MichaelMorpurgo Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
0	Thousands of dads are left in shock as DIY paternity tests soar. Up to 30,000 tests are being performed every year, says Alphabiolabs. In the UK about 750,000 babies are born every year. Feminists want the test to be illegal without the written consent of the mother. lady kennedy obviously a real man hater. Well no, she's an 86 year old lawyer and leader of her community who made a well written argument based on child welfare and privacy grounds. An argument you presumably can't address, because instead of discussing the actual issue, you would rather label her as "a man hater" so you can conveniently ignore everything she actually said. "We will be recommending the creation of a special offence which makes it very clear to people that taking the DNA of some…	/r/MensRights	13/01/19 03:08 PM
-3	Thousands of dads are left in shock as DIY paternity tests soar. Up to 30,000 tests are being performed every year, says Alphabiolabs. In the UK about 750,000 babies are born every year. Feminists want the test to be illegal without the written consent of the mother. What are you talking about? Thousands of dads are left in shock as DIY paternity tests soar. Up to 30,000 tests are being performed every year, says Alphabiolabs. In the UK about 750,000 babies are born every year. Feminists want the test to be illegal without the written consent of the mother. Here's OPs title with the bit they made up handily highlighted in bold. The DNA testing debate is based on child welfare concerns, which is why it was made illegal in france. There are no "feminist" campa…	/r/MensRights	13/01/19 02:58 PM
-17	Thousands of dads are left in shock as DIY paternity tests soar. Up to 30,000 tests are being performed every year, says Alphabiolabs. In the UK about 750,000 babies are born every year. Feminists want the test to be illegal without the written consent of the mother. Let me guess, feminist? You just did the exact same thing OP did lol. You couldn't make it up! try a ctrl f search in the article for feminist, and then maybe read the article? or better yet, don't - the daily mail is a rag with nothing valuable to offer.	/r/MensRights	13/01/19 02:47 PM
-17	Thousands of dads are left in shock as DIY paternity tests soar. Up to 30,000 tests are being performed every year, says Alphabiolabs. In the UK about 750,000 babies are born every year. Feminists want the test to be illegal without the written consent of the mother. OP you made up the title to inspire outrage at a group you clearly dislike for personal reasons, how do you explain yourself? You should be ashamed (although obviously you aren't capable of that), and banned.	/r/MensRights	13/01/19 02:17 PM
0	Finally some common sense Did you read my comment? As i said, 6 people linked me the atlantic article, I'm not sure you read it because it doesn't back up your numbers anywhere. I'm also not sure you understand the difference between rape and "made to penetrate" even though I just explained it to you. Tbh the only reason i can think of that you can't grasp these simple concepts is intentional ignorance. Stay in your bubble /u/reddituser257.	/r/MensRights	08/06/18 03:38 PM
0	Finally some common sense It's actually 100% to 0% based on how you define rape. If you use the traditional definition that we accept as part of the English language - I.E Physical restraint/ Sex with someone unconscious / violence/ violent digital penetration then 0% are committed by women using the best numbers we have available. If you want to include sex while drunk (made to penetrate memes), please bare in mind you also have to include sex women engage in while drunk. This seems to be the kind of thinking that SJWs …	/r/MensRights	08/06/18 02:00 PM
1	Finally some common sense Oh god he's using "made to penetrate memes" Let's try to explain why these memes are stupid, you seem to have a basic understanding of how statistics are skewed right? "made to penetrate" Is a form of potential 'sexual assault', or rape if you want to use completely change the accepted definition involving psychological pressure and alcohol. ' If you include "made to penetrate" as "rape" for male victims, But, as all of the anti-feminist blogs citing this number do, Not include women who are pre…	/r/MensRights	08/06/18 01:31 AM
0	Finally some common sense How does men committing huge amounts of rape not affect men? don't you think that's a far more nuanced and important discussion for men to engage in? You don't think men's lives are ruined by this as well? What a close minded perspective. Men commit suicide at a vastly higher rate than women, maybe if we focused on the societal pressures that lead men (who aren't biologically programmed to be violent btw- at least i'm definitely fucking not) to act in violent manners, towards each other and towa…	/r/MensRights	08/06/18 01:20 AM
1	Finally some common sense Yeah sorry, I'm arguing with a lot of people. I mean, that wasn't my intent, to mislead people but according to the best statistics we have available that 99.99% number is indeed completely wrong. In fact, women committing rape (as its classified by the FBI or the CDC or the justice system) - is practically non-existent. We have no numbers for this due to it's comparative rarity. That would women digitally penetrating men, or physically restraining and forcing a sex act. in much the same way men…	/r/MensRights	08/06/18 01:10 AM
1	Finally some common sense I mean, that wasn't my intent, but according to the best statistics we have available that is indeed completely wrong. In fact, women committing rape (as its classified by the FBI or the CDC or the justice system) - is practically non-existent. We have no numbers for this due to it's comparative rarity. That would women digitally penetrating men, or physically restraining and forcing a sex act. in much the same way men digitally penetrating women, and restraining them and forcing a sex act is me…	/r/MensRights	08/06/18 12:07 AM
-2	Finally some common sense What a nuanced response, I can tell that you've used rational argumentation techniques before!	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 11:43 PM
3	Finally some common sense Your right in a way, grouping people based on race or gender can be a very negative act. I think it's justified if you focus on prevention, IE: We know young black men from poor backgrounds are more likely to commit violent crime - which has a deteriotive outcome on communities. Focusing on the root causes of that is a positive way to prevent further violent crime, as long as you have the assumption that no specific group are predisposed towards crime. So I feel the argument that we should focus…	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 11:09 PM
0	Finally some common sense "made to penetrate as rape" No generally speaking rape is statistically not counted like that, Because then you would also include the vast numbers of women who are passively pressured into sex. If you did count everyone who has had sex due to pressure as rape, pyschological ect, are you seriously saying that men would be ahead? That's the fatal flaw these arguments miss out on. You include non-violent, semi-consensual sex involving men as rape, but then completely ignore non-violent semi-consen…	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 10:59 PM
-1	Finally some common sense "it's a condolence to male rape victims that other men rape women." No, not at all. Absolutely not. All rape is terrible, and the majority of men who suffer rape suffer it at the hands of men. This isn't to say that rape isn't an issue that affects men, but rather instead of inventing statistics and pretending like women rape men, we should focus on issues that actually affect men. Men who rape also have their lives destroyed, and to deprive them of their humanity is disgraceful. To stop men rap…	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 09:02 PM
0	Finally some common sense "You are basically saying it doesn't matter, because women have it worse." No that's pretty much completely wrong - it absolutely does matter, every instance of sexual assault/rape is a moral negative, and we should address those negatives. It's not even about women having it worse (although they empirically do), If you want to focus on mens issues surrounding rape culture, and that's an admirable goal, instead of focusing on something that almost never happens, why not focus on rape that men co…	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 08:01 PM
2	Finally some common sense I mean isn't that the definition of a circle jerk though? And it's kinda stupid when you consider the actual problems men face. Men raping people is an issue that effects men as well, the social pressures that cause men to rape people are well documented, and affect more men than who actually rape. This kind of culture where a mans worth is decided by his quantity of sexual partners, or indeed having a sexual partner creates negative communities like /r/incels and makes a lot of men suffer from …	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 07:50 PM
1	Finally some common sense So lets condense this down to the beliefs you've stated, cause fuck me you make a good word salad. You think that all rape statistics are skewed by a societal bias, and in fact, contrary to all known evidence thousands of women are sexually assaulting men? You think the OP agreed with you on this even without saying that, and you feel you don't need any evidence or statistics to back up this assertion because all the evidence is wrong anyway? And then some nonsense about how I'm a hypocrite? I m…	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 07:40 PM
3	Finally some common sense Please link these FBI and CDC statistics that give completely contradictory information to the FBI and CDC statistics listed here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_the_United_States#Demographics Otherwise please re-consider your opinion because it's provably wrong. Women who sexually assault do so so rarely we have no numbers for the prevalence. Consider that, this a phenomena so rare, it's not even studied. Instead of making things up, try to see an MRA perspective on rape stats. Why do me…	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 07:22 PM
0	Finally some common sense The CDC Doesn't rank it like that, just the FBI. And no, you don't have to be a woman to be penetrated. Even if we ignore all that, sexual assault statistics (which would cover contact other than penertration) still reflects an identical version of reality. You can invent millions of reasons why the stats are wrong, but if you seriously think there are thousands of women going around sexually assaulting men, where is the actual evidence?	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 07:12 PM
1	Finally some common sense "I am not supporting the original views or intending to get involved in the debate, just point out how ridiculous your arguments are." No, that's not what you think you're doing. As of yet you haven't pointed out a single place where I was wrong, or used dishonest argumentation. So instead of doing that atm you are just wasting both of our time. Instead of vaguelly accusing me of arguing badly, why not copy paste a single quote where I did argue badly? I can do it for you "prove me wrong and if …	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 06:59 PM
-14	Finally some common sense Yeah absolutly! Pedophilia is a very under disscussed topic because peadophiles are so vilified in our current society, nobody attempts any serious academic study. That's a very valid point. Saying that's a huge factor in producing men who rape however is not true - that's a very minor factor in producing men who rape, if it's a factor at all. It's a large factor in producing peadophiles, but there is no evidence to suggest it accounts for a large number of rapists as well. Rape culture is more …	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 06:57 PM
-2	Finally some common sense I mean sure question the current paradigm, spend some time and some money trying to find women who rape people if you really want, that's not an objectionable issue. As the facts currently lie though, men commit nearly every single rape. That's a conversation that should be very relevant to MRA, as the societal pressures that make men rape people also negatively affect men who don't rape people. That's a far more productive conversation than desperately hunting for female rapists in a world appa…	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 06:53 PM
1	Finally some common sense Where? You haven't come up with a single counterpoint? Or a single example of me being dishonest? You just used a straw-man and proceeded to adhom. also "prove me wrong and if you can't you are wrong" Is the basis that journalists, scientists and anyone who thinks rationally uses to determine truth. Your concept of "I'm right and I don't need any proof" is pretty juvenile.	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 06:51 PM
0	Finally some common sense As i stated earlier, you can discuss male rape as much as you want. Obviously i have no problem with that. It is however incredibly hypocritical to focus on that subject and claim you are having "the entire conversation". Of those 7% of rape victims who are men, nearly all of those are committed by men. You won't be able to find any statistics that disagree with that, because female on male sexual assaults are so uncommon, we have no real stats for them. "imply bringing awareness of it to a prop…	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 06:49 PM
-1	Finally some common sense I mean thanks for googling that I guess. An OP-ED that openly admits there are no numbers available, and ends on an ambiguous question isn't evidence of a massive problem i'm afraid. Thanks for trying though.	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 06:35 PM
-2	Finally some common sense Wait What the fuck You fucking liar lol You just assumed that men and women are represented equally in rape stats, to invent a fucking rape stat. HOLY SHIT. Do you understand statistics at all? If you can't find a stat about women commiting rape, that's because it's a very rare occurence. That doesn't give you a licence to fucking invent it lol. You should seriously be ashamed of yourself. Godamn.	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 06:32 PM
-7	Finally some common sense Try top of all time And no, rape is pretty much a male problem. There aren't any stats available for how many women rape men because it's thought to be incrediably rare. We do know men rape around 20% of women by the time they are 30. So yeah, you really are having the 'entire' conversation with this shit lol.	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 06:31 PM
1	Finally some common sense I mean yeah it kinda does 91% of rape victims are female and 9% are male. 100% of these measured are committed by men. We have no stats for how many women are raping people, because it's so fucking rare. Try to find one please. Where are the stats for these thousands of rapes women are perpetrating?	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 06:29 PM
1	Finally some common sense "almost all your recent posts are aggressive or demeaning" Really? I rarely use aggressive or insulting language, and normally discuss quite nuanced topics with people. Maybe click context on some of those conversations and see who I was talking to to better understand my reactions.	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 06:21 PM
1	Finally some common sense Really? Analogys don't have to be about specific examples dude. Lets say society wants to stop thing A, 99.99% of people doing thing A are in group 1, and 0.01% of people doing thing A are in group 2. Focusing on group 2 is not having "all the conversation". Did you really need that broken down for you? I feel like you just wasted my time.	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 06:20 PM
0	Finally some common sense "om what I've seen women commit more violence than men by far" What you've seen is completely irrelevant to any serious conversation unfortunately. While your perspective is unique and valuable, it's also absolutely useless when it comes to a serious conversation about social change. That might be hard to read, but it's definitely true. If you have any serious scientific evidence, or any statistics that re-enforce your view, then by all means please post them. Otherwise sorry but my personal lif…	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 06:16 PM
-9	Finally some common sense Exactly! This is what reddit does on a daily basis. If you search Rape on reddit, and sort by top (ignoring celebrity's) the vast majority of posts are about women committing rape, from this subreddit and from KIA. If you want to have a real conversation about rape culture, maybe we should start by acknowledging that this is a predominately male problem? And then working on ways to fix that?	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 06:14 PM
-1	Finally some common sense I mean if your objective is to reduce rape, or have a conversation about rape culture isn't it relevant to discuss the main perpetrators of rape? The reason men rape is pretty inline with some MRA issues tbh, Toxic masculinity, Slut shaming, all these things impact men too. If you don't think a hypersexualised rapeculture hurts men then you've never seen the inhabitants of /r/braincels	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 06:13 PM
-23	Finally some common sense "that sounds like you're trying to blame someone for things" Read my comment again, but slower this time. Try to understand the sentences.	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 06:11 PM
-1	Finally some common sense "I would be glad to engage you in this discussion if you drop the manipulations and actually engage legitimately." says the person with nothing but a series of ad-hom attacks. This subreddit and most of reddit misrepresents violent crime in an attempt to skew the narrative against women. It's definitely not having the 'entire conversation'. When someone calls you out for dishonestly representing them replying with a "no u" is pretty immature dude. Argue against the above argument stated in clear…	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 06:08 PM
0	Finally some common sense This subreddit, and reddit in general does focus incrediably narrowly on crimes commited by women. This post is a further example of that. That's not the whole conversation that's a tiny segment of the converstaion being portrayed in a skewed way to meet a bias. It's very similar to how Reddit portrays violent crime in general, black on white crime and white on white crime receive far more attention than black on black crime or white on black crime. This is presumably because Reddit is mainly wh…	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 06:06 PM
0	Finally some common sense It's an analogy for how stupid this argument is. Do you understand analogys? It's like an example	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 06:04 PM
-3	Finally some common sense That's not what I said, I used the 99.9% as an analogy for why this argument was stupid. Nowhere did i state that 99.9% of rapes are committed by men. Please stop intentionally misrepresenting me.	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 06:04 PM
0	Finally some common sense As I already stated, OPS desire to have the 'entirety of the conversation' surrounding rape culture and pedophilia is highly hypocritical considering they are focusing on a tiny part of the conversation and ignoring the vast majority of the conversation. Does that make sense to you?	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 04:30 PM
0	Finally some common sense Re-framing an argument isn't dishonest, dishonestly re-framing an argument is. It's not complicated, can you point out a section where i dishonestly re-framed something?	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 04:29 PM
-6	Finally some common sense No i didn't rofl go read it again, I said ignoring 99.9% of a problem is stupid. I never said 99.9% of rapes are perpetrated by men. Hence why you didn't quote that lol. That's called a lie, you like and the fact you have to lie to make an argument demonstrates your clear bias and lack of ability.. Do you people really have nothing but straw-men and dishonest representation? I'm frankly dissapointed. This isn't the entireity of the conversation lol.	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 04:28 PM
-23	Finally some common sense Thats because you re-framed my argument in a dishonest and childish manner. If you want to have as OP stated the entire conversation about rape culture and pedophilia, focusing on a tiny section of it is the literal opposite. That's the hypocracy i'm highlighting. If you want to circle-jerk about whataboutism this is the wrong subreddit to do that my friend. This entire place is based on that premise lol. There is no problem having a conversation about a proportionally tiny section of rape cultu…	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 03:58 PM
-33	Finally some common sense No. Let's have the discussion though because discourse is good even when people try to strawman the fuck outta you. All un-consensual sex is bad. All violent crime is bad. These are paradigms i believe in, and society does to some extent as well, I don't know if you do but i'm going to assume you do. Men rape more men, and more women than women do. If you want to "talk about the issue in it's entirety" denying that fact is not talking about the issue in it's entirety. By focusing on 0.01% of rap…	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 03:49 PM
-56	Finally some common sense this account was deleted because the person who made it was proven to be impersonating a woman to promote a narrative. Not that women don't also promote this narrative, that's a very common thing. lets talk about pedophilia and rape culture in their entirety lol, lets discuss which group male or female commits more rape, surely that's the 'entirety' ? Lets discuss which group male or female commits more violent crime in general, and pedophilia specifically? Lets discuss school shooters, and terr…	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 03:35 PM
5	Woman at work tried to jump to the front of the line in the break room ... I f***ing think not! Is it true that there are entitled women in the world? Yes definitely, humanity as a whole has problems with entitlement. is that a definition you can hold 3.5 billion people too in general? Obviously not and the fact you try to means you have met terrible people in your life, or you are yourself a terrible person.	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/01/18 11:44 AM
-38	Woman at work tried to jump to the front of the line in the break room ... I f***ing think not! No, No you misunderstand. This sub isn't about factual accuracy lol, it's about finding things some random crazy woman has done that annoy you then we all get too call them dumb cunts and say fun shit like "who would rape her anyway" It's a wonderful magical place	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/01/18 06:46 AM
1	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Which article. I've read his confession and apology- if that's not enough for you frankly nothing is. If someone confesses and apologises- its a pretty fucking huge contortion of the facts to say they were innocent all along- and that would for me at least requre actual evidence. Obviously not for you, because you want this thing to fit a narrative. I don't think there's any point talking to you,, you have this idea in your head about how shit works and there's no amount of proof that would fit …	/r/PussyPassDenied	08/07/17 03:17 AM
1	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy You definetlty fucking didn't lol - you probably watched this 2 minute digitally altered clip and your entire opinion was already formed. Giving you too much credit you probably read the title, and that was enough for you.. Anything you see beyond that is just bullshit right? Because it challenges the conclusion you made in your head, and that lovely righteous indignation on behalf of all mankind.	/r/PussyPassDenied	08/07/17 03:11 AM
0	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy . It is pretty scary how 2k plus people can jump to the defence of a child molester now i think about it ..	/r/PussyPassDenied	08/07/17 02:33 AM
0	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy The digitally manipulated 2 minute clip? No thanks.	/r/PussyPassDenied	08/07/17 02:32 AM
1	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy He molested a 12 year old.	/r/PussyPassDenied	08/07/17 02:30 AM
1	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Just google his name rofl its really not fucking hard. Yeah, he didnt violently rape anybody- he still molested a 12 year old though, and served time for it. Such a strange thing to argue about lol.	/r/PussyPassDenied	08/07/17 02:30 AM
1	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Hey at least i don't miolest children!	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 12:35 PM
0	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy No, my argument is based on the face he admitted guilt, and has never recanted it. Your argument is based on the fact he took a plea deal- Get it right.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 12:34 PM
-1	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Where the fuck are you getting that from? A Digitally manipulated news report and a reddit comment section. Maybe read about the actual events before jumping to baseless conclusions.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 11:10 AM
0	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Why would i post evidence i'm not his attorney- there was evidence though, and it was enough to give this child molester 3 years in prison. The only possible reason you would be defending this child molester instead of the thousands of other child molesters is political- be as dishonest about your motivations as you want, they are clear for everyone to see .	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 11:09 AM
0	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy I mean, reading around the subject he defiantly molested a 12 year old. I feel more sorry for the 12 year old than this dickhead.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 11:06 AM
1	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy The good old "says the guy" argument. Flawless legal defence of a child molester, you should have been this guys lawyer!	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 11:05 AM
-1	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy we are talking about his apology to the victims in court, he still hasn't recanted his confession, but yeah sure lets just assume he's innocent because it makes a better story.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 11:03 AM
1	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy holy shit are you actually this dense? Why do you think this applys in this case as opposed to any other situation? Because of your political motivations. Open your damn eyes man, your bias as fuck.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 11:02 AM
-7	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Hey we can imagine a whole shitton of random situations, doesn't mean they happened and doesn't mean we should give this POS child molester the benefit of the doubt.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 11:01 AM
-2	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy People also often take pleas when they are guilty, like in this case.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 11:00 AM
1	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy You think he waited 3 years before going to trial because he was innocent? And then he pled guilty to the charges stated because he was innocent? Your mind is so warped around this issue i really don't see the point of this conversation, if a confession from the guilty party isn't enough to convince you, nothing is.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 03:07 AM
1	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy What the fuck are you talking about lol, you refuse to read any evidence but you still defend a convicted sex offender based on political motivations- me and you have such different moral standards i don't see the point in any further conversation.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 03:04 AM
0	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Double post.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 03:03 AM
0	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy He was 16 when he molested a 12 year old. That is wrong, and he deserves the 3 years he served in jail. Seeing as this became personal, frankly i never felt the urge to pursue girls 4 years below me in school, and if any of my peers had expressed that urge I probably would have contacted the police.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 03:03 AM
2	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy No he was 16. And yes i can honestly say that i didn't molest any 12 year olds when i was 16, and if any of my peers had, i would immediately contact the police.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 03:02 AM
-1	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Don't you feel a little bit disgusted that you defend someone who abused children? I mean, i get the joke, but calling me a child who was abused by this guy is a kind of fucked up way to make a joke considering there were literal children he abused...	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 02:38 AM
1	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy 16 assaulting a 12 year old. Still not ok. Second of all, get off your arse and read any of the articles under his name, they all contain roughly the same content- if you cant be bothered to google search i can't be bothered to link you shit. Maybe he's not a mentally diagnosed peadophile????? but he still sexually assaulted a 12 year old, when he was 16 so to me the difference is pretty damn arbitrary. Hey if you want i can just call him a sex offender..	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 02:27 AM
0	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy He apologised to his victims and admitted fault- he has never recanted this. I take testimony in court- and convictions in court as the most serious kind of evidence i can be presented with. Maybe you have different standerds- although frankly it's hard to not see a political bias seeing as the entire rational thinking world agrees with me- hence our current legal system.. You have no idea why he admitted to those charges, you weren't there- you may feel like you do, but if you are being intelle…	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 02:23 AM
-1	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy We are going very deep into the personal motivations of someone who hasn't made a single public statement about his personal motivations based as far as i can tell on a heavily edited news report and the political motivations of this subreddit- maybe feminism is a lie, maybe women are evil but at the same time maybe this person is a literal piece of shit paedophile and he's being heralded as some sort of bastion of freedom on literally 0 evidence..	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 02:06 AM
0	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Not in the slightest homie, i've been told to kill myself about 9 times within the last 3 minutes but i'm still calm as a cucumber :P	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 02:04 AM
1	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy The 2 minute news report? Which was recorded backwards and supposedly used no court admitted evidence? I'm not false to call a man a peadophile who assaults 12 year olds, you can lie if you want, although i don't know why are you are. here's a news article from the time that you obviously didn't read in your defence of this sick fuck.. "Kost admitted to touching the breasts of three girls without consent and attempting to have sexual contact with two minors" (he was 17 at the time) "sexually ass…	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 01:59 AM
-1	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy No you didn't, i don't know why are you lying lol but the first 5 results for his name give you more details on what he did and admitted too- i'm guessing your lying out of boredom or maybe just inability to read. either way not my job to entertain you, it's your job not to defend convicted paedophiles based on a political standpoint..	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 01:49 AM
0	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy I told you to google his name, and read the actual transcripts. I really can't be fucked too discuss this with you until you do- and when you do and read his confession, i frankly can't be fucked to discuss that with you either, frankly i can't be fucked to talk to someone who advocates for confessed paedophiles because they have some bizarre anti-feminist angle..	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 01:45 AM
-2	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy I call admitting to a crime you committed and apologising to the victims a pretty clear indication of guilt- so does every legal system in the world. I'll take your opinion based on a 2 minute news report analysing requested discovery without even a single comment on the criminal case as bullshit.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 01:43 AM
-2	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Google his name, it's not my place to inform you on the evidence involved its your place to not spout shit you don't bother to research into.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 01:39 AM
-9	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy You are saying a man who sexually assaulted a 12 year old is innocent of wrongdoing because in your mind sexually assaulting 12 year olds is morally ok? I'm sorry i'm blocking your Reddit account- i don't converse with paedophiles or paedophile advocates. I find your kind despicable..	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 01:38 AM
2	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy No they didn't- and yes legally and morally you do. There is no evidence of a conspiracy, discovery has been requested- no evidence has yet been disclosed. There is no evidence of anything until discovery has been finished.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 01:37 AM
0	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Google his name. It's not my job to do basic research for you- it's your job to not spout uniformed opinions on a public forum without research.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 01:36 AM
-2	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Hey dw i'll remove it, you are right it's wrong to be flippant when discussing peadophile's.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 01:02 AM
1	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Right- we agree he deserved his jail sentence then- now we go to a second legal issue, whether the women accused did anything wrong. I personally will wait till a court hears the case to pass judgement- but feel free to pass judgement early if this convicted paedophile strikes you as a bastion of honesty..	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 12:58 AM
0	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Admitting to sexually assaulting children in court is a lie now? based on what? He admitted it, he has been charged with it, and no new evidence has come to light to deny it. Sure there might have been other bad evidence, maybe even a conspiracy against him as his lawyers allege- they still admit, and he still admits sexual assault against a 12 year old- even with the new requested discovery. The fact you think this is a minor point is fucking bizarre to me.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 12:55 AM
-4	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy the accusation was that he was 16 and assaulted someone who was 12. Where did you get your source from because everything i have seen disagrees with it.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 12:52 AM
-2	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Lol how fucking strange that you hold this one person to be above the law- he personally apologised to the TWELVE YEAR OLD victim in court. even with the recent evidence, HE STILL ADMITS THAT HE SEXUALLY ASSAULTED A TWELVE YEAR OLD. you are a strange person for defending this man.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 12:51 AM
-10	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy I'm referring not to his plea deal but his personal apology to his victims in court, and him admitting he was wrong. It takes a strange stretch to make a self admitted paedophile into some kind of hero.. any 16 year old who sexually assaults a 12 year old deserves time in prison.. even if he just grabs their breasts or other parts, they are 12 he is 16. If you think that is acceptable there is something wrong with you in my eyes.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 12:49 AM
0	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Yeah he recieved a sentance, and good thing too. people who assault 12 year olds should have their integrity questioned at every oppurtunity.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 12:48 AM
-2	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy he was 16 and he sexually assaulted a 12 year old. He admitted doing this. how can you possibly defend him. You think a 12 year old can consent to sexual activity with a 16 year old? there is something wrong with your moral compass mate.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 12:47 AM
-6	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy I understand that someones testimony to a court is truthful- if you deny that then you are pretty much denying the whole legal system..	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/07/17 12:46 AM
-5	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy I mean he admitted in court sexually assaulting a 12 year old for personal gratification, you want to make this about me for some reason? Ok fine. Still he should fucking rot for his crimes, and he himself admits that..	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 11:57 PM
-5	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy 100%	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 11:55 PM
1	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy google his name, read his own testimony.	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 11:55 PM
2	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy The other articles describe what he himself said in court. Google his name, read his own testimony, and accept that you are currently defending a self admitted paedophile. someone who preyed on minors for sexual gratification, some as young as 12.	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 11:55 PM
-10	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Hey defend a paedophile all you want man, at least read what he himself said about his conduct in court before you accuse me of someshit brah.	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 11:54 PM
-5	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Read all the other article's he admitted to sexually assaulting a 12 year old in court. Your fucking biased.	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 11:54 PM
-3	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy No it hasn't at any point, he admitted it, and is serving time for it. Even his close family members admit he did this. Denying it is denying the truth at this point, for your strange and untrue rhetoric.	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 11:41 PM
-10	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Maybe don't sexually assault children then? He admitted it- maybe part of the allegations were false- but he is serving time for what he admitted too. Which was sexual abuse of a minor..	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 11:37 PM
-12	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy What about the 12 year old he admitted to sexually assaulting? Explain that you POS	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 11:36 PM
-4	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy The rule should be- sexually assault a minor- spend time in jail. Reddit is a strange place when people defend paedophiles under an anti-feminist bandwagon.. Frankly you should be ashamed of yourself.	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 11:35 PM
-1	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy At the very least he's guilty of sexually assualting someone who is 12 years old- And deserves jail time..	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 11:35 PM
-1	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy I never touched a girl who was 5 years younger than me's breasts in high-school. Is it so hard to believe that someone who sexually assaults minors deserves time in jail?	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 11:34 PM
8	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy a 12 year old cannot consent to sexual activity. Disgusting to suggest otherwise.	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 11:33 PM
17	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy They were 12. He sexually assaulted 12 year olds. That is fucked up, and he should be in prison.	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 11:33 PM
2	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy He openly admits to sexually assaulting a 12 year old and you call people saying that's wrong "white knights".. You either have some strange agenda or something deeply wrong with your morals..	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 11:33 PM
2	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Those girls were 12 years old- its bizzare you try to defend him.	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 11:32 PM
3	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy But he admitted sexually assaulting a 12 year old. Thats pretty clear guilt imo. Let him rot lol.	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 11:31 PM
-2	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy You need to pressure the authorities to help someone who openly admits to sexually assaulting a 12 year old? This is some bizzare doublethink going on here- just because this single news article slants something in a certain way- means you can ignore the mans own testimony on his actions? He assaulted a 12 year old. He should be in jail.	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 11:30 PM
12	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy I mean, maybe parts of their testimony were unreliable but he still sexually assaulted a 12 year old. Hard to paint him as a hero in this situation.. http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/pinal/2017/02/17/san-tan-valley-man-tyler-kost-released-jail-after-3-years-teen-sex-crimes-case/98070516/	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 11:29 PM
-6	13 accusers put guy in jail for a year over rape charges, now proved to be a huge conspiracy Reading around the issue it's clear that he sexually assaulted several minors according to his own testimony. Bizarre to paint this as an anti-feminist thing when the guy admits to sexually preying on 12 year old girls.	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 11:28 PM
1	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights Well a lot of competent people in stem fields consider it a problem- one that potentially holds back STEM in general - and therefore humanity. I guess your never going to acknowledge that though..	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 03:38 PM
1	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights It's not a mystery force lol its a scientifically recognised phenomena called social conditioning, and politicians and scientists are working right now to change it.	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 03:08 PM
1	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights So you can't possibly understand how that same problem might also affect women in a negative way? you just admitted gender pressures hurt men- is it that much of a stretch to say they might hurt women as well?	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 03:08 PM
0	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights Biology is a science based on peer review- not your opinion. Sorry but if you are making a general assumption about something you need evidence to back it up- especially when making claims as big as yours. This may be hard for you to understand- but when you use science as an argument without evidence, the counter argument is asking you for evidence. When you don't provide any, because you can't it becomes pretty clear that you made up your argument because it fitted what you feel to be anecdota…	/r/PussyPassDenied	06/07/17 12:05 AM
0	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights Because that's the problem?	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/07/17 08:53 PM
1	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights You just stated things that are your personal opinion like they are real science. Maybe learn to differentiate between the two - in real science whne you say something like women chose jobs like social services because of hormones- first you need to rule out every other cause- Seeing as that is impossible your conclusion is purely anecdotal.	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/07/17 08:53 PM
1	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights Yeah mb	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/07/17 03:34 PM
1	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights http://scholarworks.uvm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1077&context=hcoltheses http://genderandset.open.ac.uk/index.php/genderandset/article/viewFile/405/672 https://www.human.cornell.edu/hd/upload/Ceci-Williams-Barnett-2009.pdf here's some more, that are conveniently free and clickable-	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/07/17 01:00 PM
1	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights Oh sorry i'm discussing this with roughly 20 different people simultaneously it's hard to keep track. Toglia, Thomas V. "Gender Equity Issues In CTE And STEM Education." Tech Directions 72.7 (2013): 14-17. Academic Search Complete. Web. 11 Dec. 2014. Xu, Yonghong. "Gender Disparity In STEM Disciplines: A Study Of Faculty Attrition And Turnover Intentions." Research In Higher Education 49.7 (2008): 607-624. Academic Search Complete. Web. 11 Dec. 2014. Those are some good starting study's if you n…	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/07/17 12:56 PM
1	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights No, i'm not stating anything, i'm asking the question if it's not societal pressure, what other explanation do people provide? That is all i have done, ask the question, what explanation do you provide - if you want to anecdotally dismiss social conditioning, you need to provide me with an alternative. If you aren't providing a alternative explanation then frankly i don't really see the point of this conversation.	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/07/17 12:32 PM
1	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights This is a bizarre comment, I'm going to ignore the epliptic dig because you made an actual point after it. Personality is something that i have literally never heard generalised like this, it's obviously not a scientific response but a personal one stemming from your anecdotal feelings about women in general.	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/07/17 12:07 PM
1	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights Fantastic comment, the only thing i would add is that if we look at case studys in places where there is even less focus on female education, we can see that societal pressure has a huge impact on education in general. We can even use those case study's to analyse male attitudes on education, people from rural communities are much less likely to go into educational fields- does this mean that rural people are genetically less likely? Well i know which explanation is scientifically logical, and t…	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/07/17 12:07 PM
0	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights I'm sorry but anecdotal evidence is not enough to believe in a genetic difference- i would need actual biologists stating that there is one present to dismiss social conditioning as a factor- and there are none.	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/07/17 12:05 PM
1	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights Denying social pressure's very existence is foolish, Look at any case study in the world- choose any country and measure their religion against their children's religion. To say that those religious differences are caused by genetic factors would be idiotic..	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/07/17 12:03 PM
1	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights Men and women, That's how societal pressure works, its from society which is made from both genders.	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/07/17 11:59 AM
1	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights IQ is a sociological factor not a genetic one	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/07/17 11:58 AM
0	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights I'm going to assume you are actually asking the question instead of being dishonest so i will try and explain this for you, Families growing up in certain communities are more likely to produce children who are slanted towards different educational interests. So a child with parents who are drug dealers- is more likely to become a criminal. A child with parents who are doctors is more likely to become a doctor Agree so far? Good. Lets refer to this as social conditioning, Because it applys on a …	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/07/17 03:00 AM
1	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights Opposite problem tbh, if you wanted nurses to be paid at nfl player salaries you would be artificially planning an economy, atm both nfl players and nurses are paid how the market values them- I personally see no issue with this.	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/07/17 02:54 AM
1	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights "Women generally tend to take less risks and work steadily rather than to elevate themselves over others. That's observable even in simple tribal societies." This is absurd, you are making a huge huge statement here, with zero evidence to back it up. Maybe you don't realise how large your claims are because you stated them so over simply but this would be the lifework of several scientific communities. When you say "women generally" you are talking about 3.7 billion people- the difficultly of sa…	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/07/17 02:46 AM
1	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights So if it's an outrageous binary choice, what alternative are you suggesting? Why do women not enter Stem fields in your opinion? If it's not because of societal pressure- which you already stated you don't believe in, what alternative hypothesis do you believe in? I'm open for some shades of grey here, but if you state that you believe in genetics affecting choices in degree even a little bit, you are going against scientific consensus. Please by all means give me a alternative that isn't constr…	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/07/17 02:42 AM
2	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights Right, so societal pressures affect both men and women in negative ways. Great we agree!	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/07/17 02:34 AM
1	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights Bottom line is lack of women in stem fields is a problem, one that is caused by societal pressure.	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/07/17 01:14 AM
4	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights Because hypothetically we are wasting potential scientific advancement for no reason	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/07/17 01:11 AM
19	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights Brilliant comment, but what does this have to do with societal pressure pushing women into non-stem fields? And what alternative scientific hypothesis do you offer? If you think rationally about other examples, people from rural communities being less likely to pursue education ect, its pretty easy to prove rationally that societal pressure has an impact on education - it's a hell of a lot harder to prove that genetic pressure has- and in fact it has not been proven.	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/07/17 08:43 PM
19	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights Did you read the original post? It's saying that women choose non stem fields and therefore earn less, i'm asking why people think that is - if art like this is stupid because women pick worse majors, and therefore there is no inbuilt sexism, surely we should ask the question why do women pick worse majors. the answer in conventional science is due to inbuilt societal pressures so are people saying that this is because of genetic causes instead? Try to keep up brah it was pretty self explanatory…	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/07/17 08:09 PM
-3	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights So you think women have a genetically difference away from stem fields? Great, now we have an actual opinion stated, we can discuss this. The hypothisis that women are genetically worse at stem subjects is a very controversial one, and is not considered mainstream science. the majority of psychological and biological scientists (who also happen to be men) believe in societal pressures, is it possible that the fact you hold that opinion, and raised a daughter, in anyway influenced her? Do you thi…	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/07/17 08:04 PM
12	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights So what i'm asking you, isn't what you think the problem Isn't, it's what you are saying the problem is. This might sound complicated, but if you read what i said, i was asking for an opinion, not an attack. My comment ended in a question about your opinion, you did not answer that question, so we will try again. Do you believe women are genetically inferior to men, or do you believe societal pressure is what causes these differences? Because you refuse to state an opinion instead listing for so…	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/07/17 07:59 PM
-5	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights I mean, you can generalise society if you use statistics, that's what statistics are. To use your own stupid argument, how dare you generalize and say millions of young lads were blown to smithereens in world war one, my grandfather wasn't blown to smithereens, fuck off and stop telling me he was.	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/07/17 06:13 PM
-12	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights Why? Surely if this problem affects both men AND women, we need more whining from both sides?	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/07/17 06:12 PM
-8	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights So these are problems of a sexist society then? Sounds a little bit like feminism to me there brah, careful..	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/07/17 06:11 PM
51	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights So like, does everyone up-voting this assume women are just less efficient at picking degrees than men? Is this like saying women are stupider? Because i would ask, why do women go for less profitable degrees, how do we solve that.. I'm starting from a basis that women and men are of equal intelligence and any differences in pay grade ect are a societal problem - potentially there is a problem in classrooms or even in gender stereotypes pushed onto people from a young age, this is because otherw…	/r/PussyPassDenied	04/07/17 06:10 PM