| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | It's ok to be maleI would not be for the "equal rights" you describe. But that is not equal rights, equal rights is for all genders, and considering that men have it worse than women in both actual rights and representation is media, I think it is important to actively support men rights. However this does not mean I don't support equal rights. If you are only interested in the gain of one group, you are a dick. Aka radical feminists who demean men, or radical men rights activists who demean women. That is why we… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/19 08:05 PM |
| 6 | It's ok to be maleOnly those who disregard others. As stated previously, my only real point is that we should not exclude others who. If you are only interested in men rights, then you are not for equal rights, which we are. And if you are not for equal rights, you are a dick. That is my take on this matter. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/19 07:51 PM |
| 7 | It's ok to be maleBecause we are not dicks. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/19 07:48 PM |
| 5 | It's ok to be maleWe should be for both. Men have more pressing and unjust issues than women at the moment, so it is obvious to mainly focus on men issues. This should not be achieved by disregarding women, but by cooperation and understanding from everyone. We are against the current underrepresentation of men rights, but we are not for men alone, anyone should be able to join this as a safe haven where equal rights can be discussed in a civil manner. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/19 07:08 PM |
| 13 | This is actually pretty funnyWrong subreddit? | /r/MensRights | 30/12/18 11:14 AM |
| 0 | Arguments have moved from "equal pay for equal work" and are moving toward pay rises for FEMALE dominated work. Equity NOT equality.Of course it depends on the context, since context is key. In casual conversation it is fine In a professional setting you must provide evidence as to why it is better. All opinions are subjective, if you keep asking why it is better somewhere in the chain you'll find an I. Why do you think it is better? "Because the texture is better" Why? "Because I like it when my topping has a higher viscosity" Of course you could continue this chain, but this serves. But that was not the case here, he simpl… | /r/MensRights | 22/12/18 02:23 PM |
| 4 | Arguments have moved from "equal pay for equal work" and are moving toward pay rises for FEMALE dominated work. Equity NOT equality.If it isn't supported by evidence (anecdotal doesn't count), yes, because at that point you are guessing, and if you do not include the "I think" than others will think it is a fact, which is just spreading missinformation. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/18 01:38 PM |
| 24 | Arguments have moved from "equal pay for equal work" and are moving toward pay rises for FEMALE dominated work. Equity NOT equality.It isn't an opinion though, he made a statement. A statement with no evidence backing it up, if we let such behaviour go freely, this sub would slowly grow into a women hating sub, which it should not be, it should be a sub for men's rights. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/18 12:46 PM |
| 88 | Arguments have moved from "equal pay for equal work" and are moving toward pay rises for FEMALE dominated work. Equity NOT equality.Most people work like that tho, humans are masters of procrastination | /r/MensRights | 22/12/18 11:52 AM |
| 170 | Arguments have moved from "equal pay for equal work" and are moving toward pay rises for FEMALE dominated work. Equity NOT equality.Doesn't the market dictate the salaries? | /r/MensRights | 22/12/18 10:31 AM |
| 7 | Vox Thinks Men Don't Deserve Civil Rights?!?Source for women controlling household spending? | /r/MensRights | 05/11/18 06:24 AM |
| 0 | They absolutely shouldThey won't receive different treatment (I hope), because when men falsely accuse someone of raping them, they'll then also go to jail. What may happen (as is the case with most jail sentences) is that women get shorter jail time than men for the same offense. | /r/MensRights | 21/10/18 11:52 AM |
| 4 | They absolutely shouldIt’s quite possible, though impossible to prove, that the majority of women were actually against being granted the vote. Gladstone intimated as much in 1892 when he wrote that ‘there is on the part of large numbers of women who have considered the matter for themselves, the most positive objection and strong disapprobation. Is it not clear to every unbiased mind that before forcing on them what they conceive to be a fundamental change in their whole social function, that is to say in their Prov… | /r/MensRights | 21/10/18 11:47 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter