TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MidSolo Archive

View 6 posts and 105 comments by MidSolo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

The whole point of this video is to show how flawed Sarkeesan's logic is. Whedon isnt sexist, just how video games aren't sexist. Writing sexist characters doesn't make you sexist, but Sarkeesan would make us think so.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 08:25 PM
-2

At least I've provided sources. You just keep on talking about "this source" and "that source". How about some actual peer-reviewed medical or scientific documents?
/r/MensRights12/01/14 10:03 PM
-1

the foreskin more receptive than the glans Yeah I'd like to see some source on that.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 09:48 PM
-3

"Circumcision is probably the world's most widely performed procedure. Approximately one-third of males worldwide are circumcised, most often for reasons other than medical indication." Male genital mutilation is, by and large, mostly done on the foreskin. While female genital mutilation is, by and large, mostly done on the clitoris. So yeah, I think it does qualify as more severe, since the clitoris is akin to the glans. It isn't a blanket statement, I've looked at the numbers, have you? Here i…
/r/MensRights12/01/14 09:15 PM
-3

Including, but not limited to, fucking them with a knife. I'm not even joking. I did an investigation and essay on the differences in justification and procedures for male and female genital mutilation. While I am completely against both, I do have to say that female genital mutilation around the world is a LOT worse than male genital mutilation. And while female genital mutilation has been proven to be completely ineffective at doing jack shit, there are situations (like where there is little t…
/r/MensRights12/01/14 08:08 PM
1

Hijaking for source of image. Choose 'Rude Boy' from the drop-down menu. By the way, this is what a Rude Boy is.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 07:19 AM
6

Whelp, that's enough internet for today a week.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 11:39 PM
31

/r/mensrights has to be the most sarcasm-filled subreddit I know of.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 09:30 PM
2

I'm about to blow your mind.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 04:23 AM
4

While I understand your point, some people want to be scared, not disgusted. There is a difference.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 08:41 PM
52

Science mods just wanted them to shut up.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 11:15 PM
2

Does punching a wall in anger and frustration count as self-harm? Because a grand majority of men I know have done that a few times in their life, myself included.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 02:20 PM
1

Don't you know? Strong independent women need donations.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 10:48 AM
4

All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others
/r/MensRights14/09/13 08:40 AM
27

Get a fucking job you freeloading bitch.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 11:08 AM
16

FIXED
/r/MensRights21/07/13 12:07 AM
4

As a graphic designer, the video was physically painful to watch.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 04:46 AM
-1

You can be as emotional as you want, just keep your discussion logical, because if not it's not worth a damn.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 11:35 PM
1

so who gets to determine when the danger is sufficient enough to warrant self defense A team of qualified physicians will diagnose, and if they think there is no real threat, then an abortion is ruled out. If the team of doctors considers the pregnancy to be dangerous, then an abortion should not only be considered, but be recommended.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 10:30 PM
1

So is a quadraplegic no longer a human being?
/r/MensRights16/07/13 10:26 PM
1

You literally just hit rock bottom
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:41 PM
1

Everyone knows it is personal to them. But they should maintain a rational point of view. "Taking it personally" means that they are already emotionally invested, or in other words, they are basing their point of view on emotions, not reality.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:38 PM
2

coming from an MRA Ad Hominem. Here are my facts.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:35 PM
2

Who said being sentient was a requisite for being a host to a parasite? A parasite can feed off a system without giving anything useful back to the system. The system doesn't have to be alive.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:34 PM
2

You are assuming that all organism are living beings. There are social systems considered organisms, like the judicial system, the economic system, etc. And I know you understand what I mean by stating that a person can be a parasite to the earth, as a system. Stop acting dumb.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:30 PM
2

Yes, transgenic animals are human, but only a small portion of them. The grand majority of them is animal. A fetus, by contrast, is 100% human, because all of it's DNA came from human gametes.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:14 PM
2

Incorrect. 'Person' is a legal term. 'Human being' is a philosophical term. A 'human being' is a human in the process of being. A human that is. A human that continues to be. Also, stop downvoting. We are having a discussion here.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:06 PM
5

I am simply demonstrating how the feminism subreddit, one of the largest feminist "forums" (in quotes because a forum is place for discourse, not circle-jerking), does not allow someone to present a fact-based argument if it contradicts what they believe in. I was adding to the bulk of eivdence that /r/feminism is feelings-based and not fact-based.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:04 PM
3

Exactly. Why don't you try countering my argument using logic, instead of using "the law"? The law can make mistakes because sometimes when it is made the writers of the law don't take into account all possible outcomes, you know?
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:01 PM
3

The law is correct because that's the law. Do you see a problem here with circular logic?
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:59 PM
2

Wrong. Here is why. The life of the fetus and the life of the mother have equal value. But at the moment when the fetus presents a danger to the mother, the mother has the right of Self Defense, just like she has against any other person who poses a threat to her immediate safety.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:58 PM
4

You are on the second to lowest tier. Please try again
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:52 PM
11

DEY TERK ER PREVLERGE
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:48 PM
8

No true Scotsman fallacy. if "/r/feminism", the largest feminist online community, is not a true indicator of what current popular feminism is, then I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:27 PM
1

Thank you, I just replaced it with a screenshot of my post.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:25 PM
4

A fetus is just like any other human being that requires nourishment from it's surroundings. Or do you live off your existence alone? No, you require food, air, interaction. By your definition, you are a parasite of this planet. All human beings require their surroundings, and if they took away yours, you too would die soon.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:23 PM
1

Just like the father can renouce his fatherhood, so can the mother, by placing the child for adoption. But 'terminating' a pregnancy is ending a human being's life.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:58 PM
14

Their rules are basically: "Say what we like or you get banned" Why even have a forum at all, then? Why discuss? To pat each other on the back? Is feminism a circlejerk?
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:54 PM
10

Abortion is a womens rights issue Abortion is a HUMAN RIGHTS issue. A fetus is a human being, not a human organ. As men, and as humans, we have the right to opinion in the topic of abortion.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:23 PM
14

That feminism is silencing men from having an opinion. Men have a right to an opinion, specially if it is about their children.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:02 PM
-7

Here is the post in which I try to, from a factual and science-based point of view, analyze if a zygote/fetus/baby is a human being. Womyns don't facts.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 06:56 PM
2

Please let us know what she responds. This looks like a good project but we have to know what she really stands for.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 06:52 PM
19

It already happened, and there was MASSIVE backlash. Dr. Pepper tried it with their "not for women" adds for Dr. Pepper 20, which was actually tamer than outright calling one sex superior to another.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 03:08 PM
7

What if apart from recognizing the plight women face, we could also recognize that men also face discrimination due to the disproportionate amount of attention we give women?
/r/MensRights01/07/13 08:59 AM
2

Yeah I do agree that I am misinformed. I can easily grasp what misanthropy is about, but humanism seems like it includes so many topics and has such a broad historical background that there is no easy way to understand it. But does it have a place in that question of the survey?
/r/MensRights21/06/13 06:29 AM
2

Hmm see that's something I was thinking about. I consider myself both a Humanist and an Egalitarian. So what would I respond? I feel like separating the two causes unnecessary dilution. Maybe Humanist shouldn't be included in the survey, I think we should just take it for granted. What's the other option if you aren't a Humanist, a Misanthrope?
/r/MensRights20/06/13 07:24 AM
6

I have a question: What is the difference between Egalitarianism and Humanism?
/r/MensRights20/06/13 05:57 AM
1

As someone who suffers from real ADHD, I can accurately say that you have no idea what you are talking about. ADHD is over-diagnosed, and that is part of the problem, but the drug is designed to treat kids (and people) with a specific serious disorder. It is not the drug's problem that is is also given to regular kids who are just a little overly-energetic. The problem lies in ignorant parents and greedy psychiatrists. I can tell you this: I would not have made it out of highschool without the h…
/r/MensRights18/06/13 06:18 AM
-3

Docile is not the right word to use. These meds give the kids the ability to concentrate. They want to get good grades and follow directions, they aren't little anarchists. And if they were, these meds would not change that. The kids these meds are prescribed for simply get distracted too easily and can't concentrate. The meds don't magically turn them into little servant that do what they are told, they simply allow them to calm their minds and work on what they want to.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 10:51 AM
13

Boys become men.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 10:43 AM
13

It's like he says: "There are tens of millions, if not billions, of dollars at stake. So what are you waiting for, what's your excuse? Do you hate money?" If you think the market for females is that lucrative, then by all means go ahead and make a game for girls. Reap in the cash. "Game developers are going to keep making games like these because this is what men are buying."
/r/MensRights07/06/13 01:24 AM
-2

True Anarchy is impossible. People will have disagreements and there must be a system to resolve these disputes. The term "anarchist society" is a oxymoron.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 10:44 PM
14

It's actually simpler than it seems. Anarchists fight the system. Feminists fight Patriarchy. Patriarchy is a system. In their eyes, they share common ground.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 08:26 PM
9

Also, while it's good to question, it's important to answer.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 05:42 PM
1

But the problem is... Gender Violence is just as general as Violence. When someone says "Gender Violence", it isn't saying much except that the focus of the violence is on one or more genders. As of now, the definition includes everyone except men. We can change this but that isn't the point. Gender Violence against Women... now that is a lens! But then doesn't it become easier to say Violence against Women?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 06:45 AM
1

If gender violence isn't sexist, please define the difference between violence and gender violence. Why not use "violence against X" instead?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 06:11 AM
-1

Congrats on your good genes.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 11:25 PM
2

Thanks. Also, is this video available outside of World Star Hiphop?
/r/MensRights10/05/13 06:57 AM
2

You have a source on that?
/r/MensRights10/05/13 05:56 AM
4

You missed the point. It's good to be a dad. It's better to be both a dad and a friend. This is a message to fathers who might be emotionally distant or think they have to be stern all the time 24/7.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 06:26 AM
23

So defending male rights is now considerd being an "extremist"?
/r/MensRights05/05/13 10:34 PM
-1

I don't know why Kitty Pryde would go out of her way to write such an article if there weren't some element of truth to her perspective Because reporters need money? Because she has an agenda? Because she has a false recollection of events? Because she is lying to protect her friend? Because XYZ? There are innumerable reasons. But that's not the point. The point is, if a recording of events doesn't surface, then it's up to DB and no one else to clear things up. And to be honest, I'm not even sur…
/r/MensRights02/05/13 05:00 AM
0

There's a huge difference between refusing sex... and refusing sex on stage. Everyone would have understood if DB shoved her away.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 04:44 AM
1

You can also find out by talking about it before trying something. And for those thinking it would 'ruin the moment'... if you word it right, asking if they're up for sex can actually be the hottest foreplay.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 11:41 PM
8

I think we all agree with the sentiment of what she is saying, but there is not enough proof to back up her 'interpretation' of the events. She herself says "I won’t go into detail about the actual events because I was pretty drunk and I don’t want to tell the wrong story"... so why is she writing an article about what happened? There are lots of versions of what happened, and as someone else has pointed out below, some photographic evidence points to the contrary of what she is stating. If no s…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 10:53 PM
1

Yes but the title presents a different story. Why is it so hard for reporters to write non-sensational titles?
/r/MensRights15/04/13 07:36 PM
2

'Domestic Violence Activist' sounds a little wrong.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 02:10 AM
9

Found the link to the article http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00180.x/abstract
/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:28 AM
45

Throwing a man into a woman's league is unfair for all the women in the league. Throwing a woman into a man's league is... unfortunate for the woman.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 08:33 PM
2

x-post from /r/rage Maybe you aren't trying to, but the post is VERY LIKELY to create lots of anger and zero useful discourse. Why? Because we can't talk to whoever made that facebook post.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 06:20 PM
6

Suit yourself. Personally, I dislike facebook posts because they must have blanked names. I have absolutely no knowledge of who is posting these things, why should I care what some ignorant hateful anonymous posts? If they were at least posting some interesting facts or questions I might consider upvoting it. But this is just hatemongering. I don't want a community built on hate.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 06:11 PM
12

No, not really. A picture of what someone posted on facebook is not something we can do anything about. A blog is public, and we can go there to post comments, we can analyze and criticize it's other content. That picture you posted is censored, which more clearly illustrates the point. Yeah someone has an opinion, people are dumb. What are you going to do about it? Take a screenshot and rage about it? You should have dialogued with that person instead. And THEN you can take a screenshot of it a…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 06:04 PM
47

MensRights is not ShitFacebookSays
/r/MensRights05/04/13 05:48 PM
4

Well if it's not necessarily a male strategy, but the strategy of only some men, then it's also the the strategy of only some women.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 05:28 PM
11

We're making assumptions here. In all I've read in her blog she doesn't state that she does what she does because she thinks women are being discriminated. She states that she does it because she wants to help other women interested in learning how to program. We don't know how she thinks. If we let her know in a respectful way she might just realize the hypocrisy of the situation.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 05:26 PM
34

If we agree that trading sex for resources is a female strategy, then by logic, trading resources for sex would be a male one. Who else would they be trading with? Other women?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 05:06 PM
21

Fund from PyCon are being destined to an activity that excludes a portion of the attendants based on their sex/gender. That's why.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 04:59 PM
14

Vagina's privilege.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 04:57 PM
124

Just walk in to PyLadies and tell them you identify as female.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 04:00 PM
40

From what I found of the organizer's personal website, she seems fine. She isn't an extremist, check it out yourself.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 03:53 PM
8

That's exactly what the title says.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 11:56 AM
-6

95% of the slut shaming I've encountered Come back when you have some real statistical information.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 12:58 AM
5

Why not just "Equality Resource Center" E-R-C?
/r/MensRights19/03/13 11:48 PM
2

Yes, events where Men's rights activists go to talk. They exist.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 06:31 AM
1

Here's a problem with the whole general model: Two people in a couple are both working, earning about the same. They get married and decide to have a baby. One of them stops working to take care of baby. As child grows, couple doesn't earn enough to pay for nanny, so one of them has to stay home and take care of child. Since one of them is already taking care of child and the other already has a job, they continue this way. Then, shit happens and they want a divorce. One person has 0% family inc…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:57 AM
-4

Is this subreddit really becoming Shit Facebook Says? Edit: I'm criticizing the posting of facebook statuses, not supporting it. Stop your downvotes.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 03:18 AM
1

He states that it's okay to hit someone because they insult you or scream in your face. I still don't think that's right. The only situation where violence is merited is in order to defend yourself and subdue the assailant.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 06:24 AM
10

Muthafucken equality up in this bitch.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 02:45 AM
2

Needs more crunch and less fluff.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 09:11 AM
6

Posted it 17 days ago. Seems reddit prefers things in picture format, I'll keep that in mind next time.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:03 PM
22

I'm sorry if this is too meta for you, but I find defending MensRights and the image of MensRights to be very important.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 04:41 AM
5

I also would have preferred if he strayed off the political topics, but I guess it's part of his skit.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 01:39 PM
25

Woman up. I think one reaction gif wouldn't do you justice, so here's three.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 07:51 PM
3

As long as it's well crafted like yours, no problem.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:51 PM
2

I specially like the short explanatory text at the bottom: Inspired by my female tutor, who told me that, as a male, I had no place arguing in favour of women's rights.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 03:21 AM
3

Hmm, then the situation is pretty fucked up.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 04:23 AM
0

Those would be the "extreme feminist" variety I was proposing.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 04:01 AM
2

Interesting point of view. Now we just have to confirm if core feminist philosophy has that skewed perception of men's power.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 03:54 AM
1

In many societies (for example china, middle east, central america and part of south america, just like in rural parts of europe, north america, japan), women do not have the respect men have. Girls are forced to do house work while boys go out and play. Young women are forced to become an object to be married off, while men have the freedom of choosing what to do with their lives and get the economic support of their family to do so. Adult women are objectified and in some countries their human…
/r/MensRights06/02/13 03:52 AM
5

Woah woah woah. Let's step back a moment. This is what I asked: I see many feminists who seek special advantages for women over men, and not just equal treatment. Is this part of feminist philosophy or is it just a distortion made by extremist feminists? I made no mention of 'power through the guise of victimization'. I asked if their core values ask for special treatment or to be treated equally. Don't put words into my mouth. That concept of a patriarchy does indeed paint all women as victims,…
/r/MensRights06/02/13 03:14 AM
3

A society based on male rule and privilege is a reality for the greater part of the world's population. But this has nothing to do with my question. Whether they are victims of male oppression is besides the point. I asked if they are trying to achieve equal treatment, or if they want to be superior.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 02:52 AM
3

I think this is what we should be focusing our efforts on. Making these extremist feminist realize they are bastardizing and destroying the core concept of their philosophy by taking it to the extreme. From the little I've studied, core feminist values can get along with egalitarian values. We just have to shine a light on these extremists as what they are: extremists.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 11:57 PM
5

but is it part of the core feminist philosophy? or just a distortion made by some?
/r/MensRights05/02/13 11:45 PM
-7

I agree, I see many feminists who seek special advantages for women over men, and not just equal treatment. Is this part of feminist philosophy or is it just a distortion made by extremist feminists?
/r/MensRights05/02/13 11:36 PM
30

As someone who is new to men's rights, could you explain or elaborate on why or how feminists hate women? Or maybe a link to a good article explaining that viewpoint?
/r/MensRights05/02/13 10:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter