TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Miclash013 Archive

View 2 posts and 75 comments by Miclash013 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Its dangerous because it allows for a toxic and destructive mindset to develop, which in turn helps destroy our society as we know it. So yes, it is dangerous to be wary and afraid of everyone of one sex because something a small percentage of them did. Yes, anyone could simply tell the police you raped them and you could be incarerated for life. Such is existance as a man. But there are also steps you can take to reduce the likelihood of it happening, like not having casual sex. Casual sex is o…
/r/MensRights24/09/22 06:09 PM
20

1: Recording will most likely get you convicted of something even if it's used to counteract a rape accusation. 2: Its dangerous to believe that all women are potential accusors, the same way its dangerous to believe all men are potential rapists. 3: The risk that comes with casual sex is that yes, a woman can just decide to fuck up your life. Its happened before, while still uncommon, and you need to be aware of it. But the best solution is to not have casual sex. Intimate sex with someone you …
/r/MensRights24/09/22 02:40 PM
6

They'll usually assume he's covering something up, and investigate the "issue" while persecuting him.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 02:18 PM
3

While I don't believe in any religion, (became an atheist a while ago) theres no reason you should denouce the people following a religion because said religion has a bad rep. This is blatantly racist, sexist, heterophobic, all the rest of the -ists.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 11:53 PM
1

I'm not doing it, but I don't care what others do in their free time. You want to be feminine, go ahead!
/r/MensRights11/09/22 02:13 PM
20

Im bisexual and a similar thing happens with me. I connect better with women usually, but in doing so I do feel like I'm missing something. When I hang out with other men it just feels "right." I don't know how to describe it.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 01:33 PM
-18

I agree with their point that when you ask for a paternity test, you are subconsiously investigating if they cheated. This is in situations where you are both committed in a relationship with no other evidence. But if he's already been suspicious, the relationship isn't committed, its a one night stand, etc., then yes, the man should be able to ask for a paternity test.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 11:41 PM
4

Remember, the next time someone attacks you for your race or sex, you can't be racist or sexist against the "oppressors!" You're obviously the problem, not them. /s
/r/MensRights22/08/22 08:30 PM
4

The argument that women are the only ones who have to be safe at night is so atrocious it makes me want to puke. Like, all people should be careful at night. Men die so much more than women in the street but everyone thinks men can just stroll like they own the city.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 02:52 AM
2

I was a feminist because from my limited view orchestrated by my parents all I saw was the corrupt feminist data and information online. And when I finally opened my eyes it was a calamity with how much arguing happened between my peers, parents, friends and I.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 07:32 AM
5

It's sad. The amount of comments telling him that getting off of social media is the solution is absurd. Men feel like punching bags in public too. I've heard people I thought were friends proudly say they hate ALL men. I've been refused jobs because I don't fill the diversity quota. The world is unfair to men no matter where you look. But telling people to "just avoid it" doesn't help and hurts because it just avoids the problem at hand entirely.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 05:16 PM
5

Yep and this is the only "woman bashing sub" on reddit. Canceled the other ones, so the incels like these joined here. Kinda fucked with the sub and made it actually appear woman hating.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 06:22 AM
3

Yes, I agree that Sex Work, which in the modern day includes only fans (its the same problem: selling a body for money), is naturally predatory and simulates connection in order to squeeze more profits out of those who need real connection. I don't believe we can criminalize or even should criminalize it. If women wish to give their bodies away, and men want to purchase them, then its a legal transaction. The only thing we can do is to tell fellow men to stop this addiction, and realize that the…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 01:33 AM
15

This subreddit, regardless of your opinion, will allow you to post anything concerning gender rights. Feminist subs will ban you for even commenting on some websites, and will ban anyone with a different opinion. Free speech is the difference. They say they allow everyone to have a voice on feminism, then censor anything that doesn't follow their ideals.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 10:26 PM
1

It isn't simping to have a civil discussion where you don't generalize an entire group.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 03:15 PM
0

If used with a condom (as it should at all times), the chance of sperm even entering the vagina is a little more than 1%. Add in the time frames of ovulation and birth control's cycle, it decreases dramatically. Telling a person who might die from birthing a child that they should've been more "sexually responsible" is bad, cruel even. And yes, everyone should be responsible sexually. But even in the best cases, pregnencies still can happen.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 03:11 PM
2

It is not a constitutional right. It is a basic human right that should be given freely to all women. And Americans should realize that not everything in the constitution is good, nor everything missing is bad.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 03:00 PM
1

Even if it absolves them of responsibility, it is still a right. Taking it away takes the ability to preserve one's well-being.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:53 PM
1

Because some people for some unbegotten reason have an ounce of sexual pleasure from the act. Or love the intimate connection with their significant other. I'm asexual so I'm not the foremost knowlege base for sexual relations. But if you believe that the only reason you have sex is to have a baby, there's a lot more you need to learn about the world before condemning another person's right to safety.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:45 PM
-2

The ability to save a mother's life from a potentially mortally dangerous birth is a right. The ability to not instantly become homeless because of the fees assosiated with birth is a right. The ability to not become a teen mom because of a lightning-strike chance that the birth control failed her is a right.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:35 PM
4

Of course women have more privleges than men. I never stated otherwise. But losing rights is never a good step in the right direction,
/r/MensRights04/07/22 01:00 AM
3

True, it is a step towards equality in the sense men do not have the right and they have had it removed.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 12:43 AM
11

Women losing privleges is not a step towards equality. No one should have their rights stripped away from them because of the public's opinion on their body.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 12:17 AM
1

But those who are pro-life choose to restrict others' use of abortions, correct? Your argument is that men chose to make this decicion indirectly, and yet woman are equally as pro-life.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:39 AM
3

Well obviously it wouldnt be different if women controlled society, because in Texas alone half the women were pro-life and half were pro-choice. So despite the fact that you claim all women would choose to make abortions acceptable the facts seem to disagree.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 09:48 AM
1

If I have a child, its better if they can have a functioning father in their life. And I know myself well enough that I know I probably will never be a good father. I can't even stand babysitting, alone having the little devils myself. But in the situation where I would leave the mother and child, I don't think my financial support will help any party. The child knows he has a deadbeat dad somewhere else that cashes a check once in a while, and the mother may begin to rely on that check.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:08 AM
-2

I agree. Just because you don't have a right doesn't mean you should then strip everyone else of their rights. If you support men having sexual autonomy, then you should support women's autonomy as well.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:20 PM
2

History has not been kind to the human race, even including sex job differences. Women had little to no independence while living a relatively cushy lifestyle for most of history, while men were conscripted and had to participate in the economy in exchange for their autonomy. Anyone would be insane to choose to be a man back then, especially when most jobs killed people daily. But in the modern era, not many of us are used to having no freedom.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 08:36 AM
4

While I believe that MensLib is primarily for the benefit of feminists, I disagree with your conclusion that like feminists, MensRights blame everything on the other sex. I very rarely even see a post where a person simply shits on women for the reason they weren't born with a dick. If they exist, they're downvoted but not neccesarily banned because we actually appreciate free speech in our space. But in the feminist-controlled spaces, the posts that simply whine about men's existance gets thous…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 08:31 AM
15

I was lured into feminism by a propoganda book my mother read to me weekly, which claimed that women deserve more than men currently because men had so much in the past. This book obviously is incredibly sexist, but is still available to be bought. I learned at a young age I am inferior because of my testicles, because I was born stronger I must act weaker for the sake of womenkind. I only got into Men's Rights and proper research because of a uncle-like figure that fought with my mother constan…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:28 AM
3

Hot take: No one should have any opinions on someones sexuality, as long as it isnt one that violates international law. If someone wants to be gay, go ahead, no one should be able to stop you. If a woman only feels fufilled by dating women, then they can go ahead. They already weren't going to date men.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 06:13 AM
17

If I didn't know anything about the two, I honestly have no clue who I would choose. Going off of straight numbers, I would save the man. Women spend more economically, while men pay more in taxes, and work more neccessary jobs. Its simply a question of who monetarily helps society better in this situation.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 06:21 AM
16

In that sub, if you make any statement that could be slightly different from the generalization the OP made, then you are downvoted to oblivion. Even if you're a woman who maybe isn't afraid for her life when walking home, or doesn't feel unsafe in a male dominated workplace.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 04:44 PM
2

I want to exist in a world where everyone has equality. EVERYONE. Men shouldn't have to deal with the bullshit allegations and exclusivity, and women shouldn't have to feel unsafe or feel unheard. But Mens Rights actually tries to view both sides and advocates for both, while Feminism is wholly one-sided. Right now I'm conducting a social experiment with the TwoXChromosomes sub, attempting to see if people there can forgive someone like me (a white male) for being born. Because of who I am I rep…
/r/MensRights29/05/22 02:53 AM
3

Of course my gripe is specifically only with the fact it advertises against cis men. And yes, while I agree that it probably is targeted for women who have suffered or are scared of being assaulted. But the problem I also have is that its selling point is perpetuating violence against men. Something along the lines of "protecting yourself against men" would be infinitely better than "how to injure cis men."
/r/MensRights27/05/22 02:43 PM
2

They can also just advertise then that its a self-defense course specifically targeting larger opponents? Instead of, you know, targeting a single group of people. Because that in the past has never really been a good thing...
/r/MensRights27/05/22 02:38 PM
1

I've been sexually harrassed and I'm a senior in high school. What a world we live in, eh?
/r/MensRights21/05/22 03:18 AM
6

Most men I know aren't even looking for a relationship, nor want one in the future. For a lot of people there are just a lot more things that are more important than a relationship.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 08:06 PM
31

No, because softball is quite literally discount baseball. Sexism would be you making fun of her for playing said sport, because its the only thing available to her.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 04:25 AM
10

In my state its been legal for a long while now. At this point, the only time we should be outraged is if they use this as an excuse to lock up creepers.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 03:52 PM
14

Without outside influence, I would not say men or women are more disrespectful. But in modern western society women are allowed more freedom to be disrespectful.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 06:55 PM
2

Its posted on mens rights because its one of the only places you can even question if something is truly not misogynistic without being banned. The analogy is essentially; its impressive if a man is able to be with a lot of women, but not if a woman essentially throws herself at men. I don't agree with it, but whatever.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 09:02 PM
1

We deal with the judge the same way we have dealt with other court cases where the judge is obviously man-hating: We don't. Theres nothing we can do in the current climate. And yes, I completely sympethize with alimony-paying fathers. I know how unfair the court is to them. But the court is the only judge we have in modern society so there isn't much we can do about it.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 09:44 PM
1

No, because if its a man-hating judge the issue is with the judge and as such should be dealt with. The problem is not the legal definition.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 08:09 PM
1

It makes sense because its what the definition is. No it doesn't make logical sense, but its how we make judgements in court.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 05:31 PM
1

Of course its wrong. But its the best we have right now and so it should be used.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 05:30 PM
3

Im saying that either way, whether you flip it or not, its a terrible line of reasoning and should be regarded as such. You don't call men or women "lucky" for bing raped.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 02:20 PM
1

good bot
/r/MensRights08/04/22 02:18 PM
12

Imagine saying the first paragraph, but flipping the sexes. He's handsome and 21. Is it really that difficult to think a 15 year old girl enjoyed this sexual encounter. Of course you wouldn't flip it, because it reveals how fucking disgusting that line of thinking is. No matter the sex, a minor is being taken advantage of by an adult. That is the heart of the issue. And at least in the USA, it is illegal at all times for people under legal age to have sex.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 06:27 AM
4

In that case yes, they are both legally raping one another and should be tried as such, obviously with the circumstances included its a different story. It all comes down to a judge and how they view it.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 06:24 AM
2

I mainly put that to rhyme and it has a nice ring to it. But I agree, the main problem is the brigading.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 02:39 AM
10

Like most subs, you have to pick through the trash to truly find what the sub is actually about. And deep down, I think this sub truly wants to make men have a better experience in life and to not be laid low by other movements. But there of course are the radicals, the trolls, the misguided souls. But at the heart we all want something better for men. The important question we all want answered is "how?"
/r/MensRights30/03/22 10:37 PM
9

This is genuinely a brilliant piece of writing, and should honestly be pinned to the top of the subreddit. But all of your points are sound and equally depressing. It's going to be ridiculously hard to actually achieve equality. But here's to trying to make a better world for men and women.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 05:18 PM
2

I am not planning on college because I'm pursuing a career where college is basically useless if you already know stuff, and isn't needed for almost if not all of its careers.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 11:57 PM
12

I love how there's no sources, no evidence, just "society" and "past descrimination"
/r/MensRights21/03/22 02:02 PM
3

Its Pixar somehow creating the most quirky movie they've ever created. But I actually enjoyed it past the 13 year old nonsence
/r/MensRights15/03/22 12:47 AM
21

Keyword "reserve." AKA they only are called upon if everyone in their army is dead or close to it. And they still aren't forced to stay, that prize is still kept by men.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 02:18 AM
19

I mean personally I think being able to run away is much luckier than having to deal with the horrors of war
/r/MensRights12/03/22 01:24 AM
32

Ahh yes because being stuck in your home while cities are being bombed is so much better than having to go through immigration. Women are reserves only, Aka when the amount of men they have fighting runs out. And yes we all realize everyone is being killed, but this document completely ignores who is actually taking the brunt of the Ukraine-Russia conflict, the men required to stay home.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 01:23 AM
220

Of course women and children make up the majority people leaving. Men can't leave unless they aren't able bodied.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 07:24 PM
2

Pregnancies will abound.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 01:35 PM
0

And thats something most people will not experience. So believe what you want to believe and advocate for, using your own experiences because they are unique to you.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 02:08 PM
0

I wouldn't say its a problem or wrong to want this, no. But realize that theres other peoples views, which for most of them can only be of the statistics and news from a country. Many people cant experience first hand misogynism like you have, but also know that in law men can't even be raped by a woman. So forgive online people for only knowing some of the facts.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 02:05 PM
1

I always go by the idea that whoever is organizing the meetup should be paying the majority of the cost. So when I ask people out on dates I usually just expect them to maybe pay the tip.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 06:17 PM
4

Sir this is a Wendy's. But seriously, this is a bunch of nonsense. People can't even agree if a hotdog is a sandwhich. How do you expect people to accept that Christian faith dictates your gender?
/r/MensRights20/12/21 04:26 PM
6

1. Men's problems cant be solved because gender based discrimination, like all discrimination, will never go away. We can only try to compensate. 2. Feminism supports gender supremecy by ignoring science and data that supports men and women actually being incredibly equal in parts of the world. An example would be the pay gap, which has been debunked and debunked countless times. They also shut down Men's rights conferences by protesting in front of the site. They ignore that women get children …
/r/MensRights16/12/21 06:35 AM
4

The problem is, we can't solve this. We will never be equal, whether racially, economically or sexually. We are "obsessed" with Feminism because 3rd wave feminism promotes the exact opposite of what we want, which is gender supremecy. Of course we talk about them a whole lot, they are the direct opposites to our movement. And its hard to "admit" that we have to take down patriartrical institutions when women have the exact same rights (and sometimes more) as men, and women make up more than 50% …
/r/MensRights16/12/21 06:23 AM
1

I'd say a daughter not because of serious reasons as other people have, I just have a lot more baby names for a daughter. And also growing up in a household of only boys Id enjoy a bigger change in family organization.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 06:50 AM
1

They talk about the matriarchy being a utopian view on the world, with complete equality just because women are in power. Yeah, just because matriarchies worked in the past doesn't mean they were good.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 04:47 AM
3

Honestly this is very funny if its satire. After all, even my name is typically a female name noadays.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 04:10 AM
-2

While I agree with women probably needing to be excluded from military drafting, its for another reason. Whats the easiest way to dodge the draft? Be unfit for duty. And the easiest way to do that on-demand as a woman? Get pregnant. We'd have a baby boom occur if the draft were enacted, which is not something we need as a country.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 03:53 AM
4

Same. Reddit is incredibly feminist bias, and thats incredibly well known. Wouldnt be surprised if they actually excluded male rights.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 06:30 AM
1

No, its an earnings gap, AKA men choose to work higher paying jobs, work longer hours, and stay in careers longer. The pay gap was created ignoring every single variable, only taking the average man's wage and the average woman's wage.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 06:29 AM
13

We appreciate it, its honestly just more sad than anything how much we humans can't get along.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 06:51 AM
1

I would consider myself anti-feminist because the movement honestly is so flawed. They say they're helping everyone but there is no evidence they are actually helping men.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 01:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter