TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MicrowaveSpace Archive

View 0 posts and 102 comments by MicrowaveSpace on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Honey you need to get off your algorithm.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 02:18 AM
–

No, they claimed birth rates have been variable across time based on cost of living. That’s patently false. They have been predictably falling since the end of the baby boom in the 1960s.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 03:57 PM
–

Do you have any idea when birth rates started to drop???
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 03:56 PM
–

This is made up nonsense. I challenge you to provide one single source for your claim. The birth rate hasn’t been that variable over time and in fact it is when countries start to become WEALTHIER (per capita, mind you) that their birth rates start to drop.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 03:15 PM
4

That’s a bingo.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 10:42 PM
19

You definitely have a point re: partisanship but showing off someone’s nudes non consensually to congress and the public is really gross and I tend to believe that most people regardless of political party are against that. Revenge porn laws exist for a reason and are often bipartisan.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 03:21 AM
–

That’s a bingo
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 04:36 PM
0

That’s a weird definition of courage. The only time you need to have courage is when there is danger of a downside. If there’s no possible downside to your behavior, then there is no reason to have to be brave enough to face it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 11:57 PM
1

Hypocrite lmao. More like literate
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 11:46 PM
2

An Uber driver cannot take your kid to the dentist!!! What fucking dentist takes an unaccompanied minor with no parent present?!? Are you from planet earth? How old are you?!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 10:30 PM
2

Saying that taking a kid to a doctor or a dentist is not an application of love and care for that child and doing the best by them is so absolutely batshit it is not even on this planet. It’s literally one of the most basic, foundational parts of being a parent. Bro can make whatever stupid ass argument he makes about men being better parents than women (absolutely divorced from reality both his points and yours) but trying to exemplify that argument by using taking them to the dentist is so nex…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 10:23 PM
1

”I see women doing these mindless, zero care things for their kids all the time, like taking them to the dentist”
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 09:10 PM
6

No they can’t. You don’t put your little kid in an Uber and send them to the doctor or the dentist by themselves. That’s literally insane. And it’s not something you do because it’s on a list, it’s something you do because it’s important for their health, both at the moment and in the future. People who are unfortunate enough to grow up with parents who don’t bother taking care of their health and dental hygiene have serious issues with them as an adult. Going to the dentist is as much a part of…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 07:06 PM
-1

Literally not. Learn the meaning of words. He literally called taking your kids to the dentist mindless and zero care.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 06:56 PM
20

Are you seriously saying that taking your child to the dentist is mindless and pointless?! Lmao. Yeah forget dental hygiene, knowing how high to push your kid on the swing is way more important!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 03:27 PM
2

If you want to know what society would look like without women, all you have to do is look to the Wild West, where every landmark is named after a different violent incident. “Bucket of blood street” “purgatory” “bloody tanks wash”. It wasn’t until women and churches finally started moving in that the murder rate finally started settling down and law and order finally commenced.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 02:40 PM
–

People with low functioning autism have much more pressing problems than finding romantic relationships. They can’t even live independently, much less make fortunes.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 06:31 PM
1

Lmao okay buddy
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 11:31 PM
–

Did you read my comment? I said that women prefer tall men for evolutionary reasons, one of those being that they are more fit. One factor in that is men who have better nutrition in childhood are taller. This is much more important throughout time than now, when most people have access to plenty of calories. There is literally nothing that you can say that would disprove that. I would LOVE for you to prove me wrong but alas you cannot. Even today tall men make more money than short men do. And …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 11:12 PM
1

Is this not the the purple pill debate subreddit? If your argument is that people should be more romantic than our evolutionary history guides us to be then you may be in the wrong place.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 11:11 PM
–

Superficiality means nothing up against genetic preferences. Evolution is king. For some species, such as peacocks and many other species of birds, evolution has selected for males to have obviously detrimental traits such as huge plumage that is metabolically costly. But that’s what the females choose. There’s lots of evidence that height provides advantages to offspring including both fitness and resources. But even if it was a superficial preference, it obviously has a long history in our evo…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 11:09 PM
–

There is obviously a genetic component to height. I would never argue against that fact. But there is also, very obviously, and very scientifically proven, a nutritional component to height as well. A 2 second google search proves this easily. One quick resource for you since you don’t know how to google for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 10:58 PM
–

There have been plenty of short men all throughout the 200,000 years of human history that have successfully found mates. It’s not necessary to get limb lengthening surgery. All I’m saying is that, on average, women are more attracted to taller males for evolutionary reasons. Plenty of ugly, short, poor, whatever people have successfully mated and married. They just weren’t high value.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 10:41 PM
–

This is not true at all. Latin immigrants to the US are on average like 4-6 inches shorter than their offspring. It is very well established that childhood nutrition has a HUGE effect on adult height.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 10:36 PM
–

They don’t contradict each other though. Women look for high value mates. Value comes in a variety of forms. Height adds to value because taller males have more resources and they are more physically able to provide for their mates and defend against opponents. If a man is short but he has high status then he has the resources to be able to provide for and defend his mate. Think of it as a complex algebraic equation. Height is merely one component.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 10:35 PM
–

Well, I would argue a lot of women don’t lie about that fact. This is made clear by many women putting height preferences directly in their tinder profiles. Some women do say that, and maybe they are more influenced by social factors telling them that it doesn’t matter. Or maybe they are lying to make themselves look good. None of it is really mystifying.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 10:33 PM
–

That doesn’t make a difference at all. Society can tell you that obese women are still attractive but has it made a difference in your opinion? No, it obviously has not. Women prefer tall men because they, on a long term evolutionary time scale (including today) are 1. more fit and 2. are able to provide more resources. That basically sums up everything women look for in mates.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 10:28 PM
–

Because height isn’t the only factor in male attractiveness. Resources and status have a huge influence as well. This is really basic stuff my guy
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 10:26 PM
–

Thread over
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 10:24 PM
–

Well, throughout history there have been many times that men preferred plump, not obese, women. Obesity comes with myriad health issues and has never been preferred by either gender. Preference for taller men is basically cross-cultural which shows that it is more of an inherent preference than a social one.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 10:15 PM
–

I’m not ignoring culture, I specifically mentioned a social component. That doesn’t negate the fact that there is a genetic component as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 10:14 PM
–

Also not only is height genetic but also environmental. People with better childhood nutrition grow up to be significantly taller, this is well established fact. So it makes a lot of sense for women to prefer taller men in this sense, it shows better nutrition and health throughout their lifespan.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 09:44 PM
–

At the end of the day, both are preferences for sex differences that have been selected for through the evolutionary process. You can try to rationalize or justify for them or to make them go away but that doesn’t take away the fact that there is some social component to attractiveness but a much larger component that is inherently genetic that people don’t really have conscious control over. One “seeming” more justified than the other to you doesn’t change that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 09:42 PM
–

This is like saying “as a woman I honestly can’t see what’s unattractive about fat women” or “as a woman I can’t see why a woman with an hourglass figure and small waist is seen as especially attractive” it’s a genetically engrained preference. It is what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 09:24 PM
4

Yeah it’s very obvious that there are a lot of men out there that would prefer women to be subjugated and completely dependent on men to survive.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 06:31 PM
9

If you’re talking about random violence, sure, but the vast majority of violent crimes against women are committed by their partners. Having a husband around doesn’t protect against violent crimes when he’s the one doing the violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 10:30 PM
1

Nobody says stereotypes don’t affect men “because patriarchy”. You are making shit up. They might be saying something along the lines of that men are the ones perpetuating these own stereotypes and ideals on themselves, because the video games are designed by men for men with the male gaze and male desires in mind. Which would be true, because when you look at games targeted towards women they look completely different. But that’s not the same thing as saying “shut up, female sexuality is positi…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/23 02:59 AM
-1

Cool, good for you. Advocate for what you care about. But don’t make shit up. Nobody is telling men to shut up for advocating for more realistic portrayals in media or video games. That doesn’t happen. Your victimhood narrative is completely in your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/23 02:47 AM
1

I don’t give a single flying fuck how men or women are portrayed in video games. So whatever lens you think I’m viewing this through, you are wrong. I was responding to the commenter above me who was claiming that men who advocate for more realistic depictions of male characters in video games get shouted down and told to shut up because male sexuality is evil and female sexuality is good. That doesn’t happen because men do not care how unrealistically jacked their video game characters are and …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/23 01:34 AM
5

No they are not. That doesn’t happen at all, ever, your victim complex is making that up. Provide a single example of that ever happening. Men actually don’t GAF how jacked male video game characters are, if anything they prefer it for the fantasy element. They only time they bring up “unrealistic standards” in male video game or movie characters is in response to women bringing up their issues with it in regards to female characters first.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/23 12:04 AM
1

Agree to disagree then. Look man I am a person who is actually very open to being approached by strangers and I have given my number out that way more than once. But this guy went about it completely wrong and gave off bad vibes from the start. Even if he didn’t try hitting on someone who is apparently terrified of other human beings it still wouldn’t have worked. And sticking around and trying to engage with someone who is obviously scared of you is creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/23 12:52 PM
1

Haha I just like provoking people for fun dude super cool lol and that’s why other people are childish and not me hahahaha lol
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 10:50 PM
1

And the mask comes off. Just because you’re an absolute moron who hates women doesn’t mean I think every man is. Again yawn you’re so fucking boring
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 10:47 PM
1

🥱
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 10:43 PM
1

🥱
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 10:40 PM
1

🥱
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 10:34 PM
1

Okay? So she obviously has social anxiety. Unfortunately increasingly common especially in young people, both male and female. At any rate, that made it even more obvious that she absolutely did not want to talk to him which makes it even worse that he tried for so long. He never should have even hit on her on the first place when she was busy doing something. It’s like coworkers talking to you when you have headphones in and are clearly working on something. And she even explicitly said that sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 10:34 PM
1

No dude social anxiety isn’t creepy, you can’t just use words to mean things that they obviously don’t mean. You are so boring to talk to. Have fun in whatever lala land you live in
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 10:28 PM
1

Being creepy is significantly worse than being socially anxious. I don’t understand why, in a thread that is clearly about whether the guy is creepy or not, you insist on making the conversation about what the woman did wrong. You don’t “hold someone accountable” for social anxiety dude, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 10:20 PM
1

Holding her accountable for what, exactly? Also her body language was mot at all subtle. You are weird man. It’s the people who don’t pick up subtlety and social cues that make people the most uncomfortable and can be quite frankly frightening to confront. As an extreme example just take a person who is approached by someone who appears to be homeless and mentally ill. People in that situation don’t think to themselves, oh this person clearly can’t read the nonverbal communication I am giving th…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 10:10 PM
1

You are railing against human nature just to find any excuse to blame the girl here. People give noncommittal answers all the time, like I said. It isn’t about one person or another being “incapable of being direct” because pretty much everyone does it sometimes. That’s never going to change.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 10:00 PM
1

Seriously let’s lay this out. She was busy on her phone, yet he still interrupted her. Huge mistake from the get go. She was obviously nervous and uncomfortable around him but he sat down anyways. She explicitly said she didn’t mean he could sit next to her. She could not have made it more clear she did not want to engage with him. Socially awkward girl or not the guy completely disregarded every single cue both implicit and explicit that he should not have been doing what he was doing. Thus the…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 09:54 PM
1

Just absolutely disagree with everything you’ve said. People give noncommittal answers rather than rejections out of social nicety and not wanting to hurt someone’s feelings. They do it to their friends, family, coworkers, and strangers. It literally happens all the time. It’s not a social anxiety thing, it’s a not wanting to make others feel negatively thing. And yeah, it is a lot easier to empathize with someone who cares about the other person’s feelings than with someone who doesn’t. If he i…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 09:51 PM
1

A lot of people give noncommittal answers when they really mean no, that’s just a general human thing. Acting like that’s a social failing rather than a common social nicety is dumb. She clearly has some social anxiety that she needs to work on but that doesn’t make his behavior any less creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 09:38 PM
1

If someone is unable to pick up on social cues as obvious as the ones she is giving off in the video, they should be working on their social skills in general, not trying to cold approach random women in public. Like that’s a serious life hindrance right there.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 09:21 PM
2

That’s just not true. People make small talk with strangers they are uninterested in all the time and it’s not inherently uncomfortable. Now if you randomly approach someone and it’s immediately clear that you are hitting on them then yeah that’s going to be uncomfortable most of the time unless you’re like 10/10. But for normal people you make an innocuous small talk-y comment, gauge if they are open to talking to you or not, and go from there. If they’re acting closed off then don’t try to tal…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 09:17 PM
1

I didn’t shame anyone, all I did was disagree with you that his behavior was normal. He was obviously making the girl uncomfortable, it is clear as day in the video. Continuing to try to pursue someone despite making them uncomfortable is not normal it is creepy. It’s like the very definition of creepy. And this is coming from someone who is open to cold approaches and has given my number out to strangers before. If you’re going to try and cold approach you have to have an understanding of body …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 09:05 PM
1

He was not normal
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 05:25 PM
1

Also what the fuck are you on about with “you felt it less than they did” yeah so what? Empathy isn’t about experiencing the emotions of another person with the same exact intensity as them? Do you even know what empathy is?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 09:12 PM
1

Oh fuck off. You literally said “you can only really have empathy for someone in a situation when you've been put in that experience yourself, so likely no, but how could you expect him to?” You did NOT say lived experience ”modulates” empathy. Two completely different arguments there buddy
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 09:11 PM
1

No you are not. People have varied experiences in life but literally everyone has experienced happiness, joy, irritation, discomfort, disgust, loss, etc etc. That’s more than enough to be able to extrapolate to most situations. You may not have ever been hit on by a creepy older adult as a child but it’s not hard to rub two brain cells together to realize that that child is probably scared and uncomfortable and confused. You know what it is like to feel scared and uncomfortable and confused so n…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:52 PM
3

No it isn’t? Sure for a literal child with next to zero life experience, maybe. But any mentally healthy functional adult does NOT need similar prior experience to experience empathy. The fact that you think they do is shocking and speaks really poorly of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:34 PM
3

Using your imagination. You do not have to have been in a similar experience to understand how a person might be feeling. If that’s the only way your empathy functions then you have a serious problem
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 08:30 PM
5

That is not at all how empathy works. In fact if you can only feel empathy for someone in a situation you have previously experienced then you are severely, maladaptively lacking empathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 07:54 PM
-1

Read the fucking Wikipedia article you twit. Or don’t, just go ahead and base your beliefs on whatever the fuck you want
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/23 03:34 PM
–

There’s plenty more articles about it if you would just look it up. Just check the Wikipedia article for Pete’s sake: Notable invocations of the concept include during the 1852 evacuation of the Royal Navy troopship HMS Birkenhead[4] and most famously during the 1912 sinking of RMS Titanic. Despite its prominence in the popular imagination, the doctrine was unevenly applied.[3][5] The use of "women and children first" during the Birkenhead evacuation was a "celebrated exception", used to establi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/23 03:24 PM
–

Women and children first is a myth. They did it on the titanic but studies have shown that women actually had a lower survival rate on ships than men did. Source.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/23 02:52 PM
–

Unironically arguing that women shouldn’t have autonomy 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/23 07:48 PM
1

War and murder, killing for self-defense and even just reasons of passion were the norm throughout human history. It’s our modern sensibility of holding such a high value on human life that is unusual. It’s great that social mores have changed such that killing another person is seen as so abhorrent that it’s emotionally damaging, but make no mistake in thinking that was the case for people throughout history or that it is well outside the psychological norm for humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 07:22 PM
1

Seriously. I love men!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 08:42 PM
2

If you agree the idea is trash then it’s even more ridiculous to argue that having people and/or the government spend money to enforce it is reasonable…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 02:03 PM
2

Waste of fucking government money to regularly pay for dexa scans for every married adult simply to enforce a “no getting fat” marriage clause. Like do you guys even hear yourselves?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 01:54 PM
5

You are able to leave with the current system.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 01:35 PM
2

The average American doesn’t even have an extra $1000 to deal with an emergency. How do you think it’s reasonable to add this unnecessary monthly/yearly expense as a requirement for marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 01:25 PM
7

Probably because something like 70% of adult Americans are overweight or obese so it’s clearly not a reasonable stipulation for the vast majority of people. Unless you think only the 30% of normal weight people should be allowed to get/stay married?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 01:12 PM
1

😂😂😂 dude you are like THE caricature of a Reddit keyboard warrior. Get your panties out of a twist!!!! That guy commented with an anecdote about his friends’ success and said they were solid 7s. You immediately said that meant they were actually 8s and therefore top 5% looks-wise. That’s not an educated guess my man that is making shit up. Maybe you need a little bit more of that science education you high IQ stud, you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/21 04:52 PM
0

Bro…. You don’t just get to make numbers up and insist they’re correct just because they feel right to you. And you definitely DON’T mention your IQ on Reddit EVER if you want people to take you seriously. Lmaoo
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/21 04:10 PM
2

Yeah, photoshopping lol
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 04:06 PM
1

In the case of these comments, it appears there is. The vast majority of the top level commenters said some variety of "no."
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 10:41 PM
3

Umm pardon me? Lol. I answered your question directly and concisely and you have a problem with that why exactly? Women compliment men for both friendly and romantic reasons. The information which conveys their motivations can largely be found in their nonverbal communications rather than the compliment itself. Sorry you're not socially literate enough to understand that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 10:12 PM
3

Nah. I compliment a guy if I feel like complimenting him. Just yesterday I complimented the valet's glasses; they looked good on him. It's an easy way to have a quick positive interaction with someone and make a dude's day. If I want to hit on a guy, I'll hit on him. Whether that includes a compliment or not is largely irrelevant. As a woman making moves on a man it has much more to do with nonverbal communication (eye contact, tone of voice/inflection, body language etc) rather than the actual …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 09:30 PM
2

I honestly don't believe that you are even real right now. Your victim complex is suffocating me. THE MEDIA ONLY REPORTS ON THOSE TOPICS WHICH BRING THEM VIEWS AND ADVERTISING DOLLARS. CONTROVERSIAL TOPICS SUCH AS FALSE RAPE ALLEGATIONS BRING TONS OF VIEWS AND DISCUSSIONS SO THE MEDIA REPORTS ON THEM AS MUCH AS THEY CAN. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH PRIVILEGE AND EVERYTHING TO DO WITH MONEY.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 11:35 PM
3

I'm not shaming you, jackass. The phenomenon I talked about is widespread throughout the media and it applies to controversial topics of all kinds. Example: black lives matter and the deaths they protest - the protests that get the most coverage are the ones here the victim was committing some crime such that the anti-BLM folks say that they deserved the police reaction. Another example - practically anything Donald Trump has to say. He is an incredibly polarizing figure and this is why the medi…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 11:28 PM
5

Lol so if you're not interested in having an intelligent and reasonable discussion, why are you here again?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 11:19 PM
7

I think you need to spend some more time reading and observing the world around you. Your comments read very much like you are lost in your own experiences and perceptions and it makes me doubt your ability to view things from perspectives other than your own. For example, you state that because plates are getting sex than they are in a far more favorable position than orbiters. That is only true if you are evaluating their respective situations from a male perspective. I suggest that both plate…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 06:02 PM
8

There is a commonly-held perception (not just by RP) that women often use poor judgment when it comes to partner selection. What they see as a "high value partner" may not be objectively true, as they might consider a high-IQ nerd as far less attractive than a low-IQ jock or "bad boy." It's a common trope that "chicks dig jerks," and this is confirmed by the statistics related to domestic violence, rape, and other crimes against women. I've got to take issue with your use of "objectively" here. …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 03:15 PM
5

So you're falling victim to one of the consequences of Internet outrage and the function of advertising $$$ here. Basically, the reason "every major rape case" in the media appears to have been a false allegation is that the very reason they are "major" in the first place is because they are controversial. For very obvious, cut and dry cases, even people on opposing "sides" will agree and no one will be particularly interested in reading about or sharing that article. So those never even come up…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 02:23 PM
10

I consider myself more purple than red but I'll take a shot. As generalizations, I do think most RP theories have some degree of truth to them. Hypergamy, branch swinging, the idea of frame... These are all tendencies I can see in myself and the world around me. However where I think TRP goes wrong is where they turn these generalizations into laws as well as over applying them and selectively applying them to women. The most blatant example is "hamstering," which I have REPEATEDLY seen referred…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 01:21 PM
20

That pic is fucking terrible. It's not that you're "fucking ugly" it's that the picture is taken in shit lighting using a dirty mirror and you have no discernible expression on your face. What do you think that says about you?
/r/askTRP21/12/15 02:33 AM
8

If women are repeatedly telling you that they find you frightening, you're probably doing something to come off that way. That's not a normal thing women say unless they mean it. That is to say, I don't think there's any agenda behind it. And if it's coming from multiple women, well that's a pattern.
/r/askTRP20/02/14 07:57 AM
5

You realize that's a joke, right?
/r/TheRedPill15/01/14 05:50 PM
1

Jesus you're dense. They think they can get through with a simple "hi" BECAUSE THEY CAN. It didn't work with OP but it obviously works with enough guys that they have no incentive to put in more effort.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/13 09:02 PM
5

If you yourself are something valuable that they want to hold on to, they will make the effort to bring enough to the table to keep you around. That is RP theory, not that women are useless for everything but sex. Low-value individuals attract low-value partners. Make yourself as high value as possible and you'll start seeing the quality of women that you want.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/13 08:55 PM
10

No, that's not what I'm saying at all. These women could be interesting and intelligent, or not. But the bottom line is that humans are lazy creatures and if they can get what they want by putting in minimal effort, they won't go out of their way to put in more effort than is needed. This is a human universal that applies to men just as much as women.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/13 08:46 PM
14

Dude, they're not putting in any more effort into their messages because they don't have to. Their profile picture is enough to get what they want with no additional effort... if yours was, too, you'd be doing the same thing.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/13 08:39 PM
1

Digit ratio is affected by prenatal exposure to testosterone and estrogen. Prenatal androgen exposure has been shown to increase the frequency of 'male-like' behavior in female rats (Source). We don't have the same experimental evidence in humans but we do have studies that have shown an association between low digit ratio (prenatal androgen exposure) to 'masculine' traits. It doesn't change anybody's gender, it may affect their personality and behaviors. That's all. I'm a woman with a twin brot…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/13 08:06 PM
0

It's obviously used as the explanation but when you've got evo psych and rp theory in mind you can't exactly call your own observations empirical. Anecdotal observations are just way too vulnerable to the expectancy bias to be considered legitimate empirical evidence.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/13 07:37 PM
1

I'm sorry I just can't agree with that. An imaginary, perfect version of this subreddit may be based solely on empirical observation but as it is, evo psych permeates the posts and theory pretty thoroughly.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/13 07:23 PM
4

I don't understand, how is this bluepill? It's talking about evo psych, which is essentially the entire foundation of this subreddit. The article says straight up that women go to betas for security/see them as husband material and even touches on hypergamy: "Evolution makes women leave you" (re: when they feel they don't need the security betas provide so they can go back to alphas). There's a lot of unscientific, bluepill info out there but I don't this this article really qualifies.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/13 06:21 PM
15

Dude how the hell is this hamstering? She says straight up that her skinny bf is too beta for her and that she thinks she can do better. It's obvious hypergamy but you have to give it to her that she's self aware about it.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/13 05:39 PM
7

It actually works even if you've had it before because there are so many strains; the chances are you haven't had at least 1 of the 4 strains that it protects from, if not more. So it looks like a beneficial vaccine for almost every sexually active young person.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 01:54 AM
2

Y chromosomes do not have necessary metabolic functions or else women wouldn't be able to survive. Y chromosomes do have the SRY gene which results in the formation of the testes, along with other genes that have to do with gender differences (largely neural and hormonal) but again it's not accurate to say that any of those genes are necessary for metabolic function. Additionally your statement about X inactivation is incomplete... both X chromosomes are active within an XX individual but there …
/r/MensRights03/12/12 08:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter