 10:15 PM
5

Why should the system be obsessed with women's welfare? Why should the system treat women as ten times more important than men?
/r/MensRights17/12/17 10:08 PM
8

He's experienced more of the system than you have and he realises that as a man he's completely worthless compared to women in the eyes of the law. He realises there's a much bigger issue at stake than just one guy whether this guy is incompetent or malicious.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 10:06 PM
25

No you're missing my point. Everywhere we look the police and the legal system treat women as ten times more important than men. Yes they'll try and scape goat a guy as if they're doing something to solve it but its not the real issue.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 10:03 PM
435

I like this statement by the accused: The accused, Liam Allan, said magnanimously of the detective who might have cost him the best years of his life: ‘I would like to make it clear that this man is not solely responsible for the failures of the system. He should not be used as a scapegoat.’ One man shouldn't be made a scapegoat for the police. The whole police is anti-men. Someone needs to sue the police for its systematic bias against men. Although Scotland Yard and the CPS are looking into wh…
/r/MensRights17/12/17 05:10 PM
1

This is exactly why men or some men are the enemy. We need to give up the idea that we're fighting for all men, when most of them hate us. We need to network and start finding genuine MRA's in our area and start supporting each other in what ever way we can.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 03:12 PM
2

Why would you want to swop the genders.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 03:08 PM
1

Very sorry to hear your story, its horrific. I also experienced sexual abuse by a female babysitter along time ago when I was young. One of the hardest things for a boy sexually abused by a woman is no one will believe you or they'll be angry we’re so trained today to see any criticism of women as misogyny. Even if they believe you they don't see it as abuse you're male and she's female. People just don't get worked up by cases where a boy is sexually abused by a woman, society doesn't get worke…
/r/MensRights17/12/17 03:06 PM
2

I'm not guilty of this white knight stuff I've always seen through it. I've seen how women play us off against each other, don't know why others don't. Thus I agree in part with you that we have to treat each others like the brothers we're supposed to be but only those that treat us like brothers. We have to stop thinking we have to help all men, most are our enemies anyway they condemn us misogynists for sticking up for men. Forget relying on sisters to liberate us, men lead women follow and wh…
/r/MensRights17/12/17 09:54 AM
2

I agree with you this is more a problem with men than with women. I believe those white knights who want to protect a damsel when she plays the victim is the biggest problem of all. We have to realise these are our biggest enemy not crazy feminists. Only when we see the real enemy can we deal with it. The fact that you're post got down voted shows how short sighted MRAs are and how we need to think a little harder to understand the real dynamic at play.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 11:45 PM
1

I aggree with you it'll take another 30 years before we have anything approaching equality. While we will see improvement on certain areas society has a critical interest in like better teaching for boys or dealing with deliquency we won't have real equality for a long time. Most guys will attack us for being Men's rights if they need to get burnt to wake up and see reality then so be it, in the meantime we need to start networking and helping each other.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 11:34 PM
1

Maybe more men have to get burned before they wake up.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 05:01 PM
1

I remember when an object was inserted in a girl people all over the news talked about a heinous heinous crime but now it happened to many boys they're talking about forgivness. The hypocrisy of society is more maddening than the action of the accused. Response of the superintendent is to say how good the teams were doing. FFS. He wrote, “Let others know that we as a community will not be defined by the negative press outside of our community and various social media outlets. Be proud to let the…
/r/MensRights13/12/17 08:14 PM
1

Bozo well you should read it, it would save you making an ass of yourself. Its about underage boys being raped and the community dismissing it as nothing.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 05:03 PM
2

Exactly men are the powerless one's today we're so filled with self hatred.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 01:01 PM
2

Great point HeForeverBleeds our main enemy isn't women its white knights who feel they have to attack other men if they stick up for themselves. Until we realise this we'll never get anywhere.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 12:51 PM
0

Doubt this subreddit helps the few good points are drowned in the 95% of crap. I agree though there will be increasing awareness of the issues they'll probably try and placate men with some improvements but is 5% improvement in the issues sufficient to us? The'll probably address some problems with young men as it relates to helping the functioning of society generally. But what we really need is for a significant number of men to say these double standards are unacceptable any longer and do so …
/r/MensRights12/12/17 10:08 PM
0

Good explanation not that I care about this lawyer doubt he would care about guys falsely accused of sexual harrassement, guys like him are part of the problem. My opinion of him is confirmed by the fact that he apologised, he's probably of the opinion that men are always wrong even when he makes a compliment to a girl. Such a guy is seriously naieve about the danger of female victim power, pity he didn't get in to more trouble. Sorry to be ruthless about it but this lots more guys at the top ne…
/r/MensRights12/12/17 09:33 PM
0

No feminists don't care about men but they're partly right in blaming the patriarchy for men's problems, ie. the patriarchy in the form of traditionalism and the belief that men should man up and accept everything that society throws at them. Nothing will change until a signficant percent of men are angry about it, hence traditionalism and its belief that men shouldn't whine is a large part of making men feel they don't want to complain. You're writing is difficult to follow its hard to tell if …
/r/MensRights12/12/17 08:47 PM
1

She didn't objectify him, she sexually assaulted him.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 08:05 PM
-4

I did notice genius!!! Its pointless bringing it up just because a women sexually assaults someone she has to be a feminist?? What kind of logic is that?
/r/MensRights12/12/17 02:43 PM
1

When I see examples like this and then see white knight types attacking any man who speaks out about the double standards for men I despair I become cynical and start to loose interest helping my fellow men if they don't want to help themselves. As MRA's we should start networking and helping each other those we know deserve trust and forget the rest of men who find it easier to attack their fellow men than speak out. If it takes being bitten in the scrotum before these guys wake up then so be i…
/r/MensRights12/12/17 12:04 PM
1

Far worse is the fact that she put her hand in his groin. Imagine a man putting his hand on a female contestants groin.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 11:54 AM
4

Furchfur, Came here to post this but you beat me to it. I'm interested in these cases as the courts don't recognise sex assaults by women even on young boys. What does it take for a sexual assault by a woman to be recognised. It needs to be a prolonged ordeal. It seems there has to be severe physical violence involved. And of course it was difficult to avoid recognising this as a sexual assault given the child was made to parade through the street naked.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 11:42 AM
1

Care to elaborate.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 11:20 AM
-5

Retarded, so if a woman does anything wrong she has to be a feminist what kind of dosey thinking is this. Women commit sex crimes against children as well why is this so hard to understand? Just that we don't recognise it as such.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 11:20 AM
1

The think is we should be bringing attention to the things no one cares about like men attacked by police on the false accusation of the wife or guys in jail for being falsely accused, the unpopular causes. This kid will get plenty of attention because the word racist bully was used.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 10:56 PM
-1

Regardless of a kid being bullied this isn't a men's rights issue. There is plenty discussion on racism and bullying of kids in society but little on men's rights, men being jailed on the word of a woman or men being thrown out of their house by the police on a false accusation.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 06:01 PM
1

Exactly you're bring up pointless stuff go mess up another board.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 12:20 PM
2

White Knights are the real enemy not feminists. Feminists would have no power if it wasn't for White Knights.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/17 12:16 PM
1

Shut up you're destroying this board you don't even know what you're saying yourself your rambling is destroying this board.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 12:01 PM
1

The wheasley guy with the glasses is the real enemy there. He pretended to be brave and said he wanted women to sexually assault him. If he wanted to be controversial why not make fun of sexual assaults against women, but he's too much of a coward for that. We have to realise that these chivalry types/white knights who believe women are 10 times more important than men are the real enemy not the actual feminists. Take up his offer to sexually assault him with a pliers.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 11:59 AM
1

The guy was the worst of all pretending to be brave but taking the easy way out and bashing men saying women should grope him. If he wants to be brave why not belittle women being sexually assaulted.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 11:34 AM
1

You're getting a bit obtuse and even confusing yourself. Just make simple arguments. As it stands she could grope you and then have you arrested for groping her. In reality you probably have to comply with her as she can turn the whole power of the state against you. Obviously as MRA's this should not be the case, you should need to talk about two second windows. By making these convoluted arguments your messing up the board.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 11:24 AM
1

Yea we need to start challenging these double standards.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 11:03 AM
1

Exactly she could destroy you're life if you groped her.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 10:58 AM
1

He's a pathetic little shit he want's to appear as if he's being controversial but terrified to actually go against the women. I've watched that idiot a number of times you can see he always has a furtive look on his face he's terrified there terrified of saying anything controversial.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 10:53 AM
1

Exactly if a guy groped her she could destroy his life.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 10:47 AM
2

Yea she wanted to exercise her power which is massive. If you were to grope her by the crotch she could accuse you of sexual assault. Obviously many women are going to love exercising that kind of power.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 10:44 AM
1

No the power is she can grab you by balls if you were to grab her by the genitals she could destroy her life.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 10:34 AM
1

In talking about power dynamics she has all the power. She can grope you by the genitals but if the man was to grope her back she could easily destroy his life. He'd be jailed, have a criminal record as a sex offender and hence ostracised by the whole of society.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 10:33 AM
1

Interesting issue to raise.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 10:29 AM
1

I had similar experiences and yes its a life changing moment. The issue is that if you were to grope her she could destroy your life. You'd have a criminal record it would destroy your chances of having a decent job or any kind of life as a sex offender all your friends and family would turn against you.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 10:28 AM
4

Yea that guy is really a weak slimey guy pretending to be a rebel and give a contrary opinion but in reality giving the women the answer they want to hear. And the other male voice they put on just then chimed in “I agree with everything Emma said” course you do you’re a weasel. They shouldn’t put men on the show if they’re that weak.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 12:10 AM
13

Society doesn't recognise that women can sexually abuse small boys. Almost never is the women charged unless she videos herself sexually abusing him or gives a detailed account on line as here.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 11:04 PM
1

Thanks very much for that, but you see ads specifying women, eg midwifes or other occupations where a female needs an intimate carer.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 11:12 PM
2

Your question didn't state that we all need to improve our communication. They definitely have a case for sexual discrimination, nothing like a sex discrimination case to change things.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 11:05 PM
1

Are you sure about I assume you're talking about UK.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 10:41 PM
3

Do you have any understanding what exactly is going on here? I am curious. Its assumed in society that its a breach of a females privacy if a man sees her naked but a man's privacy can't be violated by a woman.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 10:39 PM
2

Sorry to hear this but this won't change until some man takes a discrimination case against them. What country are you in?
/r/MensRights04/12/17 10:37 PM
1

What type of job is being advertised in the ad. What does Chemical Depend Program Asst mean?
/r/MensRights04/12/17 10:36 PM
1

Yes the suited women with naked men ad is very bad no way would that be allowed if it was naked women with a mans hand on her rear. You have to report this to the ASA before they review it. We should both report it. https://www.asa.org.uk/make-a-complaint.html
/r/MensRights02/12/17 10:03 AM
1

What relevance has that to the story?
/r/MensRights30/11/17 11:05 PM
2

Sorry for not replying sooner to your excellent post. The Myth of Artemis is a very poignant tale thanks for sharing it, hit me like a ton brick it’s such a powerful story and more relevant than ever today almost like the Greeks are screaming to us from two and a half thousand years ago. I’ve had close friends even a brother turned against me by women, like Artemis turned the hunter in to a beast so they did to me. Thanks for this classical reference the Greeks had an archetypical way of putting…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 11:04 PM
3

Yes I agree with both of you if a man took pictures of a woman's v@g without her permission and passed them around they're be charges. The problem is the guy believes he has to man up and not make a fuss about it. This is something we're always going to come up against again and again guys believe they have to man up. There was other factors in it, there was the embarrassment factor. Contrary to popular believe this is a far greater concern to a guy than a girl given men's genitals are far more …
/r/MensRights30/11/17 09:59 PM
1

Fantastic Graphic thanks!
/r/MensRights19/11/17 10:51 PM
1

Thanks I will.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 03:40 PM
2

Yet the system is anti you you're the bad one you're the sex offender by virtue of being male. Men are always the bad ones, women always the good. I had similar experiences but I'm automatically the bad one by society.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 10:44 AM
2

fantastic point very well put. We need to cultivate the art of putting our arguments in a succinct way.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 11:08 PM
5

Well done for getting annoyed when she tried to unbutton you're pants as lots of guys would have felt they had to man up and pretend they didn't object.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 11:04 PM
-1

Just what I wrote. The title is "What about Black Men?" If not that what is your question?
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:57 PM
1

Common think a bit further about what you say. Of course idiot men here don't like that women have such vicitm power to make false allegations. Whats key however is that more men wake up to this. But if we have a high profile case where people see that a woman has massive power over men to make such allegations then that's a good thing. More fabulous is that this has happened to a man hating white knight. How any one calling themselves an MRA can't see this as a win win is beyond me. You really …
/r/MensRights20/10/17 12:48 PM
1

If they don't know they're raped. What about the rape of a dead woman's body? Is that ok? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4998042/Husband-finds-male-nurse-having-sex-wife-s-corpse.html?mrn_rm=als1 and nothing wrong with replying to an old comment if people learn from it.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 12:34 PM
-1

toseawaybinghamton Look idiot are you asking what this feminist thinks of blackmen??? You don't seem very sure of you're question. Do you realise you're on a men's rights board wouldn't you be better of asking a feminist??
/r/MensRights20/10/17 12:19 PM
1

I agree we want a revolution in how our society views the sexes and we're going to have some casualities along the way. Its a win win if these casualities are men hating white knights. Bring on more of these cases.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 12:13 PM
1

But are you happy women have the option of destroying a man's life where groping a man is laughed off by the system. The only way we'll start seeing more awareness is if more of these men hating white knights are falsely accused. So we should see this as a positive.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 12:11 PM
1

We're not talking about equality of outcomes everyone will have different talents and motivations. But we do want equality under the law. We don't want women's welfare to be 10 times more important than a man's that way women can destroy a man's life just by making a false accusation.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 12:05 PM
0

Drezzire, why don't you read it first idiot when people don't read they create lots of disinformation on the thread.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 12:04 PM
1

We have to accept our biggest enemy isn't feminists but chivalry psychos. If this what it takes to wake them up this is what it takes.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 12:00 PM
1

On that basis date rape is ok, the woman doesn't feel anything does she. Would you agree with that.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:48 PM
1

We need to start banning these antis. if these people don't think this is a big deal so what but they shouldn't mess up this discussion. They need to keep out of the discussion.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:42 PM
1

What you open up a bag and admire a womans vagina.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:40 PM
1

Idiot, Stop trying to make light of it and pretend your pro men. The cadaver should be treated with respect if a pervert man abused a female corpse he's be in jail for a long time.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:36 PM
1

Thats what's so sly about it the same people would say it was so evil if it was done to women.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:31 PM
0

Again reverse the genders and its not just a body.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:50 PM
1

Don't be rediculous its far worse, makes the old haggs far more perverted.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:49 PM
1

Yes but HeroWords we never make those arguments when a female cadaver is violated so don't bother making it here.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:48 PM
2

Good point, Yea good point, men's/boy's rights in such intimate matters are seen as laughable. To many men its of paramount importants to have privacy in intimacy. I've known female nurses and they swopped stories of male patients genitalia and do unnecessary violations of men to inspect their genitals esp if the guys are hot. They're just as interested in men's genitals and as men might be in women, a huge number of women today are addicted to porn which would belie any notion that they don't h…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:46 PM
0

His argument is that it is immoral, if a guy opened a body bag to admire a woman vulva then surely this would be seen as sick and a crime. It would be the sickest crime of all. And the law is an on going work in progress, this maybe added as a new crime or the existing crime abuse of a cadaver should be used.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:36 PM
1

obara, not sure you should even try to reason with this slime. Some men will make every excuse for the excesses of women. Who needs feminists when you have scum like zurrain. At best this idiot is a troll. How can someone defend something like this I guess some guys see everything a women does as moral no matter what it is even abusing a cadaver.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:35 PM
0

Sop being a idiot its nothing like the story these women uncovering his genitals and admiring him. Not sure what you're doing on here.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:28 PM
0

Opening up a body bag and looking at her vagina?? Are you for real he'd be in jail for gods sake. It would be as serious as if the cadaver was alive. Don't know how idiots like this are left on the Men's Righs board.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:27 PM
1

Yea good point, men's/boy's rights in such intimate matters are seen as laughable. To many men its of paramount importants to have privacy in intimacy. I've known female nurses and they swopped stories of male patients genitalia and do unnecessary violations of men to inspect their genitals esp if the guys are hot. They're just as interested in men's genitals and as men might be in women, a huge number of women today are addicted to porn which would belie any notion that they don't have an inter…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:08 PM
1

No just conservative and I see men sexually humiliating themselves today as symbolic of our general downfall. Sure men have free choice but its after being heavily conditioned to accept certain values.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:46 PM
1

Their being conditioned to accept it, it like most aspects of society is a choice but a heavily conditioned choice.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 06:24 PM
1

Ok we've just begun. But the biggest problem of all we face is educating men. Once we change attitudes of a certain percent of men societies attitudes will change. What I've found most significant is teaming up with another MRA and discussing these topics for the benefit of an uninitiated man listening. Its amazing when the majority is in our favour that the listener will suddenly feel that they'res possibly something in Men's rights and will at least listen to the issues with out dismissing it …
/r/MensRights09/10/17 09:59 PM
1

We'll it wasn't strictly penetration so I'm not using the term rape. And I've witnessed women saying that groping of the genitals by female babysitter saying that it wasn't sexual assault. They don't feel uncomfortable about it cost the perpetrator was a female thus its not sexual assault. Also I know of women who are far worse than feminists. A large percent of women are intrinsically sly (we have to face this) at least feminists are able to say what they believe openly.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 09:50 PM
1

I'm a conservative man who doesn't like being sexually humiliated or seeing other men sexually humiliated. Do you think men would have gone to the toilet in front of women 80 years ago. There's something about this public humiliation which is symbolic of the humiliation of men today. As we know or should know at least most of the gender humiliation is encourged from birth so men don't see it. Most guys see any insults towards men from men being idiots to men being paedophiles isn't seen as wrong…
/r/MensRights02/10/17 01:59 PM
1

Men are ahead on public restrooms ie public humiliation. Calling this feminist logic is a bit low from you. I'm a conservative man who doesn't like being sexually humiliated or seeing other men sexually humiliated. Do you think men would have gone to the toilet in front of women 80 years ago. There's something about this public humiliation which is symbolic of the humiliation of men today. As we know or should know at least most of the gender humiliation is encourged from birth so men don't see …
/r/MensRights02/10/17 01:54 PM
1

Sorry Rethgil but it isn't just feminist trolls who defend female paedophiles women viciously defend female paedophiles when the sex assault against baby boys. Its as if they can't see a baby boy as having rights to bodily privacy.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 01:36 PM
1

Just so everyone knows what happned. She performed oral sex on her baby boy and recorded it for another fellow paedophile. If this was what she recorded how much more of this was she doing that wasn't recorded. This is just the tip of the iceberg women regularly sexually abuse small boys its just society won't recognise it as abuse they'll explain it away as just a bit of fun or just cleaning his penis by performing oral sex on it. Sorry to be graphic but you need to be repulsed by this creature…
/r/MensRights02/10/17 12:03 PM
2

Not sure but the "mother's" sentence was increased. http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/80177588/Woman-who-sexually-abused-son-and-sold-footage-has-sentence-increased?cid=app-android As we know a man could get this just for possession.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 12:02 PM
1

Just so everyone knows what happned. She performed oral sex on her baby boy and recorded it for another fellow paedophile. If this was what she recorded how much more of this was she doing that wasn't recorded. This is just the tip of the iceberg women regularly sexually abuse small boys its just society won't recognise it as abuse they'll explain it away as just a bit of fun or just cleaning his penis by performing oral sex on it. Sorry to be graphic but you need to be repulsed by this creature…
/r/MensRights02/10/17 11:58 AM
1

Yea Magic Tampon, But I think the real issue is the strength of victim power. If she tells the police her partner is an abuser they'll feel the need to come down on him hard.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 03:17 PM
1

Brainless this is the men's rights subreddit in case you can't read. Stick to the pokemon group will you at least untill you learn to read.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 12:32 PM
1

A couple of external urinals which pop out of the ground. They aren't very common however.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 12:30 PM
1

What's wrong with being androcentric its a men's rights board? Are you anti men's rights? I don't have a victim mentality I'm conservative and see it as demeaning for men to have to pee in front of women, the opposite would be seen as demeaning to women.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 12:15 PM
1

Did you think of this all by yourself genius. If this is a now a main stream opinion its an indication that MRA's need to be pushing for greater equality.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 12:19 PM
2

What is feminist thinking, if you're going to reply you should be clear on what you say.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 10:11 AM
-8

We don't want that. Common smarten up.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 11:44 PM
0

Common bozo you come up with that all by yourself how original. Would you honestly prefer they bully this guy in private. Far better the world knows how women have massive victim power.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 11:43 PM
1

Its rare in London a few of them. And few are dumb enough to use them. Guys will use a side street before peeing in front of a huge crowd of women.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 10:48 PM
1

There wasn't a ladies room available duh. That's why she went for a pee down a street.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 10:11 PM
2

Just googled urinals in Amsterdam. Its disgusting that men's urinals are open air like that as if they're designed to get men used to public sexual humiliation.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 09:30 PM
1

Just googled urinals in Amsterdam. Its disgusting that men's urinals are open air like that as if they're designed to get men used to public sexual humiliation.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 09:29 PM
1

the story doesn't make much sense. Is the judge saying that the women should have used an open air urinal which pops out of the ground or those toilets which are indoors.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 09:20 PM
1

Thanks for your vote of confidence, great to receive a thanks from someone who’s posts I’ve admired. However this idea has probably been elsewhere expressed on here but in roundabout rambling ways. My post resonated with you because its directness and clarity, it had an impact because I’ve managed to express it in clear succinct way. We won’t get anywhere unless we can communicate properly, clarity is our greatest weapon. We’ve got to start expressing the core ideas of MRA on here. This subreddi…
/r/MensRights20/09/17 05:42 PM
1

Don't we hear enough about female victimhood now we have to read it on a men's rights board. There are plenty of women to stick up for women's welfare no need for us to do it. Men have to start sticking together and stop putting women first.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 11:21 AM
0

He can't hear you he's got his head stuck up Hillary's vagina.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 11:18 AM
1

Of course police are far more prejudiced against you if you're a man. Everywhere the system is prejudiced against you by virtue of being a man. Women are treated as 10 times more important than men in all areas. Even some mainstream people are starting to notice this Mike Huckabee mentioned this recently. http://www.salon.com/2016/07/11/mike_huckabee_the_real_movement_in_america_should_be_male_lives_matter/
/r/MensRights20/09/17 11:11 AM
4

http://fightthenewdrug.org/this-years-most-popular-genre-of-porn-is-pretty-messed-up/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=ftnd_general&utm_term=blog&utm_content=blog_popular_genre "Ever thought about how this means that there are dads out there who are probably watching porn of girls that are the same age as their daughters? Or mothers watching porn performers the same age as their sons?" At least it recognises women watch porn as well.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 12:53 PM
1

Not sure why we should support some guy who wants to sexually humiliate himself. If he's no respect for himself why should we have support for him.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 08:28 AM
7

We need to stop teaching boys that women are ten times more important than them. We need to stop teaching boys that women are morally superior to them.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 07:55 PM
1

Not Charlie. Who's he?
/r/MensRights04/09/17 08:07 PM
1

I'm very much against telling men to man up. Whether this person was male or female we shouldn't be arguing what happened there was stalking or abuse. We should be getting away from the victim mentality.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 08:06 PM
4

No don't let it go when she plays her victim card. The best time to challenge the victim card is when its a small issue. When its a much more serious allegation its a bad time to challege it.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 08:18 PM
0

My apologies clarity is important: Don't you fools see what's going on? The police like to pretend they're fair in how they treat the sexes. Ie. they'll say see this stalker got a good sentence, so a guy can be jailed for hitting his girlfriend back. Hence my point that this can be used againsnt men. Its not in our interest to play the victim. We have to stop the victim card mentality.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 06:33 PM
-3

Just because women play victims there's no need for us to be victims. We have to stop the victim game.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 06:29 PM
0

yea that's part of it but she sent an idiotic email which isn't impersonating an officer, ie. not there in person. She certainly didn't destroy his life. He's either very stupid or very smart if you get my drift.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 06:28 PM
-21

He's retarded. If anyone here would beleive the police would send out emails to threaten someone rather than call in person please resign from the men's rights community. You're a liability. This should not be a crime. She's just a cutie with a wicked sense of humour. Don't you fools see what's going on here to pretend to men that they're taking crimes by women seriously so they can continue attacking men at the behest of women. What chance have we if we can think things through.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 08:16 AM
-1

No just a wicked sense of humour.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 08:10 AM
-7

Yea she's a cutie, good sense of humour too. Not sure what she wants with a special needs guy.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 08:09 AM
-17

You're an idiot. Its such a rediculous story. He'd have to be special needs for this to count as abuse. Don't you fools see what's going the police are using this to pretend that they're balanced they'll use this to justify attacks on men when women play their victim card.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 08:08 AM
-13

Its such a rediculous story. He'd have to be special needs for this to count as abuse. Don't you fools see what's going the police are using this to pretend that they're balanced they'll use this to justify attacks on men when women play their victim card.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 08:07 AM
-94

She didn't destroy his life. A man wouldn't have gotten any time. Its such a rediculous story. He'd have to be special needs for this to count as abuse. Don't you fools see what's going the police are using this to pretend that they're balanced they'll use this to justify attacks on men when women play their victim card.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 08:06 AM
2

Pity we didn't have the resources to take some sort of legal action. This is so ignorant and offensive on so many levels. We must totally destroy the notion that women's victimhood is ten times more important than men's. Otherwise they'll always beat us over the head with men are evil for that they did to women.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 10:52 AM
0

Is this your first post on Men's rights. Of all the things that might annoy you in the subject of men's rights you get upset about jokes about vagina. Not men being falsely accused men not seeing their kids no your upset about a joke about women. Women make jokes about dicks all the time so its refreshing if we're capable of making jokes about pussy. You need to get rid of this chivalry streak if your to be on a men’s rights board chivalry is the enemy of men’s rights and the main though if you …
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:40 AM
2

A scent of humour geddddit. And if the barbers are gay they won't like the scent of most succulent juicy tasty vagina, which doesn't sound a million miles away. Does it.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 10:14 PM
-4

Ok a good point I apologise for being rude. And thank you for putting a little bit more thought in to this comment than your last one. But if we want fairness for men we have to understand the power of women's victimhood and how omnipresent it is. Its everwhere and everyone accepts it without noticing it. Your father your brother your best friend and it appears you yourself. Harm done to a man is trivial but to a woman its 20 times worse as this article bears out.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 10:07 PM
1

Thats because women tell us we're not meant to make jokes about their vag's. Funny MRA's fall for this.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 10:04 PM
1

Don't be stupid no one would bat an eyelid. Why make up such victim nonsense? Its only when people make jokes about the holy of holies that people get upset cos women tell us we can't make jokes about it. Ironically even MRA's get upset about it.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 09:59 PM
-3

Did you get a phd in being a naive retard? This is about their victimhood which is cultivated everywhere in society. Even among many self proclaimed MRA's who want to harken back to traditional times they want to be protective of women. We have to understand their immense victimpower if we're ever to do anything about it.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 09:55 PM
2

He's arguing against feminism is the problem thus he's arguing against the issue being a recent political issue. I believe he's saying its a problem with women in general and how they manipulate men and how men allow themselves to be manipulated.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 07:46 PM
1

I would agree with you the feminists I know are far better humans than the women I know. Most women will pretend to be pro men but will manipulate the double standards. At least feminists have the courage to say what they believe but other women are extremely sly, nasty and snarly.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 07:44 PM
-2

Think they're just saying that as they believe the barbers are allergic to the scent of vaginas. Its a better scent of humour than most of the guys on here.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 07:33 PM
-8

No need to make things up retard. If you haven't realised the controversy is only if some reference is made to the female genitalia.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 07:32 PM
2

Not just feminists idiot. The police would be called and they'd get time in jail.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 07:30 PM
1

I was hoping you'd reply to my post we have a good discussion going. Clearly the real issue is the power of women's victimhood and they get this power from the enforcers of female victimhood, Chivalry traditional men. Guys who go off blaming feminism are so far off the mark.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 05:49 PM
0

Asshole you're destroying thisi board with this nonsense. Feminists love this crap.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 02:29 PM
2

Today most people profess to hate feminists this is a giant clue that they’re not the real cause. We’re part of a system which does a very good job of selling this chivalry to traditional man and they lap it up. They want to feel strong or good so they must stick up for women or maybe they just have aggression to offload and use chivalry to do this. You and me didn’t take the chivalry bait why did they? They’ve betrayed their fellow man they’re just too intoxicated with the idea of getting a pat…
/r/MensRights27/07/17 01:23 PM
2

Yea most guys here are concentrating on the left and feminism we almost always forget about our biggest enemy those on the conservative side which always demanded sacrifices from men whether we call them traditional man or chivalry men they are real enemy. They've been indoctrinated all their lives to see any challenging of women as a guy who's abusive towards women. Its difficult to break them out of this mindset as they feel in some way this makes them stronger and puts them above women. The b…
/r/MensRights27/07/17 09:53 AM
2

You've concentrated on the SJW's on the left they are a joke our real opposition is the chivalry type men who feel they have to get really worked up about what they see as the slighest trangressions against women. See my more detailed comments on this point under this thread.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 09:43 AM
2

You've concentrated on the SJW's on the left, you've completely forgotten the chivalry type men who are trained to be far more anti men and are vicious about what they see as any transgressions against women having been indoctrinated all their lives that anything vaguely anti women is abuse of women. We're squeezed between the SJW's and the more conservative chivalry types. chivalry men are far more vicious and are the real enemy. The West has always been protective of women, very against men wh…
/r/MensRights27/07/17 09:40 AM
2

Ok a good question. Men today are way behind the civil rights was in the 60's we haven't even begun to stick up for ourselves. Western society has uniquely encouraged men to protect women. It has always been very against men who're seen as abusers of women but in the last 40 years this has evolved in to an idea that any man who even sticks up for himself is seen as an abuser. There has been such one sided reinforcing of the model that women are victims and men are evil perpetrators. Women realis…
/r/MensRights27/07/17 09:28 AM
7

Thanks for this video, chivalry is hate. The real enemy of Men's rights isn't women or feminists but its men who feel they have attack other men who stick up for themselves against women. Some men are raised to be enraged if any man is slightly negative against women or who retaliates against women. Only when we systematically start gorrilla tactics against men who are chivalrous/anti men will we get anywhere. If some of these men had their testicles removed for being so anti men it would send a…
/r/MensRights26/07/17 11:15 PM
2

There are many videos like this around I've seen some on facebook and their are litteraly over 5,000 comments by women all saying how great this is. Its time men stop caring about women's victimhood they don't care about us. Now most of these men may have agreed to take part in the video but there's also the issue of it wouldn't be acceptable to do a video of men grabbing women by the vagina. This guys channel has another video where he grabs women by the tit obviously this isn't the same thing …
/r/MensRights26/07/17 11:06 PM
1

Yes genius but the issue is if they grabbed her vagina then police would be called and he'd likely get jail time.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 10:55 PM
2

We'll have to start taking these risks to get anywhere.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 10:54 PM
9

even for laughs it would be seen as outrageous if a guy made a video of grabbing women's vaginas.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 10:38 PM
1

Ok thanks at least for articulating your point there isn't as much of a double standard here. Most men in society could point out this double standard its not a controversial point anyway so women allow some communication on this point. It doesn't threaten the real issues women's victim power. The differential interms of a woman hits a man and not one cares versus the man hitting her back and it being the worst crime imaginable.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 10:15 PM
1

They'd probably say he was being rude, anyway she was overheard saying it its not like she said it in pubic we have to start concentrating on real issues these kinds of idiot topics shoud be banned. Men criticise women's appearance more than women criticise women.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 09:54 PM
1

Because as we know women never get criticised for their appearance.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 02:25 AM
2

Because as we know women never get criticised for their appearance.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 02:25 AM
3

Surely we've better issues to talk about than this, she's every right to say she doesn't like someone's appearance. Just like he's every right to knock her appearance. If he hasn't insulted her back it just means his a chivalry shit so he deserves ever insult he gets. Don't know how this post got 34 uparrows.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 11:57 PM
2

if women want to use the men's room they should have to use female urinals where they hover that way we can watch them going to the toilet as well.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 11:48 PM
1

are you retarded? this would surely diminish men's rights.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 11:42 PM
-2

Are you retarded or something did you even understand the whole question. Men already have a bathroom. do you think men should be sexually humiliated like this.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 11:41 PM
-2

Women will allow men to use the washroom when they are?? Are you saying this is a good thing. You're on a men's rights board.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 11:38 PM
3

Don't see why men should suffer because women hang around the toilet. Its sexual humiliation having to take your penis out in front of women.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:01 PM
2

Do you think its fair to men to have to take out their penis in front of women, isn't this sexual humiliation.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 05:58 PM
2

Hope you gave the hag shit back, we need to stop being gentlemen.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 05:53 PM
2

I would think keeping urinals was hardly fair to men. It means men have to take out their penis in front of women which is extreme sexual humiliation to many if not most men.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 05:52 PM
1

the LoL at the end. But maybe we should start seeing doctors who stick their fingers in vaginas unnecessarily as sexy after all most women make a joke of sexually assaulting male patients.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 08:21 PM
1

Do you find it funny a nurse violating patient privacy for lurid curiosity/gratification? What would you think of a male doctor having a bogus check of a woman's genitals for curiosity/fascination?
/r/MensRights23/07/17 07:10 PM
3

Joel Sherman writes some excellent articles on this subject: http://patientprivacyreview.blogspot.ie/2010/08/male-modesty.html http://allnurses.com/general-nursing-discussion/male-patient-modesty-1101618.html http://archive.is/sS83t This subject enrages me like no other, no other subject demonstrates the uneven concern in the welfare of society towards the sexes. The same people who would protest about how important women’s welfare is in this subject would belittle any concerns men would have on…
/r/MensRights18/07/17 08:23 PM
2

That's a great saying it's important in every area of life.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 08:22 PM
8

Yea good point, men's/boy's rights in such intimate matters are seen as laughable. To many men its of paramount importants to have privacy in intimacy. I've known female nurses and they swopped stories of male patients genitalia and do unnecessary violations of men to inspect their genitals esp if the guys are hot. They're just as interested in men's genitals and as men might be in women, a huge number of women today are addicted to porn which would belie any notion that they don't have an inter…
/r/MensRights18/07/17 07:12 PM
2

Yea I agree with You Macheako. we don't want the authorities censoring anyone pretty soon they'll be censoring/arresting us for saying feminists are evil. Is this what the idiots on this subreddit want? the authorities just using this to crack down on free speech. Most on this reddit don't think anything through.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 06:35 PM
1

100% agree. The authorities is just using complaints like this to ban free speech and then using this to pretend they are listening to men. Thus they'll use such rules to control what MRA's say claiming its hate speech against women. This is really bad news. Any MRA who thinks this is a victory has not thought this through.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 06:10 PM
1

Thank but the real kicker here is such a film making fun of burning a woman alive would cause great controversy and would be banned in many movie theatres.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 10:32 PM
1

Why is she a witch.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 04:00 PM
1

Yea but that's the point I'm making. Yes people are more against her than other female paedophiles but that's because her victim was female.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 03:52 PM
1

Really why don't you think before you make these idiotic posts. Are you an MRA or not? There are enough of people in the mainstream to make these idiotic assumptions about MRA's anytime they point out the double standards.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 01:51 PM
-1

Actually this story cheered me up. If this guy was allowing his wife to treat him like dirt then he deserved this. We have to start making a distinction between who accept this anti men treatment like lap dogs or those who want to completely change things and only support the latter. Hardworking guys who allow women to kick them out of the bed deserve no sympathy.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 01:38 PM
1

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4688426/Vigilantes-Pembrokeshire-attack-female-sex-offender.html As if on cue here maybe the first lynch mob ever gathers outside the house of a woman accused of paedophilia. Some here will think at least their treating her as a man. But here the key issue here is that her victim was a girl. And that's my point women's victimhood seems to trump everything.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 12:39 PM
1

Groping a boys genitals or inspecting them is far more invasive of a boys body.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 04:13 PM
63

The real issue that society can't face up to is that women sexually assault young boys. Female babysitters regularly grope or inspect boys genitals for sexual gratification/curiosity, however society can't face that this goes on we'd so indoctrinated with the idea that women can't perpetrate sexual assaults on young boys.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 04:12 PM
2

Female baby sitters regularly grope or inspect the genitals of boys and we don't even see this as sex abuse. This example here is so trivial by comparison with the extreme humiliation of small boys by female babysitters.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 11:52 AM
1

Think this example completely misses the point this video is wrong. But women baby sitters regularly grope or looking at boys genitals and we see it as ok. We dismiss it as we believe women couldn't sexually interfere with a small boy. This example in the vido is trivial by comparison.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 11:50 AM
1

This poster misses the whole point about the nature of the double standard. He foolishly believe becauses she was charged this means there isn't a double standard. The key issue is women's victim power thus its treated seriously as the victim is a woman unlikely there would have been charges if the victim was a man.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 11:26 AM
1

If you believe its a good point surely you should up arrow it. As per usual the anti-men points are at the top.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 11:34 AM
3

Yes but my point is if a baby girl was sexually assaulted by a woman then the babysitter would be charged but not if it was a boy. We're supposed to treat it as a joke.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 11:25 AM
7

The real issue with regard to women and paedophilia is that we can't recognise that women can sexually grope babies or todler boys under their control. If it happens to girls the authorities can recognise it. If a female babysitter was to remove a small boys trousers and underware people will put it down to her checking if he wet himself. If the sexes were reversed and a male babysitter removed a girls undergarments then people would be screaming about hanging him.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 10:27 AM
1

Chivalry is hate.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 08:02 PM
1

No we all know men look for sex more than women. The evolutionary arguments are so obvious so they don't require restatement. The only reason for stating such a blindingly obvious comment then is to affirm its validity and affirm that its correct. You need to think through what you're saying on a men's rights board. You think this allows us to discuss better with the opposition??? It's very simple, we just have to keep demand our right to equality in a strong assertive way. Once we start being t…
/r/MensRights06/06/17 12:10 PM
0

We all know men look for sex more than women. The evolutionary arguments are so obvious so they don't require restatement. The only reason for stating such a blindingly obvious comment then is to affirm its validity and affirm that its correct.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 11:57 AM
1

We all know men look for sex more than women. The evolutionary arguments are so obvious so they don't require restatement. The only reason for stating such a blindingly obvious comment then is to affirm its validity and affirm that its correct.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 11:57 AM
0

We are all aware of the origin of this double standard its so obvious as to not require restatement by someone playing the evolutionary psychologist. The only reason for stating it then would to reaffirm its a valid cause and this is how it should be.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 11:40 AM
0

I'm aggressive as this is the one place an MRA board where you would expect men to be supportive of men being sexually assaulted. We are all aware of the origin of this double standard its so obvious as to not require restatement by someone playing the evolutionary psychologist. The only reason for stating it then would to reaffirm its a valid cause and this is how it should be. Its important if we're on the same side that we think and review a few times what we right or we'll spend all our time…
/r/MensRights06/06/17 11:40 AM
1

I'm aggressive as this is the one place an MRA board where you would expect men to be supportive of men being sexually assaulted. We are all aware of the origin of this double standard its so obvious as to not require restatement by someone playing the evolutionary psychologist. The only reason for stating it then would to reaffirm it's correct and this is how it should be.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 11:27 AM
3

Exactly there's mostly pressure on guys not to make a fuss about something like this as it will appear unmanly. If men started sticking up for themselves the anti-male treatment by society would change quickly.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 11:00 AM
1

First of all: "i concluded with that because i wanted to differentiate myself from all the misogynist cunts on this subreddit." And I notice you've changed the conclusion of the original post which helps a little. But surely you are aware that these evolutionary arguments are used to justify all the double standards against men and such ideas that women are more valuable than men. You should have made it clear "some idiots think because in the past....." but even then your point wouldn't have be…
/r/MensRights06/06/17 10:39 AM
1

When we act all defensive about be called misogynist. We're reinforcing the taboo of criticising women. Yea sometimes on TV for eg we should defend ourselves but mostly we should just shrug it off.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 10:01 AM
0

I'll take it slowly. First he says: IT MAKES SENSE if you realise men are considered customers.......... .... ... Then says: "You can't rob a customer by giving him your product" So you can't sexually assault a man you're giving him your product. This board is full of retards.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 10:11 AM
1

Are you the writer of this document?
/r/MensRights05/06/17 10:01 AM
-2

I'll take it slowly with your if you're that dim. First he says: IT MAKES SENSE if you realise men are considered customers.......... .... ... Then says: "You can't rob a customer by giving him your product" So you can't sexually assault a man. Why is this mens righs board full of retards???
/r/MensRights05/06/17 09:59 AM
0

You're retarded if you think you're clarifying anything. He's endorsing a double standard against men. A man would have a criminal record if he sexually assaulted women he would always be labled a sex offender for the rest of his life yet its treated as a joke if a woman does it. A man couldn't go around sexually assaulting women on TV.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 09:32 AM
2

Yes you did call MRA's misogynist cunts. I'm not angered by a personal insult I'm angered that on a men's rights board guys are oking sexual assaults by women when the same people believe infringements against women are sacrosanct. It shows how difficult a task we have if even on a men's rights board men think women's welfare is 10 times more important than mens.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 09:06 AM
0

Then up vote me so there won't be shit at the top of the post!
/r/MensRights05/06/17 09:00 AM
0

If you're calling MRA's "misogynist cunts" its a good sign you're on the wrong board. A misogynist is just a man who believes in equality and doesn't honour women's victim card.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 08:00 AM
0

Good post Mgtowuk. Once we stop fearing being called names these names won't have any power over us. Laughing at the word "misogyny" will water down its stigma. Once we accept as MRA's we're outcasts we're not part of society will we start getting anywhere.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 07:53 AM
10

Very few ordinary people have sympathy for this woman. If a woman plays her victim card against a man his life is distroyed this is the real issue.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 07:45 AM
1

There are some amount of idiots on this board. You're OKing sexual assaults by women. It highlights how men's issues are dismissed versus the sanctity of women's rights. Your conclusion with that vague nonsense that "both sides have work to do" is just dismissing it as not important.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 07:34 AM
0

My echo chamber? This is a men's rights board so presumably I'm not the only one who believes in equality for men.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 07:24 AM
-6

He started off by saying this double standard makes sense which means he's OKing it.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 07:23 AM
-6

Idiot you're saying double standards against men make sense your oking this why are you on a men's rights board? This is a serious issue to many men given it happens to guys in night clubs but if guys did the same to women they'd be brutalized by the system.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 07:22 AM
40

Just because you don't mind this doesn't mean other men don't mind. She's obviously flaunting her feminine privilege surely it should anger you even from that point of view. Regardless of any evolutionary arguments both genders should be given the same importance. Its idiotic hearing these arguments ina mensrights site.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 10:26 PM
2

We should welcome women who say "all men are pigs" at least they're honest. Its the professional victims we really need to be concerned about, its the women who play men off against each other while pretending to like men are the real problem.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 11:04 PM
1

Think we need to stop worrying about being called misogynist and start demanding the equality that society is always talking about. When we start crying when people call us misogynist we're giving fuel to their charge.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 10:17 PM
1

The importance of all of this that you can't grasp for some reason is that if the accusers are to be anonymous, then making the accused anonymous also makes sense. This would help prevent the falsely accused from being damaged. I'd rather neither be anonymous, but if one is anonymous, they both should be. We also need to think tactically retard. Naming the accused is working in our favour idiot. Stop spamming us please with your verbose nonsense, with friends like you who needs ememies.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 10:12 PM
1

What is the importance of your point other than you're trying to sink this mensrights subredit in a swamp of pointless comments?
/r/MensRights28/05/17 08:18 AM
3

Yea agreed we certainly wouldn't allow men to clean women's rest rooms where women and girls were changing or naked.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 02:34 PM
0

No brainless they put the names in the paper. What about those premiership players in England that all the fuss was about. That helped generate some interest in false allegations. Did you even think about what you wrote it made no sense whatsoever.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 08:40 PM
0

Why do you fools get all worked up about a girl who was sexually abused. There's enough to get worked up about them. How about you get worried about boys instead given this is a men's rights board. And it turns out even she doesn't believe she was sexually assaulted so again why would you worry?
/r/MensRights15/05/17 08:38 PM
2

the last thing we need is the accused getting annonymity, we want the public to know that men are being bullied by the system.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 03:18 PM
1

This is so sad attacking some odd ball like Lena Dunham because we're afraid to attack the real power female victimhood.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 02:12 PM
1

A better comparision would be if it was his younger brother in which case we wouldn't care. We don't need to contribute to the obsession with female victimhood.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 01:44 PM
1

Its more of sexual curiosity its irrevelant unless we want historical sex charges against kids for playing doctor. And give her sister is a female its not like we're helping the cause of men by reinforcing the obsession about female victimhood. Not sure why there's always this obsession on here about Lena Dunham. Its the anti male system we need to be challenging, by challenging her we're not challenging the system, she's hated by the mainstream anyway. People just pick her as an easy target and…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 01:41 PM
1

I don't aggree we have to tear up the female victim card once and for all otherwise women can always play men against each other. No better way of waking men up than falsely accusing them of a sex crime.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 11:55 AM
2

Maybe if more men are subject to false allegations then more of them will wake up. The whole system is so powerful in cultivating our nuturing instinct towards women that men have to experience being severely bullied by the system to be woken up.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 11:53 AM
0

It would only be a salient point if she had groped her younger brother. In actual fact you're reinforcing the hysteria about female victimhood. Anyway we need to aim higher than this silly woman who most people hate anyway.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 10:57 AM
1

Why do we need to be obsessed with female victimhood, that's the reall enemy.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 08:01 AM
0

Your "genius" retort might be more fitting if it was her brother who was molested. Anyway she hardly molested anyone it was the equivalent to playing doctors. Are we starting a witch hunt against kids who played doctor now? Don't know why this trainwreck attracks so much attention anyway if someone like her is hated by the mainstream conservatives its a clue that we need to set our sights a bit higher. Like the purveyors of female victimhood. Unwittingly you,re just reinforcing female victimhood…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 07:58 AM
1

Yea there are huge assumptions everywhere about the greater importance of women's welfare with respect to men. And its amazing the disregard women have for their male friends/relatives the way they play them against other men.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 06:46 AM
1

The sad thing is even you believe in this myth of white male privilege!
/r/MensRights15/05/17 06:38 AM
1

And of course the presentation demeans men and makes light of circumcision which has always been the main weapon of those defending circumcision.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 10:19 PM
-8

Its likely some moronic troll who's anti men's rights. This couldn't possibly be a genuine men's rights issue. FFS he's talking about young girls visiting the mum's-boys night. Who ever heard of this Mum-boys night anyway?
/r/MensRights06/05/17 04:10 PM
22

You should have taken a case against them, its something I'd contribute to. This is the most offensive biggotry of all assuming a man can't change a daughter's nappy without raping them.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 04:07 PM
4

How is this misandric allowed to post insults with impunity with biggoted statements like "teach men not to rape babies" as if by default we rape babies if unless thought not to.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 04:04 PM
1

You got there before me we can't help guys who're this stupid.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 10:32 AM
1

You wrote: "We should call out the bullshit."
/r/MensRights25/04/17 10:12 PM
2

Sure manspreading is a more easy to understand topic but its hardly a critical issue. We have to start down voting or banning these manspreading discussions.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 02:14 PM
2

We don't know even if she is an asshole she looks a bit dazed too spaced out to see what she's doing. But the real idiots are us on Mensrights who've spend 1,000's of man hours on this woman who just happened to be a little dozey some day. Can we have a moratorium on these manspreading discussions nothing is coming out of this.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 02:12 PM
0

No some guys ARE assholes and spread their legs and take over someone elses seat just because they're too ignorant to think of the person next to them.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 02:01 PM
1

You're arguing as if I said he should be fired or as if someone here said he should be fired. And woman's victimhood is so powerful its important for us to support some man who challenges it even though this wouldn't necessarily be the argument we would make ourselves.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 11:02 AM
1

I haven't said we should fire him you're completely confused here. I'm arguing we should support one of the few men who'll challenge their victimhood.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 10:22 PM
1

We do stand for it do we say a groping of a guys genitals is rape.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 10:07 PM
66

How do you know she's going to flip out on you?? Its ridiculous that mensrights subreddit is clogged with these non issues when the real issue is men are raised to believe men are less important than women. When men get attacked by police and thrown out of their homes or get falsely accused of all sorts of things. We've alot to discuss but its always clogged up with this manspreading womanspreading bagspreading nonsense.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 10:00 PM
1

I blame idiots like you for our problems not women. I can't make it simplier than this idiot. If men think women's welfare is always sacred then women will always win.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 05:28 PM
1

Thats theoretical bullshit. What happens in practice is women use their victim card to play men against each other. We will only have a level playing field and be able to reason objectively when we tear up women's victim card.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 05:17 PM
1

An asshole like you should be kicked off this board with the anti men comments you've made.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 05:11 PM
2

More importantly we have to give up thinking women's victimhood is sacred only then will we ever make progress. And one of the few figures with a position in authority to do so we knock him..
/r/MensRights19/04/17 05:11 PM
1

We'll never get anywhere retardo if we hold women's victimhood as sacred. Then the first person to have the courage to do this we knock him. This is a mensrights subreddit if you hadn't noticed.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 05:00 PM
1

Look idiot if a man had his genitals groped by a woman most would laugh it off. Why is it we're supposed to treat women's welfare as sacred then??
/r/MensRights19/04/17 04:50 PM
1

A translation would be useful: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.milenio.com%2Fcultura%2Funam-marcelino_perello-situacion_laboral-sentido_contrario-rector-milenio_noticias_0_940705958.html For some reason it doesn't allow me to copy and paste the text so I've posted a link to it.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 04:45 PM
2

Do you want to elaborate on what you're trying to say???
/r/MensRights19/04/17 04:39 PM
2

Yea agreed it looks like we're saying a man being raped or sexually assaulted is funny.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 11:14 AM
1

Have you done a search on Introduction to Men's Rights. Some videos. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLvhxFKtE6qiSo9iNDgroYCGmL92HctCDI But I suppose you'll have to narrow it down further.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 07:07 PM
9

Yea we're starting to recognise where female teachers are caught in bed with their teenage pupils. The main stream media has picked up on this for a while but what about where women notably young baby sitters sexually assault young boys but get away with saying they were checking if he wet himself. Society hasn't yet started to recognise babysitter sexual assault of young boys.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 08:51 AM
1

Is this supposed to be anti women or pro women. So as a criticism of women you're saying mothers are too protective of their children. What about where women physically abuse children? What about female babysitters sexually grope young boys. What about mothers play sons off against each other. Is this meant to be a reddit discussing the faults of women or just another board on how great women are.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 08:45 AM
20

This shows up the double standards as much as anything else. Male victims of sexual assault are the subject of ridicule. Men are regularly sexually assaulted by women in nightclubs but nothing is done about it. You'd be laughed at if you tried to report it to the police.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 06:44 PM
1

Notice we're starting to sex crimes committed by women but this is where its against other women we're still not a the stage where we fully recognise equally sex crimes by women against men/boys. Eg women often grope guys genitals in night clubs but the reverse would be considered a sex crime. And we recognise where a woman has sleeps with a boy but not where she groups a young boy, this is concealed as checking he didn't pee himself.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 07:49 PM
1

Haven't you ever opened a newspaper in your life. If a guy groped a woman's groin area that would be a sexual assault and he'd go before court for it. So why not where a woman gropes a man sexually?
/r/MensRights18/05/16 01:38 PM
1

Good point what about cases where women groped the genitals of male dancers from stories I've read this is very high. This should be regarded as a sexual assault.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 01:35 PM
1

I agree it's annoying that she has privacy but that's the way it works all thoughout society her feelings are far more important.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 09:31 PM
1

You're missing the point. Chivalry is the key reason women are winning the sex war and they're now trying to enforce it legally.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 11:27 AM
3

Is a lot worse than that. Chivalry is hatred pure and simple, hatred of your fellow men. By chivalry I'm not talking about holding the door open for something I'm talking about the religion of female victimhood where women's victimhood is treated as 20 times more important than men. This inevitably leads to attacks against innocent men. This happens all the time, girl insults boy, boy insults girl back, chivalries step in and feel society expects them to attack the guy. Where this female victim …
/r/MensRights08/04/16 11:26 AM
2

Ok I understand you're advocating special stalls however thats not likely what will happen in practice. Unlikely schols are going to suddenly invest in changing all the toilets in the country. Likely boys will be expected to use urinals and will be made to get used to it and endure the humiliation.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 10:16 AM
1

Yea I agree its more humiliating to guys than anything. I don't see why some guys think this is some sort of victory when most guys prefer vaginas to penises.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 08:11 AM
1

Is this meant to be a piss take judging by your other comments. Why would abuse of boys be funny surely you're on the wrong board.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 07:57 AM
2

The problem is boys will have to use the urinals.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 07:50 AM
2

The expectation would be for boys to have to use the urinals.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 07:50 AM
1

Are you retarded or something. Surely it would be a bigger abuse of his rights if she's able to watch him going to the toilet.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 07:43 AM
-27

Girls are able to play with bananas maybe it would make the boys more comfortable to have some vaginas to lick out. Look tasty anyway mmm wouldn't mind getting my nose in that. Relax its hardly a real story feminists are over guarded about their vaginas anyway if they were getting them licked out they wouldn't be so uptight.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 07:37 AM
4

This article is light on details, but gender neutral toilets are great and have proven successful in UK schools already. Or are they considered successful because boys haven't complained. Boys can hardly complain afterall because they'd be accused of having a small penis or being gay. Boys or men can't have feelings in our culture.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 03:31 PM
1

macaroniinapan I gather you're a vagina holder which probably explains why you're belittling this issue. The culture as you put it is insignificant compared to boys being sexually humiliated.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 03:17 PM
0

Why is it a great idea if boys are sexually humiliated?? Could you clarify your answer bearing in mind this is a men's rights board.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 02:59 PM
1

Well, that would solve the problem all right - thanks for the clarification. What age are you?? Sasha says the only place she's ever seen gender neutral toilets was at the BBC HQ in london. Do you really believe that the facilities which exist in BBC HQ are going to exist in every childrens bathroom in the country especially in underprivileged schools. Do you think every child will have a seperate unit with a sink, drying machine and mirrors etc which he mentions below?? If you are interested in…
/r/MensRights06/04/16 02:55 PM
2

I've never noticed shit on women's toilets not sure what you're on about. What about the fact that boys have to urinate infront of girls. Isn't that humiliating to them?
/r/MensRights06/04/16 11:46 AM
3

Why would being gender neutral mean you'd have shit and piss on your toilet seat.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 11:30 AM
7

Each will have a seperate lockable unit with their own toilet, sink, drying machine and mirrors????????? Now Sasha do you really think every poor school which is drastically underfunded is going to be just like BBC HQ in London. An organisation which gets billions of free money. I think you're joking here just trying to wind people up.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 11:27 AM
0

Until we get rid of chivalry and guys watching a situation can either intervene to stop violence when it's the girl being violent OR can recognize that a violent woman has earned the violent response and doesn't 'white knight' then women can't learn to be responsible about it. Can you stop making pointless convoluted statements you're wasting eyeball space. We just need to destroy chivalry especially chivalry types. We need to give women the equality they deserve.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 09:22 AM
1

mwobuddy I'm not sure its worth arguing with TedTheAtheist he's an anti you'll never persuade him. He's just there to annoy and frustrate other posters. MRA's are acting for equal treatment by the law and look at what he types: How do you think this can ever change? Aside from AI taking over and laying down the law equally? This subreddit is being spammed by antis who just annoy serious posters we should be doing something about it.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 08:57 AM
1

Our main problem is other men especially chivalry types. Examples like this might help change a few guys minds.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 12:08 PM
56

This is really troubling lots of MRA’s don’t get why this is to do with Men’s rights. Its important that we start thinking so we can really challenge the system. Western culture tells boys from an early age that they must man up. It tells them they must respect women and never hit them. Thus here the boy can’t defend himself from a girl. Worse still when he does try to defend himself he’s attacked by a chivalry do gooder. We must challenge this chivalry system at the core if we’re ever to get an…
/r/MensRights05/04/16 10:57 AM
8

I'll spell it out for you if you're that slow. Boys are though from an early age that they have to man up and not care about their feelings. And they're thought they have to have a lot of respect for girls even in this case to the point of not being able to defend himself against an attack. And after he defends himself some chivalry type feels he has to defend her. And after he defends himself he is wracked by guilt. If you don't get why this is a men's rights issue why are you here.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 10:26 AM
1

No we're talking about genitalia. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3426104/Privates-parade-War-Peace-fans-left-shocked-BBC-s-Tolstoy-adaptation-takes-racier-twist-frontal-male-nudity-soldier-scene.html Can you name some films which have pictures of vaginas unless your watching the porn channel which doesn't count. Neither does a bit of bush count.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 10:19 PM
1

"She thinks that we should be moving to a “four toilet set up” – women, men, gender neutral and disabled: “Giving people choice is always a good thing, along with giving women the ability to have more privacy if they wish to be away from men." may Trans people should have respect for men if they want respect from men.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 10:44 PM
1

"She thinks that we should be moving to a “four toilet set up” – women, men, gender neutral and disabled: “Giving people choice is always a good thing, along with giving women the ability to have more privacy if they wish to be away from men." Maybe trans people should have respect for men if they want respect from men.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 10:41 PM
1

What would you want to have to piss with women coming in watching you??
/r/MensRights04/02/16 10:37 PM
1

. Since men and media are never going to stop objectifying women at every turn. At least they could make men objectified at the same rate. When was the last time you saw a half naked man suggestively eating something as promotion for a new item at a food joint? Never. Media had been catching up to showing both genders cleaning and parenting (though not quite the same rate, but it's progress!) so the least they can do is portray both equally as sex objects. I'd like to say th When last did you se…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 03:50 PM
1

Yea it pretends to be liberated and daring but are terrified of actually being so they show us a penis. If they really wanted to be liberated they could show us some vagina but are terrified of actually challenging female victimhood hegemony. You can ring up and complain asking for equal female genital nudity to balance this out. Problem is many English guys are so manipulated by English women they’re convinced they’re happy to see a penis.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 10:53 PM
1

Look plixxir if you want members here to give you advice you have to make it clear what you were accused of saying. You've written a rediculously long description but left out the important piece.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 05:36 PM
-1

I was hoping someone wouldn't say that that just shows how backward some MRA's still are. Saying your against some daft people isn't the same as being proMRA is it? Many of the daftess radfems are actually quite useful to us. Some of his videos may sound good to some but that's because he's chooses the easiest opposition. He has an obsession about Anita Sarkeesian. Where has he actually expressed some proMRA sentiment?
/r/MensRights15/10/15 01:21 PM
0

Why do MRA's look up to him. Can someone show me any video where he's expressed proMRA sentiments. Mostly he's anti MRA.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 09:45 AM
1

it also creates an imaginary picture of the women who does not poop, is kinder than a men, deserves more attention, shouldn't be offended by holding her responsible, should not embarrassed if she farts in public. Bad because I believe that when a police officers get a call from the dispatcher about domestic violence, I believe in 90% of the time they assume that there is a male perpetrator. Bad because I believe in most of the cases there are mostly male judges and jury members who are giving le…
/r/MensRights15/10/15 07:16 AM
1

ill look at it as a ludicrous thing since he wasn't penetrated and raped, and so they will tell themselves that they have more serious cases Thats what we're trying to change here. And it won't start changing until we start making complaints to police. If you don't care what are you doing here.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 07:14 AM
1

Nothing foggy about it at all. Are you saying chivalry is a good thing or not. Its a very simple question.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 08:27 PM
1

Secondly if a woman was sexually assaulted no one would talk about next time as if the first time should be forgotten about. They’d talk about solving this time.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 01:30 PM
1

Firstly do you realise you are contradicting yourself: First you say: “Till women will experience the advantages of chivalry (e.g. white knights, more empathy for women), most of them won't realize it is a privilege.” Then you say: “They can only realize it is a privilege if it's all gone.” Which is it??????
/r/MensRights05/10/15 01:29 PM
1

I was very impressed with derpylord’s posts . Very insightful pinpointing education of men as our main obstacle especially at such a young age and I really admire how proactive he is in calling for a meeting. While he is a bit over cautious greater confidence will come with time. I was very wary of saying anything relating men’s rights at this age given the almost universal condemnation of any seeming like criticism of women.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 08:55 PM
1

Hi I’m in London as well, I believe we need to be meeting up. Heartening to read your message, your approach very enlightened especially given you’re just starting college, your assessment spot on this is more about education rather than any kind of protesting. Definitely would like to meet up sometime soon I’m in London also could meet up up in central London I’ve sent you a pm.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 08:53 PM
1

White Knights are the central issue they must be challenged or we'll get no where.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 06:09 PM
1

Surely mods shouldn't allow shit like this here.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 01:00 PM
1

nstantly when I was a bouncer, even a few times to me while I was working. We kicked out far more women than men during my ti But if you grabbed her by the crotch you'd spend many years in jail.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 12:50 PM
1

to grab her wrist when she wants to grab on the family jewels, turn your back on her and walk away. If needed walk to the exit, if she follows you tell the bouncers. I bet they will laugh their ass off, but who knows. You can ask the club for security f Why are you on an MRA subreddit talking about next time do this??? Don't you think you're missing the point of the whole point. Why is it when a woman is sexually assaulted the whole world rallies around her but if a man is sexually assaulted by …
/r/MensRights10/09/15 12:46 PM
1

I would qualify my comment by saying its based on their being many incidents per day of female janitors walking in during the day while guys are using the urinals. If it was just one incident per day and after 6 pm then you might decide its not worth it. If one or two incidents during the day you might just request that women follow the procedure of announcing themselves before they enter as per Jtaylor’s and jimmy’s suggestions so demonstrating you are a flexible constructive person.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 01:46 PM
5

It doesn't just have the potential for future problems its a big problem right now. Many men don't like having women watching them go to the toilet especially when the reverse case of women having to pee in front of men would never be tolerated.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 08:48 PM
2

Because a woman is watching me go to the toilet. Not sure what is the point of:"expecially if they are just there to et something out of the closet?" It wouldn't change the fact of a woman seeing me go to the toilet. Likely she'd be screaming rape in a reverse situation. Did you notice this is the MensRights subredit.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 08:44 PM
3

Most men's rights issues are a tad petty to men. That's the whole point that's what we're trying to change.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 11:45 AM
4

Would women have to pee with men watching them watching them in the workplace? If there was such a situation it would sure be on the nightly news until it was changed. This isn’t some sort of health and safety issue at work. The whole point is that men’s feelings are belittled that men have to man up.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 11:29 AM
1

That's the whole point I think. We don't think our petty needs are worth complaining about. For a man to complain it has to be a major financial issue or the needs of kids or the womenfolk.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 11:05 AM
6

Are you saying women are walking in while men are using the urinal? I believe this is a real issue, I’d find it humiliating if I had to use the urinal in front of women. Taking the issue to HR and saying it’s a violation of privacy or a humiliation is a creditable approach. There surely are some rules about not subjecting employees to humiliating circumstances especially if it happens many times a day. It’s an interesting case to take given normally men’s privacy issues are dismissed. It goes to…
/r/MensRights11/08/15 10:50 AM
1

s sexual consent and compliance, but gains it through deception or fraudulent statements or actions. The media may also refer to this type of rape as "rape by fraud", "rape by im Its depends killing someone because you can't get pussy is a bit Elliot Rodger but we'll have to kill some white knights before the word gets out to stop stabbing us in the back, before the word gets out there aren't easy points for chivalry.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 05:22 PM
1

women, it's not because we don't respect women. Society as a whole does respect women, no matter how often feminists tell you otherwise. The only result of this sort of rhetoric is the portrayal of women as victims and men as their oppressors. That portrayal being precisely how they are able to remove our rights. Thanks Francois_Rapiste glad someone can see this, see my comment above. How are we ever going to get anywhere if we don’t see the subtlety of women and the problem we’re in.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 02:33 PM
0

AJmcfly, You were right first time, learn to trust your instincts. It’s far worse than a badge saying “I hate men” or “Respect us you male scum”. If she said that at least you might have some respect for her she’d be being honest. It’s far more insidious than that. It means we’re poor abused women.. We’re victims honour my victimhood my victimhood can’t be challenged. It plays men off against each other saying you must defend me from other men. There’s no point in telling men that abuse women to…
/r/MensRights12/07/15 02:18 PM
2

"I do have a problem with chivalry unless it is reciprocated." Chivalry by definition can't be reciprocated. Chivalry isn't just about holding the door open. Chivalry is where men's identity is defined by sacrificing their interests for women.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 07:36 PM
1

Just saw this I agree we have to start meeting up. I'm in London, I guess the weekend is the best time for all. If the weather is fine it might be best to meet in a park and sit around and chat exchange contract details etc. Please suggest a place or contact me [email protected].
/r/MensRights02/06/15 05:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter