TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MensHour Archive

View 2 posts and 35 comments by MensHour on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
46

GeneralMensHour/r/MensRights14/08/25 06:02 AM
19

Activism/SupportMensHour/r/MensRights20/06/25 02:37 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

LLMs are trained by the same kind of people who run Google and social media. They’re left leaning. So ChatGPT is woke. Try asking it about Trump or Biden or trans issues.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 05:17 PM
2

Not so much fictional but it’s the incel = anti women shooter/terrorist and anyone who criticises feminism must be an incel (celibate because no woman would ever want them). Seen that idea in the 1990s (although not the word incel)
/r/MensRights02/09/25 09:04 PM
16

I’m an older British man. I’ll give you my ideas as someone who’s watched Feminism for the last 50 years. First of all, it’s a Marxist philosophy. Some even call themselves Marxist Feminists. They looking for who the good guy is - women - the oppressed- they are all without fault / victims. They are looking for who the bad guy is - men - the oppressors- they are unspeakable bad, totally evil. Think of Stalin and if a peasant farmer had one horse he didn’t work for it. He must have stolen it or c…
/r/MensRights23/08/25 07:57 AM
10

Basically everything was fine for men and boys (it wasn’t) and somehow we helped girls but boys got pushed aside. This is nothing to do with any group or policy at all so they shouldn’t listen to anyone who says otherwise (Andrew Tate for example). This is bad not because it affects boys in any way. It’s only bad if it affects girls.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 05:49 AM
5

Obama: Progressives made a 'mistake' in talking about what's wrong with boys - transcript When we don't think about boys and and just assume they're going to be okay because they've been running the world and you know they've got all the advantages relative to the girls and all of which has historically been true in all kinds of ways. But precisely because of that, if you're not thinking about what's happening to boys and how are they being raised then that can actually hurt women. And and I wou…
/r/MensRights23/08/25 05:45 AM
1

There’s a film about a fashion designer who is poisoned by mushrooms, Phantom Thread. It’s reported like this “This 2017 drama, directed by Paul Thomas Anderson, stars Daniel Day-Lewis as Reynolds Woodcock, a renowned and demanding haute couture dressmaker in 1950s London. His life takes a turn when he meets and becomes romantically involved with Alma (Vicky Krieps), who also becomes his muse. As their relationship develops, Alma, frustrated with Reynolds' controlling behavior, intentionally poi…
/r/MensRights19/08/25 02:59 PM
1

The strange thing is that it is actually illegal. It is covered by the various acts that say you can’t do anything to a child unless needed for medical reasons but judges have a hedge round it. They said things like we didn’t prosecute it before so it’s not illegal.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 02:54 PM
4

I think you just answered the question. You mentioned Atomic Blonde. It was a failure commercially. If you hijack a male hero and replace it with a female heroine, then you get some fall out from that. Ballerina is a case in point.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 02:45 PM
6

You could just as easily to a similar chart for women, especially if you include all the child abuse, elder abuse, domestic violence and violence and murder in general that are done by women. And let’s add in abortions. The real truth is we are the same species. Often women ratify bad men’s actions if they benefit. Dictators and drug dealers have wives and girlfriends but she can always claim she didn’t know he was so bad even when it was obvious. You only get a real answer to this if you ask a …
/r/MensRights18/08/25 12:55 AM
3

I think it wasn’t uncontested in those days and didn’t infest everything but the start was well under way. In 1970 feminists attack the Miss World contest which has never been the same again. In 1971 I think it was Erin Pizzey’s domestic violence shelter (World’s first ever) was hijacked by feminists who wouldn’t tolerate her idea that some women were as violent as the men they were fleeing. 1979 Margaret Thatcher came to power and proved that women can handle power but she was conservative. It …
/r/MensRights16/08/25 06:30 PM
9

Women choose the guy who is badass out there. They don’t want him to be badass with them. Nice guys are uninteresting and seen as losers. When she says I want a guy who’s caring and listens she omits she wants a guy who acts like a killer outside, whether Wall St or drug dealing, but comes home and is then caring and listens but if push comes to shove she’ll pick the killer outside but complain he’s not caring and doesn’t listen.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 03:07 AM
19

All of them even the Chinese one are trained by wokies. They are all intertwined too. Apple Intelligence includes ChatGPT in part. Others do too. They are also prissy and judgemental. Ask them about any unusual sex acts they refuse. Ask them to produce an image similar to Scarlett Johansen they refuse to “copy” her image. I wasn’t asking that, just good looking and shapely. I asked about a German message ending which was “bizarre greetings” and you get told not to use that. I wasn’t. I noticed, …
/r/MensRights15/08/25 02:50 AM
17

I’d say 50 years. Women’s Lib was 1970s and was essentially bored middle class housewives. This was taken over by Marxist Feminists who started the men bad thing. This became the excuse any woman but stereotype all men if one is bad. Apart from claiming there are no male victims because they are the same sex at the perpetrators they also ignore female on male violence but the real giveaway is that they are totally silent on women on women violence.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 02:22 AM
5

According to FIDE Chess ratings Yifan Hou of China is the world’s best woman. She is ranked 142. 1-141 being men.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 10:48 AM
5

The law on entrapment in the UK is less rigid. The police would argue you would have committed the “crime” with any woman jogger. In any case, if it’s more than a lecture it’s can be a fine. Going to court to get £80, about $100, back is difficult and you could lose and then get a bigger sentence.
/r/MensRights13/08/25 05:13 PM
17

Since the law is basically enforced by a woman making a complaint and then the police “investigating the crime” no man can bring a charge. There are now at least one plain clothes group of police women jogging with a backup team to detain and lecture, if no charge involved, men who whistle or shout out at them. Even the police concerned say it’s often not a crime but apparently they’re not busy with anything else as Britain is well known as a crime free country (LOL)
/r/MensRights13/08/25 04:15 PM
1

This child of a marriage is the fathers started I think around the time of Napoleon in Europe when men could be away at war for months or even years and if they came back to a baby it was counted as theirs. That’s the price of marriage. It makes less sense these days now people are cohabiting and illegitimacy isn’t frowned on and also we have DNA tests. Nowadays feminists resist ideas like that. Notably there’s been no studies that I know of since the 70s and the rise of “women’s lib” about how …
/r/MensRights11/08/25 12:06 AM
1

Where do you live? I’m in the UK. Questioning women is “misogynistic”. Questioning Muslims in “Islamophobic”. I’ve been out on the streets for men’s rights, fathers rights and free speech. The government and the media, including the BBC (#DefundtheBBC), paint us all as “far right thugs”. Never been a thug in my life. Protests against mass immigration go unreported. Many buy the Government/media line. The rest of us try our best to counter it. If you live in a country where the Government and med…
/r/MensRights30/07/25 10:09 AM
30

For legal protection, consult a lawyer. Assuming he says no chance in a civil case get him to take your statement and hold it. If anything comes up he can produce a prior statement.
/r/MensRights28/07/25 08:07 PM
3

One other thing. Don’t know what jurisdiction you’re in but again possibly an uphill battle but the feminists love the civil case. A person could be liable and have to pay you compensation. A gamble but maybe worth it? (It’s how they got Trump and many others. Women often get believed on balance of probability. It’s your word against hers)
/r/MensRights28/07/25 08:02 PM
85

Don’t go to general support lines. They are often feminist/female run and have this all men want it narrative. Look for male sexual abuse or domestic abuse lines. They will at least be sympathetic and may help. Have you considered the police. Probably an uphill battle to even be taken seriously but could be good for you even if refused.
/r/MensRights28/07/25 07:59 PM
186

Assuming you’re in the UK the Sexual Offences Act 2003 says you require a penis to be guilty of rape. Women raping is called “Causing a person to engage in sexual activity without consent” as if a lesser crime and no doubt gets light sentences if any prosecutions are actually brought. As for victim support it’s unclear there is any. Search for mens sexual abuse orgs. I suspect the victims helplines wouldn’t be much use.
/r/MensRights28/07/25 07:49 PM
4

Basically you can’t get this point across because you’re dealing with a religious zealot or feminist/Marxist equivalent thereof. She wants to believe this. It’s almost her reason for being. Anything goes wrong it’s not her fault. She’s been oppressed. Anything wrong for men, such as high suicide rate, that’s their fault and their problem and no-one should do anything about it because that would help the Patriarchy. Anything wrong for women it’s oppression and we need a Government program for it …
/r/MensRights03/07/25 07:39 AM
8

They think their cleaning standard is an absolute in their mind, not an opinion. I’ve said that if I ever live with a woman again and she wants to clean the living room once an hour whether it needs it or not, I’ll volunteer to clean it once a year whether it needs it or not. Perhaps we might compromise but not if they think their standards are the ones to work to. That would qualify as controlling behaviour and be illegal some places. As for “emotional labour” that used to be called being nosey…
/r/MensRights26/06/25 10:57 PM
5

Until the 1960s and the pill of a woman had sex she might have had a baby. She wanted and still does a man to provide for her while she looked after the children. The only women who routinely didn’t have to work to support the family were middle class women. When we’ve got universal education it means that once the children got to a reasonable age they went to school for about 6 hours. This left the middle class women bored during the day. Marxist Feminists told they could have it all. Work and …
/r/MensRights20/06/25 10:43 AM
11

Basically feminism is men bad - women good and always has been. The women’s libbers, so called second wave, were originally bored middle class housewives but then Marxist Feminists interceded. I become red-pilled because I wanted to help women. In 1987 I bought a book called Women Against Violence Against Women. It said it was women openly discussing violence against them. I was thinking what can we do about this problem? It turns out I couldn’t do anything at all. I was part of the problem. I d…
/r/MensRights20/06/25 01:22 AM
4

This goes back to women’s liberation, now retrospectively called 2nd wave feminism. They started with the Marxist Feminist idea that women are oppressed by men. Everything was men’s fault even when we hadn’t done anything. The bias to DV and partner murders being male on female. It not only ignores gay or lesbian violence but women’s increasing violence. There’s also gamma bias as documented by the Men’s Psychology Network in the UK. Man dies - played down - maybe even his fault or he deserved i…
/r/MensRights12/06/25 07:28 PM
43

This is not society. This has been the MSM, politicians and activist propaganda for about 50 years. Many who are red-pilled or other pill and can’t unsee what they see. Women are not angels and men are not devils. Most of this propaganda came from Marxist Feminists in the 70s. They were looking to tell us how oppressed they were. Some were lesbian separatists saying men are terrible, come and sleep with me. They were like all Marxists looking to see who was oppressed and therefore virtuous victi…
/r/MensRights05/06/25 02:28 AM
10

This demonic (without the scare quotes) view of men mostly comes from the Marxist Feminists of the 70s. See my reply to the OP.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 02:25 AM
5

It’s a feminist. Chances of there being actual evidence are minimal and even if any is offered go through it with a fine tooth comb. As has been pointed out they to be contrasting 4 years only where 2 of longer sentences with a female victim and 2 of longer sentences with a male victim. How was it both before and after this period? You might also need to see the numbers because it might turn out a small number of convictions relating to male victims is being compared to a large number of convict…
/r/MensRights12/05/25 11:47 PM
2

The history of feminism is basically women getting off the Titanic and complaining of the male privilege of the drowning men.
/r/MensRights10/05/25 04:20 PM
1

I’d like to add that one lawyers website in the UK offers a sexual abuse calculator that finds how much you could receive when claiming compensation for various types of sexual abuse.
/r/MensRights10/05/25 09:09 AM
1

There’s two things to this. One is the publicity and the other is compensation. The newspapers blazed the salacious details of the accusation often prominently, maybe even front page. TV news too, perhaps first item. The suspect is named. The alleged victim is anonymous. If the suspect is found not guilty or even if the case is dropped for whatever reason the acquittal may not even make it somewhere in the back of the paper or on TV. Feminists insist he should not be given anonymity. Compensatio…
/r/MensRights10/05/25 07:24 AM
4

There’s no requirement for you to even be present, let alone have sex, consensual or not. I remember the case of Brett Kavanaugh, Supreme Court Judge. He apparently did something at a party 20 years previously. No evidence was offered. No proof he even went to the party.
/r/MensRights10/05/25 07:11 AM
5

This is a reality in Britain. I’m not sure it’s much better in the USA. I saw one US case where a guy spent 6 years in jail and then she said she made it up. No punishment for perjury. I’ve seen figures as high as 33% are mistakes and 33% are deliberately false. Naturally feminists dispute high figures. Even David Lisak 2010 couldn’t get the figures lower than 6% being false and he only got them that low by ignoring cases where they could have just done it. For example, if the alleged perpetrato…
/r/MensRights09/05/25 10:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter