TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Metaphoricalsimile Archive

View 4 posts and 49 comments by Metaphoricalsimile on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
80

Just like a penis gets smaller if you have a lot of sex. It's the compression, you see.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/13 02:14 PM
9

Because she objects to the media portrayal of the situation? They don't quote her saying "fuck ryan gosling, I wish he had let me die" or anything like that. Oh, and you are a misogynist.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 09:35 PM
0

Wait... because feminists love it so much, but want the world to secretly think that they don't love it, they changed the wikipedia article... and nobody has changed it back? That's a fucking fantasy.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:34 AM
0

Did I say that circumcision is good because it's not as bad as FGM? No, I didn't.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:30 AM
-1

I might point out that the Wikipedia article on SCUM says that it is widely considered to be satire. It's not as widely revered as you seem to think it is.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 06:39 AM
-1

You're mistaking "logic and facts" for "things I already agree with."
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:33 AM
-3

Because everything the Spearhead posts is logical and factual? Yeah right.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:23 AM
1

Other than your sensationalized title, this has nothing to do with advancing men's rights.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 03:19 AM
-9

As a circumcised man, I can safely say that the procedure did not completely destroy my ability to experience pleasure from vaginal sexual intercourse, as FGM does. False equivalency.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 03:16 AM
0

No, this subreddit can seriously get very misogynistic. There's a reason why you've been designated a hate group by a well-known authority on hate groups.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 03:15 AM
-2

That is exactly why it's a "false equivalency" because while they're superficially similar, they are substantively different.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 03:12 AM
-5

Haha, only among your little echo chamber here.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:56 AM
5

If men want to wear pink socks, they should be able to wear pink socks. It's not evidence that they've been brainwashed by feminists. That's just stupid.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:43 AM
-22

There's a huge difference between FGM and circumcision. FGM is performed with the express purpose to deny the woman sexual pleasure for the entirety of her life. Circumcision, while certainly a backwards practice with dubious physiological benefits, does not have this effect unless there is an accident in the procedure. The very fact that these accidents happen is reason enough not to practice it, but comparing the two practices is one helluva false equivalency.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:41 AM
-7

As a bonus it has not been designated a hate group by a well-known authority on hate groups.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:30 AM
1

Can't come up with a reasonable argument, so you rely on an ad-hominem. Nice.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 03:02 AM
1

But we do, it's not exactly hard to go to either of those places.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 02:16 AM
1

Because they hand out the pill for free at sports bars and locker rooms?
/r/MensRights12/03/12 02:12 AM
1

You can get free condoms at health clinics and planned parenthood centers.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 01:47 AM
2

Are you actually defending Rush Limbaugh? That's pretty ugly.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 11:18 PM
2

[citation needed]
/r/MensRights11/03/12 02:49 AM
0

I'm not saying that it is a serious argument, but merely that there are factors outside of what people choose to do.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 10:08 PM
0

But you're ignoring the fact that women attempt suicide far more frequently then men, and still lack agency in the sense that the "power elite" is almost entirely male. I have seen often in this subreddit that any disparity in power and income in the business world due to gender is because women are not as aggressive and ambitious, not because of ingrained sexism. Thus it is women's "fault" that they are not as powerful as they could be. Lets extend the same argument to the prison situation for …
/r/MensRights10/03/12 09:46 PM
3

Why are you defending the idea that these issues turn men into "non-participants" in society by arguing that I'm not using language that is hyperbolic enough for your tastes?
/r/MensRights10/03/12 09:38 PM
2

Like I said, there are some issues, but men are by no means a non-participant.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 09:28 PM
0

So instead of making a good argument, you're downvoting and changing the subject. Smart, you probably couldn't have actually disputed my claim with good information anyways.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 08:14 PM
2

Your statement does not logically follow from the assertions I made.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 08:10 PM
2

Relegated to a position of non-participant? Seriously? Like there are some actual issues with how the law treats men, but men are still the majority of power players in our society, by a wide margin. 95%+ of upper management positions in the top 500 corporations in America are men, and 80%+ of congresspeople are men. By resorting to such hyperbolic statements you're making the MRM look stupid.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 07:58 PM
1

Regardless of the reasons behind the fact, the fact that so few women have positions of power in corporate America is pure male privilege.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 07:36 PM
0

Among the 500 largest U.S. corporations, only 3-5% of the senior management are women. Of course, the fact that you use the article "a" with the word privilege means you don't really quite understand the idea of privilege in the sociological sense.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 01:06 AM
2

The bold text makes you much more authoritative.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 12:02 AM
1

You are mistaking a loss of privilege for oppression.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 10:55 PM
9

"Men" are not some massive homogeneous entity. Diversity is strength from a natural-selection point of view. How much of what we perceive as gender comes from "nature" versus "nurture" is still largely uncertain, but there should be room for all kinds of men in this world. If you claim to be for men's rights, you cannot claim that it should be rights for men to only behave in a way that you approve of.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 05:37 PM
16

Mangina is an extremely offensive word that equates femininity with negative connotations. A man should be as free to be stereotypically feminine as he is free to be stereotypically masculine.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 05:27 PM
-1

Just wondering if I'm banned from this subreddit yet. If this post is successful, could a friendly neighborhood mod please ban me?
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:54 AM
-1

Are you conveniently ignoring the MR posters in this very thread who are against female conscription on the grounds that women are less capable of being good combat officers than men? What about high-ranking officers in the military who still oppose women in combat?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:19 PM
0

No.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 09:57 PM
5

The reason why it's a "barrage on your senses" is because you can see the truth in it, but don't want to admit it, so your brain shuts off.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 11:22 PM
0

And of course my point is that we can make baseless assertions all day long if we simply quote "facts" without any statistics to back them up.
/r/MensRights22/01/11 01:40 AM
3

Do you factor in all the women who don't report being abused?
/r/MensRights22/01/11 12:47 AM
0

According to both my post, and the data I linked supporting my post, men are victims of domestic violence, but not nearly at the same rate women are.
/r/MensRights21/01/11 06:52 PM
-2

Data from the National Center for Victims of Crime While it's definitely not entirely a one-way street, women are still, by a huge margin, primarily the victims of domestic violence. Stating that this lack of funding for socially important services is somehow restoring rights to men is absurd.
/r/MensRights21/01/11 05:20 PM
12

I just felt it was good to expand on your message because, unfortunately, this is one of the subreddits where simple disagreement, even if it is well-reasoned, often gets downvoted viciously.
/r/MensRights10/12/10 06:25 PM
13

So my girlfriend, who works in a domestic violence shelter, and is a self-labeled feminist, doesn't recognize that men can be victims as well? That's funny, because usually she reminds me that men are often victims too when the topic of domestic violence comes up.
/r/MensRights10/12/10 06:21 PM
20

In fact, it should be okay for a woman to speak up here and say "I'm female, and I don't think this way, and here's why."
/r/MensRights10/12/10 06:18 PM
7

But when you bring up something as out-of-the ordinary as physical violence between the two of you, it's going to make her think that it is a possibility.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 12:00 AM
6

Has she threatened you with physical violence, or been physically violent towards you in a manner that could cause bodily harm? If not, then telling her that you would "knock her the fuck out" is pretty fucked up. If she has, why is she still your girlfriend?
/r/MensRights09/10/10 11:25 PM
0

There's gross under-reporting of all domestic violence.
/r/MensRights06/07/10 10:03 PM
-3

Any time an article mentions an "epidemic" but especially a "hidden epidemic" you need to take notice, because it means that this article is likely BS. Do women commit violence against men? Why, yes they do, our whole species has a great history of committing violence upon itself, and this history has not solely been of men committing violence upon women. Among other statistics on the American Bar Association's website, 20% of non-fatal violent crimes against women were committed by domestic par…
/r/MensRights05/07/10 05:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter