TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Michamus Archive

View 1 post and 108 comments by Michamus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Blue Pill ExampleMichamus/r/TheRedPill10/07/15 07:17 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-7

Male primates with smaller genitals tend to make more noise and be more aggressive. This is what "small dick energy" is. Also, dudes make a way bigger deal about dick size than women do. Especially since most women can't even finish with purely PIV sex. Other skills are more important. https://animalscene.ph/2019/05/10/male-primates-with-smaller-genitalia-compensate-by-being-more-flashy-and-aggressive/
/r/MensRights30/12/22 07:04 PM
-13

Whatever makes you feel better, champ. One day you'll grow up.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 06:59 PM
-1

By holding up a mirror. Money doesn't fix the insecurity from his vulnerable narcissism. The dude got into a fight with a teenager, lost, and then pwned himself with authorities. lol
/r/MensRights30/12/22 06:56 PM
-40

Andrew Tate is a narcissist man-child. Sometimes you have to use ‘the mean words’ to shame these people. Also small dick energy has nothing to do with your dick size.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 02:25 PM
2

What if I told you to speak for yourself?
/r/seduction29/10/19 02:39 PM
5

Guys, this is a nod to Clinton's statement that women have always been the primary victims of war.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/10/19 10:33 PM
5

Or the entire conversation was made up and they genuinely can't think of a response to what they said. It's like those stories that end with the person running out of the room.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/19 07:50 AM
5

It's becoming increasingly obvious you have zero hand-to-hand experience. inb4 "What the fuck did you just say about me?"
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/18 06:59 PM
10

A rear naked choke has very little to do with forearm strength. It's almost pure bicep. So it would be his grip against her biceps and pecs. The hand of the choking arm is actually locked in the elbow of the other arm. The other arm's hand is behind the head of the victim. Then you use the bicep of your other arm to tighten the choking arm, with the choking arm's hand locked in place by the combined force of the choking arm's hand grip and non-choking arm's bicep. Also, back in my military days,…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/18 05:09 PM
2

When a person actually passes out, they fall backward. In the video, he fell backward and she side-stepped to avoid his fall.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/18 04:48 PM
2

If anything, the smaller the more dangerous. Skinny arms get between the chest and neck with a lot less clearance, giving you less reaction time. ​
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/18 04:47 PM
7

This happens in pretty much any company. Sales get showered with as many personnel as they need and are paid generously. Support is treated like they should be grateful for whatever they get.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/18 04:43 PM
9

Even a slack-jawed public defender will be able to create a compelling defense for her, though. Her ass was slapped, she turned around, feared for her life and immediately attacked him. Hey, if it works for cops, right?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/18 04:42 PM
3

Edit: Just got banned from /r/TwoXChromosomes for this comment. Welcome to the club! /r/2x is as bad as T_D and other cult subreddits. They prefer the safety of an echo chamber over the free exchange of ideas.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/18 04:16 AM
4

Damn you two are retarded af.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/18 08:43 AM
1

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/stress-and-sex/201401/touchy-subject-the-health-benefits-masturbation
/r/MensRights07/12/17 04:52 PM
1

Your anecdote is irrelevant in the face of data.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 03:59 PM
1

Well that settles it, boys!
/r/MensRights07/12/17 03:40 PM
1

lol
/r/MensRights06/12/17 04:36 PM
2

Expressed this way, that's right... Let's say I eat snacks before dinner time, therefore when dinner comes, I'm not hungry. You still ate 1 time in that period. I thought that logic was fairly common understanding. Seeing as we're talking about logic, you're aware your argument falls under false equivalence, yes? But over masturbation makes it drop You cite your source stating your case. Here's three reputable sources disputing that claim. [First] [Second] [Third]
/r/MensRights06/12/17 03:56 PM
10

Some men will grip their penis tightly when masturbating. This can potentially cause sensitivity issues with normal intercourse. The solution is for them to stop gripping their penis so tightly. And reducing libido, well that's just logical... Explain to me how masturbation reduces the frequency at which you desire sexual release? That'd be like saying eating reduces the number of times you get hungry. worthless reward was wrong, I meant it's a reward you obtain through little effort. That's jus…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 03:00 PM
5

/r/ihavesex
/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:51 PM
2

You do realize it’s not a zero sum game, right?
/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:27 PM
8

This sounds like some of that TRP retardation that touts the opposite of scientific data. Jacking it is a completely different part of your sexuality than sex and not doing it regularly can result in lower t levels and prostate cancer.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:24 PM
7

Stop death-gripping your dick and everything will be fine. As for reducing libido and being a worthless reward, that’s just retarded.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:22 PM
6

It’s not a who has it worse contest. It’s a reference point, ya dingus.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:15 PM
14

My Wife is an engineer and says it's like working with a bunch of regular dudes. Recently one guy made a holocaust joke and was fired a week later. A bunch of people were getting ready to protest, including her. The company said they'd fire anyone that did so. The corporate culture is way too PC for anything like you're describing to fly. She's also the best-paid engineer in the company, so I guess that wage gap doesn't apply to her either.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/17 05:13 AM
17

I have actually had a discussion that started almost identical to this one. The chick had an English degree instead of Women's Studies. She said she didn't get a STEM degree because STEM didn't interest her. I asked if perhaps that might be the case with a lot more women than she might have thought. She said she hadn't considered that and the conversation moved on.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/17 05:05 AM
42

We really should find a way to fix all these soggy knees.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/17 05:01 AM
14

I mean, the jokes aren't really all that similar, other than being about the same subject. The whole "I'd never hit a woman" bit is pretty much mandatory in contemporary society, so it's no surprise it's in both.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/17 04:24 AM
0

Just did yesterday. Thanks anyway though.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 04:06 PM
1

You do realise that you never mentioned anything about them having zero filter in your original comment? The little information in my comment about the person I was talking about sure didn't keep you from behaving as though you knew what was going on better than I did.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 01:36 AM
1

So the person that is the epitome of zero filter decided to be passive aggressive for once in their life. Got it.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 12:11 AM
10

Once the internalized misogyny argument materialized, mainstream feminism became a religion.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 07:40 PM
5

In many societies, the political office doesn't really mean much. If you were to hop in a time machine and go back to classical Sparta, you'd have a hard time convincing anyone the kings and Gerousia ran Sparta. The Heiresses held the real power.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 07:39 PM
9

tearing other women down Which is almost immediately followed by "is a form of internalized misogyny resulting from the patriarchy." I dig that they acknowledge such behavior exists, but obfuscating the root cause doesn't help anyone.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 07:34 PM
7

It's like slut shaming. Only women and incels bag on a chick that puts out.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 07:32 PM
1

Says she doesn't care what mean think of what she wears Wears the hottest thing a woman can wear.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 07:30 PM
3

I help out at my kiddos' school. On Friday one of the staff said "You must really like those style of jeans to have so many pairs of them." I just chuckled and agreed. In reality, I'd worn the same exact pair of jeans all week. I mean, I shower daily and have normal hygiene. I just don't see the point of changing perfectly clean looking jeans every day. When I was in the Army, unless I was in the field, I would wear the same uniform all week too. Lots of other guys did it too and I could never t…
/r/MensRights15/10/17 07:28 PM
7

So, you're telling me comparing two cases that both involve violence, with one getting off scot-free and the other getting a pass, isn't comparable?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:57 AM
1

When a publication has a biased slant that would be against the conclusion of their article, you can bet that there's veracity to it. It would be like the Mormon profit coming out and saying Joseph Smith was a liar. The fact he stated such a conclusion, despite his bias, speaks volumes.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 06:47 PM
11

Are you looking for statistics, or philosophy?
/r/MensRights15/08/17 02:53 PM
18

Knowledge is currency. /u/sopun effectively just gave /u/jerseymayan a $5 bill. Would you call someone who does that, a bitch?
/r/MensRights15/08/17 02:51 PM
1

They're also the type to be attracted to positions of power.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/17 02:30 AM
1

Sounds like you hit the nail on the head.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/17 09:18 PM
78

Men are used to it. In our world competence is the bare minimum and at any time your capabilities will be questioned. Women are entering the world of men and finding out it isn't sunshine and rainbows.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/17 12:32 AM
40

The problem is, you can't win with these people. If you put a female lead in, they'll complain about her not wearing in clothing. If you cover her up, they'll complain about her wearing too much clothing. Make her boobs big and you're being sexist. Make them too small and you're removing her femininity. The best bet is to not give a fuck what they think and do your thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 11:35 PM
10

He's referring to that particular guy being there, not the guy's gender.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/17 11:33 PM
35

Nah bro. You multiply by their number on the hotness scale. If a 1 tells you they've been with two dudes, they're most likely not lying.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/17 07:30 PM
0

It's so strange that an inherently patriarchal religion that oppresses women has male militants. Whoda thunk!
/r/MensRights06/06/17 10:53 PM
1

You think this allows us to discuss better with the opposition??? No. I know it does, because it has greatly increased the productivity of discussions with those who believe women are at a disadvantage in western society. When you get them to understand that their belief is predicated upon the very assumption that women are merchants and men are customers, it makes navigating them toward recognizing the inherent inequality that creates, that much easier. No we all know men look for sex more than…
/r/MensRights06/06/17 06:35 PM
35

I mean, he wasn't saying their reasoning was good. He just explained what it was.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 01:34 AM
1

The G forces from that acceleration probably snapped the single mom's neck.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/17 01:30 AM
1

Things can make sense and be wrong. Aether made sense, but was wrong. Firmament belief made sense, but was wrong. My metaphor was to paint the logic the majority of people have accepted at an axiomatic level, regarding sexual value. Women are generally regarded as sexually valuable and men cheap. Whether this is an inborn trait honed through evolution, or a cultural construct, is up for debate. However, even if it's an inborn trait, it doesn't necessarily mean that it's a beneficial one, in mode…
/r/MensRights05/06/17 04:23 PM
19

It's not a matter of whether I mind it. I'm merely addressing the fact with a metaphor. It helps some people recognize why the behavior exists, thereby allowing it to be directly approached, with eyes wide open. Knowing the rationale behind a cultural idea helps a great deal.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 11:40 PM
40

It makes a lot more sense when you realize men are considered customers and women are considered store owners. You can't rob a customer by giving them your product. You can rob a store owner when taking their product without permission.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 09:18 PM
5

I have, twice.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 12:53 AM
6

so I'm assumed to be on the opposite. No. You made an unsubstantiated statement. Now you want to back out of it. You don't get to act like I'm the asshole for telling you to back your shit up.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 12:09 AM
2

I genuinely don't understand how you can call a question a "positive claim". What I quoted wasn't a question. It was a statement that claimed men have been able to successfully claimed they were too drunk to consent. The exact quote: your statement makes it sound like a man can't claim he was too drunk to consent. This is a pretty clear-cut positive claim. You are directly challenging his negative claim, with a positive claim.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 11:56 PM
9

You made a positive claim, which was: a man can successfully claim he was too drunk to consent. The onus probandi is on the person making the positive claim. So, I asked if there has been a case of a man successfully using the "too drunk to consent" defense. At this point, the ball is in your court.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 10:43 PM
7

your statement makes it sound like a man can't claim he was too drunk to consent. Is there an instance of this occurring?
/r/MensRights23/05/17 10:26 PM
2

It can be for multiple reasons. Male warfare can't really be selected against, since male reproduction is cheap and fast. If our species had larger females, warfare between women would be a major selective disadvantage, as their reproduction is expensive and slow.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 10:25 PM
5

This actually reminds me of a recent video I saw. A self-proclaimed feminist was going about telling random park-goers about mansplaining and manterrupting. Of course, seeing as these are your average people, none of them knew what she was talking about. She kept trying to get the girlfriends/wives to agree that their husbands interrupt them, but none of the women agreed. So, naturally, she said the women were ignorant. These people were very civil with her. They genuinely wanted to understand h…
/r/MensRights19/05/17 08:29 AM
10

They're the female version of neckbeards. They want a disciplined mate that has no standards.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/17 10:24 PM
32

She wasn't some "innocent" girl. That doesn't matter to white knights.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 08:27 AM
2

I was a manager for AT&T Wireless 14 years ago. I would aim for attractive women and men. Attractive people sell more stuff, hands down. Except this one guy. He was missing some teeth, smelled a little funky, but a genuine guy. He could sell ice to an Eskimo.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 07:15 AM
6

I'm a moderate and I've met a few level headed leftists. They're usually social liberals raised in blue-collar families. It's the ones born upper-middle class and above that you have to watch out for. They think they're better than everyone else and above reproach.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/17 05:15 AM
3

Absolutely not. In this particular case, I get the feeling the officer may have contradicted himself somewhere along interrogation. Once that happens, the prosecution can make a decent case that you're an unreliable witness. In such a case, the only reliable witness would be the victim. In any and all cases where law enforcement want to "interview" you, especially in criminal cases, don't speak. Request an attorney and talk to the attorney separately. They are far better at forming a defense tha…
/r/MensRights05/01/17 05:21 AM
1

Also, the legal definition of "assault" in most states is "an act, criminal or tortuous, that threatens physical harm to a person, whether or not actual harm is done." Usually a requirement of capability is included.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 02:45 AM
1

/r/nothingisreal
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/16 01:55 PM
1

"You're probably the constant in that equation"
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/16 08:54 PM
557

"Is chivalry dead?" "Yes, feminism killed it. That was the point after all."
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/16 04:44 AM
-1

Alright.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/16 08:24 AM
20

/r/nothingeverhappens
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/16 02:56 AM
2

You're basically saying no man can change their mind No, I'm not. I'm saying there are particular men and women that won't change their mind, simply because you told them something they already knew.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/16 05:48 AM
-1

Oh the irony. You do realize you have yet to answer my question, right? Everything you've written so far has been an avoidance of it.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 11:18 PM
5

how more education/discussion can be a bad thing. The problem is, that education is extremely biased toward male on female rape. It's to the point that female on male rape isn't even acknowledged as possible. For instance, drunken sex is generally regarded as rape, when the woman is drunk, regardless if the male is drunk too. With men, being drunk and getting duped into sex is regarded as a joke. The old "beer goggles" joke, where men wake up with a woman they would not have ordinarily consented…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 11:05 PM
-8

You really need to work on your examples. They're kind of shitty.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 10:53 PM
6

That's a strange claim to make. Generally, I've seen people argue that generally, people already know what rape is, even a rapist. Educating people on rape is no different than educating people on robbery. Bother criminals already know what they did was wrong and all you're going to teach people is that the excuses they made weren't good ones. "She was asking for it, the way she was dressed" for rape is no different than "you gotta do what you gotta do, to survive" for robbery. Bother people kno…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 10:52 PM
-6

That's kind of a shitty example.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 10:50 PM
-4

Can you give an example?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 10:43 PM
5

Sure and that's a common claim I've run into. The concept that there are men out there that need to be "educated" on what rape is. However, no one ever points to studies or any other sort of supporting evidence. Blanket statements are made and the followup is usually the obvious, such as "that's my opinion" or something along those lines.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 10:36 PM
9

I've yet to see that claim substantiated with any sort of evidence in the form of studies.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 10:31 PM
17

Those men already know what they're doing is wrong. Educating them isn't going to change anything.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 10:30 PM
18

Teaching someone how to protect themselves from crime doesn't imply that children aren't being taught what rape is. Imagine interjecting someone giving their child advice on avoiding robbery and stating "maybe you should teach people not to rob". It's silly. People know robbery isn't okay and the one's who rationalize it don't care about your message.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 09:50 PM
7

The grey area hadn't existed for decades by the time the movement was conceived. Marital rape was considered illegal by the 90s.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 09:46 PM
38

Talking about the past is all well and good, however it's pointless speculation. The "teach men rape is wrong" movement came about well after any age you're referring to.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 09:22 PM
11

I'm pretty sure that group doesn't exist.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 08:13 PM
2

stop drinking Budweiser shitty products Damn, I'm way ahead of that power curve.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 07:49 PM
231

I've never understood the "Teach men rape is wrong" movement. The men who would listen, already know it's wrong. The men who need to listen, don't care.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 07:44 PM
2

Man, that was a great video. Thanks for sharing it.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/16 07:08 PM
106

It's hilarious, because you look at how a man explains something to a woman and it's identical to how he explains it to another man. In fact, men spend a lot of fucking time explaining things to each other, because it's more important to know what needs to be done, than worry about who's in charge.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/16 09:18 AM
1

shouldn't They probably should have used that word to better describe their position. Given the absence of it though, I think it's safer to conclude that they don't realize a misdemeanor is a crime.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/16 07:52 PM
40

I'd wager they did read it and have no clue what a misdemeanor is.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/16 02:13 AM
3

Socialism maintains a class based society, whereas communism based on Marxism is classless. Karl Marx did not promote socialism.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/15 03:04 AM
1

You're making the mistake of equating money with smv. Money is a component to SMV. This is why these ultra-wealthy sugar daddies are still beta orbiters. SMV is more about presence, demeanor and capacity to create order, with wealth being a subset. Remember, women look for different men for different jobs. She doesn't care if Chad Thundercock is loaded, because she knows beta bucks will pay for the kid.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/15 06:16 PM
2

Billion dollar industries have been established to satisfy a woman's desire to appear 16 again.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 04:06 PM
8

Funny thing though is she ended up getting arrested for not putting out.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 03:42 PM
30

You don't need to. A bonds to C, T bonds to G. So ACGG would never exist. It would be ACTG or ACGT. The fact that you made this mistake demonstrates a lack of knowledge of basic parts of DNA. Wait, let me guess, you didn't care enough to do it right? Ha, sure.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/15 12:20 AM
1

Honestly, don't try and figure it out. There's really nothing to be gained from reviewing this interaction, except one point. You gave her a choice. You will have more success in future encounters if you assume she's interested and behave as such. Don't ask "either or", just say "Lets get out of here and X".
/r/TheRedPill03/04/15 08:18 AM
1

Wow. I'm not sure how this happened. I have my setting at "newest", so I didn't even think to check dates. Good catch man.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/15 07:45 AM
2

when boyfriend becomes husband, and then husband becomes Daddy, the family familiarity dynamic makes having sex less and less appealing. Honestly, I believe he has this backward. The dynamic in a toxic relationship will often shift from Boyfriend to Husband to Son. The dudes who complain the most about not getting any are often casually referred to as "children", in front others, by their wives.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/15 07:39 AM
2

So, my question is, aside from a pre-nup. What is the most RP way to go about doing this, how would you guys go about it if you were in my shoes, and how would you go about conditioning a woman given this context? At the end of the day, being "Alpha" or "RP" comes down to living the life you want and improving it every day. If you want to honor your culture and traditions, then follow it as best you can. While courting girls, vet them thoroughly. Since this is a forced thing, they're probably co…
/r/TheRedPill03/04/15 07:21 AM
9

Having confidence in your value and demonstrating it is really all you need. I married my wife 11 years ago after 2 1/2 years of dating. I was the breadwinner for the first year of our marriage and sole provider for 7 years of our marriage. During this time my wife had been attending college for a BS in Network Engineering. I was injured in Afghanistan and was being medically retired. My wife came to me about half way through the year long process and said "How do you feel about me working and y…
/r/TheRedPill03/04/15 07:11 AM
2

It's interesting, no doubt, but I caution anyone before making concrete conclusions from the study to look at the setup of it. It's pretty simple really. The feminist hypothesis is h=p>.5 on male proportioned consumption of violent porn. The reality is h=p<.5 on male proportioned consumption of violent porn. Their hypothesis has been demonstrated to be false by these statistical results. In fact, I would wager that if you asked the average feminist what proportion of men they felt consumed viole…
/r/TheRedPill03/04/15 05:57 AM
1

This data is useless without knowing the total number if women using the site. Really, it's not. The hypothesis was "Women view "violent categories" in greater proportion than men". It's not an evaluation of total site traffic, rather the category traffic. In this case, they have a 100% sample size to target population. If that initial sample is 0.0001% of the female population then quite frankly this tells us very little. I have a feeling you haven't taken a statistics class. All that matters i…
/r/TheRedPill03/04/15 05:46 AM
2

I understand that was a random sequence you pulled out of thin air, but it was god awful. Also, you kind of have it reversed. They are more likely to give a false positive (eg: Your biological brother is the true father) than negative.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/15 04:38 AM
5

You do realize they aren't mutually exclusive, right?
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 06:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter