TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MetaphysicalDominant Archive

View 0 posts and 76 comments by MetaphysicalDominant on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Why primarily? Your happiness? Have children?
/r/seduction31/07/26 10:54 PM
1

How you don’t fumble depends on what your dating goals are and why.
/r/seduction31/07/26 10:49 PM
7

How’s your life going? It can’t be going great if you’re trying to convince yourself that the world would be better off without you. Your view is sexist nonsense. Women aren’t inherently superior to men, not in capacity nor morally. I guess the first issue is that you’re imagining that you can wave a magical wand and both create a whole new species and stop new men from being born. In reality, the only way to achieve anything close to what your view if for a group of people to form a totalitaria…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 06:58 PM
1

If she’s prostituting out of desperation, then her choice is better for herself than a slut’s. If she’s prostituting out of a desire to sell sex, then her choice is worse for herself than a slut’s.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 07:01 AM
1

Depends on the prostitute, whether she’s doing it out of desperation or a desire to sell sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 06:45 AM
2

That’s not real submission. And I would bet most of the frustrated boys don’t have enough money to easily pay.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 02:37 AM
27

The same way you’d seduce any woman?
/r/seduction10/09/25 06:08 AM
28

It is a little suspicious. Why not ask her and see what she says?
/r/MensRights05/09/25 09:34 PM
2

I don’t know why you’re being hostile while ignoring most of my points. And I don’t support a paper abortion exactly and don’t literally all the views of the people who support it. Also, I’m not sure it is correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 07:41 AM
4

The fact of the matter is that most men and women do not support a paper abortion for men, so it’s unreasonable to expect them to empathize with the very few men who want one and can’t get one. Now, you could say it’s unreasonable for them to not support a paper abortion, ok, but overturning Roe v Wade wouldn’t make them change their mind. Also, I’m fairly sure the right to abort must exist prior to a paper abortion. The only thing that would make it ok for a man to refuse to pay child support w…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 01:34 AM
0

If it’s like a tennis match, then men have two balls, women don’t have any, sometimes she misses and it’s just easier for you to hit another ball than for her to go pick up the ball she missed.
/r/seduction26/08/25 06:49 PM
0

The existence of true free will is heavily debatable but, even if we assume people have it, Do you think you have free will or not? it's one hell of an assumption to say it counters the difference in average reproductive preferences that come down through evolutionary biology. Sure, if you assume that mistaken conclusions from a mistaken view of man are true, then it would be a big assumption to say that free will counters what you’re assuming is true. On the topic of SMV, it's therefore relevan…
/r/MensRights25/08/25 11:15 PM
1

There is no greater proof against male superiority than its need to constantly assert itself. That’s not it works, not all men are reasonable. If the majority men were genuinely superior than women as a whole then it would be self evident - there would be no reason to convince others of the fact. That’s also not how it works. Not all men are reasonable and it’s not self-evident. You see it a lot: men's influencers online "debunking" claims from women that men are trash or men are cruel or men ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 09:14 PM
0

Reproduction strategy is literal evolutionary biology so it's just simple reality. Yeah, that completely ignores the biological reality of free will and its role in survival, attraction and having kids. It’s just not accurate when it comes to humans. It applies to some people depending on their choices, but not all. SMV is a crude term, I agree - but it's usually an accurate one, are you actually gonna give me the hippie argument that nobody cares about either the looks, money or status of their…
/r/MensRights25/08/25 05:09 PM
2

Marriage is directly beneficial for myself. It’s beneficial for my life, for my relationship with the woman I love, for my happiness etc. And SMV? Why would you rate yourself according to how others value you? And why would you rate women according to how others value them? And why would you want a woman who does that? And reproduction strategy? No offense, but that’s a soulless, deterministic way to describe love and sex. I have sex for myself, not for reproduction.
/r/MensRights25/08/25 01:49 AM
1

You bring up his inability to find a date with a woman (presumably a decent woman) willing to split the bill as if he wouldn’t have a harder time finding a decent woman who would have sex with him before knowing him.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 05:58 AM
1

How many women are going to be cool with a guy that height and having sex before getting to know him?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 05:52 AM
0

Is her question appropriate? If it is, then be honest. If not, then say it’s inappropriate. Or ask her why she’s asking.
/r/seduction10/08/25 04:45 PM
9

Lmao. I responded to each of your points one by one and you summarized it by quoting one unimportant point of mine. Get real bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 09:40 PM
6

I would personally rather get a no within 24hrs, than a no with 2 weeks worth of time and emotional investment down the drain, then have to pay for the meal of a girl who is never gonna speak to me again. If splitting the bill is so important to you, then state that up front. And don’t spend two weeks of time before going out on a date with her before asking her. Think of it this way, this woman has gone on 9 other dates all with men who just paid without asking questions. Maybe, maybe not. What…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 09:36 PM
8

Putting himself in an awkward position and potentially ruining his chances with a girl he wants to be with bc she won’t be forthcoming about whether she is willing to contribute or not. A men is 1000% more likely to ruin his chance with a girl by asking her to have sex before even knowing her or going out on a date. If splitting the bill is important to you, then why in the world are you so afraid of rejection to ask? Just ask. If she rejects you then she ain’t worth it. Move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 09:24 PM
20

I doubt you ever pretended it wasn’t obvious to you. If you’re looking for a serious relationship with a great woman, you shouldn’t be wanting sex with a woman before you get to know her or take her on a date. And if you’re so incompetent at dating that you can’t go on a date with a woman with little to no risk of being exploited, then you probably shouldn’t be dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 09:02 PM

How likely are you to think sexual thoughts about her? It depends on how busy I am. If I’m bored out of my mind, then possibly. But when I do it’s not about her per se but a woman who just looks like her since I’d have to imagine how she acts (which I obviously can’t get right). Do you ever imagine doing sexual things with her, and do you get an erection? Yes. It happens rarely. Does the likelihood of being aroused depend on what clothes a woman is wearing? To some extent, but it’s more a matter…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 11:09 PM
1

It’s not that important, but the possibility isn’t worth losing to become gay (though technology will change that in the future I imagine). But you get to see you and your beloved combined into one.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 04:49 AM
0

You mean they combined the two sperm together in an egg?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 04:43 AM
10

No. No possibility of biological children and less genital compatibility. Gay men are still men. Masculine communication is direct, linear, and straightforward. All relationship conflicts can be resolved with ease and minimal emotional baggage. Yeah, I sincerely doubt this is the case, particularly the latter part. Men have higher sex drives. Both partners will have roughly equal strength in libido. No dead bedrooms. Seriously doubt that being gay means a significantly smaller risk of a dead bed…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 04:17 AM

Nah, I think all women in should have to do paternity tests when in a marriage and all men should have to wear a chastity cage where the woman has the key. Best way to ensure there’s no cheating. If men are defensive, then run for the hills.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 09:56 AM
4

Wait, I don't need to meet your standard of evidence because you're here to change MY view. It’s not “my” standard of evidence, it’s a relatively objective standard of evidence. The fact that the overwhelming majority of men who answered your question said yes doesn’t mean that men are more willing than woman. I’m trying to change your view by pointing out that you have no real basis for your view. There are two ways you could know men are more willing. You could present a causal explanation bas…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/23 05:45 AM
19

Where’s your evidence that men are more willing to please their partner than women? Putting aside that a survey on this forum is no where near sufficient evidence, where’s your survey where you ask women? Don’t forget to take into consideration the number of men vs. women on Reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/23 05:17 AM
5

I think dont cum from sex because they dont like it. They like what they can gain from sex. That is why women dont give it up for free and if they do they are shamed by other women. Women dont want men to have it too easy. I don’t know what sort of women you’re learning from, but I’d recommend doing some research. Do a google search. I’m sure you can find some women who are like that, particularly if they view sex for pleasure as immoral, but that doesn’t apply to moral ie selfish women. Women m…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/23 03:45 AM
5

I mean, for one there could be rape or assault before you agree to sex. Two, the guy could say or do something during sex that would make her want to stop that isn’t directly assault, so she tells him to stop really clearly and he doesn’t. Three, the guy could also anally rape her suddenly, like just pull out of the vagina and stick it in her ass. Or the guy could assault her during sex, then she tries to stop the sex and then he forcefully continues. Your 3 inch boyfriend example is completely …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/23 03:17 AM
3

That’s not the only risk though. There’s rape, assault, the risk of an incompetent lover. Men have more control in sex than women. A woman’s pleasure in sex is much more dependent on his actions than vice versa, so men can more easily be bad lovers in casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/23 02:44 AM

In the modern world, corporate or business success is often held as the pinnacle of achievement. By who? Where is the art that portrays CEOs as heroes? Who believes that CEOs are heroes for being CEOs? Who holds them up as some of the most moral men? I do, at least for their productive work putting aside their life outside of that, but I don’t think that’s a common view. However, as monumental as business success might be, it often pales in comparison to the more intimate joys of life – particul…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 01:18 AM
1

Impossible scenarios are never ideal. Men and women should pursue the goals/values necessary for them to live. They should pursue sex with those who share their highest goals/values. They don’t out of ignorance or evasion.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 08:37 PM
3

No. The fact that some women dupe some men doesn’t justify forcing an innocent man who doesn’t want a paternity test to get one. If a man discovers he’s not the biological father, then he shouldn’t have any legal responsibilities though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 03:33 PM
0

Why would the biological father be responsible for the child suffering if a woman chose to have it and can’t take care of it as single mother? The children this would effect were those of women unwilling to have an abortion having sex with men unwilling to pay child support. That’s on the woman for choosing to have the child instead of having an abortion, not the fault of the man. The fact that some women will make bad choices about becoming a single mother doesn’t justify forcing a man to pay c…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 03:12 PM
1

Nope. If a woman chooses to be a mother, that doesn’t mean a man has to be a father. Even though the law wrongly doesn’t allow men to opt out of child support before the child is born, a man still doesn’t have to spend time with or raise the child. He can give up all parental rights and responsibilities, except child support unfortunately. Impregnating a woman and her giving birth to the child doesn’t make a man a parent. For some women, the best thing for their life is not to be a single mother…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 05:32 AM
-1

Yeah. Just like a woman having sex and becoming pregnant doesn’t mean she’s choosing to be a mother, a man having sex and impregnating a woman doesn’t mean he’s choosing to be a father. Men should have to opt in before the child is born to gain parental rights and responsibilities, including legal financial responsibilities. After that, it’s up to the mother if she wants to grant him those.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 05:26 AM
2

The only way to help man learn as quickly as possible what’s true and necessary for his life and happiness, ie moral, is to teach and promote it. Yeah, it needs to promoted in the right way, but compromising doesn’t help.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 09:09 PM
8

It’s the lack of a positive conception of being a man, but success with regards to romance means you’ve found and developed a relationship with a woman who shares your highest values, not having sex or relationships with high numbers of beautiful women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 07:58 PM
1

Let's just put aside the chemicals that are released in your body during sex for a second and just look at it objectively. You can’t look at sex objectively while putting aside a key aspect of sex in reality. Without the euphoria that you're biologically programmed to feel during sex, you probably would have no interest in it. Well, putting aside that much of the pleasure during sex is dependent on what sort of woman I’m having sex with, yeah that’s true. Sex would literally be like hooking up w…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 08:06 PM
1

He’s missing out on better sex and romance just like he’d be missing out on friendship if he paid someone to be his friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 11:29 PM
1

I see, well then update your post so it reflects your view.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/22 10:56 PM
5

As someone who is starved of sex, that’s simply not true. I don’t equate having sex with self-worth even though I think being selfish is moral and pursuing sex for myself in an exclusive relationship is moral. And there are men who have lots of casual sex that try to use their conquests to cover their low self-esteem.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/22 10:52 PM
1

Nah, there’s a big difference between chasing validation for the sake of the validation or making you feel better, and “chasing validation” as a less important value for a more important goal and not as a primary source of self esteem. Labeling all of that as “chasing validation” is superficial, and mistaken ultimately.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 03:06 AM
1

Well, it depends on what sort of validation you’re pursuing. You can pursue recognition for something you’ve reasoned is good for yourself by someone who reasoned that it was good and from someone who you’ve reasoned is good for yourself. Or you can pursue validation from others simply because it’s from others, to make up for your lack of self-esteem.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 02:52 AM
1

Well, if you’re ultimately doing it for yourself or if your standard is what’s best for yourself, then I don’t see how.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 01:52 AM
1

You can wear make up for yourself in the sense that you think it makes you look better and you value looking better for people who you think are better for you. u/CimZim
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 01:48 AM
4

Without commenting on what a lot of my sex finds hot, I don’t like big breasts. I don’t like tattoos, neither on men nor women even though I’m straight. I don’t like butts that are too big. I don’t like beards, though some men look better with facial hair depending on their bone structure. I don’t like big, body building muscles on guys even if they are natural. I don’t like women who are too much shorter than me, though I do like them shorter. I don’t like the look of fake tits generally, thoug…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 01:41 AM
2

In most circumstances he’s deluding himself that the effort isn’t worth the rewards of a romantic relationship. He could be mistaken by thinking the costs to him will be higher than they can be or mistaken by thinking the rewards will be how lower than they can be. He won’t necessarily have a serious life crisis, but I don’t see how he’ll be able to have self-esteem. If you have self-esteem, then you’d think that there would be some woman who would esteem you enough to enter a romantic relations…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 04:52 PM
37

It could only be one of three things. They want to harvest your heart and sell it on the black market. They are a part of the Illuminati. They are using their x ray vision to see if your heart is beating faster, indicating you are lying.
/r/seduction25/09/22 08:10 AM
1

Do you like anything about her besides that she’s beautiful?
/r/seduction09/02/22 06:06 AM
2

I wouldn’t call that logically convincing someone. That’s more like trying to buy their affections with the wrong currency, the examples you mentioned, which is illogical.
/r/seduction20/11/21 01:01 AM
1

Buy me a coffee, DM me and we can talk. https://buymeacoffee.com/MetaphysicalD
/r/seduction23/05/21 12:34 AM
2

Ok whatever dude, pick a bad, unreasonable way for yourself to find a date and improve your social skills. If you want a better method for finding a date improving your social skills, better methods for you exist.
/r/seduction22/05/21 11:16 PM
1

It’s insane mode difficulty for trying to learn social skills and find a woman worth dating.
/r/seduction22/05/21 11:10 PM
2

Ok but what if my social skills suck and I want to improve them. Approaching that one cute girl at the gym wont help. That won’t help you improve them, you’re completely right. Try and learn to make friends, with men and women, in situations where it’s easier for strangers to get to know one another, not in insane mode at the mall.
/r/seduction22/05/21 11:06 PM
2

It’s interesting that you don’t see the issue when your OP was complaining about your current method. That’s the problem. It’s not a good method for finding a date. I literally dont understand the point of this. I'm going to the mall day after day approaching 5 to 10 women a day and getting literally nowhere. What is supposed to he happening? My social skills arent improving. It's either a hard "NO" or a variation of no such as "I have a bf" I cant even get to the point of conversation. Its ment…
/r/seduction22/05/21 10:41 PM
3

You asked me what I say to those guys and I told you. You’re missing my point. My point isn’t that you’re better off never approaching women who you find attractive enough to bother trying to date. My point was that you’d be better off doing that as you live your life, as part of what you’re doing to pursue your own happiness, as a something you do for fun on the side while you engage in a better method of finding a date. It’s not that all you’re doing is going up to women who you find attractiv…
/r/seduction22/05/21 10:37 PM
2

So what? That doesn’t mean that’s the best method for them to find someone to date. And that doesn’t meant that was the best method for them to learn in the first place. And that doesn’t mean that it will work for you or is best for you. And that’s without even going for defining what success is and should be for men in general and for you in particular.
/r/seduction22/05/21 10:25 PM
5

There’s nothing I said that even implied that. I’m not sure why you’d want to bother going out of your way to let her know you find her attractive. I think that’s too much of a waste of your time. There’s nothing wrong with approaching a really attractive woman randomly if you want to try getting to know her and to introduce yourself to see if she’s worth dating. But that’s something you do for fun while using a better method for finding a date. It’s like buying a lotto ticket while pursuing you…
/r/seduction22/05/21 10:18 PM
2

You should be getting tired of it. You’d be better off meeting women while you are doing the things you like to do who are also doing the things you like to do. That way you at least know the woman you’re attracted to has some common ground. Like at a place singles meet at like a bar, while doing your hobbies, through your job, on a dating app, through your friends etc. Look, I’m not surprised that you don’t understand the point of what you’re doing and that you’re getting tired of it. I could u…
/r/seduction22/05/21 10:09 PM
4

That sounds like an insane, low self-esteem idea if you’re looking for a woman good for you to date. It’s good that you have the courage to do that and that will be of help to you, but you’d be better off for finding a woman to date by picking more selectively.
/r/seduction22/05/21 09:38 PM
1

Well that sounds like a good dating goal to have, to figure out what the options are and which option fits best into your overall life goals, including making a new option. And if you don’t know what you want out of life, then figuring out what the options are and what’s best for you is a good life goal to have. If you don’t know what you want and you think you’ll have a good time with her, then it’s probably a good idea to go on a date.
/r/seduction16/05/21 06:38 PM
1

What do you want out of dating? Why are you dating? Like if you’re just looking for hookups, then what you should do is different than if you’re looking for a serious romance.
/r/seduction16/05/21 06:15 PM
3

What are your dating goals?
/r/seduction16/05/21 06:06 PM
6

Good point. I do think most men who say they want a wholesome girl mean they want a wholesome girl they find sexually attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 01:10 AM
2

Ah. Oops.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 01:09 AM
4

Nice try at manipulation.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 03:52 PM
1

By their biology, men are dominant in being able to achieve their own pleasure during sexual intercourse (orgasm during sex much easier, sex ends after the man orgasms, men are physically more capable so it’s easier to take physical control and more active role), so masculine fashion is fashion that emphasizes self-control and capability of controlling/leading over emphasizing beauty. Feminine fashion would emphasize beauty. Masculine and feminine fashion properly serve as foils to one another. …
/r/seduction19/09/20 11:02 AM
1

What are all of those more abstract terms in your title to you exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 12:17 AM
3

If you act a certain way, you can only possibly attract women who are attracted to that. You act cold, so you attract women who like that. Figure out how what’s the best way for you choose and act in a relationship, and then pursue women while doing that.
/r/seduction20/08/20 11:31 PM
13

Your lack of interest in a LTR is not caused by how attractive you actually are or how attractive you perceive yourself to be or how attractive others perceive you to be. Edit: It’s caused by how valuable/good you believe a LTR is. Edit: Though presumably it’s easier for people who are attractive by the cultural norms, if that doesn’t include pursuing a LTR, to pursue hookups.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/20 02:02 AM
1

The problem is that there’s no common objective morality, religion isn’t an answer, no common objective view of what’s moral sexually and no common objective view of masculinity and femininity. Everyone has an opinion, some feel they are right, but they have no way to persuade others because they don’t actually know that they are right. And a good part are explicitly against objectivity in morality and words in general, so they are trying not to be reasonable.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/20 10:12 AM
1

No. It’s a tool that can be used differently and thought about differently based on your choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/20 09:45 AM
1

99.9% of people believe that it’s moral to initiate force against others sometimes. People can believe all sorts of things are moral and immoral. Morality deals with choices. Sex is a really important part of living and you can choose whether to have it or not, so probably all moralities have something to say about it. So some moralities say that it’s moral to force others based on their sexual choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/20 09:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter