TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mental_Opening_6625 Archive

View 0 posts and 22 comments by Mental_Opening_6625 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Not exactly irrational. Men are expected to perform all the tougher, alienated jobs without much human contact which makes them more prone to suicidal depression. A migrant daily wage worker, indebted farmer or army vet commiting suicide is all due to default gendered expectations we have of male provider-protectors. It can sometimes be as basic as a guy choosing to drive long even when his SO is in better physiological state and getting into an accident. Crime plays a functional role when a wea…
/r/MensRights19/06/26 02:06 PM
1

Yeah but replace that time with whatever job you do and I'd choose the kid in a heartbeat. Besides, you can multitask when dealing with children. Watch a match. Play a game. Read a book. Go on a walk with them. Play with their toys. Educating your kid is endlessly hilarious and rewarding. Its evolutionary that we find kids cute and their happiness makes us happy too (as it does for monkeys and whales and birds). Meanwhile, I don't know if you've licked out with an enjoyable job, but most jobs on…
/r/MensRights18/06/26 01:56 PM
3

Not really. Pakistan is an army state and pretty fundamental. We're used to normalizing conscription expectations and the somewhat militarisation of society itself and only view religion in how it controls women, when it has placed plenty of restrictions on guys too. Look at how LeT operates: a charity which will save your family and then expect you to join a violent organisation that's mostly happy to sacrifice you. Also, men are the primary victims in the wars with Afghanistan, in Balochistan,…
/r/MensRights18/06/26 01:27 PM
3

Without Harry and Ron, Hermione would be dead in the first book and petrified in the second. Hermione has basically never saved his life on her own before the seventh year. She's only helped him save other people while getting to skip most of the terrible fights. (Many Dramione fics having her stay back for all of 7th year while Harry and Ron achieve everything anyway). Harry Potter, an orphan grew in an abusive home that made him do all domestic work seriously cutting into his basic education. …
/r/MensRights18/06/26 01:00 PM
1

Not really. They just don't have a broad social insurance in marriage and are always expected to churn out the most productive work of their timeline, from hunting to farming to coal mining to war to mechanical labour build up and repair and software programming. Give them Hypergamous social insurance or a broad strokes political one.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 12:14 PM
1

Instilling morals and rearing kids is a pretty fun activity. And routine domestic work is laughably easy if you use modern technology. Compared to that, guys are heavily exposed to market demands and doing far more mechanical and alienating labour.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 12:09 PM
1

Problem isn't that there are a lot of assholes out there. Problem is that these assholes are attractive to women like the "sexy ditz" is attractive to guys. But we don't call them "toxic feminine women" but "internalized misogynists." "Toxic masculinity" should be called "internalized misandry" too. We should learn attraction from them while simultaneously helping them overcome their hate for their own gender. This will help drive down both male labour productivity for non-misandrists and male a…
/r/MensRights18/06/26 11:39 AM
1

Not every thing is misogyny, you walking cardboard cutout. Also, there's no such thing as "society". All society is just a marketplace, where men and women are trying to sell themselves to the other using TWO strategies: "Attraction" and "Labour." "Attraction" appears hard at first, but it's far easier than lifelong endless "labour". Because it's a market, "usually" you'll be sold as a sum total of "attraction and labour". Men conventionally were only allowed labour as a choice (and women only a…
/r/MensRights18/06/26 10:58 AM
3

I think getting "society to compel the provision of resources" is spot on. However, the answer isn't "providing and protecting" women which is an endless, unrewarding duty. Instead, you want low intensity work for men with more involvement in parenting. "Toxic Masculinity" which basically means using "attraction" to bypass need for hyperproductivity is always a good idea for men. However, it should only be external and you shouldn't lose touch with your own emotions as female attraction standard…
/r/MensRights18/06/26 10:30 AM
3

They're not sabotaging mate_choices. They're instituting "harmless productive labour" to replace "attraction." What do we know for sure? 1. Women are clearly attracted to "toxic masculine" men. 2. "Toxic masculinity" is an attraction metric that lets men bypass the traditional male role of worker provider (like having a good figure and face lets you bypass needing to be a good homemaker for women). 3. Her claim that being harmless is eazzzzzy is extremely idiotic. Being harmless requires self-mo…
/r/MensRights18/06/26 10:19 AM
7

They didn't have political rights because society has always respected female honor intrinsically (Because you have to spend most of your formative years with your mother). You need to look at how slavery works and feudalism worked to get how humans actually exploit. Women were simply in a social contract where they forced men to go out and hunt for them in exchange for sexual and reproductive labour. When men had made non domestic work actually doable instead of what Napoleonic war, Coal Mining…
/r/MensRights13/06/26 11:08 PM
1

Firstly, no it's not. It majorly concerns suppressing all emotions other than the Productive Drive. "Internalized misandry" is on point, because the guy thinks he's a female_(and later family)_patronage_machine that churns out "work". It exists because for most of human history only guys were exposed to the dynamic and highly exploitative Resource Market. "Toxic masculinity" is a pretty regressive term as it always stresses more on female victims in their interactions with the dehumanized male, …
/r/EverydayMisandry12/06/26 05:06 AM
1

Man, the problem is that the vast majority of our morality revolves around a woman's honor and comfort. Meanwhile, we keep ignoring ourselves. I think sexual crimes are terrible, but they shouldn't define gender relations. Even if say 1/3 of women have been hurt by a bad guy, most guys work pretty hard to make the world a better place for women. Guys have higher libidos and they commit the majority of sexual crimes. That libido also makes us extremely efficient labourers for women. Sexual crimes…
/r/EverydayMisandry12/06/26 03:38 AM
1

"There's no offense on Earth worse than Rape." Not death, Not overwork, Not subjugation of one's identity as protectors from Rape by waging defensive wars by childhood indoctrination of boys as protectors from rape, inhibiting even non-living eroticism (art, writing, toys, etc), curtailing language formalising intergender relations necessitating marriage for a more glorified and costlier marital sex, building structural maternal patronage systems in sacrificial religion. Rape is such a taboo tha…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/04/26 01:16 AM
3

I'll answer each one by one: 1. "How about women not being able to vote?" What does a VOTE do? What do the elected leaders DO? They redistribute primarily male labour back to households: grain, security structure, justice system etc. Think of the King/PM as a chief hunter who acts as the pyramid scheme's aispirational leader and the patronizes most women and feels glorified for doing so. What do you want, "Right to grow Grain" or "Right to Eat". Also, every "King" necessarily has a "Queen". And …
/r/EverydayMisandry18/04/26 12:48 AM
1

TLDR: All economy is Household facilitation. Nothing more, nothing less. Working in Firms is NOT the privelege that enjoying the benefits of firms' output is. Male labour has historically been completely exposed to the Free Market, which will dehumanize you unimaginably. Solved hunting? Go farm. Solved agriculture? Go build. Built cities? Go war. Won war? Go to sea. Went to sea? Go mine. Mined? Manufacture. Manufactured? Colonize raw material slave states and colonial markets. Colonized? Make co…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/04/26 11:17 PM
33

matriarchy is "partiarchy". It's only that some external work is now not very physical and we happily welcome women to it because its a joke how easy domestic work is for an organized system. We've always prioritised female and young lives, while blindly sacrificing men.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/04/26 09:22 PM
1

I'm a guy and I read Sarah J Mass: Throne of Glass 1-6 as a teenager. And a Court_of Books 1 and 2. And all 5 of Selection by Kiera Cass. And Twilight. And I read Persephone (Httyd ff) and Dramione's most read one. I can't even touch the seventh ToG book even though I've had it since it was published nor anything else except Persephone but they were all pretty good for late adolescence so I count myself lucky I read them then. Then I read Cassandra Clare and that's when I first thought that peop…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/04/26 12:36 PM
6

Because it doesn't oppress women. "Jobs" and the "Outside" were brutal thankless things and only after eons of concerted effort by men have they become slightly enjoyable. Feminists think it's all adventures and not: death by animal, death by drowning, death in war trying to protect women/get more stuff for women, death by starving, death by calculating the value of Pi to the 100th digit.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/04/26 12:11 PM
4

(6) FEMALE INFANTICIDE: Sex-selective abortions and female infanticide is just the basic selection of more efficient labour by the adult female. Most primitive societies, whether rightly or wrongly, don't consider newborns as possessed with enough consciousness to accord the value placed in female dignity. Instead, the offspring more useful to the mother is chosen. Instead, in less "enjoyable" sources of "adult" labour, 6.1.) Every form of SLAVERY is predominantly composed of men, but women are …
/r/EverydayMisandry05/04/26 11:46 AM
10

(1) On PORN: women write far far more brutal patriarchal and abusive porn where men are divided into three categories: 1.1.) The desirable PATRIARCH: whether it be the billionaire or the alpha of the pack or the jock whose quest for power has starved hm off true happiness, which only a constant supply of FMC can 1.2.) The bleached CONFORMIST: stripped of any external sexual identity, the good guys who prop up the patriarch and the FMC. 1.3.) The DEVIANTS who are killed/destroyed to validate the …
/r/EverydayMisandry05/04/26 07:49 AM
8

And they can't choose not to have their baby if the pregnancy happens without their express consent, and they're always more likely to be unprepared to be fathers, whether too young, too poor, too busy, too immature or too old.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/04/26 07:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter