TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MethodiusIV Archive

View 0 posts and 89 comments by MethodiusIV on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Women would experience a net benefit if they typically deferred to men in matters of decision-making because their thoughts are usually clouded by emotions and poor judgment. As things stand, women are often left with sole responsibility for making decisions without receiving male output which is okay but things could be better. If you want the optimal outcome, then decisions should be left to the best decision makers.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 07:56 PM
1

Men are better than women in some ways. If yes, then why do you think that? Because it's observable and demonstrable. How much better are men compared to women? Not much better. People can be pretty shitty and mediocre in general. Is it possible for women to ever be equal to men? Not on a criteria-by-criteria basis but in the spirit of the question it's possible for a woman to be equal and even better than most men as a person if she wants to be (the last part is the crucial piece). It's not lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 11:30 PM
2

Higher status men and women (i.e. more popular, better looking, better paying jobs) are more likely to be conformists. To get high status you have be always concerned about what people think of you and trying to meet their expectations. Look at corporations for instance where being a follower is encouraged. Low status men and women stay low status in the first place because they are more individual in their thinking and behavior and they're less susceptible to outside manipulation. People don't …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 11:03 PM
0

They can change behaviorally but inside the head the wiring is the same. If a beta is happy enough with that then he becomes beta bucks and it's his problem now. Some men are happy to be beta bucks. He better hope that she doesn't go back to her old self or there goes the life that he wanted.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 10:44 PM
1

All I know is that women have the maturity of teenagers and that supposedly women's brains stop developing sooner than men's brains. If women didn't act like teenagers in the first place then I wouldn't attribute much to that. I'd probably never even stop to ask the question. Teenagers are certainly capable in their own ways and maybe better at some tasks than adults. I'd never put a teenager in charge or depend on them heavily for my livelihood, especially if there was a rational adult around.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 10:32 PM
2

There's no 100 percent checklist that I resort to when deciding if a girl is promiscuous or not. All I say is that I know a slut when I see one.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 10:09 PM
-2

Blue pillers are a lot like animals. Both react mostly on instinct instead of reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 09:58 PM
5

Nothing too surprising there. Women are better at following instructions and are distrustful of other women. Men find drama to be mental agony and are thus more vulnerable against psychological warfare. The women probably actually enjoy getting screamed at and mentally abused a little by drill sergeant. One of the things the TRP gets right is the correct way to break down a woman is to ignore her and treat her like she doesn't exist. Yelling and calling a woman names only gives her the attention…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/15 07:07 PM
4

Feminists perpetuate a myth that nearly all rapists get away with their crime. They also intentionally perpetuate an image of police investigation that is hostile to rape victims. The truth is that, while rape is a hard crime to prove, a solid percentage of rapists probably are convicted and sent to prison. Also, police investigations are probably more tedious than hostile and women who are left traumatized by things like that are probably too sensitive to begin with. Many cases that feminists w…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 07:59 PM
1

Outside of places like Congo, rape rarely happens. Like with all crimes though, some people are less likely to be victims than others. Women who live in bad neighborhoods or are reckless in their behavior and whom they associate with are more likely to be raped than others. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that bad things might happen if pass out somewhere or if you're alone with someone or a group of people you don't know.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 06:43 PM
2

You did a good job of explaining what a "nice girl" is. A "nice girl" is a girl who kind, affable, understanding, usually seems nonslutty (although it's not a requirement), probably grew up in a good family and therefore didn't acquire many outwardly bad traits. This the type of woman you'd want to marry, assuming she's nonslutty and you were interested in getting married. Some women seem to think that simply not sleeping with a lot of men makes them "nice girls", meanwhile they could have an ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 06:22 PM
1

Honestly, I hold MGTOW in higher regard than The Red Pill (not the subreddit but in general). TRPers strike me as contradictory and don't seem particularly intelligent to me as a result. I find the subreddit interesting but I know those aren't the first people I'd go to for advice on how to live my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 05:52 PM
6

Yes you did. You should be proud of yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 05:22 AM
6

May I ask why you didn't apologize on the same day?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 04:26 AM
1

Because I already know women as a group are untrustworthy so I protect myself once AWALT behavior shows itself, but I give them a chance to prove that they're individually not like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 01:09 AM
6

It's not. As a man, that's why it's so bizarre. If a woman feels that anything reflects her in a negative light, even in the remotest sense, then she will deny it. Also, women's words are always crafted to portray them in the most flattering way possible omitting details or lying if it benefits them at that given moment. It's why I never take anything a woman says as the truth unless there is someone else who can corroborate her story.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 01:05 AM
10

When people say that women don't accept responsibility, they're talking about when women never accept accountability for their actions. Everything is always someone else's fault, the event in question never happened (gaslighting), or they try to deflect attention away from their actions by bringing up irrelevant BS. A woman will always openly deny any wrongdoing, although I think sometimes they know inside that they're full of shit and that knowledge torments them psychologically. You'll never h…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 12:42 AM
3

If there is an institution that is training young girls to avoid responsibility of their actions then point it out, otherwise it's incomprehensible that a trait could be shared so universally by women unless it was innate in their being.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/15 03:56 AM
0

In some contexts I respect women. In some contexts I don't respect men. I give men a greater benefit of the doubt because they are men and men have proven more to me than women, but respect is earned not given. If a man shows he's not deserving of respect, then I don't give it to him. Same with a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/15 03:41 AM
1

Very good. That's what I was looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/15 03:29 AM
1

It is based on scientific evidence: http://www.education.com/reference/article/Ref_Boys_Girls/ Schopenhauer realized this through insight even before there was scientific evidence though. He even got the ages approximately right which is incredible unless he read it in a book.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/15 11:38 AM
0

Ah, I'm done explaining things. Figure it out yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/15 01:30 AM
-1

I will do nothing of the sort. Have a good day and try not to cry in the lab.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/15 01:11 AM
0

Maturity is associated with experience and intellect. You had stated that intellect had nothing to do with maturity which is dead wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/15 01:10 AM
1

Woman, I've stated time and time again that men gain the trait of mental superiority over women as they mature and that women only change superficially after adolescence but you keep asking the same questions.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/15 12:52 AM
1

Compare an adult woman to a teenage girl and an adult man to a teenage boy, a teenage girl, or an adult woman. The woman and the teenage girl will be the same while the adult man is mentally superior to all three.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/15 12:37 AM
2

Maturity is associated with a greater understanding of the world. A person's understanding of the world is greatly associated with that person's intellect.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/15 12:28 AM
1

When it comes to women, any change that takes place after late adolescence is superficial. That's why they're referred to as "the most responsible teenager in the house".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/15 12:23 AM
0

The male brain takes about a full decade longer than the female brain to completely develop. The male brain doesn't stop developing until its early 30s, the female brain stops developing in its early 20s.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 11:07 PM
1

Women adopt different personas, take up different activities but their mind itself doesn't change much. The women's mental state is the same as it was when she was in her teens. Men actually get a lot smarter than they were in their teens to the point where they may even have trouble relating to their younger selves. Their brain changes and it's like they become a entirely different person. It's literally the difference between an adult and a child. For men, it's not a superficial change. To und…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 10:52 PM
0

It doesn't take a man until 28 to catch up to a woman. He's caught up to or even slightly surpassed women by the time he's around 18. By the time he's 28, he's far ahead of women his own age and much older than him. I don't think you're a liar. I think you're delusional or unaware of how much more mature an adult male is than a teenage male. Mentally the adult male is far superior to the teenage male. The adult male can intellectually run circles around the teenage male because he's so much smar…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 10:34 PM
1

People don't like being told what to do and want freedom to do whatever they want. Women are no different and when given more freedom will happily take it. What women don't like are consequences. You can have more freedom but like with all things there are consequences with that freedom. Women don't like being told they're a bad woman and that a good man won't take them so they blame men for not wanting their worthless selves.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 03:04 AM
1

I think some of it is attention-seeking because feminism is about money and feminists get less money if they become irrelevant. I think some of the hardcore feminists who complain street harassment are just paranoid, mentally-damaged women. Maybe they were sexually abused as a child and now they hate men who simply compliment them. I do feel bad for them slightly.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 02:56 AM
1

I think it's a good idea but I doubt feminists will be happy with this much when women change their minds and decide that rape happened but the guy is not charged because they signed a contract. They don't want justice, they just want to make it easier to charge men with rape even if he's innocent.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 02:48 AM
1

I don't think most women want to ride the cock carousel. Women are better off being loved and taken care of but the allure of alpha cock too strong. Many women are left scarred by the cock carousel but they can't avoid it because they're illogical, controlled by their emotions.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 02:28 AM
8

I don't have any clue. I only find maybe 5-10% of the women I see genuinely attractive, but the percentage I'd sleep with probably much higher than that. Maybe with women the reverse is true. They find more men attractive but the percentage they'll sleep with is smaller.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 02:17 AM
1

Most people read this and they're automatically going to disagree. I agree with this statement, on the other hand. I believe that there are Red Pillers who hold the view that women are as intelligent, logical, and rational men and that the problem is that women are conditioned by society and need to be held accountable. I don't believe that all Red Pillers hold this view, however, and that there are those whose views align with my own. My personal view is that women are not as intelligent, logic…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/15 07:04 PM
3

Desperate men marry sluts. A man with options doesn't marry a slut unless he's an idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/15 06:52 PM
3

Most men don't slut shame women, they simply keep their internal disgust for promiscuous women to themselves. If you don't ask, they don't tell. If you see a guy slut shaming a woman in real life, that guy's probably an asshole. Most men won't go out their way to make a woman feel bad which is why you get 30 year old women with massive n-counts saying I wish I had known men didn't like sluts when I was younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/15 05:56 PM
0

Women and men are largely controlled for the good of the society. No one within a society lives with absolute freedom. The real question is should we adopt a reactionary position and have women revert back to earlier societal roles. I think that's a bad idea because we need to be future-oriented and address issues as they arise. Thinking that going back to the way that things were before will solve all our problems is fallacious thinking because things change and there was a reason that people m…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/15 05:44 PM
7

Yup. Women would never admit to it. Every girl in her mind wants a "nice guy" who "treats her right".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 11:50 PM
8

For the record, most of the guys women call douchebags aren't actual douchebags. Usually the woman is just mad because the guy challenges her and doesn't give her every single thing she wants. She calls him a douchebag because she's childish and solipsistic. However some guys fool themselves by buying into the idea that they can still be a nice guy and still attract women with the same success if they act confident and they're physically attractive. Kindness is a turn-off for women so by trying …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 11:43 PM
1

The threshold at which I'd consider that a guy is overstepping his boundaries is actually pretty low. I'd probably consider any pushy or aggressive behavior toward a female stranger on the street as overstepping his boundaries even though she'd probably be more receptive to that than a more passive approach. I don't really see much street harassment to begin with though so I don't believe that guys frequently overstepping their boundaries is actually a genuine problem. If I saw that it was a rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 11:18 AM
4

I honestly don't think childhood education really plays a big role in it and that the brainwashing aspect is exaggerated by TRPers. I think some guys are just predisposed to the "beta bucks" role. I can't really pinpoint why although it might be biological in origin. It makes sense that a society would consist of a certain percentage of beta providers.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 11:01 AM
2

I think the order of attraction for women actually goes Status -> Behavior -> Looks. So that would mean according to me that women are attracted to status primarily, then behavior, then looks. Behavior is important, especially for not getting taken advantage of once a woman is already attracted to you, but status trumps everything. If so, does this mean that the attractiveness for girls is relatively set in stone, where as attractiveness for men is more fluid and can be developed? No, obviously …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 08:53 PM
2

But the point wasn't that the females weren't hunters in other species, right? You're not addressing the meaning behind that statement or you've completely failed to understand the meaning. I'd argue that females lions are more cooperative than males lions, but that doesn't mean anything regarding human beings. In humans, the men are more cooperative than the women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 01:19 AM
1

Many female animals in the wild raise their offspring by themselves. Raising offspring is mostly a matter of feeding and keeping the children away from danger. It's not something that requires a massive group effort. Comparatively, there are less species that hunt alone. Those that hunt alone are born with special weapons that humans don't naturally possess. These animals focus primarily on smaller, weaker prey that don't pose much of a physical threat which also differs from humans since humans…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 12:49 AM
2

Childcare doesn't require that much cooperation.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 12:33 AM
2

I can only think of a few: raising small children, interpersonal manipulation, and learning foreign languages.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 12:31 AM
2

Well that's a poor counterexample because hunting objectively requires more cooperation than gathering.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 12:23 AM
3

You've never heard it stated in those exact words, but that's what's being said when people say men are more loyal, more honorable, more generous, etc. If you've heard the latter, then you've heard the former; it's simply that I've re-arranged the ideas in a way that may have more significance. In all things that require teamwork, those teams that consist of all men tend to work more like a well-oiled machine and those teams that consist of all women or a mixture of men and women don't work as e…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/15 11:39 PM
4

Women generally put their own interests first and foremost. You're also mistaken if you've interpreted my statement to mean that men work together at the exclusion of women. Men are more likely to view women as part of their team than the reverse, which is why a patriarchal system is very appropriate since men are very much more likely to look out for women than women are to look out for men. Part of TRP anger toward women is that men are more likely to view women as a partner but there is a sen…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/15 11:23 PM
3

But they do apply in teams, don't they? Therefore if men are better team players, it follows that these characteristics would likely apply to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/15 11:09 PM
3

Honor, loyalty, generosity, and kindness could all be categorized under team players. Natural selection may have favored greater teamwork in men because cooperation is necessary for important activities like hunting, construction, and delegation of social duties. Being able to work together and negotiate also helps prevent unnecessary tribal warfare, which men would have a great incentive to avoid since many would die or become crippled otherwise. I doubt you can honestly deny that men generally…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/15 11:02 PM
2

Do you agree with this definition of solipsism ? Yes, that definition of solipsism describes women. Also , what does the fact that women are flexible and emotional have to do with solipsism? Women being "flexible", although a horrible descriptor of women, is a offshoot of solipsism. Women are easily influenced by peer pressure or by their emotions at any time which is a consequence of their relative lack of objectivity. An example that is common is women asking others what they should think, rat…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/15 09:12 PM
1

Say you had a boyfriend and you were forced between two options. One option was that he would have sex with new women every week but he didn't spend any time going out with them, talking with them about their feelings, or doing any of things that make up creating an emotional connection. The other option is that he was sexually faithful to only you. However he was always hanging out with women, hugging them and being friendly, constantly talking with them about and their and his feelings, and ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/15 09:08 PM
4

Men and women are a bit different in that regard. Women tend to see emotional infidelity as being worse than physical infidelity, whereas men tend to see physical infidelity as being worse than emotional infidelity. I bet you'd also say that your boyfriend or husband having an emotional affair with another woman is worse than him having a sexual affair with another woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/15 08:52 PM
1

Nothing different besides sit when I use the toilet. I guess it all depends though. Would I just be a man who looks like an attractive woman for a week but still thinks like a man? Or would I be completely transformed....mind, body, and spirit and all that crap? If the latter then I'd probably do all the stupid shit women do on a weekly basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/15 08:46 PM
1

I used to think of women as equals, or at least I didn't actively look as them children. Eventually I realized that women weren't equal to me which led to a greater realization that they weren't equal to men in general. I realized that my entire approach to them had been wrong and that it was a mistake to view them as equals. "The most responsible teenager in the house" is a very apt way of describing women. I still get frustrated with them from time to time because of my expectations but I get …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/15 08:26 PM
1

I'm not implicating that people grow out of it when they get older, but a lot of RPers are stupid, immature teenagers and young men in their early 20s. I doubt the girl was trying to be nice to him to ease the blow of the rejection however. She's probably trying to avoid direct confrontation.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/15 07:55 PM
2

No, there isn't any real need to go beyond the status quo.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/15 07:47 PM
3

My dress was not so short that he could see my underwear easily so he must have been looking when he shouldn't have been. This is a good example of hamstering right here. Go out wearing a short dress such that anyone could catch a glimpse of underwear and if someone happens to catch a glimpse of your panties tell yourself that "he must have been looking when he shouldn't have been" because there's no way anyone could see your underwear when you're wearing a short dress that doesn't leave much to…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/15 09:16 PM
2

I don't think they ignore nice guys outright. Unless the girl is really stuck-up, they acknowledge them and give them attention, sometimes even leading them on for personal favors if the guy is stupid enough to let himself be put in that situation. They like 'bad boys' more and are more attracted to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/15 09:00 PM
3

Also I've never lived with him personally, but the guys in our group who have lived with him don't really respect him. When questioned about this, one guy told me that it's because he is extremely self-centered. Using Red Pill tactics on men is not generally a good idea. Concepts like integrity actually mean something and men don't appreciate other men trying to control them because they're not attracted to alpha behavior. Another thing is that his relationhips with his girlfriends don't seem he…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/15 08:42 PM
1

For the time being, drunk women are mostly held accountable for their actions and let's hope things stay that way. Nobody is forcing women to get drunk so they should be held accountable when they do drink.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/15 04:01 PM
1

The wall isn't a sudden thing where....BAM!....a woman goes from having all sorts of men wanting to be with her to having no suitors whatsoever. It's symbolic for the point in a woman's life where her actual sexual market value is significantly lower than her self-perceived sexual market value and marks the beginning of her descent into sexual irrelevancy. Most men want to fuck a 20 year old hottie, much fewer men look at a 35 year old the same way. Being that old automatically disqualifies a wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/15 03:12 PM
2

It'd be interesting if feminist theory adapted to facts and logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/15 03:01 PM
1

I won't reiterate the reasons why the statistic is absurd at face value since I see others commenters have already done that. Instead I'll turn focus toward the people who publish these statistics in the first place: feminists. Feminists have spent so much time tarnishing their reputation that it's only natural in this day and age that they'd have no credibility left. Feminists are like the boy who cried 'wolf'. I don't believe anything they say because they're liars as far as I'm concerned.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/15 08:11 PM
1

No, it's not hypocritical. It's called wanting to have your cake and eat it too. Why do some women want to be a part of something that is very traditional, when they don’t live up to the standards? They don't care about their prospective partner's standards. It's very likely that they won't care about anything their partner wants if they do end up getting married. It's all about them and it will always be all about them. Avoid sluts for marriage. Even worse, why do they feel entitled that a man …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/15 03:31 PM
1

Some of it is obvious, some of it isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/15 03:18 PM
10

Fuck around in your teens and 20s with attractive guys, then lasso in a beta servant for gifts and prizes when the wall is approaching and the attractive guys no longer want you. Nope, I don't call that sacrifice and I don't care about all the nonsense that comes out of women's mouths about maturity. That's called having your cake and eating it too. Maybe I'm severely underestimating how much a woman loathes being a relationship with a beta, but even then the woman doesn't have to be in a relati…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/15 02:08 PM
2

There are no statistics that I know of to back up your assertions. All statistics I have seen have implied exactly the opposite: that people who are less promiscuous come from better homes, are more stable, better decision makers, and less prone to criminal behaviors. Promiscuity is linked to other dysfunctional behaviors.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/15 12:11 AM
2

However, in that case the important feature is NOT virginity but intentionality, choice and restraint. 'Dysfunction' is a broad term, but a lack of intentionality, choice, and restraint would all fall under 'dysfunction'. Therefore, I would wager that say the choice is between an 18 year old virgin and a 25 year old with one relationship, the 25 year old would still be the better bet. Ah, but the 18 year old virgin is younger, less weathered by experience, and has more years before hitting the w…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/15 12:01 AM
5

Promiscuity is a symptom of dysfunction rather the cause of it. Therefore it makes sense that marriages to 25 year old virgins would be more stable than marriages to 18 year old virgins. The 18 year old virgin could still be dysfunctional but not have had a proper opportunity to act out on her dysfunction for numerous reasons: being an ugly duckling, highly protective parents, etc. The 25 year old virgin is a safer commodity because she's had a longer time to act out on any personal dysfunctions…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/15 09:46 PM
1

A person who is using drugs or alcohol is always capable of giving consent in my opinion. Being under the influence from drugs that a person willfully chooses to take shouldn't be a cop out for accepting responsibility for one's actions. Giving consent while under the influence is very different than being passed out and having someone take advantage of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/15 09:30 PM
2

I think the mind is a powerful thing and that it's sometimes capable of creating problems out of thin air. I'm open to the possibility that genetics or hormones may have a role in this mental illness of making someone believe he or she was born with the wrong body, but transwomen aren't women and transmen aren't men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/15 07:55 PM
22

That's a damn good argument. Transgendered people are psychologically ill though. They don't legitimize anything. A transgendered person believing that he or she is mentally of the opposite sex doesn't make it so. There are no trans men or trans women, just people who are psychologically ill.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/15 06:47 PM
2

Everyone is a victim of something at one time or another, but no she's not based on the assumed meaning in this case. Her claims of being raped are very doubtful. I believe though she may be a victim of her feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/15 06:36 PM
3

Of course. Companionship, social status, ego, the prospect of legitimate children are all reasons that it might be worth it for such a man to marry and therefore they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/15 06:54 PM
1

Women can be very snippy with people in general because they love talking and don't always filter what comes out of their mouths. If a woman is snippy with a man, most likely he'll just ignore it and it doesn't blow up. If a woman is snippy with another woman, however, chances are the other woman will retaliate by being snippy back creating massive drama over something stupid and then they'll keep badmouthing each other afterward. I've seen it happen countless times. Men are usually more conscio…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/15 04:49 PM
0

I wouldn't say that men generally skew idealistically; men do skew more idealistically. It's not an ubiquitous truth on a case-by-case basis, but men generally care more about the well-being of women than women care about the well-being of men. That could be said to be a type of "love" in itself; the ancient Greeks had multiple words for "love". Regarding the type of "love" we're talking about as pertains to relationships, it's ludicrous to think of that demonstrated by men or women to be anythi…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/15 03:45 PM
1

To a certain extent, it does violate the motivation principle. If the woman doesn't strongly push for commitment or exercise dread, the man may become content in the arrangement. It's still worthwhile for a woman to do housework because a woman needs to demonstrate her value. Also, a man's need for cleanliness is not exhausted by her performing household chores for him in the present, thus the possibility of future benefit is enticing to him and it can be taken away by the woman at a moment's no…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/15 06:40 AM
2

TRPillers believe that women are more self-centered than men and they get this part right mostly. How much weight should be distributed between female biology, upbringing, and the generous bounty of men that women are free to choose from is debatable. However, the premise itself is sound and well rooted in reality. Love, as it's meant in practice however, is a selfish concept motivated by greed and desire. Men may be more generous in relationships due to being relatively less self-centered, but …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/15 06:23 AM
34

I don't assume Red Pill men hate women. I can see clearly for myself that Red Pill men hate women based on the content that they write. The fault lies not with people for assuming, it lies with Red Pillers for assuming that people are assuming when the proof of their hate lies in plain sight for anyone to see. Some Red Pillers are in denial.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 02:11 PM
1

People are allowed to have whatever standards they want, including men. I can sympathize with women though. Due to the culture, a woman often needs to have sex just to get a foot in the door, much less have a long-term, committed relationship. If a woman is not sleeping with a man at some point, he'll assume she's not interested in him and look elsewhere. At the very least, he won't want to risk having a committed relationship with someone not interested in him. Having had several sexual partner…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 03:28 AM
0

Unless one believes that abortions are unethical - a view I agree with, but many don't - I don't see how anyone could come to the conclusion that he's doing something abhorrent. Since when has letting someone run a con game on you been seen as something honorable?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 03:17 AM
3

Yes, as far as the SMP is concerned. The obvious reason from a biological perspective is that a middle-aged, menopausal woman offers no reproductive value to man, whereas a middle-aged man still offers reproductive value and the ability to provide/protect. From a purely aesthetics perspective though, a middle-aged woman can still look nice if she doesn't let herself fall apart. There's no rule stating that an older woman has to look like an ogre, even if she's no longer sexually attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 02:40 AM
1

No, I don't think that woman are incapable of loyalty given the right circumstances. There are differences among women in their level of abstract thinking obviously, but I don't have a problem saying that women are usually less capable in that regard when compared to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 02:21 AM
0

I believe that women can be loyal in the right circumstances, even without a full comprehension of loyalty. Men are more predisposed to use logic and think in the abstract, which makes them more likely to adhere to ideals like loyalty. Women are more emotion-oriented, however, which naturally makes their loyalty of a more fickle nature. In conclusion, I think a man can be more loyal than a woman if he wants to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 02:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter